Translate

Thursday, December 5, 2019

PELOSI SNAPS: "DON'T MESS WITH ME!"~SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE LOSES IT WITH REPORTER, THEN CALLS TRUMP A COWARD, & CLAIMS SHE'S A GOOD CATHOLIC, DOESN'T HATE ANYBODY, PRAYS FOR TRUMP

DECLARES THAT TRUMP IMPEACHMENT 
WILL PROCEED

Nancy Pelosi asked if she hates Trump

PELOSI SNAPS, SAYS SHE'S A CATHOLIC, 
BUT SUPPORTS ABORTION
"DON'T MESS WITH ME!"~SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE LOSES IT WITH REPORTER, THEN CALLS TRUMP A COWARD AFTER CLAIMING SHE'S A GOOD CATHOLIC, DOESN'T HATE ANYBODY, PRAYS FOR TRUMP
BY PAUL JOSEPH WATSON
SEE: https://summit.news/2019/12/05/pelosi-snaps-dont-mess-with-me/republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Nancy Pelosi snapped at a reporter who suggested she hated the president, angrily telling him, “Don’t mess with me!”
Pelosi was leaving a press conference on Capitol Hill when the confrontation happened.
“I don’t hate anybody…we don’t hate anybody in the world,” said Pelosi.
She then returned to the podium to call Donald Trump a “coward” not helping child victims of gun violence, dreamers and caring about man-made climate change while also accusing him of violating his oath of office.
“As a Catholic I resent your using the word ‘hate’ in a sentence that addresses me – I don’t hate anyone,” said Pelosi.
“I still pray for the president, I pray for the president all the time so don’t mess with me when it comes to words like that,” she snarled.
“Nancy Pelosi just used her Catholicism to defend impeaching President Trump. Apparently, she can’t be bothered to use it to defend preborn children,” remarked Jack Posobiec.


"PRIVACY" SEARCH ENGINE DUCK DUCK GO HATES US; PARTNERS WITH TWITTER IN CENSORSHIP OF CONSERVATIVES

"PRIVACY" SEARCH ENGINE DUCK DUCK GO HATES US; PARTNERS WITH TWITTER 
IN CENSORSHIP OF CONSERVATIVES
SARAH CORRIHER REPORTS
A closer inspection of DuckDuckGo (the search engine) was needed, as the last video about them triggered an outrage mob, which ironically came from a company that purports to defend our rights. DuckDuckGo is not the small-time free speech bastion that you might think it is. It is part of the Big Tech cartel that seeks to eliminate arbitrarily-defined "hateful content". In other words, Christian and conservative opinions.

BOYCOTT NOW!: AMAZON SMILE PROGRAM PREVENTS CUSTOMER DONATIONS TO PRO-ISRAEL ORGANIZATION, "PROCLAIMING JUSTICE TO THE NATIONS", BECAUSE THE SPLC BRANDED THEM A MUSLIM HATE GROUP

BOYCOTT AMAZON NOW!
SPLC BRANDS THEM A MUSLIM HATE GROUP
AMAZON SMILE PROGRAM PREVENTS CUSTOMER DONATIONS TO PRO-ISRAEL ORGANIZATION 
BY HUGH FITZGERALD
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research 
purposes:
Here’s the disturbing tale:
Proclaiming Justice to The Nations (PJTN), a Tennessee-based non-profit evangelical Christian organization committed towards standing with Israel and fighting antisemitism, has been removed from the AmazonSmile program, which enables Amazon customers to donate a percentage of their purchase to their favorite charity.
PJTN President Laurie Cardoza-Moore told JNS that “all of a sudden, we began being inundated with e-mails from supporters whose AmazonSmile donations to Proclaiming Justice to the Nations had been repeatedly rejected. They were being instructed to choose another charity, despite wanting to support PJTN.” After reaching out to Amazon for an explanation—assuming it was a technical glitch—the retail giant informed PJTN that customers would no longer be able to donate towards the organization using the AmazonSmile platform, following the listing of PJTN as a “hate group” by the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC).
The SPLC, whose website says that part of its mission is to monitor domestic hate groups in the United States, has PJTN listed on its “hate map” as being one of 36 Tennessee-based hate groups. SPLC specifically accuses PJTN of being “anti-Muslim.”
Amazon employs 566,000 people worldwide. The company clearly does not lack for personnel to study non-profit groups and to  advise Amazon as to which ones qualify for its customers to use the AmazonSmile platform, which allows them to donate part of their purchase to a favorite charity.
But Amazon chose not to do that work itself. Instead, it handed over the decision making as to which groups are to be considered “hate groups” to the Southern Poverty Law Center, which has a grand total of 254 employees. That means that for every employee of the SPLC, Amazon has more than 2,000 of its own. Is the SPLC so very good at its job that mighty Amazon, with its 566,000 employees, is right to rely on the 254 employees of that outside group? For years, the SPLC presented itself as beyond reproach, an organization of selfless do-gooders at a non-profit. But in recent years, defectors from the group have painted a grim picture of an organization run by scam artists – its head a “flimflam man” — who have arranged colossal salaries for themselves, in some cases have been guilty of sexual harassment of fellow employees, have exhibited racist attitudes, and have been thoroughly unmasked for these and other offenses in numerous damning reports.
Here is some of what Jessica Prol Smith, of the Alliance Defending Freedom, discovered about the SPLC:
For years, former employees revealed, local journalists reported and commentators have lamented: The Southern Poverty Law Center is not what it claims to be. Not a pure-hearted, clear-headed legal advocate for the vulnerable, but rather an obscenely wealthy marketing scheme. For years, the left-wing interest group has used its “hate group” list to promote the fiction that violent neo-Nazis and Christian nonprofits peacefully promoting orthodox beliefs about marriage and sex are indistinguishable. Sometimes, it has apologized to public figures it has smeared, and it recently paid out millions to settle a threatened defamation lawsuit.
These shameful secrets are no longer hidden in shadows. The New York Times, Politico, NPR and a host of other mainstream publications are reporting on the corruption and widening credibility gap. The SPLC dismissed its co-founder in March, and its president has resigned amidst numerous claims of sexual harassment, gender discrimination and racism within the organization — a parade of disgraces that vividly force the conclusion: The SPLC is hollow, rotten and failing at the very virtues it pretends to celebrate.
Morris Dees, co-founder of SPLC, was dismissed for many reasons. A multimillionaire from his work as a direct-mail marketer before founding SPLC, Dees was reportedly more concerned with fund-raising than with litigating; he had not tried a case in more than a decade, and other than raising money for himself and others, took little part in the SPLC’s day-to-day operations. During his tenure, there were accusations of gender discrimination and racism in hiring and promotions, as well as sexual harassment. The SPLC’s president, Richard Cohen, apparently resigned for much the same reasons — charges of race and gender discrimination, sexual harassment, and other, unspecified offenses. Both Cohen and Dees had been receiving very large salaries, way out of whack with non-profits of similar size.
The criticism comes from many corners. There’s the Current Affairs editor who seems sympathetic to the center’s progressive mission but decries its “hate group” list as an “outright fraud” and a “willful deception designed to scare older liberals into writing checks to the SPLC.”
There’s the retired investigative journalist who helped research and write an eight-part series on the center’s “litany of problems and questionable practices” in the mid-1990s. His Washington Post opinion piece reads with a thinly veiled message: We nearly got a Pulitzer Prize for TELLING YOU SO.
But perhaps most damning of all are the indictments leveled by former employee Bob Moser in The New Yorker. He remembers being welcomed to the “Poverty Palace” and recounts the heart-sinking reality of it all — being “pawns” in a “highly profitable scam.”
Stephen Bright, a Yale law professor and former director of the Southern Center for Human Rights in Atlanta, has long questioned what he calls the center’s “fraudulent” fundraising.
“The chickens have had a very long trip, but they finally came home to roost,” Bright said.
Morris is a flimflam man and he’s managed to flimflam his way along for many years raising money by telling people about the Ku Klux Klan and hate groups,” he said. “He sort of goes to whatever will sell and has, of course, brought in millions and millions and millions of dollars.
While the SPLC funded some good work, Bright said, he had long heard complaints about race discrimination and sexual harassment from the center’s former attorneys and interns.
The SPLC has been thoroughly discredited during this last year, yet Bezos has not said a word. Could it be he still doesn’t know about the scandalous goings-on at SPLC, or is that he doesn’t care? Perhaps he’s been busy, swallowing up yet another industry, but he really ought to give Amazon’s reliance on SPLC for deciding which are the “hate groups” to be banned from AmazonSmile more of his attention. And then he might decide to cut the cord.
Given all this, here’s what Jeff Bezos ought to do to spare himself further embarrassment. He ought to read what Tim Moser, the former employee of SPLC, wrote about the organization in The New Yorker. He should read the eight-part series by an investigative journalist on the “problems and questionable practices” at SPLC. He ought to find out what The New York TimesPolitico, and NPR have reported about SPLC, which has led many to conclude, with Ms. Smith, that the SPLC “is hollow, rotten, and failing at the very virtues it pretends to celebrate.” And he ought to interview Yale Law Professor Stephen Bright, to find out why he calls Morris Dees a “flimflam man.”
What were the charges, not specified at the time, that forced SPLC co-founder Morris Dees to resign in disgrace?  What were the charges that led President Richard Cohen to quit the SPLC? What have close observers of the SPLC discovered about how it has been run, to their dismay and horror?
Jeff Bezos should take a day or two out of his busy schedule of insensate empire-building in order to learn more about the SPLC, on which he has chosen to rely for the identification of “hate groups.” He needs to do more than read what Moser, Bright, and a dozen others who have either worked for SPLC or been close observers of the organization, have written. He needs to talk directly with them, so that he will realize the full extent of the SPLC’s transgressions, can ask them probing questions, and learn more about those “flimflam men” at the top, who have lately been exposed as being guilty of gender and race discrimination, among many other sins.
Bezos should also investigate SPLC’s readiness to label as “anti-Muslim hate groups” those who do not preach hate of any sort, but are simply islamocritics. The SPLC long ago consigned Jihad Watch to the outer darkness. When it included Maajid Nawaz, the founder of the Quilliam Foundation, on a 2016 list of “anti-Muslim extremists,” the SPLC was sued by Nawaz, who won a $3.4 million dollar judgment against the group. That has not stopped the SPLC from continuing to describe Jihad Watch, AFDI, and similar websites as being “hate groups.” SPLC describes, with its wonted tone of hysteria, Robert Spencer as that “notorious Muslim-basher and pretend expert on Islam.”
An email request by JNS [Jewish News Service] to SPLC asking for an explanation about their listing of PJTN went unanswered as of press time.
When asked by JNS what would cause the SPLC to label her organization as being anti-Muslim, Cardoza-Moore responded, “Proclaiming Justice to the Nations exists to fight the oldest hate on earth: antisemitism. We were given no explanation as to why we were blacklisted. If our work highlighting antisemites like [Reps.] Ilhan Omar [D-Minn.] and Rashida Tlaib [D-Mich.] got us on the list, we’ll wear it as a badge of honor. Despite the financial penalties that we are facing with AmazonSmile, will not be silenced for fulfilling our biblical responsibility to defend the State of Israel and Jewish people in the face of growing global antisemitism.”
She added that “sadly, the SPLC lost its way long ago, becoming a tool to shame any organization that doesn’t share their extremist agenda.”
Cardoza-Moore said that initially, she thought it was a joke that PJTN had been placed on the SPLC list of hate groups alongside the KKK. However, she said that “I have now learned that this political witch hunt against those who don’t share SPLC’s extremist liberal views has been adopted as a religious doctrine by Amazon. This could dramatically affect our ability to raise funds and function as a nonprofit organization.”
She added that it appears that Amazon “has become the nation’s new moral compass powered by the subversive Southern Poverty Law Center. Charities should not be persecuted in this way; this has to stop.
An Amazon spokesperson confirmed to JNS via email that PJTN had been dropped, saying in a general statement that according to their policy, “organizations that engage in, support, encourage or promote intolerance, hate, terrorism, violence, money laundering or other illegal activities are not eligible.”
Just as a matter of interest, perhaps Amazon would care to tell us if CAIR is eligible to receive donations through AmazonSmile. If it does, would Bezos be willing to consider the evidence that CAIR just might be an organization that “encourages or promotes intolerance, hate, terrorism, violence”? And while we’re at it, have any of the many pro-BDS groups that many of us believe encourage “intolerance, hate, terrorism, violence” been banned from participating in the AmazonSmile program?
The statement [from Amazon] mentioned that since 2013, Amazon has relied on the SPLC along with the US Office of Foreign Assets Control (of the US Department of the Treasury) to make its determination on which organizations are eligible for the AmazonSmile program.
Cardoza-Moore says that as a result of being dropped, she is calling on her donors to bypass Amazon in order to help support Israel and combat antisemitism.
“We have asked our donors to continue supporting PJTN directly instead of through AmazonSmile. Nobody will silence us, even when we stand up against giants like Amazon; we know that we have truth and justice on our side,” she said.
“Our answer to this hateful blacklisting will be to continue building more PJTN chapters across the United States and beyond. We will continue to fight antisemitism and defend the State of Israel, wherever and whenever necessary,” she continued. “We will endeavor to reach more people than ever because our message is needed now, more than ever.”
A statement from PJTN said that in recent months, the organization has led the struggle against the BDS movement in the United States with a wave of state resolutions, and has exposed textbooks used in public schools that it says are indoctrinating children with inaccurate historical information and bias that do not reflect American values.
In 2016, JNS reported that PJTN drafted the state of Tennessee’s anti-BDS resolution, which passed in the General Assembly, making it one of the first states to pass such state-level legislation against BDS.
So PJTN, unbowed, continues to be active in its campaign against the BDS movement. And its donors will now simply find other, more direct ways to support it, now that PJTN has been banned, so absurdly, from the AmazonSmile program. Many people, as they find out more about Amazon, and its continuing reliance on the discredited SPLC for its determination of which groups promote “hatred” and “intolerance,” may want to express their own displeasure with that malevolent and powerful Amazon, and take their business elsewhere.

REP. ILHAN OMAR PRAISES ALLAH IN WASHINGTON, D.C. CATHOLIC CHURCH

[VIDEO] Ilhan Omar Reads From Quran and Praises Allah in ...

#IlhanOmar recently posted a bizarre video of herself reciting a Muslim prayer in front of the altar of a Catholic Church. Over 20 congressmen attended the event, as did a Muslim interfaith leader…who also has ties to the Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas. On #Thanksgiving, Ilhan Omar posted a video on Twitter with a video of her at the pulpit in a Catholic church. In the video, Omar is reciting a Muslim prayer. The video, recorded last January when Omar first took office, was at an “interfaith service” at St. Peter’s #CatholicChurch in the Washington D.C. area. Omar posted the video with the heading: “Alhamdullilah (Praise to Allah) for the opportunity to serve my constituents, to care for my children and have a wonderful love in my life.” “This is a prayer a read on the start of Congress and feel grounded in its blessings.” “Thank you all for standing with me and for our #progressive movement!” “There is a prayer in Islam that says, ‘Allah, put courage into my heart, and take away all that might hinder serving you,’” starts Omar. “Free my tongue to proclaim your goodness, that all may understand me.” “Give me friends to advise and help me, that by working together our efforts may bear abundant fruit,” she continued. “And, above all, let me constantly remember that my actions are worthless unless they are guided by your hand.”
REP. ILHAN OMAR PRAISES ALLAH IN WASHINGTON, D.C. CATHOLIC CHURCH
BY ROBERT SPENCER
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research 
purposes:
How wonderful! How woke! How multicultural! Now: when will a big mosque in Washington invite a lot of Christian speakers to the mosque to praise Jesus? What’s that? Never? The “outreach” and “dialogue” only ever go in one direction? Now, why is that?
“Ilhan Omar Flashes Back to Reading Islamic Prayer in a Catholic Church: Allah, ‘Sustain Me with Your Power,’” by Hannah Bleau, Breitbart, December 2, 2019:
Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) on Thanksgiving posted a flashback of her reciting an Islamic prayer at St Peter’s Catholic Church in Washington, DC, as part of a service she attended in January.
Omar attended what was described as a “multi-faith” gathering which drew a number of high profile attendees like House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL), Rep. Donna Shalala (D-FL), and many more:
On Thanksgiving, Omar posted a flashback video, featuring the freshman lawmaker reciting an Islamic prayer at the service.
“Alhamdullilah [praise be to Allah] for the opportunity to serve my constituents, to care for my children and have a wonderful love in my life,” Omar tweeted alongside the video.
“This is a prayer a read on the start of Congress and feel grounded in its blessings,” she continued. “Thank you all for standing with me and for our progressive movement!”:
“There is a prayer in Islam that says, ‘Allah, put courage into my heart, and take away all that might hinder serving you,’” Omar stated in the video. “Free my tongue to proclaim your goodness, that all may understand me.”
“Give me friends to advise and help me, that by working together our efforts may bear abundant fruit,” she continued. “And, above all, let me constantly remember that my actions are worthless, unless they are guided by your hand.”
“Allah, may everything that I do start well and finish well. Sustain me with your power,” she continued….

PALESTINIAN AUTHORITY CHILDREN'S TV SHOW: "THE DARK-EYED VIRGINS YEARN FOR ME"

PALESTINIAN AUTHORITY CHILDREN'S 
TV SHOW: 
"THE DARK-EYED VIRGINS YEARN FOR ME" 
BY ROBERT SPENCER
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research 
purposes:
They shall recline on couches lined with thick brocade, and within reach shall hang the fruits of both gardens. Which of your Lord’s blessing would you deny? Therein are bashful virgins whom neither man nor jinns will have touched before. Which of your Lord’s blessings would you deny? Virgins as fair as corals and rubies. Which of your Lord’s blessing would you deny? (Qur’an 55:54-59)
“Dark-eyed virgins, sheltered in their tents. Which of your Lord’s blessing would you deny? Whom neither man nor jinns will have touched before. Which of your Lord’s blessing would you deny?” (Qur’an 55:72-75)
The number seventy-two for the virgins of Paradise comes from this multiply-reported hadith: “None is made to enter Paradise by Allah Most High except Allah Most High shall marry him to seventy-two wives, two of them from the wide-eyed maidens of Paradise and seventy of them his inheritance from the People of Hellfire, not one of them but her attraction never lags nor his arousal ever wanes.” (Ibn Majah; Ibn Adi’s Kamil; al-Bayhaqi’s al-Ba’th wal-Nushur)
“‘The Dark-Eyed [Virgins] yearn for me’ – Martyrdom-death promoted to kids on PA TV children’s program,” by Nan Jacques Zilberdik and Itamar Marcus, Palestinian Media Watch, December 2, 2019:
How old should children be before they are taught that the Dark–Eyed Virgins await them in Paradise if they become Martyrs for Allah? According to the Palestinian Authority no age is too young, as this message was broadcast on occasion of World Children’s Day on an official PA TV children’s program that addresses children as young as pre-schoolers.
In the same episode of the program The Best Home, two children recited poems encouraging Martyrdom-death for “Palestine.”
One poem, recited by a girl probably not more than 10 years old, taught that Palestinian kids – “lion cubs” – should use violence and fight with a “drawn” sword that “won’t return to the sheath.” The poem further told the kids that they have “the blood of the Martyrs” in their veins, and reminded them that according to Islam, the 72 virgins of Paradise – “the Dark-Eyed” – are “yearning” for them, and appreciate them when they die as Martyrs. The poem further stressed the ideal and urgency of seeking death – even right now – as it stated that “today I carry my shrouds.” Representing Palestinian adult approval, the PA TV host enthusiastically applauded the girl:
Lin Kamel Shahin: “I am the Palestinian lion cub…
The blood of the Martyrs flows in my veins
I am like a lion in the fields [of battle]
If the drums of war call, I harvest the souls in the fields
My sword is drawn and won’t return to the sheath…
The armies of treachery fear me
and the Dark-Eyed [Virgins] yearn for me
I have not sold my homelands, and have not given up my assault rifle
Today I carry my shrouds, and in my heart my faith strengthens
Because victory and liberation are coming at the hands of the lion cubs”
Official PA TV host: “Bravo! Bravo!”
[Official PA TV, The Best Home, Nov. 21 and 22, 2019]
This same poem promoting the ideal of dying as a Martyr was recited last year by a host on official PA TV in honor of a terrorist who was killed while stabbing four Israeli police men.
And just last week, Palestinian Media Watch exposed a similar Martyrdom promoting message to children, transmitted by an equally young girl on Palestinian radio and Fatah’s official Facebook page. The girl recited a poem in which a mother tells her son that Palestinian children are destined to die as Martyrs – a message that should be considered child abuse….

DEMOCRAT IMPEACHMENT COUNSEL NORM EISEN A SOROS-CONNECTED OBAMA MINION~RECEIVED OVER $1 MILLION FROM SOROS

"ETHICS CZAR" UNDER OBAMA & BIDEN:
Norm Eisen, former White House Special Counsel for Ethics and Government.
HIS STORY:
DEMOCRAT IMPEACHMENT COUNSEL EISEN 
A SOROS-CONNECTED OBAMA MINION

Left-wing operative pushed for impeachment immediately after Trump’s election

BY KELEN MCBREEN
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research 
purposes:
Democrats on the House Judiciary Committee selected a Soros-connected, anti-Trumper named Norm Eisen as counsel for Wednesday’s impeachment inquiry where “expert” witnesses are testifying.
Eisen founded the nonprofit Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) in 2003 before moving on to serve as President Obama’s Special Counsel for Ethics and Government Reform in the White House in 2009.
Eventually, Eisen became Obama’s Ambassador to the Czech Republic and in 2014, joined the Brookings Institute as a Visiting Fellow.
He was also a CNN political commentator who frequently appeared on the network to bash Trump and has written op-eds for The New York Times, The Washington Post, Politico, USA Today, and other national publications.
Eisen’s left-wing watchdog organization CREW received funding from multiple groups affiliated with billionaire globalist George Soros.
In 2011, CNS News investigative reporter Fred Lucas wrote, “Two groups affiliated with George Soros have been big contributors to CREW. In a 2006 interview, Sloan revealed that the Open Society Institute, a grantmaker founded by Soros, contributed $100,000 to CREW.”
“The Democracy Alliance, another Soros creation, helped launch CREW. The Washington Post reports that the Alliance’s financial ‘blessing effectively jump-started’ the organization,” Lucas continued.
The Washington Times reported that Soros’s Open Society Foundations “donated $1.35 million in 2017.”
The Brookings Institute also benefited from $100,000-$249,999 in donations from Soros’ Open Society Foundations, according to the group’s 2018 contributors list.
A December 11, 2016 tweet from Eisen proves the liberal operative has had his sights set on impeachment since before Trump was even sworn in.
“Vive le resistance!” Eisen tweeted shortly after Trump won the election in November, adding, “Let the battle begin!” on an inauguration day message.
Blind allegiance to the Democratic Party and a strong desire to remove President Trump from office makes Eisen the perfect candidate for leading the left’s latest coup attempt.
_________________________________________________

Impeachment Counsel Norm Eisen Has Ties to George Soros Cash

BY LUIS MIGUEL
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research 
purposes:
Norm Eisen, who has been chosen by Democrats in the House Judiciary Committee to serve as their counsel in charge of questioning “expert” witnesses during the panel’s first hearing on Wednesday, founded an organization that received over $1 million in funding from left-wing money man George Soros.
Eisen formed Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) before being selected by Barack Obama to serve as the administration’s “ethics czar.”
Soros’ Open Society Institute was an early funder of CREW, which is known for its left-wing slant. Open Society donated $1.35 million to CREW in 2017 alone.
In August, the Washington Times reported that CREW was providing pro bono legal assistance for the 2017 lawsuit filed by Maryland and the District of Columbia that claimed President Trump has violated the domestic and foreign emoluments clauses of the U.S. Constitution because his hotels are used by foreign public leaders.
Scott Walter, president of the conservative Capital Research Center, has called CREW a “one-eyed watchdog,” referring to the ethics watchdog’s propensity to target Republicans rather than Democrats. “The right eye doesn’t work. Just the left,” Walter added.
Eisen also served in the Obama administration as ambassador to Ukraine. Upon his return to the United States, he took up a position at the liberal Brookings Institution and, until this year, worked as a CNN analyst — usually attacking President Trump.
Eisen has been a purveyor of the theory that President Trump colluded with Russia to win the 2016 election, going so far as to author a New York Times op-ed in 2018 in which he referred to “new evidence of collusion with Russia” in the investigation of former Trump attorney Michael Cohen. “Contrary to the president’s claim that all of this ‘totally clears’ him, the danger to Mr. Trump, his business and his campaign has compounded significantly,” Eisen wrote.
Special Counsel Robert Mueller ultimately found no evidence of collusion after a two-year investigation.
During the hearing on Wednesday, Eisen suggested that the president may have committed an impeachable offense by considering pardoning Cohen and others of his associates.
Eisen wasn’t the only figure associated with Wednesday’s Judiciary Committee hearing whose left-wing financial ties raise questions of objectivity.
Pamela Karlan, one of three legal scholars tapped as a “witness” by Democrats, donated $1,000 in July to the presidential campaign of Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.).
She also made a $2,000 donation to Hillary Clinton in 2007 and a $1,000 donation to Barack Obama in 2008.
Karlan, a professor at Stanford Law School, has defended various liberal causes and was even considered as a possible Supreme Court nominee in the early days of the Obama administration.
“Everything I know about our Constitution and its values, and my review of the evidentiary record, tells me that when President Trump invited — indeed, demanded — foreign involvement in our upcoming election, he struck at the very heart of what makes this country the 'republic' to which we pledge allegiance,” Karlan stated at the hearing. “That demand constituted an abuse of power.”
In another portion of her testimony, Karlan appeared to mock the name of President Trump’s youngest son, Barron. “Contrary to what President Trump has said, Article 2 [of the Constitution] does not give him the power to do anything he wants,” Karlan told lawmakers. “The Constitution says there can be no titles of nobility, so while the president can name his son Barron, he can’t make him a baron.”
Trump campaign spokeswoman Kayleigh McEnany fired back at Karlan in a statement:
Only in the minds of crazed liberals is it funny to drag a 13-year-old child into the impeachment nonsense. Pamela Karlan thought she was being clever and going for laughs, but she instead reinforced for all Americans that Democrats have no boundaries when it comes to their hatred of everything related to President Trump.
While the other two Democrat witness seconded Karlan’s claim that the president committed impeachable offenses, the Republican-selected witness, George Washington University professor Jonathan Turley, charged Democrats with “abuse of power” for improperly accusing President Trump of obstruction of justice — and called Democrats’ case the “thinnest” ever against any president.
“I can’t emphasize this enough, and I’ll say it just one more time,” Turley said. “If you impeach a president, if you make a 'high crime and misdemeanor' out of going to the courts, it is an abuse of power. It’s your abuse of power. You’re doing precisely what you’re criticizing the president for doing.”

A HILLARY CLINTON DONOR LAWYER MOCKS TRUMP'S SON BARRON; COMPARES TRUMP TO A KING ABOVE THE LAW WHO CAN'T MAKE HIS SON A BARON~MALIGNS CONSERVATIVES

Rep. Gaetz Exposes Liberal Professor Karlan’s Political Bias & Condemns Her Comments 

On Barron Trump 

KARLAN: LIBERALS ARE NATURAL COLLECTIVIST GROUPIES, BUT CONSERVATIVES HAVE TROUBLE WITH "COMPACTNESS"

DEM IMPEACHMENT ‘WITNESS’ MOCKS PRESIDENT TRUMP’S 13-YEAR-OLD SON BARRON IN BIZARRE RANT

Pro-Hillary lawyer Pamela Karlan sends Democrat coup off the rails

BY JAMIE WHITE
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research 
purposes:
Update: Professor Pamela Karlan issued a backhanded apology for bringing up 13-year-old Barron Trump during the Democrat impeachment circus, adding she wishes President Trump would also apologize over his policies.
One of the anti-Trump “witnesses” brought forward by House Democrats launched into a weird tangent about President Trump’s 13-year-old son Barron to make a point about tyrannical kings…or something.
While testifying before the House Judiciary Committee on Wednesday, Stanford law professor and lawyer Pamela Karlan began ranting about Barron and the Constitution to somehow argue that Trump wishes he could be a king.
“Kings could do no wrong because the king’s word was law,” Karlan, a generous Hillary Clinton donor, said. “And contrary to what President Trump has said, Article II does not give him the power to do anything he wants.”
“I’ll just give you one example that shows you the difference between him and a king,” she continued, “which is, the Constitution says there can be no titles of nobility. So while the president can name his son ‘Barron,’ he can’t make him a Baron.”
Trump named his son “Barron” — it’s time to IMPEACH!
Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Florida) tore into Karlan for invoking Trump’s teenage son, asserting he has nothing to do with any of the relevant impeachment material.
“When you invoke the president’s son’s name here, when you try to make a little joke referencing Barron Trump, that does not lend credibility to your argument,” Gaetz told Karlan. “That makes you look mean.”
He then asked Karlan and the other witnesses to raise their hand if they had any “personal knowledge” of a “single material fact” relevant to the Democrats’ impeachment argument.
Nobody raised their hands.
Barron’s mother and First Lady Melania Trump even scolded Karlan on social media, telling the liberal lawyer that she should be “ashamed” for “using a child” to score political points.
“A minor child deserves privacy and should be kept out of politics. Pamela Karlan, you should be ashamed of your very angry and obviously biased public pandering, and using a child to do it,” Trump tweeted.
Democrat operatives bringing up the president’s youngest son to try to prove he committed an impeachable offense just highlights the fact they have absolutely no evidence of a crime.
It also further illustrates how low the left will go to smear, besmirch, or denigrate Trump by any means.
RELATED: DEM IMPEACHMENT ‘WITNESS’ GOES ON UNHINGED RANT ABOUT HOW TRUMP RUINED HER THANKSGIVING
___________________________________________________________________

Rep. Jordan Highlights Karlan’s Hypocritical Standards, “Ridiculous” Comments 

On Ukraine Phone Call

Kellyanne Conway slams Pamela Karlan: 

'Who the hell are you lady?'

Counselor to President Trump Kellyanne Conway sounds off on impeachment testimony from Stanford Law School professor Pamela Karlan on 'Fox & Friends.'