Translate

Showing posts with label Darwinism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Darwinism. Show all posts

Thursday, February 14, 2019

MORE THAN 1000 SCIENTISTS WORLDWIDE SIGN "DISSENT FROM DARWINISM"

MORE THAN 1000 SCIENTISTS WORLDWIDE 
SIGN "DISSENT FROM DARWINISM"
BY HEATHER CLARK
SEE: https://christiannews.net/2019/02/13/more-than-1000-scientists-worldwide-sign-dissent-from-darwinism/republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
While not necessarily expressing an adherence to biblical creation, more than 1,000 scientists worldwide have signed on to a “Dissent From Darwinism” statement that expresses skepticism over the theory of biological evolution and calls for the “careful examination” of Charles Darwin’s teachings.
“We are skeptical of claims for the ability of random mutation and natural selection to account for the complexity of life. Careful examination of the evidence for Darwinian theory should be encouraged,” the statement reads.
The list was first launched in 2001 by the Discovery Institute’s Center for Science & Culture, and has now grown to 1,000 and counting. The organization has launched a site where other scientists can sign the statement. It includes comments from prominent professors and researchers who explain why they support the dissent from Darwinism.
“Darwinian evolutionary theory was my field of specialization in biology. Among other things, I wrote a textbook on the subject thirty years ago. Meanwhile, however, I have become an apostate from Darwinian theory and have described it as part of modernism’s origination myth,” wrote Dr. Stanley Salthe, professor emeritus at the Brooklyn College of the City University of New York.
Dr. Marcos Eberlin, the founder of the Thomson Mass Spectrometry Laboratory, said that he became skeptical about evolutionary theory after realizing the wonders of the genetic code and “its many most intelligent strategies to code, decode and protect its information, such as the U x T and ribose x deoxyribose exchanges for the DNA/RNA pair and the translation of its 4-base language to the 20AA language of life.”
He remarked that genetics “absolutely relies on a diversity of exquisite molecular machines made by the products of such translation forming a chicken-and-egg dilemma that evolution has no chance at all to answer.”
“Scientific journals now document many scientific problems and criticisms of evolutionary theory and students need to know about these as well,” also said Philip Skell, an emeritus Evan Pugh professor at Pennsylvania State University. “Many of the scientific criticisms of which I speak are well known by scientists in various disciplines, including the disciplines of chemistry and biochemistry, in which I have done my work.”
Other signers include Alan Linton, the emeritus professor of bacteriology at the University of Bristol in the United Kingdom; Michael Kavaya, the senior scientist of the NASA Langley Research Center; William Arion, the emeritus professor of biochemistry at Cornell University; Marvin Fritzler, a professor of biochemistry and molecular biology at the University of Calgary Medical School in Canada; George Wells, a professor of computer science at Rhodes University in South Africa; and Hsin-Yi Lin, an assistant professor in the department of chemical engineering and biotechnology at the National Taipei University of Technology in Taiwan.
Answers in Genesis, in commenting on the “Dissent from Darwinism” list, noted that a number of signees—while expressing skepticism about Darwin’s writings—haven’t rejected evolution in its totality, and some may simply believe that additional research is needed.
President Ken Ham stated that Christians need to do more than simply discount parts of evolutionary theory, but to stand for Scripture as a whole.
“We need to stand against all beliefs that are contrary to the Word of God, including other evolutionary ideas (evolutionary geology and cosmology, for example) that undermine the authority of the Word of God,” he wrote in a blog post. “So yes, we do applaud what these scientists are doing, but we challenge them to look to God’s Word for the answers to their questions about origins, as many other scientists are already doing.”
As previously reported, not all of those who accompanied Darwin on his journeys supported his theories. During the 1860 Oxford evolution debate, Admiral Robert FitzRoy, who had once served as the captain for Darwin’s voyage to the Galapagos Islands and played a significant role in the development of the Origin of Species, repented of his participation.
Reports state that FitzRoy walked to the front of the room during the debate, “lifting an immense Bible, first with both and afterwards with one hand over his head, [and] solemnly implored the audience to believe God rather than man.”
Colossians 1:15-16 declares, “[Jesus Christ] is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. For by Him all things were created that are in heaven and that are on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or principalities or powers. All things were created through Him and for Him.”

Monday, November 5, 2018

TIM KELLER: DARWINIAN EVOLUTIONIST

TIM KELLER: DARWINIAN EVOLUTIONIST
 
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
 
“In order to be true to my own principle, I won’t bother you with information about the different views of the flood. Let me just lay out my own assumptions. I believe Noah’s flood happened, but that it was a regional flood, not a world-wide flood…those who insist on it being a world-wide flood seem to ignore too much the scientific evidence that there was no such thing.” 
–(Tim Keller, Genesis: What Were We Put in the World to Do? [New York: Redeemer Presbyterian Church, 2006],81

My own principle? My own assumptions? Scientific evidence there was never a global flood???
Take note of the dire warning to the Lord’s church by the Apostle Peter from his second epistle, whereby he clearly illustrates how to recognize the “scoffers” in this warning:
“This second epistle, beloved, I now write unto you; in both which I stir up your pure minds by way of remembrance:  That ye may be mindful of the words which were spoken before by the holy prophets, and of the commandment of us the apostles of the Lord and Savior: Knowing this first, that there shall come in the last days scoffers, walking after their own lusts, for this they willingly are ignorant of, that by the word of God the heavens were of old, and the earth standing out of the water and in the water:  Whereby the world that then was, being overflowed with water, perished.”   2 Peter: 3: 1-3, 5-6

Question: What does Peter say will be the mark of the coming ungodly scoffers?

Answer: Denial of the worldwide flood.

Keller is a Darwinian evolutionist and you will find him regularly partnering with the BioLogos Foundation, which was organized for the sole purpose of replacing the biblical account of creation with Darwin’s theory of evolution inside the church. This heresy is being cleverly propagated onto the church as “theistic” evolution, and again we see the manipulation of language used to promote heinous error in the church.
Theistic
ADJECTIVE
belief in a personal God as creator and ruler of the world.

“Animals, whom we have made our slaves, we do not like to consider are our equal.”  Charles Darwin
There is not a word of scripture that suggests any type of evolutionary process in the Genesis account of creation, as scripture makes clear that God created in six literal days and rested on the seventh. How do we know the six days are literal? Because a day is defined in the creation account:
And God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And the evening and the morning were the first day.” Genesis 1:5

Can it possibly be any clearer than this? No.

To prefix the theory of evolution with the term “theistic” makes it a much easier “sell” to the churches. A clear, concise creation account of what God did in the span of six days comes from the word of God. Darwin’s profane and dastardly theory, developed for the sole purpose of eliminating God, comes from the pit of hell. There is nothing “theistic” about Darwin’s godless theory, as we review the full title of (and concept behind) Darwin’s thesis:

“On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favored Races in the Struggle For Life.”

By means of natural selection?

So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them. And the LORD God caused a deep sleep to fall upon Adam, and he slept: and he took one of his ribs, and closed up the flesh instead thereof; And the rib, which the LORD God had taken from man, made he a woman, and brought her unto the man. And Adam said, This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh: she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of Man.” Genesis 1:27,2:21-23

Preservation of favored races?

“Then Peter opened his mouth, and said, Of a truth I perceive that God is no respecter of persons: But in every nation he that feareth him, and worketh righteousness, is accepted with him.”
Acts 10:34
Evolution, from the idea of natural selection to the perversion of preserving only favored races, cannot be “Christianized.” But that will not stop the false teacher, as they never allow truth to get in their way. Dr. Timothy J. Keller says the Genesis account of creation is just poetry, insisting that “science falsely so-called” should have the last word in the church.
“O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called: 21 Which some professing have erred concerning the faith. Grace be with thee. Amen.”   1 Timothy 6: 20-21

In an essay he wrote for BioLogos titled Creation, Evolution and Laypeople, Dr. Keller revealed something that is both troubling and very telling about himself and his mission:

“If as a pastor I want to help both believers and inquirers to relate science and faith coherently, I must read the works of scientists, exegetes, philosophers, and theologians and then interpret them for my people. Someone might counter that this is too great a burden to put on pastors, that instead they should simply refer their laypeople to the works of scholars. But if pastors are not ‘up to the job’ of distilling and understanding the writings of scholars in various disciplines, how will our laypeople do it? This is one of the things that parishioners want from their pastors. We are to be a bridge between the world of scholarship and the world of the street and the pew. I’m aware of what a burden this is. I don’t know that there has ever been a culture in which the job of the pastor has been more challenging. Nevertheless, I believe this is our calling.”   https://biologos.org/blogs/archive/creation-evolution-and-christian-laypeople-part-1
Tim Keller says the pastor must build bridges of unity between the world and the church; he says it is their “calling.” He says it is what believers want from their pastors…?
God’s word is void of any such concept but rather completely condemns this idea, as Paul warns us:
“Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers: for what fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteousness? and what communion hath light with darkness? And what concord hath Christ with Belial? or what part hath he that believeth with an infidel? And what agreement hath the temple of God with idols? for ye are the temple of the living God; as God hath said, I will dwell in them, and walk in them; and I will be their God, and they shall be my people. Wherefore come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord.” 2 Corinthians 6:14-17
 The Apostle John couldn’t agree more:
And we know that we are of God, and the whole world lieth in wickedness.” 1 John 5:19
 Peter concurs that the church and the world are incompatible:
“Dear friends, I warn you as temporary residents and foreigners to keep away from worldly desires that wage war against your very souls.” 1 Peter 2:11
Peter identified believers as “temporary residents” and “foreigners” in this corrupt world; this doesn’t help much to promote Keller’s idea of uniting and building bridges. Jesus is completely at odds with the idea of his church uniting with the world:
“If the world hate you, ye know that it hated me first.  If ye were of the world, the world would love his own: but because ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you. Remember the word that I said unto you, The servant is not greater than his master. If they have persecuted me, they will also persecute you.”   John 15:18-20

  The Apostle Paul details the role of the men who teach the church in undeniably clear language and it is the polar opposite of Keller’s definition of pastoral ministry:

“I charge thee therefore before God, and the Lord Jesus Christ, who shall judge the quick and the dead at his appearing and his kingdom; Preach the word; be instant in season, out of season; reprove, rebuke, exhort with all long suffering and doctrine.”  2 Timothy 4:1-2
 Take heed therefore unto yourselves, and to all the flock, over the which the Holy Ghost hath made you overseers, to feed the church of God, which he hath purchased with his own blood.” Acts 20:28
 “And he gave some, apostles; and some, prophets; and some, evangelists; and some, pastors and teachers; For the perfecting of the saints, for the work of the ministry, for the edifying of the body of Christ: Till we all come in the unity of the faith, and of the knowledge of the Son of God, unto a perfect man, unto the measure of the stature of the fulness of Christ” Ephesians 4:11-13
Below is a link to the list of pro-evolution essays Keller has produced for The BioLogos Foundation: https://biologos.org/author/tim-keller
Pastor John M. Otis has written a great book exposing the sinful error of any form of evolutionary thought in the church, as it robs God of his glory in creation, undermines all confidence in the word of God and collapses the very foundation of the Cross regarding the fall of Adam, sin and death.

Dr. Otis’ warnings to the church regarding evolution and its compromisers, including Tim Keller, can be found in the three links below.

Interview with John Otis about his book on the sinfulness of evolutionary compromise, with warnings about Tim Keller.  (159.24 minutes) http://www.ironsharpensironradio.com/podcast/july-24-2015-isi-radio-show-with-john-otis-on-theistic-evolution-a-sinful-compromise/
Audio link to Otis’ lecture warning believers about Keller’s teaching and influence (51.27 minutes)  http://www.sermonaudio.com/saplayer/playpopup.asp?SID=63131119404
PDF file of John Otis’ book (to read Chapter 8 “The Compromisers: Dr. Tim Keller” click on the link and scroll down to page 121, which is the beginning of chapter 8 on Keller)
http://triumphantpublications.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/TheisticEvolution.pdf

You can add Darwinian evolution to the long list of heresies Tim Keller is promoting in the Lord’s church. We will continue to expose the extensive error of Keller’s false theology in the next post.

Written by Toni Brown – Read more BTWN articles by her – HERE
Read another article on Tim Kellers view of creation & evolution – HERE
Check her website out – HERE 
Read more about Tim Keller HERE and HERE

Check Out Everything Bible Thumping Wingnut – HERE

Support BTWN – HERE

Follow BTWN on Twitter – HERE

Like Our Facebook Page – HERE

______________________________________________________

 Trevor Loudon Interview - Are Churches in America being Infiltrated?

 

 

Saturday, April 29, 2017

EUGENICIST "SCIENCE GUY" BILL NYE'S PERVERTED "SEX JUNK" RAP VIDEO WITH RACHEL BLOOM DISPLAYS TRANSGENDERISM TO CHILDREN IN SONG & DANCE

 WARNING: EXTREME PERVERSION

"SCIENCE GUY" BILL NYE'S "SEX JUNK" RAP VIDEO WITH RACHEL BLOOM DISPLAYS TRANSGENDERISM 
TO CHILDREN IN SONG & DANCE
UPDATED APRIL 29, 2017:
 Bill Nye's "Sex Junk" Rap Video-The Most Cringy in Human History 
 Published on Apr 24, 2017
Bill Nye the Science Guy's new Netflix show "Bill Nye Saves the World" produced the most awful music performance in the history of the human race. Rachel Bloom from Crazy Ex-Girlfriend is the rapper, and it's about gender identity.
 This Video Will End Bill Nye's Career - My Sex Junk - Rachel Bloom - Bill Nye Saves The World 

Bill Nye The Cisgender Guy and the Ridiculous Netflix Gender Rap Song From Rachel Bloom (REACTION) 
Published on Apr 25, 2017
Bill Nye the “Science Guy” has a new show on Netflix called “Bill Nye Saves The World” and at least one of the segments is not going over very well with the internets. A person posted the video on YouTube and the dislike to like ratio is somewhere around 90% or higher. The segment in question features Rachel Bloom of the television show “My Crazy Ex Girlfriend.” She broke out into a rap song about gender and how it’s on a spectrum. She also talked about the various forms of homosexual sex referring to it as “butt stuff.” A really bizarre performance which was made even more bizarre by former 90’s nerd icon Bill Nye dancing in the background like a hip hop hype man.

As with many other former Hollywood stars, Bill Nye appears to be a desperate man. He was made a household name for his 1990’s science experiment show … but what does a man with only a Bachelor’s Degree in Mechanical Engineering do after his show as a television scientist concludes? He may be too famous for mundane 9-5 type of work … and not skilled enough to become an Elon Musk type of person. So what to do? Remain in the public sphere and try to make money just like all other Hollywood actors attempt to do so they can prevent from being a fixture on the world famous Skid Row in Los Angeles.

So his solution to his apparent career issues appears to have made him become a shill for corporate / political interests in Washington D.C. What other reason is there to go back on what you said in your aforementioned TV show as far as gender being determined by your chromosomes to now say that it is fluid? This is on top of him being second to only Algore himself when it comes to marketing the false religion of climate change. Bill Nye, once a respected man, is now a shell of his former self with a Netflix Show which does nothing but promote the viewpoint of a social justice warrior disguised as “science.”

EUGENICIST BILL NYE: SCIENCE GUY TRASHES LARGE FAMILIES; AS WELL AS RELIGION, AND PRO LIFERS

 
ANY REAL DIFFERENCE BETWEEN BILL NYE, BILL GATES, HILLARY CLINTON & MARGARET SANGER, FOUNDER OF PLANNED PARENTHOOD ON EUGENICS?
https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/564x/9b/dd/95/9bdd9504fd38f14c7785e67b02844c59.jpg
http://i2.wp.com/moralmatters.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/HillaryOnMargaretSanger2QuotesHillary-Clinton-and-racist-Margaret-Sanger.png
 http://media-cache-ec0.pinimg.com/736x/e3/70/5a/e3705ad36019f324f35fc1c7d12944ad.jpg
https://cbshot937.files.wordpress.com/2017/03/bill_nye_saves_world_poster.jpg?w=640&h=360&crop=1
 https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/236x/77/da/e0/77dae077d3ac3056d0386c8a58250385.jpg
 https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiJvurBwv50bV62FvinuO4jecHpgcui5_yDfKyseuXfYVxts8E99HpwYc65Ycb98GLPJEDAoyt_WZPIXU4hZ_1wJohuCgKnlcA2qff8DVYISkx0UVnSWOyIN2RhwiUYWGlMPRVnFkK4w-tg/s640/bill+nye.png
BILL NYE: SCIENCE GUY TRASHES LARGE FAMILIES 
 
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 
Bill Nye Trashes People With Large Families, Wants Them Penalized for Having “Extra Kids”
NATIONAL   MICAIAH BILGER   APR 26, 2017   |   12:19PM    WASHINGTON, DC
Bill Nye “the Science Guy,” famous for hosting a children’s educational TV show, is not as kid-friendly as he initially may appear.
An abortion advocate, Nye recently hosted a new Netflix show that The Federalist describes as bordering on eugenics.
The episode “Earth’s People Problem” is part of the Netflix series “Bill Nye Saves the World.” In the half-hour show, Nye and several panelists discuss how they think large families and population growth are affecting the world, according to the report.
One of those panelists is an abortionist named Nerys Benfield who practices at the Montefiore Medical Center in New York City. Another is Dr. Rachel Snow of the United Nations Population Fund, which has been linked to coercive abortion practices in China.
Nye begins the show by describing how humans use natural resources. According to the report:
Following an intro that demonstrates how human consumption is like sponges soaking up water, Nye explains how women who have access to educational and professional opportunities tend to have fewer children. This is true …
Nye says when women are in power, they have fewer children, and more resources can be devoted to those children. “It’s not rocket surgery. It’s science!” he coyly explains.
The underlying eugenic and abortion tones come out later in the show. Though the word “abortion” never is mentioned, panelists hint at it while talking about family planning and women’s health care.
At one point, Nye even asks the panel if families should be penalized for having “extra kids.”
The report continues:
The fight against climate change, Nye’s most passionate cause, is brought up by [Dr. Travis Rieder, ethicist at the Berman Institute at Johns Hopkins University], who notes that children in developed countries use 160 times more resources than children in the developing world. This is where the creepy totalitarianism of the environmental movement starts to show itself. Nye asks, bluntly, “Should we have policies that penalize people for having extra kids in the developed world?” …
Rieder says we should “at least consider” a form of punishment for people who have these Extra Kids (TM). Nye impatiently responds that “consider means do it.” Snow, to her credit, jumps in and takes issue with the idea that “we do anything to incentivize fewer children or more children.” Benfield notes the history of compulsory sterilization in America, a practice that was in place as recently as the 1970s. The issue was not come at from a position of justice in the past, she adds. But this time will be different, I guess?
Some countries already do penalize large families, and their population policies are notoriously abusive. China mandates that families have only two children. Until last year, most families in China were allowed one child. Families who have more than one or two children report being coerced or even forced to abort their unborn children, fired from their jobs and penalized with huge fines.
Last October, the BBC interviewed a Chinese family who went into hiding after conceiving a third child.
“The local government carries out pregnancy examinations every three months,” the husband told the BBC. “If we weren’t in hiding, they would have forced us to have an abortion.”
Others have been even less fortunate. A U.S. Congressional report from 2011 detailed one horrifying case where a woman 9-months pregnant with twins was dragged to a local medical center, held down and forced to abort her unborn twins.
These coercive population policies have proven to be abusive, and yet they are being promoted again in popular western media.
_____________________________________________________
 Bill Nye The Eugenics Guy 
 Published on May 2, 2017
Despite the fact that Bill Nye isn't a scientist, (he only plays one on TV, kids) he's more than happy to come out and advocate for imprisoning those who don't share his "scientific" beliefs and talk positively about eugenics.

Del Bigtree vs Bill Nye on Vaccines 

 Here’s how vaccines work. We study a germ. We call this particular one: Gary. [growling noises] Believe it or not, that is absolutely how they teach the class on vaccinations in every medical school across the country. Basically, we take a disease. We modify it, and we put it in some inert substance, and inject into you and your body recognizes it over and over again and fights it. But Bill Nye has completely and totally oversimplified this to make you think it’s a good idea. Here’s the part of this little 1st grader’s textbook example you didn’t cover, Bill. First of all: aluminum. What happens when you inject it when you’re a baby? Has there every been a safety test on it? Never. Not in the history of man have we ever said “What is it that happens when we inject aluminum?” We don’t care, Bill. Gary gets a little shot of aluminum in there. So we’re going to take mercury… we’re putting it inside of Gary here. Most toxic substance, by the way, that’s not radioactive.

VIDEO:

 New Low, Bill Nye: Science Is Not Real, Claims Chromosomes Do Not Pick Gender

Thursday, April 27, 2017

EUGENICIST BILL NYE: SCIENCE GUY TRASHES LARGE FAMILIES; AS WELL AS RELIGION, AND PRO LIFERS

 
ANY REAL DIFFERENCE BETWEEN BILL NYE, BILL GATES, HILLARY CLINTON & MARGARET SANGER, FOUNDER OF PLANNED PARENTHOOD ON EUGENICS?
https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/564x/9b/dd/95/9bdd9504fd38f14c7785e67b02844c59.jpg
http://i2.wp.com/moralmatters.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/HillaryOnMargaretSanger2QuotesHillary-Clinton-and-racist-Margaret-Sanger.png
 http://media-cache-ec0.pinimg.com/736x/e3/70/5a/e3705ad36019f324f35fc1c7d12944ad.jpg
https://cbshot937.files.wordpress.com/2017/03/bill_nye_saves_world_poster.jpg?w=640&h=360&crop=1
 https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/236x/77/da/e0/77dae077d3ac3056d0386c8a58250385.jpg
 https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiJvurBwv50bV62FvinuO4jecHpgcui5_yDfKyseuXfYVxts8E99HpwYc65Ycb98GLPJEDAoyt_WZPIXU4hZ_1wJohuCgKnlcA2qff8DVYISkx0UVnSWOyIN2RhwiUYWGlMPRVnFkK4w-tg/s640/bill+nye.png
BILL NYE: SCIENCE GUY TRASHES LARGE FAMILIES 
 
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 
Bill Nye Trashes People With Large Families, Wants Them Penalized for Having “Extra Kids”
NATIONAL   MICAIAH BILGER   APR 26, 2017   |   12:19PM    WASHINGTON, DC
Bill Nye “the Science Guy,” famous for hosting a children’s educational TV show, is not as kid-friendly as he initially may appear.
An abortion advocate, Nye recently hosted a new Netflix show that The Federalist describes as bordering on eugenics.
The episode “Earth’s People Problem” is part of the Netflix series “Bill Nye Saves the World.” In the half-hour show, Nye and several panelists discuss how they think large families and population growth are affecting the world, according to the report.
One of those panelists is an abortionist named Nerys Benfield who practices at the Montefiore Medical Center in New York City. Another is Dr. Rachel Snow of the United Nations Population Fund, which has been linked to coercive abortion practices in China.
Nye begins the show by describing how humans use natural resources. According to the report:
Following an intro that demonstrates how human consumption is like sponges soaking up water, Nye explains how women who have access to educational and professional opportunities tend to have fewer children. This is true …
Nye says when women are in power, they have fewer children, and more resources can be devoted to those children. “It’s not rocket surgery. It’s science!” he coyly explains.
The underlying eugenic and abortion tones come out later in the show. Though the word “abortion” never is mentioned, panelists hint at it while talking about family planning and women’s health care.
At one point, Nye even asks the panel if families should be penalized for having “extra kids.”
The report continues:
The fight against climate change, Nye’s most passionate cause, is brought up by [Dr. Travis Rieder, ethicist at the Berman Institute at Johns Hopkins University], who notes that children in developed countries use 160 times more resources than children in the developing world. This is where the creepy totalitarianism of the environmental movement starts to show itself. Nye asks, bluntly, “Should we have policies that penalize people for having extra kids in the developed world?” …
Rieder says we should “at least consider” a form of punishment for people who have these Extra Kids (TM). Nye impatiently responds that “consider means do it.” Snow, to her credit, jumps in and takes issue with the idea that “we do anything to incentivize fewer children or more children.” Benfield notes the history of compulsory sterilization in America, a practice that was in place as recently as the 1970s. The issue was not come at from a position of justice in the past, she adds. But this time will be different, I guess?
Some countries already do penalize large families, and their population policies are notoriously abusive. China mandates that families have only two children. Until last year, most families in China were allowed one child. Families who have more than one or two children report being coerced or even forced to abort their unborn children, fired from their jobs and penalized with huge fines.
Last October, the BBC interviewed a Chinese family who went into hiding after conceiving a third child.
“The local government carries out pregnancy examinations every three months,” the husband told the BBC. “If we weren’t in hiding, they would have forced us to have an abortion.”
Others have been even less fortunate. A U.S. Congressional report from 2011 detailed one horrifying case where a woman 9-months pregnant with twins was dragged to a local medical center, held down and forced to abort her unborn twins.
These coercive population policies have proven to be abusive, and yet they are being promoted again in popular western media.
_______________________________________________________
UPDATED APRIL 29, 2017:
 Bill Nye's "Sex Junk" Rap Video-The Most Cringy in Human History 
 Published on Apr 24, 2017
Bill Nye the Science Guy's new Netflix show "Bill Nye Saves the World" produced the most awful music performance in the history of the human race. Rachel Bloom from Crazy Ex-Girlfriend is the rapper, and it's about gender identity.
 
 This Video Will End Bill Nye's Career - My Sex Junk - Rachel Bloom - Bill Nye Saves The World
 
Bill Nye The Cisgender Guy and the Ridiculous Netflix Gender Rap Song From Rachel Bloom (REACTION) 

Published on Apr 25, 2017
Bill Nye the “Science Guy” has a new show on Netflix called “Bill Nye Saves The World” and at least one of the segments is not going over very well with the internets. A person posted the video on YouTube and the dislike to like ratio is somewhere around 90% or higher. The segment in question features Rachel Bloom of the television show “My Crazy Ex Girlfriend.” She broke out into a rap song about gender and how it’s on a spectrum. She also talked about the various forms of homosexual sex referring to it as “butt stuff.” A really bizarre performance which was made even more bizarre by former 90’s nerd icon Bill Nye dancing in the background like a hip hop hype man.

As with many other former Hollywood stars, Bill Nye appears to be a desperate man. He was made a household name for his 1990’s science experiment show … but what does a man with only a Bachelor’s Degree in Mechanical Engineering do after his show as a television scientist concludes? He may be too famous for mundane 9-5 type of work … and not skilled enough to become an Elon Musk type of person. So what to do? Remain in the public sphere and try to make money just like all other Hollywood actors attempt to do so they can prevent from being a fixture on the world famous Skid Row in Los Angeles.

So his solution to his apparent career issues appears to have made him become a shill for corporate / political interests in Washington D.C. What other reason is there to go back on what you said in your aforementioned TV show as far as gender being determined by your chromosomes to now say that it is fluid? This is on top of him being second to only Algore himself when it comes to marketing the false religion of climate change. Bill Nye, once a respected man, is now a shell of his former self with a Netflix Show which does nothing but promote the viewpoint of a social justice warrior disguised as “science.”


Thursday, July 16, 2015

PERSECUTION OF CHRISTIANS BUT NOT BABY BUTCHERS, PERVERTS, ILLEGALS, NOR OBAMA THE LAWBREAKER

No law enforcement action taken against baby butchers while Christians like Kent Hovind go to jail for years for “unlawfully” withdrawing their own money from their bank accounts.

Planned Parenthood Breaks Law Sells Murdered Baby Body Parts To Mad Scientists

SEE: http://the-trumpet-online.com/planned-parenthood-breaks-law-sells-murdered-baby-body-parts-mad-scientists/republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

Christiannews.net
WASHINGTON — The abortion giant Planned Parenthood is downplaying a video released this week by a pro-life group that shows a top Planned Parenthood director describing the organization’s harvesting and sale of fetal body parts and organs for medical research.
As previously reported, the Center for Medical Progress released the video on Tuesday as the next in its “Human Capital” investigative series, as it researches the organization’s illegal sales of fetal body parts in America. It features abortionist Deborah Nucatola, Planned Parenthood Federation of America’s senior director of medical services, who oversees the practices of all the 700-plus Planned Parenthood locations nationwide.
Nucatola thinks she’s having a business dinner with representatives of a fetal tissue procurement company, but what she doesn’t know is that the man and woman that she is speaking with are undercover investigators and are recording her conversation.
NUCATOLA: $30 TO $100 PER PRESERVED SPECIMEN
During the discussion, as she munches nonchalantly on salad, Nucatola explains that certain mothers who obtain abortions want the child’s parts to be donated to science, and that the abortion facilities wish to accommodate them, but “in a way that is not perceived as ‘This clinic is selling tissue. This clinic is making money off of this.’”
She then describes in detail how the organs and extremities of the aborted babies are decidedly removed intact so that they can be sold to buyers. She outlines that the organization is paid between $30 to $100 per “specimen.”
“How much of a difference can that actually make, if you know kind of what’s expected, or what we need?” the male investigator asks Nucatola, wanting to find out if Planned Parenthood can set aside certain organs for sale.
“It makes a huge difference,” she replies. “I’d say a lot of people want liver. And for that reason, most providers will do this case under ultrasound guidance, so they’ll know where they’re putting their forceps. The kind of rate-limiting step of the procedure is calvarium. Calvarium—the head—is basically the biggest part.”
“It’s very rare to have a patient that doesn’t have enough dilation to evacuate the other parts intact,” Nucatola explains.
“To bring the body cavity out intact and all that?” the man asks.
“Exactly,” she replies. “So then you’re just kind of cognizant where you put your graspers. You try to intentionally go above and below the thorax, so that—-you know. We’ve been very good at getting the heart, lung, liver, because we know that, so ‘I’m not gonna crush that part. I’m gonna basically crush below, I’m gonna crush above, and I’m gonna see if I can get it all intact.’”
She mentions a “list” that she refers to in supplying the body parts that are in demand.
“For example, I had eight cases yesterday. And I knew exactly what we needed, and I kinda looked at this list and said, ‘Alright, this 17-weeker has 8 LAMs and this one—so I knew which were the cases that were probably more likely to yield what we needed, and I made my decisions according to that, too. So, it’s worth having a huddle at the beginning of the day, and that’s what I do.”
PLANNED PARENTHOOD: WE’RE HELPING ‘LIFESAVING SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH’
But Planned Parenthood released a statement on Tuesday following public disgust over the video, downplaying the matter by stating that the organization gives women the option of having their baby’s bodies donated to medical research.
“In health care, patients sometimes want to donate tissue to scientific research that can help lead to medical breakthroughs, such as treatments and cures for serious diseases. Women at Planned Parenthood who have abortions are no different,” it wrote. “At several of our health centers, we help patients who want to donate tissue for scientific research, and we do this just like every other high-quality health care provider does—with full, appropriate consent from patients and under the highest ethical and legal standards.”
Contrary to Nucatola’s outline in the video that the organization is paid between $30 to $100 “per specimen,” Planned Parenthood asserted that the organization does not make money from the organs or body parts of the babies.
“There is no financial benefit for tissue donation for either the patient or for Planned Parenthood,” the abortion giant contended. “In some instances, actual costs, such as the cost to transport tissue to leading research centers, are reimbursed, which is standard across the medical field.”
Planned Parenthood asserted that the video was created with malice as it believes that its involvement in “tissue donation programs”—or supplying aborted baby organs such as the child’s heart and liver—is actually doing the world an honorable service by supporting “lifesaving scientific research.”
“A well funded group established for the purpose of damaging Planned Parenthood’s mission and services has promoted a heavily edited, secretly recorded videotape that falsely portrays Planned Parenthood’s participation in tissue donation programs that support lifesaving scientific research,” it wrote.
CENTER FOR MEDICAL PROGRESS: PLANNED PARENTHOOD TELLING PART TRUTH, PART LIES
The Center for Medical Progress likewise released a statement after Planned Parenthood downplayed the undercover video footage.
“Planned Parenthood makes two key admissions in their statement today: 1) aborted fetal parts are harvested at their clinics, and 2) money is exchanged in connection with this,” it wrote. “They also tell several lies: 1) That proper consent is obtained from patients, 2) That Planned Parenthood does not make money off the body parts, and 3) that everything is legal.”
Nucatola, the Planned Parenthood director featured in the video, deactivated her Twitter account following release of the footage.
The Center for Medical Progress had released the full nearly three-hour video with Nucatola in addition to the eight-minute version so as to counteract concerns about the first video being edited.
____________________________________________________________
IRS PERSECUTION OF CHRISTIANS/CONSERVATIVES
SEE HOW PASTOR KENT HOVIND WAS WRONGFULLY INCARCERATED FOR YEARS BY FALSE IRS CHARGES OF "STRUCTURING" ETC.
58 COUNT INDICTMENT
"THE MOST HATED CREATIONIST" YOUTUBE CHANNEL:
NINE YEARS IN JAIL

The Alex Jones Show Interview with Dr. Kent Hovind


IMPRISONED FOR EXPOSING DARWINIAN SOCIALIST RELIGION:
SHORT

LONG


Kent Hovind is Now FREE!! 7-8-2015


A word from a free man Kent Hovind





Saturday, March 14, 2015

JOHN KERRY HIGH PRIEST OF GLOBAL WARMING RELIGION DESPOTICALLY WARNS THAT DISBELIEF IS IMMORAL

JOHN KERRY HIGH PRIEST 
OF GLOBAL WARMING RELIGION DESPOTICALLY WARNS 
THAT DISBELIEF IS IMMORAL

John Kerry: Climate Change Is an ‘Elementary Truth’ ...
Just like Gravity
SEE VIDEO: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LV1hNRd3-ec


John Kerry cites scripture, calls climate change deniers 'immoral',
leading to "utter catastrophe":

SEE VIDEO: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_qXheXgbtmI



THE "AGW GOSPEL"
EXCERPT:
Donning the robes of High Priest of Science, Secretary of State John Kerry delivered a rousing sermon on March 12 that presumed to speak for both Science and Religion on the supposed existential threat of anthropogenic (manmade) global warming, AGW. Warning that we face “utter catastrophe” and the end of “life as we know it on Earth” if we “do nothing” to stop global warming, Kerry said failing to act “is beyond reckless. It is just plain immoral.”
Secretary Kerry delivered his AGW jeremiad before the Atlantic Council, as part of the globalist organization’s “The Road to Paris” Climate Series, which is aimed at stirring support for the upcoming United Nations Climate Summit in Paris, France.
However, before putting on his preacher’s robe to condemn the unbelievers, Rev. Kerry first got into his scientist’s robe to establish with dogmatic certainty the inerrancy of the AGW gospel.
_______________________________________________________________

'The Road to Paris' Climate Series: The Significance of COP21 with Secretary Kerry (47 Minutes)





Saturday, December 20, 2014

KENTUCKY ORDERS KEN HAM'S "ARK ENCOUNTER" TO HIRE NON CHRISTIANS & NOT TO SHARE CHRISTIAN FAITH

ALERT:
AN IMMINENT THREAT TO ALL 
CHRISTIAN CHURCHES & MINISTRIES
"‘Every Religious Organization Should Be Worried': 
Kentucky Wants Ark Encounter to Hire Non-Christians":
December 17, 2014 by Heather Clark:
SEE: http://christiannews.net/2014/12/17/every-religious-organization-should-be-worried-kentucky-wants-ark-encounter-to-hire-non-christians/; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
"PETERSBURG, Ky. – Ken Ham, the founder and president of the Kentucky-based ministry Answers in Genesis (AIG), is expressing concern over new demands that the state is requiring of its proposed Ark Encounter, namely its requirement that the ministry not engage in “religious preference” in its hiring—meaning that it can’t refuse applicants simply because they are non-Christians.
“AIG as religious organization has the legal right to hire people who believe in our Christian faith—which is a right for any religious organization, whether Christian or not,” he said in the four-minute video posted to Facebook on Saturday.
Ham said that the matter became an issue when the state asked his ministry to resubmit its application for a sales tax refund, since the scope for the theme park had changed, and will open its various attractions incrementally instead of simultaneously.
“As we reapplied for the incentive, the state surprised us with two conditions not found anywhere in the law,” he said. “That is, one, we can’t show religious preference in our hiring, and two, we couldn’t share our faith at the ark.”
But Ham found this requirement to be problematic and said that the ministry had been upfront with the state since the beginning that the Ark Encounter is a Christian endeavor.
“I should point out that the state has known all along that our ark project was based on the Bible—it’s always been a religious attraction,” he stated. “Furthermore, when our attorneys met with the state officials earlier this year, we clearly explained the change in ownership structure and the need to preserve our rights as a religious organization, including the importance of not giving up our right to hire employees at the Ark Encounter who share our faith–as allowed by law.”
“In place of any restriction on religious preference in hiring, we agreed to comply all applicable state and federal laws, like those contained in other economic incentive agreements at the state, and the state agreed,” Ham said. “Only after the atheists groups objected and publicly attacked the state’s preliminary approval did the state renege on its commitment.”
The Australian-born Christian apologist asserted that Kentucky’s requirements of the ministry are unlawful.
“The state’s new conditions are clearly illegal,” Ham declared. “We can cite both federal and state laws that permit religious preference in hiring, like the 1964 Civil Rights Act. That’s why atheists groups can and do discriminate in their hiring.”
He said that all Christian organizations should be concerned about this requirement.
“This employment issue is a mater of great importance not only to every Christian organization, to every church that doesn’t want to give in to demands from the government to hire non-Christians,” he said. “In fact, every religious organization should be worried about what the state of Kentucky is trying to do.”
As previously reported, in 2010, AiG unveiled plans to build a 510-foot long ark in northern Kentucky, just southwest of Cincinnati, Ohio. The project, named the Ark Encounter, will follow the proportions and description of Noah’s Ark in the Book of Genesis. Construction for the theme park is currently underway."
_______________________________________________________________

Ken Ham Responds to the State of Kentucky 

About Ark Encounter

Published on Dec 12, 2014