Translate

Monday, December 9, 2019

ENGLAND: 6 YEAR OLD CHILDREN TOLD TO WRITE GAY LOVE LETTERS TO PROMOTE DIVERSITY

ENGLAND: 6 YEAR OLD CHILDREN TOLD 
TO WRITE GAY LOVE LETTERS 
TO PROMOTE DIVERSITY
 You can’t stop progress!
BY PAUL JOSEPH WATSON
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research 
purposes:
A video posted by the BBC shows 6-year-old primary school children being told to write gay love letters to promote diversity.
The clip features kids from Bewsey Lodge Primary School imagining themselves in the role of Prince Henry, who wants to profess his love for and gay marry his man servant ‘Thomas’.
“This school teaches children about LGBT relationships from an early age,” explains the BBC, “This class of 6 year olds is learning about gay marriage…all ages take part in LGBT lessons.”
Teacher Sarah Hopson explains how the children, “going to go out into that world and find this diversity around them, and they’ll find that at a young age as well. And the more they can be accepting at this age, you’re not going to face it further on because the children will be accepting now and will be accepting this diversity around them.”
The school has received numerous awards for its stance against “homophobic, biphobic and transphobic bullying” and follows the Personal, Social, and Health Education (PSHE) program, which lists “Diversity and equality (in all its forms)” as one of its key goals.
The program teaches children about “sources of support and reassurance” for “diversity in sexual attraction and developing sexuality,” the “difference between sex, gender identity and sexual orientation,” recognition of “diversity in sexual attraction,” understanding “accepted terminology” on LGBT topics, and the “need to challenge” “sexist, homophobic, transphobic and disablist language and behaviour.”
Parents of children being taught similar ideas at a school in Birmingham, almost all of them Muslim, were recently banned from protesting outside Anderton Park school against the LGBT indoctrination of their children.

EX NEW AGER: HOW THE "LAW OF ATTRACTION" WILL LEAD YOU ON THE WRONG PATH~WARNINGS ABOUT YOGA, REIKI, VISION BOARDS, VISUALIZATION, VISION CASTING

HOW THE "LAW OF ATTRACTION" 
WILL LEAD YOU ON THE WRONG PATH 
The Law of Attraction states that your positive or negative thoughts control your reality. Doreen Virtue and Melissa Dougherty explain why they no longer believe in, use, or recommend the Law of Attraction. They show in scripture what the Bible says about God supplying our needs, and the dangers of relying on Law of Attraction principles. You can write to Melissa at Instagram.com/melissa_dougherty77 and Doreen is at Instagram.com/DoreenVirtue through the Instagram message system

The Shocking Truth about the Law of Attraction & Word of Faith

Melissa Dougherty explains how the Law of Attraction (new age) and the Word of Faith movement (name it and claim it) have the same occult origin. Both are unbiblical and they take cherry-picked Bible verses out-of-context. Plus, they don't work and people then lose faith when they don't get their "best life now." You can contact Melissa through her YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCyKg... and through her Instagram page at: Instagram.com/melissadougherty77
"Why I Stopped Teaching Yoga and Reiki, to Follow Jesus" - Jessica Smith interview
Jessica Smith-My Story-Truth Behind Yoga
https://www.truthbehindyoga.com/my-story/
ALTERNATIVE TO YOGA:
https://www.truthbehindyoga.com/truetone-fitness/

Should Christians Avoid Yoga?

Why Christians Should Avoid Vision Boards, Visualization, or Vision Casting
Ex-New Ager Doreen Virtue warns Christians about the hidden dangers of using vision boards, visualization, and vision casting. Don't believe those who twist Scripture to justify selling you a course or book about vision boards.
Doreen Virtue Testimony: 
"Why I left the new age to follow Jesus" 
Doreen Virtue describes how and why she is now a born-again Christian, and why she has denounced her previous work
and the new age.




SOUTHERN BAPTIST SCANDAL: INDISPUTABLE PROOF SWBTS LIED; ERLC TARGETED PROFESSOR FOR PREACHING AGAINST LGBT "REVOICE" THEOLOGY

SOUTHERN BAPTIST SCANDAL
BOMBSHELL: INDISPUTABLE PROOF SWBTS LIED; ERLC TARGETED PROFESSOR FOR PREACHING AGAINST LGBT "REVOICE" THEOLOGY 
SEE: https://pulpitandpen.org/2019/12/06/bombshell-indisputable-proof-swbts-lied-erlc-targeted-professor-for-preaching-against-lgbt-revoice-theology/republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
INTRODUCTION FROM JD (HALL)
Let me interject here in this repost from Capstone Report with a few points of observation.
First, Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary (SWBTS) absolutely, 100% unequivocally lied in their press release about Dr. Lopez’ termination. There is zero doubt of that now.
Second, it is clear that SWBTS had no idea who they were messing with. Lopez apparently has guts-of-steel, is legally represented, and has hired professionals (so I hear) to represent him through this matter. He has audio and correspondence and has just released it like a big, fat bombshell on SWBTS.
Third, for the love of all that is good and pure, please do not overlook the fact that SWBTS was bending under the pressure of the Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission (ERLC). The ERLC is every bit the festering, liberal, cancerous sore we’ve told you they are. The ERLC, run by a Democrat, is getting conservatives fired from SBC seminaries. It’s pretty crazy.

Fourth, and this is my prediction: SWBTS is going to have the living daylights sued out of them. Lopez absolutely has cause for damages, but probably would not have if SWBTS had not sent out that libelous press release attacking his character. That single-handedly damned themselves. SWBTS will claim in court that this is an “ecclesiastical matter” to have the suit dropped (the SBC always does), but that will be an uphill battle for them to demonstrate. Personally, I think they’re going to end up paying a fortune to compensate Dr. Lopez and admit their error.
Fifth, in ten years of reporting on the Downgrade in the SBC, this particular issue has more capacity to split the SBC than anything else I’ve seen. I pray it does; it needs to split.—JD
[Capstone Report] Judge for yourself: Who is telling the truth? Audio, transcripts and emails released.
Tapes verify Lopez told that ERLC held him in low regard.
Dean allegedly on tape told Lopez that Southwestern didn’t want the attention his writings on sex abuse would bring to the seminary and if he continued such public teaching that Lopez would likely need to find other employment.
Provost says seminary holds to biblical sexual view.
Was Lopez’s real sin a violation of the SBC’s 11th Commandment in angering the powerful ERLC?
MORE…
What you need to know about the scandal at Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary involving Professor Robert Lopez and SWBTS administration..
A dispute between an employee and employer can be messy. It is especially messy when employer and employee tell different stories of what caused a termination. This is true of the case between Southwestern and Robert Lopez. Here’s what we know:
Lopez was very involved in fighting the gay agenda. According to the American Family Association, “Lopez had been active in writing and speaking about the dangers of the Equality Act and abuse in the gay community. And he had drafted and submitted a resolution to the SBC supporting counseling to help lead people out of homosexuality.  These were all apparently giant no-nos for the SBC, which according to Lopez has embraced the ‘Revoice’ ideology.  Revoice is a radical movement to promote normalization and acceptance of LGBTQ terms within the church—creating a slippery slope which many believe will lead to full-blown acceptance of homosexuality.
Lopez claims he was fired because of his insistence he would obey God rather than men and continue to teach against the sins of homosexuality. SWBTS claims he was fired because of curricula changes and internal issues including complaints from faculty and students.
Transcripts and audio of the meetings purportedly between Southwestern Professor Robert Lopez and Dean Michael Wilkinson and between Lopez and SWBTS Provost Randy Stinson were released today (December 6, 2019.) The release included supporting documents including emails sent by Lopez outlining the dispute over articles written by Lopez on matters of national importance, specifically, issues of abuse in the gay community and how Christians should stand for biblical orthodoxy on sexuality.
The transcripts and tapes prove a key element of the allegations. Specifically, SWBTS provost Randy Stinson mentions the Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission (ERLC) was unhappy with Dr. Lopez.
According to a transcript and audio allegedly of Stinson, “Then, I happen to be around some folks from the ERLC, where your reputation is not good there with those folks. So now there’s a growing concern of mine in terms of a failure to relate constructively to another major entity of the SBC. Which in turn compounds the problem of failure to relate constructively to this institution.”
Why was the ERLC unhappy? Lopez attributes this to his longstanding and public differences over how Christians should view sexuality. What other issue would the ERLC have against Lopez? Would they even know Lopez were it not for his opposition to Revoice and similar theological issues?
Lopez claims the disputes between himself and the administration centered on the ability to share his personal testimony at conferences, other speaking events and through essays or interviews.
According to the voluminous story revealing the transcripts, emails and other data is this summary statement worth quoting: “All the statements, interviews and publications that generated conflict regarded LGBT issues and sex abuse issues. There is literally no record Lopez can find of sustained conflict with the administration of any other kind.” However, Stinson in the transcript tells Lopez the content isn’t the issue. This becomes the crux of the dispute—Southwestern wants to make the dispute with Lopez into administrative procedures, but Lopez is correct that everything the administration objected to involved his ministry on LGBTQ issues.
The Greenway Administration is on tape telling Lopez the school didn’t want the attention his speaking about sex abuse in the gay community would bring to the seminary. That’s a major and stunning admission. The tapes show the school claiming biblical orthodoxy on the issue, but not wanting attention that would come to it if its professors spoke up in defense of biblical sexual standards.
According to the transcript of the September 13 meeting, “Dean Mike Wilkinson: The other thing is the article you wrote. Here’s the expectation of the administration. I think they were [inaudible 00:19:17] that you getting off social media was a good thing, that from that point, you were going to focus on the drama club and your courses, your academic work, and not be involved in other areas. [inaudible 00:19:37] I know that they don’t want that attention coming here. Robert Lopez: “I can’t give it up.”
Mike Wilkinson:  “And I understand that. It’s probably going to come down to if that’s an area where you really feel like you need to fight, understand what I’m saying here because I’m not giving you an ultimatum, but it may come down to if that’s an area you want to fight, they’re not going to want to have that fight take place from here.”
In one part of the transcript, the Provost tells Lopez this whole issue is not about content and that the seminary holds a similar view on sexuality to Lopez’s stance.
However, Stinson then redirects the conversation back to the view of an outside entity—the ERLC. From the transcript, Randy Stinson: “I’m not asking you to deny your Christian testimony. I’ve never done that. I’ve never told anybody else to deny you that. So this isn’t about your Christian witness in my mind. It is about your just relationship to this administration. Repeatedly. And even your relationship to another entity of the SBC.
Stinson indicated he wanted Lopez’s work to be reviewed based on several criteria. These included how SBC entities, leaders and others within the denomination might feel about Lopez’s writings. According to the transcript, “Randy Stinson: There are multiple factors…Who the audience is. The venue. What’s being said. How is it being said? [crosstalk 00:32:19] If it is going to be received poorly by the entity that pays the bills here, in terms of SBC.”
There is a lot more in the transcripts. Pages and pages. Read it and decide for yourself. Who is in the right? Lopez? Southwestern? Both? Neither? Share your thoughts.

TAKEAWAY: Why would it matter what the ERLC thought of a professor working at Southwestern? Is Russell Moore that powerful?

[Editor’s Note: This article was first published at Capstone Report, title changed by P&P]

JOE BIDEN WANTS TO BAN 9MM PISTOLS

Joe Biden Wants to Ban 9mm Pistols
JOE BIDEN WANTS TO BAN 9MM PISTOLS 
BY NRAHQ
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research 
purposes:
Fairfax, VA – -(Ammoland.com)- A week after he told voters that the Second Amendment doesn’t protect “a magazine with a hundred clips in it,” 2020 Democratic Presidential Candidate Joe Biden offered supporters more of his singular brand of anti-gun nonsense. While attending a private campaign event in Seattle, the former vice president reportedly called for a ban on 9mm pistols.
According to an article from the Seattle Times, Biden was in town to attend two private fundraisers, one of which was at the home of “a top Amazon executive.” The posh soiree set attendees back a princely $2,800 per-person. The other fundraiser was held at the home of a local philanthropist. That staider event offered donors a relative bargain with a $500 minimum price tag.

While speaking to attendees of the latter event, Biden claimed that he supports the Second Amendment. The 77-year-old then went on to ask “Why should we allow people to have military-style weapons including pistols with 9mm bullets and can hold 10 or more rounds?”

Biden also shared his tired and inaccurate claim that because there is a shot-shell restriction for migratory bird hunting, “We protect geese from Canada more than we do people.”
In targeting 9mm pistols, Biden has called for a ban on one of the most popular firearms in America. According to ATF’s Firearms Commerce in the United States FY 2019, there were over 3.6 million pistols manufactured in the U.S. in 2017. This was more than 1 million more guns than the next most popular category of firearms, rifles. Further, over 3.2 million handguns (including revolvers) were imported in to the U.S. in 2017.
In its annual report on the U.S. firearms industry, Shooting Industry reported that 9mm caliber pistols are the most commonly produced pistol and have been for many years. In 2017 alone, there were more than 1.7 million 9mm pistols produced in the U.S. Cumulatively there are tens of millions of 9mm pistols in the hands of law-abiding Americans.
The 9mm pistol is the choice of the nation’s leading civilian law enforcement agency, the FBI. Moreover, 9mm pistols are used by countless other federal, state, and local civilian law enforcement agencies. Biden alluded to the 9mm handgun’s military applications, but these agencies are not tasked with waging war on the public, but rather defending the public. This defensive application is the same reason that millions of Americans have chosen a 9mm pistol as their self-defense firearm.
The landmark Second Amendment U.S. Supreme Court case District of Columbia v. Heller concerned a complete prohibition on the ownership of handguns in Washington, D.C. The opinion made clear that the Second Amendment at a minimum protects the right to acquire and possess firearms “in common use at the time” for lawful purposes such as self-defense.
It is impossible to square Biden’s statement with the Supreme Court’s interpretation of the Second Amendment. Many types of firearms, such as the AR-15, are “in common use” for lawful purposes like self-defense and therefore protected under the Second Amendment. The 9mm pistol is not just “in common use” for self-defense. As the production statistics indicate, it may be the most common firearm in use for self-defense. Therefore, it is not permissible under the Second Amendment for a jurisdiction to prohibit 9mm pistols. The law-abiding 9mm pistol-owning residents of the D.C., Chicago, and a handful of Chicago suburbs are a testament to this fact.
Biden’s political career is an ongoing spectacle of anti-gun incompetence. However, his high-profile gaffes can serve an instructive purpose. Biden is emblematic of a political class that cannot be bothered to learn the most rudimentary information concerning firearms and the right to keep and bear arms. Despite nearly four decades in the U.S. Senate and eight years as vice president, he is still a complete ignoramus on the subject. Biden and his cohort don’t want to know anything about guns, gun rights, or gun owners. Rather, they prefer to mindlessly indulge their anti-gun prejudice at every opportunity.

ONE AMERICA NEWS REPORTER CHANEL RION GIVES DEBRIEFING ON UKRAINE TRIP~PROSECUTOR GENERAL YURIY LUTSENKO CLAIMS YOVANOVITCH PERJURED HERSELF

ONE AMERICA NEWS REPORTER CHANEL RION GIVES DEBRIEFING ON UKRAINE TRIP 
As part of her OAN Investigates exclusive, One America's Chanel Rion flew to Europe to talk to additional witnesses. These officials claimed to have evidence proving DNC collusion and criminal activity by the Bidens. Here's her summary of the trip and a preview into Part III of her series.
OAN EXCLUSIVE: Yuriy Lutsenko says Yovanovitch perjured herself before Congress
One America's Chanel Rion has been tracking down Ukrainian witnesses as part of an exclusive OAN investigative series, which dismantles the baseless Adam Schiff impeachment hoax. She spoke with Ukrainian former Prosecutor General Yuriy Lutsenko, who said Yovanovitch perjured herself before Congress.

Viktor Shokin: Biden outraged we seized Burisma assets

Former Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin spoke to OAN about Joe Biden's direct role in getting his office to stop investigating his son Hunter. One America's Chanel Rion has that story from Washington.

CHRISTIANS: WHY WE SHOULD AVOID BETHEL, HILLSONG, ELEVATION, JESUS CULTURE & GETTY MUSIC

CHRISTIANS: WHY WE SHOULD AVOID BETHEL, HILLSONG, ELEVATION, JESUS CULTURE & GETTY MUSIC 
Leanne, @faithfuldefender on Instagram, explains what she and her husband did when their church began playing Bethel music and why we should all avoid Bethel, Hillsong, Elevation, and Jesus Culture music. Leanne is on Instagram @faithfuldefender and Facebook at TheFaithfulDefender The Getty article referenced in this video is at: https://www.christianpost.com/news/ke...