Thursday, November 2, 2017


 Suspect was heard yelling ‘Allahu akbar’
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
A suspected terror attack Tuesday left eight people dead, and at least 15 people injured in lower Manhattan, according to reports.
Police arrested 29-year-old Tampa, Florida resident Sayfullo Saipov – an Uzbek national – who they believe drove a Home Depot rental truck onto a hike and bike path in the neighborhood of Tribeca and rammed into a school bus.
Several witnesses reported the man, who reports initially claimed fired shots, yelled, “Allahu akbar!” during the attack.

Watch eyewitness video below (Warning: Graphic Content):

NYPD officers shot and apprehended the suspect, who was carrying a B.B. gun or a pellet gun, in addition to a paintball gun.
The FBI announced they’ll investigate the event as a terror attack, after first characterizing the incident as potential “road rage.”

Tribeca is one of the most expensive neighborhoods in Manhattan, and is home to unique architecture associated with the city.
This mass killing event comes just a month after the Mandalay Bay massacre, the deadliest mass shooting in the U.S. that left 59 dead and hundreds injured.
President Trump issued the following statements on Twitter:
The president also commented on the possibility the attack may have been inspired by the radical Islamic terror group ISIS, who recently called for October 31 Halloween attacks.
 Horror: Raw Footage of NYC Terror Attack Shows School Bus Wreckage
Horror: Raw Footage of NYC Terror Attack Shows School Bus Wreckage

Islamic terror attack resulted in 8 deaths


republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 Footage from the scene of the New York City terror attack Monday
 that resulted in 8 deaths and 15 injuries shows the damage inflicted on
 a school bus that was hit by the attacker’s vehicle.
NYC “Allahu akbar” truck jihad mass murderer 
identified as Sayfullo Saipov from Uzbekistan
 NYC truck jihad death toll now eight, 
“Middle Eastern man” arrested
 CNN: NYC truck driver/gunman screamed 
“Allahu akbar,” now attack IS being investigated 
as terrorism
 Bloodbath in NYC: Van driver runs down several 
people, shoots pedestrians, cops say 
not terror-related
 NY Governor Cuomo on NYC jihad massacre: 
No evidence to suggest wider plot, 
“no ongoing threat”
 Terror Attack Kills 8 and Injures 11 in Manhattan
 NYPD monitored jihad murderer Saipov’s mosque 
until Linda Sarsour convinced them to stop
 De Blasio: “Last thing we should do is start 
casting dispersions [sic] on whole races of people 
or whole religions”
 President Trump's EXPLOSIVE Response to NY 
Truck Attack: "Send Him to Gitmo!" 11/1/17
 "Allahu Akbar!" Terror Strikes New York City
Breaking: Islamic Terror Attack In Manhattan
Truck Terror: Jihadist Mows Down Innocents 
Manhattan Attack Is A Product Of 
Uncontrolled Immigration
NYC Terror Reveals Omni-Surveillance 
& Govt’s Insatiable Demand For More
NYPD Press Conference On Bloody ISIS Attack
Infowars Reporter On Scene Of Deadly 
NYC Terror Attack



republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
It seems America and the free world have been universally bullied, badgered, blackmailed into believing that Islam is a peaceful religion but the event this week in New York City proved otherwise. Every true Muslim is obligated to do his or her part in destroying free people as they build a world caliphate. Consequently, committed Muslims who worship and follow the Koran cannot be mainstreamed. Freedom and democracy are foreign concepts to them.
Islam is on a world crusade to subvert every nation and bring everyone under sharia. Anyone who challenges that fact is disingenuous, delusional, or dumb as a box of rocks. It is folly to challenge truth since it always prevails–sooner or later. Progressives and even Evangelical Christians haven’t learned that truth.
I have interviewed numerous Muslims all over the world and have written two books on the subject to document Islam’s world crusade.

Committed Muslims cannot be trusted. They are permitted to lie to further the cause of Islam. Being doubted and questioned makes it very difficult for non-fanatical Muslims to function in a free society since they are lumped along with the fanatics.
My emails and phone calls from hate-filled Muslims supports my contention and proves their mindset. From the beginning of one of my critic’s missives, I assumed we were not going to be friends. He wrote, “You are a hater and a bigot not because you ‘revealed the facts about Islam’ but because you are a complete dishonest, lying corrupt scum!” He was responding to my article dealing with Muslims having permission to lie if it furthers the cause of Islam. Being very perceptive, I assumed I was not one of his favorite persons.
A number of Koran and Hadith passages establish the religious authority of breaking oaths, lying, unilaterally violating treaties, and generally scheming against non-Muslims. It is not unfair or untruthful or unchristian to say that no Muslim can be trusted because of this doctrine of permissive lying known as Taqiyya!
A good example of Islamic lying is seen in the life of Mohammed who gave permission to one of his disciples to lie to facilitate the murder of a poet who had angered him: a follower asked Mohammed, “Would you like that I kill him?” Mohammed told him he would.
The follower said, “Then allow me to say a (false) thing i.e. to deceive Kab.”
Mohammed replied, “You may say it.” There, Mohammed approved lying and murder. (Sahih al-Bukhari 5.369.)
Mohammed authorized lying according to Bukhari, vol. 4, book 52, numbers 268–271 because “war is deceit” as a justification for him murdering unarmed prisoners after promising them safe passage. True Islam is evil with skin.
Bukhari (3:49:857) reveals, “He who makes peace between the people by inventing good information or saying good things, is not a liar.” Muslims can “invent” information to advance Islam.
Bukhari also reveals that Muhammad said if he took an oath and later found something else better, he would do “what is better” and expiate his oath. Now you know how Muslim leaders say one thing in America or Europe and go back to their Muslim nations and say the opposite while speaking in Arabic.
There are three circumstances where lying is permitted by Muslims: “in battle, for bringing reconciliation amongst persons and the narration of the words of the husband to his wife, and the narration of the words of a wife to her husband (in a twisted form in order to bring reconciliation between them)” (Book 32, Number 6303).
The Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) insists that it “has not now or ever been involved with the Muslim Brotherhood, or supported any covert, illegal, or terrorist activity or organization.” The truth is that ISNA was, in fact, created by the Muslim Brotherhood. Moreover, they have financially supported Hamas terrorists. At least nine of their leaders have been accused by prosecutors of supporting terrorism.
I am accused of not providing verses from the Koran that support Muslims’ lying, but the following prove my contention of Islam’s deception, duplicity, and dishonesty.
Allah tells his followers that they are released from liability to unbelievers. Sura 9:3 reveals, “And an announcement from Allah and His Messenger to the people on the day of the greater pilgrimage that Allah and His Messenger are free from liability to the idolaters.” In other words, unbelievers don’t deserve fair and honest responses that Muslims deserve.
“Allah will not call you to account for thoughtlessness in your oaths, but for the intention in your hearts; and He is Oft-forgiving, Most Forbearing” (surah 2:225). Therefore, Muslims don’t have to be faithful to their oaths and Mohammed was an excellent example who broke his word and treaties whenever it benefited him.
Verse 226 deals with a man who takes an oath about not having sex with his wife (Al-‘lia) for a certain time but if he changes his mind, the oath is forgiven and he is released from his word.
“Allah hath made lawful for you (Muslims) absolution from your oaths (of such a kind), and Allah is your Protector. He is the Knower, the Wise” (surah 66:2).
Mohammed’s lying is the best example Muslims have to validate lying under certain circumstances. A quote from my book, ISLAM: America’s Trojan Horse! proves that Mohammed was a liar (who was also a thief, killer, slaver, and child molester): “With every month, Mohammed grew stronger as more converts showed up at his tent. (Ladies, loot, and land will do that.) Now was the time to take Mecca for good. A treaty was made between the leaders of Mecca and Mohammed whereby he and his followers could make the pilgrimage to the Kaaba; Mohammed could ‘preach some revivals’ but could not engage in any forced conversions. However, true to his lack of character, Mohammed broke the treaty within a year since he believed it was legitimate to fake a peace when you are weak so that you can smash your enemy when you are eventually strong.”
Mohammed was a liar and gave permission for his followers to lie to advance Islam. That lying is going on today to advance sharia in America.
Furthermore, surah 3:54, 8:30, and 10:21, reveal that Allah is “the best deceiver”!
If your god cannot be trusted, then you are in big trouble! Can you be sure you will have 72 virgins after all!
Boys’ new book Muslim Invasion: The Fuse is Burning! was published by Barbwire Books; to get your copy, click here. An eBook edition is also available.


republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
SALT LAKE CITY — The University of Utah Hospital nurse who was dragged out screaming and placed in handcuffs for explaining to a police detective that he needed a warrant to withdraw blood from an unconscious crash victim has agreed to a $500,000 payment from Salt Lake City and the University of Utah to settle the matter.
“There will be no lawsuit,” Karra Porter, attorney for nurse Alex Wubbels told reporters on Tuesday.
According to the Salt Lake Tribune, Wubbels will use part of the money to provide legal help to others seeking to obtain body camera footage of incidents such as hers, and will also donate some of the settlement payment to the Utah Nurses Association. She will additionally help to lead a campaign to stop nurse abuse in America.
“We all deserve to know the truth and the truth comes when you see the actual raw footage and that’s what happened in my case,” she said during the news conference. “No matter how truthful I was in telling my story, it was nothing compared to what people saw and the visceral reaction people experienced when watching the footage of the experience that I went through.”

As previously reported, the matter began on on July 26, as Utah Highway Patrol was involved in a chase with driver Marcos Torres, 26, in Cache County after he was reported for driving recklessly. Torres soon crossed into oncoming traffic and smashed into a semi head-on, which was driven by 43-year-old William Gray. The truck burst into flames.
While Torres died from his injuries on the scene, Gray, who works as a reserve police officer when not driving semis, was transported to University of Utah Hospital, where he was treated for severe burns.
Salt Lake Police Detective Jeff Payne later arrived at the hospital’s burn unit to request samples of Gray’s blood to determine if he had drugs in his system, as directed by another agency. However, on-duty nurse Alex Wubbels explained to Payne that he needed to meet one of three conditions as per the police department’s agreement with the hospital: 1) obtain consent from the patient 2) obtain a warrant or 3) the patient must be under arrest.

As Gray was not under arrest since he was the victim in the incident, and as he was in a comatose state and was therefore not able to give consent, Wubbels outlined to Payne that he would need to obtain an electronic warrant. She proceeded to contact numerous supervisors to ask what to do about the situation.
Becoming unhappy with her answers, Detective Payne repeatedly threatened that he was going to arrest Wubbels and take her to jail.
“I either go away with blood in vials or body in tow,” he warned.
With another staff member at her side to provide assistance, Wubbels soon printed out the hospital policy for blood draws and read it to Payne, advising him that he needs to meet one of the three conditions.
“This is something that you guys agreed to with this hospital,” she explained calmly.
Wubbels also placed one of the supervisors on speaker phone to talk to Payne about the matter himself.
“The patient can’t consent, he’s told me repeatedly that he doesn’t have a warrant, and the patient is not under arrest,” she explained to the supervisor. “I’m just trying to do what I’m supposed to do, that’s all.”
“So, I take it [that] without those in place, I’m not going to get blood. Am I fair to surmise that?” Payne asked.
The supervisor, who advised Wubbels that she was simply relaying the information, then asked Payne why he was “blaming the messenger,” and he replied that it was because she was the one who was denying his request.
The supervisor then warned Payne sternly, “Sir, you’re making a huge mistake because you’re threatening a nurse.”

Payne snapped.
“We’re done!” he declared, grabbing for Wubbels phone. “You’re under arrest!”
She backed away from the officer, but Payne continued to move toward Wubbels and within seconds, he physically grabbed the nurse and forced her out the door.
“Somebody help me! Stop! Stop! I did nothing wrong!” she exclaimed, screaming. “You’re assaulting me! Stop!”
Other hospital employees tried to reason with Payne, who handcuffed Wubbles, but to no avail.
“She’s under arrest,” Payne said.
“For doing her job?” the employee asked.
“I’ve done my job; she’s done hers,” Payne replied.
View a video of the incident released by the Salt Lake Tribune here.
Wubbles was released 20 minutes later, and was not charged with any crime.
According to the Salt Lake Tribune, Payne outlined in a report on the incident that he had been advised by Lt. James Tracy, the commander on duty that evening, to arrest Wubbles for interfering with a police investigation if she declined to allow him to take the blood sample. He said that he had been told that “implied consent” was sufficient.
However, on Oct. 10, Salt Lake City Police Chief Michael Brown fired Payne, and Tracy was also demoted from lieutenant to officer. Both have filed an appeal, contending that the punishment is excessive.
According to the Salt Lake Tribune, Payne’s attorney, Greg Skordas, says that federal DOT law mandates a blood sample whenever a driver with a CDL license is involved in a fatal crash. Therefore, in obtaining the CDL, one is giving their implied consent.
However, Porter, Wubbels’ attorney, argues that the blood draw is actually the employer’s responsibility and not that of police, and that Utah law specifically requires that the person be suspected of being intoxicated, which Gray was not.
Following the incident, Payne was initially suspended from the police department’s draw program, which trains officers in phlebotomy so that they can draw the blood themselves for investigations.
“To date, we have suspended the officer from the blood draw program. We have already replaced our blood draw policy with a new policy,” Brown outlined on Sept. 1. “All remaining officers on the blood draw program have reviewed, and are operating under the new policy and protocol.”
Payne was later fired altogether, and also lost his part-time job with a paramedics company for being caught on camera stating that he would bring the hospital “all the transients and take the good patients elsewhere.”
Tracy says that he was not aware that the police department had an agreement with the hospital.
“Lt. Tracy was operating under an outmoded policy and one that was clearly inconsistent with state law when it came to drawing blood from unconscious or deceased accident victims,” his appeal reads. “He had been given no training in the new policy and had no reason to believe he could deviate from the policy he believed to be in effect at the time.”
William Gray, the man from whom Payne sought to obtain blood, died on Sept. 25.
 Violent Cop - Canned for Evil Act - 
Cries About Being Treated Unfairly!

 Full-Page NY Times Ad Demands Antifa Revolution 
to Overthrow Trump
 Coup against Trump ad appears in NY Times’ national edition
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
The New York Times published a full-page ad calling for a “revolution” to overthrow President Trump on Nov. 4.
The ad, which appears near the front of the newspaper’s national edition, demands nationwide protests that won’t stop until the Trump administration is “driven from power.”

“Join with the thousands who will gather in cities and towns across the country,” reads the ad. “A movement of protests that continue every day and night, growing until we become millions… determined now to stop until this regime is driven from power.”
The ad was written by Refuse Fascism, a communist group funded by George Soros which took responsibility for shutting down a conservative event hosting journalist Milo Yiannopoulos at UC Berkeley in Feb.
It’s ironic how the Times, which operates under the press protections guaranteed by the First Amendment, sold ad space to a group which bragged about denying First Amendment rights to a journalist.

The Times was already under fire for its bias against the Trump administration as revealed by a series of sting videos produced by Project Veritas, which caught the newspaper’s editors discussing how they help set up the media’s anti-Trump narrative.
“I think that one of the things that maybe journalists were thinking about is, like, ‘Oh, if we write about [Trump], about how, like, insanely crazy he is and how ludicrous his policies are, then maybe people will read about it and be, like, ‘Oh, wow, like, we shouldn’t vote for him,’’” the Times’ homepage editor Desiree Shoe said on hidden camera.

The attitudes of the Times’ staff, combined with the Refuse Fascism ad, underscore how the establishment newspaper is not as “professionally neutral” as it claims to be.
MORE Videos: Resistance News
Soros: Puppet Master Of Antifa
 George Soros has unleashed his army of communist lackeys 
to try and destroy America.

NY Times Promotes Antifa-Communist Coup Effort Against Trump for Nov. 4 



republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

“This Nightmare Must End: THE TRUMP/PENCE REGIME MUST GO!”

So declare the opening lines of a full-page advertisement in the New York Times promoting mayhem and insurrection for this Saturday, November 4.
“Nov. 4 It Begins,” the ad continues. “Join with the thousands who will gather in cities and towns across the country. A movement of protests that continue every day and night, growing until we become millions… determined now to stop until this regime is driven from power.” (See the full ad below.)
The advertisement directs readers to go to, “To Find a Protest Near You.” At the website, information on planned Nov. 4 “protests” can be found for Boston, Chicago, Atlanta, Cincinnati, Austin, Seattle, Portland, Los Angeles, New York City, Omaha, and other cities.
The New York Times, of course, knows — even if many of its readers do not — that Refuse Fascism is a front group founded and run by the Revolutionary Communist Party (RCP), a violent Marxist-Leninist group that idolizes China’s Communist mass-murderer Mao Zedong. Which makes the Refuse Fascism appeal to “humanity” doubly ludicrous and doubly offensive. “NO! IN THE NAME OF HUMANITY WE REFUSE TO ACCEPT A FASCIST AMERICA!”, the ad declares.

“In the name of humanity”? The Revolutionary Communist Party/Refuse Fascism fanatics still believe that Mao was fully justified in murdering tens of millions of Chinese and torturing, imprisoning, and enslaving hundreds of millions more. The RCP/Refuse Fascism cadres form a major component of the masked, black-clad Antifa thugs who have been rioting and causing mayhem throughout America for the past year.
The New American’s Mitchell Shaw reported on September 30 about the upcoming November 4 “protests” planned by the Antifa/RCP communists. We have already seen these “protests” and the death, destruction, and turmoil they have left in their wakes. Why is the New York Times helping a known communist group — one with both a long history of violence as well as recent involvement in riots, sedition, and other criminal acts — promote havoc and the overthrow of a validly elected president of the United States?
It’s no secret that the New York Times has been pro-communist for over a century. From covering up Stalin’s genocide of millions of Ukrainians to helping make Fidel Castro the dictator of Cuba, to glorifying Mao Zedong, to romanticizing communist Weather Underground terrorist Bill Ayers — and much, much more, the Times has been foremost among media organizations promoting communism worldwide. In fact, this year, in celebration of the hundredth anniversary of the Bolshevik Revolution, the Times has run an appalling series of articles under the heading “Red Century” that wistfully pine for the romantic era of the gulag and the Lubyanka.
This is not the first time that the Times has aided the RCP/Refuse Fascism communists by running an ad for their subversive operations. As we reported in January, the Times ran a similar full-page ad for RCP/Refuse Fascism to gin up support for the mayhem that was unleashed on President Donald Trump’s inauguration.

Related articles:


  Medical Destruction By The Numbers 
 Jon Rappoport hosts the fourth hour of the Alex Jones show and reveals how the medical industry is being used to slow kill America.
 Pro-Vaxers Debunk THIS! - Vaccination Truth 
w/ Dr. Suzanne Humphries
 One day, should the Lord tarry and man does not fully revert to the Dark Ages, mankind will one day look back at the vaccination agenda of our age as we look back at blood-letting. A day when doctors will understand that vaccination is based on agenda-driven speculation, opinion, grand assumptions, and lies repeated and repeated until they become truth in the ears of those conditioned not to question the voices of authority of our "civilized" control system, NOT real science. Dr. Humphries gives a pretty good overview of several of the real, and scientifically-demonstrable problems with vaccinations. Judge for yourself. But you owe it to you and your kids to make an INFORMED choice. There is one side that tries to shame and coerce your choice in this very important matter. That vaccines are being MANDATED should tell any thoughtful soul how (un)effective they are.
 Bigger Than JFK Files: HHS Vaccine Harm Covered-Up
 Del Bigtree, producer of VAXXED, joins David Knight blow the whistle on misconduct by HHS (Health & Human Services). When the federal govt took away our right to sue vaccine companies, giving them liability immunity, HHS was tasked as the sole means of protecting the public. But they don’t test vaccines like drugs are tested, they don’t allow discovery in their “court”, they don’t even keep records of those injured. The cover-up is bigger than JFK and may cost you and your children your health, even your life. 


republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 RIVERSIDE, Calif. — A superior court judge in California has ruled that a state 
law requiring pro-life pregnancy centers to provide information about 
government abortion programs runs afoul of the California Constitution.
“Here, the State commands clinics to post specific directions for whom to contact to obtain an abortion. It forces the clinic to point the way to the abortion clinic and can leave patients with the belief they were referred to an abortion provider by that clinic. … In Scharpen’s case that would be inaccurate, profoundly inaccurate,” wrote Judge Gloria Trask.
She said that there are other ways for the government to get its message out besides forcing those who are opposed to abortion to provide the information.
“Compelled speech must be subject to reasonable limitation,” Trask said. “The statute compels the clinic to speak words with which it profoundly disagrees when the state has numerous alternative methods of publishing its message. … In this case, however virtuous the State’s ends, they do not justify its means.”

As previously reported, in 2014, Gov. Jerry Brown signed the Reproductive FACT Act into law, a measure that has been dubbed the “bully bill” by pro-life groups in the state. The bill had been authored by Democratic Assemblyman David Chiu, who outlined in the law that he takes issue with pregnancy centers that don’t provide abortion referrals to women.
“The author contends that, unfortunately, there are nearly 200 licensed and unlicensed clinics known as crisis pregnancy centers (CPCs) in California whose goal is to interfere with women’s ability to be fully informed and exercise their reproductive rights, and that CPCs pose as full-service women’s health clinics, but aim to discourage and prevent women from seeking abortions,” it reads.
The legislation therefore requires that licensed pregnancy care centers provide the following message to clients in print: “California has public programs that provide immediate free or low-cost access to comprehensive family planning services (including all FDA-approved methods of contraception), prenatal care, and abortion, for eligible women. To determine whether you qualify, contact the county social services office at (telephone number).”

But Scott Scharpen, pastor at Rock Valley Christian Church in Murietta and founder of Go Mobile for Life, said that he could not comply with the requirement and therefore went to court to challenge the law. Go Mobile for Life operates a mobile pregnancy center that provides free ultrasounds to women.
“I will not post that notice in our clinic. I would rather close the clinic than post that notice,” he said in a statement released by his attorneys with Advocates for Faith and Freedom. “Now, by law, we are required to provide referral information to a woman for services that we find morally and ethically objectionable, namely abortion.”
“If the California state government gets away with telling pregnancy clinics what to say and even how to say it, then ALL faith-based businesses are at risk of being bullied into delivering the government’s mandated speech,” Scharpen stated. “We must stand up and fight this unconstitutional law for the benefit of all people!”
On Monday, Judge Trask ruled in favor of Scharpen, declaring that “[t]he legislature may not use the wall of the physician’s office as a billboard to advertise the availability of low cost abortions.” She declared the Reproductive FACT Act to be in violation of Article 1, Section 2 of the California Constitution, which reads, “Every person may freely speak, write and publish his or her sentiments on all subjects, being responsible for the abuse of this right. A law may not restrain or abridge liberty of speech or press.”
Scharpen applauded the ruling, which he characterized as a “huge victory for free speech.”
“The whole notion of being compelled to share information with our patients about abortion availability, which is contrary to our mission and purpose, is fundamentally wrong. Lives will be saved because of this ruling,” he said.


republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
In another example of how we’ve become a government of, by, and for judges, a federal judge has blocked President Trump’s reinstitution of the ban on Made-up Sexual Status (so-called transgender) individuals serving in the military. Strangely, the ban had been in place for more than 50 years when Barack Obama overturned it last year, yet it wasn’t found “unconstitutional” until Trump decided to return to the long-held status quo.
The opinion was handed down by U.S. District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly in Washington, who stated in a 76-page decision that as “far as the court is aware at this preliminary stage, all of the reasons proffered by the president for excluding transgender individuals from the military in this case were not merely unsupported, but were actually contradicted by the studies, conclusions and judgment of the military itself.” 
This outrageous example of judicial activism reflects the earlier blocks of Trump’s travel bans, in which a judge — ignoring a 1952 law stating that the president may “suspend the entry of … any class of aliens” — claimed that the government hadn’t shown good reason for such a ban. The court’s rationale, in part, was that there hadn’t been any terrorist attacks perpetrated by individuals from the ban-affected nations.

Not only did this claim overlook overseas attacks by such people, as well as other factors (as I explained here), but since when does the president need to prove a policy’s validity to a black-robed lawyer?
A judge’s place is only to determine if a law or action is constitutional, not whether it’s a “good idea.” Yet because power corrupts, judges' judicial supremacy and Congress' failure to use its constitutionally granted power to check the courts have begotten an ever-more-brazen judiciary.
The 2015 Obergefell decision is another good example of judicial usurpation, with Justice Anthony Kennedy justifying an opinion mandating nationwide same-sex “marriage” recognition with the notion that the children of same-sex couples cannot wait for the social change that would allow their guardians to “marry”; it must happen now. (Of course, not long ago many leftists, fashionably cynical about tradition, claimed they didn’t need a “piece of paper” to validate their relationship; now they absolutely cannot do without it.)
So many judges today are just making it up as they go along, and this is no laughing matter. For they’re literally endangering our Republic — by undermining our system of checks and balances.
In fact, their judicial supremacy — the notion that the courts are the ultimate arbiters of law’s meaning and that their judgments must constrain all three governmental branches — has made them supremely dangerous.
Consider: As Dr. Alan Keyes explained in 2005, they have their judicial power. Yet if they can strike down laws, contrary to the legislature’s will, they’ve also arrogated to themselves the legislative power. And if they can tell the chief executive that an action must or mustn’t be executed, then they’ve arrogated to themselves the executive power as well. Now note what James Madison, the “Father of the Constitution,” said about having the executive, legislative, and judicial powers all in one entity’s hands: It is the very definition of tyranny.
Note, too, that we elect legislators and a president to, respectively, create and execute our laws. Having this outsourced to unelected lawyers makes a sham of our representative Republic, reducing us to a government of, by, and for judges. It’s the tyranny of an oligarchy.
Yet there are solutions. As referenced earlier, Congress could bring the courts to heel. Under the Constitution’s Article III, Congress can eliminate any and every federal court, except for the Supreme Court; and can limit the appellate jurisdiction of the SCOTUS, meaning, SCOTUS’ ability to hear cases brought up through lower courts. It thus could mostly eliminate judicial review.
Why doesn’t Congress do this? Because it means taking a stand on contentious issues and possibly suffering electoral consequences. It’s far easier for legislators to just posture, puff up their chests, and then throw up their hands saying, “Hey, we tried. But the courts have ruled!” This brings no electoral consequences because most Americans don’t know civics and are never aware that Congress is shirking its power-balancing duty.
Yet there is one more remedy. The president and governors could simply ignore unconstitutional (unlawful) court rulings. After all, “judicial supremacy” is not in the Constitution. Rather, it’s an extra-constitutional power declared by the courts themselves, notably in the 1803 Marbury v. Madison decision.
In other words, the courts gave the courts their trump-card power.
It’s a great con if you can pull it off.
Thomas Jefferson noted judicial supremacy’s danger early on, warning in 1819 that its acceptance would make the Constitution an “act of suicide.”
So contrary to the common misconception, a president who ignores usurpative courts isn’t violating the law, but defending it; he’s not sparking a “constitutional crisis” but  responding to one — one already sparked by rogue judges.
It would be nice if President Trump could thus assert his executive authority, but there’s a catch: It likely would serve as a pretext for impeaching him. After all, rampant ignorance ensures everyone would think that instead of ignoring the rule of lawyers, he was actually violating the rule of law. It’s a testimonial to the thoroughness of the judicial con and a great example of truth turned on its head. 



republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
ISIS has threatened to kill Prince George on a social media platform labelled by cyber-security experts as a “breeding ground” for terrorists.
So Britain is now furious, as it should be, but the key point is that citizens of the UK appear to be surprised, when they should not be.
There was a national outcry on social media as the news broke of the sick plot. Britons took to twitter to declare their outrage. One wrote: “There are threats to kill Prince George?! Wtf he’s just a child!!! What is wrong with some people?!”
Jihadists are killing machines. Men, women, children and the elderly are all fair game for slaughter when it comes to the infidels and apostates. The Islamic State blew up a baby in a training exercise and fed a Yazidi young woman her own baby, cooked.
Yet this same Britain that is mortified about the threat to the life of toddler Prince George has allowed the Islamic State to infiltrate its own country.
M15 recently announced the highest ever threat alert; up to 23,000 jihadists are on UK soil, as opposed to 3,000, as had been recently revealed.
Wake up, Britain! Unfortunately the shock expressed about Prince George will likely not change a thing in the UK with regards to their appeasement of Islamic supremacists.
“He’s a CHILD!’ Britain FURIOUS as ISIS ‘threatens to KILL Prince George at school’”, by Thomas Mickie, Express, October 27, 2017:
Using the encrypted instant messaging app Telegram the terrorists said: “Even the royal family will not be left alone.”
The brain-washed ISIS followers chilling added a picture of Prince George next to his school, Thomas’s Battersea, in south London, according to the Daily Star Sunday.
There was a national outcry on social media as the news broke of the sick plot. Britons took to twitter to declare their outrage.
One wrote: “There are threats to kill Prince George?! Wtf he’s just a child!!! What is wrong with some people?!”
Another wrote: “Where is the National outrage at the discovery of a plot by ISIS to assassinate Prince George? What the f*** is wrong with this country?”
Milica Delrey said: “I hope Prince George is safe and sound, he is just a little child, damn.”
Stephen Curl said: “A plot to kill any child is evil”.
Alex Bus wrote on Twitter: “Some twisted people about. Wanting to murder a child.
“I pray and hope nothing that sickening ever happens to our Prince George.”
The four-year-old’s photo was posted on the messaging app with the caption “school starts early”.
The vile post also included Arabic words taken from a jihadi song which translates as “when war comes with the melody of bullets, we descend on disbelief, desiring retaliation”
British intelligence have been heavily monitoring the anonymous messaging service in an effort to stop potential terror attacks in the UK.
Cyber-security experts said it it was critical to keep monitoring the service and warned the Telegram app was a “breeding ground” for terrorists.
Barry Spielman, whose internet surveillance company, Sixgill, has been tracking Telegram channels since the start of the year, said: “Our intelligence suggests that these threats are to be taken seriously.
“Over the last 12 months, we have seen both official and non-official Isis channels move over to Telegram.
“It’s an encrypted platform, making it a lot safer to communicate without being traced.
“We used to just track the Dark Web and Deep Web but now we are tracking Telegram.”
It comes as people living and working near the future king’s school have also raised concerns about security at Thomas’s Battersea after a woman filmed herself walking through the corridors unchallenged.
Sarah Burnett-Moore walked into the £17,600-a-year private school, days before the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge’s four-year-old son started on September 7th.
“It seems that as ISIS continues to lose ground in Syria and Iraq, it has stepped up its threats to hit the West.
“This threat to Prince George is chilling.
“We have also seen evidence terrorists are planning a strike at the World Cup in Russia.
“These are very worrying times and it is critical we try to uncover these plots.
“Telegram is where many of them are being hatched as we speak.”
Meanwhile, a British Muslim convert, Jack Letts has been charged with being a member of ISIS after being captured in Syria……..