Monday, June 20, 2016




University Founded by Methodist Church to Offer Sex Change Surgeries to Students
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

NASHVILLE – A private university in Tennessee that was founded by the Methodist Church will soon begin covering transgender-related surgeries under its student insurance plans, drawing sharp criticism from a local congresswoman.
Vanderbilt University is a private school in Nashville, Tennessee. For the first 40 years of its existence, Vanderbilt was under the auspices of the Methodist Episcopal Church, South. However, the school and the church severed their ties with each other in 1914.
According to a report from Vanderbilt’s student newspaper, the school will soon begin covering transgender-related surgeries under the student insurance plan. Medical documentation obtained by Christian News Network shows that the operations will be covered just like “any other eligible service” once the policy goes into effect at the beginning of the 2016-2017 school year, meaning students will not have to pay for the surgeries out of pocket.
Over 70 colleges and universities across the U.S. currently provide similar services to their students. Evidently, a small number of activists at Vanderbilt convinced university officials to include sex-change surgeries in the insurance plan.
“The change was proposed by Dr. Louise Hanson, director of the Vanderbilt student health center, after she met with several student patients who wanted to pursue the operations but couldn’t afford them,” the student newspaper’s report said.
Hanson said she was upset that some students could not afford sex-change surgeries and urged the university to finance the operations.
“It came out of feeling limited in our ability to take full and complete care of our transgender students,” Hanson told The Tennessean. “It really came out of our frustration.”
Cynthia Cyrus, vice provost for learning and residential affairs at Vanderbilt, was part of the committee that considered Hanson’s proposal. She said they swiftly approved the proposition without much deliberation.
“It was relatively non-controversial on our side,” Cyrus said, according to reports. “It was maybe a two-paragraph conversation, not deeply debated in any way.”
Although university officials are downplaying the controversial nature of the policy change, at least one local lawmaker is criticizing the school’s decision. In a statement on her website, U.S. Representative Diane Black said the move lacks common sense.
“Let’s be honest, this decision is not about the health and well being of Vanderbilt University students, it is about the political agenda of liberal university administrators,” said Black, who represents Tennessee’s 6th Congressional District. “Our institutions of higher learning exist to graduate students who are career ready and are prepared to compete in the global economy, not to play politics by providing insurance coverage of medically unnecessary procedures while raking in federal grants.”
“With this stunt, Vanderbilt University has shown itself to be completely out of touch with the values of most Tennesseans, and has surely alienated more than a few students, parents, and donors,” she continued. “I’m especially concerned that, by the university’s own admission, this decision was ‘not deeply debated in any way’—showing just how little thought went in to such a far-reaching policy. For all the advanced degrees that exist among Vanderbilt University’s senior administration, there is a painfully obvious lack of common sense.”



ISIS Is Obama's Proxy Army
Published on Jun 19, 2016
Alex Jones breaks down how Russian commanders have confirmed that the U.S. is 
deliberately “fighting to lose” against ISIS and the Al-Nusra Front in Syria, whilst 
secretly propping them up in order to weaken and oust President Assad.

GET A GUN! Justice w/ Judge Jeanine Opening Statement 6/18/16



SEE: below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

America’s parents may not like what I am about to say, but they need to give serious consideration to it. We have made some serious decisions regarding our children over the years under the direction of our government and others. We have sent our children to school for “strangers” to manipulate; listened to big Pharma along with the government create health problems when there were none to force medication and vaccinations; allowed our children to live in front of the “boob tube” rather than play outside and using the ads to make them overweight and have you buy them whatever they wanted.
Darn it – if you aren’t willing to give up 18 years of your own personal life for each child you have – then you shouldn’t have any. And NO I am NOT going to pay for your birth control!
I guess it wasn’t bad enough to ruin our children’s futures through their education - the power’s to be had to have back-up systems in place to make sure the goal of “total indoctrination” was completed by a certain date. Heck, most in college these days don’t know the names of the capitals of the 50 states or who their President or Vice-President is. They can’t add or subtract without a calculator or computer and respect – they have none for themselves let alone others.
I have talked in the past about Monsanto and how the Federal government has allowed them to taint our food, not have to list the true contents on labels or tell us where a particular food came from (fish, shrimp, chicken and what country).
The government also created a world so that both Mom and Dad would almost be forced to work to survive – so then who was taking care of your children? Day Cares, schools and baby sitters – STRANGERS!
Medically the plan was all laid out too! In the 60’s and 70’s the push was for every time your child sneezed they were given Ampicillin. Ampicillin only works against bacteria; it does not treat viral infections like the common cold or help with a runny nose when a child is cutting a tooth. Erring on the side of caution certainly applies to giving your children medication.
Repeated use can cause a second infection or over time make a child allergic or build up a resistance to it. Use ampicillin with extreme caution in CHILDREN younger than 10 years old who have diarrhea or an infection of the stomach or bowel.
Years ago, if a kid was bored and didn’t listen well in class, he was considered lazy, a daydreamer or perhaps a bit rambunctious. These days, he’s labeled with a mental disorder. Teachers are quick to suggest testing, medication and that he or she is ADHD.
The CDC says 6.4 million kids ages 4-17 have been “diagnosed with ADHD” since 2011. And that stat doesn’t even include the 198,000 kids under age five who are taking ADHD drugs. Besides that, I guarantee you, these numbers are a lot higher today because every year the rates continue to skyrocket.
How can this be? You don’t suppose it could be a made up diagnosis just to get your child “drugged up”? Retired Harvard psychologist, Dr. Jerome Kagan states ADHD is an invention – a made up invention for every child in school who isn’t doing well. Send him to see his physician and the physician prescribes Ritalin. Kagan stated, “In fact, 90 percent of these kids don’t have an abnormal dopamine metabolism. The problem is, if a drug is available to doctors, they’ll make the corresponding diagnosis.”
Even child psychiatry researcher Leon Eisenberg who is identified as the “inventor” and “founding father” of AHA/ADD stated in an interview with Der Spiegel seven months before his death in 2009, “ADHD is a prime example of a fictitious disease.”
As far back as 1998, Dr. Edward C. Hamlyn, founding member of the Royal College of General Practitioners stated, “ADHD is fraud – intended to justify starting children on a life of drug addiction.”
Three facts you should know:
 ADHD medications are dangerous
 ADHD cannot be proven
 Drug companies aggressively push the sale of Ritalin and the ADHD diagnosis.
Even Roger Griggs, the pharmaceutical executive who introduced Adderall in 1994, said he strongly opposes marketing stimulants to the general public because of their dangers. He calls them ‘nuclear bombs,’ warranted only under extreme circumstances and when carefully overseen by a physician.
FACT: At least 31 school shootings and/or school-related acts of violence have been committed by those taking or withdrawing from psychiatric drugs. Take a child off of Ritalin instantly rather than gradually, and see what happens.
Good news for parents is if you have a child who often behaves in ways listed on the ADHD list, there’s a much safer and more promising way to help your kids!
Get as far away from the Standard American Diet (SAD) as you can. I could go on and on about the SAD – which I blame Big Food, Big Ag and Monsanto for – the sisters of Big Pharma. Thanks to our highly processed and addictive dead food choices, we’ve got people feeding their poor bodies loads of harmful, toxic junk. We eat things we are sensitive or allergic too.
We accumulate a build-up of GMOs, artificial sweeteners (aspartame, high fructose corn syrup, etc.), food dyes, preservatives, nitrates, hormones, antibiotics, MSG – and so on. Toxicity leads to inflammation in the gut. Inflammation in the gut leads to sickness and disease.
How about the rise in Autism?
Researchers at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine (AECM) have recently published a report that found “the average age of diagnosis for those born before 2005 was just under four years old; for those born during or after 2005, it was roughly two-and-a-half years old” and they are recommending universal screening.
Given the undisputed benefit of early identification of autism, sorting out the contribution of universal screening to this pattern will be an important next step to address the concerns of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force regarding the benefits of early screening.”
Meanwhile, researchers at the Milton S. Hershey Medical Center have published a study suggesting that children who live in areas where aerial pesticide spraying to kill mosquitoes have a “significantly higher rate of autism” than children in other areas.
Stephanie Seneff, PhD, has researched biology and technology over the years having published over 170 scholarly peer-reviewed articles. December 2014, Dr. Seneff made the surprising statement, “At today’s rate, by 2025, one in two children will be autistic.”
She noted that the side effects of autism closely mimic those of glyphosate toxicity, and presented data showing a remarkably consistent correlation between the use of Roundup on crops (and the creation of Roundup-ready GMO crop seeds) with rising rates of autism. Children with autism have biomarkers indicative of excessive glyphosate, including zinc and iron deficiency, low serum sulfate, seizures, and mitochondrial disorder.
Aerial dispersal of parathyroid pesticides are sprayed during summer months to maintain control over mosquito populations to reduce the instances of conditions they spread such as equine encephalitis. Steven Hicks, assistant professor of pediatrics for the MHMC explained: “Preventing mosquito-borne encephalitis is an important task, but suggests communities that have pesticide programs to help control the mosquito population might consider ways to reduce child pesticide exposure, including alternative application methods.”
A fellow panelist reported after Dr. Seneff’s presentation, “All of the 70 or so people in attendance were squirming, likely because they now had serious misgivings about serving their kids, or themselves, anything with corn or soy, which are nearly all genetically modified and thus tainted with Roundup and its glyphosate.”
Dr. Seneff noted the ubiquity of glyphosate’s use. Because it is used on corn and soy, all soft drinks and candies sweetened with corn syrup and all chips and cereals that contain soy fillers have small amounts of glyphosate in them, as do our beef and poultry since cattle and chicken are fed GMO corn or soy. Wheat is often sprayed with Roundup just prior to being harvested, which means that all non-organic bread and wheat products would also be sources of glyphosate toxicity. The amount of glyphosate in each product may not be large, but the cumulative effect (especially with as much processed food as Americans eat) could be devastating. A recent study shows that pregnant women living near farms where pesticides are applied have a 60% increased risk of children having an autism spectrum disorder.
In 2014 William W. Thompson, PhD, an epidemiologist at the CDC’s National Center of Birth Defects and Development Disabilities who received his doctorate in biochemical engineering, was been revealed as a CDC whistle blower. Thompson broke a decade of silence over the government’s deliberate concealment of the link between the MMR vaccine (for measles, mumps, and rubella) and dramatically increased risk of autism, particularly inAfrican American boys.
Thompson was alleging criminal wrongdoing on the part of his supervisors at the CDC and has expressed deep regret to the parents of America regarding his involvement in the cover-up.
 February 2004, a study on the MMR vaccine was published in the Journal of Pediatrics by three CDC scientists. The study gathered information on 2,583 children in Atlanta between 1986 and 1993 concluding, “there is no significant associations between the age at which the vaccine is administered and the incidence of “developmental regression” such as autism.”
 That same month, Dr. Thompson wrote to Dr. Julie Gerberding (then director of the CDC, now director of Merck’s vaccine division). In this letter he discusses his intention to present, at an Institute of Medicine meeting on vaccines and autism the following week, “several problematic results” that the Atlanta study had produced.
 For the next ten years, Dr. Brian Hooker, of the Focus Autism Foundation, tried to obtain the original data from that study. In 2014, through a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request, Dr. Hooker received much of the data. He was also allowed to view several highly sensitive documents related to the study thanks to a request from Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA), chair of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee.
 Thompson guided Hooker to evidence that there was a statistically significant relationship between the age at which the MMR vaccine was first given and the incidence of autism—particularly in African-American boys. Thompson revealed that CDC researchers did not include any children who did not have a valid State of Georgia birth certificate, thereby reducing the study’s sample size by 41%, which dramatically skewed the statistical findings. Thompson claimed this manipulation was intentional because of top-down pressure to promote a pro-vaccine agenda, and because of the CDC’s reluctance to address the vaccine-autism connection.
 Hooker presented his own research—a re-analysis of the original data—in a paper published August, 2015 in the peer-reviewed journal Translational Neurodegeneration. In African American boys who received the vaccine at 24 months of age (that is, “on schedule,” as opposed delaying the vaccine until 36 months or later), Hooker said the raw data shows the incidence of autism to be 340% higher. Dr. Hooker suggests the extraordinary vulnerability of young African American boys to autism from vaccinations may result from their low vitamin D levels, given their dark skin pigmentation. The prevalence of autism in African Americans is nearly 25% higher than that of whites. “The CDC knew about the relationship between the age of first MMR vaccine and autism incidence in African-American boys as early as 2003,” Hooker says, “but chose to cover it up.”
Has America forgotten that 4 years ago the CDC was caught in the “fear mongering” campaign over the West Nile Virus? We were told the West Nile Virus was spreading uncontrollably like “wildfire”. Even with the CDC admitting that only a “miniscule” of people have even a remote chance of contracting the virus, they pushed for mass spraying of cities around the country with toxic pesticides, and actively encouraged people to coat themselves in toxic DEET chemicals to deter mosquitoes.
DEET is an insect repellant chemical which if used in excess can cause damage to a person’s nervous system.
Scientists are willing to lie through their teeth in support of the big pharma and petro-chemical labs who sign their pay checks. Sounds a little like the untrustworthy Global Warming scientists.
Is the Zika virus lab made? The question is still being asked. Zika was first isolated in 1947 by scientists working for the Rockefeller Foundation. Zika was "discovered" in an experimental forest sentinel rhesus monkey that was being held in captivity.
Many people still wonder if Zika was created in the lab for experimental purposes. For decades, Zika transmission was extremely rare. The virus didn't start spreading until after 2012 – right after the biotech company Oxitec released genetically modified mosquitoes in masse in Brazil.
Of course the CDC is also in charge of the HPV vaccine being given to our Pre-teen, Teen and Adolescent girls. Reports you are seeing in support of the safety of Prevnar 13 are coming from drug reps. How many of our young girls have died after receiving this vaccine – over 100. Are you really willing to allow your daughter to be put in this “catch as catch can” game they are playing on the chance your daughter MIGHT get cervical cancer in the future?
Another 13 year old girl has died just 5 days after receiving the HPV vaccine after doctors dismissed her symptoms for a “bug” and even called her a “lazy” child before sending her home. And why are they giving these vaccinations at the schools???
Our girls are supposed to get their first dose between 11-12 years with a total of 3 shots over a 6 month period. Boys are receiving the vaccine as a preventative for genital warts. There have been a few cases of boys dying after having received the vaccine also. Joel Gomez 14, from California received a Merck Gardasil vaccine on June 19, 2013 and again on August 19, 2013, and died in his sleep the following day on August 20, 2013. A lawsuit against the USDOH states Gardasil® did cause or contributed to a myocardial infarction in the decedent, and that the second dose of Gardasil® finally caused a fatal hypotension on this case on the day of vaccination. There was no other plausible cause for the death of Joel Gomez at the night of August 20, 2013 as per his physician.
Cases such of this are becoming more common with the cause of death being related to a “cardiac malfunction” of some sort. [Link]
This weekend a most amazing documentary is being released around the country titled “Vaxxed” and it is the truth about vaccines and the dangers for our children. Most of the focus is on the MMR vaccine and you can find it at your local theater.
Initially, Robert De Niro was pushing this movie in full support and planned to include it in his Tribeca Film Festival. De Niro who has an autistic child caved under pressure from the CDC and big pharma to not show the film.
Michael Spector, a New Yorker medical journalist stated, this pressure is “shocking” and “disgraceful”. This is a criminal (CDC) that is responsible for people dying.”
This is a must see for everyone and it calls for the following:
1. That Congress subpoena Dr. William Thompson and investigate the CDC fraud.
2. That Congress repeal the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act and hold manufacturers liable for injury caused by their vaccines.
3. That the single measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine be made available immediately.
4. That all vaccines be classified as pharmaceutical drugs and tested accordingly.
5. That warnings be given to parents regarding the deaths following the HPV vaccinations.
Trailer here. [Link]


SEE: below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

If you think that Donald Trump already has the Republican nomination locked up, then you don’t understand what is going on behind the scenes.  It has long been my contention that the elite will move heaven and earth in order to keep Trump from ever setting foot in the Oval Office.  One way that they could try to do this is by attempting to deny him the nomination at the Republican convention next month.  Over the past couple of days, the Washington Post, CNN and a whole host of other mainstream news outlets have been reporting on a new “last-ditch effort” that has been launched by Republican operatives to get the Republican convention Rules Committee to unbind all of the delegates and allow them to vote however they want.  As you will see below, they can do this, and if they get enough votes they will do it.
This current effort is different from what we have seen so far during this campaign season, because it is actually being organized by the delegates themselves.  The following comes from the Washington Post
Dozens of Republican convention delegates are hatching a new plan to block Donald Trump at this summer’s party meetings, in what has become the most organized effort so far to stop the businessman from becoming the GOP presidential nominee.
The moves come amid declining poll numbers for Trump and growing concern among Republicans that he is squandering his chance to defeat Democrat Hillary Clinton. Several controversies — including his racial attacks on a federal judge, his renewed call to temporarily ban Muslims from entering the United States and his support for changing the nation’s gun laws — have raised fears among Republicans that Trump is not really a conservative and is too reckless to run a successful race.
This movement is being spearheaded by a delegate from Colorado named Kendal Unruh.  She is actually a key member of the Republican convention Rules Committee, and this is very important for reasons that I will explain below.
For her, it is not about getting some other specific candidate nominated.  Rather, the entire goal is simply to stop Donald Trump
This literally is an ‘Anybody but Trump’ movement,” said Kendal Unruh, a Republican delegate from Colorado who is leading the campaign. “Nobody has any idea who is going to step in and be the nominee, but we’re not worried about that. We’re just doing that job to make sure that he’s not the face of our party.
So what will it take for Unruh and her allies to be successful?
As Fox News explained, there are basically two courses of action…
To prevail, Unruh needs a majority of the 112 members of the convention rules committee, which has two delegates from each state and territory. Then, a majority of the full convention’s 2,472 delegates would have to approve.
There’s a Plan B. If Unruh can win over one-fourth support from the rules committee — just 29 delegates— the full convention must vote on her proposal. So far she’s got around 10 supporters though some prefer delaying the rule’s impact until the 2020 convention, she said.
On Thursday night, Unruh was on a conference call that included at least 30 delegates from 15 different states, and the Washington Post says that regional coordinators for this effort have been recruited “in Arizona, Iowa, Louisiana, Washington and other states.”
One individual that took part in this conference call on Thursday night told CNN that calls are pouring in from people all over the country that want to be part of this movement…
I will tell you, about every two hours people contact me about how to join this effort,” Lonegan said. “This has never been done before, so there’s no textbook on how to do it. So we’re building an organic effort, state by state, to convince members of the Rules Committee to sign onto a rule that unbinds the delegates to vote their moral conscience.”
So could the Republican convention Rules Committee actually do this?
Could they actually unbind all of the delegates and allow them to vote however they wished?
Well, yes they actually could do this.  As Time Magazine has explained, the Republican convention Rules Committee essentially has the power to make up any rules that they want…
It has the power to review and amend all of the rules of the Republican Party, pending ratification by the full convention. If it wanted to, it could insert a rule that says only candidates with blue hair could be the party’s nominee. It’s that powerful. In a contested scenario, the Rules Committee would be ground zero for fights over who and how candidates are nominated on the floor, as well as how the convention itself is conducted.
And thanks to political wrangling by the Cruz campaign, we do know that the rules committee is dominated by delegates that are loyal to Cruz
The convention rules committee is made up of one man and one woman from each of the 50 states, U.S. territories, and the District of Columbia. Dominated by party insiders and loyalists to Texas Sen. Ted Cruz—who aggressively worked state conventions to secure slots on the committee—it remains to be seen what the committee’s appetite would be for such a dramatic break from the existing rules.
If I was Donald Trump, I would be taking this very, very seriously.
But at this point he seems to be brushing it off …
“I have tremendous support and get the biggest crowds by far and any such move would not only be totally illegal but also a rebuke of the millions of people who feel so strongly about what I am saying,” Trump said in a statement. “People that I defeated soundly in the primaries will do anything to get a second shot — but there is no mechanism for it to happen.”
Right at this moment we still have about a month left before the convention.
So that gives those involved in the anti-Trump movement quite a bit of time to rally their forces.
The rule change that would unbind all of the delegates and free them up to “vote their consciences” has already been drafted.  Here is the text of the proposed rule change…
Preserving Delegates’ Ability to Vote Their Individual Conscience
The secretary of the national convention shall receive and faithfully announce and record each delegate’s vote in accordance with these rules. If any such delegate notifies the secretary of his or her intent to cast a vote of conscience, whether personal or religious, each such delegate shall be unbound and unconstrained by these rules on any given vote, including the first ballot for the selection of the Republican nominee for President of the United States, without the risk of challenge, sanction, or retribution by the Republican National Committee. Allowable personal reasons shall include the public disclosure of one or more grievous acts of personal conduct by a nominee candidate, including but not limited to, criminally actionable acts, acts of moral turpitude or extreme prejudice, and/or notorious public statements of support for positions that clearly oppose or contradict the policies embodied in the Republican Party’s platform as established at the national convention.
In my new book, I warn about the great political shaking that is coming to this nation, and if this rule change is even attempted at the Republican convention it would create seismic shifts in the U.S. political landscape.
Of course there is still one huge question that I have not even addressed in this article yet.
If Trump has the nomination taken away from him, who would the Republican nominee be?
Some are convinced that it would be Paul Ryan, but I believe that it would be somebody else.
Mitt Romney has certainly not hidden his disdain for Donald Trump, and right now he is quietly waiting in the wings.  If the anti-Trump forces get their way, I believe that he would be the man that ultimately walks away with the prize.


SEE: below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

Retail giant Target has been in the news a lot lately following their transgender bathroom policy and the many crimes occurring in its stores. However, now, it appears the retail outlet is face a wave of men who are snooping on young teen girls and videoing them as they are changing due to the policies of the store allowing men in women's changing rooms.
WDAY reports on one instance in Fargo, North Dakota:
A 16-year-old girl said she was peeped on with a cellphone camera while in a dressing room at the Bismarck Target on Tuesday evening.
The girl told a manager that a man placed a phone under her dressing room door with the camera face up, Bismarck Police said. When she walked out, the man entered a different dressing room.
 The store manager would not comment on the incident as police sought to find the man who was captured by video surveillance.
Another incident occurred in Revere, Massachusetts. NECN reports:
A peeping tom was seen looking at a minor female undressing over the dividing wall in a unisex dressing room of a Target store located at 36 Furlong Dr. in Revere, Massachusetts around 2 p.m. Sunday afternoon.
The suspect is identified as a white male in his late 30s, with brown hair.  He was seen wearing a white colored shirt, and he exited the parking lot in what is believed to be a four door Toyota Prius.
The victim is 17 years old.
Police are also looking for a man who was also seen in video surveillance.
In May, at a Target store in Frisco, Texas, Charles Sidney McKissack III, was apprehended by policeafter allegedly using his cell phone to video an underage girl in the women's dressing room.
"Investigators say the suspect put his cell phone over the wall of a female changing room and shot video of the girl," reported Fox 4.
In April, 33-year-old Joshua Sheldon pled guilty to voyeurism charges in Miami Township, Ohio because he looked under a women's dressing room door at a Target store.
Target's stock has been plunging since a boycott gained steam against them for their transgender bathroom policy. There are dozens of stories that have surfaced since the policy became public that demonstrate that perverts are attempting to have access to America's women and children in Target stores.
However, lest you think you are safe going to a competitor like Wal-Mart, the corporate giant's own bathroom policies are being questioned in light of its transgender policies.


Alex Wong/Getty Images
SEE: below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

Despite what you’re seeing on every cable network, on the cover of every newspaper, and as the lead story on every website, the White House has an important message for women and it isn’t about terrorism and radical Islam. It’s about “gender inequality” in America.

Last week, professional whiners and women’s rights activists (but I repeat myself) gathered in Washington D.C. for the United State of Women Summit. Guest speakers included First Lady Michelle Obama, multi-billionaire Oprah Winfrey, Academy Award-winning actress Patricia Arquette, White House senior advisor Valerie Jarrett and other women who are totally in tune with the struggles of everyday women.
It’s clear that the White House, the media, and others on the Left are living in a bubble. Several months ago I attended a White House event with 50 or so female writers and bloggers. At the event, First Lady Michelle Obama talked about her pet program, Let’s Move. She waxed on about the progress they’ve made by changing nutritional guidelines for school lunches. When it was time to take pre-screened questions, I sat back because I knew my question – Do you believe parents or local schools should have responsibility for setting guidelines rather than the federal government? – would not get me called on by the organizers. One of the questions that did make the cut – Why do we not have a program for physical fitness modeled after Common Core?

Talk to any mother with kids in public schools and the last successful federal program they’ll name is Common Core.
Like most “empowerment” efforts by feminists, the United State of Women Summit quickly became a parade of victimhood and man-bashing. Actress Patricia Arquette continued spreading the myth of the wage gap. Since her scatter-brained speech at the Oscars, she’s been christened an expert on the matter. Deadline reported:
Patricia Arquette, who gave an impassioned speech advocating equal pay for women at the Oscars in 2015, took the summit stage today to note this first White House United State of Women Summit is being held 100 years after women got the right to vote.
Last year the Boyhood star, accepting her best supporting-actress Oscar, brought Meryl Streep and others in the hall to their feet in applause, when she said, “To every woman who gave birth to every taxpayer and citizen of this nation, we have fought for everybody else’s equal rights.  “It’s our time to have wage equality once and for all and equal rights for women in the United States of America.”
The wage gap myth has been widely discredited, though Meryl Streep’s impassioned act of pretending to care about the average woman was award-worthy. In fairness, it must be quite annoying to Patricia Arquette that her reported net worth is $24 million and her non-Oscar-winning brother David Arquette is worth $25 million.
The next day, the summit featured Oprah Winfrey interviewing Michelle Obama. Just two average gals! They discussed men’s role in gender equality. The First Lady’s advice to men was simple – “Be better.” She told the audience:
Men can be better husbands, which is — be a part of your family’s life. Do the dishes. Don’t babysit your children. You don’t babysit your own children. Be engaged. Don’t just think going to work and coming home makes you a man. Being a father, being engaged, all that stuff is important. Be a better employer. When you are sitting at a seat of power at a table of any kind and you look around you just see you, it’s just you and a bunch of men around a table, on a golf course, making deals, and you allow that to happen, and you’re OK with that — be better.
What a touching message the week before Father’s Day. Kudos to the First Lady for making me sympathetic toward President Obama.


SEE: below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
Sitora Yusufiy – Omar Mateen’s ex-wife
by Danny F. Quest | Jun 17, 2016
In an interview with Brazilian TV, the ex-wife of Omar Mateen claimed the U.S. agency told her to keep quiet about his homosexuality.
The U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation told the former wife of the Orlando shooter Omar Mateen, Sitora Yusufiy, not to speak of his homosexuality or the fact that she, his family and others believed he was gay, Yusufiy’s current fiance, Marco Dias, told a Brazilian TV channel in an interview.
Dias told the Brazilian television station SBT Brazil Tuesday that Yusufiy believed Mateen was gay and that his father called him gay several times in front of her. However, “the FBI asked her not to tell this to the American media.”
Since the attack, Mateen has been dubbed an “Islamic terrorist” by politicians, senior officials and commentators in the U.S. following reports he had pledged allegiance to the Islamic State group.
However, the idea that he could have been a closet-homosexual indicates that the Orlando shooting might have been a deeply felt and personal act of hate.
The FBI and law enforcement in the United States have so far been pursuing the “Islamist terrorism” angle and their alleged demand from Mateen’s ex-wife to keep mum about his homosexuality suggests they want to downplay the personal and self-hating nature of the attack in favor of the Islamic terrorism-related one.
Since his attack on the Pulse gay nightclub in Orlando, the developing narrative surrounding Mateen’s life is that of a troubled human being who had a history of domestic violence, a struggle with his sexual orientation, as well as an inclination toward a radical version of Islam.
However, in addition to recently pledging allegiance to the Islamic State group, Mateen had previously shown support for both al-Qaida and Hezbollah, who have radically different interpretations of Islam and are in fact bitter enemies.
This suggests Mateen had an extremely shallow and confused understanding of Islam as he failed to comprehend the social and political differences between the diferent groups. Hezbollah are currently fighting against the Islamic State and other radical Sunni groups in Syria.
Furthermore, Yusufiy has told the media that her ex-husband started to emotionally and physically abuse her just months into their marriage. She said he exploded in anger and often beat her while also keeping her hostage, which led her family to “literally rescue” her from the abusive relationship and Mateen’s mental instability.
To add to this a former male classmate of Mateen said he had been asked out romantically by the mass shooter, who was reported to be a regular at the Pulse nightclub, having visited it more than a dozen times over the years.
Reports also suggest the attacker used several gay dating apps and communicated with several users. Kevin West, a regular at Pulse, told the Los Angeles Times he had exchanged messages with Mateen on an app.
And now, it seems the overwhelming reports and testimonies pointing to Mateen’s personal motives are forcing the FBI to pursue a different angle.
On Wednesday gay dating apps Jack’d and Grindr said they had been contacted by the FBI as part of the Orlando shooting investigation. They also said they could not provide information on whether Mateen had profiles on those sites as such details are now part of a classified investigation.
A spokesman for dating app Grindr also indicated they have been contacted by authorities. In response to an inquiry from Buzz Feed News, the company announced: “We will continue to cooperate with the authorities and do not comment on ongoing investigations.”
From Freedom’s Phoenix June 18, 2016