Tuesday, July 7, 2015



Sodomite "marriage" ruling means dark days ahead for USA
SEE: below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

By Gina Miller

Since the last round of twisted, egregious Supreme Court dictates, it has been easy to sit by in numb grief for our nation, because many of us have been warning, like a broken record, that these lawless things were on the way. Even so, strongly expecting the Court to do the wrong thing and finally seeing it happen are two different things. The reality of it is a body blow. We have seen plenty of bad Supreme Court decisions, and it's hard to top Roe v. Wade for badness, but the outrageous ruling on sodomy-based "marriage" is pretty much the final nail in the coffin of the formerly-free Republic of the United States of America, because it will result in the destruction of our God-given, First Amendment-protected freedoms, if there is not massive push-back by the American people. Do you see that push-back happening? Me, neither.

There have been many excellent commentaries roundly refuting the legitimacy of the Court's hellish decision to destroy the meaning of marriage, something the justices of the Court do not have the power nor the authority to do. In their profound arrogance and utter disregard for the Constitution, they made the ruling anyway, and although they handed down this evil edict, they did not change what marriage is, because they can't. Marriage is one thing only, the union of a man and a woman. It will never be anything else, no matter how many rulings and laws born in the pit of Hell say otherwise.

The persecution of Christians in the United States will now begin in earnest, as we have not seen thus far in our nation. While many associate murder with persecution, we're not quite there – yet (but, give it time). Persecution does not necessarily involve outright killing. In addition to slander, defamation, intimidation and other personal attacks, it can mean "legal" assaults on people that cause them to lose their jobs, their money, their private property, their businesses and their freedom. These things have already been happening in cases across the nation, from bakers and photographers to bed and breakfast owners to company CEOs.

With the Supreme Court imposing the abomination of sodomite "marriage" on the United States, we will now see Christian groups and organizations, schools and churches come under lawfare waged by homosexualist foot soldiers, who are the tools of the Marxist cultural revolution that ramped up in the 1960s and has been thrown into warp speed under Barack Obama (or whatever his name is). The goal of this demonic campaign, of which the militant homosexual movement is a central part, has always been the destruction of Christian freedom and expression and the moral and societal foundations of our once-great nation.

The endgame is tyranny over the people, because that is the devil's desire, and the people of this movement do his dark will. Whether it's the homofascist movement, the illegal alien invasion, the war on our energy sector, the heavy-handed federal commandeering of natural resources, even the bolstering of our Muslim enemies abroad and more, we face tyrannical evil on a number of fronts emanating from the communists in the malicious Obama regime and their fellow travelers who now run our nation and its major institutions.

It took them about a hundred years, but the communists, led by the forces of Hell, have finally just about sealed the deal in taking down the United States of America. Don't bother telling me it isn't so, or that I'm a "quitter" for observing the obvious, or that after we elect some more "Republicans" (again) all will be well. It will not be well, because what's wrong with America is something no election can fix. What's wrong with America is a deep corruption of the soul, and the devilish success of the radical homosexual/"transgender" movement is a testament to that deep corruption.

This movement is evil. The Supreme Court ruling destroying marriage is evil. The highest court in the United States has, by the largest, lawless edict yet, given "legitimacy" to abominable sexual behavior and imposed a grotesquery of "marriage" on the nation. Dark days of tyranny are ahead. Our freedoms are hanging by a thread, because God is not mocked. No nation can spit in His holy face, as this nation is doing, and imagine it will come away unscathed. No king in his White House castle can, in haughty pride, illuminate the castle with the hijacked colors of God's rainbow and not pay a dear price for his belligerent affront to the God of all creation. The rainbow belongs to God, and one day every person will admit he knew it all along. Satan has been in heaven, and that means he has seen God's rainbow around His throne (Revelation 4), and as the dirtiest stroke of insolence he can conjure against the Lord, he has inspired the reprobate minds of his homosexualist pawns to hijack that rainbow as a symbol of their degenerate wickedness. This does not end well for our nation.


Glorifying Doubt

July 7, 2015 (David Cloud, Fundamental Baptist Information Service, P.O. Box 610368, Port Huron, MI 48061, 866-295-4143, 
SEE: below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
The following is excerpted from our book What Is the Emerging Church?. The “Emerging Church” movement is a new approach to missions and church life among some “evangelicals” that is influencing many fundamental Baptist churches. The author has made a great effort to understand the emerging church, having read more than 100 books and many articles by emerging church leaders, having visited influential emerging congregations as well as attending with media credentials a large emerging conference sponsored by Zondervan and InterVarsity Press. In reality, the emerging church is simply the latest heresy within the broad tent of evangelicalism. The Bible does not warn in vain, “Be not deceived: evil communications corrupt good manners” (1 Corinthians 15:33). Chapter titles include the following: What Is the Emerging Church? A Great Blending and Merging. The Liberal Emerging Church. The “Conservative” Emerging Church. 489 pages, available in print and eBook editions from

The glorification of doubt and questioning is part of the deconstruction aspect of the emerging church. They aim to deconstruct traditional theology with the objective of reconstructing something different, something allegedly more fitting for “these times.”

Rob Bell says that God gives men “the invitation to follow Jesus with all our doubts and questions right there with us” (
Velvet Elvis, p. 28). He says, “We sponsored a Doubt Night at our church awhile back. People were encouraged to write down whatever questions or doubts they had about God and Jesus and the Bible and faith and church” (p. 29). He says, “Questions bring freedom” (p. 30), and, “Questions, no matter how shocking or blasphemous or arrogant or ignorant or raw, are rooted in humility” (p. 30). 

Tim Condor, pastor of Emmaus Way and member of the coordinating team for Emergent Village, says there must be a “climate of theological openness” to allow people to express their doubts (
An Emergent Manifesto of Hope, p. 106). He says there should never be a punitive consequence or exclusion for expressions of doubt and questioning of even the most cardinal of doctrinal truths. 

Adam Cleaveland says that churches should be “open to critique and deconstruction” (
An Emergent Manifesto of Hope, p. 125). He says there should be safe places “where people can come and be involved in the process of deconstructing ideas and practices, all while remaining open to the new movements and new waves of the Spirit.” 

Barry Taylor says, “Christian faith is open to discussion. Historically it always has been. It can be questioned and reinterpreted. In fact I would argue that it is meant to be questioned and reinterpreted” (
An Emerging Manifesto of Hope, p. 167).

Brian McLaren says that we should welcome “the disillusioned and the doubters” (
A Generous Orthodoxy, p. 172).
The emerging church’s position on doubt/questionings is refuted by the Bible’s distinction between sincere and foolish questions.
Believers should entertain honest questions from seekers, but foolish questions are to be rejected.
“But foolish and unlearned questions avoid, knowing that they do gender strifes” (2 Timothy 2:23).

“But avoid foolish questions, and genealogies, and contentions, and strivings about the law; for they are unprofitable and vain” (Titus 3:9). 

We wholeheartedly support the idea of giving unbelievers “space” for expressing their questions and doubts as they are coming to the Lord. The man who led me to Christ spent a few entire days with me patiently teaching me the Bible and answering my questions. I was chock full of Humanism, New Age, Hinduism, Christian Science, and other errors, and I had a lot of questions and challenges to what the Bible taught. I believed there were many ways to God, that reincarnation was true, that a man can find the truth by following his heart, that God would not send people to Hell if they had never heard the gospel, that Christ had learned wisdom in Egypt during the “hidden years,” and many other false things. The man who led me to Christ knew little to nothing about the things I believed at the time, but he did know the Scripture, and as I expressed my views to him, including my doubts about the Bible, he patiently listened and then replied with Scripture. 

In our church planting work in South Asia, many unbelievers visit our public meetings and home Bible studies and village meetings, and we deal with their many questions and doubts. Sometimes their questions are as ridiculous as whether or not we baptize people in cow’s blood (some of the Hindus have actually said this behind our backs) or as substantial as why we believe that Jesus Christ is the only Saviour and why He died on the cross. As we deal with their questions, sometimes they go on to saving faith in Christ and sometimes they turn away, but we deal as best as we can with their all of their issues. 

After people are saved, they still have many doctrinal questions, of course. I thank the Lord for those who patiently taught me the Scriptures and set my thinking straight when I was a young believer. For example, soon after I was saved I found a book by a Seventh-day Adventist at the public library and became confused about the sabbath and whether or not people go to Heaven or Hell at death and such things. The pastor of the church where I was a member showed me what the Bible said and his help and my own prayerful Bible study resolved those doubts. The same thing happened in regard to Pentecostal-Charismatic doctrine. Having been led to Christ by a Pentecostal, I was confused about whether tongues-speaking is for today and such things, but by studying the Bible privately and receiving help from sound teachers, those issues were resolved. I asked sincere questions and received honest Bible answers and the problem was settled. I recall my late friend and former pastor, Gary Prisk. He had lived a roving lifestyle before he was saved, hitchhiking, using drugs, and he didn’t know anything about the Bible. Not long after he came to Christ he went to Bible College, and one day soon after arriving he saw a book with the title “Is Jesus God?” He thought to himself, “No, God is God.” He wasn’t a heretic; he was simply ignorant; and after he was taught what the Bible says about Christ’s divinity he accepted it readily and defended it for the rest of his life. 

Foolish questions, on the other hand, are not to be entertained. A “foolish question” is 
a question that is asked insincerely by a heretic with the goal of confusing people and leading them astray from sound doctrine. This is the immediate context of Titus 3:9-10. A heretic is someone who is self-willed and has rejected sound doctrine in favor of his own opinions and perversions of the truth. The terms “heretic” and “heresy” refer to the willful choice of false doctrine, a willful alignment with error. The heretic is not content with the plain teaching of Scripture but pursues his own agenda. This is exactly what we find in emerging church circles. A foolish question is one that is used in an attempt to overthrow plain Bible teaching, such as questions about the Trinity or Christ’s bodily Resurrection and virgin birth or biblical inspiration or the eternal suffering of Hell or separation from the world. 

It is good to ask sincere questions in the honest search for the truth, but it is evil to entertain questions that deny Bible truth. If the Bible says all unbelievers will suffer conscious eternal torment in fire, which it does, we must not entertain questions that speculate if this is a just punishment. If the Bible claims to be the infallible Word of God, which it does, we are not to question how this could be possible. If the Bible says we are not to love this world, which it does, we are not to question whether this might be a narrow, “legalistic” position. 

Our questions must be controlled by the Bible, not the Bible by our questions. “
The secret things belong unto the LORD our God: but those things which are revealed belong unto us and to our children for ever, that we may do all the words of this law” (Deut. 29:29).

A foolish question is also 
a question that produces strife and contention among Bible-believing Christians. Titus 3:9 associates foolish questions with “contentions and strivings,” and 2 Timothy 2:23 says foolish questions “gender strifes.” When someone only wants to argue with the Word of God, he stirs up strife and doubt and confusion among others and causes trouble in the churches. 

A heretic is not a person who is merely ignorant of sound doctrine. A true believer can be ignorant of sound doctrine, but the evidence that he is not a heretic will be seen when he responds to sound doctrine and rejects the error. 

The mouths of heretics are stopped 
by refuting their questions and by putting them out of the assemblies (Titus 3:10-11). 

It is impossible to keep the truth without separating from false doctrine and maintaining church discipline. False teachers must be dealt with and not ignored, and the scriptural way to deal with them is to put them out of the assemblies and to separate the believers from them. 

The heretic is to be admonished two times (Titus 3:10). An effort is to be made to reclaim the heretic from his error. It is possible that he is not truly a heretic but that he is only teaching out of ignorance, but the effort is not to be long and drawn out. The heretic is to be admonished 
only two times (Titus 3:10). When it is obvious that he is set in his false ways, he must be rejected and put out of the assembly. Otherwise, he will corrupt others. “A little leaven leaveneth the whole lump” (Gal. 5:9). 

The heretic condemns himself by his self-willed commitment to error. “
Knowing that he that is such is subverted, and sinneth, being condemned of himself” (Titus 3:11). There is something wrong in the heretic’s heart. “Subverted” is from the Greek word “ekstrepho,” which means to be twisted or turned inside out. Something has perverted that person’s heart so that he loves heresy rather than the truth. “Such a one is subverted or perverted--a metaphor from a building so ruined as to render it difficult if not impossible to repair and raise it up again. Real heretics have seldom been recovered to the true faith: not so much defect of judgment, as perverseness of the will, being in the case, through pride, or ambition, or self-willedness, or covetousness, or such like corruption, which therefore must be taken heed of” (Matthew Henry).

Consider an example of how to deal with a foolish question from Jesus’ earthly ministry in Luke 20:1-8 and 20:20-26. Observe that Jesus did not argue with the Pharisees, nor did He waste time giving detailed replies to their insincere questions. He answered with statements that got to the root of the matter and shut their mouths! 

If a person asks a sincere question, it should be answered from the Bible, but if he is asking a question to try to spread rebellion and promote false doctrine and draw people away from the truth, it is not profitable to answer it. 

Therefore, our first point is that we must make a clear distinction between sincere and foolish questions.
The emerging church’s position on doubt/questionings is refuted by the Bible’s requirements for church membership.
There are Bible qualifications for church members, and one of those is that they continue stedfastly in sound apostolic doctrine. This is the pattern that was set in the first church.
“Then they that gladly received his word were baptized: and the same day there were added unto them about three thousand souls. And they continued stedfastly in the apostles’ doctrine and fellowship, and in breaking of bread, and in prayers” (Acts 2:41-42). 
Those who were saved and added to the church at Jerusalem on the day of Pentecost were Jews who were steeped in Judaism, but here we see that through the power of the indwelling Holy Spirit they committed themselves to the teaching of the apostles and continued therein.

I am sure they had a thousand and one questions, but the teaching of the apostles settled every issue for them. This is the way it should be in every church.

If a church member asks a question about the deity of Christ or Hell or the sabbath, he should be taught in a patient and compassionate manner. If, though, he refuses to accept the Bible’s teaching and persists in his doubt and unbelief and chooses heresy over the truth, he must be put out of the church.

Thus, there are doubts that an unbeliever can express to us in our evangelistic work that a church member is not allowed to hold. 
The emerging church’s position on doubt/questionings is refuted by the Bible’s exaltation of faith.
The Bible exalts faith over doubt. “
But without faith it is impossible to please him: for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him” (Heb. 11:6). Jesus rebuked those who doubted (Mat. 6:30; 8:26; 14:31; 16:8) and praised those who had faith (Mat. 8:10; 15:28). He taught that faith is one of the weightier matters of the law (Mat. 23:23) and instructed the people to have faith in God (Mk. 11:22). Zacharias was judged for doubting (Luke 1:20). James says those who doubt can receive nothing from the Lord (James 1:6-8). Christian men are exhorted to praise God without doubting (1 Tim. 2:8). To doubt is sin (Rom. 14:23).

The Bible teaches that we must come to terms with doubt; it must be dealt with; it must be resolved. The Psalmist momentarily doubted in Psalm 73, but his doubt was resolved in the same Psalm and he saw himself as a foolish beast for doubting God. John the Baptist doubted when he was in prison, but Jesus settled his doubt by doing Messianic miracles and thus reminding John that He is the One who was promised and also warning that it is those who are 
not offended in him that are blessed (Luke 7:19-22). On the cross, Jesus cried, “My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?” (Mat. 27:46), but this was not unresolved doubt; the question He asked is clearly resolved in Scripture. God the Father forsook the Son on the cross because He was bearing the sins of the world (Isaiah 53:5-6; 2 Corinthians 5:21; Galatians 1:4). Jesus’ question was answered.
The emerging church’s position on doubt/questionings is refuted by the Bible’s teaching on the source of faith.
Faith does not come through contemplative practices or ecumenical dialogue; it comes by God’s Word. “So then faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the word of God” (Rom. 10:17). 

True faith, being founded upon God’s inspired revelation has substance and evidence (Hebrews 11:1). The believer’s faith is founded upon “
many infallible proofs” (Acts 1:3). There is nothing blind about it.





QUOTES: She is a member of the Italian Democratic Party and the Party of European SocialistsMogherini attended the Sapienza University of Rome where she studied Political Science graduating with a Diploma in Political Philosophy with a thesis entitled "Relationship between religion and politics in Islam". A member of the Italian Communist Youth Federation from 1988, in 1996 Mogherini joined the Youth Left after the dissolution of the Italian Communist Party before its transformation into a social democratic party. In 2001 she became a member of the National Council of the Democrats of the Left (DS), later serving on its National Executive Board and Political Committee. In 2003 she started working at the DS's Foreign Affairs Section, where she was given responsibility for relations with international movements and parties, later becoming the team's coordinator; after that she was given responsibility for Foreign Affairs and International Relations on the staff of DS Party chairman Piero Fassino. In this role, she oversaw relations with Afghanistan and Iraq, as well as the Middle East peace process. Mogherini was in charge of maintaining relations with the Party of European Socialists, the Socialist International and other Left-wing parties, including with the US Democratic Party. Criticism of Mogherini ranges from claims of her being pro-Russian and too close to the Kremlin, to not taking the threat of Russia seriously. 2014 Russian military intervention in Ukraine. The President of Lithuania Dalia Grybauskaitė has publicly called her pro-Kremlin. Her first nomination as EU foreign policy chief was blocked by Eastern European EU member states. Mogherini was criticized for possible conflict of interest as her spokeswoman is married to a communication advisor of the Russian government-owned company Gazprom.

Communist and Islamophile Federica Mogherini 

Returns To Ramallah and Gaza

New EU Foreign Minister Federico Mogherini in a fond embrace with her friend in Paris back in August during Gaza ceasefire talks.



"Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose"





Sharia law for the west?
SEE: below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

As the threat from ISIS extremists grows, the European Union’s head of foreign affairs and security policy Federica Mogherini has caused consternation by asserting that “political Islam” is a firm part of Europe’s future.
Responding to last month’s brutal Islamist terror attacks in Tunisia, Kuwait and France, Mogherini dismissed the idea of a clash of civilizations and shot back at critics of mass immigration.
“Islam belongs in Europe. It holds a place in Europe’s history, in our culture, in our food and – what matters most – in Europe’s present and future,” wrote Mogherini, before adding, “I am not afraid to say that political Islam should be part of the picture. Religion plays a role in politics – not always for good, not always for bad. Religion can be part of the process. What makes the difference is whether the process is democratic or not.”
In promoting “political Islam” as part of the future of Europe, Mogherini is violating the very notion that western democracy is supposed to be based on the fundamental principle of separation of church and state (or mosque and state in this case).
Since the zenith of “political Islam” is Sharia law, the legal system derived from the teachings of Islam, she is also promoting the imposition of a system that represents one of the most repressive forces on the planet, subjugating women and allowing for extra-judicial murder such as stoning and beheading, both of which are practiced in Saudi Arabia, a country which exemplifies “political Islam”.
“She was not referring to the Muslims who divide Europe into “us” and “them” by saying, “We will conquer your Rome,” writes Robert Spencer. “She was referring to those who say that such people should be resisted. For even though she says, “Da’esh is Islam’s worst enemy in today’s world,” she has no plan to distinguish its many, many thousands of adherents among Muslims in Europe from those who reject it. And so she and her ilk are heading Europe toward a future of chaos and bloodshed.”
Mogherini’s comments will do little to dispel concerns that world leaders are hesitant to fully acknowledge the threat posed by ISIS, and the fact the group’s campaign of terror is very much Islamic, for fear of appearing politically incorrect.
Indeed, the current debate about how to stop ISIS is not centered around combating the ideology (lifted straight from the Koran) that motivates ISIS’ thousands of fighters and its millions of supporters, but an obsession with not calling the group “Islamic”.
Last month, British Prime Minister David Cameron insisted that ISIS instead be referred to as “Da’esh” because “Islamic State” was offensive to Muslims.

Call to Europe V : Islam in EU -
Speech by Federica MOGHERINI

Nazi Roots Of The EU Revealed
Published on Jul 8, 2015
Lord Christopher Monckton talks to Alex Jones about the nazi roots of the EU and how the UN is getting ready to introduce world govt in France this December.

Prediction On Global Meltdown: As Early As Fall
Published on Jul 7, 2015
As the risk of a global economic downturn rises, the European Union’s head of foreign affairs and security policy asserted that “political Islam” is a firm part of Europe’s future.




American woman who died of measles was previously vaccinated against measles… total failure of vaccine covered up by quack vaccine propagandists

SEE: below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

(NaturalNews) Ever since a woman from Washington state sadly passed away last week from what was reported as “measles,” the vaccine zealots have been in a frenzy, declaring that everyone needs to be vaccinated against the measles or more people might die.
But now the Daily Mail in the UK has revealed this woman was already vaccinated against the measles!
“A woman who became the first person to die of the measles in the U.S. in 12 years had been vaccinated against the disease,” reports the Daily Mail.
Not only was she already vaccinated against the measles, it was other Big Pharma medications that ultimately killed her! As the Daily Mail reports, “Dr. Jeanette Stehr-Green, the Clallam County health officer, told KOMO-TV the woman had been vaccinated as a child, but because she had other health problems and was taking medications that interfered with her response to an infection ‘she was not protected.’”

Woman’s tragic death demonstrates the total failure of vaccines to offer the protection they claim

In other words, the woman’s immune system was compromised by pharmaceuticals, and the so-called “immunization” of a measles vaccine failed to work. But the vaccine-pushing U.S. media twisted the story around, withholding from the public the fact that this woman was already vaccinated and that her immune system was compromised by FDA-approved medications.
Even though this death clearly demonstrates the total failure of measles vaccines and immune-destroying medications, the vaccine-worshipping medical establishment can’t resist using this woman’s death as yet another reason to call for mass vaccination of the entire population. Every death is an “opportunity” for the vaccine industry to push yet more vaccines that will also fail in other people, contributing to yet more preventable deaths from infectious disease.
Yet the propaganda rolls on…
“This tragic situation illustrates the importance of immunizing as many people as possible to provide a high level of community protection against measles,” Washington State Department of Health spokesman Donn Moyer told the Daily Mail. “People with compromised immune systems cannot be vaccinated against measles. Even when vaccinated, they may not have a good immune response when exposed to disease; they may be especially vulnerable to disease outbreaks.”
In other words, Donn Moyer just admitted that vaccines don’t work on immunocompromised individuals.
And how do they get immunocompromised in the first place? By taking FDA-approved medications manufactured by the vaccine-producing drug companies.
Somehow this is all blamed on people who take no medications and no vaccines while living with healthy immune systems that naturally defend against infectious disease. Yep, every time a person vaccinated against measles dies of the measles, it’s the fault of people who protect their immune systems by intentionally avoiding dangerous drugs and injections of toxic vaccine ingredients.

Guess where she contracted the measles? At a hospital!

By the way, care to guess where this unfortunate woman actually contracted the measles? At a hospital, of course!
“The woman was hospitalized for several health conditions in the spring at a facility in Clallam County, which covers the northern part of the Olympic Peninsula. She was there at the same time as a person who later developed a rash and was contagious for measles, Moyer said. That’s when the woman most likely was exposed,” reports Komo News. “She was on medications that contributed to her weakened immune system,” Moyer told Komo News.
So let me get this straight: This woman is victimized by the medical establishment, infected in a hospital, immunocompromised by Big Pharma’s toxic medications, given a false sense of protection from a failed measles vaccine, but somehow her death isexploited by the vaccine industry to push for even more vaccines?

Vaccine quackery on parade

Now I’m absolutely sure the vaccine industry is even loonier than I suspected. Vaccine “quack logic” is on full parade, folks, when even the deaths of people who were already vaccinated against the disease are somehow blamed on everybody else.
Is it possible the woman would still be alive and well today if she wasn’t vaccinated, over-medicated and then infected at the hospital in the first place?
Sadly, this woman is yet another person who was KILLED by Western medicine!She’s not alone, either. There are 783,000 deaths each year in the U.S. alone that are caused by doctors, hospitals, and FDA-approved pharmaceuticals. See the Death By Medicine study and statistics.
Can you imagine the massive outcry from the medical community if a woman died from a disease after taking an herbal remedy that claimed to prevent that disease? Newspapers across the country would parlay that into a national frenzy and call for the FDA to ban all herbs, claiming they don’t work! But when a vaccine doesn’t work, somehow that’s proof that even more people need to get vaccinated. That’s some serious quack medicine logic for ya. Quackadoodledooooo!
(All fun aside, technically the faith-based belief in vaccines in the face of overwhelming contradictory evidence is defined as a religion or cult. The “cult of scientism.”)
By the way, if we’re now being told that “vaccine don’t work when you combine them with other medications,” then holy smokes, that’s a whole new realization somebody needs to tell California Gov. Jerry Brown, because he just stripped away the medical freedom of all parents under the false assumption that vaccines work all the time for everyone… and he never mentioned vaccines don’t work when people are on other medications.
Maybe it’s time the vaccine propagandists started being held responsible for all the people they’ve killed, brain damaged and made autistic with their inhumane, quack-science vaccine idiocy. The real solution to preventing infectious disease is to promote healthy children with strong immune systems, not to keep destroying their immune systems with medications and toxic vaccine adjuvants that can cause brain damage, autism, seizures and even death.
Learn more truth about vaccines the U.S. media deliberately refuses to report:
Sources for this story include:…
HB 91

Allows the Division of Public Health to review and approve medical exemptions

Title:Allows the Division of Public Health to review and approve medical exemptions
Identifier:HB 91
Action Required:Contact your State Senator and ask them to VOTE NO on HB 91
Status:Passed the full senate on July 1, 2015


UPDATE: 7/2/2015 - HB 91 passed the full senate and will now go to the governor. 
UPDATE: 6/30/2015 - HB 91 passed the full house on June 16 and the Senate Health and Social Services Committee on June 24, 2015.  
UPDATE: HB 91 passed out of the Education Committee on May 13, 2015. 

HB 91 was introduced on 4/16/2015 and referred to the House Education Committee.  This bill is sponsored by Representative Sean Matthews.  
This bill would make medical exemptions subject to review and approval by the Division of Public Health.  By adding the following to existing law (underlined below): (5) Provision for exemption from any or all of the immunization program prescribed for a particular enrollee upon a written statement from a physician, i.e., medical doctor or doctor of osteopathy, stating that the enrollee should not receive the prescribed immunization or immunizations required in the basic series because of the reasonable certainty of a reaction detrimental to that person. The asserted cause of medical exemption may be subject to review and approval by the Division of Public Health.
The bill changes the definition of when a child can be excluded from school from when there is throughout the State or in a particular definable region of the State an epidemic   to an outbreak of a vaccine preventable disease or if in the estimation of the Division of Public Health any child has had or is at risk of having an exposure to a vaccine preventable disease
The bill also adds language to the religious belief affidavit that a parent must sign.  
According to the summary for HB 91 - Currently, the Affidavit of Religious Belief does not expressly alert parents or guardians who file for the religious exemption from the program that the child will be temporarily excluded from school in the event of an epidemic of a vaccine preventable disease.  This bill amends the required affidavit so parents or guardians are directly made aware of the possibility of the child’s temporary exclusion from school.  The bill also adds that the asserted cause of a medical exemption may be subject to review and approval by the Division of Public Health.  Additionally, the bill would require the Division of Public Health to declare an outbreak, rather than the current language of an epidemic throughout the State or a particular definable region thereof.$file/legis.html/?openelement
 - text of HB 91
SEE:"House Bill 384, sponsored by Rep. Quinn Johnson, updates the Universal Newborn and Infant Hearing Screening Act to require tracking and intervention protocol to address this critical issue. Currently, all hospitals are performing hearing screenings on all infants just after birth. Under the new law, hospitals and audiologists are required to report follow-up hearing evaluations of infants to the Division of Public Health within 10 days of the evaluation." 

Welcome To Fascist California; Takes Away Informed Consent for Minor Outbreaks:
Published on Jul 2, 2015
David Knight breaks down how your right to informed consent is being stripped from you and how important it is that you fight for it.

Forced Vaccination Becomes Law in California

California Law Passes Turning Children into Bioweapons

Jim Carrey Slams California Governor Over Forced Vaccinations Law
Published on Jul 2, 2015
Actor Jim Carrey recently came out against California's fascist SB 277 bill which mandates vaccines which begs the question, what else is he right about?

California Democrats Now Target Adults
For Forced Vaccinations
Published on Jul 3, 2015
The result is that the battle over state-mandated vaccines is erupting into an all-out political war. A recall effort has begun against state Sen. Richard Pan, a Democrat and pediatrician who sponsored S.B. 277, along with a referendum campaign to repeal the bill.

The Coming Medical Dictatorship
Published on Jul 7, 2015
“Stakeholders” — Health & Human Services (HHS), CDC, Big Pharma, Big Insurance, AMA & others — are making plans on how they will manage their inventory, their livestock — YOU. Removing informed consent from parents for childhood vaccinations is just the beginning. HHS is now pushing “The Adult Immunization Plan”.


“All healthcare professionals must ensure that adult patients are fully immunized.”
SEE: below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

It’s happening under the leadership of the US Dept. of Health and Human Services (HHS):“The Adult Immunization Plan.”
The goal of the Plan? To vastly increase the number of adults in the US who are vaccinated against diseases in accordance with the CDC schedule of vaccines.
Here are key quotes from the Plan:
“The HHS Action Plan to Reduce Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities includes a measure to increase the percentage of the minority population who receive the seasonal influenza vaccination.”
Translation: The government cares about minorities, and to prove it these persons will be injected with a variety of germs and toxic chemicals.
“Increase the use of electronic health records (EHRs) and immunization information systems (IIS) to collect and track adult immunization data.”
Translation: expose confidential patient medical records to many doctors and government agencies, in order to discover all adults who aren’t up to speed on their vaccinations—and therefore must get the shots. Goodbye, privacy. Goodbye, unencumbered free choice.
“Educate and encourage other groups (e.g., community-
and faith-based groups) to promote the importance of adult immunization…A variety of networks can be leveraged, including faith-based and community organizations and individual trusted leaders.”
Translation: Step up government-initiated propaganda at all levels of society, in order to convince adults to come forward and receive their injections.
“All healthcare professionals must ensure that adult patients are fully immunized.”
Translation: During every office visit, doctors must check the vaccination status of their adult patients and pressure them to take their injections.
“The Affordable Care Act [Obamacare]…will help make prevention [vaccination] affordable and accessible for all Americans by requiring health plans to cover preventive [vaccination] services…”
Translation: Increased taxes and the rabid printing of new money will ensure that many more Americans are injected with a variety of germs and toxic chemicals.
The Adult Immunization Plan doesn’t specify compulsory mandated vaccination, but it certainly moves in that direction. Tracking, surveillance, propaganda, doctor-applied pressure are its features.
Note the connection of the Adult Vaccination Plan to Obamacare. As I warned several years ago, one of the main features of Obamacare is the step-by-step evolution toward medical slavery.
As with any health insurance plan, there comes a complete list of diseases and disorders that are covered, as well as the permitted treatments for each condition.
Eventually, this list IS what medical diagnosis and treatment consist of—and nothing else.
No choice for patients, no choice for doctors.
Government makes all the decisions.
Universal coverage for both childhood and adult vaccinations is now on the Obamacare list.
Pressure to comply now, forced obedience later.
In military terms, this is a pincer movement. State legislatures are now considering new bills to limit or entirely cut off vaccine-exemptions.
Media are falling in line. “Experts” are virulently supporting mandated vaccines for all, under the banner of “protect the children.”
Public schools are overtly lying, telling parents their children must be fully vaccinated in order to enroll, when in fact the parents can opt out with exemptions that the states still allow.
Dumbed-down members of the public are responding to all this with: “What? Vaccines aren’t absolutely required for everybody already? I’m shocked. I thought they were.”
The freedom and the right to refuse medication is the last bastion. It must not fall.
Highly publicized lawsuits must be filed by honorable and relentless attorneys now. One basis for such suits is informed consent. By law, all patients must be informed, by their doctors, about the risks associated with any medicine, including vaccines, before such medications are taken. Vaccine manufacturers’ package inserts spell out some of the major risks and dangers.
Consider this: informed consent absolutely implies that the patient can refuse the medication. He has that freedom. Otherwise, “informed” means nothing and “consent” means nothing.
How can informed consent have any practical force if the patient must take the medicine?
That would be like saying, “I’m now going to tell you about the dangers of jumping out of this plane without a parachute. The law compels me to spell out the dangers. But when I’m through, you will jump out of the plane.”
This is a sword an attorney can hold and use.
Of course, the monolithic State will argue that protection of the population outweighs any consideration of individual freedom and informed consent. The State always and forever argues in that fashion, in all cases, in all matters.
That is why it is the State. It seeks, first and foremost, to expand its own power. It spreads like a fungus.
Children at Detention Center Given 
Adult Doses of Hepatitis A Vaccine

Will this Make California Repeal SB277?
Published on Jul 8, 2015
By some bizarre coincidence, a former volunteer for California Senator Pan was seriously injured after receiving a vaccine. Film maker Telly Blackwood chronicles the struggle of his friend, John Berchielli, as he recovers from a dibilitating vaccine-related injury.

Rehabilitation of John Berchielli
Published on Jul 7, 2015
A close friend of mine is struggling for his life after mysteriously coming down with Guillain-Barre Syndrome and a stroke after receiving a 3 in 1 Vaccine! He is a former 7 year volunteer and Nemesis of Dr. Richard Pan. In this video we take venture to Sutter Roseville to hear what John has to say about Dr. Pan and #‎SB277 Please like comment and share and lets get some attention to the 20k plus people a year that are coming down with this syndrome! 

Poisoned by a Vaccination John Berchielli


What This Former Merck Salesman Knows About Vaccines That You Don’t
Published on Jul 7, 2015
People who have adverse reactions to vaccinations are marginalized, minimized and denied just compensation for their injuries. We take a look at the personal story of a man just injured from a vaccination, who had ironically worked for the California Senator who authored SB277 that removes parental informed consent for vaccinations.

And a former drug rep for Merck who sold vaccines tells why he would never vaccinate his children.









Former Salesman For Vaccine Maker Merck & Co. Wouldn't Vaccinate His Son
Published on May 28, 2015 - “If you believe what you are told by the AMA and the CDC and your doctor, you’re not doing enough research.” In 1991 Scott Cooper and his wife researched vaccine safety and efficacy, determined vaccines are NOT safe or effective, and refused to vaccinate their son. Interestingly, their son was much healthier than his vaccinated peers throughout childhood. At the time, Scott worked as a sales rep for Merck & Co., a large vaccine manufacturer, and he had dived deep into researching vaccines and the risk associated with vaccination. His Pediatrician was befuddled that Scott would not vaccinate, especially because he worked for a large vaccine manufacturer! His son continues to be healthy, and Scott and his wife have no regrets about not vaccinating their son.

A STOP Mandatory Vaccination Production

Produced by Larry Cook
Founder and Director of
Contribute here:



Dr Brian Hooker "Richard Pan is full of it."
Published on Jun 12, 2015
Dr Brian Hooker lays out a case against the vaccine industry and it's profit over people business model.
Mr. Hooker illustrates the nonsensical reasoning behind a one size fits all vaccine policy.
Citing the Vaccine Adverse Event Recording System Hooker said, "There have been 500,000 adverse reactions reported since 1990. 3311 children have had their lives cut short due to a vaccine induced reaction. 1288 Adults and children have been permanently disabled or disfigured as a result of vaccines."
He goes on to point out that the momentum behind a nationwide push for stricter policy regarding medical freedom was spurred from an incident at Disneyland involving 159 individuals who have all since recovered. During that same period over 300 people have lost their lives due to vaccine reactions.
So what is the real health crisis? Measles and other childhood illnesses that humans have lived with and overcome for a millennia or a political system that is being manipulated by large corporations like Merck who profit regardless of whether or not people die and are maimed by their product?

Medical Gestapo Asking About Guns, Transgender and More

Obamacare Doctors Pushing Gender Confusion