Friday, June 30, 2017

 Published on Jun 29, 2017
Pope Francis stands by one of his top aides as he is indicted for child rape, providing proof to those who see the longstanding links between the Catholic Church and pedophile networks across the world.
 Cardinal Pell Is Just 1 of Over 8,000 Priests 
Accused of Pedophilia
 Published on Jun 30, 2017
In 2013, the new Pope, Pope Francis, said that about 2% of the priests were pedophiles. That would have been about 8,000. Yet 2 years ago, when David Knight interviewed adults with SNAP (a US-based network of survivors of clerical abuse) who had been childhood victims of pedophile priests, the Pope had done nothing about it even though he was in Philadelphia hypocritically promoting “World Meeting of Families”. Today, the 3rd highest ranking Catholic Cardinal George Pell was charged with sex abuse — multiple charges from multiple complainants.
 Pope’s Right-Hand Man Indicted For Raping Children
 Published on Jun 29, 2017
More proof is emerging that the current Pope is nothing but a Jesuit control tool for the globalists. His chief adviser has been indicted for pedophilia.
 CIA Insider: Pedophilia Is Only the Gateway, Vampirism Is The Destination
 Published on Jun 29, 2017
Alex Jones talks with CIA insider Robert David Steele about the insanity and depravity of the elite and what their end game is.
 Cardinal Pell Charged with Historic Child Sexual Offences in Australia
Published on Jun 29, 2017
Cardinal George pell has been charged with historical child sex offences. The charges come as a royal commission investigates allegations of child sexual abuse in Australian institutions.
 Cardinal Pell says sex abuse charges are false
  Cardinal George Pell denies sex offences
 George Pell is the highest-ranking Vatican official 
to be charged with sexual abuse.
 Victims condemn Cardinal Pell's lack of empathy
 Published on Nov 17, 2016
(3 Mar 2016) Survivors of clerical sexual abuse in Australia condemned Cardinal George Pell's lack of empathy in his testimony before the Australian Royal Commission on Child Sexual Abuse on Thursday.
Pell told the inquiry via videolink from Rome that he was a priest in the Australian city of Ballarat in 1974 when an unnamed student at St. Patrick's College told him that Christian Brothers teacher Edward Dowlan "is misbehaving with boys."
Asked by commission chairman Peter McClellan what he did about it, Pell replied: "I didn't do anything about it."
One victim, Peter Blenkiron appeared to be struggling with tears as he said he was having a "strong emotional response" to Pell's lack of empathy.
 THE LIES OF GEORGE PELL: Loss of Faith - 60 minutes
 Cardinal George Pell 'Exposed' Full Story
 Published on Jul 28, 2016
Les Tyack says he saw a naked George Pell expose himself to three young boys in the Torquay surf club changerooms in the late 1980s. Police are investigating multiple child abuse allegations leveled directly against Australia's most senior Catholic cleric Cardinal George Pell, the ABC's 7.30 program has revealed.

 Cardinal George Pell
Pope Francis' Finance Czar, Cardinal George Pell, 
To Move Out Of Vatican Bank
April 15, 2015
 Pope Francis’ finance minister will now be moving into the permanent offices of his new economy secretariat after receiving criticism for taking residence in the Vatican Bank four months ago. Australian Cardinal George Pell’s move comes amid major reorganization of Vatican’s financial structures -- an effort by the pope to reform the Vatican’s administration.
Earlier, critics had questioned if Pell’s occupation of the spacious office of the bank’s president was a way of showing an increased assertion over the bank. Subsequently, questions were also raised on who really led the bank -- the commission or Pell -- the Associated Press (AP) reported. The latest step clarifies that Pell will not have any direct authority over the bank, which is officially known as the Institute for Works of Religion, and is managed by cardinals who directly report to the pope.




republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
An Orthodox Jewish girls’ school in England may be forced to close because it refuses to teach its young students the government-approved line on LGBT issues.
Vishnitz Girls School, a private school with 212 pupils aged three to eight, has endured three inspections over the past year-and-a-half from the British government’s Office for Standards in Education, Children’s Services and Schools (Ofsted). According to The Independent:
While fee-paying schools such as Vishnitz do not operate under the same curriculum as mainstream state schools, they are obliged to meet two separate sets of standards for sex and relationships education laid out by the Department for Education and Ofsted.
Ofsted makes clear that schools are not expected to “promote” ideas about sexual orientation or gender reassignment, but they are expected to “encourage pupils’ respect for other people, paying particular regard to the protected characteristics set out in the 2010 Equalities Act.”
Gill Robins of Christians in Education blogged that the first “emergency inspection” occurred in February 2016, supposedly for “safeguarding concerns.” Subsequent inspections have found that all Ofsted’s concerns but one have been addressed. The latest report says that pupils are “well motivated, have positive attitudes to learning and are confident in thinking for themselves”; teachers are excellent; assessments are properly utilized; students are well-behaved; and the school environment is safe. The report even praises the school for being “clearly focused on teaching pupils to respect everybody, regardless of beliefs and lifestyle.”

There’s just one problem, as Ofsted sees it: Because of their faith, the school’s administrators refuse to teach their young charges about sexual orientation and gender reassignment. “This,” inspectors wrote, “restricts pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development and does not promote equality of opportunity in ways that take account of differing lifestyles.” In short, if the school’s orthodoxy conflicts with present-day progressive orthodoxy, the school must jettison its very raison d’ĂȘtre.
An Ofsted spokesperson told The Independent, “Parents have the right, on behalf of their children, to expect an education that conforms to their religious beliefs and is in compliance with the law.”
But what happens when their immutable religious beliefs conflict with the ever-changing law? Parents are paying roughly $6,600 a year to send their girls to Vishnitz, presumably because they desire to educate them in the Jewish faith and all it entails, including opposition to homosexual behavior and transgenderism. School officials, perhaps fearing eternal consequences more than temporal ones, told inspectors they would not change their policy on such matters.
Schools Week writes:
According to guidance on regulating independent schools, “schools that do not meet the standards must improve so they do meet them, or close.”
If a school found to be failing any of the independent school standards does not improve, the [Department for Education] has the power to take it off the register, making it a criminal offense to remain open.
Those hostile to faith certainly want to see that happen. Jay Harman, an education campaign manager at Humanists UK, told Schools Week, “If schools are not willing to meet the required standards and are found to be failing time and time again, proper sanctions must be implemented.”
“The argument used to justify such sanctions,” penned Robins, “is that [sexual orientation and transgenderism] are protected characteristics. So is religious belief, but it’s now been made crystal clear by Ofsted that the Equality Act is actually hierarchical, with sexual orientation and gender reassignment at the apex of the Act. All equalities are equal, but some equalities are more equal than others.”
Ofsted, in the words of Catholic Member of Parliament Sir Edward Leigh, “appears to be guilty of trying to enforce a kind of state-imposed orthodoxy on certain moral and religious questions.” Yet even that isn’t enough to satisfy the militant Left. According to The Independent, “LGBT campaigners warned the policy still left ‘loopholes’ for religious schools in that they are allowed some flexibility in their teaching ... ‘in keeping with their faith.’” Undoubtedly they will push for increasingly strict standards that will eventually outlaw the teaching of anything conflicting with the LGBT agenda.
Thus, it is difficult to argue with Robins’ assessment that “there is little chance of the Jewish community being allowed to continue to live in peace, with parents raising and educating their children as they think best.” Indeed, another Jewish school, Bnos Zion of Bobov, has already been investigated for making “no reference to protected characteristics for sexual orientation and gender reassignment,” reports Schools Week.
Christian schools that adhere to traditional biblical teachings cannot be far behind. “In 2014 a highly ranked Catholic school in Suffolk drew criticism from government inspectors for allegedly failing to prepare students for modern life in Britain,” notes the Catholic News Agency. “The school filed a formal complaint about the investigation. The school said parents complained that the inspectors asked children as young as ten about same-sex sexual acts and transsexualism.”
With religious belief and sexual orientation both “protected characteristics” under the law, Robins asserts that the government has “just two options — protect the right of individuals to live and raise their children in accordance with their faith, or make a mockery of the Equality Act by closing schools that fail to comply with your LGBT agenda.” Is there any doubt that, absent a major public outcry, the powers that be will choose the latter?

Thursday, June 29, 2017


State of “collapse”: Italy overwhelmed as 13,500 African migrants arrive in past two days



republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
Italy is doomed to go the way of Germany and Sweden unless it finds a solution quickly to its sudden migrant “invasion” problem, before even more arrive:
The exodus from Libya to the Italian coast has continuing unabated with no visible action on the part of the Italian government or the European Union to halt it.
The Islamic State has  expressed its plan to “conquer Rome” as central to its mission to “defeat Christianity.” An Islamic State video also warned that “Libya could be used as a springboard for attacks” in Italy. More problematic for Italy is that Libyan president Fayez al-Sarraj has been refusing to take back his own people who are sent back.
In April, Italy faced a similar crisis of migrants flooding in, and sent 6,242 migrants back home to North African countries.

“State of ‘Collapse’: Italy Overwhelmed as 13,500 African Migrants Arrive in Past Two Days”, by Thomas D. Williams, Breitbart, June 27, 2017:
Italy’s migrant welcome centers are in a state of “collapse” as huge waves of African migrants take advantage of the temperate climate to make the crossing from Libya to the Italian peninsula.
On Tuesday, 8,500 African migrants are reaching Italian shores aboard 14 different ships, adding to the 5,000 who arrived on Monday. The massive arrivals have led local media as well as politicians to speak of an authentic immigrant “invasion” exceeding the country’s capacity of assimilation.
Officials reported on June 15 that more than 65,000 migrants had arrived since the beginning of the year, but that was prior to the latest influx. Figures for the year now stand at 73,380 migrants into Italy, or a rise of 14.42 percent over the same period in 2016, when then-record arrivals had reached 64,133.
The exodus from Libya to the Italian coast has continuing unabated with no visible action on the part of the Italian government or the European Union to halt it.”…
The head of Italy’s Northern League party, Matteo Salvini, expressed his exasperation in a tweet to his followers, noting that Tuesday’s arrival of 8,500 illegal immigrants onto Italian soil was “f---ing enough.”



republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
Despite leaving office without facing justice, Obama and his top administration officials are still not out of the woods yet on the “Fast and Furious” scheme to arm Mexican drug cartels under the guise of conducting an “investigation.” This month, the House Oversight Committee and the Senate Judiciary Committee released a damning report blasting the former administration for the scandal and the subsequent ham-handed attempt to cover it up, including obstruction of Congress and shady dealings with the press and victims' families. Many key documents are still being withheld. Unsurprisingly, the establishment media has completely ignored the latest developments in the explosive story. But with more facts coming out, activists and victims' families hope former officials involved in the deadly gun-running program may still be brought to justice for a wide range of crimes.
Operation Fast and Furious was an Obama program in which the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) helped put heavy weapons into the hands of murderous drug cartels in Mexico. The whole scandal exploded when a federal agent was murdered with a Fast and Furious gun. As the story threatened to bring down key Obama officials, the spin was put out that it was all part of a supposed “investigation” into “drug cartels.” However, massive amounts of evidence emerged in the subsequent months and years suggesting that it was actually a criminal operation to blame the Second Amendment for violence, with the supposed targets of the alleged “investigation” already on the FBI payroll. Indeed, top lawmakers and gun-rights activists have said the operation was intended to be exploited by Obama to push gun-control, but it blew up in the administration's face when federal agents blew the whistle.

The latest joint staff report on the scandal, released by lawmakers on June 7, is the third in a series of congressional reports outlining the Obama administration's plan to arm murderous drug cartels by coercing U.S. gun dealers to sell them and using U.S. tax money to buy them. Dubbed “Fast and Furious: Obstruction of Congress by the Department of Justice,” the new report highlights what lawmakers said was the former administration's oftentimes illegal stonewalling and deliberate lying in the DOJ's efforts to cover up the crimes. It came from the top, too. Of course, lying to Congress can itself be a crime, and Obama's attorney general, anti-gun extremist Eric Holder, was held in criminal contempt of Congress for his lies. However, he was never put behind bars.  
The new report was scathing. “In the course of that investigation, nearly six years ago, the Justice Department wrote to Congress and falsely denied that law enforcement officers allowed straw purchasers to buy firearms illegally in the United States and traffic them without being apprehended," explained the joint staff report's executive summary. “Since that false denial, the Committees have investigated why the Department of Justice misled Congress and failed to correct its misrepresentation in a timely manner. Despite the Department’s refusal to cooperate, the investigation developed with the cooperation of DOJ whistleblowers.”
Holder himself was involved in withholding “thousands of key documents,” the report continues. And he even asked Obama to exert so-called “executive privilege” over “all documents related to the Department’s responses to questions from Congress about Fast and Furious.” Obama complied, “dishonestly” purporting to justify the administration's refusal to comply with lawful congressional subpoenas in order to “obstruct the investigation.” By the government's own logic, that strongly suggests top officials had “something to hide.”
In essence, then, the highest levels of the Obama administration were determined to prevent the American people's elected representatives from doing their jobs — even if it meant openly flaunting federal law.
Finally, the courts stepped in, forcing officials to hand over some of the documents. “The produced documents showed Holder was significantly more involved in the response to Congress’s investigation than had previously been understood,” the new report said. “Many key documents are still being withheld, but the body of evidence available at this point is sufficiently robust to conclude that there are fundamental flaws in the Department’s approach to responding to congressional requests for documents and information generally, and in the Department’s tactics in dealing with questions about the Fast and Furious case in particular.”
According to the newly available documents cited in the report, Justice Department officials were “focused more on spin and obfuscation than getting the facts right.” Calling the climate at DOJ headquarters “highly politicized,” the report noted that the Obama Justice Department was doing its best to limit the amount of disclosed information in its dealings with Congress and the press. Even the family of Border Patrol agent Brian Terry, who was murdered with a Fast and Furious gun, was given the runaround by Obama's administration, with the DOJ apparently viewing the family as a “public relations nuisance” more than anything else.
Other outrages documented in the report include the DOJ's failure to properly investigate the concerns of whistleblowers. The internal investigations, the report said, were “deeply flawed” and “largely a sham,” with DOJ officials accepting at face value the information they received from the bureaucrats involved in the gun-running. Documents obtained by Congress also revealed a lack of respect for congressional oversight, according to the report, with lawmakers saying Obama's top DOJ officials, including Holder, showed “disdain” for Congress and its role. On top of that, the documents show that the DOJ's bizarre responses and focus on spin and lies were coming down from Holder himself, the report said. Numerous voices said Holder should be in jail.
One major focus of the latest report was the murder of Border Patrol Agent Terry. “More than five years after Brian’s murder, the Terry family still wonders about key details of Operation Fast and Furious,” the joint staff report explained. “The Justice Department’s obstruction of Congress’s investigation contributed to the Terry family’s inability to find answers.” Senator Chuck Grassley, who has played a key role in the congressional investigation, testified before the House Oversight Committee and made similar charges. “The Department of Justice and ATF had no intention of looking for honest answers and being transparent,” he said. “In fact, from the onset, bureaucrats employed shameless delay tactics to obstruct the investigation.”
Another official who testified at the House hearing was ATF Special Agent John Dodson, one of the initial whistleblowers to come forward and expose the scandalous scheme. In his testimony before lawmakers, Dodson said his objection to the gun-running resulted in official reprisals, ridicule, and being put in a “state of purgatory” within the agency. “That decision, the single act of standing up and saying, what we are doing is wrong,... instantly took my standing from being that of an agent of the government — to an enemy of the state,” Dodson testified. “ATF and DOJ officials implemented an all-out campaign to silence and discredit me. Suffice to say, the last six to seven years at ATF have not been the best for me or my career.”
Indeed, it was thanks to Dodson that many of the administration's lies about Fast and Furious were exposed to lawmakers and the public in the first place. Among other lies, Dodson's revelations debunked the false “botched investigation” narrative peddled by top officials — the notion that the program was simply a well-intentioned plan gone awry to trace weapons and arrest criminals. Instead, Dodson showed that there never was an actual plan to actually catch any criminals. Even more absurd: the supposed “criminals” being investigated “had been cultivated as informants and were in fact assets of the FBI,” Dodson explained, exploding the fake narrative pushed by the administration and its propagandists in the establishment press.  
In other words, the FBI was working with its “assets” to use U.S. taxpayer dollars to help arm Mexican drug cartels with weapons bought at American gun stores under orders from the ATF. “Take the government out of this equation and nothing gets done,” Dodson noted. “No guns get purchased, because there is no FBI money to pay for them; no guns get sold, because ATF is not coercing the gun dealers to sell them; and no guns get trafficked, because ATF is not using the guise of a ‘big case’ to allow it all to happen. And yet the Justice Department was happy to let the farce continue, telling my ATF bosses they were doing a great job.” And then, the resulting violence was used to demonize gun rights and the Second Amendment.
For reasons that remain unclear, President Donald Trump's Attorney General Jeff Sessions was not willing to testify about the issue before the House Oversight Committee. In a letter sent to committee chair Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah), the DOJ cited ongoing litigation in the case, as well as “settlement discussions,” for refusing to show up or at least send somebody. “Under these circumstances, we are not in a position to provide additional information in response to your questions, nor to have a Department witness testify about them at a congressional hearing," the DOJ said in its letter. Once the litigation is over, that may change.
While Obama and his top minions have so far escaped serious accountability for their deadly scheming, which has contributed to hundreds of deaths on both sides of the border, the American people continue to demand answers. Hopefully Congress will take the probe seriously, too. For the sake of preventing similar crimes in the future, it is crucial that the gun running, the perjury, the criminal contempt, the apparent effort to traffic guns to murderous criminals in order to demonize gun rights, and all the other crimes be severely punished. Congressional “reports” and “investigations” are no substitute for actual justice.

Related articles:
Fast and Furious Whistleblower Destroys “Botched Investigation” Lie
Guns and Grenades for Cartels; Firing Squad for Whistleblowers
“Drug Lords” Targeted in Fast & Furious Worked for FBI
U.S. Government and Top Mexican Drug Cartel Exposed as Partners
Obama’s “Fast and Furious” Gun-running Scandal Grows
AG Holder Demands U.S. Court Allow Fast and Furious Coverup
White House Was Briefed About "Fast and Furious" Gunwalker Scandal
Documents Show Top Officials Lied About Fast & Furious
Project Gunrunner Part of Plan to Institute Gun Control
Feds Let Mexican Cartel Hit Men Kill in U.S., Senior Lawman Told Stratfor
Fast and Furious Massacres Spark Fresh Pressure on AG Holder to Resign
Issa: Gun-Control Agenda Behind Fast and Furious
Holder Admits Lies in Fast and Furious, Refuses to Resign
Lawmakers Introduce Articles of Impeachment Targeting AG Holder
Blasted as Whitewash, Fast and Furious Report Blames ATF and DOJ

Wednesday, June 28, 2017


 Trump Must Now Revoke CNN's White House Press Credentials
 James O'Keefe tape exposes network 
as anti-Trump activist organization
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
President Donald Trump must now consider revoking CNN’s White House press credentials after a new video released by Project Veritas revealed that the network pushes Trump-Russia hysteria despite knowing the whole story is “mostly bullshit”.
CNN senior producer John Bonifield was asked about the network’s breathless coverage of the Russia investigation and allegations that Trump colluded with Moscow to influence the election.
“Could be bullshit,” Bonifield responded. “I mean, it’s mostly bullshit right now.”

In other words, a senior producer at CNN was caught on tape admitting that the network deliberately pushes fake news about Donald Trump.
“I think the president is probably right to say, like, look you are witch hunting me. You have no smoking gun. You have no real proof,” Bonifield went on to say.
He then admitted that CNN pushes the fake news Trump-Russia collusion story to get viewers.
Asked, “Why is CNN constantly like Russia this, Russia that?,” Bonifield responds, “Because it’s ratings. … Our ratings are incredible right now.”
Three CNN journalists were also just forced to resign after the network apologized for pushing another fake news story about Trump advisor Anthony Scaramucci being linked to a Russian investment fund.
Any other news outlet that admitted it created fake news simply to make money and attract eyeballs would be savaged by the rest of the media, put on a blacklist and wouldn’t get anywhere near the White House.
Why should CNN, an organization that employs activists posing as impartial reporters like Jim Acosta, be treated any differently?
Trump must now seriously look at revoking CNN’s access to the White House.
Fake news is dangerous to democracy. Fake news should not be tolerated.
CNN's Trail Of Lies
 Published on Jun 27, 2017
In the aftermath of project veritas's new video showing CNN producer call the Trump Russia narrative a BS ratings stung Infowars Reporter Joe Biggs breaks down the the trail of Lies in CNN's history
CNN Producer Admits Russia Narrative About Trump is BS on CAMERA! Alternative Media Gets Vindicated 
 Published on Jun 27, 2017
CNN producer John Bonifield has been caught on camera admitting that CNN’s coverage of the Russia angle as it relates to Donald Trump is mostly BS contrived for ratings. The audio and video were captured by undercover journalists working with Project Veritas, an organization headed up by James O’Keefe. Their goal is to expose the evil that happens in media and politics. Previously they’d done an expose on Planned Parenthood and it showed them discussing prices for certain body parts of dead babies that had been aborted in their facilities. Now they are delving deeper into the cabal known as the mainstream media. The video that has been released today (June 27 2017) is the first of more that will come in the future on this specific topic according to James O’Keefe.

A great takeaway from the video in question is that CNN is a business just like any other. Profit uber alles. Bonifield explained to the undercover journalist that CNN is only getting around one million views a night where network news like NBC is getting 20 million. So they must figure out ways to be competitive and keep the business afloat. Prime example of this mentality was during a meeting he described which featured some insight from CNN’s CEO - Jeff Zucker. Donald Trump, at the time, had just recently pulled out of the Paris Climate Accord. CNN covered it for a day and a half. They were congratulated for that during the meeting, but Zucker essentially said “let’s get back to what pay our bills.” which is the Russia narrative.

Negative Russia coverage is not isolated to CNN. It appears to be all of mainstream media with the exception of Fox News (sometimes.) Late night talk show hosts like Stephen Colbert and Trevor Noah also do an extensive amount of negative coverage on Russia. They all have one thing in common: ratings. Even the old dinosaur print media such as The Washington Post and The New York Post participate in Russia/Trump hysteria to strain money from their dwindling bases. Alternative media has been a beacon of light throughout all of this madness, which is why mainstream media has been attacking alternative media personalities and their biggest platform: YouTube.

Invoking the Red Scare in 2017 is less about national security as it is about money. Some foot soldiers on the ground working on the ground at these mainstream media cabals may think differently. However, they are simply useful idiots. Once they are no longer needed, they will simply be discarded like the three journalists who got fired recently over a fraudulent CNN story about Donald Trump and Russia.
The Truth About CNN



EXCERPT:  "After losing all of her jobs after coming out, Williams is pushing megachurches toward LGBTQ acceptance"
Paula also serves on the board of the Gay Christian Network and is a blogger for The Huffington Post.
 Paula Williams poses for a portrait ...
"Paula is actively involved in OPEN, a ministry of progressive Evangelicals, and the Center for Progressive Renewal, a ministry of Convergence.  She is also an active member at Highlands Church in Denver, Colorado, where she leads their church planting team and preaches occasionally."
Mr. Williams’s father, who is also a minister, before his transition, when he was known as Paul Williams.
Paul, Now Paula Williams Since 2013
 Paula Williams, 66, is 6-foot-3, with light brown ringlets, a soft voice and an affinity for phrases like, “Oh, my goodness.” She is still married to Jonathan’s mother, and they share a Christian counseling practice, but they no longer live together. “Our therapist basically said, ‘You’re a lesbian and she’s not,’” Ms. Williams said.
 Paula Williams delivering a sermon recently at Highlands Church in Denver. Credit Ryan David Brown for The New York Times
Son: Jonathan Williams of Forefront Church, 
Brooklyn, New York

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
NEW YORK — The former longtime president of a church planting organization headquartered in New York has decided to live as a woman.
Paul Williams led the Orchard Group from 1989 to 2009, an organization that has planted churches throughout the Northeast, and especially the New York City area, since the 1940’s.
“Orchard Group has maintained the same simple statement of beliefs since our beginning in 1948,” its website reads, noting that it affirms the authority of the Scriptures and “[t]he necessity of the new birth through the Holy Spirit for entering the Kingdom of God.”
Williams also worked as a teaching pastor for two megachurches in addition to his involvement with the Orchard Group, and was a columnist for Christian Standard Magazine.

In 2012, Williams approached his son, Jonathan Williams, to divulge that he desired to live as a woman. The news took him aback.
“We had a church Christmas party that night, so I get this information and I have to go to the church Christmas party and pretend everything’s okay,” Jonathan Williams, who pastors Forefront Brooklyn, told the New York Times earlier this month. “I drank too much and did my best to put on a happy face, but it was pretty brutal.”
Paul Williams was still involved with Orchard during this time, even though not serving as president, and his son feared how the matter might affect both of their ministries.

“I’d be upstairs crying before church—like, this is miserable. My dad was my hero, and my dad’s not my dad any longer,” the younger Williams explained. “I’d stop crying and come down and I’d preach, and be really glad and say hi to everybody, and then I’d get home and go to sleep.”
“My wife would be like, ‘You’re super depressed,’ and I’d go, ‘I know I’m super depressed. I don’t know what to do about this.’ I got counseling about three months after I found out. And I went to him for three, four years dealing with it,” he outlined.
In 2013, Williams advised the Orchard Group that he had decided to live as a woman. His resignation was consequently requested, and he agreed. The reason for his resignation, however, was not divulged to the public.
Paul Williams changed his name to Paula and began receiving hormone therapy and cosmetic surgery. He and his wife went to counseling, and the two were advised to split because “Paula” was now a lesbian and his wife was not. While not living together, the two still remain married and operate a counseling service together.
In 2015, Jonathan Williams—who had long struggled and agonized over his father’s decision—explained during a church staff meeting that Forefront Brooklyn would now move toward full participation for homosexual and transgender members. He pointed to his children’s unflinching reception of his father’s new presentation as being a motivating factor, telling himself, “This is how God [too] sees my dad.”
Williams also sought out advice from progressive congregations who were homosexual and/or transgender-affirming.
However, recent reports of Paul William’s transition have saddened a number of Christians.
“Satan won on this one, because this pastor, before deciding to come out, had already sinned in his mind. He then followed through. Now what do you have? Our God is holy and cannot tolerate sin. Once this guy started down this path, the Holy Spirit left him to his own devices,” one commenter wrote. “If he repents and ask forgiveness, he will be back in the good graces of Christ, but if not and continues down this road, his destiny is made.”
“This is very, very sad. Psychological problems need to be dealt with by counselors who understand the problems that cause gender dysphoria, not by those that encourage a person to go through with ‘transitions,'” another stated. “God doesn’t make mistakes, but rather than seek godly counsel, he decided what? That God made a mistake? That God could not heal him of the feelings he had that made him want to be a woman? I pray God will heal him and deliver him from his gender dysphoria, and bring him to true faith in the Lord and His Word.”
Williams now attends Highlands Church in Denver, Colorado, where he works as a church planter and also preaches from the pulpit on occasion.


Tuesday, June 27, 2017


 Published on Jun 19, 2017
Typical of the mainstream media to slander anyone who talks truth, here is the interview aired on Good Morning Britain 20th June 2017.
 Tommy Robinson Schools Piers Morgan About Islam On Good Morning Britain
 Published on Jun 26, 2017
Tommy Robinson took on Piers Morgan and demolished him on the issue of Islam which Piers knows nothing about.



republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 The Washington Post has reported--drop a ready tear — that there will be no 
Iftar Dinner this year in the White House:
For the first time in nearly two decades, Ramadan has come and gone without the White House recognizing it with an iftar or Eid celebration, as had taken place each year under the Clinton, Bush and Obama administrations.
And the article by Amy Wang attempts to suggest that the “tradition” of the Iftar Dinner goes all the way back to Thomas Jefferson who, as is well known, was asked by a visiting Muslim envoy of the Bey of Tunis, one Sidi Soliman Mellimelli,  to postpone the dinner to which Jefferson had invited him, along with others, until after sundown, which Jefferson, as a matter of courtesy, did.
The Post continues:
Jefferson’s decision to change the time of the meal to accommodate Mellimelli’s [the envoy from the Bey of Tunis] observance of Ramadan has been seized on by both sides in the 21st-century debate over Islam more than 200 years later. Historians have cited the meal as the first time an iftar took place in the White House — and it has been referenced in recent White House celebrations of Ramadan as an embodiment of the Founding Father’s respect for religious freedom. Meanwhile, critics on the far right have taken issue with the characterization of Jefferson’s Dec. 9, 1805, dinner as an iftar.
Notice how in the Post article it is “historians” (disinterested, authoritative, not to be doubted) who cite that 1805 meal as the first Iftar dinner in the White House,  while those who deny that the meal was an “Iftar dinner” are described as being on the “far right,” apparently for no other reason than that very denial.
What actually happened is clear for those without an insensate need to make Islam, as Barack Obama has repeatedly  claimed it was, “always part of America’s story.” And you can be as left-wing as all get out, and still recognize that Jefferson was not putting on an Iftar dinner. A little history will help:  Mellimelli came to Washington as the envoy of the Bey of Tunis. The Americans had blockaded the port of Tunis, in order to force the Bey to halt his attacks on American shipping. Mellimelli was sent to make an agreement that would end the blockade. Invited by Jefferson to a dinner at the White House set for 3:30 (dinners were earlier in those pre-Edison days of our existence), he requested that it be held after sundown, in accordance with his Muslim practice, and Jefferson, a courteous man, obliged him. There is no hint that the dinner had changed in any way; no one then called it, or thought of it, as an “Iftar dinner.” Mellimelli himself did not describe it as an “Iftar dinner.” There is no record of it being anything other than the exact same dinner, the same menu, with wine (no removal of alcohol as would be necessary were it a real Iftar dinner), the only change being that of the three-hour delay until sunset. Nothing Jefferson said or did at the time, or in his later writings,  indicates that he thought of that delayed dinner as an “Iftar dinner”; nor did he think he was in any way honoring Islam.
In fact, Jefferson had a very dim view of Islam, which came out of his experience in dealing with the Barbary Pirates, that is, the North African Muslims (in Morocco, Algiers, Tunis, and Tripoli), who attacked Christian shipping and seized ships and Christian sailors, and then demanded ransom. The sums were not trivial; the American Republic found itself spending 20% of its national budget on such payments. These continued until Jefferson became President, stopped the practice of paying such tribute, and instead made war on the Barbary Pirates. And that worked.
In 1786, years before he became president, Jefferson, along with John Adams, met with the Tripolitanian envoy Sidi Haji Abdrahaman in London.  Perhaps by then Jefferson had read the Qur’an he had purchased in 1765 out of curiosity (no one knows how much of that Qur’an Jefferson  may have read, or when, though some Muslim apologists have baselessly claimed he must have bought his Qur’an out of sympathetic interest in Islam.) If he did read it,  it would have helped him to understand the motivations of the North African Muslims. Certainly by the time he became President in 1801, he was determined not to negotiate with the Barbary Pirates, but to implacably oppose with force these Muslims whom, he knew from his encounter with Abdrahaman in London, were permanently hostile to all non-Muslims.
In London, Jefferson and Adams had queried the Tripolitanian ambassador “concerning the ground of the pretensions to make war upon nations who had done them no injury” for the Americans had done nothing to deserve being attacked, and the ambassador replied, as Jefferson reported:
“It was written in their Koran, that all nations which had not acknowledged the Prophet were sinners, whom it was the right and duty of the faithful to plunder and enslave; and that every mussulman who was slain in this warfare was sure to go to paradise.”
And later, Jefferson reported to Secretary of State John Jay and to Congress at greater length, with a nearly identical quote from the ambassador:
“The ambassador answered us that [the right] was founded on the Laws of the Prophet, that it was written in their Koran, that all nations who should not have answered their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as prisoners, and that every Mussulman who should be slain in battle was sure to go to Paradise.”
These reports do not sound as if they came from someone who thought well of Islam. The more dealings Jefferson had with the representatives of the Barbary states, and the more he learned from them directly of the tenets of the faith, the more he began to understand the aggressive nature of Islam, the centrality of Jihad, the inculcation of permanent hostility toward non-Muslims, and the heavenly reward for Jihadis slain in battle.
The Iftar dinner “tradition” begins not with Jefferson in 1805, and that three-hour delay in a meal that was otherwise unchanged, but with our latter-day interfaith outreach presidents — Clinton, Bush, Obama — each of whom, in his own way, has managed to ignore or misinterpret the texts and teachings of Islam.
That “tradition” of Iftar dinners in the White House is less than 20 years old, as compared with the other “tradition,” ten times as long, that is, the 200 years of Iftar-less presidencies. That short-lived “tradition”  has been ended, for now, by an administration that, for all of its self-inflicted wounds and woes in other areas, continues to exhibit a better sense of what Islam, foreign and domestic, is all about, than its predecessors, and has no desire to obliquely honor it.
The interfaith outreach farce that the Iftar Dinner at the White house embodies, honoring Islam — while, all over the world, every day brings fresh news of Muslim atrocities against non-Muslims, more than 30,000 such attacks since 9/11/2001 alone, not to mention attacks as well  against other Muslims deemed either of the wrong sect, or insufficient in the fervor of their faith — now comes to an end, if only for four years. That is certainly what Jefferson (and John Adams, and that most profound presidential student of Islam, John Quincy Adams), if not The Washington Post, would have wanted.
And since John Quincy Adams has been mentioned, why doesn’t The Washington Post take it upon itself to share with its readers what that most scholarly of our presidents wrote about Islam. It does not date. And it might prove most instructive.


 Trump's Travel Ban Makes A Comeback As The Supreme Court Reinstates Executive Order
 HISTORIC: Supreme Court Saves America, 
Reinstates Trump Travel Ban
 Supreme Court Reinstates Travel Ban; 
9th Circus (Circuit Court) Overturned Again
 Published on Jun 26, 2017
The Supreme Court has reinstated Donald Trump’s travel ban that has been heavily criticized by the public and of course, the mainstream media. The ban is a temporary measure that will halt travel from six countries in and around the middle east including Libya, Sudan, Somalia, Yemen, Syria, and Iran. It is being reported as a minor victory by the aforementioned MSM because there is a caveat to the ban being allowed. If a person has a sick or injured relative in the United States, then they may have a bona fide reason for being able to skip past the travel ban. Other than that, the ban is on. Before the Supreme Court’s ruling, it was struck down by a temporary injunction coming from Federal Judge Derrick Watson of Hawaii then Theodore Chuang of Maryland and was upheld by the 4th and 9th Circuit Court of Appeals.

Much of the opposition to the travel ban is politically motivated. Maybe even personal. Derrick Watson is a native Hawaiian who attended Harvard Law School with Barack Obama. He was appointed by Obama as well. 48 hours before Watson issued the injunction which halted Trump’s travel ban, Barack Obama just happened to take a trip to Hawaii. Could be a coincidence or it could be fishy as when Bill Clinton intercepted Loretta Lynch as soon as she landed in Phoenix Arizona while she was the Attorney General in charge of the Department of Justice’s investigation into Hillary alongside the FBI. And the 9th Circuit Court of appeals has a history of decisions based on liberal activism and 80% of them get overturned.

The travel ban is up for formal talks in the court in September of 2017 but for now, it is back in place thanks to the majority conservative Supreme Court. Neil Gorsuch is the first Supreme Court appointee by Donald Trump and may not be his last since Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen Breyer are now elderly. Also, conservative justice Anthony Kennedy may retire soon. This situation could mean that Trump has the opportunity to appoint in total, 4 new conservative justices which would tip the scales of balance 7-2 in favor of conservatives which would help shape the direction of the country into the foreseeable future.
 Travel Ban Now Enforceable, Not A Muslim Ban 
 Published on Jun 27, 2017
Trumps Travel Ban has been heavily criticized by the left who claims that its a muslim ban. However the entire Supreme Court Ruled in favor of Trumps Travel Ban proving that it is constitutional and doesn't discriminate against Muslims. It's interesting to note that the 6 countries on the travel ban aren't even the countries with the highest populations of Muslims which aren't included on the ban.

Monday, June 26, 2017


GENESIS 11:1-9-
1 And the whole earth was of one language, and of one speech.
2    And it came to pass, as they journeyed from the east, that they found a plain in the land of Shinar; and they dwelt there.
3    And they said one to another, Go to, let us make brick, and burn them throughly. And they had brick for stone, and slime had they for morter.
4    And they said, Go to, let us build us a city and a tower, whose top may reach unto heaven; and let us make us a name, lest we be scattered abroad upon the face of the whole earth.
5    And the LORD came down to see the city and the tower, which the children of men builded.
6    And the LORD said, Behold, the people is one, and they have all one language; and this they begin to do: and now nothing will be restrained from them, which they have imagined to do.
7    Go to, let us go down, and there confound their language, that they may not understand one another's speech.
8    So the LORD scattered them abroad from thence upon the face of all the earth: and they left off to build the city.
9    Therefore is the name of it called Babel; because the LORD did there confound the language of all the earth: and from thence did the LORD scatter them abroad upon the face of all the earth.
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 OMAHA, Neb. — A groundbreaking was recently held as part of a Nebraska 
building project that will erect a church, synagogue and mosque side by side on 
the same property.
Temple Israel, the American Muslim Institute and Countryside Christian Church claim that they are being led by God to create the multi-faith location in Omaha.
“We believe that we are being led by our God to continue the journey started by Abraham and that we are all called to be a blessing to each other and our community,” the FAQ section of the Tri-Faith Initiative website outlines.
 It says that the effort combines the three because of their shared Abrahamic faith and their belief that they all worship the same God.

“Judaism, Christianity, and Islam share a monotheistic belief system,” the page explains. “Our traditions have many names for God and use several languages for our sacred texts, but we share a belief in the God of Abraham.”
The “Tri-Faith Initiative” has been in motion since 2006, with Countryside Christian Church being the last to break ground. It held its ceremony on June 5.
“We’ve been waiting for this moment since entering into the Tri-Faith dialogue back in October 2013. It was a true leap of faith for the congregation to vote in support of relocation back then,” leader Eric Elnes told KMTV. “To see this day come is a dream coming together.

Temple Israel opened its new $21 million dollar facility in 2013, and the American Muslim Institute completed its $7 million mosque in the spring, opening this month. A tri-faith center is also expected to be completed in 2019, and will be used for interfaith activities.
“Tri-Faith Initiative is already sponsoring activities including speaking engagements, a children’s program, shared holidays between congregations, an annual picnic, and others,” its website outlines.
“Our mission is not about compromising anybody’s faith,” Imam Mohamad Jamal Daoudi told CNN. “We are here to learn about each other and to live as neighbors with each other.”
While Countryside Christian Church, part of the United Church of Christ, already has a building 15 minutes away from the location, it said it wanted to join the effort because it liked the concept. Elnes said that the majority of his congregation voted for the move, while some reports state that the matter divided the assembly.
“We are moving simply because we fell in love with the vision of Tri-Faith,” he said.
While some laud the initiative as a peacemaking move, others have expressed concern. The Global Faith Institute, led by Dr. Mark Christian, a former Muslim turned Christian, has several posts on its website about the matter.
“The fundamental schism in Islam between Sunni and Shia is irreconcilable and has resulted in centuries of strife and violence within Islam. The idea that a mosque exists, that is open to both sects equally; in close physical proximity and partnership with Jews and Christians, makes this project a very appealing target for extremists of all stripes who might wish to make a statement using violence,” he opined.
The daughter of billionaire investor Warren Buffet, Susie Buffet, is stated to be one of the financiers of the project, according to the Kansas City Star. Buffet is a member of Countryside Christian Church.
 Countryside Relocation to the Tri-Faith Campus