Translate

Friday, October 9, 2015

GARDASIL VACCINE NOW PROMOTED TO 12-YEAR OLD BOYS FOR MOUTH AND THROAT CANCERS TO DOUBLE THE MARKET

HPV_girls_boys.jpg

GARDASIL VACCINE NOW PROMOTED TO 12-YEAR OLD BOYS FOR MOUTH AND THROAT CANCERS TO DOUBLE THE MARKET

Companies expand vaccine despite danger
by DAVE MIHALOVIC | PREVENT DISEASE
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
What’s the best way to attract new patients for a vaccine heavily marketed to only girls? Why open up the market to boys of course. The HPV vaccine is possibly the biggest vaccine hoax in the last century being nothing more than a worldwide exercise in profiteering at the expense of children’s health. Another massively flawed study (basically routine for the HPV vaccine) will give Gardasil manufacturer, Merck & Co., the green light to once again create a vaccine awareness campaign on the pretext that it prevents mouth and throat cancers.
There are truthfully no safe vaccines, however the HPV vaccine is one of the 5 vaccines I strongly recommend to avoid. It is perhaps the one vaccine based on the most misrepresented data and unproven assumptions.
In 2011, the Annals of Medicine exposed the fraudulent nature of Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines such as Gardasil and Cervarix. Key messages the researchers reported include a lack of evidence for any HPV vaccines in preventing cervical cancer and lack of evaluation of health risks.
New Market Targeting 12-year old Boys
A new study indicates suggests that vaccinating 12-year-old boys against the humanpapilloma virus (HPV) will prevent oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer, a cancer that starts at the back of the throat and mouth, and involves the tonsils and base of the tongue.
“Gradually bit by bit, perhaps, people are thinking that it is a good thing to do. Because there’s no reason why we shouldn’t protect the men also,” says Dr. Lillian Siu, a medical oncologist at Toronto’s Princess Margaret Cancer Center. Siu is one of the senior authors of the study.
But a senior vaccine researcher questions the finding, saying the study design chosen wasn’t the right one for testing this kind of question. The authors admit the mathematical model they used did not take into account other variables which may have influenced the out come of the study.
In 2012, the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommended routine HPV vaccination for males aged 11 to 12 years and catch-up vaccination for males aged 13 to 21 which is another popular market vaccine manufacturers are targeting.
ACIP is a group of individuals hand-picked by members of the CDC, that recommends which vaccines are administered to American children. Working mainly in secret, ACIP members frequently have financial links to vaccine manufacturers. Dependent on federal CDC funding, administrators of state vaccination programs follow CDC directives by influencing state legislators to mandate new vaccines. Federal vaccine funds can be denied to states that do not “vigorously enforce” mandatory vaccination laws.
The false belief is that as the number of girls and women who are vaccinated against HPV rises, fewer of these viruses will circulate so many males will get indirect protection.
“When you’ve got 50 per cent uptake (in girls), it makes more sense to immunize the boys because then you increase your chances of getting herd immunity,” says Dr. Natasha Crowcroft from Public Health Ontario who was not involved in this study.
False Data and Junk Science
Gardasil’s manufacturer, Merck, states on their website that Gardasil does more than help prevent cervical cancer, it protects against other HPV diseases, too. Merck further claims that Gardasil does not prevent all types of cervical cancer. Similarly, the CDC and the FDA claim that the Gardasil vaccine is an important cervical cancer prevention tool that will potentially benefit the health of millions of women and based on all of the information we have today, CDC recommends HPV vaccination for the prevention of most types of cervical cancer. All four of these statements are false and at significant variance with the available evidence as they imply that Gardasil can indeed protect against some types of cervical cancer which has never been proven.
At present there are no significant data showing that either Gardasil or Cervarix (GlaxoSmithKline) can prevent any type of cervical cancer since the testing period employed was too short to evaluate long-term benefits of HPV vaccination. The longest follow-up data from phase II trials for Gardasil and Cervarix are 5 and 8.4 years, respectively, while invasive cervical cancer takes up to 20 -40 years to develop from the time of acquisition of HPV infection.
As adverse side effects from the new vaccine continue to mount, the opposition to the vaccine has grown. A lead researcher, Diane Harper, a scientist and physician who has spent 20 years developing the vaccine for human papillomavirus, says the HPV vaccine is not for younger girls, and that it is “silly” for states to be mandating them.
Adverse Effects
Here are just a few of the potential side effects caused by the HPV vaccine:
  • convulsions [which are serious reactions with risks of serious brain injury];
  • grand mal seizures and convulsions;
  • deafness
  • circulatory collapse;
  • blood problems, leading to unexplained bruising or bleeding
  • acquired colour blindness;
  • fainting or brief loss of consciousness
  • Guillain Barre syndrome
  • head banging;
  • lymphadenopathy
  • chronic fatigue syndrome
  • foaming at mouth;
  • transient blindness;
  • transient deafness
Mercola reports on 213 women who took Gardasil and suffered permanent disabilityMultiple-sclerosis-like symptoms and neurological complications, including seizures, paralysis and speech problems, are being reported by increasing numbers of girls and women following Gardasil vaccination.
Due to hundreds of adverse reactions to cervical cancer vaccine reported in Japan, teenagers were injured and disabled by Cervarix and Gardasil HPV vaccination campaigns are now continue to voice their disdain with efforts to permanently end the government’s subsidy program for the toxic injections. In July 2013, their health ministry issued a nationwide notice that cervical cancer vaccinations should no longer be recommended. Japanese teens who received the vaccines were confined to wheelchairs with damage to their brains and spinal cord.
A class-action lawsuit has been filed in Australia against drug maker Merck by a young woman who suffered autoimmune and neurological health problems following injections with the HPV vaccine, Gardasil
Between May 2009 and September 2010, 16 deaths occurred after Gardasil vaccination, along with 789 reports of “serious” adverse reactions; 213 cases of permanent disability; and 25 cases of Guillain Barre Syndrome. Between September 1, 2010 and September 15, 2011, yet another 26 deaths were reported.
Just two months ago, Japan’s health ministry issued a nationwide notice that cervical cancer vaccinations should no longer be recommended for girls due to several hundred adverse reactions to the vaccines reported.
What Are The Facts?
Consider some of the facts related to cervical cancer and the HPV vaccine:
  • Cervical cancer is not a major health issue for women under good gynecological care.
  • HPV vaccines may protect against four strains of high-risk HPV but the duration of effectiveness is not clear; best estimates to date are from 4 to 6 years
  • HPV vaccination does not eliminate the need for traditional cervical cancer screening
  • Prior exposure to vaccine-relevant strains of HPV can increase the risk of cancer by 44.6% if injected with Gardasil and 32.5% if injected with Cervarix
  • HPV is not transmitted solely via sexual contact, there are multiple other ways to have been exposed
  • There are already well over 300 reports to VAERS of abnormal pap smears post-vaccination
  • HPV does not cause cervical cancer, it is the persistant infection, not the virus, that determines the risk
  • 93% of women initially infected with a particular strain of HPV will not show the same strain four menstrual cycles later
  • Most cervical cancer deaths in the United States, and developed countries, are people who are not under regular OB/GYN care.
  • The National Cancer Institute has no data on which HPV genotypes are prevalent in the United States.
  • A CDC study showed that HPV types 16 and 18, the two HPV vaccine-relevant strains, are NOT the prevalent types in American women.
  • Three published papers on HPV prevalence in the U.S., indicated that types 62, 84 and 52 are the most prevalent. None of these are targeted in either approved HPV vaccine, and type 52 is an accepted high-risk “carcinogenic” strain of HPV.
  • If a person has prior exposure to vaccine-relevant HPV prior to injection, the vaccine provides no benefit, but does provide potential risks.
  • If a woman is infected with HPV-16 in January, HPV-18 in July, and HPV-31 in December, her cancer risk is zero. Even though these are all high risk types, they are considered transient. It takes repeated infection by the same type to perhaps pose a risk of cervical cancer.
  • Even when a woman has persistant infection by the same type, if her lifestyle is healthy (she does not smoke, does not take oral contraceptives, does not have multiple sexual partners, does not have a compromised immune system) her risk of cervical cancer is still minimal.
  • HPV is not necessarily a sexually transmittable virus–you can get it other ways.
  • American women currently spend $10 billion on unnecessary colposcopies (cervical biopsies) every year, primarily because the currently used HPV tests frequently display false positive results.
  • A study conducted by Harvard School of Public Health estimated that 95% of cervical biopsies in the United States are not necessary.
  • If a young woman is considering taking an HPV vaccine, it is critical that she know if she has been exposed to HPV, and if so, what genotype.
  • Nothing has been proven to be more effective at controlling cervical cancer than pap smear technology.
  • To date, the efficacy of HPV vaccines in preventing cervical cancer has not been demonstrated, while vaccine risks remain to be fully evaluated.
  • Current worldwide HPV vaccination practices with either of the two HPV vaccines appear to be neither justified by long-term health benefits nor economically viable, nor is there any evidence that HPV vaccination (even if proven effective against cervical cancer) would reduce the rate of cervical cancer beyond what Pap screening has already achieved.
  • Cumulatively, the list of serious adverse reactions related to HPV vaccination worldwide includes cervical cancer itself.
  • The almost exclusive reliance on manufacturers sponsored studies, often of questionable quality, as a base for vaccine policy-making should be discontinued.
  • the presentation of partial and non-factual information regarding cervical cancer risks and the usefulness of HPV vaccines, as cited above, is neither scientific nor ethical.
Decline Continues In HPV Vaccine Completion Rate Thanks To Informed Parents
Thanks to the wealth of information available on the HPV vaccine fraud, the proportion of insured girls and young women completing the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine among those who initiated the series has dropped significantly — as much as 63 percent — since the vaccine was approved in 2006, according to new research from the University of Texas Medical Branch (UTMB) in Galveston.
This is the primary reason and attempt to increase the market demographic to young boys.
Of those surveyed by Planned Parenthood, only about a third (30.7 percent) of parents had elected to have their children vaccinated. An additional 4.8 percent had children who had received two out of the three necessary doses, while another 6.7 percent had only one of the three necessary doses. Over 40 percent of parents polled were either undecided about whether their child should receive the vaccine or had decided not to vaccinate their child against HPV.
A study published in Cancer, revealed the steepest decline in vaccine completion among girls and young women aged nine to 18 — the age group according to medical officials that should receive the vaccine in three doses over six months — a message that has been drilled into parents for just over five years. It’s a sign that parents are listening and completing their own research on the dangers of HPV vaccination despite Doctor’s recommendations.
______________________________________________________________

MEDICAL TYRANNY:

How Vaccine Pushers Track Your Children




COMMON CORE: BILL & MELINDA GATES TRY TO PAINT IT AS POPULAR; JUST A MATTER OF TIME AND EFFORT THEY SAY; OPPOSED BY CONSTITUTIONALISTS?

THE FRUMPY WINDOWS 95 AGED COUPLE WHO THOUGHT THEY HAD IMMORTALITY?
IF THEIR MONEY WON'T ALTER REALITY, PERHAPS SOME BRAINWASHING 
ON SOCIALIST PUBLIC TV?
THE RAVAGES OF TIME BEGINNING TO SHOW
INCOHERENT OUTDATED BILL READY FOR NURSING HOME, 
FULL DENTURES & BABY FOOD? SHE TAKES OVER FOR HIM!

THE GATES UNLOAD A PILE OF TRITE LIES ABOUT COMMON CORE; BLAME REPUBLICAN MISINFORMATION
CLAIM ONLY THE RECALCITRANT, POLITICALLY INCORRECT 1% DISLIKE COMMON CORE
NO MENTION OF THOUSANDS WHO HAVE OPTED OUT OF TESTING AND/OR TEACHERS' UNIONS AND INDIVIDUAL TEACHERS WHO HAVE REFUSED TO TEACH THIS DUMBED DOWN, ONE SHOE FITS ALL, SOCIALIST, ANTI-AMERICAN, FEDERAL GOVERNMENT TAKEOVER OF LOCAL CONTROL.
MELINDA SAYS THE STATES DECIDED TO ADOPT COMMON CORE, BUT CONVENIENTLY LEAVES OUT FEDERAL BRIBERY, COERCION & CONTROL, GATES FOUNDATION INFUSION OF CASH, STUDENT TRACKING, LOSS OF PRIVACY; CLAIMS STATES WHO DROPPED COMMON CORE SIMPLY RE-BRANDED IT UNDER DIFFERENT NAMES, SO THEY STILL LIKE THE CORE PRINCIPLES.
DON'T BE DECEIVED BY THIS MALWARE; TELL THEM TO KEEP THEIR CATHOLIC, SOCIAL JUSTICE, PHILANTHROPIC "GOOD WORKS" & EUGENICS BY VACCINATION
SEE: THIS BLOG'S PREVIOUS 27 POSTS ABOUT THE GATES, USING THE "SEARCH THIS BLOG" FEATURE
VIDEO: TRY "RE-FORMATTING YOUR HARD DRIVE" 
BY LOVING COMMON CORE? 
DOWNLOADING THEIR LATEST UPDATES WILL INFECT YOUR MIND
Matthew 7:15-23-"Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves. Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles? Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit. A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit. Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire. Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them. Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven. Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works? And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.
________________________________________________________
REMEMBER THIS?:

Bill Gates Admits Vaccines Are Used for Human Depopulation
Uploaded on Feb 28, 2010
Next are two short excerpts from a recently filmed TED presentation (Feb 2010) by none other than Bill "Microsoft" Gates.

At the heart of Gates' address lies the central Global Warming dogma, which dictates that Co2 emitted by human beings are the primary culprit for the unwanted heating of the globe. Since this artificial alleged human-induced heating effect allegedly stands to devastate the planet if left unabated, Global Warming dogma proponents therefore argue that human Co2 emissions must be drastically reduced. As Gates casually addresses the issue, he goes on to state that one way to accomplish this goal is to reduce the global human population.

ERRATUM: To be completely fair and accurate, I should have stated that Gates seeks to reduce the anticipated growth of the human population rather than that he seeks to reduce the current population. I admit that the latter slogan, that is contained in the video, is a bit misleading and I do not want to insinuate that Gates seeks to kill off currently living people. He rather seeks to lower the projected population growth.

He postulates the central equation, giving an estimation of the humanly emitted C02 load per year, to be:

Co2 = P times S times E times C

Where P stands for the population number, S the average number of services per person, E the average amount of energy units per service, and C the average Co2 emitted load per unit of service, per year; Co2 stands for the projected total humanly emitted carbon-dioxide load by the entire population per year.

In the first clip you will hear him state in plain language that he considers VACCINES to be desirable to bring down the future population number P and so reduce Co2. You will also casually hear him promoting HEALTH CARE and REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH SERVICES, to accomplish that same C02 reducing goal.

Here are Bill Gates' verbatim words [square parentheses additions for clarification purposes are mine though]:
"The world today has 6.8 billion people. That's heading up to about nine billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that [number of 9 billion] by perhaps 10 or 15 percent. But there we see an increase of about 1.3 [billion]."

Let's focus on the vaccines. Gates is stating that he considers vaccines to be useful in contributing to bring the projected population growth of 2.2 billion down to 1.3 billion, roughly one billion. What kind of properties can thus reasonably be deduced that vaccines are to have according to Gates? Well, basically all the properties that impede people to either have children, or successfully rear them. In other words, Gates implicitly advocates the definition of his favorite kind of vaccine to be one that fosters infertility, sterility and (early onset) senility (autism) alike. Note that Gates does not mention a word on the much touted purported intention of vaccines: to offer protection against relevant diseases and therefore as such, precisely prolong life. Given the abundance of toxins in vaccines (see my blog for some links of simply Google "toxin ingredient vaccine"), the position that vaccines contribute to decrease mortality rates, is kind of hard to maintain.

So Gates proves to be quite the humanitarian there huh?

In the second excerpt you hear Gates explain what he considers to be the single most important thing that he would choose to see become a reality in the future time span of 50 years. He again confirms his "love" for the vaccine.

Bill Gates Evil Illuminati Depopulation Agenda using Vaccines EXPOSED

Agenda 21 & Eugenics - Bill Gates Depopulation Plans Exposed


Bill Gates, " Vaccinate to Depopulate":
His Logic Explained
Uploaded on Mar 2, 2010
TrutherGirls T-Shirts: http://thetruthergirls.spreadshirt.com/
Bill Gates recently went on record at a TED conference declaring that his foundation's vaccine programs' goals were to reduce the poulation. This has led a lot of people to jump to the conclusion that he was saying his vaccines affect fertility. However, if you look at previous interviews on teh subject, you will see that it's not tat simple and that there is a lot of twisted logic involved. Bottom line: Gates is an admitted depopulationist. Would you trust his intentions when it comes to people's health?
Prison Planet article on Gates, vaccines and depopulation with TED video embedded
"The world today has 6.8 billion people. That's heading up to about nine billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent!" [About 1 Billion People!]- Bill Gates
http://www.prisonplanet.com/bill-gate...

Transcript of 2008 CNN interview with Gates where he explains how vaccine slower birth rate by lowering child mortality rate.
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPT...

GAVI alliance- pushing vaccines for 3rd world countries. Major contributor: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
http://www.gavialliance.org/

Bill and Melinda Gates foundation: emphasis on vaccines
We invest heavily in vaccines across our portfolio in the hope that one day they can be used to prevent HIV, malaria and TB; wipe out polio; and help save children from dying of diarrhea and pneumonia.
http://www.gatesfoundation.org/global...

Infant mortality by country:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_...
Breast feeding prevents disease. Info on infant mortality
http://www.deathreference.com/Me-Nu/M...
More on infant mortality
http://www.cwru.edu/med/epidbio/mphp4...
Mali stats on water, vaccines, etc
http://www.unicef.org/infobycountry/m...
effect of fertility reduction on infant and child mortality: Evidence form Matlab, Bangladesh
http://www.jstor.org/pss/2175030
GAVI on Rotavirus Vaccine: 60% efficacy (that is not equivalent to effectiveness. No stats on whether it has actually lowered death rate or hospitalizations, of course)
http://www.gavialliance.org/media_cen...
UNFPA calls for increased abortion to decrease child mortality, increase education:
http://www.c-fam.org/publications/id....






SUPREME COURT SAYS MANDATORY VACCINATIONS DON’T VIOLATE CHILDREN’S CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS

SUPREME COURT SAYS MANDATORY VACCINATIONS DON’T VIOLATE CHILDREN’S CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS

Supreme Court justices uphold appeals court ruling violating constitutional right of religious freedom
BY JAY SYRMOPOULOS | INFOWARS.COM 
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

The U.S. Supreme Court has refused to hear a case challenging the state of New York’s public school vaccination requirement, which requires all children to be vaccinated prior to attendance at public school.
The SCOTUS’s failure to hear the case effectively states that mandatory vaccination of all public school children, doesn’t violate their constitutional rights.
A lower court had ruled that the school vaccination requirement, which three parents had legally challenged after their unvaccinated children were prohibited from attending school, did not violate the constitutional rights of the children.
The appeals court also upheld a decision that children exempted from vaccinations due to religious reasons could be prohibited from school attendance in the event of a disease outbreak that is vaccine preventable.
According to a report by the Associated Press:
In the New York case, two students who were not vaccinated on religious grounds were temporarily barred from going to school after a fellow student was diagnosed with chicken pox. The family of the third student challenged the statute after a judge denied her mother’s request for a vaccine exemption, finding that the mother’s concerns were primarily health-related and not based in religion.
The attorney representing the three New York families have made it clear that this issue is not going to simply go away, as the debate over mandatory vaccinations has reached fever pitch across the United States.
“I’m disappointed but I think there’s more coming,” attorney Patricia Finn said.
“Throughout the country… people are organizing and challenging these statutes,” Finn told the Associated Press by phone. “I don’t know why the (Supreme) Court didn’t take it. There’s far more coming.”
With California recently passing legislation requiring mandatory vaccination for public school, while doing away with any personal belief exemption, this issue is certainly far from decided.
While the Supreme Court may have simply ducked the issue for the time being, it’s almost a certainty that the legality of forcing vaccinations with no exemptions will end up being decided by the court.
It is important to note that this issue is not about being “anti-vax” or “pro-vax.” It is about the state mandating away your right to informed consent. Even if vaccinations proved to be 100 percent safe,which they are not, it would still be unethical for the state to mandate you put them into your body against your will.
Sound off in the comments and let us know how you feel about mandatory vaccinations with no exemptions. Great idea or tyrannical government overreach?
This article first appeared at TheFreeThoughtProject.com.
______________________________________________________________

FEDERAL Forced-Vax Bill : 'Vaccinate All Children Act of 2015'The bill, HR 2232, 'aka 'Vaccinate All Children Act of 2015' seeks to abolish religious and philosophical exemptions nationwide, forcing all schoolchildren to receive ALL recommended vaccines. Say NO to forced vaccines! http://healthimpactnews.com/2015/new-... https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-c...