Wednesday, November 9, 2016



Dollars Prove Trump Ran His Campaign 
Twice As Efficiently As Hillary


NOVEMBER 9, 2016
President Obama Speaks About Election of Donald Trump; Invites Trump to White House to Discuss "Amicable" Transition, After Trashing Trump Repeatedly During Campaigns


Obama worked hard to cast doubt on possibility of Trump presidency


SEE: below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Homeschooling is an increasingly popular form of education in the U.S, with an estimated 1.8 million students now being educated at home, according to a detailed report that was released last week.
The National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) is the branch of the U.S. Department of Education that is responsible for collecting and analyzing schooling data and educational trends across the country. Their most recent report, “Homeschooling in the United States: 2012,” provides a detailed glimpse into the modern homeschool movement.
“This report provides estimates of the number, percentage, and characteristics of homeschooled students in the United States in 2012 and provides historical context by showing overall estimates of homeschooling in the United States since 1999,” the report’s executive summary explains.
Data for the report came from questionnaires that were completed by the parents of 17,563 students. After collecting the questionnaires and extrapolating the data to represent the entire nation, the NCES estimated that 1,773,000 students were homeschooled in the U.S. in 2012. Compared to 1999, when 850,000 students were homeschooled, that is a significant increase.
“The percentage of students ages 5–17 with a grade equivalent of kindergarten through grade 12 who are homeschooled—the homeschooling rate—has increased over time,” the report states. “The homeschooling rate increased from 1.7 percent in 1999 to 3.4 percent in 2012.”
Homeschooling grew most rapidly between 1999 and 2007, with the growth rate tapering off between 2007 and 2012.
The report sheds light on why a growing number of parents in the U.S. are choosing to educate their children at home.
“Nine in 10 homeschooled students’ parents reported that concern about schools’ environments was an important reason for their decision to homeschool,” the NCES says. Many parents also mentioned a desire to provide moral or religious instruction, a dissatisfaction with the academic instruction at other schools, and a desire to provide a nontraditional approach to child’s education as reasons they chose to homeschool their kids.
The report shows that most homeschooled students learn a variety of science subjects at home.
“Among science subjects, about 7 in 10 high-school level homeschooled students had earth sciences or geology and biology included in their home instruction (69 percent each); about half had home instruction in scientific inquiry (47 percent), and about a third had home instruction in chemistry or physics (34 percent) and computer science (32 percent),” the NCES explains.
To teach these and other subjects, a growing number of parents are turning to online courses.
“About a third of middle school-level homeschooled students (35 percent), a third of high school-level homeschooled students (34 percent), and 11 percent of elementary-level homeschooled students took online courses,” the report notes. “A quarter of homeschooled students who took online courses took them through their local public school or another public school (13 and 12 percent, respectively).”
In addition to these characteristics, research suggests that children who are homeschooled in Christian homes are less likely to leave the faith when they grow up.As previously reported, a study last year found that Millennials who are homeschooled tend to continue in the faith more than individuals who attend private or public schools.
“Having a strong relationship with the child’s mother and father, attending church as a child, and years homeschooled were all clearly positively associated with Millennials’ basic Christian orthodoxy, broader biblical beliefs, Christian behaviors (e.g., attending church, keeping sex in marriage, prayer, not using pornography), satisfaction in life, civic and community involvement, and having beliefs similar to one’s parents,” said Dr. Brian Ray, the lead researcher behind the study.


SEE: below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

More than half of the regimes sitting on the United Nations Human Rights Council after last week's election have been categorized as un-free, sparking criticism and further ridicule of the global body ostensibly tasked with upholding the UN's vision of human rights. Among the latest selections to serve on the discredited global council are some of the most oppressive and murderous communist and Islamist dictatorships on the planet. That is despite the UN outfit's mandate saying that only member governments that “uphold the highest standards in the promotion and protection of human rights” are eligible to join. Adding to the controversy, the Obama administration and Western powers remained silent as UN member governments chose some of the most barbaric regimes on Earth to police “human rights” around the world.
Of course, the selection of ruthless totalitarians to the UN's “human rights” bureaucracy is nothing new. It got so bad more than a decade ago that the brutal regime of late Libyan dictator Moammar Gadhafi was selected to lead the UN “Human Rights Commission.” After becoming a global laughingstock and discrediting the broader UN, the “commission” was formally disbanded, being replaced by the new and supposedly improved “council.” Like its predecessor, though, the UN Human Rights Council is now officially controlled by repressive, un-elected governments. The UN's pseudo-“human rights” apparatus is also led by an extremist Muslim prince who constantly attacks the United States, free speech, gun rights, and other fundamental freedoms, while meddling in Western elections and covering up real atrocities perpetrated by child-raping UN “peace” troops or dictatorial UN member governments.
The latest list of selections for the UN body, chosen by UN member governments and tyrants, reads like a who's who of totalitarian regimes. Among the communist dictatorships that cruised to victory at the UN council, for example, was the regime enslaving mainland China, which has murdered more people than any government in human history. Conservative estimates suggest that the Communist Party state in Beijing is responsible for killing between 60 million and 100 million victims, not including those slaughtered in forced abortions. Despite ongoing atrocities that include harvesting organs from political and religious prisoners, forced abortions to enforce population control, ruthless persecution of Christians, massive censorship, a lack of elections, and more, 180 UN member states decided the autocracy in Beijing was well suited for the important human-rights post.
Another savage communist regime to secure a seat on the UN body is the Castro-led Stalinist dictatorship enslaving Cuba, which received support from 160 out of 193 UN member states. In addition to its history of mass-murder and savage persecution of dissidents, the military autocracy continues to export communist terrorism and tyranny around the world. Indeed, Obama actually launched his political career in the home of Castro-backed communist terrorist Bill Ayers, whose treasonous terror group bombed U.S. targets, murdered police officers, and, according to the FBI, plotted to intern and execute millions of counter-revolutionary Americans with help from foreign dictatorships.
Havana and Beijing both secured re-election, and will be sitting on the UN “human rights” body with a good number of their ideological allies in Asia, Latin America, and beyond. Among the communist and socialist regimes on the council are those ruling Bolivia, Vietnam, South Africa, Ecuador, El Salvador, what remains of imploding Venezuela, and many more. Ironically, around the time of the “elections” to the UN council, the brutal Nicolas Maduro regime in oil-rich Venezuela was sending its minions disguised as “Non-Governmental Organizations” (NGOs) to praise the socialist tyrant's “human rights” record. At home, Maduro is busy jailing political opponents, massacring protesters, and trying to prevent food riots as starved Venezuelans wait hours in line to get the bare essentials of life.
Also taking a spot on the Human Rights Council was the Islamist regime in Saudi Arabia, which beheads apostates, bans Christianity, flogs and executes dissidents, and supports radical Islamism around the world. Over 175 people, including children and disabled people, literally lost their heads in 2014 to the Saudi regime's executioners, who typically use swords to behead those convicted of “apostasy” from Islam and other supposed crimes. Sometimes, following a public beheading, the severed head is tied to the decapitated corpse and displayed in public, tied to a post, as a “deterrent,” ISIS style. Others on the wrong side of the regime's “justice” system can face public floggings, firing squads, the severing of hands, and other cruel and unusual punishments typically considered barbaric in civilized countries. The regime is also widely reported to use torture to extract confessions.      
The election of the Islamist Saudi Arabian regime, which has been criticized around the world, followed a successful but deeply controversial effort to have itself removed from a UN list of child killers for its ongoing killing and maiming of children in schools and hospitals in Yemen. It also drew outrage from watchdog groups, human-rights campaigners, and even pro-UN apparatchiks concerned that the UN was further discrediting itself on the world stage. “The UN's election of Saudi Arabia as a world judge on human rights is like a town picking a pyromaniac to be the fire chief,” said Hillel Neuer, executive director of the non-profit watchdog group UN Watch. More than a few other Islamist regimes already sit on the UN body.   
According to a statement by UN Watch, a full 53 percent of the governments now sitting on the UN “Human Rights Council” are what the organization referred to as “non-democracies.” And indeed, many of the worst serial human-rights abusers are among them. “The re-election of China, Cuba and Saudi Arabia — regimes which systematically violate the human rights of their citizens — casts a shadow upon the reputation of the United Nations,” continued Neuer, whose organization advocates reforming the system rather than shutting it down. Indeed, as the group has pointed out, the increasingly discredited UN body has instead focused its efforts on demonizing the State of Israel, which has been the target of more than half of all resolutions from the council aimed at a specific country. That is likely to continue.   
UN Watch also expressed “disappointment” at what it described as the “deafening silence” from the Obama administration and the European powers that “deferred to dictators by refusing to speak out and campaign against them.” Neuer added that by remaining silent and turning a blind eye as dictators and human rights violators join and subvert the UN council, those governments “are complicit in the world body's moral decline.” “When the UN helps gross abusers act as champions and global judges of human rights, it's an insult to their political prisoners and their many other victims — and a defeat for the global cause of human rights,” he concluded. “When the UN's highest human rights body becomes a case of the foxes guarding the hen house, the world's victims suffer.”
Other governments and dictatorships with troubling records selected in the latest process included those ruling Egypt, Rwanda, South Africa, Tunisia, Iraq, Brazil, and Guatemala. Many of those governments have come under fire for abuses. The increasingly extremist regime in South Africa, for example, is led by Jacob Zuma, who has been caught singing songs advocating genocide against vulnerable minorities on national television. They will be joining the oppressive regimes ruling Algeria, Burundi, Congo, Ivory Coast, Ethiopia, Kyrgyzstan, Maldives, Namibia, Morocco, Qatar, Viet Nam, and more. Vladimir Putin's controversial Russian government was defeated by a razor thin margin, with the governments of Croatia and Hungary selected from the Eastern European grouping instead.    
Even the neoconservative internationalist George W. Bush boycotted the dictator-dominated UN outfit that legitimizes gross human rights abusers and tyranny. The Obama administration, though, decided to re-join, and has now been selected as a member of the council, perhaps imagining that it can tie the hands of a potential President Trump. “U.S. engagement has helped transform the Council into a more balanced and credible organization and has helped focus the global spotlight on grave violations and abuses of human rights around the world,” claimed Obama's controversial Secretary of State John Kerry. Among the alleged “achievements” celebrated by Kerry was the UN body's unleashing of a radical homosexuality and gender-confusion czar to bully governments and dictators worldwide into submission to the so-called “LGBT” agenda.
Many critics who have ridiculed and blasted the UN Human Rights Council have argued that it can be “reformed.” But despite all of the recommendations for “reforming” the UN body, the problems with it and the broader UN are in reality systemic. To begin with, consider the UN's own “Universal Declaration of Human Rights,” which outlines what the UN misleadingly characterizes as the “rights” of human beings. While the document offers lip service to various liberties, it is based on several premises that make it fundamentally incompatible with unalienable, God-given rights as understood in the United States — individual rights that the American Declaration of Independence says government is actually instituted to protect.
Consider Article 29 of the UN declaration, for starters, which claims that “rights” can be limited “by law” under the guise of everything from “public order” to “the general welfare.” Separately, the same article claims that everyone has “duties to the community” and that “rights and freedoms” may “in no case be exercised contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.” For perspective, that would be like the First Amendment saying Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech, unless Congress dislikes the speech. The UN declaration also assumes “rights” are bestowed by governments and treaties, whereas American traditions and jurisprudence are based on the idea that rights come from the Creator alone, and that governments exist merely to protect them.
Seen in that light, suddenly the UN's bizarre and increasingly frequent rants citing "human rights" to argue against free speech, due processeducational freedomparental rightsgun rights, the right to life, and so on make much more sense. Indeed, the UN's vision of “human rights” is entirely contradictory to real God-given rights. The two visions are incompatible. The only solution for Americans who value real rights and freedoms, then, is to ditch the UN and its extremist agenda in favor of the U.S. Constitution and the pre-existing rights it enshrines. Legislation to secure an American exit (or Amexit) from the UN, the American Sovereignty Restoration Act, is already in Congress. All that is required now is more public pressure. And as the UN becomes increasingly extreme — even electing the world's most brutal dictatorships to its “human rights” outfit — the pressure will almost certainly continue to build.




Published on Nov 8, 2016
Dr. Edward Group of the Global Healing Center breaks down how this years Flu shot could be the most harmful yet.

New Flu Shot Released to Cull (Kill) Public
Published on Nov 7, 2016
Alex Jones and Dr. Edward Group discuss the new flu shot and how it continually does more harm than good.

Registered Nurse Explains Why 
She Doesn't Get the Flu Shot


Butt-Hurt Crying Hillary Voters Compilation

♫ All Around Me Are Hillary Supporters ♫
Hillary Supporters Crying After Trump Victory
Published on Nov 9, 2016
Hillary supporters cry after she lost the election to Donald Trump. Even celebrities like Miley Cyrus and Perez Hilton couldn't hold back the tears after Hillary was defeated by President Trump. Media analyst Mark Dice has the story. 
People crying, leaving Clinton headquarters
Gloom and doom Hillary fans leave rally, 
dazed and crying
Published on Nov 9, 2016
Devastated Hillary Clinton supporters left New York's Javits Center dazed and weeping on Tuesday night, after it became clear their candidate was not going to win.
CalExit: Californians Call for Secession 
After Trump Victory
Published on Nov 9, 2016
Hillary supporters are hoping California will secede from the Union and become its own country since Donald Trump will become our next president. Media analyst Mark Dice has the story.
A Vote For Hillary Is (Was) A Vote For Lucifer

Published on Nov 9, 2016
Proverbs 13:20 reads "He that walketh with wise men shall be wise: but a companion of fools shall be destroyed.” Hubris riddled Hillary and her crony crew, on through a hard fought fraudulent campaign promising certain doom for the American Republic couldn’t have made it clearer where their spiritual allegiance lies. Surrounding themselves, throughout the campaign with Hillary’s spiritual base. Luciferians.
Remember folks a vote for Hillary is a vote for a decades old International Child Sex Trafficking Ring, Blood sacrifices, a headlong plunge into the United Nations Agenda 2030 and if you are war 3. But most importantly, a vote for Hillary Rodham Clinton is a vote for Hillary’s personal hero….Lucifer. Jon Bowne Reporting.

Insane Lady GaGa talks about 
Marina Abramović, Satanist


A message from Alex Jones: My fellow patriots, it is now breaking news that Donald J. Trump has defeated Crooked Hillary and her globalists allies in the face of rigged elections and incessant mainstream media lies. Whether you love or hate him, Trump's victory is a rallying cry to liberty lovers worldwide who are sick and tired of the bought and paid for establishment media feeding us a hearty diet of lies and disinformation. While we have a lot of work to do ahead, and we must continue to expose the crimes of Crooked Hillary and her cabal of Soros-backed operatives, I want to take a moment and thank YOU for all of your hard work in standing up against the takeover of America. 
SEE: below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

By Nelson Hultberg

November 9, 2016
Great day in the morning. The hated honchos of Washington and their media lackeys have been routed like seedy oligarchs in the Caribbean. Globalism has been roundly rejected. The Clinton Cartel has been told to take their insufferable governmentalism elsewhere.
Donald Trump has defied all odds and has won the Kentucky Derby as a thoroughbred with no prior races. He was counted out from the beginning by all "experts" everywhere. They treated him like they would treat an orangutan at a tea party. He was persona non grata on steroids. The pundits, the professors, the prognosticators, the bankers, moguls and institute heads all denounced this maverick tycoon turned politician.
"Bombastic, narcissistic, un-presidential," they shrieked. "Fraudulent, dangerous, predatory, a bully, a sexual abuser." No political candidate in the history of America, perhaps the world, has had to endure the scurrilous and disgraceful smear tactics that have been showered upon Donald Trump by his opponents on the left as well as the mealy-mouth RINOs on the right. But the man is a "force of nature." He did not wither. He fought back with an iron will, a tempestuous love of his country, and an unwavering belief that the people were as fed up with the snakes of Washington as he was.
FBI Reversal and Poll Rigging
Was James Comey's decision to reopen the email investigation of Clinton the deciding issue? It surely didn't hurt Trump, but he was closing strongly for ten days prior to Comey's announcement and, in my opinion, would have won anyway. However, because the establishment media believe so devoutly in the accuracy of the polls, they couldn't see this shift taking place. They were misled as to Hillary's strength. Most of the polls this year (certainly the popular establishment ones like CNN, Real Clear Politics, Monmouth, etc.) were simply not true.
What very few people understand is that the polls can be easily rigged if the pollsters are ideologically geared one way or the other. We all know that the media is 95% in the tank for Hillary. But what nobody talks about is the fact that most of the pollsters are "ideologically" for Hillary also. Thus they merely needed to shift their calling parameters ever so slightly and a few more Democrats got called than were warranted. The results showed up with an 8-point lead for Hillary when, if the calling had been done properly (strictly according to voter registrations), the race would have shown to be extremely close far sooner than it did. This closeness is what the IBD and Rasmussen polls were both showing shortly after the second debate on October 9th.
With Trump so unpopular among establishment people, however, it is very probable that many of the pollsters allowed themselves to move their parameters this year to the left and called more Democrats than were warranted. It's called "skewing" the poll to get the result you want. Everyone in the polling business knows this, but the media refuses to talk about it because they want to convey to the people that the polls possess "integrity."
On the contrary, the polls are not an objective snapshot of the people's preference. They are a "subjective" indication of what the pollsters have programmed into their surveys. Polls can, within limits, be made to come out however the pollsters want them to come out.
How do the pollsters justify this kind of unethical subjectivity? They rationalize their "skewing" as morally all right because in their minds Trump had to be stopped at all costs. The end justifies the means.
Can we say for sure that unethical "skewing" took place with many of the popular establishment polls? No, we can't. But when Trump is drawing 20,000 to his rallies while Clinton is drawing 800, yet shown to be leading Trump by 8 points, we are justified in believing something is wrong with such poll results and that human nature is probably at work distorting the truth.
The Major Problems Confronting Trump
America today confronts more serious problems than at any time in her history. Granted the Civil War, the Great Depression and World War II were not exactly halcyon days. But the country in those eras still retained its fundamental moral and cultural stability. Today there is decadence and doubt everywhere. Our basic confidence as a people has been shattered by a long insidious breakdown of social propriety, by the egregious brainwash of liberalism in our schools, and by the overweening stupidity and power lust of Keynesian ideologues at the Fed and throughout Washington.
Our nation is truly at a turning point. But thankfully with this election, America now has a chance to avert the New World Order. It is in no way guaranteed, of course. The crises that await us in the upcoming decades are enough to sink the strongest and most resilient of nations. But only Trump has a chance to solve these crises because only Trump, out of all the candidates out there this year, truly understood the immensity and the actuality of the crises facing us. And only he had the courage to touch these ideological third rails. Here are the four most critical of these dangers:
1. We have 25 million illegal aliens invading us, leeching jobs, and degrading our culture. The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) is lying to us with their 11 million figure. And it is not only lying about the illegals but also about inflation, GDP and unemployment, just as the Ministry of Truth in Nineteen Eighty-Four lied to the proles of Oceania. The BLS is our Ministry of Truth. No one in their right mind believes these fabricators about the number of illegals. gives us the true figure of 25 million.
2. Our trade policy organizations (such as NAFTA, WTO, TPP, etc.) have evolved into suffocating monstrosities for our manufacturing base. They are precisely what Ross Perot predicted with his famous 1992 debate declaration in his opposition to NAFTA: "That giant sucking sound you hear will be American jobs going south." GEI Analysis tells us that all told, America lost 28.7 million jobs between 1992 and 2010. The annual figures since then show improvement but at the slowest pace in forty years.
3. The inundation of our economy with tyrannical taxes and controls has been growing relentlessly for over five decades now. Tax rates are excruciating. Regulatory intervention from Washington reaches into every nook and cranny of our lives. Beltway commissars who have no grasp oflaissez-faire capitalism (having been taught the Marxist perversion of it in college) are appointed to dictate to and regulate major industries that sign 99-year contracts and oversee vast technological projects. If idiocy is our goal in governing, we are demonstrating immense prowess.
4. American foreign policy was for many years after World War II, at least, semi-rational. It recognized that the world was a highly imperfect array of countries and cultures most of which have never understood freedom and were locked into backward ways of life that were not amenable to alteration in the near term. The rule of geopolitics in this period, 1945-1995, was to vigilantly defend America but to refrain from wholesale regime changes in foreign countries. It was far from perfect, but it was not imperialistic. It was largely defensive as a proper foreign policy should be, and as our Founders prescribed.
Since 1995, however, American foreign policy has been taken over intellectually by the neoconservative element in Washington. And their desires are imperialistic. Their dreams are for hegemony over the Mideast, over Russia, even over Europe and China. Their vision is as dangerous as we have ever seen put forth by the scholars of international affairs throughout our history. The neocons seriously believe a nuclear war is winnable with Russia. They are consumed with unmitigated hubris; they wish to rule the world rather than defend the country.
Can Trump Succeed?
These are the paramount socio-political changes needed that Donald Trump faces in trying to "make America great again" – 1) radical immigration reform, 2) rational trade policy implementation, 3) substantial tax reduction and regulatory reform, 4) wholesale reworking of our foreign policy objectives, i.e., ending our police-the-world obsessions.
The American people have given their approval. The stars are aligned favorably. But can a fiery maverick tycoon come to Washington and tame the nefarious forces that control the city? Can Donald Trump, the preeminent "deal-maker," negotiate our country out of the convoluted briar patch of dangers now engulfing us? Not exactly. Keynesian economics and Marxian politics have been embedded in our system for 80 years. One presidential term has as much chance of strongly correcting these two sinister ideologies as a cub scout troop has of stopping the Ebola virus.
Nevertheless, Donald J. Trump is a consummate warrior. 
America is a nation of unparalleled "can-doers." The word "quit" is not found in the lexicon of either. Trump will not restore the Republic, but he can make great strides toward stemming the tide of horror that has been plaguing us for so many decades. He will appoint conservative judges to the Supreme Court, and during the coming economic meltdown, he will strive to lower taxes and purge regulations, not raise them and regiment the economy?
If he can serve two terms and be followed by eight years of Pence, this will keep the real America alive until perhaps the ideological fallacies dominating us can be tempered enough to stop our relentless drift into global government.
From the beginning the promise of America has faced "insurmountable challenges," and today is no different. But this election shows us that the majority of our citizens do not wish to embrace the pundit herd's message of collectivism so deceptively touted from the pulpits of CNN and the major networks. It shows us that millions of Americans reject globalism, that they can recognize a crook wrapped in the garb of a politician, that they have not sold out totally to the sham of "political correctness."
Strength of personality and correct ideology are the prime movers of history. Donald Trump possesses these two attributes in spades. Never bet against an American patriot with such gifts. America's future looks brighter than at any time in the past 25 years.
Trump speech at his election headquarters
Published on Nov 8, 2016
Donald Trump wins! Call him President Trump! Hillary collapses in devastating loss. Media analyst Mark Dice has the story.