Wednesday, August 3, 2016


SEE: below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

Khizr Khan wrote that any writings on judicial matters “must always be subordinated to the Shari’ah and open to reconsideration by all Muslims.”

Khizr Khan, the Muslim father of a slain American soldier, is an attorney who has previously written in a law journal about Islamic law. He specifically wrote about the purity of the Quran and the Sunnah over all other texts and interpretations.
Khan rose to fame after speaking at the Democratic National Convention Thursday and pulling out a pocket U.S. Constitution imploring if Donald Trump had even read it.
Khan wrote “Juristic Classification Of Islamic Law” in the Houston Journal of International Law in 1983. In it he breaks down different levels of Islamic law. Khan writes that the Quran and the Sunnah which were both directly created by the Muslim prophet Muhammad were the only sources in Muhammad’s lifetime that “were recognized as binding.”
“The Shari’ah-was completed during the lifetime of Prophet Muhammed, in the Quran and Sunnah. This brings up an important fact which is generally overlooked, that the invariable and basic rules of Islamic Law are only those prescribed in the Shari’ah (Quran and Sunnah), which are few and limited,” Khan continues to write. “All other juridical works which have been written during more than thirteen centuries are very rich and indispensable, but they must always be subordinated to the Shari’ah and open to reconsideration by all Muslims.”

Read the rest of the story here.
EXCERPT: "Notwithstanding his war-hero son’s genuinely patriotic example, Khizr M. Khan has published papers supporting the supremacy of Islamic law over “man-made” Western law — including the very Constitution he championed in his Democratic National Convention speech attacking GOP presidential nod Donald Trump."

"In 1983, for example, Khan wrote a glowing review of a book compiled from a seminar held in Kuwait called “Human Rights In Islam” in which he singles out for praise the keynote address of fellow Pakistani Allah K. Brohi, a pro-jihad Islamic jurist who was one of the closest advisers to late Pakistani dictator Gen. Zia ul-Haq, the father of the Taliban movement."

Khizr Khan specializes in visa programs accused of selling U.S. citizenship

Robert Spencer in FrontPage: Khizr Khan’s Saudi Ties

"Intelius records that Khizr Khan has worked at Hogan Lovells Llp. According to the Washington Free Beacon, “Hogan Lovells LLP, another U.S. firm hired by the Saudis, isregistered to work for the Royal Embassy of Saudi Arabia through 2016, disclosures show. Robert Kyle, a lobbyist from the firm, has bundled $50,850 for Clinton’s campaign.”
The Free Beacon added that the Saudi government has “supplied the Clinton Foundation with millions. The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia has given between $10 and $25 million to the foundation while Friends of Saudi Arabia has contributed between $1 and $5 million.”"

Roger Stone: Everything You Need to Know About Donald Trump and Khizr Khan

"The military service of the Khans’ son does not give the Khans immunity from fact checking about statements they made in their partisan support of Hillary Clinton. Specifically: Mr. Khan asked about Mr. Trump’s “sacrifice” without posing a similar question about Secretary Hillary Clinton — where was HER sacrifice? Despite his reverence for the U.S. Constitution, Mr. Khan  has not questioned the constitutionality of the Iraq War — which Hillary supported and his son died in. By using Mr. Khan as surrogate, Hillary Clinton has attempted to hide behind her own abysmal record as both Secretary of State and a U.S. Senator.  Not only has Hillary Clinton not made the sacrifices that Mr. Khan has talked about, but she has actually profited from her public service. It’s shameful to Capt. Kahn’s memory."
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

By Kelleigh Nelson August 3, 2016
Muslims are allowed to lie to unbelievers in order to defeat them. There are two forms:
Taqiyya - Saying something that isn't true as it relates to the Muslim identity.
Kitman - Lying by omission. An example would be when Muslim apologists quote only a fragment of verse 5:32 (that if anyone kills "it shall be as if he had killed all mankind") while neglecting to mention that the rest of the verse (and the next) mandate murder in undefined cases of "corruption" and "mischief."
Tawriya - Intentionally creating a false impression.
Muruna - 'Blending in' by setting aside some practices of Islam or Sharia in order to advance others.
Know When to Hold Them, Know When to Fold Them
I have been blessed to get inside the Trump Organization and speak to a great number of Trump’s people. I absolutely believe this man will do everything he can to straighten out our country and bring her back to a semblance of decency. I also love Mr. Trump, because I’ve done so much research on him. Having said that, he needs to know when to hold them, and know when to fold them, a la Kenny Rogers. He needs to know when to counterpunch and when to leave it alone. He should have told Mr. Khan, “I’m sorry your son died. I was against this middle east war, and had I been president, your son would still be alive today.”
The commie democrats and neo-con republicans don’t care about us or the Muslims infiltrating this country, they care only about power and money. The interests of the American citizens are not even in their scripted lies and propaganda to the American people! They don’t even mention it!
Hillary Hires Khan to Attack Trump
Khizr Khan caused a sensation the last night of the DNC convention when he and his wife took the stage (a stage with a wall around it), and challenged Donald J. Trump’s proposed ban on Muslim immigration. He even asked Mr. Trump if he had ever read the Constitution, and then stated that Mr. Trump had never sacrificed anything or anyone.
He said that Trump has a black soul. Well, Mr. Khan, Trump’s soul is probably the purest and most Godly soul we’ve seen in a Presidential candidate in decades. I wouldn’t even venture what kind of soul belongs to Hillary Clinton or Islamic terrorists. Actions speak so much louder than words, Mr. Khan! Trump took sharp offense, saying that, "While I feel deeply for the loss of his son, Mr. Khan who has never met me, has no right to stand in front of millions of people and claim I have never read the Constitution, (which is false) and say many other inaccurate things."
In previous remarks, Trump has acknowledged the positive contributions of most Muslims, while focusing on the need to fight radical Islamic terror.
Of course Mr. Khan never made any mention of radical Islam or terrorists who for hundreds of years have attacked and brutally murdered innocent men, women and children and even animals. According to a recent Breitbart article, Khan claimed that terrorists have nothing to do with Islam. I have to wonder if Mr. Khan has ever read the Hadith or Quran.
He also falsely claimed that the Constitution does not allow a ban on Muslim immigration, and walls on our borders are unconstitutional.
The audience immediately reacted with applause. However, Khan apparently chose to disregard the American legal system which operates under the Constitution. The president actually does have the authority to implement such an immigration ban. Democrat Jimmy Carter used it when he banned Iranians from entering our country in 1980. (Not to mention Theodore Roosevelt and Dwight D. Eisenhower)
Title 8, Section 1182(f) specifically states:
Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate.
The 1952 McCarren-Walter Act, motivated by concerns over communist subversion also allows for restrictions. This law was written by two Democrats and required immigrants to be of good moral character, to honor and uphold the principles of the Constitution, and to assimilate into American society. Only those who were willing to accept these conditions were allowed into the country.
Gold Star Mothers
Mrs. Khan, is a Gold Star mother, and as such she is off limits for any comments. I find it sad that after 12 years she couldn’t have said something about her son while she was on the stage with her husband. All Gold Star mothers are highly respected by veterans as well as they should be by all Americans.
Humayun S. M. Khan, posthumously awarded the Purple Heart and Bronze Star, was just 27 years old when he was killed in Operation Iraqi Freedom on June 8th, 2004 by a taxi car bomb that exploded in his base. According to the Department of Defense Captain Khan was an exemplary soldier, and served the US military with distinction. He saved the lives of those around him telling them to “hit the dirt” moving toward the speeding vehicle to intercept it.
Hillary on Sean Smith’s Mother, Patricia
When Hillary called Patricia Smith a liar after her speech at the RNC convention, where Mrs. Smith stated that Hillary lied to her, the media and DNC colluded to besmirch Mrs. Smith. She lost her son, Sean, because Hillary Clinton and the administration refused to send much needed help to Benghazi. It is just fine for the media to attack one mother who has lost a child because of the incompetence and disregard for human life of this administration and Hillary Clinton in particular.  However, because Mr. Trump intimated that Mrs. Khan didn’t speak because she’s a good Muslim wife, his statement created a whirlwind of controversy, as though he’d attacked a Gold Star mother, which is not what he was doing or saying at all. He knows full well that in Islam, women are second-class citizens, and that is what he was referring to with only her husband speaking at the convention.
The double-standard is glaring and so very obvious. Hillary, whose negligence contributed to Sean Smith’s death, essentially called Patricia Smith a liar on national TV, and few in the media objected. Some, in fact, joined Clinton’s attack. And what was done to Sean Smith’s mother when she lost her son because of Hillary’s incompetence, is far worse than anything Mr. Trump has said.  Just Who is Khizr Khan?
Breitbart’s article, “Clinton Cash: Khizr Khan’s Deep Legal, Financial Connections to Saudi Arabia, Hillary’s Clinton Foundation Tie Terror, Immigration, Email Scandals Together,” states that Khizr Khan has deep ties to the government of Saudi Arabia, and to international Islamist investors through his own law firm. His website was deleted because it clearly stated Khan has ties to controversial immigration programs that wealthy foreigners can use to essentially buy their way into the United States, and he has deep ties to the “Clinton Cash” narrative through the Clinton Foundation. One of his specific areas of practice, according to the deleted website, is “E2 Treaty Investors, EB5 Investments & Related Immigration Services.” He specializes in Visa programs accused of selling US citizenship.
Remember that Hillary Clinton has received $25 million plus from the Saudi’s through the Clinton Foundation.
Khan, according to Intelius as also reported by Walid Shoebat, used to work at the law firm Hogan Lovells, LLP, a major D.C. law firm that has been on retainer as the law firm representing the government of Saudi Arabia in the United States for years, which the Washington Free Beacon exposed weeks ago.
This same firm handles Hillary Clinton’s taxes and has since 2004, and is also connected to the email scandal. They think they’re fooling us…no way.
The article states that Khan is a promoter of Islamic Sharia Law in the U.S. He was a co-founder of the Journal of Contemporary Issues in Muslim Law (Islamic Sharia). Khan’s fascination with Islamic Sharia stems from his life in Saudi Arabia. During the eighties, Khan wrote a paper titled Juristic Classification of Islamic [Sharia] Law. In it he elucidated on the system of Sharia law expressing his reverence for “The Sunnah [the works of Muhammad] — authentic tradition of the Prophet Muhammad (Peace be upon him).”
According to Theodore Shoebat and Walid Shoebat, Mr. Khizr Khan is a promoter of Islamic sharia law and a co-founder of the Journal of Contemporary Issues in Muslim Law (sharia). In fact, in the past, Khirz Khan has shown "his appreciation for an icon of the Muslim Brotherhood" by the name of Said Ramadan, who "wrote material for the Muslim Youth Movement of Malaysia, an organization that has been promoting Islamic revivalism and indoctrination to recruit young people in Malaysia to jihadism." Mr. Said Ramadan was the son-in-law of Hassan al-Banna, the founder of the Muslim Brotherhood including Ahmad Bahefzallah, “the boss of Huma Abedin (Hillary Clinton's aide)."
Khizr Khan wrote that any writings on judicial matters “must always be subordinated to the Shari’ah and open to reconsideration by all Muslims.”
Should this connection give us pause? Absolutely, it should!!!!!!
Despite what David Barton or Khan may believe, Sharia Law and the Constitution are not compatible.
In an effort toward clarification, Donald Trump released a statement:
“Captain Humayun Khan was a hero to our country, and we should honor all who have made the ultimate sacrifice to keep our country safe. The real problems here are the radical Islamic terrorists who killed him, and the efforts of these radicals to enter our country to do us further harm. Given the state of the world today, we have to know everything about those looking to enter our country, and given the state of chaos in some of these countries, that is impossible.”
 Moreover, Trump reiterated that "Captain Khan, killed 12 years ago, was a hero, but this is about RADICAL ISLAMIC TERROR and the weakness of our 'leaders' to eradicate it!"
A Blue Star mother wrote a letter to Mr. Khan that was brutal in its response. Here is that letter, and it needs to be read by every American who loves freedom and liberty. Please let me know that you’ve read it!
Mr. Trump is again right, and righteous! He holds us all to a higher standard for the citizens of our country.
"To the Muslim Gold Star father that spoke at the DNC…..I have some thoughts on your comments. I am a Blue Star mother. My deepest condolences on the loss of your son. No family should have to endure such a loss. That being said….while your son is a hero, you Sir, are NOT. My son has served three tours of combat in the countries you and your family came from. Iraq and Afghanistan were his introduction to adulthood and service to something bigger than our individual selves. He was blown up by an IED set by your countrymen. His Purple Heart is a testament to his love of America and our freedoms. I have suffered through his multiple combat tours in Iraq and Afghanistan….never knowing from moment to moment if he would return home in a flag draped coffin. It is torture when a mother wakes up to this day after day and sees the atrocities happening over there on the news and being helpless to change a thing. My comments to you will probably offend you. I do not apologize. These things need to be said. Unlike you, I could NEVER use my son’s death as a pawn piece in support of a woman that left “America’s treasure” (Hillarys words) to die unaided in Benghazi. The same woman that says vile things to her military details there to protect her. You, Sir, are supposed to be a witness to your son’s bravery and sacrifice. Instead you stood on a stage and promoted the woman that upholds the very people that killed your son. You became a political PAWN that promotes pandering to our enemy. You desecrated your son’s memory by your words. You did not utter one word of outrage at anyone but Donald Trump. Are you forgetting that Trump did not kill your son. He had nothing whatsoever to do with these wars. His memory should mean more to you than five minutes of fame on the stage of the party that voted to send your son to war. The same party that for eight years has denied and cheated our veterans out of their deserved medical care. Who for the last three years has cut our veterans pay. Of note…your wife stood SILENT. She stood with her head covered, never uttering a word about her loss. She submitted to you being her voice in front of the country. She abdicated her free voice to you… would any good Sharia wife and mother. Let me say, this was not lost on the other American military moms….myself included. Had it been my son being “used” as a political PROP, no one could have silenced me. I would be voicing my grief, my pride, my love of him to the world. A man cannot speak to a mothers loss. No man knows her heart at the loss of a child. She did her heroic son a disservice by her silence. She should have uncovered her head and her heart to be the American mother you claim. And last if all….you dared to flash your pocket Constitution and ask if Trump has read it. I dare to ask you, Sir….HAVE YOU READ IT? If you say yes, then I dare ask you HOW you could represent that party? HOW can you support this woman? How can you affiliate your family with a party and candidate that cannot even call the radicals that killed your son what they are? How can you support a current administration that diminishes your son’s death by denying he had an enemy? And if you have read our Constitution, how could you cover your soulmate in colorful submissive sheets and have the audacity to speak FOR her? Your son died for that Constitution you so carelessly waved around on national TV in support of the very party that exists to destroy it. As a soldier’s mother….NO ONE could ever speak for me. I find your outrage artificial. I find your party affiliation offensive. I find your wife’s silence atrocious and offensive. I find YOU a political FOOL. I find your son to have been your greatest accomplishment, and you, Sir, have dishonored him. I hope you memorize that pocket constitution so you will understand what it means to be a REAL American and hero. You are not one. You were USED. Your son WOULD NOT be proud of you. My only hope is that when MY son goes a fourth time to combat radical Islamic terrorist’s, ( and he WILL) he will know that his mother never stood submissively SILENT about an American hero. Yes, your son was a hero that could not be manipulated but, you, Sir, are a weak minded FOOL. I would love to hear your thoughts this morning about the 1500 American soldiers on the air base in Turkey being held as basic hostages as I type. Not a word from this president or party you adore…or the media that so thoroughly manipulated and used you and your wife. So…what say you Sir??? What will you say to a Blue and Gold Star family if these heroes die? In my opinion, you will say NOTHING."


Acting ATF Director Thomas E. Brandon
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

Deputy Director Thomas Brandon (shown on right), head of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) appeared on CBS’s Sunday Morning television show, complaining that his agency is “a small agency with a big job” and that he really needs more agents and more money to do that job.
What he would really like, however, is a computerized database of all gun purchases made by every buyer and seller in the country:
There’s a lot of things that don’t make sense.… Would [having such a database at the ATF] be efficient and effective? Absolutely. Would the taxpayers benefit with [improved] public safety? Absolutely. Are we allowed to do it? No.
Brandon took over the agency in April 2015 after Todd Jones bailed out following the agency’s failed attempt to ban ammunition for the popular AR-15 rifle. Jones had taken over the agency after Kenneth Melson bailed out in 2011 following the implosion of the ATF’s Fast and Furious gun-walking scandal.
The Ammunition Ban
The ATF claimed in March 2015 that its effort to ban so-called armor-piercing M855 green tip ammunition chambered for the 5.56 semi-automatic rifle “reflected a good faith interpretation” of the law. The agency tried to sell its bill stating that large handguns were now chambered for that specific round and, consequently, represented a new threat to law enforcement. The agency claimed that law enforcement wanted the ban, that the cartridge was the same that was used in multiple mass shootings around the country, that the new generation of weaponry can now be concealed, and, finally, armor-piercing bullets had no business being in the hands of the public.
However, facts that proved all those claims to be lies ended, temporarily, the ATF’s quest. Only a few “selected” friends of the ATF and the Obama administration actually favored the ban; none of the mass shootings involved the use of the specific round to be banned; not one statistic could be found to show a law-enforcement official being shot, much less killed, by a handgun chambered for the “green tip” M855 cartridge; the new pistols capable of chambering the cartridge remain so large and bulky that they are nearly impossible to conceal; and, finally, they are so expensive that they are shunned by common street thugs in favor of more common and cheaper handguns. Those cheap guns are fueled by .38 caliber or 9mm rounds, but the agency said nothing about them. The ATF’s attack was on the AR-15.
The agency’s attempt, had it succeeded, would have opened the door for the agency to ban all ammunition. The M855 round is made of certain materials — steel, bronze, copper, beryllium, and tungsten — that, according to the agency, automatically make it “armor piercing.” But once that door is opened, the ban would set a precedent for the ATF to ban any ammunition made with those same materials. Voila! No ammo, no guns!
The agency backed off after “the vast majority of the comments [on the proposed ban] received to date were critical of [it].”
Fast and Furious
Jones became the ATF director following the resignation of Kenneth Melson, who resigned in the aftermath of the gun-walking scandal known as “Fast and Furious.” According to John Caile, writing for in June 2011,
The alleged purpose of this insane program was to allow American and Mexican law enforcement officials to track where the guns came from and where they went, in order to facilitate identifying and prosecuting members of the drug cartels.
But there was more to this phony narrative, much more. Wrote Caile:
After a number of the tracked guns were used in criminal acts, the plan was that Mexico would make a very loud and vigorous "protest" to the U.S. government, demanding that "something be done" about all those American guns that are "flooding into Mexico" — giving Obama a talking point in order to ratchet up U.S. gun control, while providing Mexican officials with a convenient scapegoat for their own inability to stop the carnage. Both the American and the Mexican administrations win.
There was even more. Had the scam succeeded, Obama would have all the executive power he needed to ban all weapons, without any congressional input:
Once the "gun problem" involved relations between two sovereign nations, it would then no longer be merely a domestic matter, it would be an international "crisis" — a matter of foreign policy. And in case you forgot your high school civics, foreign policy is the sole province of the Executive Branch, in other words, the President.
Which means Barak Obama would have had a whole range of options previously unavailable in his war on guns.
The president could push through an international agreement with Mexico, which would naturally involve "measures to control the flow of illegal guns" — like closing down gun shows, for example. He could also sign on to an even broader "small arms" treaty like the one the U.N. has had simmering on the back burner for several years. Or, he could simply issue a series of Executive Orders.
It was an effort to implement gun control based upon the intentional allowal of murders and other crimes using guns sold at the behest of the U.S. government.
And while Deputy Director Thomas Brandon may not be advocating anything so crass, he is propagating falsehoods, as have the former heads of ATF — this time about a gun registration program, saying it would be efficient and, apparently, cost effective.
Forbes writer Daniel Fisher, who makes no bones about the fact that he wants to highly regulate guns, in 2013 pointed out some facts about gun registration that was attempted in Canada, a country with a fraction of America's populace.
The law passed and starting in 1998 Canadians were required to have a license to own firearms and register their weapons with the government. According to Canadian researcher (and gun enthusiast) Gary Mauser, the Canada Firearms Center quickly rose to 600 employees and the cost of the effort climbed past $600 million. In 2002 Canada’s auditor general released a report saying initial cost estimates of $2 million (Canadian) had increased to $1 billion as the government tried to register the estimated 15 million guns owned by Canada’s 34 million residents.
... There was also the question of how registering guns was supposed to reduce crime and suicide in the first place. From 1997 to 2005, only 13% of the guns used in homicides were registered. Police studies in Canada estimated that 2-16% of guns used in crimes were stolen from legal owners and thus potentially in the registry. The bulk of the guns, Canadian officials concluded, were unregistered weapons imported illegally from the U.S. by criminal gangs.
Finally in 2011, conservatives led by Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper voted to abolish the long-gun registry and destroy all its records.
The Canadian scheme was abominably expensive, and it only covered long guns. Not surprisingly, criminals didn't register their guns, and the registration scheme didn't help lower the number of shootings, either.
Brandon doesn't need a gun registration computer program to do his job. And, in fact, so much of his agency’s “mission” is outside the constitutional powers granted to the executive branch that Representative James Sensenbrenner (R-Wis.) is correct when he said, “I think we ought to get rid of the ATF,” and giving it additional funds to pay for a searchable database of every gun, and gun owner, in the country amounts to “de facto gun registration.”
George Washington was right when he declared that “Government is not reason; it is not eloquence; it is force. Like fire it is both a dangerous servant and a fearful master.” Brandon’s agency of 5,000 employees spending a billion dollars a year to oppress the citizenry needs to be defunded immediately and completely.


Obama Panics, Declares Trump Unfit
Published on Aug 2, 2016
Obama is in a panic, coming out attacking Donald Trump, afraid Trump will undo all the work he's done for his globalist masters.
Trump Bludgeoned As Hillary Gets Away With Murder
Published on Aug 2, 2016
The Mainstream Media press has declared war on Donald Trump. Favoring what their globalist masters have ordered their propagandized professions to twist into pretzel logic to sway the vote towards Hillary Clinton. Donald Trump didn’t take too kindly to the attack on his character by Muslim father Khizr Khan at the DNC. Notice how the Clinton News Network presided over the ongoing smear campaign?

Meanwhile a real criminal offense is occurring, Kurt Nimmo writes " In 2013 Hillary Clinton lied to Congress. During testimony on the Benghazi attack, Clinton denied she knew anything about the “rat line” running weapons from Libya to jihadis in Syria, including AL-Qaeda and the Islamic State.
Lying to Congress is a serious offense. It can result in a five-year maximum prison sentence. If the lie involves terrorism, the maximum prison sentence under Section 1001 of US Code is eight years.

Not only did Clinton know about the arms program, she oversaw it. Memos retrieved from the Benghazi compound show Clinton’s State Department was involved in weapons transfers.

Julian Assange told Democracy Now Wiki Leaks has emails that will further demonstrate Clinton’s role.

Assange told Democracy Now said. “...the disastrous, absolutely disastrous intervention in Libya, the destruction of the Gaddafi government, which led to the occupation of ISIS of large segments of that country, weapons flows going over to Syria, being pushed by Hillary Clinton, into jihadists within Syria, including ISIS, that’s there in those emails. There’s more than 1,700 emails in Hillary Clinton’s collection, that we have released, just about Libya alone.”


Czech President Calls For Arming Citizens to Defend Against Terrorism

Demand for firearms surges throughout Europe

SEE: below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

Czech President MiloŇ° Zeman has completely reversed his stance on gun control in light of the recent terrorist attacks in Europe, calling for a new law that would allow citizens to be armed to defend themselves against jihadists.
Having previously been against private gun ownership, Zeman now says“citizens should arm themselves” to deal with the threat of terrorism.
“Earlier I spoke often about limiting the ability to have large quantities of weapons. But after the terrorist attacks, I have changed the idea,” Zeman told
Zeman also called for a fence to be built along the country’s border “if there were a large inflow of illegal migrants,” while also urging failed asylum seekers to be deported more quickly.
“Condemning terror attacks is easy, the only solution is doing away with the causes,” said Zeman.
The Czech Republic is not the only European country in which demand for firearms has seen a resurgence since the spate of terror attacks and migrant crime waves over the last year.
As we reported last month, a councilor in southern France wrote about how residents of his town were gearing up for civil war by joining gun clubs, which memberships having quadrupled in the last few months alone.
Meanwhile in Germany, which has been hit with several terror attacks over the last 2 weeks as well as the mass molestation of women by migrants in Cologne and Hamburg on New Year’s Eve, self-defense weapons are also flying off the shelves.
Requests for weapons permits hit record highs in 2016, with “people wanting to purchase non-lethal weapons (coming) from all sections of society, “be it workers or professors.”
Demand for blank-firing and gas pistols and flare guns is up 50% on last year, with 402,301 small arms carry permits being requested.
Contrast this to the situation in the United Kingdom, where citizens arebeing told they should “run away as far as possible” if Islamic State terrorists launch an attack on London.
Presumably, authorities are content to witness another Paris-style massacre, where unarmed victims were left as sitting ducks, with no bullets going in the other direction, a scenario that left 130 dead and 368 injured.


Obama Admin Airlifted $400,000,000 
to Iran as Americans Freed
SEE: below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

Seemingly violating the claim that America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists and hostage takers, reports have revealed that the Obama administration organized an airlift to transport $400 million in cash to Tehran which coincided with the January release of four Americans taken prisoner by Iran.

Reports say wooden pallets stacked with a variety of currencies were loaded onto an unmarked cargo plane and flown to Iran. American officials procured the money from banks in Switzerland and the Netherlands, according to the The Wall Street Journal report.
The money was purportedly only the first installment of a $1.7 billion deal the Obama administration reached with Iran over an arms deal brokered with the Shah of Iran just before the Mullah’s took over in 1979.
But the payments also came just as Iran was releasing Washington Postreporter Jason Rezaian, former U.S. Marine Amir Hekmati, Christian pastor Saeed Abedini, and Nosratollah Khosravi-Roodsari in January of this year.
Iranian news sources reported at the time that the prisoners were released in a “prisoner swap” brokered by the Obama administration.
The administration returned seven Iranian prisoners in exchange for the release of the Americans. Obama also dropped extradition proceedings against another 14 Iranians as part of the deal.
Not only did the administration return seven Iranians but it was said the Obama also agreed to drop U.S. sanctions against Iran as the nuclear deal was being crafted. It was felt that the prisoner release was meant to keep Republicans from criticizing Obama’s nuclear deal.
Republicans, though, felt at the time that the deal was lopsided in favor of the Mullahs.
However, no mention was made of the secret transfer of $400 million in cash to Iran until now.
The Obama administration has now denied that the amazing amount of cash had anything to do with the hostage release agreement.
“As we’ve made clear, the negotiations over the settlement of an outstanding claim … were completely separate from the discussions about returning our American citizens home,” State Department spokesman John Kirby told the Journal. “Not only were the two negotiations separate, they were conducted by different teams on each side, including, in the case of The Hague claims, by technical experts involved in these negotiations for many years.”
Arkansas Republican Senator Tom Cotton criticized the revelations accusing Obama of paying a “ransom to the ayatollahs for U.S. hostages.”
“This break with long-standing U.S. policy put a price on the head of Americans, and has led Iran to continue its illegal seizures” of Americans, Cotton said.
A group of Republicans have now called for an inquiry on the transfer of cash.

Benghazi Hero: Iran 'Ransom' Sets Dangerous Precedent, Endangers Americans




Calais 4
SEE: below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

A truck driver passing through Calais has been threatened by an illegal immigrant wielding a chainsaw, during a night of violence which also saw a lorry set on fire and cab windows smashed.

No one was hurt during the dangerous encounters, but both UKIP and the Freight Transport Association (FTA) have called for action warning that it is only a matter of time before a driver is killed.

Locals have described a “night of violence” as “rioting” migrants dragged debris onto the motorway leading to the port and set fire to it in a bid to slow lorries down enough to smash their way inside.
One Belgian lorry driver reported being threatened with a chainsaw as he tried to reach the port. His boss has begged the authorities: “Please do something, there will be deaths. Our drivers are threatened every night.”
UKIP MEP Mike Hookem, who has been campaigning for better protection for British lorry drivers in Calais, agreed, warning that the situation “will end up with someone being killed unless the government gets their act together”.
He told Breitbart London: “If migrants are now arming themselves with chainsaws then drivers might start to think they need to be able to defend themselves because the situation is out of control with people desperate to come to Britain.”
Despite efforts by the French authorities earlier this year to clear the notorious Jungle migrant camp on the outskirts of Calais, the number of migrants using the camp as a base from which to make the journey to the UK has now risen to a new high of around 7,000.
The local major, Natacha Bouchart, has vowed to once again clean out the camp but migrants are unwilling to move into official accommodation amid concerns that they will be forced by the authorities to register for asylum.
“I’ve heard many migrants tell me personally they will do anything to get to the UK and they have no interest in staying in France because they don’t speak the language and they won’t get a house, education and health care,” Mr Hookem said.
Lawlessness is rife at the camp; just a week ago an Ethiopian was hacked to death and six others severely injured during a brawl between 200 Afghans and Africans which broke out in the early hours of Tuesday morning.
Yet while the authorities puzzle over how to handle the situation, drivers are expected to daily run the gauntlet to ensure that goods continue to travel between the UK and the continent.
Chris Yarsley, FTA’s EU Affairs Manager, called for practical measures to move the Jungle away from the port. “These drivers are just trying to do their job, moving goods from Europe to the UK through the country’s busiest port,” he said.
“Attacks like this are unacceptable and more needs to be done to protect them as they go about their work.
“A robust process must be put in place to quickly deal with applications from genuine asylum seekers rather than economic migrants and move them out of the camp. Relocating the camp away from the port would prevent the relentless attacks on commercial vehicles passing close by and allow our members to carry out their job without fear of attack or fines for unwittingly carrying migrants on their trucks.”
Mr. Hookem warned that not responding would only exacerbate the situation. “These drivers are doing vital work for the UK so we need to look after them,” he said.
“I’ve seen the response from the French police and it is not sufficient. It needs some military backup to get this situation under control but of course the last two governments have completely run our Armed Forces into the ground whilst expecting their work load to stay the same.
“Drivers themselves will start looking to defend themselves and we could see this spilling over into a civil war on the streets of Calais thanks to EU open borders and the UK government’s negligence of our border force.”