Friday, June 5, 2015


SEE: below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

The National Security Agency (NSA) may have been forced to take a stutter step in its surveillance program (or resort to methods not made public) earlier this week regarding the collecton of metadata under the PATRIOT Act, but there is another agency that is more secretive, more invasive, and  has more information on you than could be gathered from your metadata.
Gawker’s Phase Zero reports on the scope of this shadow agency’s surveillance:
If you have a telephone number that has ever been called by an inmate in a federal prison, registered a change of address with the Postal Service, rented a car from Avis, used a corporate or Sears credit card, applied for nonprofit status with the IRS, or obtained non-driver’s legal identification from a private company, they have you on file.
The agency is the National Security Analysis Center (NSAC), a shadow branch of the U.S. Justice Department that employees over 400 people (including nearly 300 analysts) and boasts an annual budget of over $150 million.
As with so many other departments designed to seize our liberty and exchange it for “safety” from “terrorists,” the NSAC was created in the wake of the attacks of September 11, 2001 and was tasked with identifying any other similar threats that may have sneaked into the United States with similar purposes.
Post-9/11, however, the bureau’s mission shifted to include scanning the country for “domestic terrorists,” too. Phase Zero reports:
NSAC was created to focus scrutiny on new threat, specifically on Americans, particularly Muslims, who might pose a hidden threat (the [Foreign Terrorist Tracking] Task Force became a unit within NSAC’s bureaucratic umbrella). As Americans began traveling abroad to join al-Shabaab and then ISIS, the Center’s dragnet expanded to catch the vast pool of “youth” who also might fit a profile of either radicalism or law-breaking. Its mission runs the full gamut of “national security the United States and its interests,” according to a partially declassified Justice Department Inspector General report. That includes everything from terrorism to counter-narcotics, nuclear proliferation, and espionage.
How is the mission accomplished? Phase Zero reports that “in partnership with the military,” the NSAC conducts:
deep background investigations of foreign-born and foreign-connected soldiers, civilians, and contractors working for the government. Its investigations go far beyond traditional security “vetting”; NSAC scours certain select government employees, contractors and their affiliates, examining multiple layers of connected relatives and associates. And the Center hosts dozens of additional “liaison” officers from other government agencies, providing those agencies with frictionless access to private information about U.S. residents that they would otherwise not have.
Using access to databases of information available only to its analysts, the NSAC drills deep into the Internet to collect and collate data on anyone who happens to fit a profile programmed into its surveillance software. In other words: data mining. Phase Zero lays out the when and how of the program:
Homeland Security Presidential Directive-2 (HSPD-2), signed by George W. Bush in October 2001, established FTTTF and directed it to use “advanced data mining software” to find and prevent “aliens who engage in or support terrorist activity” from entering the United States. Though data mining was at the center of its mission, other agencies—particularly the Defense Advanced Projects Research Agency (DARPA) and the Pentagon’s Counterintelligence Field Activity (CIFA)—funded the development of many of the techniques.
The American people have repeatedly rejected the notion of a domestic intelligence agency operating within our borders. Yet NSAC has become the real-world equivalent. Along the way in its development though, the Center has rarely been discussed in the federal budget or in congressional oversight hearings available to the public. And being neither solely a part of the intelligence community (IC) nor solely a law enforcement agency (and yet both), it skirts limitations that exist in each community, allowing it to collect and examine information on people who are not otherwise accused of or suspected of any crime.
Thus making every American a suspect and turning the Constitution into nothing more than the easily pierced parchment barrier that the Founders feared it would become in the custody of the corrupt.
Due process is the bane of this type of data mining and despite the recent rapid growth of the latter, the former has been a reliable protection against despotism for nearly a millennium.
Turning its focus away from potential overseas dangers to those growing in its own backyard, as part of Project Scarecrow, the NSAC began monitoring those affiliated with the so-called “sovereign citizen” movement and others it deemed “domestic threats.”
The scope of the surveillance extended beyond Americans, however. NSAC, in partnership with police, "batch-matched dates of birth with licensed drivers to isolate a set of Pakistani men thought to be potentially connected to a terrorist group. The identities of foreign-born or connected hazardous materials (HAZMAT) drivers in the U.S. were added to a group of 'special interest individuals' constantly run against suspect datasets."
Phase Zero obtained a cache of incriminating documents that revealed that the NSAC and the Task Force uses "data from many divergent public, government and international sources for the purpose of monitoring the electronic footprints of terrorists and their supporters, identifying their behaviors, and providing actionable intelligence to appropriate law enforcement, government agencies, and the intelligence community."
Constitutionalists should catch several problematic phrases in that ostensibly “patriotic” purpose.
First, what is a terrorist? Isn’t a terrorist a person convicted of committing terror, the same as a murderer is a person convicted of murder? Not in the United States of 2015. 
Since the signing of the National Defense Authorization Act of 2012 (NDAA), the United States has become a battlefield and every American is a potential “covered person,” meaning a person covered by the provisions of that act that would permit the president to apprehend (kidnap, in less euphemistic language) anyone he alone suspects of having some sort of association with terrorists.
That brings us to the second problem: What does the NSAC mean when it targets those suspected of beings “supporters” of terrorists?
Fearing that this type of language potentially could be applied to journalists and that the specter of such a scenario would have a chilling effect on free speech and freedom of the press in violation of the First Amendment, award-winning journalist Chris Hedges filed a lawsuit on January 12, 2012 challenging the constitutionality of the NDAA.
Hedges claims that his extensive work overseas, particularly in the Middle East, could qualify him as a “covered person” who, by way of such writings, interviews and/or communications, had “substantially supported” or “directly supported” “al-Qaeda, the Taliban or associated forces. 
Similar concerns exist in the equally vague language of the NSAC’s internal memo published by Phase Zero. It is nearly indisputable in the contemporary climate of near-constant surveillance that the NSAC would use its terrorist tracking mandate to gather and store personal information on millions of Americans who’ve done nothing remotely connected to anything that could be construed as a threat to national security.
Thanks to the Phase Zero report it is now known that, regarding the scope of the surveillance:
An average of 6,000 target packages a month are prepared by the Center, many resulting in leads to law enforcement authorities, but the majority just human metadata living in perpetual link analysis limbo. The volume of data open to Center, and the complex queries made have resulted in the Task Force building four unique software systems to manage analyst access and data management.
Tax money is being taken from Americans and used to build the walls of the Panopticon higher and higher, making each of us a prisoner within walls we work to pay for.
So, while the NSA servers are temporarily shut down, the computers at the super-secret NSAC continue monitoring and mining personal data of millions of unsuspecting Americans.


Jade Helm 15 Psyop On America Begins Early

“Joint Assistant for Deployment and Execution” “Homeland Eradication of Local Militants”

Published on Jun 5, 2015
On Tuesday the residents of Flint, Michigan were rattled by explosions that resulted from a secretive Jade Helm 15 urban Army Exercise. When the local representative was asked why the locals weren’t warned in advance his response was as typical as it is ominous. The Michigan Air National Guard published a warning just hours before they began night flying helicopter drills from the Selfridge Air National Guard Base into the surrounding area of Mount Clemens Michigan.

Jade Helm 15 appears to be underway. According to U.S. Army Special Operations Command urban drills conducted by all 4 branches of the military are to begin in Texas,New Mexico,Arizona,California,Nevada,Utah,Mi­ssissippi,Florida,and Louisiana from July 15 through September 15, 2015. The State of Colorado and two Texas counties requested to be dropped off of the list of potential mock war zones. Clearly the Flint Michigan June 2, 2015 exercises are way ahead of schedule. And no warning was given?

Jade Helm stands for “Joint Assistant for Deployment and Execution” “Homeland Eradication of Local Militants”. This can only mean the returning veterans at the top of the department of homeland security’s domestic terrorist list. Back in 2009, the FBI launched Operation Vigilant Eagle, a nationwide operation that targeted militia/sovereign-citizen extremist groups, with their sites set on veterans returning from Iraq and Afghanistan. The Wall Street Journal reported on the memo trail that led months later to the desk of then DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano’s desk. Janet Napolitano warned of a surge of domestic right wing terror groups that would recruit returning veterans into their fold in order to carry out attacks similar to the blatantly staged Oklahoma City Bombing. The Posse Comitatus Act prohibits the use of federal military personnel to "execute the laws”. Regardless, the Feds interpret the language as it may apply to troops used in an advisory, support, disaster response, or other homeland defense role, as opposed to domestic law enforcement.


Screen Shot 2015-06-04 at 4.06.38 PM

(Friday Church News Notes, June 5, 2015,, 866-295-4143) - 

Soulfest in Gilford, New Hampshire, one of the biggest contemporary Christian music festivals, is Exhibit A that music is at the heart of the one-world “church.” Since at least 2002, the festival has had a Roman Catholic presence, and this year promises more of the same. The August 6-8 festival will feature a daily Catholic Mass and performances by Roman Catholic musician Matt Maher. Joining hands with Rome this year are some of the most popular and influential CCM groups and artists, including Big Daddy Weave, Switchfoot, Kari Jobe, Third Day, Natalie Grant, For King & Country, Toby Mac, David Crowder, Mandisa, Thousand Foot Krutch, Britt Nicole, Scott Stapp, The Vespers, Peter Furler, Rachel Taylor, The Wrecking, Andy Needham Band, Epic Season, Kardia, Chasing Cooper, Sleeping Giant, Five Iron Frenzy, Steve Taylor, Children 18:3, Bread of Stone, 3 Shades of Blue, Sanctus Real, The Violet Burning, I Am Clay, Chelsea Amber, Nibba, Exit 244, Jo Petty Band, and All 4Faith. Also participating are Word of Life Fellowship and the Salvation Army. Bands and artists participating in past Soulfests include Skillet, Casting Crowns, Family Force 5, Phil Joel, Chris Tomlin, Jeremy Camp, Jars of Clay, Mercy Me, Audio Adrenaline, P.O.D., Michael W. Smith, Rebecca St. James, Steven Curtis Chapman, The Call, Sam Phillips, BarlowGirl, Israel Houghton, and Bethany Dillon. Roman Catholic leaders use the Mass as a mystical tool to recapture “lapsed Catholics.” Commenting on the 2009 Soulfest, the Catholic News Agency observed, “Among the various Christian denominations represented at Soulfest, the Catholic presence was significant. Daily Mass was celebrated Thursday through Saturday at 10 a.m., with a lively music ministry guided by the talented Matt Maher, one of the most popular, critically-acclaimed Catholic musicians in the country. ... David Simon ... explained how wonderful it is to have daily Mass at Soulfest. ‘It’s an opportunity for Catholics who left the Church to want to come home; it’s such an opportunity to see the power of the Eucharist’” (“Strong Catholic Presence at Large Music Festival,” Catholic News Agency, Aug. 13, 2009). The Catholic Mass has occultic power. I have read the testimonies of many individuals who have been converted to Rome through attending the Mass. In 2009, the Catholic band Glenridge performed on the main stage at Soulfest. The members of Glenridge testify of their one-world church faith as follows: “We love being Catholic, but know that we are one body under the love of Jesus Christ no matter what Christian church you go to on Sunday” (Ibid.). Soulfest has a strong emphasis on social work and social justice, another major element in building the one-world “church.” Donald Miller, emerging church author of Blue Like Jazz, has spoken at Soulfest. (For more information about the bands and artists mentioned in this report see The Directory of Contemporary Worship Musicians, which is available in print and as a free eBook from Every preacher and Bible teacher should own and use this valuable resource.)


Published on Jun 4, 2015
Yet another outspoken Kent Hovind supporter, this time Pastor Wiley Drake, has been targeted by the United States government and IRS. Pastor Drake was one of the bold voices speaking loudly and often helping bring attention to Pastor Hovind's 10 years of persecution. Everyone please pray for Pastor Wiley Drake, for his safety, and for him to prevail over those who are trying to silence him and his ministry. (more below)

At this link you will find dozens of videos and interviews Pastor Wiley Drake has done in support of Kent Hovind

Official Kent Hovind Update Website

Additional Grassroots Hovind Support Websites

Dozens Of Free Kent Hovind Seminars/Debates – Feel Free To Make DVDs & Hand Them Out For Free Everywhere! (Please Just Don’t Sell Them Though)

Alex Jones Interviews Persecuted Creationist Kent Hovind & Mark Adams On Infowars

A Powerful Letter Of Support From The Baptist Fellowship To Kent Hovind - WOW (2015)

Thousands Of Testimonies Pour In From Around The World For Persecuted Pastor Kent Hovind!! Wow!

20 Shocking Things That Have Happened In the Kent Hovind IRS Targeting & Persecution Case Since 2004 (spread this everywhere!)

Trey Covers Kent Hovind's Persecution Beginning To Present (4-27-15) – Please Share This Everywhere!

Illegal Imprisonment of Kent Hovind & Other Christians in America | #FreeKent

Kent Hovind vs IRS Structuring | Why Kent Hovind is in Prison (3-22-15)

Creation Science Evangelist Kent Hovind Provides A Summary Of His Entire Case (5-14-15)

Judge Rodgers' Preposterous Speech Before Kent Hovind Was Sentenced To 10 Years In Prison (2006)

Urgent Message From Kent Hovind - Goverment Sends "Cyber Bomb" Computer Attacks Against Supporters

List Of More Than A Hundred Creation Ministries & Organizations Across The Country

Kent Hovind’s Old Prison Blog and Writings

Social Media (Get Involved To Help Free Kent Hovind)

Nine of Dr.Kent Hovind's Thirty-Seven E-Books Written From Prison:

Kent’s Converts Website – Write & Encourage New Christians Kent Has Led To The Lord (Kent has led almost 800 inmates to the Lord Now)

Please Contact Your Congress Representative Or Senator At This Link And Demand They Look Into This IRS Targeting/Corruption Case & Christian Persecution Of An Innocent Man Dr. Kent Hovind & Help Assist In Getting Him Released Now That All Charges Have Been Dropped!


"The first step in thwarting Representative Maloney’s move to shrink the scope of gun rights is to remember that any federal act, regulation, or order that exceeds the constitutional limits on federal power has no legal effect. States can — must — courageously refuse to enforce those acts using the historically, legally, and constitutionally sound principle of nullification."
SEE: below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

In what surely comes as no surprise to gun owners, there is a Democrat member of Congress who wants to further infringe on the right to keep and bear arms by forcing gun owners to purchase liability insurance.
As reported by The Hill, Representative Carolyn Maloney (D-N.Y.) has introduced a bill, H.R. 2546, that would “require gun buyers to have liability insurance coverage before being allowed to purchase a weapon, and would impose a fine of $10,000 if an owner is found not to have it. Service members and law enforcement officers, however, would be exempt from the requirement.”
The bill, the Firearm Risk Protection Act, carves out a significant and equally unsurprising exception to the liability insurance purchase mandate. Section 2 states that the insurance requirements “shall not apply to the purchase or sale of a firearm for the use of the United States or any department or agency of the United States.”
Given the purchase of millions of rounds by various federal agencies (including the notoriously poorly armed U.S. Postal Service), it makes sense to exclude them from the latest individual insurance mandate. Of course, exempting the federal government from the purchase requirement will undoubtedly be spun as a cost-saving measure by the establishment press and the constitutionally contrary congressmen it serves.
As for what sort of policy satisfies the proposed statutes mandate, Section 2 defines a “qualified liability insurance policy" as a policy that “provides liability insurance covering the purchaser specifically for losses resulting from use of the firearm while it is owned by the purchaser; and is issued by an insurer licensed or authorized to provide the coverage by the State insurance regulatory authority for the State in which the purchaser resides.”
“We require insurance to own a car, but no such requirement exists for guns," Maloney said, using language very similar to that used during the debates on ObamaCare. "The results are clear: car fatalities have declined by 25 percent in the last decade, but gun fatalities continue to rise,” The Hill reports.
As for Maloney, she seems never to have met an oath she wasn’t willing to break: In this case, it's the part of her constitutional oath of office regarding the preservation, protection, and defense of the Constitution. Presumably, that includes the Second Amendment, yet the Firearms Risk Protection Act was the second bill offered by Maloney this week that unconstitutionally restricts the right of Americans to keep and bear arms. The Hill reports:
A few weeks ago she reintroduced legislation that would require sellers to obtain a background check for all guns sold at gun shows. 
The Gun Show Loophole Closing Act, long championed by former Rep. Carolyn McCarthy (D-N.Y.), would subject anyone selling or transferring a gun to the National Instant Criminal Background Check System and require that transfers be reported to the attorney general. 
As readers are aware, the Second Amendment imposes on the federal government an unqualified proscription on constriction of the right to keep and bear arms. The Second Amendment reads: "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.”
The phrase that pays: shall not be infringed. That means "shall not," not "shall not unless a gun is used in a high-profile crime," or "shall not unless the president issues an executive order infringing upon it," or "shall not unless there is a risk that someone is injured.”
Despite what many “conservative” voices would have Americans believe, there is no “reasonable” exception to the “shall not be infringed” phrase. 
Our Founding Fathers understood this very well. They knew, from sad, personal experience with the oppression of tyrants, that the right to keep and bear arms was the right that protects all the other rights.
Founding-era jurist St. George Tucker wrote:
This may be considered as the true palladium of liberty.... The right of self defence [sic] is the first law of nature: in most governments it has been the study of rulers to confine this right within the narrowest limits possible. Wherever standing armies are kept up, and the right of the people to keep and bear arms is, under any colour [sic] or pretext whatsoever, prohibited, liberty, if not already annihilated, is on the brink of destruction.
In light of the nearly innumerable efforts by congressmen, the president, and the United Nations to effectively repeal the Second Amendment, there is an urgent need for states to stand up and assert their constitutional authority to resist any act of the federal government not specifically permitted in the “few and defined” powers delegated to it. States must nullify all such attempts to deny citizens of their God-given rights, including the right to keep and bear arms. 
Nullification, not capitulation, is the way to defeat the powerful forces combined against the continued enjoyment of freedom.
Nullification is the “rightful remedy” and cannot only restore the rule of law in this Republic, but can restore the independence of states and cities, freeing them from the financial chains that have them bound to the federal behemoth.
Remarkably, there are even those among the Hollywood elite who understand the purpose of the protections provided by the Second Amendment. In an interview with the U.K. edition of G.Q. magazine, Vince Vaughn expressed what is surely a controversial (though constitutionally correct) opinion on the matter. "I support people having a gun in public full stop, not just in your home. We don't have the right to bear arms because of burglars; we have the right to bear arms to resist the supreme power of a corrupt and abusive government. It's not about duck hunting; it's about the ability of the individual,” Vaughn said.
Regardless of the how widely the proper role of gun ownership spreads, the danger from Washington, D.C. remains clear and present.

Nullification recognizes the right of states to invalidate any federal measure that a state deems unconstitutional. Nullification is founded on the fact that the sovereign states formed the union, and as creators of the compact, they hold ultimate authority as to the limits of the power of the federal government to enact laws that are applicable to states and their citizens.
That our Founders understood this principle is demonstrated by Alexander Hamilton in The Federalist, No. 78:
There is no position which depends on clearer principles, than that every act of a delegated authority, contrary to the tenor of the commission under which it is exercised, is void. No legislative act, therefore, contrary to the Constitution, can be valid. To deny this, would be to affirm, that the deputy is greater than his principal; that the servant is above his master; that the representatives of the people are superior to the people themselves; that men acting by virtue of powers, may do not only what their powers do not authorize, but what they forbid.
James Madison, also writing in The Federalist, recommended that state legislators, in order to prevent federal abridgment of fundamental liberties, should refuse “to co-operate with the officers of the Union.”
Finally, founding era jurist Joseph Story described the Second Amendment’s critical check on tyranny:
The right of the citizens to keep and bear arms has justly been considered, as the palladium of the liberties of a republic; since it offers a strong moral check against the usurpation and arbitrary power of rulers; and will generally, even if these are successful in the first instance, enable the people to resist and triumph over them.
Maloney's bill is awaiting consideration by the House Judiciary Committee.
House Republicans Push Back Against Obama
The Obama Administration resumed its assault on gun owners this week, when it unveiled a so-called “Unified Agenda” containing 12 proposed anti-gun regs being planned by the Justice Department.
This prompted a Fox News discussion this week, where GOA Executive Director Larry Pratt debated an anti-gun (Bloomberg) spokesman.  You can view that debate here.
Gun Owners of America will continue to update you about what is happening with this new ground assault being leveled by the Obama administration.
But first, we wanted to alert you to the counter-offensive that House Republicans are waging against Obama’s gun control agenda.
Kudos to Reps. Buck, Gosar, Massie and others
Several Republican Representatives in the House went to bat for gun owners this week and have successfully added good amendments to a “must pass” appropriations bill.
Consider these pro-gun amendments that have been added to the Commerce-Justice-State appropriations bill (H.R. 2578):
(1) Restoration of Rights.  The House of Representatives adopted a GOA-backed amendment on Tuesday, offered by Congressman Ken Buck (R-CO), which would allow persons stripped of their constitutional Second Amendment rights to petition for a restoration of their rights.  Click here to read more.
(2) Blocking Obama ammo bans.  The adoption of three GOA-supported ammo amendments will prohibit the DOJ from banning M855 or 7N6 ammunition ban.  Click here to read more about the Hudson, Massie and Gosar amendments.
(3) Pulling the plug on Operation Choke Point.  The House adopted an important GOA-backed amendment that “defunds” the Choke Point program which the Obama Administration has used to try and squeeze gun companies out of business.  Click here to read more about the Luetkemeyer amendment.
(4) Nixing ATF racism.  Rep. Diane Black’s GOA-supported amendment to prohibit gun forms from asking about the race of the purchaser was adopted by voice vote.  Click here to read more.
(5) Punishing the Department of Justice.  Rep. Gosar successfully added several amendments to cut the budget of the DOJ and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives.  Click here to read more.
(6) Banning UN gun control, Fast & Furious, and more.  In addition to the above pro-gun amendments that were passed this week, the original CJS bill (H.R. 2578) already includes several riders pushed by GOA.  Click here to read more.
Stay tuned for additional updates, including a report on Obama’s most recent gun control offensive.
Meanwhile, please help support the work of Gun Owners of America, which is on the front lines defending your rights!

Gov't To Make Gun Owners Take
Psychological Evaluations

Obama Announces Draconian, Unconstitutional Executive Ban On Guns

Published on Jun 1, 2015
“It’s clear President Obama is beginning his final assault on our Second Amendment rights by forcing his anti-gun agenda on honest law-abiding citizens through executive force,” Luke O’Dell, the vice president of political affairs at the National Association for Gun Rights, told The Hill.