Translate

Tuesday, March 21, 2017

U.S. GOVERNMENT BREAKS LAW FOR ILLEGALS BY PERMITTING 118-340 SANCTUARY CITIES

 http://truthfeed.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/ice-sanctuary-city-list-009-01-800x416.jpg
 https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/c6/a1/6e/c6a16eeda377c3dc795a9abc4a118f29.jpg
U.S. GOVERNMENT BREAKS LAW FOR ILLEGALS BY PERMITTING 118-340 SANCTUARY CITIES OR MORE
 Published on Mar 21, 2017
Why are sanctuary cities allowed to break the law and what it means for the safety of America.

https://www.infowars.com/dhs-releases...

SECRET SERVICE AGENT WHO REFUSED TO ‘TAKE A BULLET” FOR TRUMP ON FACEBOOK, JUST GOT THE WORST NEWS OF HER CAREER

 http://patriotjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/trump-secret-service-agent.png
 http://16004-presscdn-0-50.pagely.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/kerry-ogrady-575x323.png
SECRET SERVICE AGENT WHO REFUSED TO 
‘TAKE A BULLET” FOR TRUMP ON FACEBOOK,
JUST GOT THE WORST NEWS OF HER CAREER
HATCH ACT BE DAMNED BY ALLEGED 
SEXUAL ASSAULT VICTIM; ALLOWED TO STAY 
IN THE NSA
 The Conservative Tribune reports, A top Secret Service agent who said on Facebook that she wouldn’t take a bullet for President Donald Trump has been removed from her position, the Washington Examiner reported.
 

PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP'S RALLY IN LOUISVILLE, KENTUCKY

PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP'S RALLY 
IN LOUISVILLE, KENTUCKY
CROWDS NOT SHOWN
CROWDS SHOWN

IRAN: ALARMING RISE IN ACID ATTACKS AGAINST WOMEN WHO ARE NOT PROPERLY VEILED

IRAN: ALARMING RISE IN ACID ATTACKS AGAINST WOMEN WHO ARE NOT PROPERLY VEILED
BY ROBERT SPENCER
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 Women who are not properly veiled: an outrage, a provocation. Dousing 
women with acid for being not properly veiled: pleasing to Allah. 
 
“Alarming rates of acid attacks in Iran back on the rise,” Al Arabiya, March 20, 2017:
After almost a year of calm, spraying people with burning acid has returned in Iran where a family of four has been attacked on Saturday in Sharada, within Isfahan province, Iran’s top tourist destination.
Last month, unidentified people also attacked two women in Maashour, within the Ahwaz province, according to Iranian news agencies.
Isfahan’s Investigative Police Chief Sitar Khasraoui said in press statement that the families were taken to the hospital to treat the burns. The family consists of the father, 53, the mother, 48, the son, 23, and the daughter, 20. Both parents are said to be in critical condition….
Reports on social networks have claimed that the victims were doused on the face and body because they were not properly veiled. They were targeted by assailants on motorcycles.
 

UK & EUROPEAN INTERNET SERVICE PROVIDERS NOW BLOCKING "JIHAD WATCH"~HOW YOU CAN COMBAT ONLINE CENSORSHIP

UK & EUROPEAN INTERNET SERVICE PROVIDERS 
NOW BLOCKING "JIHAD WATCH"~
HOW YOU CAN COMBAT ONLINE CENSORSHIP 
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 
This is not new. It has been ongoing for years: when fascists are unable to control the narrative, they shut down the discussion.

I am seeing now that most of the UK and many other European Internet service providers (ISPs) are blocking this as well as many other websites from being viewed.
Not content with shadow banning academics guilty of wrongspeak from social media, attempting to turn them into unpersons, they are using blocking methods originally developed but rarely used to block criminal enterprises on the web (think scammers and pedophiles) with far more alacrity than when they were ever used as originally intended.
They use a variety of methods to control what you are allowed to view online, much like how I had “guardian control” on our television to stop the kids from watching channels that were not suitable. Amusingly, I know of one home and office firewall company that is listing jihadwatch.org as “adult entertainment.” A provider in the UK, also listing Jihad Watch as adult, asks for credit card numbers to prove you are old enough to view the site.
Canada is introducing “measures,” specifically in Quebec, to block illegal gaming sites, which I would bet my last Loony on being leveraged in the same way, as soon as they criminalize “Islamophobia,” a.k.a. any criticism of jihad and the violence and crime that go hand-in-hand with Islam.
So today, some Internet providers just block this and other sites, giving the impression that site is “down,” not available, mockingly suggesting, “please try later.” We will be seeing far more of this, and there is little anyone can do to stop this from being implemented further.
The vast majority of blocks are actually very simple to bypass. They “poison” the DNS servers that they provide free with your Internet access to misdirect you to other locations. The Turkish government has been using this method for Internet access for a few years. The Chinese “protect” nearly half the world’s population from ThoughtCrime with this trick.
DNS stands for Domain Name Servers. They translate the user-entered website (domain name) such as www.jihadwatch.org into a number that is used by your computer to connect to the website — think postal/zip code. Normally, you are automatically assigned DNS Name Server addresses by your Internet service provider, but changing the DNS servers (on your local machine or router) will stop censorship using this method. 
Bypassing the simple DNS poisoning method that is most commonly used is very simple: you just change the DNS servers that Cisco, the worldwide leader in IT and networking hardware, was kind enough to provide. Try use.opendns.com or safer for sharing 208.69.38.205 (which cannot be easily blocked). In fact, in many cases, OpenDNS may be a better service than your own service provider’s DNS. It is simply tested, but whatever happens in the future, keep that link handy to check if your favorite websites really did just vanish.
Here is a complete current list of free to use public DNS serversCisco just has great instructions to make the required changes. I believe they do this intentionally to assist in bypassing government censorship.
Further, I would strongly suggest that anyone who may in the future be guilty of wrongthink or some other thoughtcrime, go one step further and encrypt all your Internet traffic using a VPN (Virtual Private Network), so that Internet providers, government agencies and even employers can not snoop. I have been involved with the development of airvpn. I have no financial motive, but I believe they are the best (speed/price), but maybe not as user-friendly as some more commercial VPNs such as Freedome. Using a VPN would be best practice to also stop cyber criminals from carrying out a number of attacks against you when you are using a public wifi (cafe, airport, etc.). It also is a more thorough way to block censorship. If you use a VPN, you do not need to change DNS servers, as the VPN does this for you.
*above, I knowingly use the term “dns poisoning” knowing that it is most commonly used to describe an attack when a bad actor diverts a website’s intended  traffic to some other location, normally to inflict some damage, but the ISPs are using similar methods that a Bad Actor would use with the intent of censorship.

THE DEEP STATE LYNCHING OF ROGER STONE

 The Deep State Lynching of Roger Stone
 Roger Stone Strikes Back Against Claims 
He Is A Russian Operative

THE DEEP STATE LYNCHING OF ROGER STONE 
 Media attacking Trump by proxy
BY JEROME CORSI
 
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 
David Brock and George Soros’s fingerprints are all over the most recent effort to destroy Roger Stone – this time by organizing a mainstream media lynching of Stone for his alleged involvement with the Russians.
What makes the lynching of Roger Stone so nefarious is that information now being disseminated by the Brock-Soros attack machine to their media co-conspirators could only have been obtained by extensive electronic surveillance conducted surreptitiously and most likely without proper judicial authorization by Deep State enemies of the Trump administration still buried deep within the NSA and CIA.
The Smoking Gun, in attacking Stone, published detailed information about the FBI’s investigation of Guccifer 2.0 could only have come from Deep State sources within the FBI and the U.S. intelligence agencies, including NSA and CIA.

Brock’s determination to destroy Stone began early last year, when Brock realized Stone could be effective in advancing Donald Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign.
In the sixth video of James O’Keefe’s Project Veritas Action, Bradley Beychock, then president of David Brock’s Media Matters, bragged, “Our big role with Trump as a media watchdog is to take his MVPs [Most Valuable Players] and put them on the sidelines.  So the first one is Roger Stone.”
Beychock on the O’Keefe video can be heard bragging about the campaign Media Matters ran to smear Stone.
“We led the campaign to track every book appearance [that Stone did],” Beychock insisted. “We took everything that was crazy in his book and made sure people knew it was sourced in crazy material, we parsed out his tweets by ethnicity group – whether the attack was on minorities, or LGBT folks, or on immigrants.”
Media Matters goal was to get Stone blacklisted by the major cable news channels.
“We published that with the networks – reached out privately to each network and said, ‘Hey, are you aware you have had this guy on 12 times in the last four months and he said these three things about your anchors or the people you have on the air, or work for your organization,” Beychock went on cheerfully, as if relishing in a recent successful hit job.
“Ultimately, we got Stone banned from Fox, MSNBC, and CNN, and he hasn’t been on in four months. So, like we try to take the MVPs off the sidelines.”
In a briefing book entitled “Transforming the Media Landscape” (obtained by the Free Beacon) that Brock published privately in January to solicit donors, Media Matters resumed the attack against Stone.
In the briefing book for donors, Brock bragged that Media Matters “succeeded in pressuring CNN, MSNBC, and even Fox News to stop booking Roger Stone, a regular guest and a longtime Trump ally.”
Brock proceeded to smear Stone, charging that Stone “has a decades-long history of employing political dirty tricks and regularly spouting violent, racist, and sexist rhetoric.”
But, undeterred, Stone in January published his best-seller, The Making of the President 2016: How Donald Trump Orchestrated a Revolution – a book that currently has 100,000 copies in print, with Stone doing a bi-coastal media tour.
Some will remember that back in December, Stone’s doctor found the politico had been mysterious poisoned with a very small dosage of radioactive material, most likely polonium.
Racked with fever and hospitalized, Stone suffered through projectile vomiting, violent diarrhea, night sweats, delirium dehydration, and a rash that took the veteran Republican nearly a month to recover.
Those who tried to kill (or warn) Stone failed.
Having failed in all these efforts to sideline Stone, the next tactic of the Deep State was to arrange a mainstream media mass lynching, re-inventing in hard-left New Age fashion the horrid Ku Klux Klan terror technique of radical Democrats in the post-Civil War, Reconstruction Era South.
The goal of the Brock-Stone media-manipulation team was to sideline Stone permanently, to remove him from being of assistance to President Trump in the battles ahead.
The problem facing the Deep State was that Stone’s only exchange with the hacker was a perfunctory exchange that took place ex post facto, almost five weeks after the DNC documents hacked by Guccifer 2.0 had already released.
But the Brock-Soros propaganda machine was not deterred that no hard evidence had been produced to support the Democratic Party narrative that Hillary lost the election because Roger Trump schemed with Russia to intervene in the U.S. presidential election.
The lynching of Roger Stone began on March 8, when the Smoking Gun reported that Stone had been in touch with “Guccifer 2.0” prior to the November election.
The Smoking Gun presented this without acknowledging that Stone himself first brought out the contact with Guccifer 2.0 in an article Stone authored in Breitbart.com on Aug. 5, 2016.
In that article, entitled “Dear Hillary: DNC Hack Solved, So Stop Blaming Russia,” Stone pointed out that Guccifer 2.0 explained he was responsible both for hacking Hillary’s home server and subsequently for his hacking of the DNC, in which Guccifer 2.0 hacked John Podesta’s emails.
Still, the Smoking Gun insisted on reporting this as if it were uncovering some great secret.
This is the Smoking Gun first paragraph:
In the months before Election Day, a longtime confidante and political consultant for Donald Trump was in contact with the Russian hacking group that U.S. intelligence officials have accused of illegally breaching the Democratic National Committee’s computer system and the e-mail accounts of Hillary Clinton campaign officials in a bid to aid Trump, The Smoking Gun has learned.
And the Smoking Gun second paragraph:
The contact between Roger Stone, the Trump associate, and the Russian influence operation came via private messages exchanged on Twitter, according to a source. Stone’s contact was with “Guccifer 2.0,” an online persona that U.S. officials say was created by Russian government officials to distribute and publicize material stolen during hacks of the DNC, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, and Gmail accounts used by Clinton staffers like John Podesta, the campaign’s chairman.
What followed the Smoking Gun article published on March 8 was a mainstream media feeding frenzy attacking Stone.
The intensity with which the mainstream media repeated the Smoking Gun story resembled the frenzy with which a Ku Klux Klan posse organized in the Reconstruction Era South to string up some innocent African-American from a tree without so much as an indictment, let alone a trial.
Look at the number of publications that piled on Stone, parroting what the Smoking Gun had published, adding their own inflammatory headlines and damning prose.
  • On Friday, Salon.com published the story under the headline, “Roger Stone doesn’t ‘like Russian dressing,’ says his chat with Guccifer was innocuous.”
  • On Friday, the Hill headline read, “Trump adviser admits to contact with DNC hacker.”
  • On Friday, GQ reported, “Former Trump Advisor Roger Stone Was in Contact with a Russian Hacker During the Election.”
  • On Saturday, Talking Points Memo, TPM News, ran the headline, “Ex-Trump Adviser Roger Stone Was in Contact with DNC Hacking Suspect.”
  • On Saturday, the Chicago Tribune ran with, “Ex-Trump adviser Roger Stone swapped messages with DNC hacking suspect.
  • On Saturday, Raw Story reported “Roger Stone admits having contact with alleged DNC hacker.”
  • On Sunday, CNN went with the headline, “Trump associate plays down Twitter contact with Guccifer 2.0.”
  • On Monday, CBS News ran, “Roger Stone on why ‘exchange’ with DNC hacking suspect Guccifer 2.0 was ‘innocuous.’”
The mainstream media largely ignored Stone’s protest on his website that the timeline proves the “Russian Collusion” meme was a lie.
“The Smoking Gun website has come up with a sensational but bogus claim that I collaborated with a hacker, Guccifer 2.0 to hack data from the DNC and have WikiLeaks release it,” Stone wrote on StoneColdTruth.com.  “This is another absurd media claim that is part of the long-standing absurd claim that Donald Trump had anything to do with the Russians. This is a charge without a shred of evidence.”
Next Stone explained how the timeline should have made the “Russian collusion” narrative a lie, had any reporters replaying the Smoking Gun sensationalism bothered to check.
“All contact I had with the entity known as Guccifer 2.0 came after I had written an article that was published on August 5th, by Breitbart News and vetted by their lead investigative reporter Lee Stranahan,” Stone explained. “That article came after the DNC and DCCC material had been released and identified the role of a hacker going by the moniker Guccifer 2 based on our own sources.” [Bold and italics in original]
Stone’s conclusion was obvious: “Therefore, any such ‘collaboration’ would’ve also involved a time machine – something that I think Putin has not perfected yet.”
What Dinesh D’Sousa clearly proved in his most recent documentary film and bestselling book, Hillary’s America: The Secret of the Democratic Party, was that when the Reconstruction Era Ku Klux Klan took off their hoods, they proved to be Southern Democrats.
Psychiatrists understanding the psychological phenomenon of “projection” and generations of high school students assigned to read Harper Lee’s 1960 classic novel, To Kill a Mockingbird should understand the Ku Klux Klansmen lynching innocent African Americans accused of violating virginal white women may have been driven by the lust they felt in their own hearts for these same young maidens.
So too, the abundant evidence is that it was the Democrats in the 2016 election who were colluding with Russia, not the Republicans
Totally ignored in the media lynching of Roger Stone is a press release the Trump-Pence campaign released on Oct. 9, 2016, entitled “Clinton’s Close Ties to Putin Deserve Scrutiny.”
But Brock-Soros and their media vigilantes are determined to ignore the abundant evidence that Putin was paying both Hillary Clinton, through Russian bank transfers to the Clinton Foundation, and her campaign manager John Podesta, through a shell company set up in the Netherlands as part of a Russian money-laundering scheme disclosed in the Panama Papers revelations.
Without proof, David Brock, the ideological switch-hitter, and George Soros, the Nazi war collaborator and currency manipulator, will certainly fail in their attempt to destroy Roger Stone by disseminating disinformation provided to them by Deep State Trump-haters.
But once the Brock-Soros attempt failed to blame Stone and Russia for Hillary’s catastrophic loss on Election Day 2016, who will they blame next for losing the 2016 presidential election?
Surely, not themselves.

 

CULTIC, LEFT WING, NEW AGE, MYSTIC OPRAH WINFREY EYES POSSIBLE PRESIDENTIAL BID IN 2020


oprah-winfrey-with-president-obama-and-michelle-obama

LOOK WHO OPRAH WILL HAVE IN THE WHITE HOUSE IF SHE GETS ELECTED IN 2020:

  http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Tgd3lCtAstU/0.jpg

ABOVE: OPRAH WITH HERETIC "FEEL GOOD GOSPEL" PREACHER JOEL OSTEEN 

BELOW: OPRAH WITH BIBLE TWISTING HERETIC ROB BELL:

 http://www.atacrossroads.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/rob-bell-oprah-winfrey-super-soul-sunday-bible-heresy.png

 BELOW: OPRAH WITH NEW AGE MYSTIC ECKHART TOLLE

 http://www.originmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/Screen-Shot-2014-02-25-at-4.04.12-PM.png

Oprah says, "I Surrender All," but it's NOT to Jesus Christ

Left-wing Oprah Eyes Possible Presidential Bid in 2020 

BY STEVE BYAS

SEE: https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/item/25626-left-wing-oprah-eyes-possible-presidential-bid-in-2020; 

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 
Buoyed by a recently released poll by Public Policy Polling which showed her leading President Donald Trump 47-40 in a hypothetical 2020 match-up, daytime talk show “queen” Oprah Winfrey (shown) is said to be toying with the idea of making a bid for the White House.
Of course, Trump trailed Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton throughout most of the 2016 campaign, by as much as 15 points in some polls, so polling almost four years in advance of an election is often dismissed as meaningless. After all, if polling that far in advance was conclusive, then we would have had presidents Dewey, Muskie, and Dukakis instead of Truman, Nixon, and George H.W. Bush.
But, considering that few gave Trump much of a shot, even when he was performing well in polls early in the Republican nomination battle in late 2015 and early 2016, we should not dismiss a run by such a well-known media personality as Winfrey. Trump had achieved high name recognition as the host of the popular TV show “The Apprentice,” and Winfrey, if anything, enjoyed even higher name I.D. from her TV fame.
“Given the popularity you have, and that we haven’t broken the glass ceiling yet for women, you could actually run for president and you could be elected,” talk show host David Rubinstein told Winfrey, urging her to consider the idea.

Trump’s path to the White House as a celebrity is seen by some such as Rubinstein as an indication that the voters are now looking at style over substance; however, while Trump had a greater name I.D. than most of his Republican rivals, his positions on issues were just as critical to his success. He tackled such subjects as disastrous international trade deals and the tsunami of illegal immigration that the other candidates generally avoided, demonstrating an ability to connect with voters.
Though Winfrey is undoubtedly noted for her ability to “connect” with her many fans, whether that talent will translate into political success remains to be seen.
Left-wing CNN commentator Van Jones, who has a communist background,  boldly predicted that Winfrey would not only defeat Trump, but that she would beat him a historic landslide. Speaking on Bravo’s late-night show Watch What Happens Next, Jones argued, “It takes a superstar to beat a superstar. And I think if Oprah Winfrey ran, she’d win all 50 states.”
Jones also mentioned Democrats Senator Kamala Harris (Calif.), Senator Corey Booker (N.J.), and Congressman Joe Kennedy III (Mass.). All three, of course, are conventional politicians, and Trump showed that celebrities can surprise such professionals.
Winfrey has already demonstrated that she has political clout — at least within the more liberal base of the Democratic Party. It was her support of fellow Chicagoan U.S. Senator Barack Obama in 2007 that is seen as giving him the extra credibility he needed to upset Hillary Clinton to win the 2008 Democratic Party nomination.
Her open endorsement of Obama was the first time that Winfrey had publicly backed a political candidate. She held a fundraiser for him in September 2007 at her estate, and then three months later she joined Obama for a series of rallies in the early primary states of Iowa, New Hampshire, and South Carolina. Some have estimated that she could have swung more than one and a half million votes for Obama, providing the difference in his eventual victory.
What had given her such exceptional pull with voters, especially among those who cast votes in the Democratic primaries? Certainly it was the trust her many fans placed in her, especially women who were given the unofficial go-ahead to abandon the female hopeful, Hillary Clinton. This emotional bond was built over several years because of Oprah's highly popular daytime talk show.
How did Winfrey rise from poverty to become the wealthiest black woman in American history? She apparently possessed an ability to talk and connect with an audience as early as high school, when she had a job in radio; at age 19 she co-anchored the local evening news. Of course, her entry into television was helped immensely when she won the Miss Black Tennessee beauty pageant at age 17.
Her unusual name of “Oprah” was certainly another factor in her success. Named “Orpah” on her birth certificate, after the biblical character, that name proved difficult for others to pronounce, and she eventually became known as Oprah. In the Bible, Orpah was the daughter-in-law of the Israelite Naomi who returned to her Moabite gods when Naomi’s other daughter-in-law, Ruth, chose to instead accept the God of Israel. (Ruth was an ancestor of King David, and eventually, of course, of Jesus Christ).
Raised a Baptist, the young Oprah was taken to church by her grandmother, where Oprah was dubbed “The Preacher” for her ability to quote Bible verses. But Winfrey has certainly abandoned the adherence to the Scriptures her grandmother and the Baptists attempted to instill in her. She rejected the more conservative Baptist faith when she heard a minister say, “The Lord thy God is a jealous God.” Oprah said at the moment the preacher said the word “jealous,” there was “something about that [that] didn’t feel right in my spirit because I believe that God is love and God is in all things.”
The belief that God is “in all things” is better known as pantheism. Indeed, Winfrey has often advocated the views of New Age spiritualist Eckhart Tolle on the web and in her TV shows. "I took God out of the box,” she says of her efforts. “One of the mistakes that human beings make is believing that there is only one way to live. There are many paths to what you call God.” (Emphasis added). At another time, she indicated that her concept of God is not orthodox, asserting, “God is a feeling experience and not a believing experience. If your religion is a believing experience ... then that’s not truly God.”
She has also even been quoted as saying, “I have a church with myself: I have church walking down the street. I believe in [a] God force that lives inside all of us, and once you tap into that, you can do anything.” This sounds more like a line from the Star Wars movies than something found in a Christian church.
Soon after the September 11 attacks, Winfrey came to the defense of Islam in a program she called “Islam 101,” calling it a peaceful religion and arguing that it was “the most misunderstood of the three major religions.”
Her religious views may not damage her political chances within the more liberal base Democratic Party; however, it is uncertain whether such theology would be acceptable to a general election audience.
Sociologist Vicki Abt criticized Winfrey in her book Coming After Oprah: Cultural Fallout in the Age of the TV Talk Show. Abt charged that Winfrey’s show was critical in blurring the lines between “normal” and “deviant” behavior. Of course, supporters, on the other hand, credit her for making the LGBT movement, for instance, mainstream and more socially acceptable.  
Besides Oprah's social views, her political opinions are certainly not conservative, either. In 2009, she traveled to Denmark to praise its socialist system. According to Winfrey, the Danes are the happiest people on earth, who particularly enjoy living in very small houses. (Apparently Winfrey likes a bigger house than these “happy” Danes.)
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) honored her as the 2008 Person of the Year for her work in uncovering mistreatment of animals and her advocacy of a vegan diet. She also refused to wear fur or even allow it to be shown in her magazine, “O.”
It is uncertain, of course, whether Winfrey will actually make a presidential bid. She would be 67 years old in 2020 — still younger than either Trump or Clinton was in the last election (and though it didn't seem to matter to the 70-year-old Trump, Clinton’s health definitely was a matter of some discussion).
But if she were to run, when one considers the present state of the American electorate, she would have to be taken seriously.
______________________________________________________
SEE OUR PREVIOUS POSTS:
http://ratherexposethem.blogspot.com/2016/10/td-jakes-joins-oprah-winfrey-in-selling.html 
http://ratherexposethem.blogspot.com/2014/12/equally-yoked-rob-bell-oprah-winfrey.html 
EXCERPT:

Two weekends ago, former evangelical pastor Rob Bell and former television icon Oprah wrapped up their national 8-city “Oprah’s The Life You Want Weekend” New Age tour. Joining Bell and Oprah on the tour were other two New Age sympathizers –  Deepak Chopra and Elizabeth Gilbert (Eat, Pray, Love). There was a time, not too many years ago, when Bell’s best-selling book Velvet Elvis was being read by millions of young evangelicals, and the book was touted by Christian leaders and college professors. It was a disaster in discernment in the church as even back then Bell was promoting the New Age. In a 2007 article, a Lighthouse Trails stated, “Velvet Elvis and Bell’s Noomas are a trojan horse that will deliver to young unsuspecting kids from Christian homes a hearty helping of the New Age (i.e., mysticism and panentheism). And if they are introduced to the New Age under the guise of Christian literature, many of them will be seduced by ‘doctrines of devils.'”
Bell, who stepped down from the evangelical pastorate in 2011, has finally openly shown his true New Age colors by yoking himself with Oprah Winfrey, the most influential New Ager in the world today.
 http://christiannews.net/2014/12/03/controversial-author-rob-bell-who-questioned-hell-turns-self-help-guru-on-oprah-winfrey-network/;
EXCERPT:
“Plain and simple, Rob Bell’s teachings are not true to the words of Scripture,” Eric Ludy, pastor of Church at Ellerslie and president of Ellerslie Mission Society in Windsor, Colorado told Christian News Network. “They are a sly attempt at blending the philosophies of our post-modern age with the vernacular of pop-Christianity. The end product is highly dangerous to the human soul because it is the forging of a golden calf god—a God of our culture’s making—and certainly not the God of the Bible.”
SEE ALSO: 
___________________________________________________
OPRAH'S "MORE THAN ONE WAY TO GOD"
 Terrifying - Oprah Winfrey Readies 
2020 Presidential Run 
PLANNING GLOBAL MEDICAL TYRANNY
ALEX JONES EXPOSES OPRAH'S DARK AGENDA; ANNUAL MEETINGS WITH GLOBALISTS 
ROCKEFELLER & BILL GATES 


OPRAH HAS A SUDDEN REVELATION ABOUT 
BEING PRESIDENT

MAN INVOLVED IN WHITE HOUSE BOMB SCARE: "THIS IS A TEST"

MAN INVOLVED IN WHITE HOUSE BOMB SCARE: 
"THIS IS A TEST" 
 Numerous security incidents in recent weeks 
stoke fears of Trump assassination plot
BY PAUL JOSEPH WATSON
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 
A man arrested near the White House after he falsely told Secret Service agents he had a bomb in his vehicle also said, “this is a test,” stoking concerns after several other security incidents in recent weeks.
Sean Patrick Keoughan of Roanoke, Virginia was arrested after he pulled up to a security checkpoint at 15th Street and East Street NW near the White House at 11pm on Saturday night in a stolen 2017 Chevrolet Impala.
According to police, Keoughan told Secret Service, “There’s a bomb in the trunk,” while holding an object in his hand. As he was being arrested, Keoughan added, “This is a test.”

A robot was dispatched to investigate the car but nothing was found. Keoughan was subsequently charged with making false bomb threats and unauthorized use of a vehicle.
Earlier in the day there was another security scare after a man breached the buffer zone around the White House “in an apparent attempt to get to the White House fence,” although he was not able to jump the fence.
Earlier this month, Jonathan Tran did manage to make it past the fence before walking around White House grounds for 17 minutes before being spotted. He was able to get close to a White House entrance before being apprehended. Tran was reportedly concerned about Russian ties to Trump and was attempting to deliver a message to the president.
In a related story, the Secret Service announced that it would permanently remove a top special agent from her position after she posted on Facebook that she would not take a bullet for Trump.
Given the innumerable death threats against Trump, including a purported assassination attempt last year, the numerous security scares around the White House, along with Keoughan’s admission that his intention was to carry out a “test,” if there was a serious plan to assassinate the president, its plotters can only be learning from these incidents.
The hysteria being generated by the mainstream media in response to Trump simply moving forward with the policy agenda he promised during his campaign will undoubtedly embolden disturbed individuals to believe they have the moral high ground, especially in light of the fact that numerous celebrities and journalists have also called for Trump to be killed.

GLOBALISTS FREAK OUT OVER TRUMP'S PROPOSED U.N. CUTS

 http://www3.pictures.zimbio.com/gi/John+Kerry+Federica+Mogherini+kvp8bP-x2Qzm.jpg
 THE VERY INTIMATE GLOBALIST ASSOCIATION OF JOHN KERRY & FREDERICA MOGHERINI
 http://www.euractiv.fr/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2014/12/15751908080-5d250c0568-z.jpeg
 http://images.prensa.com/fotogalerias/EU-Mogherini-Union-Exteriores-Seguridad_LPRIMA20160504_0187_34.jpg
GLOBALISTS FREAK OUT OVER TRUMP'S 
PROPOSED U.N. CUTS 
 Elites fear Trump will destroy globalist UN
BY CLIFFORD CUNNINGHAM
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 
President Donald Trump’s proposed cuts to the United Nations will “completely destabilize” the world, a senior EU official claims.
The EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, Frederica Mogherini, freaked out over Trump’s budget proposal, which calls on the State Department to reduce America’s contributions to the United Nations by 50%.
“If the United States were to reduce significantly its investment, be it on humanitarian development aid, peace and security operations, the world and certain regions of the world would get completely destabilized,” she said on Monday.

Mogherini was in Washington, D.C. to provide opening keynote remarks for the 2017 Carnegie International Nuclear Policy Conference, sponsored by the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
Trump’s proposed cuts to America’s funding for the UN have drawn fierce criticism from the global elite and globalist-connected publications.
Foreign Policy, owned by the same holding company as the Washington Post, said Trump’s proposed cuts constituted “an unprecedented retreat by [the] administration from international operations that keep the peace, provide vaccines for children, monitor rogue nuclear weapons programs, and promote peace talks from Syria to Yemen.”
Richard Gowan, an expert on the UN for the globalist European Council on Foreign Relations, said the proposed budget cuts would create “chaos.”
Stewart Patrick, senior fellow and director of the appropriately-named program on International Institutions and Global Governance at the Council on Foreign Relations, expressed fear that the “unapologetic nationalist” Donald Trump would bring about the collapse of the UN.
“Among the many foreign policy uncertainties created by Donald Trump’s election, there is one prediction we can take to the bank: The United Nations is going to get hammered,” he wrote.
While President Obama once proclaimed himself a “citizen of the world,” Trump was elected after rallying a “populist base deeply skeptical of international organizations,” Patrick claimed.

NSA DOCUMENTS PROVE SURVEILLANCE OF DONALD TRUMP & HIS FAMILY FOR EIGHT YEARS

NSA DOCUMENTS PROVE SURVEILLANCE 
OF DONALD TRUMP & HIS FAMILY
 Bombshell discovery shows targets of 
NSA's "Project Dragnet"
BY JEROME CORSI
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 
UPDATE: Bombshell – Obama Illegally Spied on Sheriff Arpaio’s Prosecution
WASHINGTON, D.C. – Infowars.com have obtained credible information from law enforcement sources regarding individual records of U.S. citizens under National Security Agency (NSA) electronic surveillance in the years 2004 through 2010 – a database that suggests both Donald J. Trump and Alex Jones were under illegal, unauthorized government monitoring during those years.
LIVE COVERAGE OF NSA SPYING ON TRUMP

Michael Zullo, formerly the commander and chief investigator of the Cold Case Posse (CCP), a special investigative group created in 2006 in the office of Joseph M. Arpaio, formerly the sheriff in Maricopa County, an Arizona State Certified Law Enforcement Agency, headquartered in Phoenix, Arizona, provided sections of the database to Infowars.com.
The electronic surveillance database, provided to Zullo by a whistleblower in 2013, was apparently created by the NSA as part of the NSA’s illegal and unconstitutional Project Dragnet electronic surveillance of U.S. citizens, first revealed by news reports published in 2005, as further documented by the revelations of whistleblower Edward Snowden in 2013.
Sheriff Arpaio and Chief Investigator Zullo have identified dozens of entries at various addresses, including both Trump Tower in New York City and Mar-a-Lago in Palm Beach, Florida, under which Donald Trump was apparently under NSA electronic surveillance from 2004, during President George W. Bush’s term of office, through 2009, the first year of President Obama’s presidency.

Electronic surveillance of Donald Trump was listed in the database for the following companies, locations, and dates:
Trump International
1 Central Park, NYC, NY
2008
Trump World Tower
845 United Nations Plaza, NYC, NY
No Date
Trump Tower SAL
108 Central Park, NYC, NY
2007
Trump Palace Co
200 E. 69th Street A, NYC, NY
2008
Trump Entertainment
725 Fifth Ave. FL, NYC, NY
2007
Trump Organization
725 Fifth Ave. BSM, NYC, NY
2009
Trump Palace
725 Fifth Ave., NYC, NY
2004
Mar-a-Lago Club
1100 S. Ocean BL, Palm Beach, FL
2006
Trump International
401 N. Wabash Ave., Chicago, IL
2008
Douglass Limousine
239 Nassau St., Princeton, NJ
2008
Trump International
3505 Summit BLV, West Palm Beach, FL
2004
Flights INC
P.O. Box 196, Hamilton MA
2004
Trump International
1 Central Park, NYC, NY
2008
Trump Hotels
Huron Ave., Atlantic City, NJ
No Date
Trump National
339 Pine Rd, Briarcliff, NY
No Date
Trump Plaza & C
2500 Pacific Ave, Atlantic City, NJ
2008
Trump Palace Co.
200 E. 69th St., NYC, NY
2008
Seven Springs
66 Oregon Rd, Mount Kisco, NY
2006-2008
While attempts have been made to deny such domestic surveillance, reports from the New York Times in 2014 showed the Central Intelligence Agency had done just that by spying on a senate panel investigating the agency’s use of “enhanced interrogation.”
 
In a 2016 article from The Guardian entitled, “‘A constitutional crisis’: the CIA turns on the Senate,” it is likewise noted just how drastic and widespread the CIA’s domestic surveillance operation was.

As revealed from the Dragnet database, not only was Trump himself surveilled but so were numerous employees of his located at Trump Tower.
Former CIA officer Larry Johnson recently joined the Alex Jones show to discuss how intelligence sources have stated that such surveillance of Trump during the presidential election in fact took place.
Here is a partial list of the Trump employees that show up in the Project Dragnet database:
• Patricia Hernandez, a Manager for the Trump Organization, was under NSA electronic surveillance at Trump Parc, Central Park South, in New York City, at phone 212-586-xxxx, date: 9/16/2008.
• Mike van der Goes, a Golf Pro at Oceans Trails Golf Course in Palos Verdes, who was promoted to be general manager when Trump bought the course from the bank in 2005 and renamed it Trump National. Mike van der Goes was under surveillance at Trump National, 1 Ocean TRL, Rancho Palos Verdes, California, at phone: 310-265-xxxx, no date.
• Carolyn Kepcher, a frequent guest on NBC’s television program “The Apprentice,” who was under NSA electronic surveillance when she was General Manager at the Trump National Golf Course in Briarcliff, New York, in Westchester County north of New York City, at 339 Pine Rd., in Briarcliff, New York, at phone 914-944-xxxx, date: 9/7/206.
• Joe Traci, a Real Estate Property Manager at Trump New World Property Management, at 438 W. 69th Street, New York City, phone 212-769-xxxx, date: 11/12/2008; and at 5 12th Street, New York City, phone: 212-586-xxxx, no date.
• Roger Socio, a Senior Project Manager, Trump Organization, Trump Tower, 725 Fifth Avenue, New York City, phone: 212-715-xxxx, 2/23/2009.
• Bill Fichter, Residents Manager, Trump Organization, Trump Palace, 200 E. 69th Street, New York City, phone: 212-879-xxxx, date: 2/24/2009.
• Florin Bogosel, Trump Park Avenue, 502 Park Avenue, New York City, phone: 212-223-xxxx, no date.
• Grace Dunne, Trump Park Residence, 3770 Barger Street, Shrub Oak, New York, phone: 914-245-xxxx, date 1/26/2006.
• Greg Bradley, Vice President, Trump Pavilion for Nursing and Rehabilitation, 9028 Van Wyck, East Richmond Hill, New York, phone: 718-291-xxxx, no date.
All these employees appear to have been under NSA phone surveillance, plus various of them under financial surveillance as well.
The Project Dragnet database suggests Trump was under surveillance not only for phone conversations, but also for financial information, including most likely bank account transactions, credit card transactions, and tax filings.
Both federal and state law enforcement have had access to the Project Dragnet database, allowing widespread use for methods such as parallel construction. The practice, outlined in the 2013 Reuters article, “U.S. directs agents to cover up program used to investigate Americans,” reveals the breadth of information that trickles down to law enforcement from high-level intelligence agencies.

Also listed as under NSA surveillance in the period 2004-2010 was Trump’s former wife, Ivanka Trump at House of Ivanka, 10 East 64th Street, New York City.
The Project Dragnet database also indicates that the NSA was conducting electronic surveillance on an extensive list of Trump employees in the years 2004-2010 – the only years for which Sheriff Arpaio had data.
Alex Jones is listed as being under electronic surveillance for phone records, as well as under surveillance for financial records, in 2006. The address listed for Alex Jones in the NSA Project Dragnet database was correct for his residence at that time. So too, Alex Jones confirmed the phone number listed was also correct.
Sheriff Arpaio and Chief Investigator Zullo have validated through law enforcement channels the validity of the name, address, and telephone numbers for the dates that appear in the Project Dragnet database.
Sheriff Arpaio and Chief Investigator Zullo are prepared to share relevant information with appropriate federal law enforcement agencies, including the FBI, as well as the Department of Justice, Homeland Security Department, the White House, and members of Congress the Project Dragnet Database in whole, or in part, as it pertains to NSA electronic surveillance of Donald J. Trump and his various employee.
Sheriff Arpaio and Chief Investigator Zullo also show up in the database, listed as being under both phone and financial surveillance.
Zullo explained that he and Arpaio came in contact with the information from Operation Dragnet during an unrelated investigation that began in October 2013 and ended January 2015.
A whistleblower by the name of Dennis Montgomery brought forward information that Montgomery alleges was collected while he was employed as a subcontractor for the NSA, working on various surveillance projects.
Court documents do verify Montgomery was contracted by the NSA, in part to develop computer breaching software that has been utilized in government mass surveillance operations targeting American citizens without legal justification.
While Montgomery’s credibility has been called into question, Zullo maintains that the amount of information provided by Montgomery related to Operation Dragnet was extraordinarily voluminous and that Montgomery had shared information with investigators in 2013 that is only now being revealed by media outlets.
________________________________________________________
 BREAKING! Documents Show Obama Surveiled Entire Trump Family For 8 Years

Project Dragnet gave countless government employees private data on Trump

SEE: https://www.infowars.com/breaking-documents-show-obama-surveiled-entire-trump-family-for-8-years/; 

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 
Alex Jones breaks down information provided exclusively to Infowars from law enforcement sources that shows NSA surveillance of Donald Trump, his family, his employees and countless others under “Project Dragnet.”
READ: NSA Documents Prove Surveillance of Donald Trump & His Family
EXCLUSIVE! New NSA Whistleblower Goes Public About Trump Surveillance