Friday, November 2, 2018


republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
In this interview with Sputnik News, Jihad Watch writer Christine Douglass-Williams exposes a great deal about the systematic and institutionalized abuse of women under Islamic law. Indeed, the second-class status of women is ingrained in Sharia, and set out in numerous passages of the Qur’an and Hadith.
The Qur’an teaches that men are superior to women and should beat those from whom they “fear disobedience”: “Men have authority over women because Allah has made the one superior to the other, and because they spend their wealth to maintain them. Good women are obedient. They guard their unseen parts because Allah has guarded them. As for those from whom you fear disobedience, admonish them and send them to beds apart and beat them.” — Qur’an 4:34
Muhammad’s child bride, Aisha, says in a hadith that Muhammad “struck me on the chest which caused me pain, and then said: ‘Did you think that Allah and His Apostle would deal unjustly with you?’” — Sahih Muslim 2127
The Qur’an likens a woman to a field (tilth), to be used by a man as he wills: “Your women are a tilth for you, so go to your tilth as you will” — Qur’an 2:223
It declares that a woman’s testimony is worth half that of a man: “Get two witnesses, out of your own men, and if there are not two men, then a man and two women, such as you choose, for witnesses, so that if one of them errs, the other can remind her” — Qur’an 2:282
It allows men to marry up to four wives, and have sex with slave girls also: “If you fear that you shall not be able to deal justly with the orphans, marry women of your choice, two or three or four; but if you fear that ye shall not be able to deal justly, then only one, or one that your right hands possess, that will be more suitable, to prevent you from doing injustice” — Qur’an 4:3
It rules that a son’s inheritance should be twice the size of that of a daughter: “Allah directs you as regards your children’s inheritance: to the male, a portion equal to that of two females” — Qur’an 4:11
It allows for marriage to pre-pubescent girls, stipulating that Islamic divorce procedures “shall apply to those who have not yet menstruated” — Qur’an 65:4
Islamic law stipulates that a man’s prayer is annulled if a dog or a woman passes in front of him as he is praying. “Narrated ‘Aisha: The things which annul the prayers were mentioned before me. They said, “Prayer is annulled by a dog, a donkey and a woman (if they pass in front of the praying people).” I said, ‘You have made us (i.e. women) dogs.’ I saw the Prophet praying while I used to lie in my bed between him and the Qibla. Whenever I was in need of something, I would slip away. for I disliked to face him.” — Sahih Bukhari 1.9.490
Another hadith depicts Muhammad saying that the majority of the inhabitants of hell are women:
“I looked into Paradise and I saw that the majority of its people were the poor. And I looked into Hell and I saw that the majority of its people are women.” — Sahih Bukhari 3241; Sahih Muslim 2737
When asked about this, he explained:
“I was shown Hell and I have never seen anything more terrifying than it. And I saw that the majority of its people are women.” They said, “Why, O Messenger of Allah?” He said, “Because of their ingratitude (kufr).” It was said, “Are they ungrateful to Allah?” He said, “They are ungrateful to their companions (husbands) and ungrateful for good treatment. If you are kind to one of them for a lifetime then she sees one (undesirable) thing in you, she will say, ‘I have never had anything good from you.’” — Sahih Bukhari 1052
And in another hadith:
The Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) went out to the musalla (prayer place) on the day of Eid al-Adha or Eid al-Fitr. He passed by the women and said, ‘O women! Give charity, for I have seen that you form the majority of the people of Hell.’ They asked, ‘Why is that, O Messenger of Allah?’ He replied, ‘You curse frequently and are ungrateful to your husbands. I have not seen anyone more deficient in intelligence and religious commitment than you. A cautious sensible man could be led astray by some of you.’ The women asked, ‘O Messenger of Allah, what is deficient in our intelligence and religious commitment?’ He said, ‘Is not the testimony of two women equal to the testimony of one man?’ They said, ‘Yes.’ He said, ‘This is the deficiency in her intelligence. Is it not true that a woman can neither pray nor fast during her menses?’ The women said, ‘Yes.’ He said, ‘This is the deficiency in her religious commitment.’” — Sahih Bukhari 304
Another statement attributed to Muhammad: “If a husband calls his wife to his bed [i.e. to have sexual relation] and she refuses and causes him to sleep in anger, the angels will curse her till morning.” — Sahih Bukhari 4.54.460

“Human Rights Activist Explains Why Protecting Burqa Rights is Dangerous,” Sputnik News, October 26, 2018:
The UN Human Rights Committee has demanded that France review its law banning the burqa, claiming that it violates human rights. Christine Douglass Williams, a human rights activist and former director of the Canadian Race Relations Foundation, explained to Sputnik why such demands pose a danger.
Christine Williams said in an interview with Sputnik that the UN is exceeding its mandate with demands that France’s burqa ban be lifted. According to her, such laws have been adopted by over a dozen states, not only Western ones, out of security concerns. She added that these countries have the right to ignore the UN ruling if the ban is a matter of national security.
Williams also recalled that the burqa issue is of crucial concern to the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), which withdrew from the UN Declaration of Human Rights in 1990, creating its own human rights declaration based on Sharia. She believes that the UN is playing into the OIC’s hands by trying to repeal the burqa ban in France.
“The OIC has made no secret of its interests to impose its Shariah imperatives globally, which includes the inferiority of women who must be covered in accordance with Quran 24:31 and 33:59. Five years ago, under Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, the UNSC openly encouraged the active contribution of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation, so it is apparent now that the UNSC is doing OIC bidding,” she said.
The human rights activist admitted that drawing a line between one’s religion and the laws of the country where a person lives is a challenge for modern democracies. She noted that certain loopholes could be found under the pretext of freedom of religion.
“One must also take into consideration the concept of ‘choice’ as a guideline. With specific regards to the burqa, it is a common understanding that victims of abuse have little to no choice. Abuse victims are stripped of free choice, movement, and punished for ‘disobedience’ and perceived rebellion,” she said.
She further questioned how the burqa could be a choice if its use is mandatory in Islam and not wearing it is punishable by imprisonment, lashings or even death.  Williams noted that an “incalculable number of women” have suffered abuse for their decision to stop wearing full-body veils.
“When migrating to democratic countries which enshrine equality between genders, this norm is not necessarily abandoned, particularly if impinging Muslim community pressure is present. The funding of mosques throughout the West by the Saudis, and now even by Turkey, enables the proliferation of Wahhabi/Salafi ideology which mandates the covering of women,” she added.
“Us” vs “Them” Narrative in Human Rights Struggle
Williams told Sputnik that the global struggle for human rights today could be described as “dispiriting.” She explained that it’s plagued with an “us-versus-them narrative,” where “us” are “Western white people and Jews” and “them” are everyone else, including Muslims and blacks.
“When one thinks of human rights, one should simultaneously think of equality of value between races, genders and equal rights to practice religious beliefs. The key word is ‘equal’, not special privileges and supremacist entitlements that harm the whole. Why are human rights violations tolerated from some like: female inferiority, female genital mutilation, child brides, forced marriage, murdering gays, persecuting religious minorities?” she wondered….
“Many governments have cowered and prioritized their own fear of being called ‘racist’, ‘Islamophobic’, and ‘xenophobic’ over the security and freedoms of their people,” she concluded.


republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Turkish leader Recep Tayyip Erdogan has promised that “Ankara will produce first long-range missiles by 2021.”
This is a matter of concern coming from an Islamic leader as ambitious and aggressive as Erdogan.
  • He accused Europe of starting a war between Islam and Christianity in 2017, after a ruling by the European Court of Justice (ECJ) that allowed employers to ban headscarves, stemming from the case of a Muslim receptionist who was fired for wearing her headscarf to work in Belgium. Subsequently, the ECJ ruled that “bans on the wearing of any political, philosophical or religious sign does not constitute direct discrimination.”
  • This past summer, Erdogan slammed Austria’s move to close mosques and expel Turkish-funded imams. He called the decision anti-Islamic and promised a response, adding that “these measures taken by the Austrian prime minister are, I fear, leading the world toward a war between the cross and the crescent.”
  • Erdogan has also threatened to make “sick Europe” pay “for ‘humiliating & oppressing’ Turks,” and he has called for “an ‘army of of Islam’ to attack Israel on all sides.”
  • Last winter, Erdogan declared jihad on the Kurds and dispatched an army of thousands of soldiers to “decimate” them, following “conquest prayers” in 90,000 mosques, calling on Muslims to be “ruthless against unbelievers.”
Erdogan is preparing for jihad in service of his dream of a revived Ottoman Empire. He needs to be stymied in his efforts to build long-range missiles, just as Iran’s nuclear ambitions have been reined in by Trump. The Trump administration has already threatened Turkey with sanctions if Ankara goes ahead with its production of long-range missiles.

“Turkey war warning: Erdogan promises Ankara will produce first LONG-RANGE MISSILES by 2021,” by Alahna Kindred, Express, October 31, 2018:
TURKEY’S President said it will produce its first long-range missiles by 2021.
President RecepTayyip Erdogan said today that work to build Turkey’s first domestically produced long-range air missile system has already begun.
It is unclear how far its missiles will travel, but its first delivery is planned for 2021.
Erdogan is also buying a S-400 surface-to-air missiles from Russia.
The S-400 is a ground-to-air defence system designed to hit air attack weapons, and is capable of destroying aerial targets up to 400 kilometres away, earning it prestige as one of the most effective missiles of its type in the world.
The state-owned Anadolu news agency quoted Minister Hulusi Akar as saying last week that the installation of the S-400 missile system would begin in next October.
Turkey and Russia signed a loan agreement on the sale of the missiles to Ankara, Turkey’s capital, in 2017.
But the United States has raised concerns over the deal, fearing that if Turkey purchases the S-400 alongside Nato’s F-35 stealth jets then information about the aircrafts capabilities could be relayed back to Moscow.
The US has threatened Turkey with sanctions if Ankara goes ahead with the deal. …..


republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:

I thought that Project Veritas couldn't deliver anything more damning than the Gillum video. But the Beto video is arguably worse. At least the Florida video didn't involve confessing to any crimes.
Featured in this report are campaign staffers who work on Congressman O’Rourke’s US Senate campaign discussing how they use campaign resources to help Honduran aliens and transport them to airports and bus stations.
“The material Project Veritas Action Fund captured shows campaign workers covering up the true nature of spending of campaign funds and intentionally misreporting them. This violates the FEC’s rules against personal use and misreporting. It also violates Section 1001, making a false statement to the federal government. The FEC violations impose civil penalties, including fines of up to $10,000 or 200 percent of the funds involved. Violations of Section 1001 are criminal and include imprisonment of up to five years.”
But the question is whether that will lead to any meaningful action.
 Beto Campaign Manager Says "No Comment" After Saying "Don't Worry" in Undercover Video


 Anti-Israel activists exploit the murder of 11 Jews to attack the president and police officers. 
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:

 Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, is an investigative journalist and writer focusing on the radical Left and Islamic terrorism.
As President Trump arrived in Squirrel Hill to pay his respects to the 11 Jews brutally murdered in the Tree of Life synagogue, If Not Now, a leftist anti-Israel hate group notorious for targeting Jewish charities, unleashed an ugly hatefest that defiled the solemnity of the day.
Keffiyahs, a symbol of Muslim anti-Semitic violence, SEIU shirts and multicolored wigs were visible in the mob. A handful of protesters misused ‘shofars’, a religious ritual item sounded on the holiest Jewish days of the year, and not meant to be desecrated in street protests. Despite attempts to appropriate Jewishness, there was nothing Jewish about the ugly hatred and exploitation of murdered Jews.
Even though three police officers had risked their lives and were wounded trying to stop the gunman, the If Not Now flyer for the event condemned the “police state” and touted the black supremacist hate group, Black Lives Matter, alongside Free Palestine. An If Not Now speaker bizarrely bleated, “More cops in shuls will not make us safer. More cops in schools will not make us safer.”
Where were If Not Now members while the officers, Daniel Mead, Michael Smidga, Anthony Burke and Timothy Matson, were being shot at in the Tree of Life synagogue? Blogging about intersectionality? Tweeting anti-Israel memes? Plotting their next hate rally targeting police officers and Israeli soldiers?
When the shooting was over and it was safe, they convened a hateful rally to attack Jews, Israel, Trump and the very police officers who had saved lives and stopped the rampage of a murderous gunman.
Batya Ungar-Sargon with The Forward, an anti-Israel leftist paper, claimed that the protesters, rather than Rabbi Jeffrey Myers of the Tree of Life synagogue who graciously welcomed the president, represented, "who the majority of American Jews are".
If Not Now represents Jews the same way that Robert Bowers, the Tree of Life gunman, represents Americans. It's a marginal hate group, animated by its animosity to the Jewish State and to Jewishness. A leading If Not Now figure, Rafael Shimunov, had even used The Forward to defend a leftist Washington D.C. politician who had accused Jews of controlling the weather.
Many of the marchers exploiting the murder of Jews, and claiming to speak for Jews, weren’t Jewish.
Putting the lie to Ungar-Sargon’s Forward fake news, the Pittsburgh City Paper noted that, "participants at the event were from a diverse background, including members of several progressive groups, residents of all races, and Latino and Black activists."
“Queer Catholic Protects Jews: End White Supremacy,” one sign read.
“We are here to send the message today that we don’t want you here,” Monica Ruiz of Casa San Jose ranted. "Trump, you are not a good neighbor.”
Casa San Jose is a Latino activist group defending illegal aliens.
Tracy Baton, the African-American director of the Women’s March, denounced Trump for inserting politics, “into a city in mourning, before the dead are buried, is unacceptable.”
Except that was the entire purpose of the rally, which even ended with a call to vote in the midterm elections. It was a power grab by marginal groups and a vile attack on a president paying a condolence call. While the president was laying flowers at makeshift memorials, a leftist mob was screaming hate.
And Baton was cynically appropriating Jewish pain while representing an anti-Semitic hate group.
The Women’s March leadership had become notorious for anti-Semitic rhetoric by Linda Sarsour and Tamika Mallory.
Both women are supporters of Louis Farrakhan who had praised Hitler and compared Jews to termites.
Sarsour had urged Muslims to dehumanize Jews, and Tamika Mallory had responded to Jewish protests against her support for Farrakhan by tweeting, “If your leader does not have the same enemies as Jesus, they may not be THE leader!”  Then she targeted the ADL over its criticism of her anti-Semitism.
Baton had appeared with Tamika Mallory.
If there’s anything more inappropriate than a protest rally before the dead are buried, it’s an anti-Semitic hate group hijacking murdered Jews for its own political agenda.
One of the few "Jewish" speakers at the hate mob was Diana Clarke, an organizer for the If Now Now hate group. When Clarke isn't disrupting condolence calls for the Jewish dead, she is researching the evils of the Jews. Namely, "the way Ashkenazi Jews accessed whiteness by participating in the white settlement of Native lands and violence towards Native people."
No doubt the hate group activist trolling a condolence call for the dead has plenty of insights into how the “Ashkenazi Jews” murdered at Tree of Life “accessed whiteness” as they were being murdered by a white supremacist.
Clarke also appeared to have signed on to a letter by an anti-Semitic hate group calling for a boycott of Jewish Israeli theater.
Also there was Arielle Cohen, the surly co-chair of the Pittsburgh chapter of the Democratic Socialists of America, who is also associated with the If Not Now hate group.
The DSA has supported at least one openly anti-Semitic candidate, Maria Estrada, a Farrakhan supporter, who had accused Jews of committing atrocities out of the belief that as "one of 'God's chosen people'" they feel "superior and justified". When rebuked for her anti-Semitism, Maria told a Jewish Democrat, “try keeping your party, your religion and your people in check".
The DSA’s 2017 convention featured representatives of anti-Semitic European leftists, including Jeremy Corbyn in the UK and France's Jean-Luc Mélenchon, a Holocaust denier. The Mélenchon issue offended even some of the DSA’s Jewish collaborators. But it didn’t stop them from continuing to collude.
The If Not Now march joined forces with another march by Bend the Arc. The media had initially misreported a statement by the leftist group that President Trump was not welcome in Pittsburgh as a declaration by “Jewish leaders”. In reality, Bend the Arc is headed by Stosh Cotler, an anti-Israel activist and former sex club dancer. Its PAC was set up by the son of George Soros
It was only fitting that the few Jewish participants in this deranged hatefest would be far more anti-Semitic than its non-Jewish participants. Jews who participate in anti-Semitic movements invariably feel the need to demonstrate that they belong by being more anti-Semitic than their non-Jewish peers.
The bizarre freakshow finally concluded at the Sixth Presbyterian Church, its ending every bit as Jewish as its beginning.
As President Trump arrived at the Tree of Life synagogue, Rev. Susan Rothenberg, a Presbyterian minister (pictured above), began screaming, “You are not welcome here!”
The Presbyterian Church has become notorious for its support of BDS and its affinity for anti-Semitic terrorist groups.
Earlier this year, the Jewish Federation of Greater Pittsburgh had cut ties with the Pittsburgh Theological Seminary for hosting a co-founder of the Sabeel Ecumenical Liberation Theology Center whose rhetoric was "theologically loaded" with anti-Semitism.
In an example of Sabeel anti-Semitism cited by the ADL, was the blood libel that, “Jesus is on the cross again with thousands of crucified Palestinians around him…The Israeli government crucifixion system is operating daily.”
The Sixth Presbyterian Church has welcomed BDS events targeting the Jewish State, including appearances by Sabeel speakers. It has advocated for BDS. Just this year, it promoted a boycott of HP over its ties to the Jewish State.
And so a march, supposedly against anti-Semitism, featuring an anti-Semitic hate group, wrapped up at an anti-Semitic church.
It couldn’t have been a more fitting end to a disgraceful orgy of leftist hatred.
This was not, as its participants insisted, a vigil. It did not mourn, it hated.
There was nothing Jewish about it, despite the disgraceful attempt to misappropriate Jewish phrases and rituals for political purposes. If Not Now activists rallied the crowd to sing, “Olam Chesed Yibaneh”, but ignorantly mistranslated, “Chesed” as “Love”.
They stepped over the bodies of dead Jews to lead a mob of anti-Semitic lefties to serve an anti-Semitic agenda. And they ended their orgy of hate at an anti-Semitic church.
“This evil, anti-Semitic attack is an assault on all of us. It is an assault on humanity. It must be confronted and condemned everywhere it rears its ugly head. We must stand with our Jewish brothers and sisters to defeat anti-Semitism and vanquish the forces of hate. Those seeking their destruction, we will seek their destruction,” President Trump said.
The hateful rally that greeted him is a reminder that those hateful anti-Semitic forces are everywhere.


 Obamas’ first TV show based on big government book
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Barack and Michelle Obama are in talks with Netflix to produce an anti-Trump TV show, according to media reports.
The former president and first lady bought the production rights to Michael Lewis’ book The Fifth Risk, which was critical of the Trump administration, and are currently in production talks with Netflix, reported The Week.
“Netflix in May announced a multi-year deal in which the Obamas would produce shows for the streaming platform,” the paper reported. “At the time, The New York Times reported that Obama did not intend to ‘wage a public campaign against his successor’ with these shows, so either The Fifth Risk won’t be as much of a takedown of President Trump as one might initially think, or Obama has changed his mind and decided that a public campaign against Trump might not be such a bad idea after all.”

Oddly enough, the Obamas could also use the show to promote big government without even mentioning Trump. According to a press release by the book’s publisher:
Michael Lewis’s brilliant narrative takes us into the engine rooms of a government under attack by its own leaders. In Agriculture the funding of vital programs like food stamps and school lunches is being slashed. The Commerce Department may not have enough staff to conduct the 2020 Census properly. Over at Energy, where international nuclear risk is managed, it’s not clear there will be enough inspectors to track and locate black market uranium before terrorists do.
In other words, the entire premise of the book – and presumably the TV show – promotes bureaucracy over elected officials when the aims of the former coincide with Obama’s past administration.
It’s a premise that only works if you agree – or can be lead to believe – that big government is the way to go, and considering how visibly partisan this is, the proposed TV show indicates that the establishment considers the spread of ‘limited government’ principles as a serious threat to its dwindling status quo.


 'Purge Night' Riots in France as Interior Minister Warns Mass Immigration Could Cause Societal Breakdown
 “Today, we live side by side. I fear that tomorrow it will be face to face”
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:

Major cities in France were hit by rioting last night as the country’s former Interior Minister warned that mass immigration could bring societal breakdown within five years.
“French police arrested more than 100 people after gangs of masked youths stormed through Paris suburbs and the center of Lyon on Halloween night, authorities said on Thursday, following a message on social media calling for a “purge” against police,” reports Reuters.
Video footage shows one of the incidents in Lyon.

Areas of Paris were also hit by unrest, including the deprived Seine-Saint-Denis area, which is home to 400,000 illegal immigrants and where last night, “a sportswear store was looted and young people robbing a grocery store attacked police with acid.”
Some of the riots were inspired by “messages circulated on social media” about the movie The Purge, which depicts a chaotic urban dystopia in which all crimes are made legal for one day.
Meanwhile, in an interview given by France’s then Interior Minister Gérard Collomb back in February but only recently published by Valeurs Actuelles, Collomb admits that the country’s security situation is dire thanks to mass immigration.
Asked what he thought about the security situation, Collomb responded, “The relations between people are very hard, people don’t want to live together.”
Pressed as to whether he thought mass immigration was responsible for this unrest, Collomb responded, “Enormously so,” before going on to acknowledge that France did not need any more immigration.
“Communities in France are engaging in conflict with one another more and more and it’s becoming very violent,” said Collomb, agreeing with the interviewer that some form of societal breakdown like partition or secession was a major concern.
“How much time do we have before it’s too late?” the interviewer asked Collomb, to which he replied, “I don’t want to create fear, but I think there’s very little time left….It’s difficult to estimate, but I would say that within five years the situation could become irreversible. Yes, we have five, six years to avoid the worst.”
Potentially dismayed at President Macron’s refusal to act on mass immigration, Collomb resigned last month, commenting, “Today, we live side by side. I fear that tomorrow it will be face to face.”
As I document in the video below, Paris has changed for the worse over the last few years, with violent crime and sexual assault on the increase thanks to mass migration and a total lack of integration.


 Election Meddling: Google Algorithm Buries 'Blexit'
 Candace Owens website ranks number 1 on every other major search engine; Not Google
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Google is being accused of engaging in election meddling by burying Candace Owens’ Blexit website in its algorithm despite the website ranking number 1 on every other major search engine.
A user over at the Donald subreddit noticed the scandal and produced a series of screenshots to illustrate how Blexit, which is a campaign to encourage black people to leave the Democratic party, is being all but blacklisted by Google.
Typing ‘Blexit’ into Google results in nothing but negative news articles about the campaign, but that’s not the worse of it.
The first ‘Blexit’ website listed in the results is in no way related to Candace Owens’ campaign and is a totally separate organization.
This organization even had to issue an apology because people were mistakenly donating money in the belief it was going to Owens’ official Blexit campaign.
“They noticed a massive increase of members and donations in the last few days. In other words: Due to Google’s fuckery with its algorithm, Candace Owen’s Blexit movement lost out on members and donations,” notes the Reddit user.
Typing ‘Blexit Website’ into Google also returns a completely unaffiliated website called BlexitMN.
The sheer scale of the manipulation is realized when one searches for ‘Blexit’ on other major search engines, including DuckDuckGo, Yahoo and Bing.
In every instance, the correct result, Candace Owens’ official ‘Blexit’ website, appears as the number one ranked search result.
“This cannot possibly be a coincidence,” writes the Reddit user. “This is active fuckery with their algorithm on behalf of Google. Every other search engine gets it right but Google, the market leader by far, somehow is incapable of doing the same? This is active and intentional censorship of a political group shortly before a midterm election. This is influencing the election a lot more than some Russian twats creating facebook memes in Moscow.”
Despite Big Tech giants routinely banning and censoring users for what they claim represents “election meddling,” few questions are being asked about the power of the likes of Google, Twitter and Facebook to sway voters.
Studies have shown that algorithmic changes can shift millions of votes during elections.
According to Dr. Robert Epstein, Google alone was probably responsible for shifting 2-3 million votes in Hillary Clinton’s favor during the presidential election as a result of algorithm manipulation.
“The fact that it’s really just two or three companies – mainly two – and that they have similar politics, that just makes this even crazier. In fact, I say in this upcoming article that if these companies in November all happen to be favoring the same political party, I estimate conservatively – and I emphasize conservatively, even though I’m not a ‘conservative’ – that they could shift upwards of 12 million votes,” he warned.


republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:

 SPRINGFIELD, Ill. — The attorney general of Illinois has filed a lawsuit against a Christian bed and breakfast owner for not paying $30,000 in damages to two men who filed a discrimination complaint against him after he declined to allow them to use his property to hold a ceremony celebrating their civil union.
Attorney General Lisa Madigan filed a complaint in Ford County Circuit Court on Oct. 23 against Walder Vacuflo Inc., which operates the TimberCreek Bed and Breakfast in Paxton.
“Madigan’s complaint alleges Walder Vacuflo has failed to comply with an order issued by the Illinois Human Rights Commission (IHRC) directing the company to pay damages to a gay couple after refusing to host their civil union ceremony,” a press release from Madigan’s office outlines.
As previously reported, TimberCreek identifies itself on the main page of its website as “an upscale Christian country bed and breakfast,” situated in the midst of a small farming community. The facility hosts church retreats, baby and bridal showers, business meetings and other events.

In 2011, local resident Todd Wathen contacted TimberCreek via email to inquire if the bed and breakfast would be hosting civil union ceremonies after Illinois approved the unions that year via the “Religious Freedom Protection and Civil Union Act.” Owner Jim Walder replied that the facility had no such plans, and allegedly advised Wathen that “homosexuality is immoral and unnatural,” and that “it’s not too late to change your behavior.”
Three days later, Wathen filed a discrimination complaint with the Illinois Human Rights Commission. The American Civil Liberties Union of Illinois (ACLU) also soon became involved and sought emotional damages for Wathen and his partner, Mark.
In 2016, Michael Robinson, an administrative law judge appointed by the Commission, ordered Walder to pay $30,000 in damages to the men ($15,000 each), as well as $50,000 in attorney’s fees and more than $1,200 in costs.

Robinson also mandated that Walder follow the Illinois Human Rights Act by not declining further events, and that he additionally host Wathen’s celebration at the bed and breakfast within one year. The two men held a ceremony in their yard in 2011 after being declined; they did not seek other facilities as alternatives.
However, Walder, who advised that he could not comply with the order because of his Christian faith, filed an appeal. Commissioners Duke Alden, Terry Cosgrove and Patricia Bakalis-Yadgir, who were assigned to the case, soon issued an order stating that they had “declined further review” of a “recommended order and decision,” allowing Robinson’s order to stand.
But the background of two of the three commissioners posed an issue as Cosgrove had been inducted into the Chicago Gay and Lesbian Hall of Fame, and himself had filed a discrimination case against a local bar. He has also lobbied for state laws about the matter.
Alden serves as the chairman of Howard Brown Health, a health and social services organization for homosexual and “transgendered” persons. He also was a part of a “Presidential Debate Viewing Party” for homosexuals in Chicago to “cheer on Hillary Clinton.”
“[A]ssigning two out of three commissioners who are either LGBT activists or openly gay to review our case is corrupt and indefensible,” Walder consequently told the Paxton Record. “[B]oth commissioners should have honorably recused themselves from the review.”
“This feels like blatant reverse discrimination against all business owners, Christian or otherwise, by the IHRC, which is supposed to be an unbiased, neutral party in resolving complaints,” he said. “It begs the question how this unelected commission’s rulings can ever be taken seriously again.”
Attorney General Madigan has now sued Walder for neither paying the damages or allowing the men to hold the ceremony on his property, as ordered by Robinson and upheld by the panel.
“My office is committed to holding businesses accountable if they refuse service to members of the public based on sexual orientation,” she said in a statement.
However, Walder says that homosexuals are welcome to visit his bed and breakfast; he just cannot accommodate their ceremony due to his religious beliefs.
“None of this goes back to hate. None of this goes back to bigotry. None of this goes back to being homophobic. … All of this goes back to the Bible and how God sees homosexuality,” he said in 2016. “I don’t want to see someone not go to Heaven, because the opposite of that is unfathomable.”


 Featured Image
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
OTTAWA, Ontario, November 1, 2018 (LifeSiteNews) – Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s meeting with LGBT activists and pop icons Tegan and Sara Quin has Christians scratching their heads in wonder.
“How much more can you possibly gay-ify Canada than it already is?” wondered Jack Fonseca, a senior political strategist with Campaign Life Coalition, in an interview Wednesday.
“Canadians are non-stop bombarded with homosexual and transgender propaganda in our children’s schools, in the liberal media’s newspaper, TV and radio reporting, and from pop culture celebrities like the Quins,” he said.
The 38-year-old twin lesbians run their own foundation, the homosexual activist Tegan and Sara Foundation. On the television show Power Play, the Quins told host Don Martin they’ve met with the Canadian prime minister.
And they also claimed lesbians are under-represented, under-researched, and under-funded in Canada.
The Office of the Prime Minister did not respond to a request for comment about that meeting.
But Trudeau’s militantly pro-LGBT stand is well known.
“I am on your side. I will fight for you, and I will fight with you,” Trudeau told those gathered at the Toronto Hilton for the pro-homosexual Egale Identity Gala earlier this year.
According to Fonseca, militant LGBT activists already have the most powerful institutions and corporations under their control.
“It’s breathtaking to witness the gay lobby’s insatiable lust for power and control of literally everything,” said Fonseca. “That’s what this is really about. Power and control.”
“The human rights tribunals in this country are stacked with, and controlled by, gay-activists who see it as their personal mission to persecute Christians with biased, kangaroo court decisions that go against Christians almost every single time,” he said.
“The courts and police have fallen in line with LGBT orthodoxy and do their bidding upon command.”

Calls for ‘diversity and inclusion’ are ‘actually dog whistles for more oppression of religious people and their rights’

Kathleen Wynne, Ontario’s former premier and a lesbian, laced every aspect of Ontario’s educational system with ideological gay propaganda through an explicit sex-ed program. Pro-gay activists in Alberta’s New Democratic Party government are doing the same, said Fonseca.
“Homosexual activists who started out commandeering a single day to celebrate gay pride, next expanded their control of the calendar to an entire ‘gay pride week,’ and today, we are forced as a society to celebrate the entire month of June as gay pride month,” he said.
In the biggest corporations in Canada, influential, organized, and professional gay activists have succeeded at putting in place corporate-wide indoctrination programs under the guise of “diversity and inclusion,” said Fonseca.
These activists have also gotten these corporations to undertake public LGBT propaganda campaigns in their branches everywhere, he said.
“Women’s sports are on the verge of being destroyed with an increasing frequency of sexually-confused biological males beating real women in competitions, and taking home the gold medal or champions’ prizes,” noted Fonseca.
At Trinity Western University in British Columbia earlier this year, a pair of 7-2 rulings (here and here) by Canada’s top court effectively forced the university to choose between having a law school or following Christianity. The court ruled it was “proportionate and reasonable” for the law societies of British Columbia and Ontario to refuse accreditation to future Trinity Western law school grads because the college’s community covenant was considered to be discriminatory. The community covenant upheld Christian sexual ethics. (Trinity Western University eventually caved and abandoned the morality pledge.)
“Gay activists have effectively banned biblical Christians from having access to an entire profession, i.e. become a lawyer in many provinces,” said Fonseca.
And even though Wynne is no longer premier of Ontario, one of her legacies, Bill 89, has led to a policy at public adoption agencies which bans Christians who seek to adopt or foster children, with the agencies telling the applicants they are unfit, he said.
“How much more power does the LGBT lobby want?” asked Fonseca. “The truth is that these powerful pop stars who have direct access to the most powerful man in Canada aren’t truly interested in protecting same-sex attracted Canadians whom they claim are ‘disadvantaged’ and ‘oppressed.’”
“The reality is that today, LGBT activists have all the power,” he said. “In 2018, they are the oppressors and bible-believing Christians, as well as people of other faiths, are the oppressed.”
Under Trudeau’s leadership, Ottawa has also demanded that all employers applying for grants to hire students for the summer sign a “values attestation,” a document that states the employer’s support for abortion and transgender “rights.” This past summer, that led to many pro-life and faith-based groups being denied Canada Summer Jobs grants while Planned Parenthood-affiliated organizations across the country received $88,270 under the program.
“Christians and those of other faiths need to see that these calls for ever more ‘diversity and inclusion’ are actually dog whistles for more oppression of religious people and their rights,” said Fonseca.
The Quin sisters’ real agenda is about taking away parental rights, he warned.
“It’s about using the power and resources of the federal government to shame, vilify and persecute Christians until their lives are either ruined, or they abandon their religious beliefs and their natural rights so as to escape the weight of oppressive government powers,” he said.


republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:

 The second migrant caravan to come from Guatemala into Mexico since October 19 crossed into Mexico on October 29, defying a large police presence. An AP article that same day reported that members of the caravan were believed to be armed with bombs and guns. Some members of the caravan made Molotov cocktails out of gasoline-filled soft-drink bottles, and others modified PVC tubes to launch fireworks.
Mexican authorities reported that migrants attacked its agents with rocks, glass bottles, and fireworks when they broke through a gate on the Mexican end of the bridge spanning the Suchiate River, but police managed to push them back.
Mexican Interior Secretary Alfonso Navarrete Prida expressed regret for what he called a second “violent attempt" to storm the border, and accused the caravan organizers of placing the elderly, pregnant women, and children at the front, putting them at risk of being crushed.
“Fortunately, that did not happen,” said the secretary.
Despite the difficulty of crossing the border into Mexico (many waded or swam across the Suchiate River), more than 1,000 people in this second migrant caravan began walking through southern Mexico on October 30 and reached the Mexican border city of Tapachula. This placed them about 250 miles behind the first, larger caravan of about 4,000 mainly Honduran migrants that entered Mexico 10 days ago. They are more than 1,100 miles from Reynosa, across the Rio Grande from McAllen, Texas.
An earlier caravan that headed toward the United States last spring also began with more than 1,500 mostly Honduran marchers, but only about 300 reached Tijuana on the U.S.-Mexico border. Of those just 122 were arrested for jumping the border, while more than 330 followed government directions and waited to apply for asylum through the official ports of entry, and are now in processing in the United States.
Despite the Trump administration announcing very publicly a zero-tolerance policy for the caravan, authorities have announced charges against only a small fraction of the 122 people who jumped the border.
The New American reported on October 29 that the “migrant caravan” turned down an offer of asylum made by Mexico and insisted it would continue its march to illegally cross the U.S. border.
President Trump has dispatched 5,000 troops to help secure the U.S. border, calling the situation “an emergency.”

Related articles:
Migrants Not Stopping — Vow To Storm U.S. Southern Border
Migrant Invasion Force Doubles and Another From El Salvador Starts
Migrant Caravan No. 2 Heads North, Trump Threatens to Cut Aid to Honduras

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
“I plan to introduce legislation along the same lines as the proposed executive order from [the] president,” promised Senator Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.; shown) on Tuesday.
President Donald Trump provoked an outpouring of opposition this week to his proposal to issue an executive order ending the concept of “birthright citizenship” — the stance that just because someone is born on U.S. soil, that person is automatically a citizen, at birth, of the United States.
Graham praised Trump’s effort to eliminate birthright citizenship. “Finally, a president willing to take on this absurd policy of birthright citizenship,” Graham tweeted. “I’ve always supported comprehensive immigration reform — and at the same time — the elimination of birthright citizenship.” Graham added that birthright citizenship “is a magnet for illegal immigration,” and “needs to come to an end.”

Trump had vowed early in his presidential bid, in 2015, that he would take on the interpretation of the 14th Amendment that any person who happens to born on U.S. soil is a citizen of the United States.
Unfortunately, even House Speaker Paul Ryan took issue with Trump’s call to end the practice by executive order. Vice President Mike Pence, however, appeared to support Trump, taking issue with those who argue that any change in the concept of birthright citizenship would require a constitutional amendment, noting that “the Supreme Court of the United States has never ruled on whether or not the language of the 14th Amendment subject to the jurisdiction thereof applies specifically to people who are in the country illegally.”
It is certainly a very important issue, considering that it is estimated that as many as 400,000 children are born every year in the U.S. to illegal aliens. This makes them “natural born citizens” of the United States, according to a fairly recent interpretation of the 14th Amendment. Then, when these “citizens” reach their 21st birthday, they can petition for legal status for their parents.
This is why these babies born on U.S. soil to parents who are in the country illegally are often dubbed “anchor babies.” An anchor baby provides his or her parents a cornucopia of welfare benefits.
But, can President Trump end the practice with an executive order? Interestingly, almost none of those arguing that Trump cannot do so have defended then-President Barack Obama’s issuance of an executive order to implement DACA.
For that matter, if the 14th Amendment actually does state — as poor a public policy as that is — that any child born on U.S. soil is a citizen at birth, can even Congress do anything about it, as Senator Graham has suggested?
The 14th Amendment’s language seems quite clear that only children born to parents who have no other citizenship can be a U.S. citizen. For example, when Senator Marco Rubio’s parents came from Cuba, they began the legal process to become naturalized citizens of the United States. During that time period, little Marco was born on U.S. soil, to parents who were subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. Therefore, it is logical to presume that Rubio was a citizen of the United States, at birth.
“All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside” (emphasis added), reads the 14th Amendment. The phrase “and subject to the jurisdiction thereof,” has, of course, been ignored by those promoting the concept of open borders. Yet, the words have some meaning, or otherwise the authors of the 14th Amendment would not have included them. They would have been redundant under the spurious interpretation that any child born on U.S. soil is a citizen at birth.
The purpose of the 14th Amendment was to make it clear that former slaves, regarded as non-citizens under the Supreme Court decision Scott v. Sanford of 1857, were citizens of the United States. In almost all cases, the former slaves did not have an acknowledged parent who was a U.S. citizen, and could not obtain citizenship that way. Without this necessity to establish the citizenship status of former slaves, the 14th Amendment would not have even been considered. Its clear purpose was to confer citizenship on former slaves, not children of illegal aliens.
A cursory reading of the statements by the principal authors of the 14th Amendment makes it so clear that even a law school professor or a federal judge should be able to understand it — the amendment was not intended to make citizens out of illegal aliens.
In 1982, Justice William Brennan (one of the most liberal judges to ever sit on the Supreme Court) added a footnote in the case of Pyler v. Doe that he saw “no plausible distinction” that could be made “between resident aliens whose entry into the United States was lawful, and resident aliens whose entry was unlawful.”
In other words, that was the opinion of one member of the Supreme Court — in a footnote. The Court has never ruled on the relevance of the words “subject to the jurisdiction thereof.” A footnote by one liberal judge hardly constitutes a precedent.
As a practical matter, it would probably be best for Congress to enact legislation supporting the president's interpretation. And, if someone does not like it, they can always challenge that interpretation. It would be difficult, from the clear wording of the 14th Amendment, how any person, much less a judge of the Supreme Court, could come to any other conclusion.