Translate

Friday, January 26, 2018

TRUMP STEALS THUNDER FROM DAVOS ELITE IN SWITZERLAND

 Trump Steals Thunder From Davos Elite
TRUMP STEALS THUNDER FROM DAVOS ELITE
 Trump a Howard Roark-style American cowboy rebelling against powerful evil
BY KIT DANIELS
 
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 
By his mere presence at Davos, President Trump is forcing EU leaders to make a dangerous attack on nation-states, a tremendous development given the mainstream media once claimed globalism was a “conspiracy theory.”
Once again Trump is forcing the power structure to react to him and his trademark nationalism, which reveals the inherent weakness of globalism: it only takes one man to act as a lion to defeat the sheep of a system designed by the Rockefellers and Rothchilds.

For decades, the globalists have gained control by selling the false idea that national identity still exists as they forged Europe into a superstate in which every nation is reduced to a vassal of an unelected bureaucracy.
But now, thanks to Trump, Brexit and the ongoing migrant crisis, average Europeans are starting to question why they’re losing their cultures and identities to the EU – and they look at Trump as a Howard Roark-style American cowboy whose undeterred rebellion against a legion of doom inspires their own individual thoughts and opinions.

This leaves the globalists in the untenable position to directly attack nationalism, but it’ll only backfire on them; the sparks of ideas have already ignited the minds of Europeans who’ve spent years living under decay, which they now realize is the direct result of globalism pushed by the very leaders who are smearing Trump.
In short, Europeans view Trump’s rebellion as much needed change.
Read this excerpt from the International Business Times:
On the eve of President Donald Trump’s visit to Davos, Switzerland, European leaders on Wednesday came together to warn the world about the perils of nationalism. European Leaders warned the World Economic Forum on the dangerous implications of slipping back to nationalism, while defending free trade, which president Trump has opposed, and encouraged global co-operation between nations.
This statement reeks of hypocrisy: you can’t have independent nations without a hint of nationalism, but the hypocrisy makes sense once you start thinking like a globalist.
For example, European globalists define “nations” as vassals of the EU. Just look up the definition of a vassal, then compare it with the headlines reporting how the EU is requiring migrant quotas on member countries.
And in another example of hypocrisy, the New York Times is now defending globalism barely a year after claiming it was a “conspiracy theory.”
From a Times article entitled Globalism: A Far-Right Conspiracy Theory Buoyed by Trump dated Nov. 14, 2016:
Those conspiratorial beliefs were bolstered when former President George Bush celebrated the end of the Cold War in a 1991 speech by saying it was the dawn of a “new world order.” His use of the phrase was taken as proof by many that a globalist conspiracy really was afoot.
“It was very easy for them, especially because he was the one who said it, to take that ball and run with it,” Mr. Pitcavage said. “From that point on, the phrase became the shorthand for that kind of globalism conspiracy theory.”
What a difference Trump’s first year in office made. Now the New York Times now admits globalism does exist because, like EU leaders, the mainstream media is forced to defend it.
Here’s a Nov. 22, 2018 article from the Times entitled Fox in the Globalist Henhouse? Davos Awaits Trump’s Arrival:
Mr. Trump, who is to arrive later this week, is drawing a mix of breathless anticipation, anxiousness and downright agitation among a crowd that has long considered him an outsider.
Davos has always been a playground for elites who believe in globalism, climate change and free trade. The cast of multinational leaders this year ranges from chief executives like Jamie Dimon of JPMorgan Chase to philanthropists like Bill Gates and policymakers like Angela Merkel, Germany’s chancellor. Over the years, it has attracted artists like Bono and Matt Damon.
__________________________________________________
 FULL SPEECH: President Donald Trump Davos Speech 1/26/18
 President Trump addressed world leaders, chief executives, celebrities, and other global elites in a major speech at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland. The Davos conference is an annual gathering of around 2,500 of the most influential political and economic leaders from around the world. President Trump is expected to promote his "America First" policy at this gathering, which could be controversial given the pro-globalist bent of the Davos forum. Watch our LIVE COVERAGE of President Trump's Davos speech, including a pre-show and post-show where we read your comments live on the air.
 President Trump has Dinner with European Business Leaders, Davos, Switzerland
 

WOMAN SEXUALLY ABUSED BY SPORTS DOCTOR LARRY NASSAR PRESENTS GOSPEL IN VICTIM IMPACT STATEMENT

http://dailyentertainmentnews.com/wpgo/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/rachael-denhollander-larry-nassar-8.jpg
 http://static4.businessinsider.com/image/59e7b29690992406288b4a8a-889/ap17229711236883.jpg
 https://www.gannett-cdn.com/-mm-/074d5f7ecc0ce812ca86f1f8658ac0d10e5cf9ce/c=112-0-1888-1335&r=x404&c=534x401/local/-/media/2017/05/26/MIGroup/Lansing/636313927776604925-nassar1.JPG
WOMAN SEXUALLY ABUSED BY SPORTS DOCTOR LARRY NASSAR PRESENTS GOSPEL 
IN VICTIM IMPACT STATEMENT 
BY HEATHER CLARK
 
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 LANSING, Mich. — A former gymnast who had been sexually abused by sports 
doctor Larry Nassar when she was 15 presented the gospel on Wednesday in 
delivering her victim impact statement in court.
Rachael Denhollander was the first woman to speak out in 2016 after USA Gymnastics was accused of failing to properly handle sexual assault accusations lodged by young gymnasts, and she was also one of the last to have a say this week as Nassar was sentenced to 40 to 175 years in prison.
“Larry, you have become a man ruled by selfish, perverted desires. A man defined by his daily choices over, and over again, to feed that selfishness and perversion,” she said as she addressed Nassar during her 36-minute statement. “You chose to pursue your wicked desires, no matter what it cost others. The opposite of what you have done, therefore, is choosing to love sacrificially, no matter what it costs me.”
Denhollander noted that she had observed Nassar previously bring his Bible to court and that he had said that he had prayed for forgiveness.

“If you have read the Bible you carry, you know that the definition of sacrificial love portrayed in it is of God Himself loving so sacrificially that He gave up everything to pay the penalty for sin He did not commit. By His grace, I too, choose to love—no matter what it costs,” she said.
The 32-year-old, who is now married and works as an attorney, then warned Nassar that he must repent of his evil deeds.
“You spoke of praying for forgiveness, but Larry, if you have read the Bible you carry, then you know that forgiveness does not come by doing good things, as if good deeds can wipe out the incredible evil you have committed,” Denhollander outlined. “It comes from repentance, which requires facing and acknowledging the truth about what you have done, in all its utter depravity and horror. Without mitigation. Without excuse. Without pretending you can cover it with good things.”

“The Bible you carry says it is better for a millstone to be tied around your neck and you thrown into a lake than for you to make even one child stumble. And Larry, you have wounded hundreds of children,” she continued. “The Bible you carry speaks of a final judgment where all of God’s wrath, in all its eternal terror, is poured out on men like you. Should you ever reach the point of truly facing what you have done, the weight of guilt in the face of the horrific evil you committed, will be crushing.”
After explaining the consequences of sin, Denhollander presented the grace of the Lord as Christ took the place of undeserving sinners.
“And that is what makes the gospel of Christ so sweet. Because it gives hope and grace where none should be found,” she outlined. “And I pray you experience the soul-crushing weight of guilt someday, so that it can be followed by true repentance and forgiveness from God.”
According to reports, Nassar dabbed at his eyes during some of the victim impact statements that were delivered over the seven-day hearing, and other times he sat emotionless. Over 150 women who state that they were abused by Nassar while coming to him for treatment spoke during the sentencing hearing.

NEW JERSEY PUBLIC SCHOOL TEACHES "MUHAMMAD (PEACE BE UPON HIM) IS THE LAST & FINAL MESSENGER OF GOD"

 https://images.opposingviews.com/ovi/catalog/downloads/preview/rndr_782x440/2017/04/nancygayerlibbyhilsenrath-1491253831.jpg/rndr_782x440.jpg
 US School Forces Kids To Convert To Islam, Mama Bears Have ...
 VIDEO:
 NEW JERSEY PUBLIC SCHOOL TEACHES "MUHAMMAD (PEACE BE UPON HIM) 
IS THE LAST & FINAL MESSENGER OF GOD"
BY ROBERT SPENCER
 
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 
We have seen this all over the country, and in every case, the school officials insist that the school is simply teaching the tenets of Islam, not proselytizing for them. But it is noteworthy that public schools never seem to teach, say, that “Jesus is the Son of God and Savior of the world” without qualification. Whenever public schools teach about Judaism, Christianity, Buddhism, Hinduism, etc., they are careful not to teach what adherents believe as established fact. But when it comes to Islam, its tenets are being taught as established fact in public schools all over the country. There should be a federal investigation of this phenomenon, but of course, there probably will not be.

“Mom Says NJ School Assignment Recruited for Islam,” by Nick Rummell, Courthouse News Service, January 24, 2018:
NEWARK, N.J. (CN) – A New Jersey middle school that caught flak last year for requiring students to watch videos on Islam was hit Tuesday with a federal complaint.
Represented by the Thomas More Law Center, parent Libby Hilsenrath says a teacher assigned her 12-year-old’s seventh-grade class at Chatham Middle School to watch two videos at home with proselytizing messages.
The first video, “Intro to Islam,” is set to a musical version of a poem that describes “Christians and Jews as ‘infidels’ and prais[es] Muhammad in gruesome detail for slaughtering them,” according to the complaint.
Calling it a “conversion video,” Hilsenrath says the 5-minute assignment was “replete with biased, chastising statements encouraging the students … to follow the Quran and become Muslim.”
“Muhammad (Peace be upon him) is the last & final Messenger of God,” one such unqualified message in the video states.
In addition to presenting the religious teachings of Islam as facts, Hilsenrath says the video includes a link where students can download “Qaseedah Burdah,” the song with references to killing infidels.
Hilsenrath notes that the second video, an explanation of the five pillars of Islam, is a cartoon where a Muslim child explains the tenants of Islam to his non-Muslim friend, then ends with both boys walking off to “learn how to pray.”
“Due to the fact that these doctrinal messages calling for conversion to Islam were included in video format with vivid images and text, they possess greater communicative impact and are more likely to be accepted by the students viewing them than information that is spoken in a classroom or even written in a book,” the complaint states.
A worksheet component of the assignment meanwhile focused on the shahada, what Hilsenrath calls “the Islamic conversion creed and prayer.”
“Clearly, seventh graders were given a sugarcoated, false depiction of Islam,” the Thomas More Law Center said in a statement. “They were not informed of the kidnappings, beheadings, slave-trading, massacres, and persecution of non-Muslims, nor of the repression of women — all done in the name of Islam.”
Richard Thompson, president and chief counsel of the law center, issued a statement as well. “After watching this video, I can’t imagine any reasonable person saying this is not Islamic indoctrination,” he said.
Questioning why the curriculum for the Middle East and North Africa unit left out other religions, the complaint notes that “there are approximately 16 million Christians in the Middle East and approximately 6.4 million Jews living in the Middle East.”
Likewise the religious beliefs of Christianity are not covered in the unit on Latin America, a region that is 88 percent Christian, and Eastern religions are not covered in the unit on Southeast Asia, according to the complaint.
“Defendants assailed the First Amendment … by forcing children to endure the promotion of Islam in their public schools, including an explicit and direct call to the children for conversion to the religion of Islam,” the complaint states.
Hilsenrath says she and another parent emailed their concerns to school officials in early 2017. Fox News invited them to appear on Tucker Carlson’s show that February. The pair joined many other parents at a packed March 2017 open meeting of the Chatham school board.
School officials defended the curriculum at the meeting, saying it met the state requirements and that it was untrue that Islam was the only religion taught to seventh graders.
But Hilsenrath says the school’s conduct betrays hostility toward Christians. When confronted about the curriculum in January 2017, according to the complaint, Chatham’s social studies department chair sent an email where he linked to what he called a “priceless” clip from TV’s “The West Wing.” In the scene, the president character mocks a fundamentalist Christian about various tenants of the Old Testament, such as its endorsement of slavery….
______________________________________________________
THE VIDEOS FROM THIS ARTICLE:
 5 minutes Introduction to Islam
 The 5 Pillars of Islam; 1st Episode Animated 
IN ENGLISH.
 
Five Pillars of Islam taught in Public School
 
Islam and School Curriculum;
Bible Quote Not Allowed


YOUTUBE INVESTING $5 MILLION TO "COUNTER HATE & PROMOTE TOLERANCE"

YOUTUBE INVESTING $5 MILLION TO 
"COUNTER HATE & PROMOTE TOLERANCE"
BY ROBERT SPENCER
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 
Who decides what constitutes “hate speech” and what doesn’t? That is the all-important question that Leftists who call for “hate speech” to be restricted in various ways consistently ignore. The grim reality is that those in power can label any opinion they dislike as “hate speech,” and proscribe it accordingly. That is the pathway to an unbridled tyranny. That’s why the freedom of speech is absolutely essential for a free society. But YouTube and its cohorts are rushing to destroy it by means of Orwellian initiatives of this kind.

“YouTube is investing $5 million in creators who ‘counter hate and promote tolerance,’” by Lizzie Plaugic, The Verge, January 24, 2018 (thanks to David):
YouTube announced today that it plans to invest $5 million in its Creators for Change program, in an effort to help members “counter hate and promote tolerance.” Creators for Change, which launched in 2016, is a collective of 39 YouTubers who use the platform to discuss and promote important issues around the world.
The members of Creators for Change work on “impact projects” to raise awareness about things like police brutality, bullying, xenophobia, and racism. The $5 million investment will come in the form of “production and marketing support,” including several production grants, according to YouTube. The company also says it hopes to bring more creators into Creators for Change in 2018.
The fund is a small amount for a company that has an estimated value of $75 billion, but it’s an indication that YouTube wants to put more effort into ensuring its creators use their platforms for good. As Polygon points out, the investment comes just a few months after some members of Creators for Change said it was “disheartening” to see YouTube’s more controversial streamers earning huge amounts of money and views.
“It’s our duty to not promote just the negative, but the positive,” YouTuber Sam Saffold told Polygon in September. “There are so many positive YouTubers who don’t get the attention they deserve.”
YouTube has also been criticized for videos that include hate speech and terrorist propaganda. This summer, the European Union approved a set of proposals that would make companies like YouTube responsible for blocking the hate speech published on their platforms….

SHOCK VIDEO: GOOGLE HOME CENSORS JESUS CHRIST

 Shock Video: Google Home Censors Jesus Christ
SHOCK VIDEO: GOOGLE HOME CENSORS 
JESUS CHRIST 
 Glorified spy tech disses son of God 
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 
Who is Jesus Christ? Internet users are posting videos of Google products refusing to answer the simple question.
In one video uploaded Wednesday, Google fails to answer but provides an in-depth summary when asked about other religious figures including Allah.

A Facebook user who asked the same question in November 2017 received a different response.
In the older footage, Google answered, “Regardless of what you might think of him personally, Jesus Christ stands as the central figure in the history of Western Civilization.”
The answer SHOCKED ME!!! 🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯
Posted by Joshua Feuerstein on Saturday, November 25, 2017
Today when asked about Jesus, Google gives no reply and instead sends users to a Jehovah’s Witness website.
 David Sams, a resident of Brentwood, Tennessee attested, “I even asked Google who is David Sams? Google knew who I was, but Google did not know who Jesus was, Google did not know who Jesus Christ was, and Google did not know who God was.”
 Why are these products omitting the most historical figure in the Western world?
__________________________________________________
OTHER VIDEOS:
 
 Google Home wont say ✝️ Jesus Christ ✝️

 

FBI AGENTS' TEXT MESSAGES: THEY KNEW AHEAD OF TIME CLINTON WOULD NOT BE INDICTED

 https://theconservativetreehouse.files.wordpress.com/2018/01/mccabe-page-baker-w-strzok-inset.jpg
 Sean Hannity: FBI's Peter Strzok, Mistress 
Lisa Page at 'Nexus of Everything'
 FBI AGENTS' TEXT MESSAGES: THEY KNEW AHEAD OF TIME CLINTON WOULD NOT BE INDICTED
BY C. MITCHELL SHAW
 
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 
The 50,000 text messages between two lead FBI investigators who worked on the Clinton e-mail case are filled with damning revelations. Among those is a thread that shows that the two agents — Peter Stzrok and his mistress, Lisa Page — knew ahead of time (and while the “investigation” was still ongoing) that then-FBI Director Comey was planning to give Clinton a pass.
The text messages at issue are dated July 1, 2016, and address the “timing” of the infamous tarmac meeting between former President Bill Clinton and then Attorney General Loretta Lynch. That meeting took place on June 27, 2016 and has been seen as evidence of the Obama FBI and Department of Justice protecting Hillary Clinton from anything resembling a real investigation.
During his testimony before Congress on June 8, 2017, Comey said that the Clinton/Lynch tarmac meeting and Lynch’s instructions to refer to the Clinton probe as a “matter” and not an “investigation” influenced his decision not to recommend indIctment.
Since both Strzok and Page were involved in the “investigation” into Hillary Clinton’s illegal use of an unsecured, unauthorized, private e-mail server and account to send and receive at least 2,079 classified e-mails during her tenure as secretary of state, their text messages on the subject should carry more than a little weight — especially since these text messages were never intended to see the light of day.
The text messages between the two agents appear to indicate that — on July 1, 2016, four days after the meeting and four days before Comey’s recommendation against an indictment in the “matter” — they both already knew what the outcome would be. Referring to the tarmac meeting, Stzrok wrote, “Timing looks like hell.” Page replied, “Yeah, that is awful timing,” adding, “It's a real profile in couragw [sic], since she [Lynch] knows no charges will be brought.”
Given all of the evidence of both Clinton’s crimes and the skulduggery going on between the FBI and Department of Justice during the dog-and-pony show that was passed off to the American people as an investigation, it is apparent that there was a decision — made before all the facts were known and even before many key witnesses (including Clinton herself) were interviewed — to clear Clinton of any wrongdoing. As this writer said in an article about the order from Attorney General Jeff Sessions for the Department of Justice to investigate the FBI, the word for that is not “investigation,” it is “cover-up.”
These text messages add another layer to the already growing body of evidence that what Lynch called a “matter” and the FBI originally called an “investigation” was little more than a fix for Clinton. There will likely be more evidence of that as further revelation come to light.
_________________________________________________
 DOJ FBI Corruption Obama Hillary Clinton
 High-ranking Obama Administration hold-overs of the Deep State have surreptitiously planned to overthrow Donald Trump.
#ReleasetheMemo – Why Isn’t Mainstream Media Covering This Matter?
BY ROGER KATZ
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 
USA – With all the media buzz about the Government shutdown, the more pressing matter, by far, is this: Conspiratorial DOJ and FBI Officials and, perhaps, other high-ranking Obama Administration hold-overs of the Deep State have surreptitiously planned to overthrow Donald Trump. The odd thing is that this silent coup is still unfolding. It is unfolding, like a seemingly radiant—at least as presented to the public by Congressional Democrats—but clearly poisonous and deadly flower—and all of it with the passive, placid consent and connivance of mainstream media news organizations and outlets.
The House Intelligence Committee Memo, would, as House Intelligence Committee Republicans make plain, explain clearly the reprehensible, insidious conspiracy afoot, within this Country, to oust Donald Trump from Office.
We begin with this: the Fusion GPS Dossier, a work of fiction, concocted by ex-British spy, Christopher Steele, comprising uncorroborated, garbage meant to compromise Donald Trump—commissioned and paid for by Hillary Clinton and the DNC, which she controls, and which she had hoped would assure her victory in the 2016 U.S. Presidential election, and which now serves as the primary force behind Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation of collusion between Trump Campaign Officials and the Russian Government.
The Fusion GPS Dossier serves as the predicate basis for Special Counsel, Robert Mueller’s investigation of Donald Trump and his Campaign Officials. This Special Counsel, Robert Mueller, along with other Deep State Conspirators—whose names undoubtedly appear in the House Intelligence Committee Memo—seek, together, to take down Donald Trump. The Fusion GPS Dossier also serves a complementary purpose for these Conspirators. It serves, at one and the same time to draw attention away from Hillary Clinton and other likely criminals who worked for and who would have had jobs in Clinton’s Administration had she prevailed in the 2016 election. Now that she has lost the election, she remains vulnerable to a new investigation of her many criminal actions when she served as Secretary of State in the Obama Administration.
Obviously, Hillary Clinton, and the toadies and hangers-on who served her, along with mainstream news media organizations and Congressional Democrats—all of them—are furious that Hillary Clinton lost the election. What does this mean for the Country? Well, apart from the shattering of Clinton’s personal delusions of grandeur, we see, thankfully, an abrupt end to President Barack Obama’s domestic and foreign policy agenda. Hillary Clinton, as with Barack Obama before her, would have taken her cues from the secretive, ruthless, powerful, trans-nationalist, internationalist, globalist “elite” who seek to dismantle this Nation’s Constitution, and who intend to make the U.S. a vassal of a new world order, which the EU gives the American public some intimation of.
WHY DOES CONGRESS ALLOW THE SCAM OF THE MUELLER INVESTIGATION TO CONTINUE?
To date, after several months of “investigation” of collusion between Trump Campaign Officials and the Russian Government, Special Counsel, Robert Mueller, has come up with nothing, because there is nothing. Congressional Democrats, though, want the investigation to continue. In an obvious and blatant attempt to give the Mueller investigation an aura of respectability and to suggest that the Mueller probe constitutes something more than a rip-off to the American taxpayer, Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-California), “released,” ostensibly on her own, according to the liberal news media website, Politico, “the transcript of congressional investigators’ interview in August 2017 with Fusion GPS co-founder Glenn Simpson, whose firm was behind the controversial dossier alleging ties between President Donald Trump and Russians.”
Politico provides a link to the transcript. On perusal the transcript is nothing more than a compilation of bald, hearsay assertions that would not be admissible in a Court of law.
It is time to end the illegal farce of the Mueller investigation. Further, the American public should demand a renewed—and this time, true and proper—investigation of Hillary Clinton and of those toadies who have aided and abetted her, along with an investigation of the conspirators who orchestrated and who are even now systematically machinating behind the scenes, blatantly, smugly, continuing to carry out their detailed, despicable, diabolical operation to destroy the Trump Presidency and to undermine the will of the people of this Country.
In a renewed investigation of Hillary Clinton and her many henchmen, along with an investigation of those responsible for attempting to undermine the Trump Presidency, the Arbalest Quarrel demands that Attorney General Jeff Sessions appoint a new cadre of FBI agents and officials, and a new cadre of DOJ attorneys and officials—uncorrupted Americans, beyond reproach, unconnected with and untainted with the conspiracy to protect Hillary Clinton and unconnected with the conspiracy to destroy the U.S. President Donald Trump—to conduct these investigations.
SO, THEN, WHY AREN’T THE MAINSTREAM NEWSPAPERS REPORTING ON THIS FARCE AND DEMANDING, ON BEHALF OF THE AMERICAN CITIZENRY, A RELEASE OF THE CLASSIFIED HOUSE INTELLIGENCE MEMO THAT LAYS BARE THE INDIVIDUALS IN GOVERNMENT WHO, UNDER COLOR OF LAW, ARE USING THE POWER OF THEIR OFFICE IN THE DOJ AND FBI, AND, POSSIBLY, IN THE CIA AND NSA AS WELL, TO MACHINATE AND CONSPIRE TO DESTROY THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY AND, THEREIN, TO UNDERMINE THE WILL OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE WHO ELECTED DONALD TRUMP TO SET THIS COUNTRY ARIGHT: STRENGTHENING THIS COUNTRY’S BILL OF RIGHTS; ENSURING THIS NATION'S SYSTEM OF LAWS, THIS NATION'S CONSTITUTION, AND THAT THIS NATION'S JURISPRUDENCE ARE NEVER SUBORDINATED TO THOSE OF ANY OTHER NATION, PERSONS, OR LEGAL ENTITY; ENSURING THAT OUR CORE VALUES REMAIN IN PLACE AND THAT OUR NATION’S HISTORY IS NOT FORGOTTEN; SECURING OUR NATION’S BORDERS; PROTECTING OUR COUNTRY’S SMALL BUSINESSES AND WORKERS FROM THE EFFECTS OF RAMPANT GLOBALIZATION; PROTECTING THE SANCTITY OF THE INDIVIDUAL; AND KEEPING MEANINGFUL THE CONCEPT OF ‘CITIZEN’ THAT IS IN DANGER OF BEING ERODED AND DEGRADED THROUGH THE VERY EXISTENCE OF MILLIONS OF ILLEGAL ALIENS PRESENT WITHIN OUR BORDERS, ABSURDLY CLAIMING THEY HAVE A “RIGHT” TO REMAIN HERE?
One would think that The mainstream Press would be all over this. It isn’t. The left-wing mainstream New York Times, whose motto is “all the news that’s fit to print,” reports nothing. Of course, The New York Times, debasing the sacred protection afforded the Press, under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution allows itself to be used as a tool of—or, more likely, is itself complicit in—the coup attempt to oust a popularly elected U.S. President. So, the NY Times reports nothing.
Non-information—a veritable news blackout of critical events—is even more damaging to the maintenance of a free Republic than news distortion—i.e., reporting “fake” news, consisting of disinformation or misinformation, meant to deceive the public and to turn public attention toward trivial or irrelevant matters. Campaigns of deliberate deception, carried out by the Press through non-information, misinformation, and disinformation destroy a news organization’s credibility. To be sure, an astute reader may glean nuggets of truth even from misinformation or disinformation. But a total news blackout–a complete censoring of news–is a different sort of beast, as there is nothing to glean from a void in the news.
We would expect news blackouts in Countries ruled by totalitarian regimes, not in Democratic Republics. News blackouts occurring in a Free Republic, such as the U.S., are heinous. The mainstream news media hides behind the First Amendment, claiming to work on behalf of the American people. Not so! They abet conspirators who seek to overthrow a popularly elected leader of our Nation.
This is not the first time that a mainstream news organization, namely and specifically, The New York Times, hides news that is definitely fit to print. Indeed, it is the Times' new policy, now etched in stone, to keep their news reporters on a tight leash. The Arbalest Quarrel has recently written about the Times’ new gag order on its own reporters. See our article, titled, The Mainstream Media New York Times Newspaper’s New “Gag Order” Policy Prevents Its Employees From Exercising Their Right Of Free Speech Under The First Amendment To The U.S. Constitution.
We guess that no other mainstream newspaper has reported on this apparent diabolical coup attempt—an attempted coup d’Γ©tat of the Executive Branch of Government that is still unfolding, a matter more dangerous than the Watergate exposΓ© that the Washington Post had written extensively on. Where is the Washington Post now? We see just a smattering of this frightening and provocative news in that news publication. Apparently, neither the Washington Post nor The New York Times, and likely no other mainstream media newspaper considers the overthrow of a legitimate U.S. President—who wishes only to do his job to faithfully execute the laws of this Country in accordance with his Oath of Office and who seeks to strengthen the Bill of Rights—to amount to news that most mainstream media news organizations like The New York Times considers the kind of news that’s fit to bring to the attention of the American citizen.
Even conservative leaning Wall Street Journal, too, has nothing to say about the House Intelligence Committee Memo that Republican Congressmen, Matt Gaetz and Jim Jordan first brought to the attention of the American public in the last week’s Hannity broadcast. Gatekeepers of information obviously exist on both the “right” and “left” of the political spectrum. The American public is caught in the middle, deceived from this bastion of Democracy—this Fourth Estate—that claims to be the guardian of American Democracy. Instead, the Press, too, betrays the American people.
Why is that? Instead of discussing and investigating a despicable coup attempt of the Executive Branch of Government, these mainstream news media organizations dwell on the illicit Obama created programs, DACA (Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals) and DAPA (Deferred Action for Parents of Americans)—illegal schemes hatched by the Obama Administration to place this Nation in the very situation it faces today: what to do with 180,000 illegal aliens, along with their parents; and, for that matter, what to do with millions of other illegal aliens who do not belong here; never should have been here; should have been prevented from entering here; should have been removed from our Country years ago; and, that removal having been suspended, should certainly be removed from our Nation now as their very existence in this Country amounts to a slap-in-the-face of our naturalization laws and threatens the stability of the social, political, economic, legal and cultural fabric of this Nation.
THE ENDGAME OF OUR NATION IS UPON US
If DOJ and FBI conspirators succeed in this horrific coup attempt to upend the Trump Presidency, we will see further erosion of First Amendment free speech rights and the undermining of the Second Amendment. The Mueller investigation is, itself, in its very existence, an illegal and reprehensible attack on the unreasonable searches and seizures clause of the Fourth Amendment that should shock the conscience of all American citizens.
In Part three of this multi-series article, we look at plausible federal crimes these DOJ and FBI conspirators can feasibly be charged with—once their names—all of them—are known to the American people. For, these individuals constitute a far greater and graver threat to the well-being of this Country, and to its citizenry, and to its Constitution, than any threat emanating outside this Country. And, in further articles, we will continue discussing this critical matter until justice is meted out to those who have corrupted their Office, who exhibit disdain for our citizenry, who have stained our Constitution, and who threaten the very existence of our Republic.
Arbalest Quarrel
The Arbalest Quarrel calls on Congress to expose to the light of day, the rot that festers within the bowels of the Federal Government bureaucracy. Release the Memo now!
Please do your part. Tell Congress to release to the American public the House Intelligence Committee Memo that describes DOJ and FBI FISA Court abuses. The phone number to call is (202) 224-3121. That number will connect you to the U.S. Capitol switchboard. Follow the prompts to connect to U.S. Representatives and to U.S. Senators in your State.
 

3.5 MILLION ABORTIONS LATER, CECILE RICHARDS TO LEAVE PLANNED PARENTHOOD

 https://www.theblaze.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/planned-parenthood.png
3.5 MILLION ABORTIONS LATER, CECILE RICHARDS TO LEAVE PLANNED PARENTHOOD 
BY DAVE BOHON
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 
Top abortion advocate Cecile Richards (shown) plans to step down as the head of Planned Parenthood after 12 years at the helm of the nation's leading abortion provider, reported the Washington Post January 24.
While neither Richards nor Planned Parenthood has confirmed the news, a spokesperson for the abortion giant said that Richards planned to “to discuss 2018 and the next steps for Planned Parenthood’s future at the upcoming board meeting.”
The Post reported that rumors of Richards' retirement from the “non-profit” have been circulating through the liberal political world for several months, and according to “people with knowledge of the decision, there was talk before the 2016 election that if Hillary Clinton won the presidency, Richards was ready to move on.”
During Richard's tenure Planned Parenthood proudly ended the lives of over 300,000 pre-born babies every year — 3.5 million abortions in all. During that same time frame Planned Parenthood raked in billions of dollars in tax revenues.
The abortion giant's own annual report for 2016-17 shows that during that time it was responsible for 321,384 abortions while reaping $543.7 million in government subsidies — nearly 40 percent of the organization's $1.46 billion budget.
Additionally, during that reporting period abortions made up 96 percent of Planned Parenthood’s pregnancy services, while prenatal services, miscarriage care, and adoption referrals accounted for only four percent. In fact, for every adoption referral Planned Parenthood made during 2016, it performed more than 82 abortions.
Pro-life leader Troy Newman suggested that Richards departure may have been expedited by President Trump's aggressive stand against abortion compared to that of Obama, along with an ongoing investigation by the Department of Justice into Planned Parenthood practices.
“Planned Parenthood is under investigation by the Department of Justice for illegally trafficking in aborted baby remains and other crimes,” noted Newman, who heads the group Operation Rescue. “Could it be that Richards is getting out while she can, before indictments are handed down?”
David Daleiden of the Center for Medical Progress, the organizations whose investigation uncovered Planned Parenthood's harvesting of baby body tissue for sale, recalled that during her tenure “Cecile Richards was the most devoted practitioner of Planned Parenthood’s ‘out of sight, out of mind’ mantra to cover up their barbaric abortion business from the public. As Planned Parenthood faces federal criminal investigation from the FBI and DOJ for selling aborted baby hearts, lungs, livers, and brains, Richards’ departure shows that the old strategy is no longer working — the secret is out that Planned Parenthood is a taxpayer-sponsored crime syndicate of industrial-scale child killing, and even Cecile Richards can no longer put a friendly spin on it.”
With the nation having a pro-life president and increasing numbers of states passing legislation designed to protect the unborn and their mothers, “Planned Parenthood is swimming against the tide of history,” said Marjorie Dannenfelser of the pro-life organization Susan B. Anthony List. “Its public favor is on the wane as pro-life momentum is on the rise. Her successor is left with an impossible job: sell a scandal-laden, failing organization that ... provides pregnant women with prenatal care only 2.3 percent of the time.”
Putting a spiritual spin on Richards' impending departure from the abortion giant, Father Frank Pavone of Priests for Life commented, “I always say a prayer when someone like Cecile Richards has a change in her job, because it can be an opportunity for her to evaluate more clearly what she has been doing and why.” Pavone added, however, that the larger issue “is not the personnel who lead Planned Parenthood, but the corrupt and criminal enterprise that the organization itself is. Whoever serves it, in any capacity, is wounded and distorted in conscience. The whole enterprise needs to be closed.”
______________________________________________________
 Cecile Richards Announces Resignation From Planned Parenthood, But Says She’s 
‘Proud’ of Her Work 
BY HEATHER CLARK
 
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 WASHINGTON — Planned Parenthood President Cecile Richards announced on 
Friday that she is resigning from her position with the abortion and 
contraception giant, but in no way recanted her work with the organization.
Rather, Richards praised Planned Parenthood and spoke glowingly about the 12 years that she had spent leading the sexually-centered business.
“Twelve years ago, I joined Planned Parenthood to fight for a world where every woman can live her best life, and together, we’ve built a movement to protect reproductive health,” she said in a video statement. “And I could not be prouder.”
“From my first moment at Planned Parenthood, I have been in awe of our brave doctors, clinicians, staff and volunteers who provide care to one in five American women,” Richards said. “And to all of you who count on Planned Parenthood, know that this organization will be here for you, no matter where you live, how much money you make, who you love or where you come from.”

She claimed that Planned Parenthood has been an integral part of the country and has helped to save lives as rates for unintended pregnancy and abortion have fallen in recent years.
“Planned Parenthood has been a part of the fabric of this country for 100 years, and thanks to you, it will be here for 100 more,” Richards remarked. “… Planned Parenthood has helped tens of millions take control of their health and their futures providing birth control, pap smears, breast exams, STI testing and treatment, and safe and legal abortion.”
“Today, America is at a 30-year low for unintended pregnancies, and historic lows for abortion and teen pregnancy. This is one of the most important public health success stories in America’s history, and it would not have been possible without the life-changing and life-saving work of Planned Parenthood,” she asserted.

Richards stated that it was an “honor” to be both a patient and president of Planned Parenthood, and advised that she will be a “lifelong supporter and champion” of the organization’s purposes.
She has not yet advised what her plans are going forward, or why she decided to leave, other than remarking in an email, “[T]he time has come for me to move on to my next chapter—and for new voices to take the lead at Planned Parenthood.”
The Center for Medical Progress (CMP), which has been one of the most prominent opponents of Planned Parenthood—and exposed the organization’s practice of transferring the body parts of aborted babies to for-profit biomedical companies—opined that Richards’ announcement could signal problems within the organization.
“After CMP’s revealing undercover videos of Planned Parenthood’s top abortion doctors and the damning findings of multiple Congressional probes, Richards’ departure shows that the old strategy is no longer working as Planned Parenthood faces federal criminal investigation for selling aborted baby hearts, lungs, livers, and brains,” said director David Daleiden. “Planned Parenthood’s new leadership should commit to full transparency with the Department of Justice and with the public, and to ending this taxpayer-funded criminal abortion enterprise once and for all.”
As previously reported, according to its annual report, Planned Parenthood performed 321,384 abortions during the 2016-2017 fiscal year. Government funding was the largest source of revenue for the organization, as it received over $543 million in the year alone, down slightly from $554 million in 2015-2016. $532 million came from private contributions and grants. With all the sources of income combined, Planned Parenthood generated over $1.45 billion in revenue throughout the fiscal year.
Sanger’s newsletter “The Woman Rebel.”
And despite its expenditures, which included $75 million to “strengthen and secure Planned Parenthood,” $47 million for sexual education, and $40 million on public policy, the abortion giant still garnered a $98.5 million dollar profit, labeled as “excess of revenue,” up from $77 million the year prior and $58 million in 2014.
As previously reported, Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, who was a staunch advocate of eugenics, made a correlation between birth control and the purification of the races, referring to those with disabilities as being “morons,” “idiots” and “imbeciles.”
“Birth control itself, often denounced as a violation of natural law, is nothing more or less than the facilitation of the process of weeding out the unfit, of preventing the birth of defectives or of those who will become defectives,” she wrote in “Woman and the New Race.” “If we are to make racial progress, this development of womanhood must precede motherhood in every individual woman.”
“The emergency problem of segregation and sterilization must be faced immediately,” Sanger also contended in her publication “The Pivot of Civilization.” “Every feeble-minded girl or woman of the hereditary type, especially of the moron class, should be segregated during the reproductive period. Otherwise, she is almost certain to bear imbecile children, who in turn are just as certain to breed other defectives.”

SCHUMER WITHDRAWS OFFER TO FUND TRUMP'S BORDER WALL IN EXCHANGE FOR DACA DEAL

 WASHINGTON, DC - SEPTEMBER 6: Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) speaks at a news conference about President Donald Trump's decision to end the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program at the U.S. Capitol September 6, 2017 in Washington, DC. Democrats called for action on young undocumented immigrants that came to the U.S. as children who now could face deportation if Congress does not act. (Photo by Aaron P. Bernstein/Getty Images)
SCHUMER WITHDRAWS OFFER TO FUND TRUMP'S BORDER WALL IN EXCHANGE FOR DACA DEAL
BY WARREN MASS
 
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) sent a message to the White House through an aide on January 22, informing President Trump that he was retracting the offer he made on January 19 to approve more than $1.6 billion for construction of a wall along the southern border with Mexico. 
Schumer “took it off,” Senator Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), the assistant Democratic leader said on January 23. “He called the White House yesterday and said it’s over.”
The offer was made during negotiations to end a government shutdown by approving a temporary funding measure through February 8. Senators voted 81-18 on January 22 to pass the temporary funding measure in exchange for assurances from Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) to work on a deal to grant legal status to roughly 700,000 youthful aliens protected under the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program.
“The wall offer is off the table,” Schumer told reporters on January 23. “That was part of a package” that’s now defunct.
“It was the first thing the president and I talked about. The thought was that we could come to an agreement that afternoon [of the 19th], the president would announce his support, and the Senate and the House would get it done and it would be on the president’s desk,” Schumer continued. “He didn’t do that. So we’re going to have to start on a new basis and so the wall offer is off the table.”
Later that day, Trump responded by tweeting: “Cryin’ Chuck Schumer fully understands, especially after his humiliating defeat, that if there is no Wall, there is no DACA. We must have safety and security, together with a strong Military, for our great people!”
Trump also tweeted that day: “Nobody knows for sure that the Republicans & Democrats will be able to reach a deal on DACA by February 8, but everyone will be trying....with a big additional focus put on Military Strength and Border Security. The Dems have just learned that a Shutdown is not the answer!”
USA Today reported that the White House provided a different account of the January 19 meeting, stating that Schumer offered legislative approval for the wall, but not actual funding.
Hogan Gidley, a White House spokesman, said on January 23 that the Schumer offer “never existed.” “You can’t rescind money you never really offered in the first place,” Gidley said on Fox News.
Senator Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) disputed Schumer’s recollection of the meeting wherein the border wall offer was discussed. “They claim that some crazy deal was made,” Cotton said of Democrats. “And then when we say no deal was made, they accuse Republicans and the president of reneging.”
After the talks between the president and the Senate minority leader broke down, the Senate rejected a short-term spending bill, creating a partial government shutdown. Senate Democrats voted against the measure because it did not include protections for the “Dreamers,” young people brought into the country by illegal-alien parents, who now have temporary legal status under the Obama-era DACA program.
A report from NPR noted that last week, White House Chief of Staff John Kelly told a caucus of Hispanic lawmakers that he had persuaded the president that his long-promised border wall was unnecessary. As a candidate, Kelly said, Trump was not “fully informed” of the border situation when he pledged to build the wall and since then, the president's views on the subject had “evolved.”
The chief of staff reiterated those same points during an interview on Fox News, NPR reported.
With Republicans holding a slim majority in the Senate (51 out of 100 senators), one may wonder why all of these extensive negotiations are necessary in order to approve a budget. It is true that not every Republican was on board with the recent budget deal. In a recent article, we quoted Senator Rand Paul’s explanation for why he could not vote for the continuing resolution: “I’m just not voting to exceed the spending caps, and I’m not voting for $700 billion deficits annually.” However, even if the budget bill could have been improved to the point where Paul and two other Republicans who were opposed to it could have voted for it, Democrats still would have been able to sustain a filibuster to stop it.
Under current Senate rules, a majority of 51 senators is not enough to pass legislation that the minority party wants to filibuster. It is for this reason that journalist Art Harman contributed an opinion article to The Hill on January 24 in which he raised the following points:
Why on earth is the Senate minority leader in the loop at all in a Republican Senate, much less effectively sitting in the driver’s seat? It’s because of the charred remnants of the old Senate tradition, still called the “filibuster,” long after the requirement to demonstrate rhetorical stamina was eliminated.
Until the rules were changed in 1970, use of the filibuster was incredibly rare, but today, every bill is effectively held hostage to a 60-vote majority found nowhere in the Constitution. The effect has been to neuter the Senate and thereby the House. To force Republicans to write bills for Senator Schumer’s approval rather than for Americans who want to secure our border, restore our nation’s defense, bring home our jobs and repeal and replace ObamaCare.
After providing several examples of how the filibuster has obstructed the Trump administration’s efforts to accomplish its objectives, including eliminating ObamaCare and obtaining Senate confirmation for some of Trump’s appointees, Harman observed:
There’s lots of talk about a return to regular order and passing real budgets, but as long as the legislative filibuster survives, there is little chance we will ever see anything but perpetual continuing resolutions.
Harman noted that had not the Senate eliminated the filibuster for votes on Supreme Court nominees, Neil Gorsuch would never have been confirmed as an associate justice on the U.S. Supreme Court. (Gorsuch’s nomination received 54 votes of approval.)
Harman quoted one of Trump’s tweets expressing support for exercising what is called “the nuclear option” (eliminating the filibuster): If the “stalemate continues, Republicans should go 51% (Nuclear Option) and vote on real, long-term budget, no C.R.s!”
The article concluded by admonishing members of Congress: “If the Senate ends the legislative filibuster, Congress had better pass a budget that includes full funding for the wall, and then pass actual budgets by September 30 in regular order.”

Related articles:
Government Shutdown Ends — This Time Democrats Blinked!
Rand Paul Explains Why He Won't Vote to Extend Government Funding
“Bill of Love”: Trump’s Ongoing Effort to Strike Deal With Democrats for DACA Recipients
Trump and Democrats Working on Deal Over Future of DACA Recipients Before Program Expires
Trump Letter to Congress Outlines Immigration Plan, but Is Open to “Reform” of DACA Recipients’ Status
DHS Assistant Secretary Says Administration Supports Allowing “Dreamers” to Stay
Trump’s Apparent Willingness to Preserve DACA Disturbs His Conservative Base

SESSIONS ORDERS INVESTIGATION OF FBI; PROMISES "APPROPRIATE LEGAL DISCIPLINARY ACTION"

SESSIONS ORDERS INVESTIGATION OF FBI; PROMISES 
"APPROPRIATE LEGAL DISCIPLINARY ACTION" 
BY C. MITCHELL SHAW
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 
As a result of the FBI failing to preserve text messages between two senior FBI agents who appear to have worked to protect Hillary Clinton during the “investigation” into her e-mail scandal, Attorney General Jeff Sessions ordered the Justice Department on Monday to investigate the FBI.
The missing texts are from a crucial five-month period covering both the presidential transition and the beginning of the Mueller probe. Both of the agents — Peter Strzok and his mistress, Lisa Page — were involved in both the Clinton investigation and the Mueller probe. While those five months of text messages are “missing,” another 50,000 messages between the two have been found that show — among other things:
The couple was part of a “secret society” of highly placed people in both the FBI and the Department of Justice.
• That “secret society” is working against President Trump.
• Strzok texted Page about “an insurance policy” to get rid of Trump if he were elected.
• Both Strzok and Page were “pressured” to “wrap up” the Clinton investigation as soon as it became apparent that Trump would secure the GOP nomination.
• Strzok and Page appear to have known ahead of time that Comey would not recommend indictment against Clinton.
The attorney general’s order to launch this investigation comes amidst a plethora of other similar investigations. This investigation will focus on the FBI’s failure to preserve the text messages, which are seen as evidence in an already ongoing investigation into the FBI’s mishandling of the Clinton e-mail investigation. In that investigation, there appears to have been a decision — before all the facts were known and even before many key witnesses (including Clinton herself) were interviewed — to clear Clinton of any wrongdoing. There is a word for that. It is not “investigation.” It is “cover-up.”
In his statement about the investigation, Sessions said that his office is determined to recover the missing text messages and to “confirm with certainty” why they “are not now available.” That statement said, in part:
We will leave no stone unturned to confirm with certainty why these text messages are not now available to be produced and will use every technology available to determine whether the missing messages are recoverable from another source.
His statement also made it clear that those responsible will be held accountable and that “if any wrongdoing” is discovered, “appropriate legal disciplinary action” will be taken. From that statement:
I have spoken to the Inspector General and a review is already underway to ascertain what occurred and to determine if these records can be recovered in any other way. If any wrongdoing were to be found to have caused this gap, appropriate legal disciplinary action measures will be taken.
The New American previously reported that the text messages that are known reveal the existence of a “secret society” that both Strzok and Page belong to. That “secret society” is comprised of highly placed people in both the FBI and Department of Justice and works against President Trump. Leading Republicans are demanding action to uncover that “secret society.”
Besides the demands of leading Republicans and the new investigation ordered by Sessions, there is also the four-page memo circulated among the House of Representatives showing systemic abuses of of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA). Again, leading Republicans — who could not discuss the specifics of the memo, because it is classified — have led the charge, demanding that the memo be made public. They say that if it is made public, government officials will “go to jail.”
All of these revelations connect — in one way or another — to the Trump/Russia collusion narrative put forth by leading Democrats that is responsible for the probe led by Special Counsel Robert Mueller. That probe — and the lies on which it stands — are coming unraveled as more information comes to light.
Even Strzok — who held a lead role in the Mueller probe — admitted he does not believe there is anything to the allegations of Trump/Russia collusion. In a text message to Page in May 2017, he wrote that he was hesitant to join the probe because “you and I both know the odds are nothing.”
The outcome of these multiple investigations may help finally prove that.