Translate

Thursday, August 23, 2018

FOR SPITE: POLICE STATE NEW JERSEY GOVERNOR ENDS PUBLIC LAND BEAR HUNTING~IF RESTRICTING GUNS & AMMO, LIMITING FISH CATCHES ISN'T ENOUGH, THEN RESTRICT HUNTING TOO!

FOR SPITE: POLICE STATE NEW JERSEY GOVERNOR ENDS PUBLIC LAND BEAR HUNTING 
BY DUNCAN JOHNSON
SEE: https://www.ammoland.com/2018/08/new-jersey-governor-ends-public-land-bear-hunting/#axzz5P0hShp8Rrepublished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:

New Jersey –-(Ammoland.com)- Fulfilling a campaign promise to the best of his ability, newly elected Gov. Philip Murphy has ended black bear hunting by executive order on all state-controlled public lands in New Jersey.
The order stops short of an outright ban on bear hunting in the Garden State only because, as stated in the order, the governor doesn’t possess the power to do so. That power resides with the New Jersey Fish and Game Council, which has authorized black bear hunting for the last eight years and through 2021.
“This is pure political pandering at its finest. Gov. Murphy knows that the wildlife experts in his own agencies use the best available science and practices when evaluating wildlife populations and setting hunting regulations,” said Evan Heusinkveld, president and CEO of the Sportsmen’s Alliance. “This backdoor attempt to undermine scientific wildlife management is a slap in the face to those biologists, presents a clear and present danger to New Jersey’s citizens and, ultimately, hurts the entire population of bears.”
Dense is the best way to describe New Jersey. It is the most densely populated state in the country with approximately 9 million citizens, and is estimated to have the densest population of black bears with surveys topping 3,500 bears in just the northern portion of the state.
With a robust population of black bears and such a large population of people, sightings, conflicts and attacks have taken place regularly in New Jersey – including the death of a student in 2014.
In his executive order, Gov. Murphy admits that neither his office nor the Commissioner of Environmental Protection have the power to unilaterally alter or cancel a hunt, something that has been upheld several times in court.
Instead, Gov. Murphy invokes safety on public lands as the motivation to end the hunt, even though all research affirms that hunting remains one of the safest activities millions of people engage in every year.
“New Jersey laws, court decisions and 100 years of wildlife management science all attest to how flawed Gov. Murphy’s logic is, and so he’s wielding the only political power he has been able to muster, and that is to discriminate against and attack the public-lands hunter via an executive order,” said Heusinkveld. “Millions of people depend on public lands in this country, and this is a perfect example of why so many sportsmen fear the transfer of federal lands to state ownership.”
The Sportsmen’s Alliance is evaluating its legal options to protect New Jersey sportsmen, public-land hunters, state biologists and scientific wildlife management.

About the Sportsmen’s Alliance:Sportsmen’s Alliance
The Sportsmen’s Alliance protects and defends America’s wildlife conservation programs and the pursuits – hunting, fishing and trapping – that generate the money to pay for them. Sportsmen’s Alliance Foundation is responsible for public education, legal defense and research. Its mission is accomplished through several distinct programs coordinated to provide the most complete defense capability possible. Stay connected to Sportsmen’s Alliance: Online, Facebook, Twitter and Instagram.
_______________________________________________________________
Governor Murphy has banned bear hunting on public lands in New Jersey but not everyone agrees with this decision. Bill talks with Jeff Tittel of the New Jersey Sierra Club and Cody McLaughlin of NJ Outdoor Alliance to hear both sides of the argument.



QUEBEC, CANADA: WOMAN CALLS OUT TRUDEAU FOR COST OF HIS IMMIGRATION POLICIES; TRUDEAU CALLS HER RACIST

$146 MILLION OF TAXPAYER MONIES 
WENT TO IMMIGRANTS
PUBLICLY SHAMES QUEBEC WOMAN
QUEBEC, CANADA: WOMAN CALLS OUT TRUDEAU FOR COST OF HIS IMMIGRATION POLICIES; TRUDEAU CALLS HER RACIST 
BY ROBERT SPENCER
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Of course. Why else besides racism would anyone oppose 
mass Muslim migration? That’s actually how the Left 
thinks, including this cardboard Canadian Prime Minister.
THE BACKLASH:




"GO FUND ME" CANCELS ROBERT SPENCER'S WITHDRAWAL OF FUNDS, REFUNDS DONATIONS WITHOUT EXPLANATION~BOYCOTT NOW!

BOYCOTT NOW!
"GO FUND ME" CANCELS ROBERT SPENCER'S WITHDRAWAL OF FUNDS, REFUNDS DONATIONS WITHOUT EXPLANATION 
BY ROBERT SPENCER
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
After Patreon banned me without explanation, I set up a GoFundMe account, with the same goal in view of constructing a studio for Jihad Watch videos, and quickly raised over $3,000. Yesterday I withdraw it, and got a notice from GoFundMe:
Hi Robert,
We are sending $3,299.42 to your bank account. Deposits take 2 – 5 business days to appear in your bank account. If your deposit doesn’t arrive after 5 business days, contact us.
But today, I got this:
Hi Robert,
We’re sorry, but we have canceled your 08/21 withdrawal of $3,299.42 from WePay Payments.
The funds from this withdrawal have been added back to your balance.
Thank you for your understanding and we apologize for the trouble this may have caused.
If you have any questions or require additional assistance please let us know by responding directly to this email.
Thank you, WePay Team
I also got multiple notices from GoFundMe; each informed me that a particular donation to me from a particular person had been refunded.
When I asked for a reason why they had canceled my withdrawal and were refunding all the donations to me, they did not, of course, answer.
In reading histories of the Third Reich I was always struck by how quickly — in just a matter of months — Germany went from being a free, democratic state to an authoritarian dictatorship, right under everyone’s noses in 1933. I always marveled at how fast and easy it was to destroy freedom. I don’t marvel any more. It is happening to us right now, and most people neither notice nor care. The authoritarian Left is stamping out all dissenting voices. It will soon be even worse: people who don’t hold the accepted opinions will not be able to hold jobs, have bank accounts, buy from various outlets, etc. Think this is hysterical and will never happen here? Watch.
What amazes me further is that so many people are crowing about this, tweeting happily at me that I’m getting what I deserve for not believing Islam is a religion of peace, and all that. They don’t seem to realize that a pattern has now been set in motion that could turn on them just as easily as it has turned on me.
These times call for courage, and yet this is an age of universal cowardice. It is unlikely to end well.
______________________________________________________________

GoFundMe falsely accuses Robert Spencer of violating Terms of Service, allows no appeal

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
This morning, GoFundMe first notified me that they were sending me the remaining $600 of the $3300 in donations I had received; they had canceled the rest and refunded the donors. Then they canceled that payout and sent me this:
It seems you’re using WePay for one or more of the activities prohibited by our Terms of Service. Unfortunately, you can’t use WePay to accept additional payments. Any pending payments will be canceled and you won’t be able to withdraw funds at this time.
More specifically:
WePay is unable to process payments related to Hate, violence, racial intolerance, terrorism, the financial exploitation of a crime, or items or activities that encourage, promote, facilitate, or instruct others regarding the same.
Thank you for understanding and we apologize that we couldn’t offer a better solution.
Sincerely, WePay Team
There was, of course, no further explanation.
It’s very clear what’s going on. The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) claims that I am a “hate group leader,” and that’s that. The SPLC’s infallibility in such matters is taken for granted by all these social media giants, despite its massive admission of error in the Maajid Nawaz case, and its obvious far-Left political agenda in lumping legitimate groups in with the likes of the KKK and neo-Nazis in order to discredit and destroy them.
But GoFundMe, like Patreon and MasterCard, allow no appeal, no discussion, no questioning of the SPLC’s fiat. And of course, it isn’t just the SPLC; it is now taken for granted by large segments of the American population, and by innumerable people elsewhere, that to oppose jihad mass murder of innocent civilians and Sharia oppression of women, gays, and others is “hate,” or as GoFundMe puts it, “Hate” with a capital H. I remember how flabbergasted I was in 2003 when I was on MSNBC with Keith Olbermann and Ibrahim Hooper of Hamas-linked CAIR, and Hooper called me a “hatemonger.” I thought, “It’s ‘hate’ to oppose jihad terror? That will never fly.”
But it has. And the outcome will be that more and more people will be afraid to oppose jihad terror and Sharia oppression, for fear of incurring these charges, and this discrimination and libel.
I’m going to be doing what I can to challenge GoFundMe’s uncritical acceptance of the SPLC’s smear of me, and the likely same uncritical acceptance by MasterCard/Patreon. But the SPLC has hundreds of millions of dollars and I don’t. And many who don’t realize how vulnerable they are will applaud what is happening to me because they don’t realize or believe how easily the same tactics can and will be turned on them. But they will be.
I did ask GoFundMe why they had done this, and I got this back:
Vanessa
Aug 22, 9:20 AM PDT
@GFMThis account has been refunded and blacklisted with the following message: WePay is unable to process payments related to Hate, violence, racial intolerance, terrorism, the financial exploitation of a crime, or items or activities that encourage, promote, facilitate, or instruct others regarding the same.
WePay | Trust & Safety
More questions? Check out our Help Center https://support.wepay.com
So I wrote this back to Vanessa:
But I don’t do any of those things. On what grounds are you accusing me of this? I don’t spread hate or encourage violence or intolerance or terrorism, etc. I don’t do any of these things. On what basis are you claiming that I do?
I don’t expect an answer to that.
_______________________________________________________________
NOT THE ONLY ONE: 

Brittany Pettibone GoFundMe Story

CALLED A "WHITE NATIONALIST", "ALT-RIGHT" CONSERVATIVE, "VIOLATES TERMS OF SERVICE"

CENSORED: Youtube Bans me, Gofundme Bans 

me, New York Times Comes after me, 

And what we can do

ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN SENTENCES 12 CHRISTIANS TO PRISON FOR HOUSE CHURCH, EVANGELISM

ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN SENTENCES 
12 CHRISTIANS TO PRISON FOR 
HOUSE CHURCH, EVANGELISM
BY ROBERT SPENCER
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
This is what actual bigotry and intolerance looks like. But in the West, the guardians of acceptable opinion will say nothing about this, hit Trump for being mean to the poor old mullahs, and excoriate those who report on this for alleged bigotry and intolerance.
“Iran Sentences 12 Christians to Year in Prison for House Church Worship, Evangelism,” by Samuel Smith, Christian Post, August 21, 2018:
An Iranian court has sentenced 12 Christians to one year in prison for holding worship meetings and evangelizing — crimes that Iran considers to be “propaganda activities.”
The Iranian Christian news agency Mohabat News reports that a Christian convert known as Payam Kharaman and 11 other Christians who were arrested in Bushehr in April 2015 were sentenced for the crime of promoting what the Iranian authorities call Zionist propaganda that goes against the Islamic Republic’s Shia Muslim-controlled system.
Kharaman told the news outlet that he and the others were accused of the crimes because they held house worship meetings, evangelized and invited others to accept Christ as their Savior. Additionally, the Christians were charged with “inclination to the land of Christianity.”
The verdict was handed down by the Islamic Revolutionary Court of Bushehr headed by Judge Abbas Asgari. Two others who were sentenced along with Kharaman were Shapour Jozi, Parastoo Zariftash.
Although Mohabat first reported the verdict earlier this month, the sentence was handed down in late June.
Kharaman explained that the state pressure against him began as early as 2012 when he was repeatedly summoned by the Office of Police Monitory Public Place in Bushehr. Kharaman said that he was interrogated about his evangelism and communications outside the country. Kharaman stated that interrogators wanted a confession that he was speaking abroad to Americans, Britains or Israelis.
“I always insisted on the belief in Christianity for myself and not for promotion of Christianity,” Kharaman was quoted as saying. “Because I had a boutique shop in Bushehr, a number of officers’ family members in the office knew me and informed of heavy sentences against me, and the case which was under investigation by intelligence office. I thought it was just an empty threat, but unfortunately became a serious issue one or two years later.”
Kharaman recalled that three security agents stormed his home with a warrant on April 7, 2015. After searching for about two hours, the agents seized his computer, cell phone, CDs, books and memory cards. Kharaman said that he was taken to an intelligence office and interrogated once again….

ISLAMIC TERRORISM WILL END-WHEN ISLAM HAS CONQUERED THE WORLD

ISLAMIC TERRORISM WILL END-
WHEN ISLAM HAS CONQUERED THE WORLD 
BY MATEEN ELASS
SEE: https://mateenelass.wordpress.com/2018/08/22/islamic-terrorism-will-end-when-islam-has-conquered-the-world/republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Will Islamic terrorism end any time soon?
No.
Here’s why:
  1. Allah commands his followers to fight until the world is subdued under Islam.
  2. He promises them victory (with supernatural help) even when the odds are stacked against them.
  3. He lures jihadis with visions of eternal rewards replete with virgins galore and sensual pleasures beyond measure.
  4. He threatens the punishment of hellfire for Muslims who don’t “walk the talk,” who claim to be faithful but shrink from fighting and dying for Allah.
  5. He reassures Muslims that the kuffar (unbelievers) deserve death because they will roast in hell for eternity, hated by Allah; Muslims therefore, should have no pangs of conscience for dispatching them to their eternal destiny post-haste.
One would think in light of this that Muslim armies would be rising up all over the world, trusting in the promises of Allah, to engage and defeat the forces of the infidel West, as well as the Communist world, the countries of Africa and Central/South America. After all, the Qur’an (Allah’s inerrant word) says:
“O Prophet, urge the believers to battle. If there are among you twenty [who are] steadfast, they will overcome two hundred. And if there are among you one hundred [who are] steadfast, they will overcome a thousand of those who have disbelieved because they are a people who do not understand.” (8:65)
In the next verse, Allah ratchets down the odds, recognizing that the Muslims are weak even with his angelic help:
“Now, Allah has lightened [the hardship] for you, and He knows that among you is weakness. So if there are from you one hundred [who are] steadfast, they will overcome two hundred. And if there are among you a thousand, they will overcome two thousand by permission of Allah. And Allah is with the steadfast.” (8:66).
Nevertheless, the Muslims are to fight under Muhammad and his generals, expecting victory even against stronger forces. And indeed, in the first major battle the Muslims fought against the unbelievers of Mecca, they were outnumbered at least two to one, and earned a convincing victory. Feeling that Allah was certainly on their side, they bought into the idea they were invincible. Until the next battle. The Meccans returned to Medina the next year better prepared, and inflicted serious losses on Muhammad’s army. Many believers were shaken by the fact that Allah had not given them victory, and wondered if Islam was a sham. But Allah soon revealed through his prophet that they had not succeeded for two reasons: 1) he was testing their resolve; and 2) among their ranks were numbers of hypocrites (whose hearts were not in fighting, and who refused to engage the enemy). Only if his army showed itself fully committed to him would he assure them victory.
This same perspective has given rise to modern Islamic “radicalism” or reformation (i.e., a return to the faithful beliefs and practices of the original Muslim community under Muhammad). When the last Caliphate fell into the dustbin of history (the Ottoman Empire, which was dismembered in 1924), some Muslim intellectuals began to ask why the non-Muslim world was now calling the shots, and the Muslim world supine and feeble before them. Their answer: we have drifted from our center; we are not truly committed to Allah and his prophet; but if we return to serious obedience, Allah will once again grant us supernatural help to regain our position of superiority in the world. From this mindset, the Muslim Brotherhood was founded in Egypt in 1928 and its movement spawned like-minded organizations around the Muslim world. The radical and terrorist organizations we see today are the fruit of this perspective.
So once again the world is faced with a resurgent Islam whose goal is to rule the human race. But Muslims by and large are not ignorant of the huge discrepancy between their relatively meager military resources and the vast destructive capabilities of the technologically advanced US armed forces together with its allies, not to mention atheistic China and Russia who also would swat down any frontal assaults by Muslim armies. Recognizing this, Muslim countries are biding their time, buying weaponry and technology, seeking as rapidly as possible to achieve parity with infidel superpowers.
The Islamic Republic of Iran is a perfect case in point. The fastest way to challenge Western power is to become a cardholder in the nuclear missile club, so Iran has worked hard in secret to develop that capability, while not neglecting their conventional armament upgrades. For example, yesterday the theocracy announced they were unveiling the “first 100% indigenously made” fighter jet, named “the Kowsar” (Kawthar, in Arabic). The name is significant, for it is the title of a short chapter of the Qur’an containing this promise from Allah:
“Indeed, your enemy is the one cut off.” (108:3)
Western military experts report that the Kowsar appears to be a remake of the USA’s F-5 fighter, numbers of which were shipped to Iran in the mid-1970s when Iran under the Shah was an ally. Even with massive upgrades imagined, such a jet would be no match for most modern air forces today.
But Iran’s tactics in announcing this new addition to its armaments is instructive of the general Muslim mindset when it comes to enemies who have superior forces. It turns to boasting and bluster as an attempt to plant doubt into the minds of those it considers its enemies as a ploy to dissuade them from mounting an attack which it rightly fears would bring overwhelming defeat. So, Iran’s President Rouhani declared, “Why does the US not attack us? Because it is aware of our power and the cost [that it will entail].”
Everyone recalls Saddam Hussein’s warnings to the Coalition Forces gathering before Desert Storm that if attacked Iraq would unleash the “mother of all battles” and inflict huge losses on its enemies. His bluster was quite convincing to the military layman, backed up as it was with reports that Iraq had the world’s fourth largest standing army at the time. But after 42 days of aerial bombardment of Iraq’s military and civilian infrastructure, the ground offensive to defeat the Iraqi army lasted only 100 hours. It was indeed a massive display of “shock and awe” which all who witnessed, including the Muslim world, have not forgotten. So, while not wanting to go face to face with infidel armies, radical Muslim governments and insurgent groups shake their fists at the West and continue their bluster, hoping to cower a vastly superior enemy.
But there is another strategy as well, known among military thinkers as “asymmetric warfare,” and defined well by the Encyclopedia Britannica as:
unconventional strategies and tactics adopted by a force when the military capabilities of belligerent powers are not simply unequal but are so significantly different that they cannot make the same sorts of attacks on each other.
This includes things like guerilla warfare, and the many tactics of terrorism: assassinations, hijackings, kidnappings, suicide bombings, civilian attacks and so on. Lt. Gen. H.R. McMaster astutely commented on this matter that “There are only two ways to fight the US: stupidly [conventionally] or asymmetrically.”
Because the Muslim world understands itself to be no match with the West today in a face-to-face war (despite Allah’s promises), and because it seeks to walk in the shoes of its prophet Muhammad who said, “War is deceit” (Bukhari, Vol. 4, Book 52, Hadith 268) and “I have been made victorious through terror [cast into the hearts of the enemy]” (Bukhari,  Vol. 4, Book 52, Hadith 220), the predominant warfare strategy of jihadis today is that of terrorism. Their hope is that this strategy will weaken both the resolve and resources of the infidel world, until that day when either the West collapses from within or the Muslim world has grown strong enough to challenge and defeat the West militarily.
Until that day, which all who love freedom hope never comes, Islamic terrorism will remain the primary strategy of the jihadi movement within Islam. In my opinion, “moderate Islam” offers no hope of ending this evil virus which lives deep in the heart of Allah, Muhammad and the Qur’an.
A

SENATOR RON WYDEN DEMANDS “CONSEQUENCES” FOR PLATFORMS THAT DON’T “REMOVE PEOPLE LIKE ALEX JONES”

VIDEO:
Senator Ron Wyden is proposing legislation to censor patriots from the internet that could affect thousands of conservatives now, but many others in the future as well.
SENATOR RON WYDEN DEMANDS “CONSEQUENCES” FOR PLATFORMS THAT DON’T “REMOVE PEOPLE LIKE ALEX JONES”

Dem lawmaker intensifies censorship effort

BY PAUL JOSEPH WATSON
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Democratic Senator Ron Wyden is trying to take online censorship to a new level by drafting a bill that will enforce “consequences” for platforms that refuse to remove people like Alex Jones.
In an interview with Recode, Wyden, the senior U.S. Senator from Oregon, said that platforms should be punished for hosting content that he deems to go against “common decency”.
“I think what the Alex Jones case shows, we’re gonna really be looking at what the consequences are for just leaving common decency in the dust,” said Wyden.
“What I’m gonna be trying to do in my legislation is to really lay out what the consequences are when somebody who is a bad actor, somebody who really doesn’t meet the decency principles that reflect our values, if that bad actor blows by the bounds of common decency, I think you gotta have a way to make sure that stuff is taken down,” he added.
Of course, Wyden’s definition of what is ‘indecent’ is wide open to interpretation and will obviously be skewed by political bias.
“If we were talking about really horrible pornography, I think they would have moved pretty quickly to deal with it,” added the Senator. “I think it’s also worth noting that, with respect to Alex Jones, there are probably a thousand accounts out there that are as bad as Alex Jones.”
According to Jones, Wyden’s rhetoric represents an intensification of efforts to purge his content from existence entirely, with the next step being the removal of Jones from nationwide radio airwaves.
______________________________________________________________

Sen. Ron Wyden Calls To Ban "Thousands" 

Like Alex Jones


Published on Aug 22, 2018

Democrat Sen. Ron Wyden calls to ban thousands like Alex Jones. Who died and made Sen. Wyden hall monitor? Understand that this is being done by a duly elected U.S. Senator. So Alex Jones was only the first, (with thousands to follow) to be banned from all social platforms. This is still America! That Sen. Wyden and other Democrat Senators want to do is a China-like censorship of all dissenting voices. Even if Alex Jones questioned Sandy Hook, are we to believe that no one can question the “official narrative” by the Corporate Media? This is a modern day book burning in America. Make no mistake, this is an attempt to overthrow the 2016 election of President Donald J. Trump. NOTICE, ANTIFA is allowed to attack prayer meetings with nothing being said by the Corporate Media. Black Lives Matter only speaks up when a black person is killed by the white police officer. But when 3000 black people are murdered by other blacks across America, Black Lives Matter fall silent. Google, Facebook, Twitter, and Apple allow groups like BLM and ANTIFA to spread hate and promote violence while at the same time attempting to silence any and all conservative voices. Mark my words, in the not so distance future, our churches and Christian Universities and Christian bookstores will be condemned and attacked for being nothing more than ancient institutions that promote hate speech.
_______________________________________________________________

2011 Nazism: Wyden Defends Obama's Net Neutrality 

(Which Was Actually Censorship)

LIES, DISTORTIONS & LOSS OF FREE SPEECH,
ALL IN THE NAME OF "DECENCY"