Translate

Thursday, November 15, 2018

MIGRANTS CLIMB WALL AT MEXICO-U.S. BORDER

MIGRANTS CLIMB WALL AT MEXICO-U.S. BORDER
  Migrant caravan groups begin arriving at US border
 U.S. Customs and Border Patrol director Pete Flores on what systems are in place to prepare for incoming migrants.
 Migrant Caravan First Wave Of Illegal Immigrants Reach US-Mexico Border

A POPULATION CAPABLE OF USING & OPERATING FIREARMS IS NECESSARY~RED FLAG LAW GONE BAD & BULLET ORDINANCES

A POPULATION CAPABLE OF USING & OPERATING FIREARMS IS NECESSARY
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:

USA – -(AmmoLand.com)- All too often the anti-gun left in America says that the 2nd amendment does not say what it means. They say “regulated” means to be controlled by the Government that the National Guard is the militia. Nothing could be further from the truth.
“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”
So – How did George Washing describe the militia?
“…. Men just dragged from the tender Scenes of domestic life; unaccustomed to the din of Arms; totally unacquainted with every kind of military skill, which being followed by a want of confidence in themselves, when opposed to Troops regularly trained, disciplined, and appointed, superior in knowledge and superior in Arms, makes them timid, and ready to fly from their own shadows … ~ (Weatherup, Roy G.: Standing Armies and the Armed Citizens: An Historical Analysis of the Second Amendment. Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly (Fall 1975), 973)”
Hmmm… It doesn’t sound like the National Guard now does it? Ok, so it DOES seem like the French Army though. The definition of the militia from the 18th century is all able-bodied citizens between the ages of 17 and 45.
Regulated – does not mean controlled, it is about military operations being drilled and prepared.
Or we could again read a quote from George Washington:
“The distinction between a well-regulated army and a mob is the good order and discipline of the first, and the licentious and disorderly behavior of the latter.”
Hummmm… sure seem to meet the definition of drilled and prepared.
So if we translate the ORIGINAL writing of the 2nd Amendment with modern words that match the intent of the founders we get this.

“Having a population capable of using and operating firearms is necessary for the security of the free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.”

So the 2nd amendment means what it says if you don’t play word games with it.
To illustrate it further let's replace the word arms with books. Please consider the following:
“A well EDUCATED populace being necessary for the security of the free state, the right of the people to keep and read books shall not be infringed.”
Ohhhh… Some books are too dangerous for you to own, we must ban them. (I’m sure Facebook would agree!) We should ban ALL books so that you only learn what the elite want you to know. While the left may now agree there is a lot of correlation here, one you should pay attention too when you see how your rights are being affected.
In 1850 you could give a slave a gun to hunt for food if you taught a slave to read you would be hung. Knowledge and free speech have always been the real source of power.
As for “The People.” The same men who wrote the 2nd amendment also wrote all the other amendments. So, if “The People” in one amendment refers to only those in the military does that mean that only those who have served have the right to free speech?. As a kid, we all read Starship Trooper or saw the movie. “Services guarantees citizenship,” is an honest alternative to the Constitution depending on how you describe “The People.” I don’t think the meaning of “The people” has changed or is all that hard to understand.
So just for the fun of it, the following link shows several words whose meaning has changed over time. You might be surprised at what you read.
The 2nd Amendment means what it says; you have the natural right to own a firearm despite what they want you to believe.

About Don McDougall



Don McDougall
Don McDougall
Don McDougall is an NRA instructor and member of the Los Padres “Friends of the NRA” committee. If he’s not at the range, you will find him setting the record straight with on gun issues and gun safety on AmmoLand Shooting Sports News.
______________________________________________________________
 Red Flag Law Gone Bad and Bullet Ordinance Law Rant
 Losing our rights and we need to make a Stand. Contact your local, state, and federal representative to voice your needs. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/maryland... https://www.ammoland.com/2018/09/wayn... Email: kotaboy32@gmail.com
 
H.R. 7115 What it Means: CONTROL
 Career politicians who know nothing of firearms making laws on Firearms Parts pieces and processes should not be allowed here is my take on HR 7115
  
Gun Gripes #170: "Red Flag Laws"
by IraqVeteran8888
 In this Gripe we discuss the dangers of so called "Red Flag Laws," the consequences and dangers inherent in these unconstitutional laws that completely ignore due process and have been proven to be statistically relevant in states which adopted these laws early on. Stay tuned, much more on the way.






  • UNABLE TO REACH ASIA BIBI, MUSLIMS IN PAKISTAN ARE ATTACKING RANDOM CHRISTIANS

    Protests after Christian woman released from captivity in Pakistan

     UNABLE TO REACH ASIA BIBI, MUSLIMS IN PAKISTAN ARE ATTACKING RANDOM CHRISTIANS 
    BY CHRISTINE DOUGLASS-WILLIAMS
    republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
     Islamists reportedly attacked travelers in Pakistan who 
    identified themselves as Christians in the wake of the decision by the 
    Supreme Court to rescind the 2010 death sentence against Asia Bibi for 
    alleged blasphemy, CNN reported on Sunday.
    Christians in Pakistan are being taught a lesson, and are being made an example. Rampaging Muslims who are out for Asia Bibi’s life are now escalating their persecution of Christians in Pakistan, since they can’t get to Bibi herself.
    Jihad Watch has been meticulously covering the deranged calls for the blood of Bibi after she was acquitted on trumped-up blasphemy charges. Multitudes rioted in the streets of Pakistan, demanding her death. Even the Supreme Court judges who acquitted her were threatened, and then, facing the mad fury over the acquittal, the Pakistani government capitulated to the rioters, banned Asia Bibi from leaving country, and is reviewing her blasphemy acquittal.
    This move by the Pakistani government was a reflection of its adherence to Islamic blasphemy laws. Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan “vowed to take the matter [of blasphemy] to the United Nations, saying that few in the West understand the pain caused to Muslims by such activities.”
    It is beyond pain. It’s Islamic law, rooted in supremacism and entitlement. Muhammad and Islam must not be offended, period. And this rule does not apply only to Muslims, but to anyone. This is the reason why many Islamic groups in the West work overtime to ensure that Westerners are kept in line with Islam’s official closed corpus. The “Islamophobia” subterfuge is now rooted in Western societies. “Islamophobia” is passed off as a form of “racism,” but the “Islamophobia” initiative is really about silencing criticism of Islam. Therefore, rather than risk Muslim ire, or violence and rioting by Muslims, Westerners are shutting their mouths and sticking to criticizing Judaism, Christianity or any other faith if they wish to, but they do not dare criticize Islam. It is superior to every other faith, in the implied view of proponents of “Islamophobia” and “hate speech” laws.
    Take, for example, Canada. Pakistani MP Iqra Khalid introduced her anti-Islamophobia motion M-103, which passed in Parliament, and now the Trudeau government, as a followup, is “taking action” and “monitoring citizens for compliance” — as part of a 23 million dollar anti-“discrimination” plan- – under the leadership and direction of groups such as the National Council of Canadian Muslims (formerly CAIR.Can) and the Islamic Charity IRFAN, which was designated a terror-linked group by the previous Conservative government.

    “Report: Unable to Reach Asia Bibi, Pakistan’s Islamists Attacking Random Christians,” by Edwin Mora, Breitbart, November 12, 2018:
    Islamists reportedly attacked travelers in Pakistan who identified themselves as Christians in the wake of the decision by the Supreme Court to rescind the 2010 death sentence against Asia Bibi for alleged blasphemy, CNN reported on Sunday.
    Breitbart News has long reported that Pakistan’s controversial blasphemy law is disproportionally used target religious minorities, particularly Christians.
    Human rights groups have determined that Muslims often use the law to settle personal disputes and vendettas.
    Peter Jacob, the executive director for the Center for Social Justice in Lahore, told CNN that half of the individuals accused of blasphemy in Pakistan are non-Muslims, adding that his organization registered cases in which anti-Bibi rioters asked travelers to divulge their religion, and if they revealed they were Christian, “They were taken out of their cars and beaten up.”
    “The mental and psychological scars” inflicted on the Christian community will endure in the “current climate of fear,” Jacob noted.
    CNN recently spoke to members of the Christian minority community in Pakistan impacted by Bibi’s acquittal.
    “While speculation is rife about the safety of Bibi and her family, there are larger conversations at stake regarding the protection of Pakistan’s tiny Christian minority,” CNN noted, adding, “The country’s strict blasphemy laws are a topic of great sensitivity in Pakistan; accusations of blasphemy have seen a surge in mob violence and lynchings in pockets of the country.”
    Followers of Christ make up less than two percent of Pakistan’s population of 200 million, according to Jacob. Yet they have been in the territory that forms modern Pakistan for centuries, long before it was declared an Islamic country.
    “Please don’t name us,” a member of Pakistan’s Christian minority told CNN on condition of anonymity for fear of retribution. “But we are Christians and if Muslims aren’t safe from these conversations then we are nothing to these people, we respect the judgment of the Supreme Court, and that is paramount, I just want this situation to go away and for this tension to be lifted from our shoulders.”
    Nearly a week after the October 31 Supreme Court decision to acquit Bibi, Pakistani authorities moved her to an undisclosed location last Thursday, fearing for her safety.
    Islamists linked to the anti-blasphemy Tehreek-e-Labaik Pakistan (TLP) party that orchestrated riots across the Muslim country soon after the supreme court’s decision have threatened to kill Bibi, her lawyer, and the judges who cleared her.
    Last Friday, the Pakistani government reached a deal with TLP to prevent Bibi from leaving the country while the Supreme Court deals with petitions to review its acquittal of the Christian mother of five…..

    POPE FRANCIS, DEFENDER OF ISLAM, TO VISIT MOROCCO TO "STRENGTHEN CHRISTIAN-MUSLIM TIES"~POPE SAYS "GOSSIPERS ARE TERRORISTS", BUT ISLAMIC JIHADIS AREN'T

    POPE FRANCIS, DEFENDER OF ISLAM, 
    TO VISIT MOROCCO TO 
    "STRENGTHEN CHRISTIAN-MUSLIM TIES"
    BY ROBERT SPENCER
    republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
     
    Why is he going? To report to his superiors?
    Pope Francis last year met in the Vatican with Dr. Muhammad bin Abdul Karim Al-Issa, the secretary general of the Muslim World League (MWL), a group that has been linked to the financing of jihad terror.
    During the meeting, al-Issa thanked the Pope for his “fair positions” on what he called the “false claims that link extremism and violence to Islam.” In other words, he thanked the Pope for dissembling about the motivating ideology of jihad terror, which his group has been accused of financing, and for defaming other religions in an effort to whitewash Islam.
    I don’t object to the Pope’s meeting this man. After all, Jesus was a friend of tax collectors and sinners. But the meeting appears to have been a pointless feelgood session, probably featuring some sly dawah from al-Issa. According to Breitbart News, “the two men reportedly exchanged views on a number of ‘issues of common interest’ including peace and global harmony, and discussed cooperation on issues of peaceful coexistence and the spread of love.”
    The spread of love. Yes, that’s what the Muslim World League is all about.
    Nor is this the first time a Muslim leader has thanked the Pope for being so very useful. Last July, Ahmed al-Tayeb, the Grand Imam of Cairo’s al-Azhar, thanked him for his “defense of Islam against the accusation of violence and terrorism.”
    Has any other Pope of Rome in the history of Christianity ever been heralded as a “defender of Islam”? Should he be a defender of Islam? Shouldn’t he instead be defending the Christians who are being persecuted in Muslim countries?
    “Leave them; they are blind guides. And if a blind man leads a blind man, both will fall into a pit.” (Matthew 15:14)

    “Pope plans Morocco trip in March to strengthen Christian-Muslim ties,” by Ella Ide, Times of Israel, November 13, 2018 (thanks to Paul):
    VATICAN CITY, Holy See (AFP) – Pope Francis, who has made building bridges between Christianity and Islam a cornerstone of his papacy, will visit Morocco in March, the Vatican said Tuesday.
    Francis, 81, will be the second pope to travel to Morocco, following John Paul II more than three decades ago.
    He will take in Rabat and Casablanca on the March 30-31 trip to the Muslim-majority country, the Vatican said.
    The pontiff was “accepting the invitation extended by King Mohammed VI and the bishops,” it said.
    Francis has already visited several Muslim countries, including Turkey in 2014, Azerbaijan in 2016, and Egypt in 2017.
    John Paul II went to Morocco in 1985 on a trip that was also seen as an opportunity to build ties between Muslims and Christians….
    Foreign Christians worship freely and are protected by the authorities. But those who convert to Christianity — estimated to be a few thousand people — do so quietly.
    And why is that? Because they’ll be killed if they announce their conversions, per Islam’s death penalty for apostasy. But AFP doesn’t want you to know about that.
    ___________________________________________________________
     Pope: “Gossipers are terrorists,” 
    but Islamic jihadis aren’t
    BY ROBERT SPENCER
    republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
     
    “Gossipers are terrorists because with their tongues they drop a bomb and then leave, and the bomb they drop destroys reputations everywhere,”
    But Islamic jihadis are not terrorists: “Christian terrorism does not exist, Jewish terrorism does not exist, and Muslim terrorism does not exist. They do not exist,” Francis said in a speech last year. “There are fundamentalist and violent individuals in all peoples and religions—and with intolerant generalizations they become stronger because they feed on hate and xenophobia.”
    “Leave them; they are blind guides. And if a blind man leads a blind man, both will fall into a pit.” (Matthew 15:14)

    “Pope Francis says ‘to gossip is to kill,’ compares it to form of ‘terrorism,'” by Nicole Darrah, Fox News, November 14, 2018:
    Pope Francis implored his faithful followers on Wednesday to refrain from gossiping, as he believes it’s a form of “terrorism” and “to gossip is to kill.”
    “Gossipers are terrorists because with their tongues they drop a bomb and then leave, and the bomb they drop destroys reputations everywhere,” Francis said during his weekly general audience….
    “We all live by communicating, and we are continuously on the edge between truth and lies,” Francis said. He added that gossip “kills because the tongue kills like a knife.”…