Translate

Friday, December 6, 2019

KATIE HOPKINS VIDEO: THEY PLOTTED TO BEHEAD ME~WHEN A FEMALE JIHADI WANTS YOUR HEAD AS A WEDDING PRESENT

KATIE HOPKINS VIDEO: THEY PLOTTED TO BEHEAD ME~WHEN A FEMALE JIHADI WANTS YOUR HEAD AS A WEDDING PRESENT 
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research 
purposes:
Subscribe to the Glazov Gang‘s YouTube Channel and follow us on Twitter: @JamieGlazov.
This new Glazov Gang episode features Katie HopkinsU.K.’s freedom fighter.
Katie shares: They Plotted to Behead Me, unveiling when a female Jihadi wants your head as a wedding present.
Don’t miss it!
And make sure to watch Anni Cyrus discuss My Forced-Hijab Nightmare, where she shares her harrowing torment at the hands of Islam.

SOUTH FLORIDA DINING WITH HAMAS AND THE TALIBAN~GUESS WHO'S COMING TO DINNER?

SOUTH FLORIDA DINING WITH HAMAS AND THE TALIBAN~GUESS WHO'S COMING TO DINNER? 
BY JOE KAUFMAN
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research 
purposes:
Within Muslim circles, Monzer Taleb is heralded as a popular motivational speaker. But it wasn’t long ago that his name and likeness were brought up, during a terrorism trial dealing with the financing of millions of dollars to Hamas. On Friday, December 6th, Taleb will be headlining a group of radical Muslim lecturers and clerics, including an imam, Izhar Khan, who was charged by the US Justice Department with helping to finance the Taliban, at the Mehfil restaurant’s banquet hall in Sunrise, Florida. This article is meant to alert the public as to what is taking place right in their backyard.
According to his Facebook page, Monzer Mustafa Taleb is a special instructor at Bayyinah, an Arabic studies institute based in Dallas, Texas. Bayyinah is the brainchild of Nouman Ali Khan, a Muslim preacher who, in September 2017, was accused of manipulating his female followers into sex and sham marriages and offering them hush money to keep quiet about it.
In the course of the US government’s prosecution of the Holy Land Foundation (HLF), in 2007 and 2008, a video was submitted into evidence showing Taleb participating at an event sponsored by the Islamic Association for Palestine (IAP) as the lead vocalist of a singing troupe called Al-Sakhra. Both HLF and IAP were functions of an American Hamas network led by then-global head of Hamas Mousa Abu Marzook. On the video, Taleb sings, “O Jew, O coward… I am from Hamas and have never cheered for anyone else besides her… And she is the one which marches with the light of Muhammad… towards Jihad.”
In addition to his singing gig, Taleb ran the multimedia wing of the InfoCom Corporation, a now-defunct web hosting service company established by HLF co-founder Ghassan Elashi and his four brothers. Following trials taking place in 2004 and 2005, InfoCom and the Elashi brothers were convicted of money laundering and fundraising on behalf of Hamas.
Over a decade later, Taleb is still promoting Hamas and other Palestinian terrorist groups. In August 2014, Taleb posted a graphic on his Facebook page depicting four characters, three of which are famous superheroes; the fourth is a masked Hamas militant with the name, GAZAMAN. The caption under the figures reads, “A SUPERHERO ALWAYS WEARS A MASK.” In 2015, Taleb posted a video showcasing five Palestinian flags, three of which are from groups – Hamas, Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ), and the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP) – named on the US State Department list of Foreign Terrorist Organizations (FTO).
In December 2017, Taleb attended the Dallas, Texas ‘Rally for Jerusalem, Capital of Palestine’ event, where he filmed himself and others stepping and stomping on an Israeli flag. This past June, Taleb posted onto social media that the Jewish state “should be relocated to Germany or elsewhere.”
Izhar Khan is the imam of Masjid Jamaat Al-Mumineen (MJAM), located in Margate, Florida. In May 2011, Khan was arrested and spent the next 20 months in a Miami federal detention center for his alleged participation in a terror financing scheme to ship $50 thousand to the Pakistani Taliban for the specific goal of murdering American troops overseas.
As stated by the US Justice Department, “Izhar is a Pakistani Taliban sympathizer who worked with [his father Hafiz] and others to collect and deliver money for the Pakistani Taliban… Izhar… provided and attempted to provide material support and resources… knowing and intending that they be used in preparation for and in carrying out… a conspiracy to murder, kidnap, and maim persons in a foreign country.”
Besides Khan, there are a number of other imams featured at the December 6th banquet, representing their respective radical mosques.
Representing the Nur-ul-Islam mosque at the banquet is Nur-ul-Islam imam Roshan Ali. A past member of the mosque’s Islamic Affairs Council and ex-Vice President of the mosque’s children’s school, Nur-ul-Islam Academy (NUIA), Raed Awad, was the Florida representative for the Holy Land Foundation. The homepage of NUIA’s website previously contained a link to islamway.com, which, according to the US Justice Department, “included pages devoted to violent jihad” and “included a section urging Muslims to contribute money to Hamas.”
Representing the Islamic Foundation of South Florida (IFSF) at the banquet is IFSF imam Sultan Mohammed. IFSF’s former Youth Group leader, Abdur Rahman al-Ghani, used his Facebook page to label Jews “demonic,” refer to the US as the “World’s Number One Terrorist Organization,” and claim Muslims “will overtake the World.” IFSF co-founder and former director, Mohammed Javed Quereshi, is credited with introducing “Dirty Bomber” Jose Padilla to Islam, prior to Padilla joining al-Qaeda and plotting to set off a radiological bomb in the US.
Representing the Islamic Center of Boca Raton (ICBR) at the December 6th banquet is ICBR imam and prayer leader Mohamad Zahed. ICBR’s mosque was built using $600 thousand in seed money from the Global Relief Foundation (GRF), an al-Qaeda-related charity that was shut down by the US government in December 2001. One of ICBR’s founders, Syed Khawer Ahmad, was a website designer for Hamas. From October 1999 through September 2001, ICBR published on its website a violently anti-Semitic essay, titled ‘Why can’t the Jews and Muslims live together in peace?’ It described Jews as “people of treachery and betrayal” and “enemies.”
The sponsor of the December 6th banquet is the Bangladesh American Society of Muslim Aid for Humanity (BASMAH). It is the group’s 2nd Annual Banquet for the Rohingya Refugees. BASMAH’s Director of Donor Development is the founding imam of ICBR, Ibrahim Dremali. In October 2000, Dremali spoke at a rally, where the crowd burned Israeli flags and shouted for “Zionist blood.” Dremali told them “not to be sad for those who were martyred and to not be afraid to die for what they believe in.” Dremali has spent time on the federal ‘no-fly’ list, and in October 2010, Dremali and his then-wife, Safaa Eissa, were arrested for marriage fraud.
This banquet in support of Rohingya Muslims is no innocuous fundraiser. It includes documented terror supporters and imams of radical mosques, whose reality is much more about promoting hatred than humanitarian help. The event should only be viewed as a threat to society and a threat to our nation. Viewing it any other way is unreasonable and makes us vulnerable to future acts of terror (bankrolled by banquets such as this).
Beila Rabinowitz, Director of Militant Islam Monitor, contributed to this report.

SCHOOL "DIVERSITY INVENTORY" PRIES INTO STUDENTS' SEXUALITY, FINANCES, RELIGION

Why teach students when you can indoctrinate them instead?
Big Brother had his telescreens, the Chinese have their social credit system, and Heritage High School in Wake Forest has their ‘Diversity Inventory’ for 10th graders.
Heritage High School English teacher Melissa Wilson, (mwilson2@wcpss.net) who makes $4,121 a month, was suspended without pay from Sept. 12 to 18, according to Lisa Luten, a spokeswoman for the Wake County Public School System.

Heritage High School


1150 Forestville Rd, Wake Forest NC 27587
919-570-5600 - Main Office
SCHOOL "DIVERSITY INVENTORY" PRIES INTO STUDENTS' SEXUALITY, FINANCES, RELIGION
 “Students were traumatized; 
some were even brought to tears.”
BY SARA DOGAN
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research 
purposes:
As students in one North Carolina high school were headed back to class last August, they were forced to participate in a demeaning “diversity inventory” which required them to answer personal questions about their gender, sexuality, religion and financial well-being and those of their neighbors in an effort to make them aware of their respective privilege. The disturbing assignment occurred in a 10th grade English class at Heritage High School in Wake Forest. Teacher Melissa Wilson asked her class to fill out a “Diversity Inventory” worksheet which asked the teenagers to reveal highly sensitive and personal information. The worksheet was formatted as a grid. Students were first asked to fill out information on their own “gender,” “race/ethnicity,” “age,” “sexuality,” “ability,” “religion,” and “socio-economic status.” Then they were asked to provide this information for “most of my close friends,” “my teachers” and “my neighbors,” among others. In case simply writing down this personal information wasn't enough, Wilson then asked her students to go and stand under signs that corresponded to their reported sexuality. The North Carolina Values Coalition reports that “Students were traumatized” by the exercise and “Some were even brought to tears.” “At this morning's meeting, one parent said that her student had been experiencing PTSD from the incident,” the report continues. “Another student didn't attend school on Friday, and is so scared to return to Wilson's classroom environment that they told their parent they hoped the hurricane would distract everyone from this incident. Another parent's child Facetimed them in the middle of the classroom to tell them how uncomfortable they were with the assignment. Another student had a friend who had recently shared very private information about themselves to a select number of their peers, and went white when the teacher asked students to now stand and reveal their private identities.” “We also learned that this was not a once-time incident. Ms. Melissa Wilson apparently has given this assignment in the past,” the NCVC reported. Parent Dina Bartus described the effect that the assignment had on her son. “He actually broke down and started crying because he said, ‘I felt so uncomfortable, but felt so on the spot that I had to do it.’ He said the pressure was just incredible, and my son doesn’t cry easily, so it really really bothered him,” the mother described. Bartus shared a photo of the assignment on Facebook and it quickly went viral.  The teacher also added her own commentary to the assignment. “When some kids were kind of hesitant to do it she [the teacher] said, ‘Hey, it’s OK because I used to be a Catholic and now I’m an atheist and I’m bi-sexual,’ Bartus added. “So, needless to say, my son was a little shocked that this was happening in what’s supposed to be an English class.” The mother emailed the school principal to demand that her son be removed from Wilson’s class. She had to contact him twice before she received a response. “It’s hard enough going to high school without having your teacher call you out and lump you into a category — and not a category like ‘do you like football or baseball?’ A category of, ‘who do you want to have sex with?’ That’s unacceptable,” Bartus said. After numerous parents aired their concerns, the school released a statement noting that “the principal reviewed the activity and resource and directed the teacher to discontinue the lesson immediately.” “The Diversity Inventory worksheet in question is not a district-provided resource. We will continue to work with educators on how to effectively lead important conversations connected to identity, culture, and other sensitive topics as appropriate,” the statement continued. Melissa Wilson, the teacher who forced her students to complete the diversity inventory, was suspended without pay from her job for five days, but has now returned to teaching students. Parent Dina Bartus doesn’t think these consequences were sufficient. “I don’t think she belongs in the classroom, or at least with minors,” she said.
To learn more about the Freedom Center's campaign to halt indoctrination in K-12 schools, please visit  www.stopk12indoctrination.org.  To read the K-12 Code of Ethics CLICK HERE. To order the Freedom Center’s new pamphlet, “Leftist Indoctrination in Our K-12 Public Schools,” CLICK HERE. To donate to the Stop K-12 Indoctrination campaign, CLICK HERE.
_____________________________________________________
EXCERPTS FROM: https://www.ncvalues.org/social_justicerepublished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
And this assignment seems to be illegal. According to the 20 U.S. Code § 1232h.Protection of Pupil Rights, subjection (b) states:
  • (b)Limits on survey, analysis, or evaluations No student shall be required, as part of any applicable program, to submit to a survey, analysis, or evaluation that reveals information concerning—
    1. (1)political affiliations or beliefs of the student or the student’s parent;
    2. (2)mental or psychological problems of the student or the student’s family;
    3. (3)sex behavior or attitudes;
    4. (4)illegal, anti-social, self-incriminating, or demeaning behavior;
    5. (5)critical appraisals of other individuals with whom respondents have close family relationships;
    6. (6)legally recognized privileged or analogous relationships, such as those of lawyers, physicians, and ministers;
    7. (7)religious practices, affiliations, or beliefs of the student or student’s parent; or
    8. (8)income (other than that required by law to determine eligibility for participation in a program or for receiving financial assistance under such program),
    9. without the prior consent of the student (if the student is an adult or emancipated minor), or in the case of an unem
Miss Wilson's assignment seems to violate the Protection of Pupil rights subsection
  • (b) (3) on surveying "sex behaviors or attitudes" where her inventory asks for "sexuality;"
  • it seems to violate (b) (5) “Critical appraisals of other individuals with whom respondents have close family relationships" where she asks for the identity traits of "my teacher" "my close friends" and my doctor;
  • it seems to violate (b) (6) “Legally recognized privileged or analogous relationships, such as those of lawyers, physicians, and ministers," where her inventory asks for the identity traits of the students doctors;
  • it seems to violate (b) (7) “Religious practices, affiliations, or beliefs of the student or the student’s parent" where it asks for the religion of the child and their parents;
  • and it seems to violate (b) (8) income" where it asks for their socio-economic status. 

IT AIN'T FOR WOMEN: WHY THE CHURCH SHOULD NOT HAVE FEMALE LEADERSHIP

IT AIN'T FOR WOMEN: WHY THE CHURCH SHOULD NOT HAVE FEMALE LEADERSHIP
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research 
purposes:
Complementarianism was a bad idea, forged in the heart of weak-willed men who, lorded over by the threat of monstrous women, tried to find a more polite way of saying, men should lead. Ideas founded upon the sands of rhetorical weakness will eventually collapse into a heap of a thousand misplaced notions.
To the devil’s hell with complementarianism.
It was a failed experiment. We should stick to a better term, a Biblical term, a justifiable notion…patriarchy.
Patriarchy is defined as an organization with male leadership, and that’s exactly what the Bible explicitly commands of the church and of the home, and it requires no large amount of Scripture to justify it. And it takes no small amount of Scripture-twisting to negate it.
God Almighty established the Patriarchy when he set the twelve tribes of Israel by male headship. Do we shirk from the reality that God Himself used the word Patriarch to describe Abraham in his Sacred Writ (Hebrews 7:4)? Do we avoid the holy term as sinister because it makes modern-day feminists howl with indignation?
That God established male headship over the Covenant people of Israel and the Covenant people of the church is indisputable.
There are 66 Books of the Holy Bible. The volumes were written by approximately 40 men over the course of 1500 years. Not a single woman was inspired of the Holy Spirit to pen the Text.
There were twelve judges who ruled over Israel. One, Deborah, was a woman. Unlike the other eleven judges, the Scripture curiously does not mention that God appointed her (Judges 4:4). Her role was that of offering private counsel rather than public instruction (Judges 4:5-6). God used Deborah’s role in the position of judge to mock weak-willed, sissified men (Judges 4:9). In fact, the entire account was meant as a rebuke to Barak, who let her lead, much to his shame and divine scrutiny.
There were 19 kings of Israel and 20 kings of Judah. They were all men. There was one woman who served as queen without a king, Athaliah. She was the daughter of Jezebel and used her power to establish the worship of Ba’al. She was the first of the Monstrous Regiment of Women that would make people tremble before a woman outside of her rightful place, cleansing the kingdom via the murder of all the rightful male heirs to the throne. Her name means “afflicted by God.” It’s hardly the example one might use to suggest women should be in leadership. In Hebrews 11, the author replaces Deborah’s place in history among the judges with Barak, indicating that he was God’s (flawed but anointed) rightful judge.
There are 17 prophets in the Bible listed among the various books. All are men.
Jesus chose 70 (or by some accounts, 72) witnesses to send out with the Gospel. History records their names, and not a woman was among them. Likewise, of 12 Disciples, Jesus chose not a single woman. If you add Paul to the list of those appointed by Christ to lead the New Testament church, that means out of up to 85 ecclesiastical appointments, Jesus chose not a single woman to lead.
The New Testament records precisely zero female pastors or elders in the New Testament, while the names of male pastors are mentioned frequently in the Pauline epistles.
There is no early church record of female pastors in the centuries following Christ, and the first prominent female leaders we see in church history are two prophetesses, Maximilla and Priscilla, who were suicidal hussies who founded a cult and were anathematized by virtually the entire universal church. Consider this in comparison to the “Apostolic Church Fathers” who – as you might suspect – include a list of only men.
Either the post-apostolic church was ‘misogynist’ or they just followed the example of Christ. We would suggest that Jesus built his church (Matthew 16:18) exactly how he wanted it, and it did not include female leaders.
This is not to say that the New Testament does not include the names of many women who played peripheral roles on the sidelines who were important supporting characters. In fact, 57 women are named in the pages of the New Testament. Rather than prove the point that women should lead it defeats it; out of 57 women named in the New Testament, not a single one was a pastor or elder.
Women followed (Luke 8:1-3). Jesus was friends with women (Mary and Martha, the sisters of Lazarus in particular). Jesus was surrounded by older women who cared for him (his mother, his aunt, Joanna, Chuza, Susanna). His female converts were some of the most faithful and the most reckless (Mary Magdalene). But far from proving the point that women must lead in the church, these women are not mentioned anywhere in the Book of Acts as leading anything. Their absence in Acts is not misogyny on Luke’s part, for he was the one who named them in his Gospel.
Israel was Patriarchal. The church is Patriarchal. God designed them both.
There is a slow, dripping stream of estrogen into the American evangelical church. It has softened us. It has made us weak.
The fact is, men do not want to follow women, because it is unnatural. Men want to follow men. For that matter, godly women want to follow men. There is no quicker way to divorce men from the church than to place a woman at the front, and tell them to submit to them as unto an elder (Hebrews 13:17).
Christian men are already passive enough, that we need not emasculate them more by demanding them to obey and submit to women, as the Scripture commands the church submit to its elders. Over time, making men listen to women preach is like making them pee sitting down; sooner or later they will get used to it, see the appeal, and go with the flow. And what comes out of a female preacher’s mouth is usually not better than what happens comes out the urethra.
The only way a person can claim that it is God’s will for a woman to be in a position of leadership in the church is to ignore the facts presented in the Scripture about God’s will for leadership in the church. It is right there, printed in black and white. For the act of female preaching – a role of the pastorate – to be done, there must already be present a theology that amounts to waste from a full bladder. Ultimately, that preaching will be odorous, toxic, and fetid.
Female preaching in the church is not only disallowed in the epistles, but it is disrespectful and disinterested in the Bible from the onset. It is unbiblical, uninteresting, frivolous, spurious, and is usually little more than prattling nonsense. This is not because women are not capable of handling God’s Word. It’s because women are are capable of handling God’s Word already know better than to preach in the Sacred Assembly.