Translate

Thursday, February 28, 2019

DEMOCRAT HOUSE MAJORITY PASSES GUN CONTROL BILLS HR 8 & HR 1112 BY A 240-190 VOTE~GOP & SECOND AMENDMENT ACTIVISTS HOLD PRESS CONFERENCE

DEMOCRAT HOUSE MAJORITY PASSES GUN CONTROL BILLS HR 8 & HR 1112 BY A 240-190 VOTE~
GOP & SECOND AMENDMENT ACTIVISTS HOLD 
PRESS CONFERENCE
SEE: https://www.ammoland.com/2019/02/gop-gun-activist-hold-press-conference-on-universal-background-check-bill-video/republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:

Anthony Colandro ~ “not only fighting for your rights in New Jersey but Federally as well!”
Washington, DC – -(AmmoLand.com)- A host of Republican congressional members and second amendment activists gathered outside the Capitol Building on Tuesday to express opposition to a pair of anti-gun pieces of legislation that House Democrats are poised to bring to the floor for a vote.
Several House Republican lawmakers held a press conference Tuesday on Capitol Hill to protest two Democrat bills that would restrict Americans’ Second Amendment right. House Republican Whip Steve Scalise (R-LA), House Republican Conference Chairman Liz Cheney (R-WY), House Judiciary Ranking Member Doug Collins (R-GA), and Reps. Phil Roe (R-TN), Richard Hudson (R-NC), Randy Weber (R-TX), Matt Gaetz (R-FL), Kelly Armstrong (R-ND), Greg Steube (R-FL), and activists Like Anthony Colandro from Gun For Hire in New Jersey attended and spoke against HR 8 and HR 1112 – Universal Background Checks.
“HR 8 is taking the fears and concerns of a nation over gun violence and perpetrating a fraud over them,” said Republican Georgia Rep. Doug Collins, the ranking member on the House Judiciary Committee. “[Democrats are] preying upon the very victims that they’re wanting to supposedly help by putting a bill out there that will not help them, by constantly bringing up the mass violence instances such as at schools and theaters and others — they’re saying this will help.”
“The problem with this bill, and they [Democrats] just exposed it to themselves, is the Obama administration’s Department of Justice said if you’re going to at least try universal background checks, you have to have a registry,” Collins continued.
______________________________________________________________

U.S. House Passes Extreme Gun Control Bill, 

President Trump Threatens VETO

BY NRAHQ
SEE: https://www.ammoland.com/2019/02/u-s-house-passes-extreme-gun-control-bill-president-trump-threatens-veto/republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Opinion
H.R. 8 Mandates “Universal” Background Checks.

Wherever you look, Bloomberg’s fingerprints are all over these attempts to pass “universal” background checks.
U.S. House Passes Extreme Gun Control Bill, President Trump Threatens VETO
Fairfax, VA – -(Ammoland.com)- Today, the newly minted anti-gun leadership in the U.S. House of Representatives passed its first gun control measure by a 240 -190 vote, offering further proof that anti-gun politicians are more interested in scoring cheap political points than doing their jobs and passing meaningful legislation that would make Americans safer.
Chris W. Cox, the executive director of the National Rifle Association’s Institute for Legislative Action (NRA-ILA), issued the following response to the passage of H.R. 8:
“This extreme gun-control bill will make criminals out of law-abiding Americans. It will also make it harder for good people to defend themselves and their families. Criminals, on the other hand, will continue to get their firearms the way they always have – through the black market, theft, and straw purchases. Forcing more government paperwork and additional fees on good people trying to exercise a constitutional right will do nothing to make Americans safer. On behalf of our members and supporters, the National Rifle Association will continue to fight to preserve the constitutionally protected right to self-defense.”

Earlier this week, President Donald Trump issued a statement of administrative action publicly stating he would veto H.R. 8.

WhiteHouse on H.R. 8:
” The Administration opposes H.R. 8 because it would impose burdensome requirements on certain firearm transactions. H.R. 8 would require that certain transfers, loans, gifts, and sales of firearms be processed by a federally licensed importer, manufacturer, or dealer of firearms. H.R. 8 would therefore impose permanent record-keeping requirements and limitless fees on these everyday transactions.
H.R. 8 contains very narrow exemptions from these requirements, and these exemptions would not sufficiently protect the Second Amendment right of individuals to keep and bear arms. For example, unless an exemption applies, both the act of leaving a weapon in the temporary care of a neighbor while traveling and the act of later retrieving that weapon would require processing by a licensed entity under H.R. 8. Also, unless such an exemption applies, domestic violence victims would be prohibited from borrowing a firearm for self-defense without first having the transaction go through such a licensed entity. The extensive regulation required by H.R. 8 is incompatible with the Second Amendment’s guarantee of an individual right to keep arms.
By overly extending the minimum time that a licensed entity is required to wait for background check results, H.R. 1112 would unduly impose burdensome delays on individuals seeking to purchase a firearm. For this reason, the Administration opposes the legislation. H.R. 1112 would require a federally licensed firearms importer, manufacturer, or dealer that initiates a mandatory background check on an individual seeking to purchase a firearm to wait ten business days on results before processing the transaction. If the Federal Government fails to complete the background check within this window of time, the individual seeking to purchase the firearm may petition the Government for permission to proceed with the transfer.
Under H.R. 1112, the licensed entity would be required to wait an additional ten business days after such a petition is filed before it is allowed to proceed with processing the transaction. Currently, such background checks are considered invalid 30 calendar days after the date the licensed entity initiated them. As the bill is written, therefore, an individual must file their petition on the earliest day possible. If they fail to do so, H.R. 1112 would effectively prohibit some firearms purchases from being processed because the initiated background check would be considered invalid before the end of the second ten-business-day waiting period. Allowing the Federal Government to restrict firearms purchases through bureaucratic delay would undermine the Second Amendment’s guarantee that law-abiding citizens have an individual right to keep and bear arms.
If H.R. 8, or H.R. 1112, are presented to the President, his advisors would recommend he veto the bill.”
Established in 1871, the National Rifle Association is America's oldest civil rights and sportsmen's group. More than five million members strong, NRA continues to uphold the Second Amendment and advocates enforcement of existing laws against violent offenders to reduce crime. The Association remains the nation's leader in firearm education and training for law-abiding gun owners, law enforcement and the armed services. Follow the NRA on social at Facebook.com/NationalRifleAssociation and Twitter @NRA.

National Rifle Association Institute For Legislative Action (NRA-ILA)
About:
Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the “lobbying” arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Visit: www.nra.org

Wednesday, February 27, 2019

PALESTINIANS UPROOT TREES PLANTED IN MEMORY OF JEWISH GIRL BRUTALLY MURDERED BY JIHADIST "PALESTINIAN"

Group Of "Palestinians" Stealing 50 Trees Planted By Jews In Memory Of Ori Ansbacher

THE RAPIST-MURDERER:
PALESTINIANS UPROOT TREES PLANTED IN MEMORY OF JEWISH GIRL BRUTALLY MURDERED BY JIHADIST 
BY CHRISTINE DOUGLASS-WILLIAMS
SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2019/02/video-palestinians-uproot-trees-planted-in-memory-of-jewish-girl-brutally-murdered-by-jihadistrepublished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
The attack on 19-year-old Ori Ansbacher was so brutal that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu called the murder “shocking brutality,” and it has been described by many as one of “the most horrific murders Israel has ever seen.” After being raped, she was murdered because she was Jewish, and the jihadist who did it, 29-year-old Hebron resident Arafat Irfayia, was captured in a mosque after DNA evidence led Israeli authorities there.
Palestinian Minister of Religious Affairs Yusuf Ida’is was so incensed that Israeli authorities dared to enter a mosque to search for the jihadist that he issued a statement calling the arrest “a cowardly attack against a religious and sacred place of worship.”
There are no limits to the barbarity of jihadists. Now, right after a new grove of 50 trees was planted in memory of  Ori Ansbacher, Palestinians raided the memorial, uprooted the trees and stole them away.


WATCH: Palestinians uproot & steal 50 trees that were planted by Jews in memory of terror victim, Ori Ansbacher, who was raped & murdered by a terrorist.

What they uproot we will plant fivefold more!

1,768 people are talking about this
“50 Trees Uprooted and Stolen by Arab Extremists in West Bank,” by Ilanit Chernick, Jerusalem Post, February 24, 2019:

Palestinian vandals uprooted and stole at least 50 newly planted trees in the Gush Etzion settlement of Nokdim on Sunday, according to Israeli media reports.
The new grove was planted on Friday in memory of terrorist victim Ori Ansbacher, just opposite the Tekoa settlement where she lived.
Ansbacher was raped and murdered by a Palestinian man earlier this month while she walking through the woods on the outskirts of Jerusalem, close to the Ein Yael Nature Museum where she volunteered with children.
Early Sunday morning, vandals allegedly entered the plot where Nokdim residents had planted the trees just two days earlier, and uprooted and stole some 50 of the new plantings.
During the tree-planting, clashes broke out between Palestinians and residents of Nokdim.
The army managed to keep away the Palestinians, who were trying to interfere with the planting.
However, when residents awoke Sunday morning, they found not only that trees had been uprooted, but that most of them had also been stolen.
The vandalism came nearly a week after some 200 cherry trees were uprooted and destroyed by vandals at a kibbutz near Gush Etzion in the West Bank.
Those trees were planted on land belonging to Keren Kayemeth LeIsrael–Jewish National Fund in an area known as the Mukhtar’s Saddle, which has been the focus of extremist vandalism in the past.
“Only a week ago, we witnessed agricultural terrorism in Kfar Etzion, and we are again witnessing terror in Jewish agriculture by our neighbors,” Gush Etzion Regional Council head Shlomo Ne’eman said after Sunday’s attack.

PAYPAL TOP DOG DAN SCHULMAN ADMITS PARTNERSHIP WITH HARD-LEFT SMEAR MACHINE "SPLC" TO BLACKLIST DISSIDENTS FROM LEFTIST AGENDA

BLACKLISTING, THE OTHER "MISSION" OF PAYPAL?
SOCIAL JUSTICE "EQUITY & INCLUSION" THE ADMITTED "CORE VALUE"; NOT CUSTOMER SERVICE!
PAYPAL TOP DOG ADMITS PARTNERSHIP WITH 
HARD-LEFT SMEAR MACHINE "SPLC" 
TO BLACKLIST DISSIDENTS FROM LEFTIST AGENDA
BY ROBERT SPENCER
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes: 
The SPLC’s vicious use of its “hate group” list to demonize and destroy legitimate groups that dissent from the Leftist agenda has gotten so bad that even the Washington Post took notice. Nonetheless, the Left’s authoritarian agenda is galloping forward, with steady bannings of dissidents from social media platforms. Soon only the Leftist point of view will be heard, and then an era of peace will dawn all over the West. Won’t it?
“PayPal CEO Admits Partnership with Far-Left SPLC to Blacklist Conservatives,” by Charlie Nash, Breitbart, February 25, 2019:
PayPal CEO Dan Schulman admitted during an interview with the Wall Street Journal that PayPal works with the far-left Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) when it considers blacklisting conservatives.
After being asked by the Wall Street Journal what “values” PayPal identifies with,” Schulman replied, “Probably the most important value to us is diversity and inclusion.”
“I think North Carolina was probably the moment that was the most visible, where we basically said this violates our core value and we need to make a very public stand on it,” claimed Schulman, referencing the time when PayPal pulled out of an investment in North Carolina because the state passed a bill making it mandatory for people to use the bathroom of their biological sex.
“Businesses need to be a force for good in those values and issues that they believe in. It shouldn’t come from backlash or people taking heat on it, because then it’s in response, as opposed to the definition of who you are and then how you react to the context that you find yourself in,” the PayPal CEO expressed, adding that the Charlottesville rally in 2017 was a “defining moment” for PayPal to start blacklisting conservatives.
Schulman claimed it “was a defining moment for us as a company,” that was “difficult,” because, “the line between free speech and hate, nobody teaches it to you in college. Nobody’s defined it in the law.”
During the interview, Schulman also admitted that the far-left SPLC helps to inform “PayPal’s decisions.”
“There are those both on the right and left that help us. Southern Poverty Law Center has brought things. We don’t always agree. We have our debates with them. We are very respectful with everyone coming in. We will do the examination carefully,” Schulman explained. “We’ll talk when we don’t agree with a finding: We understand why you think that way, but it still goes into the realm of free speech for us.”
The SPLC, which also reportedly works with Amazon, Google, Facebook, and Twitter, was forced to pay a $3.3 million settlements to anti-extremist activist Maajid Nawaz last year, after the organization included him on a list of “anti-Muslim extremists,” despite Nawaz being Muslim himself.
The lawsuit victory prompted at least 60 other organizations to also consider lawsuits against the SPLC, and in June, a Washington Post columnist declared the SPLC “has lost all credibility.”
PayPal has blacklisted WikiLeaksInfowars, conservative commentator and Vice co-founder Gavin McInnes, political activist Tommy Robinson, investigative journalist Laura Loomer, blogger Roosh V, free speech social network Gab, YouTube alternative BitChute, and a black metal music label.
Robert Spencer’s Jihad Watch, and Pamela Geller’s American Freedom Defense Initiative were also temporarily blacklisted by PayPal, before being reinstated….
_____________________________________________________________

PayPal CEO Schulman admits to working with SPLC to target nationalists

The CEO of PayPal, Daniel Schulman, told the Wall Street Journal that the core value of his company is "equity and inclusion" not providing great customer service or helping customers thrive in the world economy. He supports the gender fluidity nightmare. He is anti-white. Thus, he is denying service to nationalists. This is not fighting fair, and should motivate every nationalist, conservative, libertarian, and every other fair-minded person to stop him. This is dangerous and un-American. https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2019/0...

FACEBOOK BANS TOMMY ROBINSON, FALSELY CLAIMING HE CALLS FOR VIOLENCE AGAINST MUSLIMS

FACEBOOK BANS TOMMY ROBINSON, FALSELY CLAIMING HE CALLS FOR VIOLENCE AGAINST MUSLIMS 
BY ROBERT SPENCER
SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2019/02/facebook-bans-tommy-robinson-falsely-claiming-he-calls-for-violence-against-muslimsrepublished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
A Muslim activist in the UK is claiming credit for this:
I can reveal I recently had a meeting with Facebook to discuss pages and their impact in brainwashing his supporters to become terrorist and use violence against Muslims. A very good result and I am proud of my role.
1,195 people are talking about this
However, Tommy Robinson says: “…the reasons they’ve given are just complete lies. They’re saying I incited violence and that I openly called for violence against Muslims, that’s just a lie. If that was the case then they could show evidence of messages where I’d said that but I never have.”
Whatever you may think of Tommy Robinson, fascists such as Mohammed Shafiq are not going to stop with him. It will soon be impossible to voice any opposition to jihad mass murder or Sharia oppression of women, gays, and others on any social media platform. Then the jihad will be able to advance unopposed and unimpeded, which is the ultimate goal of all these efforts to silence critics of jihad terror.
“Tommy Robinson Banned from Facebook, Instagram,” by Oliver JJ Lane, Breitbart, February 26, 2019:

Facebook has banned British citizen journalist and street organiser Tommy Robinson from its platforms, including Instagram, in a move that comes days after he released a new documentary exposing what he claimed to be dishonest practise at establishment media giant BBC.
The social media giant claimed in a statement published Tuesday that Tommy Robinson’s own Facebook page, which had around one million ‘likes’ before deletion, “has repeatedly broken [Facebook community] standards, posting material that uses dehumanizing language and calls for violence targeted at Muslims. He has also behaved in ways that violate our policies around organized hate.”
Facebook claimed the move “is not a decision we take lightly.”
Responding to the ban, English Defence League founder turned citizen journalist Tommy Robinson told Breitbart London: “…the reasons they’ve given are just complete lies. They’re saying I incited violence and that I openly called for violence against Muslims, that’s just a lie. If that was the case then they could show evidence of messages where I’d said that but I never have.
“This is continued censorship which we all knew was coming but its been done instantly because of my documentary which exposed the establishment working with Hope not Hate, working with the BBC in order to destroy my name to the nation. When I exposed what they were doing they’ve put down the pressure to completely delete me from the internet. This has to show people the levels they’re gonna go to silence any opposition to mass migration and the Islamisation of this nation.”
Robinson’s removal from the platform is only the latest in a series of bans targeting the campaigner in recent years. He was de-platformed by Twitter in May 2018, bannedfrom receiving payments by Paypal in November of that year, and had Youtube videos blocked from earning revenue in January 2019.
Mr Robinson told Breitbart London that he would be working on his own mobile app for live streaming after his removal from several social media sites.
It is not clear what actions were taken by Mr Robinson’s social media page in the recent past to cause Facebook’s decision to remove him now, but the move does come just days after he released an exposé documentary claiming to reveal underhanded dealings at British state broadcaster the BBC. In the hour-long film, which Robinson uploaded to his Facebook page, it is alleged the BBC collaborated with far-left activist organisation HOPE Not Hate to create what was apparently called a “Tommy Takedown”.
Robinson’s film debuted at a protest he held in Manchester, England, outside the offices of the BBC where the Panorama documentary series is produced. Thousands are reported to have attended the heavily-policed event.
In the film, top BBC documentary maker John Sweeney can be seen being confronted by Robinson with undercover footage of him making apparently racist and classist statements. It is believed at least some of the claims and counterclaims between Mr Robinson, the BBC, and HOPE Not Hate may yet be contested in court.
Responding to the ban, Tommy Robinson ally and UKIP leader Gerard Batten said the rise of censorship showed the nation was headed towards a “dark place.” He said: “Without any explanation whatsoever, the personal Facebook accounts of key UKIP members and Tommy Robinson have been removed….

IRS INSIDER: FEDERAL RESERVE COMMITTED OVER 100 YEARS OF FRAUD AND DECEIT

IRS Insider: Federal Reserve Committed Over 100 Years Of Fraud And Deceit
IRS INSIDER: FEDERAL RESERVE COMMITTED OVER 
100 YEARS OF FRAUD AND DECEIT

A look into the biggest economic obstacle 

facing the United States

SEE: https://www.infowars.com/irs-insider-federal-reserve-committed-over-100-years-of-fraud-and-deceit/republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 allowed for fraud against the American people by the Fed, a private bank that to this day has never been audited.
Robert Barnes and Joe Banister join Alex to discuss the criminology and mindset of those that desire to manipulate the most amazing economy in history.


FASCIST "JOURNALIST" MARC THIBODEAU STEPS UP HIS SMEAR CAMPAIGN AGAINST ENSAF HAIDAR FOR MEETING ROBERT SPENCER

FASCIST "JOURNALIST" MARC THIBODEAU STEPS UP 
HIS SMEAR CAMPAIGN AGAINST ENSAF HAIDAR 
FOR MEETING ROBERT SPENCER 
BY ROBERT SPENCER
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
An update on this story: as you can see below, now “journalist” Marc Thibodeau is pressuring Amnesty International to drop its support for Ensaf Haidar. Suddenly, because she met me, it is unimportant to this man that her husband is unjustly imprisoned in Saudi Arabia and awaiting lashings that could kill him. Thibodeau is showing himself to be the ideological kin of the Saudis who are persecuting Raif Badawi: they are punishing Raif for thoughtcrime, and Thibodeau is harassing Ensaf, also for thoughtcrime. Totalitarians all. If Raif Badawi is murdered in Saudi Arabia, will Thibodeau pop the cork on a bottle of non-alcoholic champagne?
Another fascist, hard-Left “academic” Thomas Juneau, weighs in also in Thibodeau’s latest salvo, and also on Twitter:
“Ensaf Haidar says she is being unjustly ‘demonized,'” translated from “Ensaf Haidar dit être injustement ‘diabolisée,'” by Marc Thibodeau, La Presse, February 26, 2019:
Ensaf Haidar believes that she has been unfairly “demonized” because of the friendly ties she has established with an American author who has been denounced as an “extremist” by several organizations fighting against hate propaganda.
Saudi dissident Raif Badawi’s wife claims that an article from La Presse yesterday about her friendship with Robert Spencer was a “message to Islamists to attack” her.
She warned that she would hold the daily responsible for “any harm” to her safety, that of her children or that of her husband, who has been detained since 2012 in Saudi Arabia.
The Sherbrooke resident also criticized the credibility and conclusions of the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), which accuses Robert Spencer of stirring hatred against Muslims through his work.
She has also retweeted the writings of author and activist Djemila Benhabib, who has accused another organization critical of Spencer, the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), of being in the pay of fundamentalists. Ms. Benhabib serves as Vice President of the Raif Badawi Foundation.
Repressed by the English government
Ms. Haidar again refused yesterday to answer La Presse’s questions about her friendship with Mr. Spencer, whom she met especially during a visit to Washington a few weeks ago.
The American had been turned back by the British government in 2013 on the pretext that he was holding a speech on Islam likely to disrupt “intercommunity peace”.
The SPLC notes that he has spent a good part of his life producing books and articles aimed at “demonizing and mistreating Muslims and the Islamic faith”.
Spencer says he denounces “jihadist terror and sharia oppression” and has never written anything that encourages hatred “against anyone”.
The coordinator of the section of Amnesty International of Estrie, Mireille Elchacar, who has worked for a long time with Ms. Haidar, said yesterday that her organization did not have any advice to give her regarding her association with the American author.
“Ensaf is very happy to be able to use her Canadian citizenship and her freedom of expression” to put forward her beliefs, Ms. Elchacar noted.
After Radio-Canada quoted Amnesty International about it in an afternoon article, Haidar was outraged online.
“What are they trying to do? Why are they questioning Amnesty on this subject? I will also review my relationship with Radio-Canada! She wrote.
“Not a good idea”
Thomas Juneau, a Middle East specialist at the University of Ottawa, believes that Ms. Haidar’s friendship with Spencer is “not a good idea.”
The American author is unknown in Quebec, but “occupies a fairly important media space among far-right Islamophobes” south of the border, said Mr. Juneau.
“At the intellectual level, he should not be taken seriously at all. But he must be taken seriously at the political level,” notes Mr. Juneau, who is concerned that individuals like Mr. Spencer find online “a powerful megaphone” to disseminate their ideas.
“Like Islamophobes in general, he tends to amalgamate extremists with the daily, moderate practice of the vast majority of Muslims,” ​​he notes.
_____________________________________________________________

An interview with Raif Badawi’s daughter 

 MOTION CALLS ON COUNCIL TO AWARD RAIF BADAWI HONORARY MONTREAL CITIZENSHIP

Raif Badawi, Saudi blogger is still in prison

Despite the fact that the Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia (MBS) talks about reform and confrontation with extreme thoughts in his country, Raif Badawi is still in prison for criticizing the extremists.
INTERVIEW WITH ENGLISH SUBTITLES:
SEE ALSO:
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2019/02/fascist-journalist-patrick-
lagace-of-la-presse-continues-smearing-ensaf-haidar-for-meeting-
robert-spencer
EXCERPT:
"Even worse, La Presse has shown that it doesn’t care about Raif Badawi at all. 
By repeating SPLC/CAIR lies about me, and trying to tar Ensaf Haidar as an 
“Islamophobe” for meeting with me, they are making an all-out effort to 
intimidate Ensaf into silence and/or to get her Leftist supporters to drop support 
for her cause. This is what is the most despicable about this entire despicable 
episode: Patrick Lagacé, Marc Thibodeau, and La Presse would rather see Raif 
Badawi’s cause discredited (which they are working so hard to do) and Raif 
himself die in prison than allow Ensaf Haidar to stray from the politically correct 
reservation. This is the quintessential fascist impulse: dissidents must be crushed. 
I knew journalists were a contemptible bunch, but Lagacé, Thibodeau and their 
ilk are changing my view: I thought entirely too highly of them."
"Only silent acquiescence and dhimmitude, and constant respect for his jailers will free Raif Badawi, you see, in the expert opinion of Patrick Lagacé."