Translate

Saturday, March 9, 2019

U.S. FUNDED AFGHANISTAN GIVES $1 MILLION TO "PALESTINIANS"

U.S. FUNDED AFGHANISTAN GIVES $1 MILLION TO "PALESTINIANS" 
BY CHRISTINE DOUGLASS-WILLIAMS
SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2019/03/us-funded-afghanistan-gives-1000000-to-palestiniansrepublished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
From one jihad-supporting country to the next: a gift of a million dollars, courtesy of the infidels:
Afghanistan, which claims it would collapse without assistance from its top international donor the United States….pledged $1 million to the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) that provides assistance to Palestinian refugees while blasting President Donald Trump’s administration for suspending aid to the international body’s program.
Abdul Rahim Sayed, Afghanistan’s ambassador to Turkey, who presented the donation, also stated that “the Palestinian cause is a very noble cause for Afghan people. Whatever they could do for Palestinians, they will do it.”
Since  the early 2000s, it has been known that the UNRWA has been using its operations “as a cover for Palestinian militants, using UN ambulances to smuggle weapons to fighters and hosting terrorist meetings in UN buildings.”
Trump stated in a tweet last year:
@realDonaldTrump
“U.S.-Funded Afghanistan Gives $1 Million to U.N. Palestinian Program,” by Edwin Mora, Breitbart, March 4, 2019:
Afghanistan, which claims it would collapse without assistance from its top international donor the United States, on Sunday pledged $1 million to the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) that provides assistance to Palestinian refugees while blasting President Donald Trump’s administration for suspending aid to the international body’s program.
It appears that despite President Trump’s decision last year to cut funding for UNRWA — the main U.N. program for Palestinian refugees — some American taxpayer funds may find their way to the agency after all through Afghanistan.
As Afghanistan’s top international donor, the United States spends an estimated $3 billion per month on Afghanistan.
Afghan President Ashraf Ghani — who has periodically thanked the American taxpayer for their contribution to his country — warned in early 2018 that the Afghan army and Kabul government would collapse if the United States were to withdraw its financial support.
Nevertheless, the Ghani administration managed to find an extra $1 million lying around to help the U.N. Palestinian refugee program.
Abdul Rahim Sayed, Afghanistan’s ambassador to Turkey, presented the donation on Sunday to a UNRWA head in an event held in Istanbul. Turkey welcomed the donation.
Notwithstanding the financial difficulties and challenges facing Afghanistan, “Our president decided to support by responding to the call by President [Recep Tayyip] Erdogan,” Abdul Rahim Sayed, Afghanistan’s ambassador to Turkey, told the state-run Anadolu Agency (AA), adding:
This is a humanitarian cause. Humanitarian assistance is something which is responsibility of all human beings. Especially, the Islamic world should do it. If Afghanistan can do it [granting aid] in such a difficult time, everybody can do it.
“The Palestinian cause is a very noble cause for Afghan people. Whatever they could do for Palestinians, they will do it,” he added.
Amb. Sayed condemned the Trump administration for suspending aid to the U.N. Palestinian refugee program last year.
“We should not cut any support for humanitarian assistance. Palestinian refugees, children, they need support, and we should do it. Everybody should do it,” the envoy stressed.
At a cost of $350 million annually, the United States had been the UNRWA’s largest contributor by far before Trump ended funding for the agency last year. His decision came as part of an effort to reduce the number of Palestinians considered refugees, recalculate U.S. aid to match the president’s policies, and compel Palestinian politicians to drop or reduce the demand for “right of return” to land contested by Israel.
The Afghan envoy urged the international community, particularly Muslim countries, to play a role in supporting Palestinians.
In January, the UNRWA noted in a statement that it needed additional funding to provide assistance to about 5.4 million Palestinian refugees across the Middle East and maintain the agency’s operations at last year’s levels…..

POPULAR EVANGELICAL LEADER CALLS FOR JUSTICE DEPT. INVESTIGATION OF OMAR FOR LINKS TO MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD CHARITIES


POPULAR EVANGELICAL LEADER CALLS FOR JUSTICE DEPT. INVESTIGATION OF OMAR FOR LINKS TO MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD CHARITIES
BY CHRISTINE DOUGLASS-WILLIAMS
 republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
A popular evangelical leader and broadcaster, Laurie Cardoza-Moore, has had enough, like many who are witnessing the advance of the stealth jihad in Congress. Cardoza-Moore has launched a petition that being signed by tens of thousands of people, to have Ilhan Omar investigated by the Justice Department for connections to the Muslim Brotherhood. Omar’s ties to Hamas-linked CAIR are already well known.
Cardoza-Moore states of Omar: “While she has already established her credentials as a vehement anti-Semite, Ilhan Omar is far worse than that,” Cardoza-Moore said. “Omar may be in violation of a federal statute for fundraising for two Muslim Brotherhood charities that seek to destroy America.”
“Under 18 US Code § 2385, Advocating overthrow of Government” comes with a fine or imprisonment.
“Evangelical Leader: Ilhan Omar Violated Federal Statute Fundraising for Muslim Brotherhood Charities,” by David Israel, Jewish Press, March 7, 2019:
Evangelical leader Laurie Cardoza-Moore on Thursday called on the Justice Department to investigate Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) for possible connections to the radical Muslim Brotherhood.
Under 18 US Code § 2385, Advocating overthrow of Government, “whoever organizes or helps or attempts to organize any society, group, or assembly of persons who teach, advocate, or encourage the overthrow or destruction of any such government by force or violence; or becomes or is a member of, or affiliates with, any such society, group, or assembly of persons, knowing the purposes thereof-Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned…”
Cardoza-Moore, president of Proclaiming Justice to The Nations (PJTN) and host of the Christian television program Focus On Israel, with a weekly audience of more than a billion viewers in 200 countries, has launched a nationwide campaign—and a petition—demanding Omar’s dismissal from Congress.
“While she has already established her credentials as a vehement anti-Semite, Ilhan Omar is far worse than that,” Cardoza-Moore said. “Omar may be in violation of a federal statute for fundraising for two Muslim Brotherhood charities that seek to destroy America.”
“We the people demand that the Justice Department conduct a full and thorough investigation into her possible connections with the Muslim Brotherhood and its affiliates. Omar’s anti-Semitic comments do not reflect the values of Americans,” Cardoza-Moore declared, pointing to the recent revelation of Omar’s participation as a keynote speaker at events for the Muslim Brotherhood affiliated groups IRUSA and CAIR, which suggests her support for subversive factions aligned to destroy America and Western civilization itself.
Omar was a keynote speaker for Islamic Relief USA in Tampa, FL last month and will be keynote speaker at an upcoming Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) fundraiser in Los Angeles.
CAIR is the American arm of the Muslim Brotherhood, in addition to having close ties to Hamas and Hezbollah. CAIR was listed as an unindicted co-conspirator in the largest terrorist fundraising operation in the history of the United States known as the Holy Land Foundation Trial in 2009.
IRUSA is an arm of the largest Muslim fundraising group globally whose leaders have ties to terrorist groups.
The evangelical leader added: “American patriots have signed our petition in the tens of thousands. We won’t stop our national campaign until Ilhan Omar is fully investigated and justice is served….

NEW REPORT EXPOSES MOST INSANE LIBERAL CLASSES TAUGHT AT U.S. UNIVERSITIES

NEW REPORT EXPOSES MOST INSANE LIBERAL CLASSES TAUGHT AT U.S. UNIVERSITIES
SEE: http://the-trumpet-online.com/new-report-exposes-insane-liberal-classes-taught-us-universities/;  republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
March 8, 2019 (LifeSiteNews) – A new report exposes the radical leftist courses offered at universities across the U.S., which range from “Sex and Socialism” to “Cowboys, Gangsters, and Drag Kings: Introduction to Critical Masculinity Studies” to the “Gendered Politics of Food.”
Young America’s Foundation (YAF) has produced this report, Comedy & Tragedy, every year since 1995 to “document the intellectual abuse and flat-out indoctrination happening by way of the appalling curriculum at our country’s most (so-called) prestigious institutions of higher education.”
YAF spokesman Spencer Brown told LifeSiteNews that he was particularly struck by the proliferation of courses on Marxism, “eco-feminism,” and “queer environmentalism.”
He was also critical of the inclusion of feminist and leftist themes in mainstream religion courses.
There are classes on “queering God or queering the Bible,” Brown explained. “Those courses go into how, throughout history, God has been seen as definitively masculine or male, but they ask, ‘or is He?’”
These courses, said Brown, “dive into how the actions and the word and the character of God might actually suggest that He is a She from a feminist theology perspective.”
A number of Catholic universities made the list. DePaul University offers a class called “Sexual Justice: Lesbians, Gays and the Law,” which “examines the historical and contemporary relationships between lesbians, gays, and the law in the U.S., focusing on the intersections of power, sexuality, and identity with issues of sexuality-based discrimination.”
Georgetown has a class called “The Breast: Image, Myth, Legend,” for which no description was offered; Seton Hall University students have the option of enrolling in “The Politics of Marriage,” a topic which “requires careful attention as many important voices here (women and queer individuals in particular) are historically marginalized.”
Columbia University teaches students about “Practicing Intersectionality” while Brown University offers a course called “Black Lavender: Black Gay/Lesbian Plays/Dramatic Constructions in the American Theatre.”
“Many of the courses and descriptions listed in this year’s report may seem comical at first glance, but the situation that continues to unfold on America’s campuses is hardly a laughing matter,” Brown wrote in the report’s introduction. “Beyond the inane, identity- and intersectionality-obsessed topics, these classes advance a liberal agenda, malign conservatives and their values, and shut out ideological diversity.”
The methodology of YAF’s report included examinations of online course catalogs for college and university institutions ranging from the Big 10 Conference, the Ivy League, Big East Conference, and the Southeastern Conference. YAF says it regularly reviews and audits course catalogs, textbook requirements, commencement speakers, and other metrics in order to reveal the state of higher education.
The full report may be viewed here.

SECOND AMENDMENT SANCTUARY ZONES-TAKING BACK GROUND?

SECOND AMENDMENT SANCTUARY ZONES-
TAKING BACK GROUND?  
BY JEFF KNOX
SEE: https://www.ammoland.com/2019/03/second-amendment-sanctuary-cities/republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Arizona – -(AmmoLand.com)- Over the past year or so, extremist gun control laws have exploded in several states, primarily as a result of urban majorities riding roughshod over their rural neighbors.
Nowhere is this more evident than in Washington and Oregon, two states with historically liberal gun laws and low crime rates, that have been overwhelmed by a combination of growing urban populations and a sudden influx of cash from anti-rights billionaires.
Mike Bloomberg, with the help of Bill Gates and other ultra-wealthy Washingtonians, has funded a string of modest-sounding (but in reality extreme) gun control measures through Washington’s voter initiative process. The result: a once gun-friendly state suddenly in the running for the title of most firearm-restricted state in the country.
Oregon has gone a similar direction, but instead of initiatives, the assault on individual rights originated in that state’s Democrat-controlled legislature, again with the help of millions of dollars from Bloomberg and his pals. But the Northwest isn’t the only place the anti-gun ratchet has been turning. Illinois, where Chicago and its massive crime problem has long driven anti-gun efforts, is looking at statewide burdensome regulations on licensed dealers. New Mexico, and Nevada have also jumped on the gun control bandwagon with increasingly restrictive laws and legislative proposals.

Second Amendment Sanctuary Zones

In response, sheriffs, county commissioners, and city councils around the country have started passing “Second Amendment Sanctuary” resolutions, and declaring their intent to ignore and not enforce laws that violate the right to arms.
Unlike the “Sanctuary” designation adopted by cities, counties, and even states in opposition to enforcement of federal immigration laws, the Second Amendment Sanctuary movement isn’t pushing a local agenda over federal enforcement, but rather they are standing up for the supreme law of the land – the U.S. Constitution – over state laws that infringe on enumerated rights.
One of my favorite political commentators, Bill Whittle, recently voiced concern about the 2A Sanctuary movement on one of his Bill Whittle Now programs on YouTube.
His objection was that by using the “sanctuary” model, he feels that activists are falling into a trap by failing to take the fight to its source – the state legislature – to fix the problem, rather than be isolated and slowly walled off in smaller and smaller “rights enclaves.”

I would agree with him, if establishing small “freedom zones” were the final objective of the movement, but it’s not.

The 2A Sanctuary movement is not a final objective, but rather a tactic in the larger fight. The cities, towns, and counties take these positions, not as barricades to hide behind, but rather as declarations of war against their over-reaching legislators. They are rally points for lovers of freedom, where they can make plans for taking back their state legislatures and restoring the rule of the Constitution.
When an individual citizen stands up and declares “I will not comply” with laws they consider unconstitutional, that one small voice can be easily silenced. When many citizens band together and make the same declaration, they are a much louder voice that is much harder to silence. But when elected officials within a jurisdiction stand together with their fellow citizens and make the declaration on behalf of their constituents – and presumably with the support and approval of those constituents – it is a revolutionary statement that cannot be squelched or silenced. If these local politicians are indeed supported by their constituents, they will be reelected or elected to higher office, and the politicians who have pushed the unconstitutional laws will be turned out for their traitorous actions.
There’s no question that accepting unconstitutional laws as valid within the state, but not in some narrow jurisdiction, would be a serious mistake. Accepting evil for others, as long as rights are protected for me, is never acceptable. Drawing a line in the sand and declaring that creeping criminality shall not be tolerated beyond that line, and then pushing the line outward to encompass the entire state and nation, is exactly the right thing to do and is a noble effort. These local politicians – county board members, sheriffs, mayors and city council members, – are putting their careers, and in some cases their personal liberty, on the line in defense of what’s right, and they are leading the charge to rectify the wrong.
Nanny-state elitists and the sheeple who follow them in their high-rise apartment buildings and gated communities in Chicago, Seattle, Portland, and Las Vegas, must be turned out of office and their radical, anti-rights ideas rejected. That will only happen when large numbers of voters from across the states and nation stand up and take action – calling, writing, marching, and most importantly VOTING.
This is a war for liberty, and there is no neutral ground nor room for complacency. There is also no room for hiding behind “sanctuary” walls. The wrong must be thrown out and the right must prevail, and that is going to require active engagement on the part of all right-thinking Americans. We all must be willing to work toward better solutions, even when our options are limited and imperfect.
If you’re not familiar with Bill Whittle’s Firewall and Afterburner series, and his more recent Right Angel and Bill Whittle Now programs on YouTube, I highly recommend you check them out at BillWhittle.com



Jeff Knox
Jeff Knox

About Jeff Knox:
Jeff Knox is a second-generation political activist and director of The Firearms Coalition. His father Neal Knox led many of the early gun rights battles for your right to keep and bear arms. Read Neal Knox – The Gun Rights War.
The Firearms Coalition is a loose-knit coalition of individual Second Amendment activists, clubs and civil rights organizations. Founded by Neal Knox in 1984, the organization provides support to grassroots activists in the form of education, analysis of current issues, and with a historical perspective of the gun rights movement. The Firearms Coalition has offices in Buckeye, Arizona and Manassas, VA. Visit: www.FirearmsCoalition.org

_____________________________________________________________
SEE ALSO:

PJTN CALLS FOR BOYCOTT OF "AIRBNB" IN RESPONSE TO THEIR CORPORATE DECISION TO SUPPORT ANTI-SEMITIC BDS MOVEMENT

Pro-Israel Activist Calls for Boycott of Airbnb Over ...


PJTN CALLS FOR BOYCOTT OF "AIRBNB" IN RESPONSE TO THEIR CORPORATE DECISION TO SUPPORT 
ANTI-SEMITIC BDS MOVEMENT
SEE: https://www.pjtn.org/boycott_airbnbrepublished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
In response to the corporate decision by AIRBNB to discontinue the listings of vacation rentals in what it defines as “occupied territory” within the West Bank settlements, Proclaiming Justice to The Nations Founder and President Laurie Cardoza-Moore has today called for a boycott of the global provider’s rental destinations.
PJTN noted in a statement released November 26, 2018: “AIRBNB is the latest high profile business to cave to the egregious demands of the anti-Semitic BDS Movement targeting Israel. It’s open knowledge that Palestinian leaders had called for AIRBNB to remove the Israeli settlement listings three years ago –saying in a letter to the company –‘you are effectively promoting the illegal colonization of occupied land.’ Today, the PLO Secretary General called the listing removal ‘an initial positive step, adding, Israeli settlements are not just an obstacle to peace but defy the very definition of peace.’  Palestinian activists are jubilantly today declaring ‘Another Win for BDS’ on social media. Anti-Israel boycotts do not distinguish between the state of Israel and Judea and Samaria.  As far as Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) proponents are concerned; the entire state of Israel has no right to exist. This is not about disputed territories as AIRBNB has listings in Moroccan occupied West Sahara, Turkish occupied Cyprus and more,  it is only the Jewish properties in the Jewish homeland that are banned.  Let’s call it what it is: anti-Semitism.”
PJTN is calling upon Christians, Jews, and people of conscience worldwide to omit AIRBNB properties from their existing and future travel destination plans. “There are other well-established businesses such as VRBO (Vacation Rentals By Owners) that can provide great accommodations globally if business is re-directed to them. In short –we need to send to message that support of the BDS Movement and the anti-Semitism that leads to BDS will not be supported or tolerated and will result in lost revenues.”
_______________________________________________________________

Airbnb Caves to BDS

After pressure from BDS groups in the media, Airbnb caved and decided to remove its listings for Israeli settlement lodging in the West Bank. Heart of Israel Director Aaron Katsof discusses with host Jeff Smith.

Airbnb West Bank Withdrawal a Win for BDS?

Airbnb decided to withdraw its listings from the West Bank Palestinian territories, leaving Israeli settler businesses in the dust. Is this a win for BDS? Was it the right move? Former Peace Now Israel Director Yariv Oppenheimer and The Lawfare Project Founder Brooke Goldstein debate.

Ashton Kutcher Shuts Down BDS Anti-Israel Protester Ariel Gold at Airbnb Event


VACCINE MANDATES: IGNORING HUMAN RIGHTS & INFORMED CONSENT~SENATOR RAND PAUL FAVORS LIBERTY OVER VACCINE MANDATES; SAYS VACCINES GIVE A FALSE SENSE OF SECURITY

Anti-Vax Resistance
VACCINE MANDATES: IGNORING HUMAN RIGHTS & INFORMED CONSENT
BY Barbara C├íceres
SEE: https://thevaccinereaction.org/2019/03/vaccine-mandates-ignoring-human-rights-and-informed-consent/republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
The U.S. Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee held a hearing on Mar. 5, 2019 titled “Vaccines Save Lives: What is Driving Preventable Disease Outbreaks?”
The very title of the hearing tips the committee’s hand. “Vaccines save lives” is a conclusive statement that preemptively answers the question that follows, making it clear there would be no divergent exploration of the question of what is driving preventable disease outbreaks. Even further, while it is true that some vaccines may save some lives, it is also true that vaccines are not studied for their unintended long- and short-term effects on the body, and that many people’s bodies respond to vaccines in ways that prove harmful to them.
The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) has paid out more than $4 billion dollars for vaccine injuries since 1988.1 The passive reporting system for vaccine injuries, VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System), which captures between one and 10 percent of all adverse reactions,2 receives thousands of reports of injury every year.
If vaccines are saving lives, they are also doing it at the expense of those who are injured or killed by those same vaccines. Where is the “greater good” in that?
The testimonies of those elected to give witness in the Senate hearing all beat a predictable drum: more mandates for more vaccines to be given to more people. There was a push to curtail parental rights and eliminate vaccine exemptions to those vaccines. Who will be allowed to speak in Congress to the issue of human rights, the ethic of medical informed consent, and the right to bodily integrity and autonomy when it comes to vaccine mandates? The United States has confronted and repudiated the ugliness that comes with eugenics, utilitarianism, and medical experimentation in the labs at Tuskegee and the courts of Nuremberg following the horrors of Nazi medical experimentation on human subjects.
It is a violation of human rights to use people as guinea pigs in the great vaccine experiment, and it is immoral for the government to collude with the pharmaceutical companies through the use of vaccine mandates.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) now recommends 69 doses of 16 vaccines be given to children before age 18, with hundreds of vaccines in the pipeline. Many of these vaccines are fast-tracked for approval without adequate safety studies, and each carries both known and unknown risks. Although it is currently in fashion to think otherwise, the science is not settled on vaccines. There is not adequate testing on vaccines to make assurances of safety (new vaccines are usually tested against other vaccines, not inert placebos), and there has never been a true scientifically credible study of those who are vaccinated compared to those who are completely unvaccinated.
Vaccines are a medical intervention given to healthy people that carry a risk of death and serious or debilitating consequences for some individuals. Because of this risk, there must always be choice!
There was no one on the panel of witnesses at the Mar. 5 Senate hearing who gave a voice to that point of view. Why was Barbara Loe Fisher of the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC), a longtime advocate of vaccine safety and an expert on vaccine policy and informed consent, not called to testify? Why was a high school student who has spoken with friends and done a bit of Google research asked to participate in a hearing of such serious magnitude when parents of vaccine injured children—people who vaccinated their children in good faith and paid a horrible price—have been left out of the conversation?
If we applaud this child’s right to make medical choices, shouldn’t the choice of informed parents who have come to a different conclusion also be included? Are we abandoning the fundamental American value of intelligent dissent in favor of totalitarianism? 
It’s hard not to conclude that this hearing was set up as a one-sided, unfair and incomplete conversation with a pre-determined outcome. Shame. 
I will close with the words of Dr. Christine Stabell Benn, a vaccine researcher and Professor of Global Health at the University of Southern Denmark. Dr. Benn’s opinion was published in The Times of London on Mar. 2, 2019 in response to a previous article about vaccine hesitancy…
As a vaccine researcher, I strongly oppose mandatory vaccination. The vaccines that are in use were only tested for effects on the vaccine-targeted disease and on side effects in relation to the vaccination. However, there is increasing evidence that vaccines also affect the immune system broadly, reducing or enhancing susceptibility to unrelated diseases. Hence, the vaccine skeptics have a right to point out that we do not know the full effects of vaccines on overall health. It should therefore be a human right to weigh pros, cons and unknowns to make one’s own decision.3

 References:
1 Health Resources & Services Administration. Vaccine Injury Compensation Data. HRSA.gov.2 National Vaccine Information Center. Can Measles Vaccine Cause Injury & Death? NVIC.org.
3 Stabell Benn C. Times Letters: Immunisation science and ‘vaccine hesitancy’The Times Mar. 2, 2019.
___________________________________________________________

Sen. Rand Paul Says Vaccines Give a False Sense of Security

SEE: https://thevaccinereaction.org/2019/03/sen-rand-paul-says-vaccines-give-a-false-sense-of-security/republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
It is wrong to say that there are no risks to vaccines. Even the government admit that children are sometimes injured by vaccines. Since 1988, over $4 billion has been paid out from the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. Despite the government admitting to in paying $4 billion for vaccine injuries, no informed consent is used or required when you vaccinate your child. This may be the only medical procedure in today’s medical world where an informed consent is not required.
_____________________________________________________

Sen. Rand Paul Favors Liberty Over Vaccine Mandates

SEE: https://thevaccinereaction.org/2019/03/sen-rand-paul-favors-liberty-over-vaccine-mandates/republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
U.S. Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky expressed his opposition to government mandates forcing people to vaccinate themselves and their children. At a hearing of the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee on Mar. 5, 2019, he was the only Senator or invited witness at the hearing who made a statement urging caution about the creation of vaccine laws that contain no personal belief exemptions.
Sen. Paul said, “As we contemplate forcing parents, I think it’s important to remember that force is not consistent with the American story. Nor is force consistent with the liberty our forefathers sought when they came to America.”1 2
Sen. Paul, who is a medical doctor, noted that vaccines come with some risk and that at least for that reason people should have a choice as to whether to be vaccinated. He noted, “It is wrong to say that there are no risks to vaccines. Even the government admits that children are sometimes injured by vaccines.” Since the federal Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) created by Congress under the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA) began operating in 1988, more than $4 billion has been paid to vaccine victims by the government.1 2
Sen. Paul appeared concerned about the relative lack of informed consent accorded to parents when it comes to vaccinating their children. He said, “Despite the government admitting to paying $4 billion for vaccine injuries, no informed consent is used or required when you vaccinate your child. This may be the only medical procedure in today’s medical world where an informed consent is not required.”1
One of the problems Sen. Paul sees with government mandates with regard to childhood vaccines such as the MMR (measles, mumps and rubella) is the precedence they set for other vaccines. “Are we to find that next we’ll be mandating flu vaccines?” asked Paul.”1 He warned:
I would guess that those who want to mandate measles [vaccine] will be after us on the flu next. Yet, the current science only allows for educated guessing when it comes to the flu vaccine. Each year, before that year’s flu strain is known, scientists put their best guess into that year’s vaccine. Some years it’s completely wrong. We vaccinate for the wrong strain of flu… Yet, five states already mandate flu vaccines. Is it really appropriate to mandate a vaccine that, more often than not, vaccinates for the wrong flu strain?1
Sen. Paul said he did not “favor giving up on liberty for a false sense of security.”1 2
References:
1 C-SPAN. Word for Word: Sen. Rand Paul says vaccines give a false sense of security. YouTube (published Mar. 5, 2019)
2 Sonmez F. Sen. Rand Paul says government should not force people to receive vaccination. The Washington Post Mar. 5, 2019.

___________________________________________________________
SEE ALSO:
https://www.ammoland.com/2019/03/anti-vax-resistance/
___________________________________________________________

VACCINE TRUTHERS FACE AN INQUISITION


The establishment is fomenting a major battle of the vaccination debate


BOSTON GLOBE EDITORIAL ACCUSES DAVID HOROWITZ, PRO-TRUMP JEWS OF BEING NAZIS

BOSTON GLOBE EDITORIAL ACCUSES DAVID HOROWITZ, PRO-TRUMP JEWS OF BEING NAZIS
BY DANIEL GREENFIELD
SEE: https://www.frontpagemag.com/point/273084/boston-globe-editorial-accuses%C2%A0david-horowitz-pro-daniel-greenfieldrepublished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Placing an op-ed piece in even a local newspaper is really hard. It's not hard if you're a leftist, but it's an uphill struggle if you're a conservative. Meanwhile, major papers will run any crazy, defamatory, hate-filled rant as long as it's from the left attacking the right.
At a time when the Democrats are mainstreaming anti-Semitism, the Boston Globe decided to run a hit piece headlined, "A shocking number of Jews have become willing collaborators in white supremacy".
The author, S.I. Rosenbaum, hates Israel, Jews and defends anti-Semitism. In a Twitter thread about her Boston Globe hate piece, she tweeted, "I was going to write about how light-skinned Jews can't afford to break with allies of color over antisemitic microaggressions, because our only hope of survival as a people is ride-or-die coalition with other minority groups."
S.I. Rosenbaum also thanked her editor for encouraging her to go all out on this. And go all out she did.
The deranged hate-filled rant by S.I. Rosenbaum accuses Jewish Trump supporters of being Nazis. And pretty much all Republicans.
"A shocking number of Jews have become willing collaborators in white supremacy — not only public bigots such as Ben Shapiro and David Horowitz, but kapos in the openly ethno-nationalist Trump regime, such as Stephen Miller or Jared Kushner," S.I. Rosenbaum rants.
The accusations aimed at Horowitz and Shapiro are vile and disgusting. But the context is that, according to S.I. Rosenbaum, anyone who isn't a member of a leftist anti-Semitic hate group, like Black Lives Matter or the PFLP, is a Nazi.
It's the same propaganda that Soviet apologists used to justify Stalin's mass murder of Jews while calling any Jewish opponents of Communism, Nazis. These are the same people who claimed that Communist anti-Semitic cartoons of hook-nosed Jews wrapped in stars of David were no big deal. Now they're out in force defending Rep. Omar's anti-Semitism.
If anyone is a Kapo, it's leftists who insist on diverting money to the Muslim terrorists who are literally paid for every Jew they kill.
But S.I. Rosenbaum of course doesn't stop until she reaches a defense of actual Stalinism, which was responsible or the mass murder of countless Jews in gulags.
"In doing so, Cohen was following in the footsteps of Roy Cohn, Trump’s old mentor. Cohn had been Joseph McCarthy’s right hand in the Red Scare witch hunt of the 1950s, the lawyer who helped send Julius and Ethel Rosenberg to the electric chair, a gay Jew who sold out Jews and homosexuals without a second thought," S.I. Rosenbaum writes, celebrating two Communist spies serving an anti-Semitic regime whose actions helped bring the world closer to total destruction.
These are S.I. Rosenbaum's heroes.
Then, because the Boston Globe has fewer standards than Tumblr or MSNBC, S.I. Rosenbaum accuses Justice Thomas and Ben Carson of being white supremacists.
"Other minorities make this bargain too, sometimes — look at Ben Carson and Clarence Thomas," S.I. Rosenbaum rants.
So the Boston Globe finds it appropriate to run a piece falsely accusing Jews... and some of the most talented black men in this country, of being white supremacists with no evidence other than the author's bad chemicals and worse ideology.
Stalinist nuclear spies are heroes. David Horowitz is a white supremacist. Just like Ben Carson.
Pravda had higher standards for its raving bigotry and anti-Semitism than the Boston Globe does.

VET WIDOW, 84, THREATENED WITH EVICTION FOR HOSTING BIBLE STUDIES

84-Year-Old Widow Threatened with Eviction for Holding ...
VET WIDOW, 84, THREATENED WITH EVICTION 
FOR HOSTING BIBLE STUDIES

The home claims it needs to protect residents from this elderly widow, says legal defense institute

BY KIT DANIELS
SEE: https://www.infowars.com/vet-widow-84-threatened-with-eviction-for-hosting-bible-studies/republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
An 84-year-old widow of a veteran is being threatened with eviction for hosting voluntary Bible studies, according to the Pacific Justice Institute.
The widow, Artis Breau, received a letter from the California Department of Veterans Affairs (CalVet) demanding that she cease hosting the Bible studies or else she will be thrown out of her veteran’s home.
“The home claims it needs to protect residents from this elderly widow, even though attendance at her Bible studies is entirely voluntary,” the institute stated. “Artis has explained to PJI that the real issue is that she is an evangelical Jewish believer in Jesus, which does not sit well with some of the chaplains.”
Breau, whose late husband served in the Korean War, initially took heat from the home last September over a discussion she had with another resident about Heaven and Hell which officials claimed had caused that resident to “lose sleep” and was thus “elder abuse.”
Breau was banned from volunteer work at the home over the complaint despite not yet being interviewed over the allegation, the institute stated.
“CalVet’s treatment of this widow is shameful,” PJI stated in a press release. “Throughout this process, we have been deeply disturbed not only by the lack of constitutional guidelines, ineptitude, and lack of due process in the investigation, but even more by the notion that discussing religious views on the eternal state of the soul is somehow elder abuse or emotional abuse.”
“Our client’s husband fought for his country to preserve the freedoms now being threatened by CalVet. Our veterans deserve better.”
Responding to the allegations, CalVet said that “the safety, security, and well-being of all of our residents is our top priority.”
“We are very proud of the religious services provided to all of our residents through our chaplaincy services,” said the deputy secretary of Women Veterans Affairs at CalVet, according to Fox News. “This investigation concerns the private conduct of an individual.”
“Beyond that, we are unable to comment on an ongoing investigation.”