Translate

Thursday, February 20, 2020

SEXUALLY PERVERSE PROPAGANDA IN SAM ALLBERRY'S NEW BOOK: "WHY DOES GOD CARE WHO I SLEEP WITH?"~SUPPORTED BY RAVI ZACHARIAS & SOUTHERN BAPTIST LEADERS

 Sam Allberry is a pastor, regular conference speaker, global speaker for Ravi Zacharias International Ministries, editor for the Gospel Coalition, and visiting professor at Cedarville University. He is the author of a number of books, including Is God Anti-Gay?; Why Bother with Church?; and 7 Myths about Singleness.
He has written extensively for numerous organizations, including The Gospel Coalition, Desiring God, Ravi Zacharias International Ministries, and Living Out.
SEXUALLY PERVERSE PROPAGANDA 
IN SAM ALLBERRY'S NEW BOOK: 
"WHY DOES GOD CARE WHO I SLEEP WITH?"
FORCING THE ISSUE OF SAME SEX UNIONS 
IN THE SOUTHERN BAPTIST CHURCHES 
Why can't Christians just let people love who they love? Sam Allberry talks more about this in his new book, "Why Does God Care Who I Sleep With?" Pre-order your copy here: http://thegoodbook.com/sleep
BROUGHT TO YOU BY APOSTATE 
RAVI ZACHARIAS' YOUTUBE CHANNEL:
ALLBERRY: 
"WHAT IF GOD CREATED TRANSGENDER PEOPLE?" (HE DIDN'T!)
"FEELING WE'RE SOME KIND OF MIX"

If God Made Me This Way, How Can It Be Wrong?

When talking about sexual ethics, some people say, “If God made me the way I am, then how can it be wrong?” Sam Allberry talks more about this in his new book, "Why Does God Care Who I Sleep With?"
SEE OUR PREVIOUS POST:
Mohler’s full support of the same-sex attracted narrative is also shown in his promotion of the book “Is God anti-gay?” written by Sam Allberry, a same-sex attracted priest in the Church of England. Allberry has publicly described himself as having “sexual, romantic and deep emotional attractions to people of the same sex,” and his book claims to offer a positive and liberating way forward for the same-sex attracted. Mohler applauds the ministry of Allberry and stresses that his book is full of “biblical wisdom.”
THE ONE HOUR DOCUMENTARY:
The purpose of this video is to evaluate the teaching of Dr Albert Mohler, president of the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, on the subject of homosexuality. Mohler is encouraging the Church to embrace the issue of sexual orientation, a psychological concept that is entirely without biblical warrant. He accuses evangelicals of having lied about the nature of homosexuality and of practicing a form of homophobia. He fully supports the ministry of same-sex attracted Sam Allberry, a Church of England priest. His position is similar to that of the gay agenda, which seeks to normalize homosexuality in society and the Church.
MOHLER, ALLBERRY & MOORE: "TOGETHER", 
BUT IT'S NOT THE TRUE GOSPEL!

SEX SLAVERY: AN ISLAMIC SACRAMENT?

SEX SLAVERY: AN ISLAMIC SACRAMENT? 
ISIS may have popularized it, 
but concubinage is integral to Islam
BY RAYMOND IBRAHIM
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research 
purposes:
Raymond Ibrahim is a Shillman Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center.
Is the sexual enslavement of non-Muslim women an Islamic State idea or merely an Islamic idea?
First, lest there is any doubt that ISIS members were not only convinced that it was their Islamic right to sexually enslave “infidels,” but that doing so was pious, consider this account from 2015: “In the moments before he raped the 12-year-old [non-Muslim] girl, the Islamic State fighter took the time to explain that what he was about to do was not a sin. Because the preteen girl practiced a religion other than Islam, the Quran not only gave him the right to rape her — it condoned and encouraged it, he insisted.”  “He said that by raping me,” recalled the 12-year-old, “he is drawing closer to God.”
Every time that he came to rape me, he would pray,” explained another girl, aged 15. “He said that raping me is his prayer to God. I said to him, ‘What you’re doing to me is wrong, and it will not bring you closer to God.’ And he said, ‘No, it’s allowed. It’s halal.’”
Such claims are of course consistent with a Q&A pamphlet on the topic published by the Islamic State in 2015: 
Question 1: What is al-sabi?
Al-Sabi is a woman from among ahl al-harb [the “people of war,” meaning un-subjugated non-Muslims] who has been captured by Muslims.
Question 2: What makes al-sabi permissible?
What makes al-sabi permissible [i.e., what makes it permissible to take such a woman captive] is [her] unbelief. Unbelieving [women] who were captured and brought into the abode of Islam are permissible to us, after the imam distributes them [among us].
Question 3: Can all unbelieving women be taken captive?
There is no dispute among the scholars that it is permissible to capture unbelieving women [who are characterized by] original unbelief [kufr asli], such as the kitabiyat [women from among the People of the Book, i.e., Jews and Christians] and polytheists. However, [the scholars] are disputed over [the issue of] capturing apostate women. The consensus leans toward forbidding it, though some people of knowledge think it permissible. We [ISIS] lean toward accepting the consensus….
Question 4: Is it permissible to have intercourse with a female captive?
It is permissible to have sexual intercourse with the female captive. Allah the almighty said: “[Successful are the believers] who guard their chastity, except from their wives or (the captives and slaves) that their right hands possess, for then they are free from blame [Koran 23:5–6].”…
Question 5: Is it permissible to have intercourse with a female captive immediately after taking possession [of her]?
If she is a virgin, he [her master] can have intercourse with her immediately after taking possession of her. However, if she isn’t, her uterus must be purified [first]….
An important question arises at this juncture: Are these beliefs based on ISIS’s own interpretation of Islam—as we are repeatedly told by the “experts”—or are they based on standard Islamic teachings?  
Evidence clearly indicates the latter.  Most recently, for instance, on February 2, 2020,  Reuters reported that “The man shot dead by police after wounding two people in a stabbing spree on a busy London street… described Yazidi women as slaves and said the Koran made it permissible to rape them.”  A few weeks earlier, in late December, African migrants in Paris “repeatedly cited Allah, the Koran, and Mecca,” while raping a minor girl in Paris (original).  One can go on and on; consider just the following quotes limited to the ongoing sex grooming scandals in the UK:
  • Muslim abusers quoted Qur’an as they beat me,” said one of countless rape victims.
  • The men who did this to me have no remorse,” said another victim of her Muslim rapists. “They would tell me that what they were doing was OK in their culture.”
  • A Muslim convicted of rape confessed that sharing non-Muslim girls for sex was “a religious requirement.”
None of these men were ISIS members; they were just Muslims.  If they shared the same outlook concerning the sexual bondage of non-Muslim women, that is because Islam—not the Islamic State, a byproduct—promotes it.
Here, for example, is how the late American professor Majid Khadduri (1909-2007), “internationally recognized as one of the world’s leading authorities on Islamic law and jurisprudence,” politely touched on the topic—and only in the past tense, as if to say this is how Muslims once behaved but no longer.  From his War and Peace in the Law of Islam:
The term spoil (ghanima) is applied specifically to property acquired by force from non-Muslims. It includes, however, not only property (movable and immovable) but also persons, whether in the capacity of asra (prisoners of war) or sabi (women and children). … If the slave were a woman, the master was permitted to have sexual connection with her as a concubine.
“Spoils of war” is certainly correct.  As one human rights activist said while discussing a Muslim man’s rape of a 9-year-old Christian girl in Pakistan: “Such incidents occur frequently. Christian girls are considered goods to be damaged at leisure. Abusing them is a right. According to the community’s mentality it is not even a crime. Muslims regard them as spoils of war.”
Moreover, seeing and treating non-Muslim women as “spoils of war” is not just limited to the words of old religious texts or “extremist” groups.  It was a primary feature of—and often motivation for—over a millennium of war on the non-Muslim world (15 million Europeans alone were enslaved, many—including men and boys—for sexual purposes).
All this is also a reminder that ISIS should not be instantly rejected—as it always is by the Western establishment—as an authority on Islamic topics.  Indeed, and as the rest of its Q&A pamphlet on sex slavery makes clear, ISIS so meticulously follows the arcane minutia of sharia as to maintain an odd veneer of “morality”—there are a number of restrictions—and even goes so far as to indicate that freeing slaves is a virtuous act (Q&A 27).
The real difference between ISIS and other Muslims is that the former is, refreshingly, very forthright concerning the teachings of Islam (as when they made clear that their hate for the Western world is based on sharia, not grievances, even though the latter paradigm has long worked as a cover for Islamic terror groups, as al-Qaeda well knew). 
I am reminded of an old Arabic language program, where the hostess asked two prominent Muslim clerics: “According to sharia, is slave-sex still applicable?” The two ulema refused to give a clear answer — dissembling here, going off on tangents there.  When she pressed the issue, one of the clerics stormed off the set.  He eventually returned, and the hostess politely explained her incessant questioning: “Ninety percent of Muslims, including myself, do not understand the issue of sex slavery in Islam and are having a hard time swallowing it,” she implored, to which the sheikh closed the matter by replying, “You don’t need to understand!”
At any rate, from here it becomes clear why so many Muslim men—above and beyond ISIS card-carrying members—see and treat “infidel” women in Europe and elsewhere as “pieces of meat”.  As the all-important answer to the third question in the ISIS pamphlet correctly states:  “There is no dispute among the scholars that it is permissible to capture unbelieving women [who are characterized by] original unbelief [kufr asli, meaning they were born as non-Muslims], such as the kitabiyat [women from among the People of the Book, i.e., Jews and Christians] and polytheists.” 
Such is the impact of the Islamic “sacrament” captured in Koran (4:323: 5-6, etc.): all non-Muslim women—be they atheists, Christians, Jews, polytheists, wiccans et al—are free game for abducting and enslaving.  They exist, quite simply, for the “pleasure of Muslim men,” as a would-be rapist once told a reluctant Christian girl before murdering her.

BLOOMBERG'S "LEVERAGED BUYOUT" OF SECOND AMENDMENT CONTINUES; "EVERYTOWN" SPENDS $8 MILLION IN TEXAS

Dana Loesch asserts that Michael Bloomberg created anti-gun fake news site The Trace because he couldn’t get anyone but the New York Times to report on his and Everytown’s fake gun statistics.
BLOOMBERG'S "LEVERAGED BUYOUT" 
OF SECOND AMENDMENT CONTINUES; "EVERYTOWN" SPENDS $8 MILLION IN TEXAS 
BY ALAN GOTTLIEB
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research 
purposes:
BELLEVUE, WA – -(AmmoLand.com)- Anti-gun billionaire Michael Bloomberg is continuing what appears to be an attempted “leveraged buyout” of the Second Amendment as Everytown for Gun Safety—the group he co-founded and bankrolled—has pledged to spend $8 million in Texas; just part of the $60 million that group has vowed to spend in order to elect anti-rights politicians this fall.
That’s the observation from the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms. Former New York City Mayor Bloomberg, seeking to buy his way into the White House by running for president as a Democrat, has weaponized his vast wealth to buy an election.

But CCRKBA Chairman Alan Gottlieb is reminding Bloomberg that the U.S. Constitution is not for sale.

“Michael Bloomberg is spending a fortune on his Johnny-come-lately presidential campaign,” Gottlieb said, “but the one prize he really seems to want—a chance to turn America into his kingdom—will prove to be beyond even his financial reach. He’s tried to tell us what to eat, he’s tried to tell us how much soda we can drink and he has been unrelenting in his crusade to erase the Second Amendment from the Bill of Rights.
“But Bloomberg can’t buy American liberty,” he continued, “because Americans aren’t willing to sell. He has amassed great wealth, but that doesn’t give him the right to say nobody else has any rights. And we’re certain that the more Bloomberg talks and the more he spends, the more people will realize this man should not be trusted with the future of the United States.
“The Everytown Action Fund pledge to spend ‘at least’ $60 million to elect gun prohibitionists to public office at all levels should alarm, if not terrify, every American voter,” Gottlieb added.

“This is the United States of America, not the United Kingdom of Bloomberg, and we should be wary of anybody willing to spend so much money in an effort to put people in office at all levels of government who are politically indebted to a single wealthy demagogue.”

“If Mike Bloomberg thinks he sees a pricetag on America,” Gottlieb concluded, “he shouldn’t run for election, he should run to the nearest doctor for an eye exam, because he’s seeing something that isn’t there.”

Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear ArmsWith more than 650,000 members and supporters nationwide, the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms (www.ccrkba.org) is one of the nation's premier gun rights organizations. As a non-profit organization, the Citizens Committee is dedicated to preserving firearms freedoms through active lobbying of elected officials and facilitating grass-roots organization of gun rights activists in local communities throughout the United States.
______________________________________________________________
SEE ALSO:
https://www.ammoland.com/2020/02/intercepted-everytowns-big-bucks-beg-to-flip-texas/#axzz6EgWreqpU
https://www.ammoland.com/2020/02/idahos-gun-owners-protest-michael-bloomberg-in-boise/#axzz6EVLRDMCK
________________________________________________

Bloomberg Names His New Target...TEXAS

PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP'S SPEECH AT KEEP AMERICA GREAT RALLY IN PHOENIX, ARIZONA

PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP'S SPEECH AT KEEP AMERICA GREAT RALLY IN PHOENIX, ARIZONA

CHARISMATIC SBC LEADER, DWIGHT MCKISSIC, SAYS OPPOSING FEMALE PASTORS IS ‘GENDER LYNCHING’

William Dwight McKissic, Sr. (born 1958) is a prominent African-American Southern "Baptist minister from Pine Bluff, Arkansas. He is the founder and current senior pastor of Cornerstone Baptist Church in Arlington, Texas. McKissic is a controversial leader of the Bapticostal movement, marked by rejection of cessationism and support of the charismatic gifts. He has also made several controversial statements, specifically about homosexuality and divine wrath." 
SEE:
EXCERPT:
"This isn’t the first time McKissic racialized an SBC problem. He trotted out racial grievances to defend conservative critiques of ERLC head Russell Moore. Moore, a Never Trumper and former Democratic congressional staffer, naturally finds a defender in McKissic—a pastor who voted for abortion supporting Hillary Clinton over Trump and admits to voting against Mitt Romney."
EXCERPT:
"Dwight McKissic is an African American charismatic (and leftist) preacher who – for some reason – is a Southern Baptist. McKissic regularly capitalizes on the color of his skin to obtain for himself notoriety and attention, especially through resolutions presented at the SBC’s annual convention designed to cause racial disunity and controversy. A huge fan of progressive liberal, Russell Moore, McKissic is a regular presence in the blogosphere and pushes his radical and racist agenda in Southern Baptist circles."
"Few in the Southern Baptist world are willing to call McKissic what he is – a racist and race baiter who is savagely committed to socialist, liberal and Cultural Marxist ideals. We’ve written about McKissic in the past: The Color of Money in the SBC: Dwight McKissic and the Economics of Race BaitingThe Salt of the Earth: A Rejoinder to Dwight McKissic and Dave Miller and Others Who Twist This VerseRace Baiting and the ERLC: Dwight McKissic Defends Russell Moore and Demonstrates Why Eliminating the ERLC is the Best Course of ActionIs Truth Racist: A Response to Dwight McKissic, and more."
SBC LEADER SAYS OPPOSING FEMALE PASTORS IS ‘GENDER LYNCHING’
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research 
purposes:
Dwight McKissic, a token black figure in the Southern Baptist Convention who terrorizes 
every annual convention with race-baiting resolutions, says that being against female pastors
 is “gender lynching.”
McKissic, who helped foment ungodly domestic terrorism during the Ferguson riots and railed against police officers, also voted for Hillary Clinton because of “other pro-life issues” besides abortion (like the Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission (ERLC), McKissic has redefined “pro-life” to mean anything and everything but ending abortion).
In wake of the controversy caused by a gay-affirming SBC pastors conference president inviting a female pastor, Hosanna Wong, to perform at the event, liberal Southern Baptists like McKissic are claiming that conservative sentiment is tantamount to a hate crime.
Hosanna Wong official title is, Network Associate Pastor of Teaching. James Grogan is listed as Senior Pastor. Another male is listed as Executive Pastor, according to the church’s website. Disinviting Sis Wong from a nonpreaching speaking role, is tantamount to gender lynching.
— Dwight McKissic (@pastordmack) February 13, 2020
Of course, McKissic wouldn’t have a problem is Wong had a preaching role, either. He debated Tom Ascol on female pastors and preachers last year (in the affirmative).
Lynching, a volatile term steeped in racism, is a reference to 3,446 blacks hung by a rope between 1882 and 1968 (1,297 whites were also lynched during that time period).
Engaging in “catastrophizing,” a key component of snowflake culture, McKissic and David Uth – the gay-affirming pastor who invited Wong – are insinuating that critics of female pastors might cause actual physical harm.
Uth had claimed that criticism of female pastors could put Wong in “danger.”
McKissic was recently a highly celebrated guest speaker at the church of ERLC official, Bart Barber.
_____________________________________________________________

Drama At The Southern Baptist 

Convention Over Resolution Condemning White Supremacy, Alt-Right

June 16, 2017
McKissic Speaks