Wednesday, September 21, 2016


SEE: below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

Fellowship with darkness is no stranger to Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary. It was the president of this Southern Baptist seminary, Paige Patterson, that once enrolled a practicing Muslim into the seminary. It seems as though this seminary prides itself on its diversity–you know, the 2 Corinthians 6:14 (ESV) kind that Paul warns against:
Do not be unequally yoked with unbelievers. For what partnership has righteousness with lawlessness? Or what fellowship has light with darkness?
On October 27, 2016, a famous TV star will be carted in to address the chapel at Southwestern. Reverend Alan Robertson, known for his appearances on Duck Dynasty as the clan’s pastor, will be available to proclaim his version of the Gospel to the students. Alan Robertson and the Duck Dynasty clan are members of White’s Ferry Road Church (WFR). White’s Ferry Road Church is a part of the Church of Christ denomination which arose out of the restoration movement over a century ago. The Church of Christ denomination has long held to the heresy of baptismal justification–that the act of baptism is essential to salvation. According to WFR’s statement of faith found on their website, they believe the following regarding salvation:
WE BELIEVE that salvation is by grace through faith in the gospel. God showed us His grace through Jesus’ death, burial and resurrection. It is that message that calls people to believe the gospel and its power to save, turn from their sins, confess Jesus as Lord, and be immersed in water, reenacting the death, burial and resurrection. This is the message that was preached in the first century beginning with Acts 2 and how the people responded to this message.
The denomination’s statement of faith affirms the belief in the necessity of salvation by faith and baptism. Further, you can also see a video of Phil Robertson, another leading member of the Duck Dynasty clan, and an elder at WFR Church, explain the church’s belief regarding baptism confirming its necessity for salvation.
You might ask, “what’s the harm here?” We’re sure the majority of students at Southwestern Seminary would agree that baptism has no power to save and that the belief in the necessity of baptism for salvation is, in essence, a denial of Christ’s finished work on the cross–a damnable heresy. The bigger question, however, remains unanswered: what fellowship has light with darkness?
What could possibly be the benefit of bringing in Alan Robertson, a man who clearly denies the saving power of Christ’s finished work on the cross, to address the students at a Southern Baptist Seminary? Are they bringing him in to debate the merits of his false Gospel, and expose his heresies? Unlikely. The likely reason is this: it attracts people.
Let’s just be real for a moment, shall we? Paige Patterson knows full well that Alan Robertson believes in baptismal justification. He also knows that this false gospel has no power to save. But I suspect he also believes that these unfortunate facts do not outweigh the perceived benefits of attracting large amounts of professing Christians. By bringing in a conservative television hero, the seminary can say “hey, look at us. We’re relevant, we’re cool, join us, send us money.”
You adulterous people! Do you not know that friendship with the world is enmity with God? Therefore whoever wishes to be a friend of the world makes himself an enemy of God. – James 4:4 (ESV)



Monday, June 17, 2013


republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

One of the most basic devices used in ancient pagan spirituality is the “circle of protection.” You find it everywhere from the Eastern mystery religions to modern witchcraft. The circle of protection was commonly used in old Gypsy magic, as it was thought to create an impenetrable barrier of protection around those in which it was created.
This “magic” circle, spiritual in nature, could be something physical, such as lines drawn in the dirt or sand, or even a sprinkling of salt. But they could also be imaginary. On page 43 of Gypsy Magic: A Romany Book of Spells, Charms, and Fortune-Telling by Patrinella Cooper, she says
A similar exercise can be done at any time when you are feeling uneasy or before you go to sleep at night. Visualise the blue line of fire. In your mind’s eye, slowly draw its vibrant protective beam around yourself, your bed, or your property. Try to imagine every detail of its path until it finally closes in a protective circle.
Creating a circular boundary is an ancient form of spiritual protection. The space within the circle becomes consecrated ground. The circle itself becomes a barrier keeping all unwelcomed things at bay.
The use of this protective circle and other forms of witchcraft have been an integral part of Gypsy spiritual life and culture since the earliest foundations. It’s quite common for cultural traditions to be carried over from generation to generation, even when other religions, including Christianity, become an accepted or even prominent expression of spirituality. One famous Gypsy from the late 19th century and early 20th century, named Rodney “Gipsy” Smith, is widely regarded as a great Christian evangelist and revivalist from England. The practice of integrating the Gypsy witchcraft circle of protection into Christianity is widely attributed to Smith. When asked of Smith how to start a revival, he replied:
Find a piece of chalk, and find an empty room. Go into that room and shut the door. Draw a circle on the floor with that chalk, kneel down in that circle, and ask God to start revival right there.
Of course, this practice of circle-making can be found nowhere in Scripture. This is purely a pagan practice that Mr. Smith adapted from his cultural upbringing to fit with his newly found Christianity. So does this practice of circle-making by Mr. Smith really have anything to do with the ancient Pagan circles of the Gypsies?
Perhaps the most prominent figure in modern day evangelicalism who promotes the practice of “prayer circles” is Mark Batterson. Batterson attempts to trace his practice of circle-making back to Gipsy Smith. Batterson writes:
The goal of Draw the Circle: The 40-Day Prayer Challenge is to help readers establish a daily prayer habit with a daily dose of prayer inspiration.  It picks up where The Circle Maker left off, with the story of Gipsy Smith. Then it shares new stories and new learnings in prayer that will inspire you to dream big, pray hard, and think long!
Batterson also writes in an articleSeven Prayer Circles for Parents,
In Praying Circles Around The Lives of Your Children I share seven tips, seven circles. They range from praying a hedge of protection around your kids to making prayer lists.
So here we can see that regardless of how Mr. Smith himself intended to use his “prayer circle,” Mark Batterson has interpreted it the same way the ancient Pagans and Gypsies have done. He sees the circle as not only a symbol to ask God for “revival,” but as a device for spiritual protection. The practice of circle-making and praying circles (or hedges) of protection are wildly unbiblical ideas and completely foreign to the context of Scripture. (For more on this, I would suggest Jim Osman’s book, Truth or Territory)
Sadly this witchcraft circle-making heresy has crept its way into orthodox evangelical circles (no pun intended) through the likes of men like Batterson and former Southern Baptist president, Ronnie Floyd. But another prominent figure who is promoting this junk is Nancy Leigh (DeMoss) Wolgemuth. A very popular women’s prayer event, CryOut, is led by DeMoss, and the event centers around this unbiblical form of pagan prayer. DeMoss, as well, attributes her practice of circle-making to Gipsy Smith, as she says,
Gipsy Smith was a nineteenth-century revivalist who did something unusual when he came to a new town. He’d stop on the outskirts and draw a circle in the dirt. Then he would stand inside that circle and say, “O God, please send a revival to this town, and let it begin inside this circle.”
It won’t do much good for me to ask God to convict the world around me of sin if there’s unconfessed sin in my own heart. The first step toward revival is to ask God to show us our sin and repent.
Would you ask God to revive His people? Would you let the Holy Spirit draw a circle within your own heart? Then say, “Lord, I long for You to send a revival to my nation, my church, my marriage, and my children. But Lord, would You first start a revival inside this circle? Let it begin in me.”
DeMoss also turns her listeners of her radio program to a known false teacher and promoter of pagan mysticism, Richard Foster. Foster is one of the founders of the Spiritual Formation movement, a movement whose central disciplines revolve around contemplative prayer and other forms of Eastern mysticism.
While she claims that her (unbiblical) practice is rooted in Christianity and is merely symbolic of the revival that we should pray for in our hearts, she is clearly misguided on what are acceptable forms of prayer and worship in the eyes of God. Has she forgotten in Exodus 32, when Aaron commanded the Israelites to remove the gold jewelry from their bodies and fashion a golden calf out of it? He proclaimed, “Tomorrow shall be a feast to the Lord.” (Exodus 32:5) Even though Aaron believed that he was doing this for the Lord, the Lord had clearly set guidelines for what he found acceptable as worship, and Aaron and the Israelites ignored. God’s wrath was against them.
Does Nancy Leigh DeMoss really believe that God is okay with her promoting and practicing spiritual paganism and calling it Christian? God has not given grounds or precedent to do this. Yet, she is opening up the doors of witchcraft and demonic influences to her followers by pushing this practice. Does she think she’s found a new way to pray for revival–a way that God didn’t already think of? Does she think that this Eastern mysticism-influenced form of prayer will be somehow more effective than the methods God has laid out for us in Scripture?
Be very careful of who you follow, whose books you read, and whose prayer conferences you attend. Test everything against Scripture to see if they are of God (1 Thessalonians 5:21). And please, do your research, so that you can’t be led astray (2 Tim 2:15).
take care that you be not ensnared to follow them, after they have been destroyed before you, and that you do not inquire about their gods, saying, ‘How did these nations serve their gods?—that I also may do the same.’ – Deuteronomy 12:30
See also:


Published on Sep 20, 2016
Former Head of the CIA and U.S. President George H.W. Bush is voting for Hillary Clinton, according to a member of another famous political family, the Kennedys.
InfoWars looks at the long relationship between the Bush and Clinton Crime Families and the False Left vs Right Paradigm.

G.H.W Bush Endorses Hillary
Published on Sep 20, 2016
George Herbert Walker Bush is going to vote for the despicable crooked Hillary Clinton in the coming election, further proving that there is no difference between the "left" and "right" wing.




Rahami followed known CIA asset

N.Y. Bomber Tied to CIA's al-Awlaki
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

Questions surround NY bomber Ahmad Khan Rahami’s manifesto praising known CIA-asset Anwar al-Awlaki as well as numerous visits to Afghanistan and Pakistan.
A manifesto found on Rahami made mention of the Boston Marathon Bombing, as well as Yemeni-American cleric Anwar al-Awlaki, who was reportedly killed by a US drone strike in Yemen.
al-Awlaki, a known CIA and FBI asset who dined at the Pentagon shortly after 9/11, directly inspired the Chattanooga shooter, the Ft. Hood shooter, the underwear bomber and the Charlie Hebdo terrorists.
“American-born cleric al-Awlaki’s role as a key figure in almost every recent terror plot targeting the United States and Canada, coupled with his visit to the Pentagon, only confirms our long stated position that al-Awlaki is a chief terrorist patsy-handler for the CIA – he is the federal government’s premier false flag agent,” wrote Paul Joseph Watson.
Rahami’s high school girlfriend, with whom he has a child, expressedsurprise over his involvement in the bombings, despite prior comments denouncing American culture and homosexuality.
“I never thought he would do something like this. I think he was brainwashed,” said the woman, identified only as Maria.
A U.S. official said Rahami made at least three months-long trips to Afghanistan and Pakistan since 2014. During one trip to Pakistan in 2011, Rahami reportedly visited Quetta, a hotbed of Taliban activity.
One of his friends noted that, upon returning from one of the trips, Rahami sported a beard and traditional Muslim robes; he reportedly began praying regularly in the back of his family’s fried chicken restaurant in Elizabeth, New Jersey.
“It’s like he was a completely different person,” said Flee Jones, a childhood friend of Rahami. “He got serious and completely closed off.”
Rahami met his wife in Pakistan, and procured a visa for her to come to the United States in 2012. Law enforcement officials are now looking to speak to the wife, who seemingly fled the United States to Pakistan, via the United Arab Emirates, just a few days before the attacks.

NY jihad bomber asked Congressmen for help to bring wife to US; wife left country days before jihad bombing

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

Maybe she is spending time with the Orlando jihad murderer’s wife. The father of the shooter should be questioned before he, too, vanishes. Meanwhile, the fact that the jihad bomber sought help from a Congressman to get his wife here is yet another illustration of how jihadis manipulate the system for their own advantage. The immigration system is in drastic need not just of reform, but of a total overhaul.
“Chelsea bombing suspect’s wife left US days before attack,” by Jamie Schram, Tina Moore and Yaron Steinbuch, New York Post, September 20, 2016:
The wife of the Afghan immigrant suspected in the New York and New Jersey bombings left the US for Pakistan just a few days before the attacks, according to reports.
The woman, who has not been named, has been intercepted by authorities in the United Arab Emirates, the Los Angeles Times reported.
Officials are working with authorities in Pakistan and the United Arab Emirates to question her about what she knew about her husband’s plans, a law enforcement source told CNN.
Ahmad Khan Rahami, a naturalized US citizen, made at least three months-long trips to Pakistan and Afghanistan since 2014, officials said.
He stayed in Pakistan for a year between April 2013 and March 2014, spending time in a Taliban stronghold, CNN reported.
Rahami has clammed up and is refusing to cooperate with authorities, a source told The Post.
“We are looking into who may have helped him in training, with money” and with other means, the source said. “His family is being looked at, too.”
FBI Assistant Director William Sweeney said there was “no indication” of an active terror cell in the New York area — but evidence suggests Rahami was not acting alone, sources told CNN….
O’Neill said the bombing had all the hallmarks of “an act of terror.”…
Rep. Albio Sires (D-NJ) said Monday that Rahami contacted his office from Pakistan in 2014 seeking help because his pregnant wife had an expired Pakistani passport.
“He wanted his wife to come from Pakistan,” Sires told MSNBC. “At the time she was pregnant and in Pakistan. They told her that she could not come over until she had the baby, because she had to get a visa for the baby.”…
Ahmad Khan Rahami's Own Father Knew He Was A Terrorist. Why didn’t the FBI?
Published on Sep 20, 2016
Father of suspected New York City bomber Ahmad Khan Rahami had reported his son to the FBI after several incidents of violence, the FBI came back and of course told him that his son was not a threat.

Father of NYC jihad bomber called FBI on his son in 2014; Marine says father was jihadi in Afghanistan

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
Ahmad Khan Rahami lived with his father. His father never noticed the pressure cookers, the bomb parts — none of it? He should be closely questioned.
“‘I called the FBI 2 years ago!’: Chelsea bombing suspect’s dad,” by Kevin Sheehan and Yaron Steinbuch, New York Post, September 20, 2016:
…After closing his New Jersey fried chicken restaurant, Mohammad Rahami was asked by reporters whether he had called the feds on his son.
“Yes, I called the FBI,” he said as he drove off in his Chevy Suburban after speaking with FBI agents in Elizabeth, where he lives above his First American Fried Chicken joint.
He also said he didn’t think his son is a terrorist. Asked why, he said: “Because the FBI — they know that.”
The cryptic response followed one he made earlier, when he yelled, “I called the FBI two years ago!”…
A day earlier, the elder Rahami said he had “no idea” about his son’s alleged bomb plots in New York and New Jersey.
“My heart is very, very…,” he said before trailing off.
Asked if he been aware of what his son was up to, he told NBC News: “No idea.”…
A neighbor and former Marine who served in Afghanistan told the Israeli newspaper Haaretz that “the father used to be a mujahedeen in Afghanistan.”
“He is from the same city where I was deployed as a Marine,” Jonathan Wagner told Haaretz, adding that the father used to say the Taliban were ruining Afghanistan.
An agent has confirmed that Mohammad Rahami really did call the feds, but then retracted his claims about his son: “Ahmad Rahami’s dad accused son of being a terrorist in 2014,” by Kevin Johnson, USA Today, September 20, 2016:
New York bombing suspect Ahmad Rahami surfaced on the FBI’s radar about two years ago when Rahami’s father allegedly referred to his son as a terrorist, a federal law enforcement official told USA TODAY on Tuesday.
The reference came during a domestic dispute involving the family, prompting the FBI to review the father’s claims, according to the official who was not authorized to comment publicly.
The official said the matter was closed in part because the father recanted his claim, and there was nothing to substantiate it.

East Coast Bomber’s Father Warned Police About His Son in 2014

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
In 2014, the East Coast bomber’s father told FBI agents that his son was a terrorist. The father, Mohammad Rahami, told the New York Times:
Two years ago I go to the FBI because my son [Ahmad Khan Rahami, shown] was doing really bad, O.K.? But they check almost two months [and] they say: “He’s O.K., he’s clean, he’s not a terrorist.”
I say O.K.
It’s not OK. The father did the right thing: acting as the first line of defense against a radical jihadists who threatened innocents. The FBI investigation, called an “assessment,” failed to turn up enough evidence to so much as put Ahmad on a watch list.
Yet after the bombings, evidence turned up that previously should have triggered more than a cursory “nothing to see here, move along” from the police or the FBI. To wit: The terrorist made several trips abroad between 2010 and 2014, including a year’s stay in Pakistan. His notebook, recovered at the scene of his arrest, following the attack in New York, revealed a follower of Anwar al-Awlaki (al-Qaeda’s leading propagandist, who was killed five years ago in Yemen) and a supporter of Nidal Hassan, the murderer of soldiers at Fort Hood.
In addition Ahmad spent three months in jail for attacking and knifing his brother. Didn’t that register on the assessment screen?
Apparently not. That “assessment” didn’t even involve a conversation with the accused bomber. Two months: no evidence, no concerns, no conversation?
An official, when asked about the inquiry, said the father made the comment out of anger at his son and later recanted.
Mr. Rahami was charged with aggravated assault and illegal weapons possession, according to court records. He spent over three months in jail, according to a law enforcement official with knowledge of the investigation. A grand jury, however, declined to indict Mr. Rahami. Assistant director William F. Sweeney, who heads the F.B.I.’s New York office, alluded on Monday at a news conference to a “domestic incident” in which he said the “allegations were recanted.”
If lone-wolf jihadists are to be stopped, or even slowed, at least two things must happen: Non-jihadist Muslims must not remain silent when terrorists exist in their midst, plotting, planning, and carrying out their acts of terror. If they don’t, then every Muslim in the country will be painted with the same brush: You’re all terrorists!
And investigations such as the “assessment” that revealed nothing must go deeper and reach further in order to identify those who would harm U.S. citizens. Without at least these two changes, more lone-wolf attacks by disaffected Muslim terrorists posing as Americans can be expected to maim and kill innocents.  


Obama Brags About His Globalist Legacy 
At Final UN Speech
Published on Sep 20, 2016
The United Nations General Assembly in New York City spent the day painting a rosy picture around the autocratic nightmare known as Agenda 2030. Then President Obama stepped up to the podium for his final love fest of himself as the President of the United States. As if speaking into the vacuum of space, Obama lectured the international body of globalist banking pawns with half truths and grandiose ideas. Still promising big things after eight years of diligently checking off the multinational corporation’s to do list at the expense of any real hope or change benefiting the citizens of the United States.

Meanwhile, just outside the doors of the United Nations building in Manhattan. The true impact of Obama’s policies basked in stark reality. As the number of black food-stamp recipients rose 58.2% under Obama. A stagnant GDP growth of 2.4% in 2015 froze the economy. And a national debt ticked away incessantly as it essentially doubled under Obama’s spending spree on global initiatives and the prerogatives of other nations.

As our national security is threatened by Obama’s Immigration Trojan Horse, the hesitation to consistently deny the existence of radical terrorism is a clear and present danger. Billionaire Obama and Hillary supporter George Soros added insult to injury by announcing a donation of $500 million to keep the destabilization of civilization on an even keel. CNBC reported "We will invest in startups, established companies, social impact initiatives, and businesses started by migrants and refugees." the 86-year-old George Soros said in an official statement.

Todays hollow talk in the United Nations building was nothing short of a desperate attempt to push an Agenda 2030 narrative with more empty promises masking a New World Order stratagem waging a soft war on the very sovereignty of nations.

SEE: below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
President Obama said that nations will have to give up some of their autonomy and freedom to achieve security on Tuesday during his speech to the United Nations General Assembly.
Obama told the audience that he believes global security can be achieved with the help of international institutions like the U.N. In his remarks, Obama said “powerful nations” like the United States will have to accept constraints and give up some of their freedom. The president acknowledged that he has been criticized by his own citizens for this belief, but that he remains convinced he is right. Obama also stated that, while countries will have to accept some limits on their freedom, they should not give up the right to defend themselves.
“We can only realize the promise of this institution’s founding to replace the ravages of war with cooperation if powerful nations like my own accept constraints,” Obama said. “I’m convinced in the long run giving up some freedom of action, not giving up our ability to protect ourselves or pursue our core interests but binding ourselves to international rules, over the long-term, enhances our security.”
Full remark:
"We have to put our money where our mouths are. And we can only realize the promise of this institution’s founding to replace the ravages of war with cooperation if powerful nations like my own accept constraints. Sometimes I’m criticized in my own country for professing a belief in international norms and multilateral institutions, but I’m convinced in the long run giving up some freedom of action, not giving up our ability to protect ourselves or pursue our core interests but binding ourselves to international rules, over the long-term, enhances our security."
Barack Obama's final address at the UN general assembly
Published on Sep 20, 2016
Today is the 2nd day of the UN summit on Migration where speakers from different countries will address issues of security, economy and education. The highlight is US President Barack Obama's final address to the annual gathering of world leaders in New York. This is his eighth and final speech as President.

Busted: Obama Bashes America 11 Times Before the United Nations
Published on Sep 21, 2016
A private detective has released video footage of a younger Barak Obama admitting his distain for "whites." Obama rebukes “extremism” in his United Nations speech; his last as POTUS. He goes on to criticize America 11 times before the United Nations, laying out his own foreign policy “legacy.” He makes no mention of the 29 New York City victims at the hands of Ahmed Kahn Rahami, and declares the world “safer today.” Lee Ann McAdoo and Margaret Howell discuss the mass immigration push, as Obama leaves office.


SEE: below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

The Obama administration continues to devote taxpayer dollars to register new immigrant voters (i.e., Democratic voters) in time for the November election. After spending $19 million early this year on the registration efforts, the administration has dedicated another $10 million this month. 
Judicial Watch reports, “The money is distributed by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), the Homeland Security Agency that oversees lawful immigration, to organizations that help enhance pathways to naturalization by offering immigrants free citizenship instruction, English, US. History and civics courses.”
The agency has spent a significant amount of money on these grants, $63 million since 2009, to prepare over 150,000 immigrants for citizenship, according to Judicial Watch.
“We intend to award about $1 million to first-time recipients in the Citizenship and Integration Grant Program for fiscal year 2016,” the USCIS grant announcement states. “If you represent one of these organizations, or know of an interested organization, we strongly encourage that organization to consider applying. Additionally, another $9 million will fund programs that provide both citizenship instruction and instruction and naturalization application services.”
The Department of Homeland Security has also recruited other groups to help provide the necessary services for immigrants to gain citizenship status. "USCIS acknowledges the valuable role that local service provider community-based organizations play in immigrant communities," the announcement reads. "Due to the strong relationships these agencies often have with immigrants in the local area, these organizations can assist USCIS in its effort to reach underserved populations." 
These efforts fall under a larger initiative launched by the Obama administration last year with the creation of the Task Force on New Americans, chaired by his domestic policy director, Cecilia Muñoz, the former vice president of the notoriously anti-American group National Council of La Raza (NCLR), which has cost millions of taxpayer dollars.
Likewise, numerous federal agencies have joined the effort, including the Departments of Labor, Education, Justice, Housing and Urban Development and Health and Human Services. Each Department's contribution involves further use of taxpayer dollars and funds things such as workforce programs, education toolkits, and access to housing programs, all of which are subsidized by taxpayers. 
Judicial Watch contends that the program is clearly intended to qualify “as many immigrants as possible to vote since they tend to cast ballots for Democrats.” The $10 million grant is targeting more than a dozen states, including Ohio and Florida, both of which are key swing states that can make a big difference in November.
In 2012, a Cooperative Congressional Election Study found that among 2,900 naturalized immigrants, 62.5 percent identified as Democrats, 12.9 percent as independent, and 24.6 percent as Republican. Among non-citizens, those figures are even worse for Republicans, with just 16.8 percent identifying as Republican, 60.4 percent as Democrat and 22.9 percent as independent.
Likewise, a 2014 report from the Center for Immigration Studies revealed that increased immigration amounts to a growing Democratic voter base. "The enormous flow of legal immigrants into the country — 29.5 million from 1980 to 2012 — has remade and continues to remake the nation's electorate in favor of the Democratic Party," concluded the report. "As the immigrant population has grown, Republican electoral prospects have dimmed, even after controlling for alternative explanations of GOP performance."
Sadly, the Republican-led Congress is an all-too willing participant, as it approved the money for the USCIS grant, notes WND.
Robert Spencer, author of the blog, contends that the Democratic Party has been buying votes for years with taxpayer dollars
“Ever since 1932, the Democratic Party has been buying constituencies and securing their status as the majority party by offering benefits — welfare, etc. — to the constituent groups,” Spencer said. “Their push for unrestricted immigration and amnesty for illegals is no different. It’s just another scam to get more Democrat voters into the polling booths.”
Meanwhile, at the same time the Obama administration is pouring taxpayer dollars into recruiting new Democratic voters, it is simultaneously fighting state voter ID laws that seek to prevent voter fraud. In other words, even when the administration cannot turn enough immigrants into legal voters, the absence of voter ID laws can ensure that illegal immigrants can cast their ballots in November.
Despite claims by the Left that voter fraud is non-existent, a 2014 study confirmed that close races are influenced by non-citizens who cast ballots. That study found that in 2008, for example, non-citizens likely won Barack Obama the state of North Carolina. 
It seems like this administration has all its bases covered so that it can push for four more years of the same policies under a new Democratic leader.  
Soros Invests $500 Million For Refugee Crisis He Helped Create
Published on Sep 21, 2016
Problem-Reaction-Solution. And of course the billionaire-investor is set to make big money off his latest venture which will fundamentally reshape the communities hosting refugees.