Friday, June 22, 2018


SEE: below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:

USA – -( Few politicians in this country seem to be as hell-bent on stripping away the rights of gun owners as the Governor of New York, Andrew Cuomo is.
Hardly a week goes by without a new proposal or law being conceived by his office or someone close to him that further proves that gun owners in that state are viewed at as the enemy and that the Second Amendment in his mind is outdated and needs a serious overhaul. Even in an election year, when most politicians are wary of proposing legislation that could be seen as anti-gun, Cuomo has taken more of a “Damn the torpedoes! Full speed ahead!” attitude as he sees himself as invincible and incapable of losing. It’s also quite apparent to many that the son of progressive Mario Cuomo has desires that take him to the White House and his name is among many as a Democrat Party contender for 2020.
Andrew Cuomo is no rookie in his desire to pass gun control. As the HUD Secretary under Bill Clinton, Cuomo made several speeches where his willingness to pass legislation came directly to the forefront. In a Press Conference he made on February 16, 2000, for the very anti-gun Congresswoman Carolyn McCarthy, Cuomo put it very plainly
“Pass the gun control laws, put the safety devices on guns that will reduce the number of tragedies.”
Later that same year, on June 20, Cuomo gave a speech to Handgun Control, Inc. on not only gun owners and gun control, but it showed his hatred even then for both as well as the NRA. Cuomo stated when discussing how to pass gun legislation and convince gun owners on new laws
“But we can have a safer gun. We can keep guns away from children. We can keep guns away from criminals. We can have a safer distribution network. And the sun will still rise in the morning for the bona fide sportsman and the bona fide hunters.”
Fast forward to 2007 when Andrew Cuomo became Attorney General to the State of New York, and there were many who speculated even then of his political aspirations. Soon enough it was announced he was running for Governor, but he toned down his anti-gun rhetoric, to the point that many gun owners in the state were convinced he had no interest in passing future legislation. That Trojan horse had been tried and used successfully in New York by Kirsten Gillibrand who was elected to Congress with an A+ rating from the NRA but quickly turned on gun owners once she was sworn in. Cuomo though had a proven anti-gun track record but still was voted in and became Governor on January 1, 2011.
Since he was sworn in, Andrew Cuomo has targeted gun owners with a particular venom that few other states have ever seen. Following the school shooting in Newtown, Cuomo rushed to pass the strictest gun laws in the country, leading the charge with his infamous “You don’t need ten bullets to kill a deer speech.” In the dead of night, and sadly with the help of some Republicans, New York passed what became known as The Safe Act, which has grown into a convoluted mess of gun laws that instantly made millions of gun owners criminals overnight.
Cuomo quickly made his thoughts known about gun owners and their rights when he mentioned that if possible, he would have no qualms about taking their guns made illegal by the Safe Act. He stated in a radio interview that 
“Confiscation could be an option. Mandatory sale to the state could be an option.”
In the end, gun owners who owned what was once deemed acceptable had to register them with the state, yet many refused, the compliance rate to this day is no more than thirty percent. Magazines over ten rounds were outlawed and had to be turned in or sold to states where they were legal. If you got caught with one, jail time was certain. Gun owners can no longer order ammunition to be delivered to their home, and the last proposal, the background check on all ammunition purchases has languished as the system has never been able to be successfully implemented, and as of now remains quietly on hold.
Since the Safe Act, there has been a steady stream of gun laws proposed, and the small minority of Republicans holding the line in the state Senate have been stopping most of them from becoming law. Some have made it through, and when they don’t, Cuomo vents his anger at conservatives.
In January 2014 Cuomo slammed conservative New Yorkers who he saw as a threat to his agenda, and his views of how New York should be governed. He stated that conservatives who don’t tow the line needed to or else.
“Who are they? Right to life, pro-assault weapons, anti-gay — if that’s who they are, they have no place in the state of New York because that’s not who New Yorkers are.”
With Andrew Cuomo, it’s his way or the highway, and he would like instead you leave HIS state then speak out and oppose what he wants for it, and that vision is gun owners with no rights whatsoever.
Lately, the Governor has been taking his frustrations out on the NRA and gun owners again ever since the Parkland shooting. Since then he has advocated raising the minimum age to buy a gun to 21, he is opposed to arming not only teachers but putting armed law enforcement officers in schools even though he and the rest of the legislators in Albany enjoy the protection of armed guards. Several county sheriffs who have defied Cuomo in the past over their disapproval of the Safe Act are now working with school boards to put cops in schools even though no funding will ever be forthcoming from the state of New York for it.
Andrew Cuomo at Everytowns March for Gun Control
Andrew Cuomo at Everytowns March for Gun Control
Recently, Andrew Cuomo introduced one of the most Draconian gun control proposals ever conceived, another “first” for the nation, remove the guns from the home of troubled students, even if the parents are law-abiding and have done absolutely nothing wrong. That’s right; the new law would give teachers and school administrators the legal standing to petition a court to have the guns confiscated from a home if the kid showed signs of being a danger to themselves or others, with not even an arrest or conviction of the parent or legal guardian.
Cuomo stated that this new law would be a sensible alternative to arming teachers or placing law enforcement officers in schools.

One might ask why gun owners and New Yorkers have not voted out the man who has fast become known as “King Andy”?

It’s not that simple, despite that fact that in the last Gubernatorial election Cuomo won fourteen out of the state’s sixty-two counties and that outside of New York City, the challenger Rob Astorino won the election by 1% of the vote. New York state has long been run NOT by Albany which is the supposed capital, but by the ever rotten and wildly liberal mecca just across the river from New Jersey. Forty percent of the state lives in New York City, and they have been voting Democrat for decades, despite the continuing decline of both that metropolis and the state as a whole.

This election needs to be different. Not just for gun owners in the state of New York, who are only a couple of state Senate seats away from seeing their rights stripped and pilfered by politicians who legitimately hate them.

Gun owners in New York are treated as hicks and rubes who are responsible for all of the crime that takes place statewide and the NRA as an extremist group, being recently called that by Andrew Cuomo himself, who has apparent ambitions for the 2020 Presidential election. Imagine a Congress controlled by the Democrats with a man like Andrew Cuomo at the helm. Gun rights would become a thing of the past, even if the laws pushed through were illegal or unconstitutional, it would take years before they got to the Supreme Court to be challenged.
Marc Molinaro
Marc Molinaro
Gun owners and all New Yorkers MUST get involved; they MUST get out and vote in November and show that they are tired of being treated like subjects and not citizens. Cuomo’s opponent, Marc Molinaro has voiced his support for gun owners, and they must get behind him if they want to keep the rights they have, and in the end, they can win if they get mobilized. If not, then they have no one but themselves to blame, but by defeating King Andy now, it will also send a message that if he can’t keep his own state, he has no chance to win the White House. In the end, though, New York State, one of the birthplaces of freedom and liberty during the American Revolution may have this very last chance to save some of it for the people who live there.

David LaPell
David LaPell
About David LaPell
David LaPell has been a Corrections Officer with the local Sheriff's Department for thirteen years. A collector of antique and vintage firearms for over twenty years and an avid hunter. David has been writing articles about firearms, hunting and western history for ten years. In addition to having a passion for vintage guns, he is also a fan of old trucks and has written articles on those as well.


School Video Quote:
May God help us all to find the true faith, Islam.”
SEE: below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Imagine the outcry if a public school district were teaching that “Christianity is the true faith.” But this kind of thing is going on all over the country, and no one particularly minds. The parents are dismissed as “far-right,” and everything goes on as usual.
“Judge green-lights parent’s lawsuit against public school teaching ‘Islam is the true faith,’” Leo Hohmann, June 20, 2018:
A federal judge has refused to toss out a lawsuit brought by a parent against the Chatham, New Jersey, school district, which showed seventh-graders a pro-Muslim video that included an invitation to convert to the “true faith.”
In denying the school district’s motion to dismiss the case, U.S. District Court Judge Kevin McNulty said the motion was worth only “minimal discussion.”
Kate Oliveri, an attorney with Thomas More Law Center, is representing Libby Hilsenrath, whose 12-year-old son attends Chatham Middle School. Oliveri said the decision to let the lawsuit proceed came as no surprise.
“The motion to dismiss was a further attempt by the school district to bully and silence Mrs. Hilsenrath,” she said. “The school district ignored the legal standard and ignored the facts, attempting instead to fool the judge with a poor attempt at sophistry.”
The lawsuit claims that seventh-grade students at the Chatham Middle School were forced to watch a set of videos in their World Cultures and Geography class that sought to convert them to Islam. Here is a sampling of what the students learned by watching just one of the 5-minute videos:
  • God gave Muhammed the noble Quran
  • The Quran is a Perfect guide for Humanity
  • The Quran is divine revelation
  • Islam is a shining beacon against the darkness of repression, segregation, intolerance and racism​
  • The Beautiful Quran is Guidance for the wise & sensible.
Then came the topper. The video ends with this: “May God help us all to find the true faith, Islam.”
A musical version of an Arabic poem plays in the background throughout the video. The lyrics describe Christians and Jews as infidels and praises Muhammed for slaughtering them: . . . “their white shining swords red with the blood of infidels
. . . until they looked like meat on the butcher’s block.”…


QUOTES: "Vargas came out as gay during his senior year of high school in 1999, a decision he later described as "less daunting than coming out about my legal status". He spoke out against the Defense of Marriage Act, calling it an immigration issue that disadvantages people similar to him from "marry[ing] my way into citizenship like straight people can".
In 2015, Vargas was named one of Out Magazine's "Out100", which celebrates 100 compelling people who have had a hand in moving forward LGBTQ rights. 
In 2016, Vargas received the José Esteban Muñoz award from CLAGS: The Center for LGBTQ Studies which is an award given to an individual who for promotes Queer Studies in their work or activism."
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
In yet another move serving to diminish our sense of nationhood, a school in California will be named after an illegal alien.
The school, in Mountain View, will bear the name of one Jose Antonio Vargas. Vargas came to the United States in 1993 at age 12 and has committed numerous felonies (using fraudulent documents), including claiming on I-9 forms to be an American citizen so that he could get various jobs, such as with the Washington Post.
CNN reports on the story, “‘I don't really have words for how meaningful this honor is, I've been speechless for a few days,’ Vargas, 37, told CNN.” As you’ll see, this is another fib — one thing Vargas never is, is speechless.
Vargas continued, relates CNN, “I hope that this is a school where students and their families feel welcome in America, no matter where they come from.” Note that he didn’t say “No matter where they’re from legally.”
CNN then informed:
The goal is for the school near San Jose to open for grades K-5 in 2019, according to Mountain View Whisman School District documents.
The school board approved the naming last week after Vargas was one of five people whose names were suggested for the new school by members of the community.
As a product of the district's schools, Vargas said he was overwhelmed by “this totally unexpected and deeply meaningful honor.”
“I think every undocumented immigrant [sic] in this country wherever you are ... from the big regions to the small towns, we’re defined by our communities. I grew up in that community. This feels so special,” he said.
While the award was an honor to him, some have taken to social media to express their anger that “an illegal immigrant’s [sic]” name is on a school. One person posting on the Twitter account of Vargas’ organization referred to him as “a cheat and a liar.”
Of course, this is a simple statement of fact, as the Center for Immigration Studies demonstrated in 2013 by providing a list of Vargas’ many crimes. Here’s part of it:
• Vargas’ grandfather and Vargas violated Social Security laws by obtaining a Social Security card with fake documents.
• Vargas’ grandfather and Vargas knowingly altered a Social Security card and Vargas illegally used the doctored Social Security card to obtain employment and other benefits.
• Vargas committed perjury and illegally claimed to be an American citizen on I-9 forms in order to get jobs with employers such as Subway, the Y.M.C.A., the Washington Post, the San Francisco Chronicle, and the Huffington Post.
• Vargas created a network of family members, educators, news people, and wealthy business leaders who helped him carry out and cover up his felonies in order to remain and work in the United States.
• Vargas and his accomplices in crime fabricated residency information in order to fraudulently obtain an Oregon driver’s license.
• Vargas even used a Social Security number obtained with false documents to gain entrance to the White House.
Vargas would no doubt justify this, as he told CNN, “So basically, like the 11 million immigrants in this country, I am in limbo land.” Of course, he could easily emigrate from limbo land by returning to his native country.
Then there’s his language manipulation. CNN again: “‘It's inhumane for news organizations to call these [illegal] kids and their parents illegal,’ he said.  Branding people ‘illegal,’ he says, makes them seem less than human.” Yet as American Thinker noted, “First, Vargas is not an ‘immigrant.’ That is a legal definition of someone who comes to the U.S. legally.” 
“And calling an illegal alien ‘illegal’ does not make him ‘less human.’ It makes him ... well, illegal,” the site continued. “That these definitions have been obscured by rank emotionalism is reprehensible and immoral.”
No doubt. Vargas’ preferred term, “undocumented immigrant,” is a euphemism meant to legitimize a certain kind of criminality. It’s much like calling a rapist an undocumented husband. Note here that all criminals — from embezzlers to bank robbers to child molesters — are human. This doesn’t mean we don’t sometimes describe them in harsh terms so as to stigmatize their actions.
But along with our terminology, many things have been turned on their head. In a saner time, discovering that a person obtained jobs under false pretenses would discredit him. Yet Vargas — who lied to get the aforementioned newspaper positions — gets the red-carpet treatment from the media. It helps, of course, that he enjoys the affirmative-action-age trifecta of being non-white, illegal, and homosexual. We should remember, however, that we get more of what we reward. Applaud and enrich scam artists, and scam artists will multiply.
Given his history, it’s no surprise that Vargas is still peddling untruths, now in the migration debate. Below is a video of how he tweeted a picture of a “kid in a cage” and claimed that the government put him there, when it was actually pro-illegal-migration activists who did.
Since Vargas was brought here as a child, it would be easy to have some sympathy for him if he’d simply say, “Look, I was sent here as a kid and did what was necessary to survive, but I understand that illegal migration must be stopped.” Yet as his 2017 interview (video below) with Fox News’ Tucker Carlson demonstrates, he has a very supercilious, entitled attitude and is working to undermine our country’s laws.
Vargas essentially blames America for illegal migration, implying that we must tolerate it because of our past sins. Well, not just slavery but also human sacrifice were once common in his native Philippines, but no one says that the nation must atone by allowing its demographic destruction. Strangely, that penance is reserved exclusively for Western lands.


SEE: below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Antifa, the leftist group known for Brownshirt tactics, is at it again. It just tweeted out a list of 1,595 Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents’ identities — information passed to it by a New York University college professor. As the Daily Caller reports:
The Twitter account “nebraska antifa” sent out a tweet to its followers on Tuesday that linked to the personal information of ICE officers compiled from information found on LinkedIn.
“Some enterprising hero archived the ICE employees listed on linkedin,” the tweet reads.
A Twitter user who goes by Sam Lavigne compiled the list of ICE agents’ identities, titles and locations. In a tweet on Tuesday morning he says he “scraped LinkedIn for people that work for ICE.”
The Medium link in Lavigne’s was no longer available as of Tuesday night.
While the original post of ICE personal information has been removed, the Antifa Twitter account linked to an archived post, where viewers can access the Lavigne’s original database.
Lavigne created the database in response to ICE’s “inhumane” efforts in on the border, according to his archived Medium post.
“I’ve downloaded and made available the profiles of (almost) everyone on LinkedIn who works for ICE, 1,595 people in total. While I don’t have a precise idea of what should be done with this data set, I leave it here with the hope that researchers, journalists, and activists will find it useful,” Lavigne wrote on Medium.
Of course, what Lavigne really hopes is that this sharing of private information — a favored leftist tactic known as “doxxing” — will lead to harassment of, and maybe even violence against, the ICE agents. This accords with Rule 12 in Saul “the Red” Alinsky’s book Rules for Radicals: “Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions.” The book, which is dedicated to Lucifer (seriously), is considered a bible of leftist activism.
This story gets even more interesting because it turns out that the data-diving Twitter user doesn’t just go by the name Sam Lavigne. Lavigne, a far-left artist and game designer, is actually “an adjunct professor at New York University’s Tisch School of the Arts,” the Caller reported in a later article.
That the culprit here is an academic won’t surprise anyone acquainted with higher (mis)education. Democrat professors outnumber Republican ones on college campuses approximately 10 to 1, and one study found that almost 40 percent of examined liberal-arts colleges had no Republicans whatsoever.
And the left of this academic Left have truly left sanity. Consider Ward Churchill, the disgraced ex-University of Colorado ethnic-studies professor fired in 2007 after likening 9/11 victims to Nazis (he called them “little Eichmanns), and former University of Missouri professor Melissa Click, fired in 2016 after committing third-degree assault (video below). Ideologically, they’re not all that rare in academia, which has long been a leftist-indoctrination intellectual death trap.
Yet the violent spirit reflected in Click and Antifa — which has even been condemned by the liberal Anti- Defamation League — has always characterized what we call the “Left.” The Left murdered thousands in the “Reign of Terror” after its birth during the French Revolution period. Joseph Stalin and his Soviets killed at least 20 million people, China’s Mao Tse-tung approximately 60 million, and Pol Pot’s Khmer Rouge wiped out one-quarter to one-third of Cambodia’s population in just four years (’75-’79). All told, Marxist regimes exterminated approximately 100 million people during the 20th century, which likely makes them history’s most prolific mass murderers.
None of this is surprising. The Left has always opposed Christianity and the concept of Moral Truth itself and embraced a moral relativism/nihilism epitomized by Fyodor Dostoevsky’s observation, “Without God, all things are permitted.” Note here that famed French philosopher and part-time Maoist Jean-Paul Sartre endorsed this idea, calling it his existentialism’s “starting point.” Also note that the vile and vicious Khmer Rouge are said to have been influenced by his philosophy.
And so it is today. Whether it’s Antifa, Black Lives Matter, BAMN (By Any Means Necessary), or some other leftist group, the credo is violence over veritas. (Interview with BAMN organizer Yvette Felarca below — it’s a must-see.)
By the way, Antifa-ally Felarca is, like Lavigne, an “educator.” And while she advocates violence and is currently facing charges of felonious assault, she’s still employed molding young minds at her Berkeley, California, middle school.


SEE: below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Once again President Trump has made waves — by telling the truth — in just the way a regular guy would. After defending our now somewhat saner migration policies in a Tuesday speech, he sent a Wednesday morning tweet stating, “Democrats are the problem. They don’t care about crime and want illegal immigrants, no matter how bad they may be, to pour into and infest our Country, like MS-13. They can’t win on their terrible policies, so they view them as potential voters!”
Unsurprisingly, leftists complained about this description, with CNN writing that “Trump used language evoking images of pests, not human beings, when describing migrants approaching the US border.” This is reminiscent of the MS-13 controversy, in which liberals bristled when the president characterized the gang’s violent members as “animals”; the idea was that Trump was denying the dignity of the human person.
One of those condemning him was CNN commentator Ana Navarro, who herself had characterized Trump as an animal just two years ago; she furthermore said he “should drop out of the human race.” Of course, this pales in comparison to Democrats’ regular use of “fightin’ words,” where they continually call opponents “racists,” “sexists,” “bigots,” “homophobes,” “fascists,” and one particularly popular at the moment, “Nazis.” Yet now they exhibit a situational sense of civility (subject to change without notice).
All this virtue-signaling and faux outrage can, however, obscure a simple but significant truth contained in Trump’s tweet. As I wrote last year in “DACA: Demanding Amnesty for Cultural Annihilation”:
People warn of the fiscal consequences of absorbing poor migrants; libertarians say the solution is nixing the welfare state. People complain about “pressing one” for English and say we must insist newcomers learn English. Then there’s illegal-alien crime, which requires a strict law-and-order approach. The problem? Importing waves of socialists and giving them the vote ensures none of these solutions will ever happen.
Since 1965, 85 percent of our immigrants have hailed from the Third World; 70 to 90 percent of them vote for leftist Democrats upon naturalization. The demographic/cultural/electoral changes, these causes are a major reason California, once a Reagan red state, is now devolving into a one-party, Democrat dystopia. And it’s a reason why the whole country is following suit.
This, not “compassion,” is why statists are immigrationists: They’re importing voters and using aliens to make Americanism alien to America. The result? As statism-oriented newcomers help empower thinly veiled socialists, fiscal irresponsibility, the welfare state, soft-on-crime approaches, our culture’s destruction (e.g., the statue wars), and the rest of the leftist program increasingly become the norm. Demographics is destiny — especially when voting is ensured.
This principle, “If the people won’t change the government, change the people,” is the long-term motivation behind the current “separating children from their parents”/child-abuse narrative; the short-term goal is to buttress Democrats’ flagging poll numbers and find a winning issue for the November midterms.
But the issue is a lie. Ten-thousand of the 12,000 illegal-alien children in custody came here without their parents, who chose to separate themselves from their kids to game our system; they know that our law prevents us from deporting unaccompanied minors arriving from non-contiguous countries. And back when the media could be slightly more honest about this issue (when Barack Obama reigned), MSNBC reported on this phenomenon.
In fact, Obama spoke of the aforementioned during his presidency, with the below 2014 interview being an example:
But now Trump-derangement Syndrome carries the day. For simply enforcing laws on the books, the administration has been accused of “child abuse,” and of being “Nazis” for placing kids in what propagandists call “child internment camps.” Ex-CIA chief Michael Hayden sang this devilish tune, tweeting a photo of Auschwitz on Saturday, prompting Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz to say that the Nazi comparison was a form of “holocaust denial.”  
In reality, the child detention centers are more like boarding schools. Even left-wing CNN reported last week, after touring such a facility, that the kids were enjoying recreation such as watching soccer on TV and engaging in tai chi, pool, and foosball, and that their rooms were “antiseptically clean” (a quality not common in their native countries). Yeah, that’s just what was happening at Dachau.
But Trump-derangement Syndrome has caused the Left to go off the rails. Driven by the notion that “the enemy of my enemy is my friend,” its minions have defended MS-13 and spoken glowingly of accomplishments in the porn industry (relating to Stormy Daniels). But most comically, Hillary Clinton, a pooh-bah of prenatal infanticide posing as a latter-day St. Thomas Aquinas, cited the Bible to justify Democrat voter-importation efforts, saying “Jesus said suffer the little children unto me. He did not say let the children suffer.” (Below is a good video on her migration hypocrisy.)
All this posturing, mind you, comes from people who don’t bat an eye over American children separated permanently from their parents after being killed by illegals or kids separated permanently from this world via intrauterine murder.
This, not to mention that whenever American citizens commit serious crimes — tax evasion, embezzlement, theft, etc. — and are imprisoned, they’re separated from their children. Should we just stop enforcing the law?
Actually, leftists just want situational lawlessness, with law enforcement suspended only in a certain area — the one that will get them more future voters.


The left hates families and children, why should we believe them now?

Don’t bullsh*t me; The left doesn’t “care about the children”.
All they care about is using kids as political tools to obtain raw power.
All they care about is manipulating people into supporting open border madness