GLOBALISTS WILL ENSLAVE US~RADICAL ISLAM WILL KILL US

QUOTED VERBATIM FROM ARTICLE BELOW:

"We further encourage each and every reader to forward this article to everyone on his or her list, well BEFORE THE ELECTION. Time is of the essence. We know that Trump is not a perfect presidential candidate by any stretch, 

but Hillary Clinton will fundamentally destroy America with malice aforethought and with a crooked smile on her face and disdain in her heart. America will be conquered by globalism under a Clinton Monarchy. And as we all know, Bill and Hillary will profit handsomely from the destruction of America's sovereignty and freedom."

GLOBALISTS WILL ENSLAVE US~

RADICAL ISLAM WILL KILL US

SEE: http://newswithviews.com/Ewart/ron272.htm; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

By Ron Ewart
October 19, 2016
NewsWithViews.com

In our last article entitled, "Did Hillary Sacrifice the Benghazi Heroes for Money?" we wrote this:

"That the mainstream news media purposely ignores these associations and questionable past can only be construed as being complicit in a conspiracy with Hillary Clinton, or her handlers, in what appears to be a potential plot to take over America from the inside and hand it over to the world ruling class and the bankers."

The ruling class (all politicians), mega corporations and central bankers are the globalists. Hillary is a globalist and does not care one whit about national sovereignty, or American exceptionalism, much less the U. S. Constitution. She and Bill only care about power and money and increasing that power and money by any means. Laws are only a minor inconvenience to them that can be overcome by buying off the government, law enforcement and the media, each co conspirators in the Clinton's crooked game. Government is for sale to the highest bidder for Bill and Hillary. But then, government has always been for sale to the highest bidder since government was invented over 5,000 years ago. The only thing that keeps government from becoming corrupt and succumbing to the highest bidder is the people. But history has shown that most people don't care, so they get corrupt government by their own in-action.

But it is even worse than what we describe.

We just received a report stating that the world debt now stands at $152 Trillion, a totally un-payable debt. Some experts put the total world debt at $230 Trillion. It is reasonable to assume that the total debt does not include massive unfunded liabilities for future promises made by the politicians in exchange for votes, especially in America and Europe. Balance the total world debt against a nominal World Gross Product (WGP) of $75 Trillion. As many have said, the debt is unsustainable. There is no economy on the planet big enough to pay off this debt, even America's. The governments of the planet are bankrupt and their only answer is to add more debt by central bankers printing more worthless money. (Debt is just another word for slavery.)

Some of the debt comes from wars, but most of the debt is caused by the use of public money (taxes) in exchange for votes for left-leaning politicians, politicians who discovered that they could stay in power by exploiting human weakness with "other people's money." It's called socialism, or more correctly, the "full employment act" for liberal politicians.

As Maggy Thatcher said ..... "Socialism works until it runs out of other people's money." The world has run out of other people's money and is only left with debt, a debt that can only be paid by seizing all of the people's private assets, if the debt is ever to be re-paid. Government will eventually seize those assets and the people won't stop the government because the people are, for the most part, cowards.

But when the debt bubble bursts, massive famine and World War III are distinct possibilities. After the famine and wars are over, the globalists will then move in to seal the deal on one-world-government and some form of communism or socialism will be the new government, unless of course the cancer of radical Islam doesn't kill us off first. With the weapons of mass destruction that now exist, it won't be hard to keep the world population in control (enslaved), by whatever form of world government is finally created. If you will remember, after World War II, world governments created the United Nations, the first step to globalization. What will be created after World War III?

Besides globalism, the threats to freedom and American sovereignty just keep coming. In the title we mentioned that, "Radical Islam will kill us." The move to infiltrate Islam and Sharia law into the American institutions of government is well underway and has been for some time. The Trojan horse implementing this infiltration is the Muslim Brotherhood, an organization that has been supported by none other than Hillary Clinton and Barack Hussein Obama, the closet Muslim President of the United States. The Muslim Brotherhood is already well entrenched in North America.

From one source we learned that: "The Muslim Brotherhood is an Islamic organization founded in Ismailia, Egypt by Hassan al-Banna in March 1928 as an Islamist religious, political, and social movement. Al-Banna was a schoolteacher, to promote implementing traditional, religious, Islamic, Sharia law into government and a social regression based on an Islamic ethos of altruism and civic duty, in opposition to what he saw as political and social injustice and to British imperial rule. The organization initially focused on educational and charitable work, but quickly grew to become a major political force as well, by championing the cause of disenfranchised classes, playing a prominent role in the Egyptian nationalist movement, and promoting a conception of Islam that attempted to restore broken links between tradition and modernity."

The Brotherhood's ominous mission statement is quite clear:

“The process of settlement is a ‘Civilization-Jihadist Process’ with all the word means. The 'Ikhwan' (the Islamic brethren, a Wahhabi religious militia) must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and ’sabotaging’ its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God’s religion is made victorious over all other religions.”

The American group CAIR (Council on American Islamic Relations) has direct ties to the Muslim Brotherhood and supports the radical Palestine terrorist group, Hamas, a group funded by terrorist-exporter Iran and followers of the Muslim Brotherhood. Based on CAIR's history, "its major goal seems to be silencing and de-legitimizing its critics."

But the attack on America doesn't stop there. American communists/socialists have taken over the unions and the Democrat Party. Many members of Congress are card-carrying members of the Communist Party and its many affiliates, like the Democrat Socialists of America (DSA). At least 11 members of Congress that we know of are members of the DSA. To-wit: "John Conyers[Chairman of the Judiciary Committee], Tammy Baldwin, Jerrold Nadler, Luis Gutierrez, Melvin Watt, Maxine Waters, Hank Johnson, Steve Cohen, Barbara Lee, Robert Wexler, Linda Sanchez [there are 23 Democrats on the Judiciary Committee of which eleven, almost half, are now members of the DSA]." These Congressmen and women are outright communists and have influence over American public policy and legislation.

To understand where the DSA is coming from, one only needs to read Article II, "Our Purpose", of the DSA Constitution:

"We are socialists because we reject an economic order based on private profit, alienated labor, gross inequalities of wealth and power, discrimination based on race and sex, and brutality and violence in defense of the status quo. We are socialists because we share a vision of a humane social order based on popular control of resources and production, economic planning, equitable distribution, feminism, racial equality and non-oppressive relationships. We are socialists because we are developing a concrete strategy for achieving that vision, for building a majority movement that will make democratic socialism a reality in America. We believe that such a strategy must acknowledge the class structure of American society and that this class structure means that there is a basic conflict of interest between those sectors with enormous economic power and the vast majority of the population."

Bernie Sanders garnered millions of votes, mostly from naive millenials, touting the socialist/communist line. Bernie's early history included meetings with Russian and Nicaraguan Communists. The Democrat Party and Hillary moved radically left to capture Bernie voters.

The Revolutionary Communist Party has been instrumental in fomenting agitation in places like Oakland, New York City, Missouri, Ferguson and Baltimore over the alleged shootings or mistreatment of Blacks by police. The communists and the socialists can only survive by participating in the breakdown of civil society. But they can also survive by having socialist policies passed into law by government institutions, like the U. S. Congress.

Wealthy socialist Progressives like George Soros, have funded the Black Lives Matter movement to the tune of millions of dollars, a movement that has taken the honored tradition of peaceful protesting to the next level, anarchy. The Black Lives Matter movement is just a re-birth of the radical Black Panthers.

Hillary and Bill Clinton and much of the Democrat Party are tied directly to globalism, radical environmentalism, the climate change fraud, Black Lives Matter, communism, socialism and the Muslim Brotherhood, which seek to overthrow and "fundamentally transform" America (Obama's exact words) into a third-world socialist nation that will be forced to knuckle under to a world ruling class elite, made up of politicians, central bankers and industrialists.

So much of what we have written here has been documented in a Movie entitled, "Enemies Within." The Movie was written and produced by Trevor Loudon and directed by movie maker Judd Saul of Iowa. Executive Producers include Dennis Jackson and Kyle Kyllan. Rush Limbaugh, Glen Beck and several other conservatives, have promoted this powerful, revealing Movie.

We have paraphrased the DVD Trailer for the Movie: "Enemies Within zooms in on the best-kept secret of modern politics. Almost no one is aware of the fact that fewer than 20,000 U. S. communists, socialists and extreme 'Progressives' are able to influence the politicians and even write the laws that control the lives of over 300 million Americans. They have infiltrated the Democrat Party and the unions, they have used their lackeys in the Congress to ram through a radical socialist, communist and a union agenda, they have severely eased voting requirements and engaged in voter fraud, they have introduced mass educational indoctrination and have gutted our military."

We have seen the Movie in its entirety and even with all we know about what is going on, we came away shocked to the core. If even half of what is exposed in the Movie is true, it spells the end of America, as envisioned by the Founders, if one of the people they document in the Movie, Hillary Rodham Clinton, becomes president of the United States.

If you are truly interested, and you should be, you can order the DVD HERE. We encourage every one of our readers to take the time to view the Movie, before the election, if at all possible.

We further encourage each and every reader to forward this article to everyone on his or her list, well BEFORE THE ELECTION. Time is of the essence. We know that Trump is not a perfect presidential candidate by any stretch, but Hillary Clinton will fundamentally destroy America with malice aforethought and with a crooked smile on her face and disdain in her heart. America will be conquered by globalism under a Clinton Monarchy. And as we all know, Bill and Hillary will profit handsomely from the destruction of America's sovereignty and freedom.

On the other hand, Trump may actually be able to save America from the slide into socialism and global slavery. He may even be able to vigorously stir the pot and disrupt the establishment so bad, that the slide will be stopped in its tracks. At this point, what do Americans have to lose, except just about everything?

But then of course, if no one does ANYTHING, the globalists WILL enslave us and radical Islam will go on KILLING us.

We have put together a "LIST OF CONSTITUTIONAL DEMANDS" to government that if not met, all the things we predict in this article will come to pass. At that point the only viable alternative left to free Americans is the solution provided by the Declaration of Independence.

Please let us know that you FORWARDED the article. Constructive comments are welcome.

BILL, HILLARY, AND A CONVICTED PEDOPHILE, JEFFREY EPSTEIN

SEE: http://beforeitsnews.com/eu/2016/08/husband-of-prosecutor-investigating-bill-clinton-for-child-sex-charges-gunned-down-2610852.html

_______________________________________________________

BILL, HILLARY, AND A CONVICTED PEDOPHILE, JEFFREY EPSTEIN

SEE: http://newswithviews.com/Nelson/kelleigh359.htm; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

By Kelleigh Nelson

October 17, 2016
NewsWithViews.com

Elite deviance is a condition sociologists say exists in a society when the elite of that society no longer believe that the rules apply … to them. “It is not due primarily to psychopathological variables, but to the institutionalization of elite wrongdoing.” —Professor David Simon

You know, there's a difference between politicians and leaders. Politicians read poll numbers and compromise. Leaders do what's morally right. —Josh Fox

Shaping Public Opinion

The 2016 election is the most vitriolic and debased that I’ve ever seen. Granted the corruption and mudslinging by the Democratic candidate is beyond fiendish, but there have been others which were just as vile. The difference lies in subtlety. There is absolutely none this year. It is all out slander and libel about the Republican candidate. The media, the White House, the Department of Justice, the Democrats, and the neo-con Trotskyite Republicans are doing their best to make Trump more unlikeable than Hillary. It cannot be done.

The compliments by Miss Teen regarding Donald Trump will never see CNN, that is not their plan. Wikileaks even revealed the Clinton camp was posting FAKE “Sexist Trump Job Ads” on Craigslist. Hillary supporter, Jessica Leeds, claimed Trump groped her on a first-class flight in the early 80s. Her story has been proven to be another lie, and a witness from the plane came forward and exposed her. [Link]

Trump’s former Mar-a-Lago butler, Anthony Senecal has stated that all these claims are absolutely false, and he should know because he was there for years, even when Trump was single. Senecal blames Trump’s democratic opponent, Hillary Clinton. All of the allegations have been immediately debunked…

The narrative today is through the roof against Donald J. Trump…all because he’s an outsider and is not a member of the globalist cabal. The media is using every polling mechanism available in the hope of swaying the public. They’re trying to tell us that Mr. Trump’s supporters are abandoning him because he’s guilty of whatever crimes the media has blamed him for…he hates women, he’s the sexual assaulter, he’s the misogynist. This is what the Clinton owned socialist media is telling us. It’s blah, blah, blah, he’s rotten and evil … and we hear that all day long. They promote Hillary as the little princess who will come in and save the day. What absolute bull dung!

So, TURN IT OFF!

Unlikeable Hillary

Hillary Clinton is so unlikeable that she often disappears, whether because of health, or because it’s better to keep her out of the limelight. As I mentioned in a previous article, Bill and Hillary hired Steven Spielberg to help her become more likeable. She ditched the effort, saying she’d be herself. In high school, we called her Sister Frigidaire because her personality was so cold, and it hasn’t changed one iota; it’s actually gotten much worse.

Hillary’s rallies are always small; she doesn’t inspire anyone…only those in our electorate who lean heavily to Marxism. Her entire campaign is not on how she will lead the nation, but on how horrible and “deplorable” Trump and his supporters are.

Bill Clinton’s former press secretary, Dee Dee Myers said, “In her personal life, she always seemed like she had something to hide.” One of her biographers, Carl Bernstein, noted that she indulged in “subterfuge and eliding.” This explains why all the likeability lessons in the world weren’t going to change her or put a stop to her lies.

According to Ed Klein, in his amazing expose, Unlikeable, he quotes one of Hillary’s acquaintances who said, “She freely admits she’s always had anger issues when she’s annoyed by people, which is often, it shows.” They went on to say, “She looks at her critics as a handful of nuts. Her outburst during the Senate committee hearing on Benghazi-- ‘What difference does it make?’—was in total keeping with her pattern of behavior.

Something snaps when she’s under pressure and emotional stress. As much as anything else, Bill pushed the Spielberg likeability lessons on Hillary in order to avoid another meltdown like Benghazi when she hit the campaign trail.”

Hillary Mellows?

Hillary’s friends claimed she had mellowed with age, that her famous temper was under control, that she didn’t vent or get physically aggressive like she used to, that she didn’t poke people in the chest with her forefinger, or throw hard objects at their heads…all was in the past. There was a new Hillary with composure and the maturity to be the president of the United States.

Trouble is, the falsely painted picture of this violent, aggressive, and vitriolic woman didn’t last long.

Bill, Hillary, and Democrat Mega Donor, Jeffrey Epstein

Virginia Roberts, who alleged in court documents that Bill Clinton visited convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein’s private island, where he witnessed sexual orgies, stated, “There were times when I was physically abused to the point that I remember fearfully thinking that I didn’t know whether I was going to survive.”

Hillary accused Bill of not wanting her to be president since his libido had gotten into the news again, and she was about to announce her run for president. Obviously, this brought up Bill’s past encounters with Sally Miller, Juanita Broaddrick, Gennifer Flowers, Paula Jones, Kathleen Willey, Dolly Kyle Browning, Elizabeth Ward Gracen, and Monika Lewinsky.

Bill had consorted many times with convicted pedophile and registered sex offender, Jeffrey Epstein. Between 2002 and 2003, Bill was on Epstein’s plane and was accompanied to Africa by Epstein’s close companion, Ghislaine Maxwell, the daughter of the late, and disgraced, British newspaper tycoon,Robert Maxwell. Ghislaine was later accused of recruiting underage girls for Epstein.

Epstein had a Boeing 727, a black Gulfstream, a Cessna 421, and a helicopter for jaunts all over the world. Bill used Epstein to fly (without secret service) to South Africa, Nigeria, Ghana, Mozambique…all of which was pitched to Epstein by Doug Band, Bill’s advance man, founder and head of Teneo, which I wrote about some time ago.

Epstein even flew Bill to Hong Kong on his plane, the “Lolita Express.” Bill used the plane for countless trips to Russia, and China. When Epstein was arrested, Bill allegedly cut ties with the billionaire.

Flight logs show that Bill Clinton flew on Epstein’s private plane at least 11 times, including once when a soft-core porn star was on board. —Photo:
Gregory P. Mango

The New York Post wrote, “Bill’s Libido Threatens to Derail Hillary—Again”
The Clinton Foundation had accepted a $25,000 donation from Epstein in 2006, and Epstein’s “Madam,” Ghislaine Maxwell was a guest at Chelsea’s wedding in 2010.

Hillary’s Enraged Meltdown

All of this became public knowledge when several of Epstein’s alleged victims surfaced in 2011. Epstein had paid off more than 30 cases out of court, and spent 13 months in the Palm Beach County Stockade for soliciting a minor for prostitution.

One of the alleged victims, Virginia Roberts, charged that Bill Clinton had visited Epstein’s one-hundred-acre private island in St. Thomas, called Little Saint James, where he witnessed sexual orgies, although she stated he did not participate. Roberts states that she met Bill twice, but was told by Epstein that they were good friends.

Roberts believed Bill certainly knew about Jeffrey’s girls because there were three desks in the living area of the villa on the island and they were covered with pictures of Jeffrey shaking hands with famous people as well as photos of naked girls, including Virginia in a hammock. (Page 199, Unlikeable)

Even after Epstein was released from prison in Florida, he was able to allure prominent figures in the world of entertainment and television news to his dinner table, including Woody Allen, George Stephanopoulos and Katie Couric. (Page 199, Unlikeable)

Epstein hadn’t paid off all the women to keep them quiet, and they were suing him under the Crime Victims’ Act. Hillary wanted pressure put on him to settle so the problem would go away. Some of these girls’ lawyers wanted Bill to be a material witness and testify. They had to be contacted and told they couldn’t call the former president and put him in a compromising position, but it was Hillary who was worried…and she wasn’t easily placated.

An infuriated Hillary told one of Clinton’s trusted legal advisors, “Can you really make this f**king thing go away? My head is going to explode if I hear one more thing about this damn degenerate.”

Stand By Your Man, and Woman

In 1998, at the height of the Lewinsky scandal and looming impeachment, Bill managed to save his own presidency, in large part because Hillary stood by her man. In return, Bill was meant to do what it took when it was her turn to run.

If, on some level, he wanted her to lose the nomination, he did a great job, both in 2008, and now in 2016. What became clear to Hillary’s camp during the 2008 campaign, according to the book, “Game Change,” was that Bill Clinton would do whatever he wanted to do. His blow-up right before the South Carolina primary, in which he called Obama’s anti-war stance “a fairy tale,” led to Hillary’s crushing defeat.

The “Blood Feud” between the Clinton’s and Obama’s still exists, but Obama wants his policies continued, and Hillary wants the White House, so a temporary truce has been called.

Conclusion

Think about what Hillary would do to this nation, aside from being a continuation of the Obama administration. The last vestiges of freedom and liberty would be destroyed. Hillary wants open borders, open trade, 550% more Muslims than Obama and once and for all destroying the vibrant economy Americans enjoyed for so long before NAFTA.

And yes, a dozen years ago, Donald exchanged titillating off-color words with Billy Bush. It has already been proven that this tape was edited, and I know that Trump doesn’t remember what was actually said in the exchange that long ago.

Bimbo eruptions are Bill Clinton’s modus operandi, not Donald Trump’s. It has already been proven that the Clinton-endorsing women who are claiming Donald Trump tried to touch them, are liars.

Hillary is so afraid of Donald Trump and so afraid of the issues he brings to the table that she must destroy him on a personal level.

The only candidate who will save America is Donald Trump. The supreme court, trade agreements, immigration, and the Islamic invasion are all in the balance.

BARNA STUDY: "MORE THAN FOUR OUT OF TEN EVANGELICALS" REJECTING BOTH TRUMP & CLINTON

BARNA STUDY: 

"MORE THAN FOUR OUT OF TEN EVANGELICALS" 

REJECTING BOTH TRUMP & CLINTON 

BY HEATHER CLARK

SEE: http://christiannews.net/2016/10/18/barna-study-more-than-four-out-of-ten-evangelicals-rejecting-both-clinton-and-trump/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

A recent Barna study shows that although many of those who identify as evangelical support the presidential candidacy of Republican nominee Donald Trump, more than four out of ten evangelicals currently reject both Trump and Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton.

The organization surveyed 1,023 adults, including 627 likely voters, to conduct its study. Those expressing support for Trump included evangelicals (55 percent for Trump as opposed to 2 percent for Clinton), those who claim to have a biblical worldview (57 percent to 30 percent), and those who believe in absolute moral truth (48 percent to 37 percent).

Those supporting Clinton included those who profess to be Christians but are not born again (48 percent for Clinton to 36 percent for Trump), those who identify with other faiths ( 37 percent to 30 percent), atheists and agnostics (61 percent to 18 percent), and Roman Catholics (45 percent to 35 percent).



But Barna found that while some have selected a side, others have stated that they don’t feel comfortable with voting for either candidate.

“Although Trump has a huge lead over Clinton among evangelicals, the most noteworthy finding in this regard is that more than four out of ten evangelicals currently refuse to vote for either of those two candidates,” analyst George Barna said in an Oct. 10 post, outlining the results.

“Nearly three out of ten are presently undecided, making them the largest block of undecided votes still up for grabs,” he stated, and “[o]ne out of eight evangelicals plan to protest the quality of the major party candidates by voting for a third-party or independent candidate.”

“This behavior by evangelicals is unique over the course of the last nine election cycles,” he said, advising that if the election were held now, the evangelical vote for the Republican candidate would be 20 percentage points less than what it has been he last five elections.

Although not a part of the Barna study, among those rejecting both candidates includes John Piper, chancellor of Bethlehem College and Seminary in Minneapolis, Minnesota. He Tweeted last week following the release of the 2005 Trump sexual assault boasting tape that “Trump should step down,” but “[s]o should Hillary.”

“That is what ‘unqualified’ means. It’s never been a question,” he said.

Wayne Grudem, professor of Theology and Biblical Studies at Phoenix Seminary, withdrew his endorsement of Trump following the release of the video and after reviewing sexually-charged remarks made on the Howard Stern Show. He noted that he couldn’t vote for Clinton either and wasn’t sure what to do.

“I am not now sure who I am going to vote for. I absolutely will not vote for Clinton,” Grudem said.

Erick Erickson of The Resurgent also opined earlier this year that Christians shouldn’t feel obligated to choose between Clinton and Trump, and advised that he will not do so personally.

“I have come to the conclusion that Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump are just two forms of evil. Just because Donald Trump’s evil has an elephant mascot does not make his evil more acceptable than Hillary Clinton’s,” he said. “I take Charles Spurgeon’s view that between two evils, I should choose neither.”

“Christians are under no obligation to pick the lesser of two evils or judge between the evils of two lessers,” Erickson wrote. “We can withhold our endorsement by withholding our vote. We have the right to participate in the process, but just because we have the right does not mean we have to exercise that right.”

Guest poster Brian Mattson, senior scholar of public theology for the Center for Cultural Leadership, echoed Erickson’s remarks on Monday.

“I believe the promotion and support of Donald Trump by Christian leaders is just as damaging to Christian public witness as the prospect of a Clinton presidency,” he wrote. “Under Clinton, we may eventually be muzzled. Under Trump, we might be free to broadcast from the rooftops, but everyone will ignore us [for compromising on morality]. Rightly ignore us.”

“I believe the Christian reaction to this election should be sackcloth and ashes. Revulsion and repentance,” Mattson said. “I have made my decision, and all I can do is commend it to you: I refuse to lend my name to either candidate.”

FBI FILES: HILLARY CLINTON STOLE FURNITURE FROM STATE DEPARTMENT OFFICES

FBI FILES: HILLARY CLINTON STOLE FURNITURE FROM STATE DEPT.

FBI agent accuses Hillary Clinton of taking government property to her house

SEE: http://www.infowars.com/fbi-files-hillary-clinton-stole-furniture-from-state-dept/; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

Document comes from the FBI’s 100 page release of their investigation into Clinton and State Dept. mishandling of classified information on private servers.

 

This is not the first time Clinton has been accused of stealing from the Federal Government.

Back in 2002 it came out that the Clintons had taken $190,000 worth of china, rugs, furniture, T.V.’s and other items to their home when they left The White House.

After this went public they announced they would pay for $86,000 worth of gifts, or nearly half the amount.

FORMER CLINTON CHEF: HILLARY CALLED BLACK SERVANT THE "N-WORD"

FORMER CLINTON CHEF: HILLARY CALLED BLACK SERVANT THE "N-WORD"

Published on Oct 17, 2016

A former travel chef in the Clinton White House claims that he personally witnessed Hillary Clinton angrily call a black servant the 'n-word'.

If accusations of Trump's sexism are worthy of blanket press attention, are accusations of Hillary's racism equally worthy?

Will the media dare touch this story?

FREEDOM VS TYRANNY~THE FINAL SHOWDOWN DEBATE BETWEEN TRUMP & CLINTON

Trump Fifteen Points Ahead In Poll

Published on Oct 17, 2016

Despite the continual attacks on Donald Trump by the mainstream media he is pulling ahead of crooked Hillary Clinton.

Hillary Clinton Attacks Alex Jones And Infowars In New Campaign Ad

Published on Oct 17, 2016

Hillary Clinton is desperately trying to destroy Donald Trump even going so far as to mention Alex Jones by name and now putting Alex Jones in one of her campaign ads.

"MAKE SOROS HAPPY": CLINTON CAMPAIGN DISCUSSES IMPORTANCE OF PLEASING BILLIONAIRE IN LEAKED EMAIL

"MAKE SOROS HAPPY": CLINTON CAMPAIGN DISCUSSES IMPORTANCE OF PLEASING BILLIONAIRE IN LEAKED EMAIL

"I would only do this for political reasons (i.e. to make Soros happy)," the email states

BY Mikael Thalen

SEE: http://www.infowars.com/make-soros-happy-clinton-campaign-discusses-importance-of-pleasing-billionaire-in-leaked-email/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

Members of Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign discussed the political importance of pleasing billionaire George Soros in emails published by WikiLeaks.

The email, among thousands allegedly hacked from Clinton campaign Chairman John Podesta, reveals a discussion between several prominent figures – including campaign manager Robby Mook and Clinton aide Huma Abedin – regarding the organization “America Votes.”



“I would only do this for political reasons (ie to make Soros happy),” Mook tells Abedin. “It’s very unclear to me how much AV will matter next cycle. And I haven’t seen then [sic] adding any value this cycle. I also worry a little it will cause donor confusion vis a vis Priorities.”

America Votes, which works “with over 400 state and national partner organizations to advance progressive policies, win elections, and protect every American’s right to vote,” has received millions in funding from Soros.

“She is having dinner with George Soros tonight,” Abedin responds. “Do you know much about America Votes? As Greg Speed explained to me, they are the coordinated campaign for various outside groups. Soros is a big supporter of the group and hes [sic] going to ask her tonight if she will come to a fundraiser for them at his house in December. Thoughts?”

Several other emails released in the Podesta dump also reveal the Clinton campaign’s close ties with the nefarious philanthropist.

GENERATION OF TYRANTS~SNOWFLAKE NATION: HOW PANDERLY PARENTING IS CREATING THEM

SNOWFLAKE NATION: HOW PANDERLY PARENTING IS CREATING A GENERATION OF TYRANTS

BY SELWYN DUKE

SEE: http://www.thenewamerican.com/culture/family/item/24293-snowflake-nation-how-panderly-parenting-is-creating-a-generation-of-tyrants; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

When you treat your son like the sun and orbit around him as if he’s his own little solar system’s center, don’t be surprised when he supernovas at every imagined slight. So says a Michigan college professor, in so many words, in a new book examining the origins of the “snowflake” college-student phenomenon.

The book is Political Correctness and the Destruction of Social Order: Chronicling the Rise of the Pristine Self, by Oakland University professor emeritus Howard Schwartz. After years of studying the psychology animating political correctness, Schwartz says that modern society is breeding large numbers of quasi-narcissists who cannot tolerate any questioning of their delusion-born self-image. Writes the College Fix:

Schwartz, who taught classes in social and behavioral science within its [Oakland U’s] business school, said the term stems from what he calls “the rise of the pristine self.”

Schwartz writes in the book that “this is a self that is touched by nothing but love. The problem is that nobody is touched by nothing but love, and so if a person has this as an expectation, if they have built their sense of themselves around this premise, the inevitable appearance of the something other than love blows this structure apart.”

He added in his interview that “the over sensitivity of individuals today, including political correctness and micro-aggressions, all stem from this idea that people operating under the notion of the pristine self view you as evil because you are showing them something other than love.”

Schwartz points to the rise of helicopter parents and capitulating campus administrations as contributing to this phenomenon.

“People now experience the entire world as a form of bullying. The helicopter parent protects the children from real dangers but also fantasy dangers. These precious snowflakes are the children of political correctness, their parents and schools lead them to believe that the world is perfectly moralistic — they don’t live in the real world, it is a fantasy,” he said.  

Prof. Schwartz says that universities exacerbate this problem by becoming “matriarchal institutions” that pander to and coddle already callow undergraduates. As a very timely example, the Washington Free Beacon has just reported that the University of Florida is “providing around-the-clock counseling services to students who are offended by Halloween costumes.” And this now reflects the norm. Word has it that students today are flooding college mental-health centers; this, of course, is encouraged by the psychological profession, as a growing snowflake mentality grows its market and coffers.

This coddling is what has given us demands for, as Schwartz wrote in February, “safe spaces,” trigger warnings, and protection from micro-aggressions” from students who “work upon the assumption that they deserve a ‘pristine self’ unchallenged by invalidating ideas or opinions.” What is a micro-aggression? Schwartz explained that “Derald Wing Sue, godfather of the concept, defined ‘micro-aggression’ as ‘the brief and everyday slights, insults, indignities and denigrating messages sent to people of color by well-intentioned White people who are unaware of the hidden messages being communicated’” (video below of Professor Sue discussing the destructive concept).

This all sounds like the musings and concerns of people with too much time on their hands. And that “an idle mind is the Devil’s playground” is a factor. Yet there’s more to it. Let’s examine Prof. Schwartz’ thesis.

The Little Prince Phenomenon

Children are born self-centered, mainly because, as philosopher G.K. Chesterton put it, they have “a self.” And just as languages are learned best when young, so is morality and tolerance for criticism and for the denial of desires. Yet “As the twig is bent, so grows the tree”; a child whose natural petulance and tyrannical instincts aren’t tamed may never “grow out of it.”

Now, we all know that stereotype of the coddled and spoiled ancient royal who from childhood is surrounded by luxury and fawning servants and is treated as a demigod whose every whim is satisfied. How common such an individual was, even among royalty, is not the point; it is, rather, that we wouldn’t be surprised if such a person grew up a narcissist, intolerant of the slightest criticism and demanding continual validation of his deific self-image.

In a way, this is precisely the upbringing many children have today. In fact, contemporary civilization — with supermarkets stocked with “wedding food,” modern conveniences, abounding recreational and entertainment opportunities, and lots of free time — offers a lifestyle of which ancient royals couldn’t even dream. This is combined with permissive, Dr. Spock-disgorged parenting. Children may be treated as if their flatulence is floral aroma, rarely receiving criticism and being lavished with praise for doing what is merely obligatory. And it may not be that just spanking is anathema, but that “punishment” is a dirty word and that every strong word may be avoided for fear of damaging “self-esteem,” which has become a euphemism for the sin of pride. The result? Spoiled, self-entitled brats and rampant “ADHD,” which psychologist Dr. John Rosemond has called “the extending of toddlerhood indefinitely.”

This stunted moral, emotional, and spiritual development can beget young adults who seem to have the maturity of 10-year-olds. And they often demand from their college professors and others the kind of homage, deference, and kid-gloves treatment their dysfunctional upbringing has conditioned them to expect. As Prof. Schwartz put it, such individuals “see themselves as being micro-aggressed against when an interaction does not support their feelings of goodness and importance, in the terms they use to define their own goodness and importance. The basis upon which they feel validated is never defended, or even openly stated — but it is assumed to be understood and its validity self-evident.” Sure. Their parents understood how to buttress their egos. Why shouldn’t everyone else?

Love ... or Something Else?

Yet does this mentality really reflect a “self that is touched by nothing but love”? After all, love doesn’t mean being an enabler. It doesn’t mean giving an alcoholic a bottle of gin or a heroin addict his fix — or a child his ego fix — merely because he demands such. Love means not always giving a person what he wants, but what he needs.

In contrast, pandering parents may be exhibiting not love but emotional dependence, at least to a great degree. Someone emotionally dependent upon another will deliver that gin or fix, whatever is necessary to gain or maintain the affection he wants. So where love is selfless, emotional dependence is selfish — and it’s easy to confuse the two. This isn’t to say such parents have no love for their children. But all human love is imperfect, and, in the least, whatever love they do have isn’t guided by wisdom.

Yet there’s an even deeper issue here. Prof. Schwartz quotes an observation by columnist Megan McArdle, who wrote, “Today's students don't couch their demands in the language of morality, but in the jargon of safety. They don't want you to stop teaching books on difficult themes because those books are wrong, but because they're dangerous, and should not be approached without a trigger warning. They don't want to silence speakers because their ideas are evil, but because they represent a clear and present danger to the university community.” There’s a simple reason for this:

These students don’t actually believe in morality. 

As I often point out, 2002 Barna Group research found that only six percent of teenagers believe in Truth, properly defined as something absolute and existing apart from man; almost all are moral relativists and are most likely to make “moral” decisions based on feelings.

And there you have it. Stating the obvious, a Truth-oriented person’s main question always is “Is it true?” When people don’t believe in Truth, however, they can no longer use it as a yardstick for making decisions and then fall back on that guide that feels oh-so right: their own feelings. Moreover, in this relativistic universe, there can be no right or wrong, good or evil. Then the matter of whether something is one or the other is subordinated to “Is it liberal or conservative?” “Is it healthful or not so?” or “Is it safe or dangerous?” — with emotion being the ultimate arbiter.

Of course, this can also be a tactic by the more Machiavellian sorts. You appear a tyrant if you persecute someone merely because he’s (supposedly) wrong. If he’s “dangerous,” however? Then you’re a savior administering justice.

Regardless, as the overgrown children and demagogues they enable “macro-aggress” upon morality and its daughter freedom, they make all of America a very unsafe space for everyone. 

"THERE IS A LOT OF VOTE FRAUD": NEW YORK CITY DEMOCRAT ELECTION COMMISSIONER ON CAMERA

Greater Threat Than Ever For WWIII, Rigged Elections

Democrat Election Commissioner Caught on Camera Admits: “There Is a Lot of Vote Fraud”

BY SELWYN DUKE

SEE: http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/item/24296-democrat-election-commissioner-caught-on-camera-admits-there-is-a-lot-of-vote-fraud; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

Are elections in the United States being stolen? Establishment Democrats say no, claiming publicly that vote fraud doesn’t exist — but what they say privately may be a different story. And a startling admission by NYC’s Democrat Commissioner of the Board of Elections Alan Schulkin is a case in point.

The revealing comments were caught on hidden camera by a Project Veritas (PR) undercover reporter at a United Federation of Teachers holiday party. As PV reports, “Yeah, they should ask for your ID. I think there is a lot of voter fraud," said Schulkin, who elaborated on the types of voter fraud that are taking place in New York. "You know, I don’t think it’s too much to ask somebody to show some kind of an ID…. Like I say, people don’t realize, certain neighborhoods in particular they bus people around to vote," said Schulkin. When asked about which type of neighborhoods the busing of voters takes place in, Schulkin confirmed that it was minority neighborhoods, adding, "They get buses and they move people around.” (Video below.)

I reported on the phenomenon of rampant vote fraud in minority neighborhoods in 2005 in “Democrats and Deep Vote fraud,” citing information given to me, exclusively, by a Washington, D.C. community leader. Among other issues, transiency is a problem in such neighborhoods, with people moving in and out of the areas frequently. This leaves many former residents on voter rolls — and their absence is well known to local, area-savvy political operatives called “block captains” or “apartment captains.” All these operatives need do then is vote, or have others vote, in these departed residents’ stead. (Note: I was still on the rolls when I left NYC more than 20 years ago. Anyone could have voted in my former precinct claiming to be “Selwyn Duke” and no one would have been any the wiser.)

Schulkin also “suggested that Mayor Bill de Blasio was to blame for a lot of the voter fraud taking place in New York City,” writes PV. The commissioner explained:

He gave out ID cards, de Blasio. That’s in lieu of a driver’s license, but you can use it for anything. But, they didn’t vet people to see who they really are. Anybody can go in there and say I am Joe Smith, I want an ID card. It’s absurd. There’s a lot of fraud. Not just voter fraud, all kinds of fraud.

This is why I’m getting more conservative as I get older.

The PV journalist also asked about absentee-ballot fraud, to which Schulkin replied, “Oh, there’s thousands of absentee ballots. I don’t know where they came from.”

Imagine that: He’s the election commissioner — and he has no idea where the absentee ballots come from.

Schulkin struck an even more politically incorrect note by mentioning Muslims. As Breitbart reported:

When the journalist suggests that in addition to voter ID fraud, people can also “cover their faces” when they vote, Schulkin agrees, saying, “Well the Muslims can do that too. You don’t know who they are.”

The PV journalist then tells Schulkin that Mayor Bill de Blasio “wants to let them [Muslims] in New York.”

“He doesn’t care, what does he care?” the commissioner replies. “Who’s going to pay for it? You are. Your tax money…. Your vote isn’t really counting because they can go in there with a burka on and you don’t know if they are a voter.”

“People think that it’s a liberal thing to do, but I take my vote seriously and I don’t want ten other people coming in negating my vote by voting for the other candidate when they’re not even registered voters,” Schulkin adds.

Not surprisingly, Schulkin’s truthful utterances didn’t sit well with other Democrats. NYC mayoral spokesman Austin Finan called the allegations “racist” and claimed that voter fraud “fear-mongering is a right wing smokescreen designed to … disenfranchise the poor and people of color.” Interesting theory, especially since the White House itself touted a voter-ID program in 2013 — apparently funded with some U.S. tax dollars — in Kenya. It was not explained how requiring voter ID of poor American blacks is “racist” and suppressive of the vote, but requiring it of far poorer Kenyan blacks is praiseworthy.

Then there’s that other person laying down the “right-wing smokescreen,” Hillary Clinton. An e-mail recently released by WikiLeaks shows that her campaign believes that in 2008 Obama operatives “flooded the caucuses with ineligible voters.” And her “racist” self was apparently joined by the United Nations. Remember when the Democrats requested UN observers for our 2012 election because they allegedly feared Republican vote suppression? Well, those observers found no such thing, but they did say they were “shocked to see that the requirement of a photo ID isn’t a standard requirement at voting locations throughout the country,” reported Breitbart at the time. Note also that it is a standard requirement for most anything else, from receiving government benefits to entering buildings (e.g., the White House) to flying on airplanes.

And we should definitely listen to (the private) Schulkin, (the private) Clinton, and the UN because vote fraud abounds. As The Federalist writes, “In Colorado, multiple instances were found of dead people attempting to vote. Stunningly, ‘a woman named Sara Sosa who died in 2009 cast ballots in 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013.’ In Virginia, it was found that nearly 20 voter applications were turned in under the names of dead people. In Texas, authorities are investigating criminals who are using the technique of ‘vote harvesting’ to illegally procure votes for their candidates.” (Note: The Virginia fraud was discovered only accidentally, when a registrar’s office employee recognized an applicant’s name and knew the person had recently died.) Moreover, reports liberal NPR, “A new report by the Pew Center on the States finds that more than 1.8 million dead people are currently registered to vote. And 24 million registrations are either invalid or inaccurate.”

Our voting system is so anarchic it has inspired humor, with satire site the People’s Cube recently writing, “The latest Reuters polling of deceased voters in Ohio, Wisconsin, New Hampshire, Florida, and North Carolina show a definite trend favoring Hillary Clinton and Democrat congressional candidates, as the likely dead voters are registering Democrat in massive numbers. Dead Democrats, as well as Republicans who switched parties right after internment, are rising in droves chanting, ‘We Are Stronger Together.’” Yet this is no laughing matter. There is no voter-ID requirement in 19 states, including swing states Pennsylvania and North Carolina, while 15 others allow non-photo ID. And 21 percent of the 24 million invalid or inaccurate voter registrations could have accounted for Obama’s five million popular vote margin over Mitt Romney in 2012 — and far less than that would have been necessary to flip a number of crucial swing states.

Of course, it’s unlikely that vote fraud accounted for Obama’s entire margin of victory. It’s also definite we’ll never be sure about such things until we listen to certain Democrats, during their private moments, and stop running our elections as if we’re a banana republic.

______________________________________________________________

SEE ALSO:

http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/item/24302-guiliani-dead-people-generally-vote-for-democrats