Translate

Wednesday, March 27, 2019

DAVID WOOD: NEW ZEALAND MOSQUE LEADER BLAMES JEWS FOR CHRISTCHURCH TERROR ATTACK~EX-MUSLIMS SILENCED


DAVID WOOD: NEW ZEALAND MOSQUE LEADER BLAMES JEWS FOR CHRISTCHURCH TERROR ATTACK 
Following the New Zealand mosque attacks in Christchurch, mosque leader Ahmed Bhamji claimed at the "Love Aotearoa, Hate Racism" rally that Mossad (Israel's national intelligence agency) was behind the NZ shooting, and that local Jewish businesses were funding terrorist Brenton Tarrant. Since Ahmed Bhamji is a prominent Muslim leader, and even hosted Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern at his Masjid e Umar, shouldn't New Zealand Muslims and especially Prime Minister Ardern be publicly condemning Bhamji's statements?
David Wood discusses the issue.
PRIME MINISTER THANKS HIM

Ex-Muslims Silenced after New Zealand Mosque Attack 

(David Wood)

Following the New Zealand mosque attacks in Christchurch, critics of Islam are being blocked, banned, and de-platformed. For instance, ex-Muslim Armin Navabi, founder of Atheist Republic, recently had his talk at Mount Royal University in Calgary canceled due to complaints after the NZ shootings. Should universities be silencing critics of Islam? David Wood discusses the issue.
SEE ALSO:

THE INCREASING PRESENCE OF ISLAM IN THE WEST BRINGS MORE TERROR FROM BOTH MUSLIMS & NON-MUSLIMS

THE INCREASING PRESENCE OF ISLAM IN THE WEST BRINGS MORE TERROR FROM BOTH MUSLIMS 
& NON-MUSLIMS
SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2019/03/the-increasing-presence-of-islam-in-the-west-brings-more-terror-from-both-muslims-and-non-muslimsrepublished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
British authorities are still following leads to track down the source of the cluster of four or five London and Glasgow package bombs that were discovered in the first week of March 2019. A mysterious group calling itself the “New IRA” is reportedly claiming responsibility. That internationally-designated terrorist group has used that “NIRA” name since 2012, and has roots dating back to a split in 1997. The splinter group had rejected the IRA’s declared ceasefire.
But for what purpose were the bombs sent? What could anybody possibly be trying to achieve by this horrible tactic, other than to create terror among random, innocent people? Terror seems to be an irrational act. But it works. And so it continues to be be used as a tactic, precisely because it causes group behavioral modification within the society that it targets. And so then the more that we accommodate the ideology behind the terror, in our hopes to pacify it, the more the terror tactic becomes validated as an effective tool for the terrorist.
Random acts of terror like this are also a model by which Islam gains power. Sahih al-Bukhari (52:220) plainly declares that terror was used by Muhammad, precisely because he recognized it as a winning strategy: “ Allah’s Apostle said… ‘I have been made victorious with terror’. ” A daily glance at the Islamic world shows random bombings and killings, with no apparent purpose. Victims of such Islamic attacks tend to be random and are often dehumanized by the killers as “non-Muslim.” But whether random or targeted, the attacks only prove that killings and terror become part of the Islamic society package, wherever Muslims form a large presence.
In a way, it does not matter precisely that this new group of London attackers, or some others we have had to endure in recent years, are not Muslims. Attackers who use terror as a tool are now often anarchic Leftists, fringe separatists, or kooks. But what we can see is that the tactic of terror used by these groups is like an Islamic attack. And the Islamic attack model has been validated by Muslims for fourteen centuries, because Muhammad used it, and Quranic Allah approved it.
Adherents of any ideology that calls for destruction of the West, or for any minor political cause, will now terrorize and kill crowds of innocents, largely because Muslims before them have terrorized and killed in this random way. Muslims acting in jihad have set the bar of violence expectation lower in the West, for all kinds of sociopathic kooks to copy their methods.
Systemic violence in the Islamic world should warn us on face value that, the more Muslims we bring in from those places, the more jihadis and teachers of Islamic terror we will get among them. And at the same time, the more we accommodate Islam to try to pacify it, the more we validate its tool of terror as effective. And then also, the more copycat kooks we will get, who will more readily adopt the Islamic methods of setting off random, indiscriminate terror bombs and acts of slaughter.
The mass slaughter in Las Vegas was somewhat like that. The purpose, motive, influence and training have never been officially determined, even though Islamic State claimed credit for the operation as its own. But even if Stephen Paddock is never to be clearly linked to ISIS, the prior Islamic State and al Qaeda terror attacks established the concept for such a terrible attack, in its wanton randomness.
So Islam is a wide threat, because each one of its attacks serves as a model for any twisted people who want to do mass damage to our society, for any reason, or for no reason at all. The horrors that we have seen performed by Islamic State will be coming to America, by one group of evil killers or another.
Such random acts of terror may seem inexplicable. But in fact, there are two main ideologies that use such terror, with intent to destroy our society. Their shared goal, after they cause destruction of our society, is to bring conquest.
The first and oldest of those organized forces of destruction is Islam. It is a supremacist ideology of conquest that seeks to bring every person on Earth under its control, based on Quran commands and the “excellent example” that it claims in the life of Muhammad, a conquering warlord.
The second ideology of societal mass destruction is Marxism. That is a pseudo-religious doctrine of Leftist collectivism, whose counterpart to Muhammad is Karl Marx. His bizarre envisioning was of “New Man” communists who would run the means of production by an absence of profitable self-interest, to serve all people in a “final” form of future society. Those mythical humans would be satisfied to subordinate themselves to the needs of the collective. They would somehow come into being after the removal of concentrated private capital from power over control of production.
And to prepare the path for that “New Man” to emerge, Marx viciously attacked humanity’s religions, just as Muhammad had done to build his own ancient cult. Both men clearly recognized that popular faiths were competitive forces of spiritual defense against submission to the cult’s conquest. As total collectives by design, the cults demand submission from all people. But “non-believers” stand in the way. They must be terrorized into submission.
Marx first imagined that the emerging mass industrialization would simply sweep away the capitalists, and then would naturally leave production in the hands of his imaginary new kind of benevolent people. But history soon proved that nothing would sweep away capitalists, except by violent revolution. And so then, ever since mass slaughter was carried out by the Russian Revolution to create the first Communist state, the anarchist agents of Marxist collectivism have wielded terror as a tool.
These twin, pseudo-utopian ideologies share a key premise, which is their need to first take down the existing order of our society. They presume an ability to build their utopia on the wreckage, either bit by bit, or by total revolution. And so, agents of Islam and Marxism will keep trying to intimidate and terrify us. They need to make us feel fear and despair, so that we will cave into their control demands. They can also achieve much of that control without violence, whenever we become simply too passive.
From the Islamic Movement in this century, we have seen Muslims commit unspeakable horrors that were not previously well-known in modern history. In building terror armies, observant Muslims have been massively recruited and easily taught and led into slave-taking, torture and killing, by authoritative imams who have risen to power as respected scholars, with doctorate degrees in Islamic Studies, as graduates of the hundreds of Islamic universities.
In contemporary America and Europe, horrific mass attacks and stealth invasion in the cause of Islam have become standard tactics by the Islamic Movement in our recent decades. If left unchecked, in time, the enlarged and empowered Islamic presence in the West will bring yet higher levels of wreckage, that will begin to rival the atrocities that occur daily within the Islamic Middle East. The doctrine embedded as verses in Quran demands it.
Similarly, from the Marxist Collectivist Movement in the modern era, mass slaughters of tens of millions of subjugated people in far-away lands have been staggering.  But here at home, we have only begun to endure such terrors on a small scale, brought to us by the revolutionary Left. But they are persistent.
In the 1960s, Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) plotted the revolutionary overthrow of America. David Horowitz was once a leading member of communist groups like that. Other terror groups like The Weathermen and The Weather Underground (led by later Obama-enablers, Bill Ayers and his wife Bernardine Dohrn) set off bombs in America.
In the 1970s, The Symbionese Liberation Army (SLA), a Marxist revolutionary movement, kidnapped billionaire heiress Patty Hearst, and robbed banks to fund their warfare against the system. The Black Panther Party openly carried weapons and engaged in open warfare with police.
In 2011 under Obama, Occupy Wall Street, later expanded as Occupy, caused street chaos which morphed into blocked freeways. In 2014, the Ferguson, Missouri riots set the model for Marxists to organize street chaos by the Left. They have since been followed by the emergence of Antifa, the New Black Panthers, and Black Lives Matter. Other kooks inspired by the Leftist revolutionary cause have assassinated police officers and used other violence to express their own societal hate.
If we fail to maintain vigilance to preserve our Judeo-Christian values and republican foundations, to preserve ethics of individual freedom and responsibility, and our right to earn profit and to skillfully employ our own capital wealth under fair rule by law, then these invasive ideological cancers will replace them.
It is critical that we expose these ideology movements as a dual menace. Otherwise, self-appointed terror agents of the control collectives will become more destructive in our society. Through pressure, force and terror, Islamic jihadis and collectivist Marxists will try to make us desire security above liberty, and to turn to them for control.

PENNSYLVANIA: MUSLIM LAWMAKER SAYS PRAYER IN THE NAME OF JESUS "REPRESENTED ISLAMOPHOBIA"

They Want to BAN Jesus From the Capitol
MUSLIM OFFENDED BY CHRISTIAN PRAYER IN HARRISBURG, PA
THE PRAYER:
PENNSYLVANIA: MUSLIM LAWMAKER SAYS PRAYER IN THE NAME OF JESUS "REPRESENTED ISLAMOPHOBIA" 
BY ROBERT SPENCER
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Rep. Stephanie Borowicz’s prayer may have been inappropriate in a setting in which not everyone present was Christian. We have, however, seen many imams say prayers at various legislative bodies that are not non-sectarian, but manifestly Islamic and even condemning of Jews and Christians, while the non-Muslim lawmakers stand with oblivious heads bowed. But “Islamophobic”? This illustrates how absurd charges of “Islamophobia” are, and how any manifestation of faith other than Islam is sometimes seen as offensive to Muslims, as we saw in Uganda in December. All these Democrats who are proclaiming their Christian faith but deploring Rep. Borowicz’s prayer should thus calm Movita Johnson-Harrell’s rage by converting to Islam and thus removing the source of her feelings of offense.
“Muslim Lawmaker Says Prayer in Name of Jesus is Islamophobic,” Todd Starnes, March 26, 2019:
Pennsylvania’s first female Muslim lawmaker in the General Assembly accused a Republican colleague of Islamophobia after she opened a legislative session with a prayer that invoked the name of Jesus Christ.
“Jesus, you are our only hope,” Rep. Stephanie Borowicz prayed. “At the name of Jesus, every knee will bow and every tongue will confess Jesus, that you are Lord.”
Movita Johnson-Harrell, who was sworn into office after the prayer, said the prayer was “highly offensive to me, my guests, and other members of the House.”
Borowicz delivered the prayer shortly before Movita Johnson-Harrell — the first Muslim woman elected to the General Assembly — was sworn in.
“It blatantly represented the Islamophobia that exists among some leaders — leaders that are supposed to represent the people,” Johnson-Harrell said in a statement published by the Pennsylvania Capital Star. “I came to the Capitol to help build bipartisanship and collaborations regardless of race or religion to enhance the quality of life for everyone in the Commonwealth.”
A number of Democrats, including House Minority Whip Jordan Harris, accused the freshman lawmaker of weaponizing her religion to “intimidate, demean and degrade” Johnson-Harrell.
“Let me be clear. I am a Christian. I spend my Sunday mornings in church worshiping and being thankful for all that I have,” Harris told PennLive.com. “But in no way does that mean I would flaunt my religion at those who worship differently than I do. There is no room in our Capitol building for actions such as this, and it’s incredibly disappointing that today’s opening prayer was so divisive.”
So this is the prayer that the Democrats considered to be demeaning, degrading and Islamophobic:
“Jesus, I thank you for this privilege Lord of letting me pray God. That, I, Jesus am your ambassador today. Standing here representing you – the King of Kings, the Lord of Lords, the Great I Am, the One who is coming back again, the one who came, died and rose again on the third day. I’m so privileged to stand here today. So thank you for this honor, Jesus.
“God, for those that came before us like George Washington in Valley Forge and Abraham Lincoln who sought after you in Gettysburg and the Founding Fathers in Independence Hall – Jesus – that sought after you and fasted and prayed for this nation to be founded on your principles and your words and your truths.
“God forgive us. Jesus we’ve lost sight of you. We’ve forgotten you, God, in our country. And we are asking you to forgive us, Jesus. Your promise in your word says if my people who are called by name will humble themselves and pray and seek your face and turn from their wicked ways that you’ll heal our land. Jesus, you are our only hope.
“God , I pray for our leaders – Speaker Turzi, Leader Culter, Governor Wolf, President Trump. Lord, thank you that he stands beside Israel unequivocally Lord. Thank you that – Jesus – that we are blessed because we stand by Israel and we ask for the peace of Jerusalem as your word says God.
“We ask that we not be overcome by evil and that we overcome evil with good in this land once again. I claim all these things in the powerful, mighty name of Jesus, at the name of Jesus every knee will bow and every tongue will confess that you Jesus are lord. In Jesus name Amen.”
In other words, Borowicz prayed the way the Bible commands us to pray for the peace of Jerusalem, for our elected leaders and in the name of Jesus.
But Pennsylvania Democrats were clearly triggered by the name of the King of Kings and Lord of Lords.
Democrat Rep. Margo Davidson shouted “objection” near the end of the lawmaker’s prayer….
_____________________________________________________________ SEE ALSO: https://conservativepost.com/they-want-to-ban-jesus-from-the-capitol/  EXCERPT: House Minority Whip Jordan Harris, who insisted that he is a devout Christian, went so far as to suggest that “there is no room in our Capitol building” for so explicitly thanking and dedicating oneself to Jesus.

AND:
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2019/03/pennsylvania-state-dems-call-christian-prayer-bigoted-applaud-quran-reading-at-state-house-session
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2019/04/pennsylvania-muslim-lawmaker-says-christian-prayer-was-meant-to-intentionally-harm-her

CANADA REJECTS ISRAEL'S NEEDS TO DEFEND ITSELF; DOES NOT RECOGNIZE ITS CONTROL OVER GOLAN HEIGHTS

CANADA REJECTS ISRAEL'S NEEDS TO DEFEND ITSELF; DOES NOT RECOGNIZE ITS CONTROL 
OVER GOLAN HEIGHTS 
BY CHRISTINE DOUGLASS-WILLIAMS
SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2019/03/canada-rejects-israels-needs-to-defend-itself-does-not-recognize-its-control-over-golan-heightsrepublished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on his visit to the White House witnessed President Trump sign a proclamation that the U.S. officially recognizes the Golan Heights as Israeli territory.
Israel captured the Golan Heights from Syria in the 1967 Six-Day War and annexed it in 1981. This was no different from the situation of many lands that were conquered in war. Israel must keep control over the Golan Heights for its survival.
As President Trump stated:
After 52 years it is time for the United States to fully recognize Israel’s Sovereignty over the Golan Heights, which is of critical strategic and security importance to the State of Israel and Regional Stability.
The Golan Heights is Syria’s “only land border with Israel” and has “occasionally been struck by missiles and other forms of fire from Syria in recent years, with Israel retaliating against Syrian and Iranian targets.” Ongoing threats from Syria, Iran and its proxy Hizballah also make it urgent that Israel maintains control over the Golan Heights.
Yet despite these facts, Canada issued a statement that it “does not recognize permanent Israeli control over the Golan Heights,” thus siding with the anti-Israel U.N. and abandoning Israel. In so doing, it is tacitly supporting jihadi interests while hiding behind its self-proclaimed adherence to “international law” as its justification for doing so.
In trying to appease supporters of Israel, Global Affairs added that Canada remains “a steadfast friend” of Israel, saying: “We stand with Israel and support Israel’s right to live in peace and security with its neighbors.” These words give the illusion of support, but standing with Israel means supporting it in its ability to defend itself from obliteration.
Government of Canada, “Statement on the Golan Heights,” Global Affairs Canada, March 25, 2019:
“In accordance with international law, Canada does not recognize permanent Israeli control over the Golan Heights. Canada’s long-standing position remains unchanged.
“Annexation of territory by force is prohibited under international law. Any declaration of a unilateral border change goes against the foundation of the rules-based international order.
“Canada is a steadfast friend of Israel. We stand with Israel and support Israel’s right to live in peace and security with its neighbours.”
______________________________________________________________
SEE ALSO:

TRUMP’S RECOGNITION OF ISRAELI SOVEREIGNTY 

OVER GOLAN HEIGHTS

TURKEY: ERDOGAN CLAIMS EUROPEAN POLITICIANS OPPOSED TO CONVERSION OF HAGIA SOPHIA TO A MOSQUE ARE "ENEMIES OF ISLAM"

TURKEY: ERDOGAN CLAIMS EUROPEAN POLITICIANS OPPOSED TO CONVERSION OF HAGIA SOPHIA TO A MOSQUE ARE "ENEMIES OF ISLAM" 
BY ROBERT SPENCER
 republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
This paints a large target on their backs, and may ensure, since they are clueless and cowardly dhimmis, that they will fall into line with Erdogan’s plans.
“ErdoÄŸan calls some EU politicians ‘enemies of Islam,’” SCF, March 25, 2019:
Turkish President Recep Tayyip ErdoÄŸan has accused EU politicians Kati Piri, Federica Mogherini and Johannes Hahn of being enemies of Islam while criticizing a recent report adopted by the EU in favor of the official freeze of the membership process with Turkey, according to Turkish media reports on Friday.
During a recent interview on the pro-government Ülke TV, Erdoğan was asked about remarks by Piri, the Turkey rapporteur for the European Parliament (EP), against the conversion of the Hagia Sophia in İstanbul into a mosque.
In response, he said: “There is no need to talk about that woman in the EP, anyway. Let’s not spread her propaganda. … They advise [the EU] to stop accession talks with us. I wish they had done such a thing and stopped the accession talks. Our foreign minister made the necessary explanations at the meeting there to [EU foreign affairs chief] Mogherini, then to that woman [Piri] and to the Austrian [Hahn], to all of them. But they are not honest, they are not sincere. We should not forget this: We are Muslims and they are enemies of Islam.”…
_____________________________________________________________
SEE ALSO:
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2019/03/erdogan-hagia-sophia-will-be-made-a-mosque-in-retaliation-for-us-declaring-golan-to-be-a-part-of-israel 

THE FALSE "GOSPEL" THAT DISGUISES CLASH OF CIVILIZATIONS AS RACIAL HARMONY

THE FALSE "GOSPEL" THAT DISGUISES CLASH OF CIVILIZATIONS AS RACIAL HARMONY 
BY DR. DIXON & JEFF MAPLES
SEE: http://the-trumpet-online.com/false-gospel-disguises-clash-civilizations-racial-harmony/republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
March 21st, 2019
There is a deep-rooted heresy that is gaining momentum in the Evangelical church today. The heresy is born out of Black Liberation Theology — a theology popularized by James Cone that encourages blacks to use their religion to seek “liberation” from various forms of political, economic, and social oppression. This sinister theology actually disguises the gospel with a false gospel of works and self-atonement for generational sins. Two of its most prominent adherents in mainstream Evangelicalism today are Thabiti Anyabwile and Anthony Bradley.

Slave Reparations a Key Tenet Liberation Theology Movement

Slave Reparations is one of the key tenets of this movement. Oddly enough, it has gained a lot of traction, not just from blacks, but from many of the progressive white Evangelicals through liberal outlets such as The Gospel Coalition. Proponents of this movement strongly believe that blacks in America today suffer economically and socially because of slavery. I should note that it is not far-fetched to cede that historically, blacks in America have been mistreated. But where the serious error in their theology occurs is at the point they lay the guilt and the blame not just on an entire ethnic group — white people — but the multi-generational descendants of white people.
Thabiti Anyabwile recently posted a Twitter thread where he actually stated that by implementing a system of reparations in America, white people can be freed from their guilt.

Liberation Movement Built on False Premise

The Liberation Theology movement is built on the premise that man is basically good and deserves good. It is actually a subtle form of the prosperity gospel. Proponents of this movement believe that they deserve equality, not of just opportunity, but of outcome in the economic and social spectrum. This is antithetical to the gospel of Jesus Christ. The true gospel actually teaches that no one is good and all deserve Hell (Romans 3:10-12). As stated above, the proponents of this movement teach that reparations are a necessary component of forgiveness and freedom from guilt.
Anyabwile, Bradley, and so many others have repeatedly tried to make the case that not only are blacks suffering today, but they are suffering because of continued oppression at the hands of white people. What they fail to understand, however, is that biblical suffering and biblical poverty are completely different than most anything that can be compared to in America today. In fact, homeless people living in the streets of America’s cities have it much better than the poor and suffering described in the Scriptures — and even around the world today. If Bradley and Anyabwile were honest, they would acknowledge this fact. But it doesn’t fit into their theology.

Liberation Theology Encourages Unforgiveness and Self-Entitlement

One of the key tenets of the true gospel of Jesus Christ is to die to yourself and live for Christ. You no longer belong to the world, you no longer seek the things of the world, but you built your treasures in Heaven (Matthew 6:19-21). But the gospel of reparations and generational guilt by proponents like Anaybwile and Bradley encourage people to harbor enmity with others — especially those they perceive as having wronged them in some way.
They teach unequivocally that all white people — by the very virtue of having white skin — are guilty of the sins of white slave-owners in the past. They have relentlessly pushed this narrative. They also teach that by the very virtue of being white, one is “privileged” in our society and unless one opposes this privilege, one is guilty.
Does racism exist? Yes. There is no denying that. It does exist on both sides, but nobody denies that historically, blacks have been the victims of racism in America. That is not the argument. The argument they make, however, is that because one is white, one benefits from the racism of others, both past, and present, and is, therefore, guilty by proxy, regardless of personal involvement.
This, of course, is heresy. It is nowhere taught in the New Testament that one is guilty of another person’s sins simply because they may or may not have indirectly benefited from it at some point. The New Testament teachings of Christ are clear that the guilt of sin lays in the hands of the sinner. We’re all guilty of enough sins to separate us eternally from Christ, we really don’t need the added weight of sins we did not commit.
This idea serves only to create division between people — that unless a white person accepts responsibility for a sin he did not commit, and make restitution for it, there can be no reconciliation. And if you don’t know what the Scriptures say about people who cause divisions, see Romans 16:17.

Reparations Theology Teaches a False Atonement

As stated above, the proponents of this movement teach that reparations are a necessary component of forgiveness and freedom from guilt. Jemar Tisby, another major player in this movement, Jemar Tisby, said “Christians who genuinely want to atone for any personal acts of racism must focus on dismantling racial inequality as it persists across systems and society,” and also suggested that white people could participate in reparations not only by “writing checks to random black people,” but also by supporting his ministry.
The Bible does teach that we should make restitution to people that we have wronged in some way. But the Bible does not teach that generational descendants are responsible for making restitution to other generational descendants of the person wronged.
I make no qualms about my position. These men are introducing a completely new gospel to the Evangelical church, and sadly, many have bought into it. If these men are truly concerned about racial reconciliation — which all Christians should be — they should be focusing on the cross of Jesus Christ, forgiveness of sins, and stop causing division in the body by shooting blame at an ethnic group for sins they have not committed.
by Jeff Maples
(Publisher’s Comment: Our Lord Jesus said: “Many false prophets shall arise and deceive many [Mt 24:11}.  Paul said, ” But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed. Ga 1:9 As we said before, so say I now again, If any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed. {Ga :8,9}
Websites Links



Tuesday, March 26, 2019

TRUMP STOPS TAXPAYER-BACKED MORTGAGES FOR ILLEGAL ALIENS

TRUMP STOPS TAXPAYER-BACKED MORTGAGES 
FOR ILLEGAL ALIENS

How Democrats are taking the economy hostage 

to protect illegal aliens

BY DANIEL GREENFIELD
SEE: https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/273245/trump-stops-taxpayer-backed-mortgages-illegal-daniel-greenfieldrepublished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, is an investigative journalist and writer focusing on the radical Left and Islamic terrorism
When Barack Obama implemented his unilateral amnesty for illegal aliens who claimed to have entered this country before the age of sixteen, the illegally amnestied illegals qualified for many benefits.
One of these were FHA loans.
FHA loans are government-backed mortgages meant for poorer Americans unable to qualify for normal mortgages. Democrat abuse of the FHA helped lead to the Great Recession and in the years afterward, FHA insured loans hit losses of $70 billion. By 2012, the FHA was $16 billion in the hole and had to be bailed out. The delinquency rate for FHA loans is still more than three times higher than normal loans, and depending on the period, have hovered between 8% and 14%. Time to bring in the illegal aliens.
When Obama illegally implemented DACA, a program exempting certain illegal aliens from government action, they were also allowed to apply for FHA loans. How many illegal aliens obtained FHA loans?
In December, a letter from three Senate Democrats claimed that HUD barred “approximately 800,000 individuals approved for DACA from FHA-insured mortgage loans”. This refers to the total number of DACA illegal aliens and it’s unknown how many of them have obtained FHA loans in past years.
Ellie Mae’s millennial tracker estimated that the average size of an FHA loan to millennials is $186,454. Potential exposure to illegal alien mortgages could then climb as improbably high as $150 billion.
It’s unknown how many illegal aliens have taken out FHA loans, but some media stories have cited loan officers for whom illegal alien FHA loans represent a significant percentage of their business.
The Trump administration has applied the brakes to this avalanche of taxpayer-insured mortgages to illegal aliens. The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) had begun notifying lenders that the FHA was no longer in the illegal alien mortgage business. The reasons were common sense. DACA illegal aliens, or in media spin, DREAMERs, were not legal residents and weren’t being legalized.
Under Obama, FHA rules had been bent so far backward that people who were not only non-citizens, not only non-permanent residents, but weren’t even legally here, were having taxpayers guarantee their mortgages. Not only hadn’t the Democrats learned anything from the Great Recession, they were determined to make the irresponsible behavior of the FHA a decade ago seem sober and sensible.
And they aren’t giving up.
The December letter by Senator Menendez, who had recently been on trial for corruption charges, Senator Booker, on whose watch the $100 million poured into Newark public schools dissipated, and Senator Cortez-Mastro, who had been accused of taking dirty money, claimed to be, “appalled that the Trump Administration would exploit a federal government program to deny Dreamers an opportunity of owning their own home.” But it was the Democrats who had exploited a federal government program meant for poor Americans to benefit not only foreigners, but illegal aliens with no right to be here.
The letter by the three Senator Democrats falsely claimed that President Trump was targeting a “portion of the American public”, when in fact illegal aliens are not part of the American public. They demanded, “sound and unambiguous legal reasoning” for the move. The sound and unambiguous reasoning would be that illegal aliens are not legally resident in the United States and therefore do not qualify for loans.
Much of the furor over FHA loans for illegal aliens was stirred up by Dani Hernandez, an underwriter for NewCastle Home Loans. NewCastle in Chicago markets aggressively to DACA illegal aliens, declaring, “Don’t let the political climate worry you. DACA recipients are eligible to buy a home.” It also assures the illegal aliens that they can qualify for FHA loans and it “specializes in working with DACA recipients.”
Prospective FHA borrowers are also informed that they can get a loan with a credit score as low as 500 and a 50% debt-to-income ratio.
The illegal alien mortgage business, built on the backs of American taxpayers, is obviously profitable. But it’s also a silent nuclear weapon threatening mass destruction of the economy in case of deportations.
The more illegal aliens end up with FHA loans, and as those FHA loans are turned into Ginnie Mae Mortgage Backed Securities, deporting DACA illegal aliens would risk mass defaults on FHA loans which are backed by American taxpayers. Quite a few Ginnie Mae bonds are being held by Japan and China.
That’s why HUD’s move of stopping the flow of FHA loans to illegal aliens is so vital and important.
Not only do FHA loans endanger our economic security, they also endanger our national security. Their very existence serves as political leverage to prevent the government from enforcing the law. Every illegal alien mortgage not only robs American taxpayers, but puts them at risk of even worse losses.
And considering the role of mortgage-backed securities in the Great Recession, the threat is real.
However, HUD has carefully avoided taking a clear position to prevent the inevitable lawsuits and overrides by Obama and Clinton judges embedded in the federal judiciary. Instead, HUD officials have successfully warned off many lenders by creating ambiguity about the status of DACA FHA loans.
The riskier illegal alien FHA loans appear, the more irresponsible taking them on will seem. And lenders will be aware of the shadow of the “False Claims Act” hanging overhead if they bite on illegal loans.
This is far from an ideal solution. But it’s an understandable response by a crippled executive branch that has had its legal powers stripped from it by Democrat activists operating under the guise of judges.
But taxpayer-backed mortgages for illegal aliens are only the tip of the tottering FHA iceberg that President Trump needs to begin shutting down to avoid another recession caused by bad loans.
FHA loans to non-citizens are also extended to non-permanent residents and even to “refugees”. The Office of Refugee Resettlement had even been promoting Freddie Mac’s Islamic Sharia-compliant mortgages for Muslim “refugees”. Foreigners here under Temporary Protected Status, a category that the Trump administration has begun winding down, are also potentially eligible for FHA loans.
The FHA is deeply dangerous and troubled. It is in desperate need of reform.
American taxpayers have long been exploited by the FHA as a piggy bank to pay off Democrat voters. But DACA FHA loans have taken this a step further by taking the economy hostage for illegal aliens.
The FHA loan was created to serve Americans. If it is to continue to exist, it should only serve Americans.
There has never been any reason given why the United States government should be extending its credit on behalf of foreigners, whether they are residents, temporary workers or, let alone, illegal aliens.
The risk of such loans has been rolled into the overall risk for Americans. And the buck was passed.
The artificial stimulation of the housing market isn’t reason enough for the government to be putting the economy at risk and taxpayers on the hook for the illegal aliens whom Democrats hope to turn into voters. DACA was an illegal policy. FHA loans for DACA recipients piles illegality on illegality.
American taxpayers should be let off the hook for illegal alien mortgages before the cost grows too high.
____________________________________________________________
SEE ALSO:
https://www.frontpagemag.com/point/273282/fannie-mae-backs-mortgages-illegal-aliens-daniel-greenfield

UK HOME OFFICE REJECTS ASYLUM BID OF SECOND IRANIAN CHRISTIAN: "JESUS COULD NOT PROTECT HIM FROM THE IRANIAN REGIME"

UK HOME OFFICE REJECTS ASYLUM BID OF SECOND IRANIAN CHRISTIAN: "JESUS COULD NOT PROTECT HIM  FROM THE IRANIAN REGIME" 
BY ROBERT SPENCER
SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2019/03/uk-home-office-rejects-asylum-bid-of-second-iranian-christian-jesus-could-not-protect-him-from-the-iranian-regime;  republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
There appears to be a very deep hostility to Christianity among certain officials of the UK Home Office. What might be their background and perspective? They may be Muslims, of course, but they may also be Leftists who despite their own nation and heritage and wouldn’t ever dare say the slightest critical word about Islam.
“‘Your faith is half-hearted’: Second Iranian Christian had his asylum application rejected by the Home Office after saying ‘Jesus could not protect him from the Iranian regime’, lawyer claims,” by Rory Tingle, Mailonline, March 24, 2019:
The Home Office is facing more questions about its attitude towards Christian asylum seekers amid claims it rejected another Iranian man’s application to move to Britain by telling him, ‘your belief in Jesus is half-hearted’.
There was outrage this week after it emerged a convert was refused asylum in 2016 because an official said his conversion from Islam was ‘inconsistent’ with his suggestion Christianity was a peaceful religion – by highlighting violent passages from the Bible.
Now immigration caseworker Nathan Stevens, who exposed the first case, has said another Iranian he worked with had his application rejected after an official criticised him for admitting Jesus could not protect him from his country’s tyrannical regime.
Mr Stevens posted a comment from the refusal on Twitter, which read: ‘You affirmed in your AIR [Asylum Interview Record] that Jesus is your saviour, but then claimed that He would not be able to save you from the Iranian regime. It is therefore considered that you have no conviction in your faith and your belief in Jesus is half-hearted.’…

CALIFORNIA: HUNDREDS OF PROTESTERS RALLY AGAINST REP. ILHAN OMAR AT HAMAS LINKED "CAIR" FUNDRAISER

MUSLIMS ARE "VIOLATING HUMAN RIGHTS" WORLDWIDE; 
NOT THE JEWISH PEOPLE
ISLAM IS NOT A RELIGION OF PEACE
CALIFORNIA: HUNDREDS OF PROTESTERS RALLY AGAINST REP. ILHAN OMAR AT HAMAS LINKED 
"CAIR" FUNDRAISER
BY ROBERT SPENCER
SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2019/03/california-hundreds-of-protestors-rally-against-rep-ilhan-omar-at-hamas-linked-cair-fundraiser;  republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Rejecting Islamic anti-Semitism and its normalization. This is good to see. Omar ought to be under fire for appearing for Hamas-linked CAIR. CAIR is an unindicted co-conspirator in a Hamas terror funding case — so named by the Justice Department. CAIR officials have repeatedly refused to denounce Hamas and Hizballah as terrorist groups. Several former CAIR officials have been convicted of various crimes related to jihad terror. CAIR’s co-founder and longtime Board chairman (Omar Ahmad), as well as its chief spokesman (Ibrahim Hooper), have made Islamic supremacist statements about how Islamic law should be imposed in the U.S. (Ahmad denies this, but the original reporter stands by her story.) CAIR chapters frequently distribute pamphlets telling Muslims not to cooperate with law enforcement. CAIR has opposed virtually every anti-terror measure that has been proposed or implemented and has been declared a terror organization by the United Arab Emirates. CAIR’s Hussam Ayloush in 2017 called for the overthrow of the U.S. government. CAIR’s national outreach manager is an open supporter of Hamas. But the Democrats wouldn’t dream of challenging her over this.
“Protesters in Woodland Hills Rally Outside Event Featuring Rep. Ilhan Omar,” Associated Press, March 23, 2019:
Hundreds of protesters rallied outside an event where a congresswoman spoke to a Muslim-American civil rights group.
The demonstrators were protesting the presence Saturday of U.S. Rep. Ilhan Omar of Minnesota at the fundraising event for the Council of American-Islamic Relations of Greater Los Angeles….
The Los Angeles Daily News reports that the protesters lined a sidewalk area outside the Hilton hotel in Woodland Hills, waving Israeli flags. A smaller group of counter-protesters held up signs in support of Omar.

INSANITY IN THE CLASSROOM

INSANITY IN THE CLASSROOM
BY TNA VIDEO
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Today’s public school children are being fed massive doses of propaganda and indoctrination without the consent of the parents. Children today have very little knowledge of individual liberty and personal responsibility, both of which are crucial in a free society. The New American’s special report, “Rescuing Our Children” exposes all of this and how Americans must address this issue head on before it’s too late!
EDUCATE19 for free shipping & handling! (limit 1 issue)