NEW PATENTS: GOOGLE WANTS TO MONITOR EVERYTHING YOU & YOUR CHILDREN DO AT HOME 
BY C. MITCHELL SHAW
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Promoting the new devices as a matter of convenience, as it has done with the Google Home speaker, the tech giant seems to expect that users will readily accept even more (and more detailed) surveillance for the promise of greater ease and convenience. The unevenness of that trade-off (something as precious as privacy for something as unimportant as convenience) is why this writer refers to such technology as “surveillance as a feature.”
While Google may have started out as a search engine and is still largely associated with that aspect of its business model, the reality is that Google’s main business (to which the search engine aspect is completely subservient) is data-mining and data analysis. Consider that the tech titan has amassed a net value of roughly $200 billion by offering “free” services, such as search, e-mail, calendar, and address book, along with YouTube and other services. That $200 billion has largely been made by gathering troves of personal data on its more than one billion users and leveraging that data into advertising revenues. The company also routinely filters and manipulates search results for the benefit of political candidates and policies favored by the company’s leaders.
These patents tell us that Google is 
developing smart-home products that are capable of eavesdropping on us 
throughout our home in order to learn more about us and better target us
 with advertising. It goes much further than the current Google Home 
speaker that’s promoted to answer our questions and provide useful 
information, and the Google-owned Nest thermostat that measures 
environmental conditions in our home. What the patents describe are 
sensors and cameras mounted in every room to follow us and analyze what 
we’re doing throughout our home.
They describe how the cameras can even 
recognize the image of a movie star’s image on a resident’s t-shirt, 
connect it to the person’s browsing history, and send the person an ad 
for a new movie the star is in.
That degree of surveillance is far beyond anything found in the current state of “surveillance as a feature.”As an indication of the thinking of the folks over at Google, the description for one of the patents begins by lamenting the lack of ability to use current “smart-devices” to accomplish the level of surveillance the company desires. The patent is explained in 258 paragraphs. Paragraph [0003] and [0004] state:
People interact with a number of 
different electronic devices on a daily basis. In a home setting, for 
example, a person may interact with smart thermostats, lighting systems,
 alarm systems, systems, and a variety of other electronic devices. 
Unfortunately, the usefulness of these devices often times is limited to
 basic and/or particular pre-determined tasks associated with the 
device.
As society advances, households within 
the society may become increasingly diverse, having varied household 
norms, procedures, and rules. Unfortunately, because so-called smart 
devices have traditionally been designed with pre-determined tasks 
and/or functionalities, comparatively fewer advances have been made 
regarding using these devices in diverse or evolving households or in 
the context of diverse or evolving household norms, procedures, and 
rules.
And paragraph [0006] says:
According to embodiments of this 
disclosure, a smart-home environment may be provided with smart-device 
environment policies that use smart-devices to monitor activities within
 a smart-device environment, report on these activities, and/or provide 
smart-device control based upon these activities.
So, the current state of “so-called smart devices” isn’t up to 
Google’s standard? Apparently, the only devices that qualify as “smart” 
to Google are those that allow the company to analyze your every 
conversation and movement throughout your home. To drive that home, 
paragraph [0072] spells out just how two of the processors in the device
 described by this patent would work together to accomplish the type of 
surveillance that meets Google’s standard for “smart devices.” It 
states:
By way of example, the high-power 
processor 20 and the low-power processor 22 may detect when a location 
(e.g., a house or room) is occupied (i.e., includes a presence of a 
human), up to and including whether it is occupied by a specific person 
or is occupied by a specific number of people (e.g., relative to one or 
more thresholds). In one embodiment, this detection can occur, e.g., by 
analyzing microphone signals, detecting user movements (e.g., in front 
of a device), detecting openings and closings of doors or garage doors, 
detecting wireless signals, detecting an internet protocol (IP) address 
of a received signal, detecting operation of one or more devices within a
 time window, or the like. Moreover, the high-power processor 20 and the
 low-power processor 22 may include image recognition technology to 
identify particular occupants or objects.
Paragraph [0125] explains how the devices would distinguish between 
voices to determine, for instance, that a room is occupied by an adult 
male, an adult female, or a female child based on the audio signatures 
of the voices. It goes on to state, “Video data may optionally be used 
to confirm or to help arrive at such conclusions.” And paragraph [0131] 
explains how the devices can use “facial recognition or other 
image-based recognition” along with “digital device presence (e.g., 
presence of electronic devices associated with a particular person), or 
other inputs ... associated with a particular household occupant or 
particular type of household occupant” to identify people.Perhaps one of the most disturbing elements is found is paragraph [0185]. It describes the presence of sensors, cameras, and microphones in bathrooms to determine whether a person is brushing his teeth— based on “an audio signature and/or video signature” to measure such things as “the sounds and/or images of teeth brushing” and the sound of the sink being left on for the time it takes a person to brush their teeth.
Let that sink in for just a moment: sensors, cameras, and microphones in your bathroom? Remember that paragraph [0125] already discussed the fact that the devices can detect the presence of children. This means that the folks over at Google are already aware that there are children in the world. Those children take baths and showers. Google wants you to point a camera and a microphone at your children while they bathe?
And that is far from the only access to your children sought by Google. Another patent filed by Google discusses the tech company’s plans to monitor children as a type of digital nanny. As The Atlantic reported:
The second patent proposes a smart-home 
system that would help run the household, using sensors and cameras to 
restrict kids’ behavior. Parents could program a device to note if it 
overhears “foul language” from children, scan internet usage for mature 
or objectionable content, or use “occupancy sensors” to determine if 
certain areas of the house are accessed while they’re gone— for example,
 the liquor cabinet. The system could be set to “change a smart lighting
 system color to red and flash the lights” as a warning to children or 
even power off lights and devices if they’re grounded.
As bad as all of this is, Google makes sure to leave the door open 
for more. Early on, paragraph [0005] of the first patent states:
A summary of certain embodiments 
disclosed herein is set forth below. It should be understood that these 
aspects are presented merely to provide the reader with a brief summary 
of these certain embodiments and that these aspects are not intended to 
limit the scope of this disclosure. Indeed, this disclosure may 
encompass a variety of aspects that may not be set forth below.
So, Google — already pushing surveillance into new areas — reserves 
the “right” under this patent to push even further as new surveillance 
ideas enter the darkened minds of the leaders of the company whose motto
 was once, “Don’t be evil!”