Translate

Thursday, September 26, 2019

THE ORWELLIAN UNIVERSE OF LINDA SARSOUR, MUSLIM JIHADIST, ANTI-SEMITE, LIBERAL GLOBALIST

THE ORWELLIAN UNIVERSE OF LINDA SARSOUR
BY STEVEN EMERSON
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
This article also was published Sept. 19 by the American Thinker.
A wide-ranging set of comments by Linda Sarsour – the newly designated official surrogate for presidential candidate Bernie Sanders – reveals the full extent of the Orwellian world in which she lives. Her views are even more shocking than what we already know about her pathological fabrication of history, her abject anti-Semitism, her fanatical hatred of the Jewish state, and her growing leadership role in the Democratic Party.
"This sentiment of ending occupation in Palestine, of supporting Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions (BDS), or at least at the minimum, the right for people to engage in Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions, the idea that being a staunch critic of the state of Israel does not equal being anti-Semitic. This is just mainstream now," Sarsour said in a rare February interview with Jacobin magazine's podcast, "The Dig."
Since Sarsour claimed to divine what constitutes "mainstream," the U.S. House of Representatives passed a resolution condemning the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement targeting Israel by a 398-17 vote.
BDS is the campaign to coerce corporations and universities into boycotting or divesting investments in Israel, with the goal of eliminating the State of Israel. A one-state solution that Sarsour advocates would accomplish just that, ending up with the destruction of Israel.
The lopsided House vote includes support from 93 percent of House Democrats. BDS, the resolution says, makes peace more difficult to achieve because it gives Palestinians hope that international pressure, not negotiations, is the best path to achieving their goals.
It specifically acknowledged that "the Global BDS Movement does not recognize, and many of its supporters explicitly deny, the right of the Jewish people to national self-determination." That rejection meets the U.S. State Department's definition of anti-Semitism.
Meanwhile, a resolution filed by Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., defending BDS by placing it in line with the American Civil Rights Movement and argued it was similar to the boycott of apartheid South Africa and Nazi Germany.
During the interview, Sarsour reiterated her support for a supposed "binational" state for Israelis and Palestinians. But even the interviewer, Daniel Denvir, who supports this view, acknowledged that "it does presume that Israel as a Jewish state will no longer exist." Yet Sarsour denies this, falsely claiming that Palestinians – despite the pre-1948 Palestinian pogroms against Jews, the Arab wars dedicated to annihilating Israel, and nearly daily terrorist attacks that have killed thousands of Jews – have always wanted to live in peace with Israel.
"The Democratic Party has to make a choice," she said, "like whose side are you on here?"
This question is indicative of Linda Sarsour's vendetta against people who disagree with her black-and-white worldview. As co-chair of the Women's March, Sarsour used her platform to declare that one cannot be both a Zionist and a feminist.
This past week, Sarsour and two other radicals were dropped from the board. Yet, Sarsour – in what appears was a one for one substitution – was replaced by an official of the Hamas front group CAIR, Zahra Billoo, who has repeatedly called for the destruction of the Jewish state, not to mention denouncing U.S. counterterrorism policies as similar to Nazism. The Women's March dropped Billoo days later after intense criticism.
Yet during the Dig interview, Sarsour praised leaders within the women's rights movement who are "not just preaching intersectionality, but in fact [are] implementing it in the larger movements we're a part of." For Sarsour, intersectionality means bridging diverse agendas – as long as supporters of Israel are left out. "Palestinian rights are at the table because they're part of a larger progressive agenda," Sarsour declared. Israeli rights are not.
There is no room for nuance among U.S.-based Islamists. In an ISNA speech last year, Sansour promoted a modern-day blood-libel by claiming that Jews were behind police shootings of unarmed blacks. But despite Sarsour's radical and anti-Semitic statements, the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR), an unindicted co-conspirator in the largest Hamas money laundering case in U.S. history (and described by an FBI agent as a front group for Hamas, continues to promote her at high-profile events.
This "othering" dimension to Islamist-speak is only fueling sectarian discord in the United States.
It is ironic to hear Sarsour purport to denounce anti-Semitic preacher Minister Louis Farrakhan during the February interview, as someone whose statements "do not align with our unity principles at the Women's March." But these views did not prevent Sarsour from speaking at a 2015 event organized by Farrakhan, essentially legitimizing the anti-Semitic leader's conspiratorial and racist views. Sarsour deleted a 2015 Instagram post in which she gushed that Farrakhan "does not age, God bless him." She once called the Nation of Islam an "integral" part of the history of Islam.
As expected, Sarsour rails against Israel's military presence in the West Bank and its blockade of the Hamas-controlled Gaza Strip.
"This is an illegal military occupation being paid for by taxpayer dollars. We must be unequivocal when we stand against the murder, the assassinations, the sniping of peaceful protesters in Gaza."
Yet Sarsour provides zero nuance as to why Israel maintains military control over parts of Palestinian territories and its borders with Israel especially against Palestinian terrorist organizations who openly state their aim to destroy Israel.
The "sniping of peaceful protesters" is yet another disingenuous Islamist talking point embraced by mainstream U.S. media outlets. The vast majority of Palestinians killedduring violent protests are operatives of Hamas and other terrorist organizations. This has been repeatedly confirmed by senior Hamas leaders. For years, Hamas has orchestrated near-weekly violent riots, staged lethal attacks at the border, while encouraging Palestinians to infiltrate into Israel to attack civilians. Other rioters throw pipe bombs and IED's over the Gaza fence and deploy Molotov kites, sparking fires in Israeli fields near the border causing massive damage.
Meanwhile, Sarsour is silent when it comes to condemning Hamas or Fatah for the brutal suppression of Palestinian demonstrators within their borders who are routinely repressed and tortured by their governing authorities.
In Sarsour's world, "There has never been a person that I've come across in Palestine that has said to me, Linda, the only way for Palestinians to live in peace is to destroy the state of Israel. It never happened. No one has ever said that, because that's not what the Palestinian people want."
This assertion is not only misleading, it is categorically false, given overwhelming evidence that Palestinian society and organizations systematically incite violence against Israel and glorify Palestinian terrorists who kill Jews. Hamas, an organization that exists to bring about Israeli's annihilation, continues to rule Gaza and remains disturbingly popular.
Palestinians convicted of attacking Israelis receive massive stipends from the Palestinian Authority, totaling tens of millions of dollars. The amount paid to terrorists depends on the length of sentence or on the number of Jews killed, which has become a source of pride in Palestine. Peaceful coexistence with Israel is rejected as traitorous.
Sarsour repeatedly denied that representatives Rashida Tlaib and Ilhan Omar are anti-Semitic: "I know them both very personally and they get really hurt by these false accusations of anti-Semitism." Really? But both Tlaib and Omar have a record of making anti-Semitic statements, including peddling accusations of dual loyalties by American supporters of Israel.
"So when you are supporting an anti-BDS legislation, which is anti the Constitution of the United States of America, which you swore to uphold as a member of the US Senate, then Rashida has every right to question, who are you for?" Sarsour said. But this argument precisely feeds into anti-Semitic tropes of dual loyalty. For American Islamists, one cannot be a patriotic American while opposing sanctions against the Jewish state – one of the United States' most staunch allies.
Towards the end of the interview, Sarsour had the audacity to defend anti-Semitic politicians like British Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn. She absolved him of responsibility for rampant anti-Semitism he has encouraged within Labour since he assumed leadership. For years, Corbyn has praised Palestinian terrorists and supported the worst forms of anti-Semitism.
Sarsour still claims she is "committed to calling out anti-Semitism in the progressive left. And I've done it many times before."
No, Linda, you are the poster-woman of leftist anti-Semitism.

SHAHRAM HADIAN: CHRISLAM EXPOSED!

SHAHRAM HADIAN: CHRISLAM EXPOSED! 
In "Chrislam Exposed" Pastor Shahram Hadian exposes the seductive lie of a common God between Christianity and Islam. He shares his journey of becoming a Christian, exposes the false teachings of "Chrislam," and uncovers Chrislam’s growing and devastating implementation into our churches and missions both in America and oversees. Shahram speaks around the nation with a heart to awaken America, and especially the church. As a former Muslim, he is deeply grieved over Christian pastors and missional leaders promoting this false gospel in their effort to be culturally sensitive to Muslims. Despite Chrislam’s proponents, Christians and Muslims do not worship the same God. Shahram was born in Iran and came to America at the age of 7 to escape an oppressive Islamic regime. He is a proud US citizen. He experienced a transformational life change when he committed his life to Jesus Christ 14 years ago. He has served his local community as a pastor, police officer, teacher and coach and was a candidate for WA State Governor in 2012. "You cannot be a Muslim and a true follower of Jesus Christ. Chrislam not only endangers the hope of salvation for Muslims but threatens to lead many Christians astray from the truth of God's Word." - Shahram Hadian

Shahram Hadian on Islam part 1

Shahram Hadian on Islam part 2


MUST SEE-TRUTH IN LOVE CHURCH: "HOW THE SOCIAL JUSTICE WARRIORS ARE PERSECUTING TRUE CHRISTIANS"

MUST SEE:
TRUTH IN LOVE CHURCH: "HOW THE SOCIAL JUSTICE WARRIORS ARE PERSECUTING TRUE CHRISTIANS"
RESISTANCE FROM WITHIN & WITHOUT
SERMON BY SHAHRAM HADIAN, FORMER IRANIAN MUSLIM TURNED CHRISTIAN
https://www.tilproject.com/about-shahram

MATTEL LAUNCHES NEW LINE OF "GENDER NEUTRAL" DOLLS

WHEN GENITALS YOU'RE BORN WITH ARE IRRELEVANT?
BECAUSE YOUR CHILD IS A LITTLE GOD, HE/SHE/IT CAN CHANGE GENDERS AT A WHIM, 
& RECREATE THE WORLD?
KIM CULMONE OF MATTEL SPEAKS FOR KIDS WHO CAN'T EXPRESS THEIR "GENDER NEUTRAL" WISHES?
THAT IS, IF YOU BELIEVE HER FANTASY!
Since its debut in 1959, Barbie has grown to be the most lucrative franchise for toy manufacturer Mattel. Despite their popularity, critics say the dolls perpetuate an unhealthy body image and gender roles. But Mattel has been trying to reinvent Barbie. They now include more body types, skin colors, and hair textures. The company is also tackling gender stereotypes with its new line, which it hopes will boost sales too.
SOME PARENTS ARE THRILLED WITH THE GENDER QUEER, NON-BINARY MINDSET & LIFESTYLE, 
AND INTRODUCING IT TO THEIR KIDS:
MATTEL LAUNCHES NEW LINE OF 
"GENDER NEUTRAL" DOLLS 
BY PAUL JOSEPH WATSON
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Toy maker Mattel has announced it is launching a new line of “gender neutral” dolls, prompting some critics to accuse the company of trying to socially engineer children.
“Kids can customize the new dolls with long or short hair, pants or skirts, or both. The dolls come in six different skin tones,” reports Fox Business.
Kim Culmone, senior vice president of Mattel Fashion Doll Design, said the dolls were being released because “kids don’t want their toys dictated by gender norms.”
“Toys are a reflection of culture and as the world continues to celebrate the positive impact of inclusivity, we felt it was time to create a doll line free of labels,” she said.
An ad for the new product featured a boy with purple hair and one who was wearing an earring.
Some respondents accused the company of trying to socially engineer kids, contributing to making them confused about gender.
“This is all about social engineering,” commented Robbie Starbuck. “If @Mattel wanted to make a doll without defined private parts, totally fine, its been done many times and gives kids options. That’s not what’s going on here. This is social engineering masquerading as a toy.”
One wonders how successful the new line will be.
“Get woke, go broke” is a common refrain, but the amount of free advertising any company enjoys by pandering to identity politics is usually substantial.

UN "HUMAN RIGHTS" VS. GOD-GIVEN RIGHTS IN THE U.S.~BEHIND THE DEEP STATE~CHILEAN MICHELLE BACHELET, COMMUNIST TIED UN "HUMAN RIGHTS" CHIEF

UN "HUMAN RIGHTS" VS. GOD-GIVEN RIGHTS 
IN THE U.S.~BEHIND THE DEEP STATE
BY ALEX NEWMAN-TNA VIDEO
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Who or what defines human rights? In this episode of Behind the Deep State, host 
Alex Newman compares how human rights are defined within the United States vs. 
how they are defined with the UN “Human Rights” Council. Newman also highlights 
several contradictory and concerning elements to the council that should have 
people alarmed and outraged.

BACHELET, A FRIEND OF MADURO OF VENEZUELA

Statement by UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Michelle Bachelet

Global Summit on Religion, Peace and Security “Promoting the Non-Discrimination and Protection of Human Rights of Religious Minorities, Refugees and Migrants in Ultra-Nationalist Contexts”
A SOCIALIST-COMMUNIST ALL ALONG HER CAREER

UN “Human Rights” Chief Tied to Communist Network’s Corruption

BY ALEX NEWMAN
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
The top United Nations official dealing with “human rights,” Chilean socialist Michelle Bachelet, is embroiled in a massive Latin American corruption scandal involving a powerful international network of communists and crony tycoons. Among other charges, Bachelet was accused of accepting bribe money from a major company during her successful 2013 presidential campaign. The firm in question, meanwhile, was involved in looting taxpayers to finance communist revolution and socialist political candidates across the region. The implications are enormous. Despite her denials, calls for Bachelet to resign her UN post and face justice are growing louder.
The scandal threatening to engulf the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Bachelet, and even the UN itself, first came to light with the testimony of Leo Pinheiro, the ex-president of Brazilian civil engineering firm OAS. As part of a plea bargain with Brazilian prosecutors, Pinheiro, who was convicted of multiple crimes in 2015, revealed that he had funneled money into Bachelet’s presidential campaign. The money was transferred to the radical Chilean politician-turned UN bigwig on orders from then-Brazilian President Luiz Inácio “Lula” da Silva, Pinheiro revealed in his agreement, as first reported by a major Brazilian newspaper known as Folha de São Paulo.
That much has all been reported in the American media, albeit on the back pages of major newspapers. What has not been reported, though, is much more important to understanding the enormity of the scandal. Lula, who ordered that the bribe money be transferred to Bachelet, was one of the founders of the Latin American communist network known as the Foro de São Paulo (FSP, or São Paulo Forum in English). Other co-founders included mass-murdering dictator Fidel Castro, the Marxist narco-terror group known as the FARC in Colombia, and the mass-murdering Sandinistas in Nicaragua. The goal of the FSP, according to its own documents, is to build in Latin America what was lost in Eastern Europe — communist slavery.
The ex-Brazilian president at the center of it all is now in jail for his crimes as Brazil undergoes a counter-revolution. But he will not be the last to end up behind bars.
The Associated Press reported only that “Lula” was jailed as part of a “corruption case that stems from a nationwide investigation that has ensnared many of Brazil’s top businessmen and politicians.” But in reality, “corruption” to fund the lavish lifestyles of the communist elite, while problematic, was only the tip of the iceberg. Far more serious than the looting of taxpayers across Latin America is the fact that the stolen money was being used to spread communism and socialism across the region. Money from Colombian cocaine, Venezuelan oil, and Brazilian state-owned companies and corrupt contractors was being used by the FSP network to bankroll the political campaigns of totalitarians such as Bachelet — a Chilian politician and admirer of the mass-murdering Castro regime who literally defected to the communist slave state ruling East Germany.
After decades of playing defense, conservative forces in Latin America are finally finding their ground in combating the criminal conspiracy seeking to enslave their nations under communism. In his speech last week at the UN General Assembly, Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro, who is leading the fight against the communist conspirators in Brazil, blasted the network. “The São Paulo Forum [Foro de Sao Paulo], a criminal organization created in 1990 by Fidel Castro, Lula and Hugo Chávez to spread and implement socialism in Latin America, is still alive and has to be fought,” he explained, shining light on the dangerous organization that has thrived by remaining obscure and out of the spotlight.
As reported by The New American, the U.S. government has known all about the FSP for many years. But during the Obama administration, U.S. authorities were actively aiding and abetting multiple members of the subversive network. Establishment organizations such as the Council on Foreign Relations, meanwhile, maintained close ties with FSP members. Indeed, CFR Latin America chief Julia Sweig was even described by a U.S. counter-intelligence official as an “agent of influence” for the murderous Cuban dictatorship.
Now, thanks to the infamous “Lava Jato” (Car Wash) investigation in Brazil, however, the whole criminal network is being unraveled. Numerous senior officials and “businesmen” in Brazil and other Latin American nations have already been jailed for their role in the schemes. And now, Bachelet may be the next to go down as authorities in Chile and beyond investigate. Of course, Bachelet denies the charges, falsely telling Chile’s 24 Horas TV channel last week that she “never had any link with OAS or any other company.” Establishment media outlets around the world such as the Associated Press are working desperately to downplay the scandal and to minimize the enormous implications, too.
But the allegations are serious. So serious, in fact, that they have sparked calls by prominent lawmakers and officials in Bachelet’s native Chile for the controversial UN leader to return home to face justice. Leaders from the ruling party in Chile, known as “National Renewal,” for instance, said this was a “really serious situation.” “This same company has been recognized illegally financing politics in numerous countries,” said National Renewal’s Mario Desbordes, who argued that the negotiations for the illegal bribe money from Brazil “must have been carried out at the highest level of the campaign environment.”
Meanwhile, a member of the Chilean commission investigating the OAS role in all of this, Juan Antonio Coloma, warned that the company is known for its corruption and is “dedicated to financing left-wing candidates.” Another major company involved in the mushrooming scandal, Odebrecht, also has a long history of financing socialist and communist politicians and movements. The scheme went like this: The major government contractors formed an alliance, conspired with state-owned firms to fix prices on projects above what they would really cost, then the loot off the top would be recycled back to communist politicians, criminals, “businessmen,” and terrorists involved in the communist network.
Conservative presidential candidate Jose Antonio Kast, a longtime Chilean lawmaker, went even further than other Chilean leaders. To start with, he demanded that Bachelet leave her UN job (and the diplomatic immunity it provides) so she can answer to Chilean authorities. “If true, the $100 million OAS paid to Michelle Bachelet would be the biggest corruption scandal that affects a President of Chile in our history,” he said on Twitter. “We have the right and duty to investigate thoroughly. Bachelet has to answer.”
Kast, a popular conservative leader who may become Chile’s next president, said the UN “human rights” boss must come back to Chile promptly. “Michelle Bachelet must resign her position and come to face Chilean justice,” he said in a separate Twitter post. “If the truth is proven, she must be judged and pay for her crimes with jail time, just like all the other Latin American presidents who were bought by OAS.” Aside from Lula, Kast was also referring to late Peruvian president Alan García, another Marxist operative who reportedly killed himself to avoid justice in the case as police surrounded his home.
As of right now, Bachelet can hide in Geneva behind diplomatic immunity. It would hardly be the first time an individual implicated in the growing Latin America corruption scandal would seek to abuse diplomatic immunity to avoid dealing with the justice system. The New American highlighted, among other instances, the abuse of diplomatic immunity privileges by then-UN Food and Agriculture boss José Graziano da Silva, a key operative in the Foro de São Paulo conspiracy and a close ally of jailed former Brazilian “Lula.” He considered giving Lula a job as “special advisor” to shield him from the law.
Graziano, who worked hard to have journalists jailed for exposing his crimes, also gave former Peruvian First Lady Nadine Heredia a job with diplomatic immunity. The goal, it seems, was to protect her from Peruvian prosecutors. Among other crimes, she was charged with major corruption, usurpation of power, and money laundering for her role in helping to funnel some $150 million stolen from Brazilian taxpayers by the Lula regime into her totalitarian husband’s political campaign for president. Graziano has now been replaced at the FAO with another communist, Qu Dongyu of China’s Communist Party. He reportedly secured the job with bribes and threats, according to diplomats cited in the press, ensuring that his predecessor’s criminal activity remains sealed.
While Bachelet has denied the charges and appears to be hoping the scandal will fade, her minions in Chile are rallying around her and doing everything possible to protect her. Radical Party leader Carlos Maldonado, who served as justice minister in Bachelet’s government, for instance, claimed Bachelet was “totally honest” and “is a person who is not interested in money or power.” Right. Maldonado recognized that there would have to be a thorough investigation and that those involved in Bachelet’s campaign would have to account for what happened. However, that is “something that is totally separate from the role of the ex-president.”
With communist criminals at the UN hiding from justice behind diplomatic immunity, it is past time for some major changes. In truth, the immunity was never supposed to be blanket protection from the law. It was supposed to be for legitimate acts carried out in the line of duty. Unless Bachelet’s legitimate duties included participating in a criminal conspiracy involving mass murderers and thieves to fleece the public and enslave Latin America, she should not be allowed to escape accountability. It is time for the U.S. Congress and President Trump to get to the bottom of this too — especially since American taxpayers are subsidizing the whole grotesque spectacle that is the UN. Justice and the liberties of countless millions across Latin America and beyond hang in the balance.
Related articles:

Wednesday, September 25, 2019

THE GLOBAL WARMING CHILDREN'S CRUSADE EXPLOITING CALLOW YOUTH AS PROPS IN A TRENDY & SINISTER FARCE

THE GLOBAL WARMING CHILDREN'S CRUSADE
EXPLOITING CALLOW YOUTH AS PROPS
IN A TRENDY & SINISTER FARCE 
BY BRUCE THORNTON
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Bruce Thornton is a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center.
In 1212, thousands of children and teens in France and England set off for the Holy Land to convert Muslims to Christianity. Led by shepherds, these mostly poor and dispossessed young people headed for the Mediterranean, believing it would miraculously part and allow them to cross on dry land. Instead, the children, promised free passage by a couple of unscrupulous merchants, were sold into slavery or died in a shipwreck.
Last week’s Climate Strike by schoolchildren to “save the planet” is a grotesque parody of this legend of faith and courage, yet no more likely to accomplish anything useful. The strike was the first act of this week’s UN’s “Global Climate Week,” along with blocking traffic in DC (with the help of Antifa and Black Lives Matter), a “Youth Climate Summit,” and an orgy of hypocrisy at the UN General Assembly. No doubt we’ll see “world leaders” dramatically call for “global action,” then pass symbolic resolutions that, like every “climate summit” since 1979, will do absolutely nothing to lower temperatures enough to stop the warmists’ alleged apocalypse.
But instead of young pilgrims risking and losing their lives on behalf of their faith, the Climate “pilgrims” are mostly the global comfortable and affluent enjoying a day off from school as they preen and pontificate about a subject they know little about, and bask in the attention and flattery of important “grown-ups” like Hollywood stars and venal politicians equally ignorant about how global climate works.
In the “woke” children’s anti-carbon crusade––a word, of course, the progs have proscribed as “Islamophobic––callow youth are increasingly becoming the props in a fashionable farce whose sinister aim is dismantling the West’s economies, and further concentrating political and economic power at the expense of we the people.
This global publicity stunt shows why sensible people don’t take adolescents seriously––and why progressives want to lower the voting age––when it comes to complex issues of public policy and the trade-offs required by a participatory democracy. Most adolescents are by nature narcissists and drama queens, and think histrionic emotion is more important than cold facts, sound arguments, and real-world limits to gratifying their petulant demands for utopia. And they like nothing better than to have supposedly mature adults validate their feelings with attention and novel diagnoses of psychological ailments that cover for mere immaturity. So no surprise we’re now hearing about “eco-anxiety” caused by reports of impending “environmental doom,” calls to stave off a deadly “climate crisis,” as the Economist called a whole special issue hyping climate doom, and warnings that “panic is long overdue,” according to Salon.
The progs know that attention-craving teenagers are the perfect shock-troops for advancing the socialist goals of the left, just as they have been for the antigun lobby. And grownups are giving them a huge stage, including an appearance before the Democrat-controlled Congress by eco-mascots 16-year-old Swedish activist Greta Thunberg and Seattle’s seventeen-year-old Jamie Margolin. Margolin’s comments prove the old wisdom that children should be seen and not heard:
I want the entirety of Congress––in fact, the whole U.S. government–– to remember the fear and despair that my generation lives with every day, and I want you to hold on to it. How do I even begin to convey to you what it feels like to know that within my lifetime the destruction that we have already seen from the climate crisis will only get worse. What adds insult to injury is the fact that we keep getting promised what isn't there. On college applications, I keep getting asked what I want to be when I grow up . . . . Everyone who will walk up to me after this testimony saying I have such a bright future ahead of me will be lying to my face.
As Oscar Wilde said about the extravagantly lachrymose death of Dickens’ Little Nell, one would have to have a heart of stone to read this bathetic cri de coeur and not burst out laughing. If a well-fed, pampered, leisured American teenager–one of the richest human beings to ever walk the earth–thinks she lives in “fear and despair,” she should be packed off to Congo or Iran or Somalia or Venezuela and learn what real “fear and despair” feel like. That Republican Congressmen sat and listened to this blather is yet another instance of their reflexive preemptive cringe in the face of progressive nonsense and bullying.
And why let this appearance before Congress legitimize, even indirectly, the similarly lunatic climate policies proposed by the Dems’ primary candidates? According to the New York Post’s Jonathan Lesser,
Bernie Sanders, for instance, wants all of our electricity to come from renewable resources in just 10 years. Huh? In 2018, the single largest source of renewable energy was large hydroelectric dams, which many environmentalists want to ditch. Wind and solar power provided about 370 terawatt-hours of electricity, roughly 9% of all generation, which was around 4,200 TWh. How does he expect to generate 10 times more wind and solar in 10 years?
Likewise Paul Driessen, who also points out the fantastic silliness of the Dems’ “climate crisis” solutions that rely on “renewable” wind and solar:
So let’s suppose we blanket the United States with enough industrial-scale wind and solar facilities to replace the 3.9 billion megawatt-hours Americans used in 2018 – and we manufacture and install enough king-sized batteries to store sufficient electricity for seven straight windless or sunless days. We would need something on the order of one billion 100-kilowatt-hour, 1,000-pound lithium and cobalt-based battery packs – similar to what Tesla uses in its electric vehicles. (This does not include the extra battery storage required to charge up the cars, trucks, and buses we are supposed to replace with EVs.)
And we still have to calculate the costs of materials like iron, concrete, and rare-earth metals mined in countries that use child and slave labor: As Driessen points out,  “For cobalt alone – say UNICEF and Amnesty International – over 40,000 Congolese children, as young as four years old, slave away in mines, from sunrise to sundown, six or even seven days a week. That’s today. Imagine how many will be needed to serve the ‘ethical green energy utopia.’” Throw in the expense of disposing worn-out components like solar panels and turbine blades, and the pollution caused by mining, constructing, and transporting all these materials, and it’s clear to anyone other than a quarter-educated teenager or a government subsidy-pirate that “free, clean, and renewable” is a pipe dream.
Except, of course, for hydroelectric and nuclear power, which are also renewable and free from CO2 emissions. But the climate catastrophists reject these obvious and cost-effective energy sources: Dams because they intrude on nature and disturb the animals; nuclear because of the still lingering antinuclear hysteria of the Seventies, that era’s big crisis du jour. Also, the antinuclear Dems claim, spent nuclear fuel is too dangerous to store. It doesn’t cut any ice with the catastrophists that Finland, for example––one of those prog pin-up countries so superior to our red-white-and-blue capitalist hell-hole––is building a safe, underground nuclear storage facility. Meanwhile we’ve been sitting on the Yucca Mountain nuclear waste site since 1987, thanks to the environmental lobbies that spend billions gratifying their nature-loving sensibilities at the expense of their fellow citizens.
But we all know what this whole show is really about. The “climate crisis” feeds off of ancient cultural stereotypes about nature as a benevolent mother whom we wicked moderns have sullied and raped with our industrial capitalism and pollution. This narrative serves as a pseudo-religion for wealthy secularized Westerners who take for granted carbon-powered industries and technologies that make idealizing nature affordable. And, unlike most religions, it conveniently requires only virtue-signaling, mouthing fashionable shibboleths, providing political support for policies hoi polloi bear the brunt of, and token “green” rituals like recycling bottles and cans, and buying overpriced “Organic” and “No GMO” foods no more nutritious or safe than the rest. It’s a cheap way to claim a superior status as one of the ecologically “saved,” and condemn to perdition the wicked, greedy “damned,” even as the righteous enjoy a comfortable life subsidized by cheap, carbon-based energy.
More sinister are the numerous green boondoggles that redistribute billions of dollars of public wealth to various institutions and industries through subsidies and research grants, and to the politicians and lobbyists and foundations that facilitate this scam as well as take their cut. They have to work night and day to prop up the anthropogenic, catastrophic global warming melodrama in order to keep the funds flowing by censoring and spinning the daily evidence that their 100-year-old “greenhouse” hypothesis is still a long time away from being proven a fact. That’s why they manipulate climate data and jigger the computer models–– so that there’s always unprecedented warming to hype. For example, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration has massaged temperature data to disappear the recent coldest weather in 20 years. Meanwhile Canada and other countries are destroying raw temperature data because they don’t comport with the “adjusted” numbers that always end up being warmer.
Finally, the real danger here is the continuous dismantling of the Constitution that checks concentrated, expansive power to keep it from encroaching even further on the rights of individuals and the sovereignty of the states. Progressives have for over a century been impatient with these barriers to their grandiose technocratic ambitions. You can hear it in one-time Secretary of State and Senator John Kerry’s tweet about the “climate crisis”: “We just can’t sit on our asses and leave the political process to Neanderthals who don’t want to believe in the future,” he  told an audience in Australia.  That says it all: The arrogant contempt of the self-proclaimed “bright” for the citizens whom the Constitution has given unalienable rights beyond the reach of government, and to whom it has bestowed a “political process” the primary aim of which is to check over-weeing, wannabe tyrants like John Kerry.
Don’t fall for the exploitation of immature, drama-prone children in order to misdirect us from the weakness of the alleged scientific “consensus,” or to camouflage the venal motives of buccaneering researchers and power-hungry politicians who, to paraphrase Petronius, “would pull a dollar out of the dung with their teeth.” The only way to handle any real crisis is to remain free, think for ourselves, and rely on ourselves, our families, our communities, and our common sense.
______________________________________________________________

Using "Climate Change" to Enslave US - Behind The Deep State

In this episode of Behind The Deep State, host Alex Newman explains how globalist Deep State functionaries are fomenting hysteria over "climate change" and "global warming" to steal liberty and money from humanity. Among other issues, Alex discusses the science, the agenda, and the deadly consequences of allowing this fraud to continue. Referenced Videos: Interview with Professor William Happer https://youtu.be/Gm8WJLR28Ys Interview with Dr. Nils-Axel Mörner https://youtu.be/W1PS9-oOfRw Agenda 2030: The Next "Great Leap Forward" https://youtu.be/VxqXf6gDPmI 🚨 Get the Latest News: http://www.thenewamerican.com/

GRETA THUNBERG & THE UNCRC: “CHILDREN’S RIGHTS” USED BY UN TO DESTROY PARENTAL RIGHTS~GRETA'S PARENTS REPORTED TO CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES IN SWEDEN~GRETA'S RAGE ACTIVISM BACKFIRING ON ENVIRONMENTALISTS

CLIMATE CHANGE CULT'S AIM IS POPULATION CONTROL EUGENICS

Greta Thunberg’s Rage Activism is Already BACKFIRING on Environmentalists!!!

DR. STEVE TURLEY REPORTS
SOCIALISTS MEET TO FORM ONE WORLD CHURCH & GOVERNMENT
THEIR DRIVING FORCE: HATRED OF THE UNITED STATES, CAPITALISM, NATIONAL SOVEREIGNTY &
PROTESTANT CHRISTIANITY




Greta & the UNCRC: “Children’s Rights” Used by UN to Destroy Parental Rights
GRETA THUNBERG & THE UNCRC: “CHILDREN’S RIGHTS” USED BY UN TO DESTROY PARENTAL RIGHTS

The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child is a War on Parents

BY DAVID KNIGHT
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Want to know where Hillary Clinton’s “it takes a village” or Melissa Harris-Perry’s “get over the idea that children belong to their parents” came from?
These ideas, and Greta’s UN stunt, are products of a 30-year-old agenda, the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC), that’s received very little attention in spite of the widespread havoc it’s unleashed on children and families.
The UN has produced many agendas. Nixon’s “War on Drugs” was written 10 years earlier, verbatim with all the schedules, by the UN.
Universal Background checks were the goal of the “Gunwalker” & “Fast & Furious” false flags
 that were intended to create a problem that would be solved by Universal Background Checks 
(and universal gun registration).
The War on Drugs and the War on Guns is joined by a UN War on Energy, Mobility & Property — UN 2030 Agenda for Sustainability (formerly UN Agenda 21).
But the most overlooked agenda is the 30-year-old UNCRC. The UNCRC is a War on Parents and, although the US is the only country in the world that hasn’t ratified it, federal judicial tyranny is enforcing it. The video below was part of a movement 10 years ago to formally recognize Parental Rights in a constitutional amendment to stop judicial activism.
The UNCRC has been the basis for • the transgender agenda forced by schools on children as young as kindergarten, • gender dysphoria diagnoses by schools used to perform chemical castrations & mastectomies on minor children against the wishes of the parents, and • the push for removal of age-of-consent laws for pedophilia. Now Greta & 15 other children have filed complaints against five nations based on the UNCRC.
________________________________________________________________
Creepy Enviro Brat Throws Tantrum at UN 
For Some Reason
BY DANIEL GREENFIELD
SEE: https://cms.frontpagemag.com/point/2019/09/creepy-enviro-brat-throws-tantrums-un-some-reason-daniel-greenfield
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Creepy environmentalist brat Greta Thunberg, who belongs in school instead of living out her stage parents' aspirations of fame, threw a tantrum at the UN.
"You have stolen my dreams and my childhood with your empty words," Thunberg began her rant at the U.N.'s Climate Action Summit.
Thunberg is a privileged 16-year-old from one of the more prosperous countries in Europe. Her family is quite well-off. She's now a famous brat and everyone has to pay attention to her tantrums. How exactly did anyone steal this near-adult's childhood?
Like an evil Pippi Longstocking, Thunberg has been prepped to act like the leader of a children's crusade. But she's less Joan of Arc than one of the Children of the Corn, throwing hysterical tantrums and demanding that everyone listen to her, while castigating them as liars and hypocrites once they do.
Some might be tempted to say that this is not atypical behavior from a 16-year-old.
There's some truth to that.
There are very few occasions when 16-year-olds should be given a national or global stage. Justifying school truancy with hysterical tirades about the end of the world isn't one of them. 
If Greta Thunberg didn't need therapy before this, she certainly does now. That and an afterschool job. She has too much time on her hands and too little emotional maturity. Her only tactic is playing the guilt card while accusing all adults of destroying the planet.
These are just teenage antics taken to an obnoxious apocalyptic extreme. 
Greta can't act like an adult. But the adults listening to her tantrums ought to be acting like adults.
________________________________________________________
Surprised? Greta Thunberg's "Coach" A Soros, Bill & Melinda Gates Operative

SCHOOL STRIKE FOR CLIMATE

SURPRISED? GRETA THUNBERG’S “COACH” A SOROS, BILL & MELINDA GATES OPERATIVE

The same globalists seem to have financial ties to every major propaganda movement

BY KELEN MCBREEN
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
16-year-old climate opportunist Greta Thunberg is being pushed by the worldwide establishment after speaking in front of Congress, the U.N., meeting the Pope and being the face of this weekend’s climate protests.
How did this teenage girl become such a dominant figure in the issue of climate protection?
It turns out there are powerful forces behind the sudden rise of the Swedish adolescent, including some of the usual suspects.
A woman who accompanies Thunberg to most 
public events is 
German climate activist Luisa-Marie Neubauer.
EuropeReloaded.com reported, “Thunberg soon also got her own coach – a well-known climate activist from Germany by the name Luisa-Marie Neubauer (pictured). What is the likelihood of a young girl who starts a school strike outside the Swedish parliament, getting schoolchildren from all over the world to join her cause and fight against climate change? And how often do 16-year-olds have their own coaches?”
It turns out Neubauer is the “Youth Ambassador” of the “ONE” foundation, an international lobbying organization funded by George Soros, Bill and Melinda Gates, Bono and others.
In a tweet from 2018, Neubauer wrote, “Perks of being a ONE Youth Ambassador: you get to meet awesome ONE campaigners all over the world.”
According to the “ONE” website, “ONE originated in conversations between Bill Gates and Bono in the early 2000s about the need to better inform Americans about extreme poverty around the world.”
“Together with Melinda Gates, Bobby Shriver, George Soros, Ed Scott, Bob Geldof, and Jamie Drummond, they created an anti-poverty advocacy organization called DATA that focused on deploying celebrities and other influential individuals to urge world leaders to take action on specific development issues,” the site continues.
Like anti-gun activist David Hogg, the globalist establishment is shoehorning Thunberg into the public spotlight to further their agenda even if it means taking advantage of a teenager with Asperger’s.
Alex Jones exposes the manipulation of today’s youth in this exclusive Infowars report:

Who is Greta?
Why is she mad?
Paul Joseph Watson talks about Sweden’s new Global Warming poster child, Greta Thunberg.
________________________________________________________________
Greta's Parents Pictured in Antifa Gear, After Climate Activist Denies Ties to Violent Group

GRETA’S PARENTS PICTURED IN ANTIFA GEAR, AFTER CLIMATE ACTIVIST DENIES TIES TO VIOLENT GROUP

Brainwashed teen exposed as pro-Antifa shill

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
After photos surfaced of Swedish climate activist Greta Thunberg wearing a shirt associated with Antifa, she denied any ties to the violent left-wing protest group.
“Yesterday I posted a photo wearing a borrowed T-shirt that says I’m against fascism,” she tweeted in July. “That T-shirt can apparently to some be linked to a violent movement. I don’t support any form of violence and to avoid misunderstandings I’ve deleted the post. And of course I am against fascism.”
Thunberg went on to criticize her detractors, claiming the shirt was innocuous, “can be bought anywhere” and is only linked to violence “according to some.”
In recent days, however, photos have emerged showing her parents, Svante Thunberg and Malena Ernman, wearing the exact same t-shirt, throwing her whole explanation into question.
The clothing prompted conservatives, including Turning Point USA’s Charlie Kirk, to ask why Congress would allow the pro-Antifa teen to lecture the US.
“She’s been pictured wearing pro-ANTIFA clothing & raising money for ANTIFA causes in Europe,” Kirk charged.
“This is the Democrats’ star witness—a supporter of domestic terrorism?”
Trump supporter Terrence K. Williams also questioned why Thunberg’s parents allow her to wear clothing associated with Antifa, which has faced calls by members of Congress to be labeled a domestic terror group.

Report: Greta’s Parents Reported to Child Services in Sweden~Report being taken very seriously

BY LEO ZAGAMI
in-sweden/; 
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Leo Zagami leozagami.com September 24, 2019
Earlier today, a private person posted pictures of their concern report about Greta Thunberg for child abuse by the parents. The report was allegedly sent to the Kungsholmen’s district administration in Stockholm and is being taken very seriously.
“We have an obligation to assess within 24 hours,”the childcare unit told Swedish local News agency samnytt.se, who added : “When large parts of the adult world and established media participate in the mass psychosis around Greta Thunberg – who obviously doesn’t feel so good – it’s like having to pinch one’s arm. Is this true? What are you doing? This is not healthy.”
 Swedish Party Chairman for Social conservatives and lifestyle liberals, who is also a lawyer  wrote on Twitter:
Since Greta Thunberg began her career as an opinion maker and climate guru just over a year ago, many debaters have expressed concern that the girl may have been exploited by her mother and the public relations consultant behind the campaign said samnytt.se:
“Sedan Greta Thunberg påbörjade sin karriär som opinionsbildare och klimatguru för drygt ett år sedan har många debattörer uttryckt en oro över att flickan kan ha utnyttjats av sin mor och pr-konsulter som står bakom kampanjen.”
 Despite what the MSM reported President Trump did the right thing in ignoring poor Greta yesterday who needs help as soon as possible.

Quote of the Week: Greta Thunberg Claims to be Able to “See” Carbon Dioxide in the Air Anthony Watts
wattsupwiththat.com May 2, 2019
At first, I thought this had to be a joke. Then I thought it must be some sort of misinterpretation. Sadly, no.
From the website Afrinik, quoting the book –Scener ur hjärtat by Malena Ernman, Svante Thunberg
“According to her mother Malena Ernman (48), 16-year-old Swedish climate activist Greta Thunberg can see CO2 with the naked eye. She writes that in the book ‘Scenes from the heart. Our life for the climate’, which she wrote with her family.”
“Greta was diagnosed as a child with obsessive-compulsive disorder and Asperger’s syndrome, just like her younger sister Beata. The activist also has a photographic memory. She knows all the capitals by heart and can list all the chemical elements of the periodic table within one minute. In addition, she has another gift according to her mother.”
“‘Greta is able to see what other people cannot see,’ writes Malena Ernman in the book.”
“’She can see carbon dioxide with the naked eye. She sees how it flows out of chimneys and changes the atmosphere in a landfill.’”
Of course, with a ~ 410 parts per million concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere, we know that is a physical impossibility. Carbon Dioxide is a colorless and odorless gas:
It also does not reflect or absorb any light within the light spectrum that humans can see. Even if Greta had some special ability to see into the near infrared, the absorption spectrum of CO2 is far removed from the human range of color sensitivity.
Source: http://www.ces.fau.edu/nasa/module-2/how-greenhouse-effect-works.php
But, this claim underscores how bizarre her activism has become, and people seem to want to look the other way instead of questioning her abilities and cognitive understanding of the information she professes to know.