Translate

Thursday, August 16, 2018

IMMIGRANTS ON WELFARE WILL SOON HAVE TOUGHER PATH TO CITIZENSHIP

IMMIGRANTS ON WELFARE WILL SOON HAVE TOUGHER PATH TO CITIZENSHIP 
A new plan from President Trump will make it much harder for immigrants on welfare to become citizens. One America's Pearson Sharp explains how Trump's latest plan is aimed at saving U.S. taxpayers billions of dollars every year.

ERDOGAN'S VISIT TO MERKEL RAISES CONCERNS THAT EUROPEAN UNION WILL AID TURKEY FINANCIALLY, "SUPPORT A PATH TO ISLAMIST DICTATORSHIP"

ERDOGAN'S VISIT TO MERKEL RAISES CONCERNS THAT EUROPEAN UNION WILL AID TURKEY FINANCIALLY, "SUPPORT A PATH TO ISLAMIST DICTATORSHIP" 
BY CHRISTINE DOUGLASS-WILLIAMS
SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2018/08/erdogans-visit-to-merkel-raises-concerns-eu-will-aid-turkey-financially-support-a-path-to-islamist-dictatorshiprepublished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Germany’s former finance minister Oskar Lafontaine blasted Ms Merkel in a furious tirade in protest against the visit scheduled just four weeks after the shock crash of the currency that took place last week….. Lafontaine demanded an explanation from the chancellor on the state visit, which will also see President Erdogan scoop military honours after seeking financial backing to soothe the nose-dive of the lira…..The state visit has sparked concerns the EU will top up Turkey’s financial losses and open the floodgates to talks over Turkey’s agreement with the EU illegal migration.
Erdogan is an aggressive Islamic supremacist with equally aggressive expansionist ambitions. He and his ilk manipulate many Western leaders to weaken their resistance to Islamization. Most troubling is that since 2007, “Brussels has set aside more than nine billion euros…trying to prepare Turkey to meet the bloc’s standards in crucial areas of governance,” while “failing to attach conditions to the funds, especially after President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan’s crackdown in the wake of a failed coup in 2016.”
Brussels has been trying to facilitate Turkey’s long-sought full membership in the EU, despite Erdogan’s record. Erdogan continues to blast the West over “Islamophobia” and to accuse the EU of a “crusade against Islam.” Erdogan has also called for an “army of Islam” to attack Israel; a vision of a revived Ottoman empire burns within his soul.
What could possibly go wrong in welcoming Erdogan into the EU?
“Turkey lira CRISIS: Merkel accused of using Erdogan ‘like a BOUNCER’ in furious tirade,” by Carly Read, Express, August 13, 2018:
TURKEY President Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s looming state visit to Germany has sparked outrage, with chancellor Angela Merkel being accused of using the leader of the troubled nation as a “bouncer” in order to protect her own policies as the lira crumbles.
Germany’s former finance minister Oskar Lafontaine blasted Ms Merkel in a furious tirade in protest against the visit scheduled just four weeks after the shock crash of the currency that took place last week.
Mr Lafontaine demanded an explanation from the chancellor on the state visit, which will also see President Erdogan scoop military honours after seeking financial backing to soothe the nose-dive of the lira, which dropped a further nine percent today making its total loss a dangerous 40 percent since he was re-elected.
The state visit has sparked concerns the EU will top up Turkey’s financial losses and open the floodgates to talks over Turkey’s agreement with the EU illegal migration.
Mr Lafontaine said: “The federal government must stop supplying Erdogan with weapons.
“And she has to make it clear that she can not support a path towards an Islamist dictatorship in whatever form.”
He added: “German Chancellor Angela Merkel has engaged Erdogan as a bouncer and is now a prisoner of her own policies.”
German Foreign Minister, Heiko Maas, has defended the visit, which will also see President Erdogan be greeted by Federal President Frank-Walter Steinmeier.
Mr Lafontaine’s criticisms come after tensions between the US and Turkey caused the lira to plummet to a dangerous low.
Turkey was issued fresh sanctions by US President Donald Trump after the nation continued to trade with Iran, which was also sanctioned in a bid to halt its nuclear weapon programme.
The detention of American pastor Andrew Brunson over a suspected terror coup in 2016 also rocked Turkey’s financial system, triggering a 20 percent tariff on aluminium and 50 percent levy on steel…..
_____________________________________________________
Why Trump was right to double tariffs on Turkey
American Islamic Forum for Democracy President Zuhdi Jasser discusses President Trump’s metal tariffs on Turkey and how the country is in economic turmoil.

GLAZOV GANG: FBI TRIED TO KILL ROBERT SPENCER?

GLAZOV GANG: FBI TRIED TO KILL 
ROBERT SPENCER? 
This new Glazov Gang edition features Robert Spencer, the director of Jihad Watch and a Shillman Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center. He is author of the New York Times bestsellers The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam (and the Crusades) and The Truth About Muhammad. His new book is The History of Jihad From Muhammad to ISIS.
Robert discussed Did The FBI Want Me Dead? — exploring the disturbing question of whether a U.S. intelligence agency actually acted on behalf of Jihadists in Garland, Texas.
Don’t miss it!
Subscribe to the Glazov Gang‘s YouTube Channel and follow us on Twitter: @JamieGlazov.
Please donate through our Pay Pal account to help The Glazov Gang keep going.

PATREON & MASTERCARD BAN ROBERT SPENCER WITHOUT EXPLANATION

PATREON & MASTERCARD BAN ROBERT SPENCER WITHOUT EXPLANATION 
BY ROBERT SPENCER
SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2018/08/patreon-and-mastercard-ban-robert-spencer-without-explanationrepublished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Recently Alex Jones and Gavin McInnes have been banned from various social media platforms, in a desperate attempt by the Left to ensure that the 2016 election results aren’t repeated in 2018. Some people say it doesn’t matter that these men were de-platformed, because they don’t like what they say, and what’s more, these are all private companies. They are indeed private companies, but they have a virtual monopoly today over the means of communication, and once they start banning people because they don’t like what they say, they’ve set a precedent that is inimical to the survival of a free society.
If only approved viewpoints can be aired, we live in a totalitarian state, not a free society, and the effects of this will reverberate in our lives in ways we cannot imagine. If you think that the banning will stop when those who are deemed “crazy” or “extremist” are all banned, you’re in for a surprise.
Yesterday, they came for me, albeit in not yet as thoroughgoing a manner as the way they went after Jones and McInnes.
A few weeks ago the great David Wood swung by my office and helped me set up a Patreon account. We made a video in which I explained that I had come into possession of what once had been a working TV studio, and that I hoped to make it into a working studio again for regular Jihad Watch videos.
The whole endeavor had barely gotten off the ground, however, when I received this email yesterday afternoon:
April (Patreon)
Aug 14, 3:20 PM PDT
Hi Robert,
My name is April and I’m on the Trust & Safety team here at Patreon. I’ve been notified by Mastercard that we must remove your account from Patreon, effective immediately.
Mastercard has a stricter set of rules and regulations than Patreon, and they reserve the right to not offer their services to accounts of their choosing. This is in line with their terms of service, which means it’s something we have to comply by.
I have paid out your remaining creator balance of $475.22 to you via direct deposit.
I’m sorry for the inconvenience and frustration this might cause.
Let me know if you have any questions or concerns — I’m here to help.
Best,
April
Patreon Trust and Safety
Monday – Friday
9am- 6pm PST
I’d been given no warning before this of anything amiss with my account, which at the time consisted of that single video announcing the initiative, along with a note announcing that I would be starting a livestream (I had planned weekly livestreams, “This Week In Jihad,” and recorded one and a half, the second one being cut short by a bad hotel connection. This nascent series will now, of course, be discontinued). That was it. So what violated their rules? They hadn’t explained. But when I went to my Patreon account, I got this:
So I wrote back to April:
I see my account was also disabled. Explanation, please.
No answer. Later on Twitter, however, when I announced this, Patreon responded:
I've been axed from Patreon, without explanation, warning or notice -- no doubt as part of the ongoing efforts of the Left to deny all platforms to those who reject its agenda. To those who supported me there, thank you, and I'm sorry we couldn't follow through on plans. pic.twitter.com/rJ8kaUNqYI
Hi Robert, we emailed you earlier today which explained that unfortunately Mastercard required us to remove your account. You replied to us but if you have further questions we're happy to keep emailing.
And:
.@jihadwatchRS has been banned from @Patreon without explanation.

This is a coordinated attack by Big tech to shut down Conservatives.

When will @realDonaldTrump speak up about the silencing of his supporters?
Hey, we've been emailing with Robert today to explain the situation as unfortunately Mastercard required us to remove his account. We will continue to email with him if he has further questions.
This was plainly disingenuous. They had not “been emailing” with me, never explained why MasterCard objected to my account or why they had to comply with MasterCard’s wishes, and didn’t answer my request for an explanation. I don’t have a MasterCard and didn’t have one attached to my Patreon account, so MasterCard really wasn’t involved — unless it owns Patreon, which is apparently the case.
Of course, what is almost certainly going on here is that MasterCard/Patreon is deleting accounts that have been smeared by the hard-Left propaganda hate group the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), despite the fact that the SPLC has been resoundingly discredited. The SPLC defames me as a “hate group leader” and “anti-Muslim extremist.” Here, for the record, is my response to their charges, offered despite the fact that Patreon offered no chance to appeal or rebut whatever charges got me banned.
Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) Falsehoods about Robert Spencer
  1. “Spencer is one of the most prolific anti-Muslim figures in the United States.”
I am not “anti-Muslim.” I oppose jihad terror and Sharia oppression of women, non-Muslims, and others. I am no more “anti-Muslim” than foes of the Nazis were “anti-German.”
  1. “A career anti-Muslim figure, Spencer has devoted much of his life to writing books, countless articles, and producing other content all with the goal of vilifying and maligning Muslims and the Islamic faith.”
My goal is not now and has never been “vilifying and maligning Muslims and the Islamic faith.” My goal is to convey Islamic doctrines and beliefs accurately in order to help people understand the phenomenon of Islamic jihad terror.
  1. “He considers these texts to be innately extremist and violent, and refuses to acknowledge nonviolent passages and centuries of adapted interpretations.”
Actually, I’ve published online a commentary on the entire Qur’an, including the nonviolent passages, and written extensively within it about nonviolent interpretations of various passages. That’s here: https://www.jihadwatch.org/quran-commentary
  1. “Spencer argues that extremists, like Osama bin Laden and ISIS, are the most authentic interpretation and practice of Islam, despite being actively rejected by the overwhelming majority of the world’s Muslims. He brushes this fact off by bombastically claiming the majority of Muslims, either do not understand their own holy book or are masking their extremism.”
I’ve never made such claims, and have in fact spoken of a spectrum of belief, knowledge, and fervor among Muslims that accounts for why most do not wage jihad.
  1. “By painting Rauf as an extremist who was striving to build a ‘victory mosque’ to celebrate the destruction of the World Trade Center, the two leaders of SIOA sought to block the project while portraying all Muslims as radical – an assertion simply not supported by facts.”
We never stated or implied that “all Muslims” are “radical.”
  1. “Spencer also attacks individuals and organizations that claim to represent mainstream Muslims. This is most commonly done through accusations of those entities acting as secret operatives to destroy the West.”
In reality, I merely note the abundantly documented ties of groups such as CAIR to Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood. See, for example, here: https://www.investigativeproject.org/2340/federal-judge-agrees-cair-tied-to-hamas
  1. “Spencer is known to have associations with European racists and neo-fascists. However, he claims that his contact with them is merely incidental.”
I have no associations with European racists or neo-fascists, and never have. I have had some associations with people who were falsely accused of being racist and neo-fascist.
  1. “In Spencer’s 2017 book Confessions of an Islamophobe, a memoir that among other things dives into the nuances of being an anti-Muslim hate monger, he reveals he has no plans of slowing down.”
In reality, the book explains why opposing jihad terror and Sharia oppression do not make one an anti-Muslim hate monger.
Muslim Basher Robert Spencer Shows White Nationalist Colors,” https://www.splcenter.org/hatewatch/2011/11/09/muslim-basher-robert-spencer-shows-white-nationalist-colors 
  1. “Proving yet again that nothing is beneath him, anti-Muslim propagandist Robert Spencer has put himself firmly in the camp of open white nationalists with an article published yesterday in Crisis magazine, a conservative Catholic publication.”
I am not a white nationalist, openly or secretly, and that article simply criticized multiculturalism. It did not discuss race at all.
  1. “Spencer’s piece is punctuated with a recommended reading list that might have been taken from the bookshelf of John Tanton, the racist architect of the modern nativist movement.”
I had nothing to do with the compilation of that reading list, and did not see it before the piece was published. None of the books on it are genuinely racist; they’re simply against mass migration of non-Europeans into Europe, the devastating effects of which we are seeing now.
  1. “Anthony M. Esolen’s The Politically Incorrect Guide to Western Civilization, which was published by the white nationalist Regnery Press…”

Regnery Publishing is not “white nationalist.” It is a leading mainstream conservative publishing house that has published books by numerous mainstream conservative figures, including David Horowitz, Dinesh D’Souza, Ann Coulter, etc.

14,597 COMPLAINTS LATER, SAN FRANCISCO "POOP PATROL" TO TACKLE CITY'S FECAL CRISIS~OFFICIALS IGNORE ROOT ISSUES OF HEALTH EMERGENCY

MAYOR LONDON BREED IS BREEDING 
HEALTH RISKS; BUT WHO CARES? AS WITH ALL LIBERALS, A CRISIS IS AN OPPORTUNITY TO SPEND MORE & TAX MORE 

San Francisco's new 'poop patrol' will try to find waste before you do

ONE FLUSH WON'T BE ENOUGH!
HOMELESS AREN'T MOVING
SAN FRANCISCO "POOP PATROL" TO TACKLE CITY'S FECAL CRISIS~OFFICIALS IGNORE ROOT ISSUES OF HEALTH EMERGENCY 
BY DAN LYMAN
SEE: https://www.newswars.com/san-francisco-poop-patrol-to-tackle-citys-fecal-crisis/republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
San Francisco will be deploying a newly-formed ‘Poop Patrol’ to mitigate the city’s now-infamous crisis of human waste in public areas.
“A team of five Public Works staffers will begin patrolling the alleys around Polk Street and other hot spots in a vehicle equipped with a steam cleaner,” according to the San Francisco Chronicle.
The Poop Patrol will work to remove feces before locals have a chance to report incidents to a city 311 hotline – which has already received nearly 15,000 such complaints thus far in 2018, the Chronicle reports.
“We’re trying to be proactive,” said Mohammed Nuru, Director of Public Works. “We’re actually out there looking for it.”
San Francisco Mayor London Breed recently told local media that there is “more feces on the sidewalks than I’ve ever seen.”
Infowars has documented the on-going decay of San Francisco and other regions along the West Coast, where socialist policies have led to rampant homelessness, drug abuse, and a mounting health emergency.
A grievance filed recently with the California Department of Transportation by the International Union of Operating Engineers alleged that the health and safety of highway maintenance personnel were being jeopardized because they were forced to clean up toxic homeless encampments.
“Feces and urine and feminine products and all kinds of things on the ground; needles, syringes – you know they use buckets, five-gallon buckets for toilets, and it gets really disgusting,” said Director of Public Employees, Steve Crouch.
In Oregon, Portland Police Association President Daryl Turner issued a public statement last month blasting city officials for allowing the city to “become a cesspool.”
“Livability that once made Portland a unique and vibrant city is now replaced with human feces in businesses doorways, in our parks, and on our streets,” Turner wrote.

MUSLIM MIGRANTS TORCH OVER 100 CARS ACROSS SWEDEN IN "COORDINATED ATTACKS"

MUSLIM MIGRANTS TORCH OVER 100 CARS ACROSS SWEDEN IN 
"COORDINATED ATTACKS" 
Residents are rocked by attacks in Sweden, where migrants set fire to over a hundred cars across the country in what police say are “well-coordinated attacks.” One America’s Pearson Sharp has the latest as Sweden’s massive immigration crisis continues to grow.

Published on Aug 15, 2018

IN RELIGIOUS CRACKDOWN, CHINA INTERNS MILLIONS FOR "RE-EDUCATION"

VIDEO: 
IN RELIGIOUS CRACKDOWN, CHINA INTERNS MILLIONS FOR RE-EDUCATION
BY ALEX NEWMAN
SEE: https://www.thenewamerican.com/world-news/asia/item/29789-in-religious-crackdown-china-interns-millions-for-re-education?vsmaid=592&vcid=3987republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
The Communist Chinese dictatorship is reportedly holding over a million Muslim Uighurs (also spelled Uyghurs) in “counter-extremism centers” in the Western province of Xinjiang, according to evidence presented at a United Nations committee hearing in Geneva last week. Some two to three million victims are said to be in cultural and political “re-education” camps, too. One UN expert said the regime had turned the vast Xinjiang region into what resembles a “massive internment camp” where people have no rights. Revelations surrounding the reported mass internment of ethnic and religious minorities coincided with a broader initiative by Beijing to suppress all religions that are not controlled by the Communist Party of China, ranging from Christians and Muslims to Falun Gong practitioners. Top U.S. officials are also sounding the alarm.  
The explosive accusations, which made headlines around the world, came on August 10 during the opening session on China of the UN “Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination” (CERD). “We are deeply concerned at the many numerous and credible reports that we have received that in the name of combating religious extremism and maintaining social stability (China) has changed the Uighur autonomous region into something that resembles a massive internment camp that is shrouded in secrecy, a sort of ‘no-rights zone,’” said vice chair of the UN committee Gay McDougall, adding that most of those in detention had not been convicted or even charged with a crime.
McDougall, a far-left American activist, noted that Uighurs and other Muslims in China were being treated as “enemies of the state” due only to their ethno-religious identity. She also pointed to evidence that the regime was persecuting people merely for using Muslim greetings, wearing head coverings, having long beards, or possessing halal food, according to media reports. And finally, she cited reports that Beijing has been stealing DNA from millions of people in the region and compiling a massive database, combined with an unprecedented level of police-state surveillance. Even relatives of journalists who have reported on the mass incarceration in Xinjiang have been rounded up by the regime, multiple sources said.
In the re-education camps, former detainees told the Associated Press that they were forced to denounce their faith and declare their submission to the Communist Party instead. “Hour upon hour, day upon day, Omir Bekali and other detainees in far western China’s new indoctrination camps had to disavow their Islamic beliefs, criticize themselves and their loved ones and give thanks to the ruling Communist Party,” the AP reported in May. When the man refused, he was put in solitary confinement, deprived of food, forced to stand at a wall for hours on end, and more, until he was finally ready to commit suicide after just a few weeks.  
Another UN panel member, Yemhelhe Mint Mohamed, blasted what she described as the “arbitrary and mass detention of almost one million Uighurs.” Speaking to the 50-member delegation from the Communist Chinese dictatorship present at the meeting, Mohamed also asked about broader religious freedom issues. “What is the level of religious freedom available now to Uighurs in China?” she asked. “What legal protection exists for them to practice their religion?” Of course, the answer is none.
Outside of China, Uighur activists were relieved to see the issue getting attention. “I’m extremely pleased with the UN CERD Committee for raising these important issues with the Chinese delegation,” said Dolkun Isa, the president of the Munich-based World Uyghur Congress (WUC). “This has given us more faith in the work of the committee … and I am glad to see that the extrajudicial detention of some 1 million Uyghurs has received the attention of the UN.” Isa noted that the Chinese regime would “play word games” and lie in response. “It is my hope that the U.N. CERD Committee members will not be fooled by these maneuvers and instead get to the bottom of these issues with real answers and solutions,” he added.
The U.S. government expressed serious concerns, too. In a social-media post about the hearing and the accusations that millions were being “re-educated” in communist camps, the U.S. government mission to the UN called for it to stop. “We remain deeply troubled by reports of an ongoing crackdown on Uighurs and other Muslims in China,” the U.S. mission said on Twitter. “We call on China to end their counterproductive policies and free all of those who have been arbitrarily detained.”
In Washington, prominent lawmakers were also speaking out. In a letter to U.S. Ambassador to China Terry Branstad, Senator Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) and Representative Chris Smith (R-N.J.), the co-chairs of the Congressional-Executive Commission on China, asked for action. “Uyghurs and other ethnic minorities in the XUAR [Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region] have been subjected to arbitrary arrest, egregious restrictions on religious practice and culture, and a digitized surveillance system so pervasive that every aspect of daily life is monitored,” they said. “There are credible media reports that as many as 500,000 to a million people are or have been detained in what are being called ‘political education centers,’ the largest mass incarceration of a minority population in the world today.”
The two lawmakers also raised concerns about the regime’s arrest of the family members of reporters working for the U.S. government-backed Radio Free Asia. “These detentions serve to intimidate the families of U.S. government employees and undermine some of the most effective reporting from the XUAR, a region which is increasingly off limits to international reporters, members of civil society and diplomats,” they wrote. “If there is no immediate resolution of these cases, we ask that the State Department consider denying visas to executives or administrative staff of Chinese-run state media operating in the United States.”
As usual, Communist Chinese functionaries denied the reports, saying that there is “no such thing as re-education centers” in Xinjiang. In response, Chinese Human Rights Defenders posted photos on Twitter showing one of the camps. “What about ‘de-extremism education reform center’ or ‘correction concentration education base’ as shown in this photo?” asked the group. “Evidences of mass incarceration are undeniable.” The group also posted a photo of a seemingly empty village, saying the “residents have been disappeared” and urged investigators to go see for themselves.
Virtually every Chinese delegate parroted variations of the same script. “The argument that one million Uighurs are detained in re-education centers is completely untrue,” said Ma Youqing, one of 50 high-level communist officials to respond to the committee. “There is neither deliberate targeting at a particular ethnic minority, nor suppressing or restricting the rights or the freedom of religious belief of the Uighur people.”
Another Communist Chinese delegate, Hu Lianhe, also denied that there were re-education centers or that anyone's religious freedom was being violated. But right after that, he admitted that “those who are deceived by religious extremism … shall be assisted through resettlement and education.” In other words, if the regime decides your religious views are extreme — and according to the regime, not being a communist is extreme — then you can be subject to forced relocation and indoctrination at gunpoint.
Communist Party of China mouthpiece Global Times put out a cryptic editorial blasting the “West” for its concerns. “There is no doubt that the current peace and stability in Xinjiang is partly due to the high intensity of regulations. Police and security posts can be seen everywhere in Xinjiang,” the editorial said, praising the “strong ruling power of the Communist Party of China” for allegedly maintaining stability. “Xinjiang is at a special stage of development where there is no room for destructive Western public opinions. Peace and stability must come above all else. With this as the goal, all measures can be tried.”
Of course, UN “experts” are notoriously unreliable. Many of them are actual Socialists or even Marxists. And the UN CERD is outrageous, even by UN standards. For instance, last year, the UN committee issued an “early warning” against America. As part of that, it declared that the U.S. government must ban certain speech, regardless of the First Amendment or the inalienable right to free speech, to be in compliance with the UN “International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination.” McDougall, the UN expert who first raised the concerns, also has baggage. Among her many troubling affiliations are ties to the Institute for Policy Studies (IPS), an outfit that was exposed as a Soviet KGB front by Czech intelligence defector Ladislav Bittman and others.
Ironically, just last year, the UN “human rights” apparatus came under fire for aiding and abetting the Chinese regime's efforts to silence anyone who would expose its crimes. As The New American documented at the time, the UN handed to Beijing the names of activists who were set to expose the regime's crimes at a UN review of China's record. One of the dissidents in question ultimately died in detention. At least several others whose identities were provided to the regime by UN officials were detained ahead of their trips to Geneva. And then, making matters worse, the UN “human rights” leadership retaliated against the UN whistleblower who exposed and stopped the whole sordid affair.
While the Communist Chinese dictatorship engages in barbaric oppression, including forced abortions and organ harvesting from dissidents, it has also quietly seized control over huge swaths of the architecture of “global governance.” Chinese Communist agents now run multiple UN agencies, and even INTERPOL, the self-styled global “law-enforcement” body. And already, the brutal dictatorship is abusing this power to advance totalitarianism at home and abroad as it pursues what it calls a “New World Order.” The regime is also building up a powerful “China Lobby” in Washington.
But unfortunately for the victims of the savage dictatorship, which has murdered more people than any other in history, relying on the UN to protect one's “human rights” is tantamount to hoping a fox will protect the rights of the hens in the hen house. Rather than waiting for the dictator-dominated UN, Americans should demand that Congress quit enabling and propping up Beijing via suicidal trade policies and other insanity. The globalist establishment, including the Council on Foreign Relations, has been building up the regime in China for decades. It is time for Americans aiding and abetting Beijing's savagery to be held accountable.
Related articles: