Translate

Monday, November 20, 2017

NEW VIDEO OF ROBERT SPENCER AT STANFORD UNIVERSITY WITH BETTER SOUND~DEAN NANCI HOWE THANKS FASCIST STUDENTS AS THEY DISRUPT EVENT

 GLEICHSCHALTUNG (NAZIFICATION)
EXCERPTS:
"Gleichschaltung, translated as Nazification, was applied to Freiburg University, Frankfurt University, Göttingen University and the other universities in 1930s Germany, as they marginalized, often brutalized, and then eliminated Jews and antifascists who opposed anti-Semitism and believed in free speech. Many German professors and students enthusiastically supported Gleichschaltung including the philosopher Martin Heidegger and lawyers Ernst Forsthoff and Otto Koellreuter.
Stanford has emerged as the latest American university to demonstrate its commitment to Gleichschaltung. Robert Spencer, New York Times best selling author, free speech advocate and fighter against all things anti-Semitic, was effectively prevented from having an audience last week at Stanford." 
__________________________________________________
NEW VIDEO OF ROBERT SPENCER AT STANFORD UNIVERSITY WITH BETTER SOUND~
DEAN NANCI HOWE THANKS FASCIST STUDENTS 
AS THEY DISRUPT EVENT
BY ROBERT SPENCER
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 
Here is a new video of the full event at Stanford on Tuesday night, including the walkout staged by Stanford’s fascist community, courtesy Stanford College Republicans.
Look at the screenshot. It is taken from during the walkout. At 17:44, Nanci Howe, Associate Dean and Director of Student Affairs appears, grinning happily at the fascist students who are walking out, patting one on the back, exchanging some happy words with another, and clearly enjoying the walkout. She exits stage left at 18:02.

Howe and Snehal Naik, Assistant Dean and Associate Director of Student Affairs, ensured that as few Stanford students as possible would hear me. They did this first by making sure that the hall was packed with students who had no intention of attending the lecture, but were there only to sabotage it by denying seats to people who actually wanted to attend. They even kept out some members of the College Republicans, the group that was sponsoring the event.
Then, after the walkout, they refused to allow in people who actually wanted to attend, refusing repeated requests to do so.
They also refused to allow the Young America’s Foundation to stream the event, clearly because they knew what was in the offing and did not want video going out live that would show just how much Stanford has deteriorated and how opposed it is to free discourse.
As you watch Howe enjoying her big moment, reflect on how Stanford, and other American universities today, are no longer centers of higher learning, but factories of hard-Left indoctrination. Howe should be fired immediately, of course, and Stanford should demonstrate that it believes in the freedom of speech with more than just lip service. But instead, Howe will probably get promoted, with a big raise.
_________________________________________________
SEE ALSO:
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2017/11/video-stanford-dean-nanci-howe-congratulates-student-fascists-as-they-disrupt-robert-spencer-event 

UK APOSTASY: LGBT FRIENDLY FEMALE ANGLICAN CHURCH PASTRIX SAYS TO STOP CALLING GOD "HE", & INSTEAD USE GENDER NEUTRAL PRONOUNS

 THE NON BINARY PERSONA OF GOD? 
SO SHE PROCLAIMS:
 http://d.christiantoday.com/en/full/44693/rachel-treweek.jpg?w=760&h=505&l=50&t=40-

FROM WIKIPEDIA: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rachel_Treweek-The Diocese of Gloucester announced that, in January 2017, Treweek would preside at an LGBTI Eucharist with Inclusive Church.

AND:  https://www.christiantoday.com/article/senior.anglican.bishop.to.preside.at.lgbt.eucharist/102037.htm;

EXCERPTS:  A senior Anglican bishop is set to preside at an LGBT Eucharist in January to "offer a safe space" to gay worshippers.

The Rt Rev Rachel Treweek, Bishop of Gloucester, will celebrate the ceremony set up by Inclusive Church, a LGBT-affirming network of Anglicans, the group reports. It is thought to be the first time a senior diocesan bishop has led an LGBT communion and prompted concern from conservative Anglicans.

Church Pastor Says to Stop Calling God “He,” and Instead Use Gender-Neutral Pronouns 

SEE: http://pulpitandpen.org/2017/11/13/church-pastor-says-to-stop-calling-god-he-and-instead-use-gender-neutral-pronouns/; 

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 
So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them. – Genesis 1:27
The Holy Spirit wrote that through the hands of Moses. God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him… The Bible is God’s revelation of himself, and he has revealed himself as the male gender. This is not a human construct; this is the revelation constructed in the mind of God. Maleness is how God self-identifies. Of course, God the Father (another self-identification of God) does not have a body, and is Spirit (John 4:24), but the lack of physical flesh for the First Person of Trinity doesn’t mean God lacks a gender. For in fact, God ascribes to himself gender.
However, the Reverend Rachel (there’s your first problem) Treweek insists on avoiding gender-specific language when referencing the Almighty. A bishop in the Church of England in Gloucester – who happens to be the first female bishop to sit in the House of Commons – says that God should not be referred to as “he.” She says, “We’re told that God created human beings in God’s likeness… If I am made in the image of God, then God is not to be seen as male. God is God.”
Again, the Scripture reveals the male pronoun for God. That women are made in the Imago Dei, as are men, does not imply that God is a female. Likewise, white people, black people, and brown people who are Imago Dei, but that does not imply that God is white, black or brown. Midgets are Imago Dei, but that does not mean God is a midget. Physically or mentally disabled people are made in the Imago Dei, but that does not mean that God is physically or mentally disabled.
However,וַיִּבְרָא אֱלֹהִים אֶת־הָֽאָדָם בְּצַלְמֹו בְּצֶלֶם אֱלֹהִים בָּרָא אֹתֹו זָכָר וּנְקֵבָה בָּרָא אֹתָֽם ׃ does say – explicitly so – that God is a he and a him.
Treweek says that even she has a problem remembering to use gender-inclusive pronouns for God, saying, “Sometimes I lapse, but I try not to. I am not in the business of wanting to offend anyone, but I do want to gently challenge people.” Treweek seems unconcerned about offending God, who she believes is a morphoditic blob.
If you think the upper-ups in the Church of England would be disappointed with Treweek’s departure from orthodoxy, rest assured that they are not. Reverend Miranda Threlfall-Holmes, vicar of Belmont and Pittington in Durham, said, “Recently the Church has been concentrating so much on whether we should have women bishops, we took our eye off the ball about God. Theologians have always argued that God is neither male nor female. We are created in God’s image. God doesn’t have a gender – God is beyond gender.”
Of course, no. Theologians have not always argued that God is without gender. That is patently absurd, historically.
“We don’t have a non-gendered pronoun to use to refer to God here,” Threlhall said, “but in some other countries they don’t have that problem – in Sweden they don’t have male or female pronouns. Our pronouns and our language really do affect what we believe. I’m pleased that Rachel is using her position to make these points. I’d quite like to see some male bishops do so, too – I am sure they would agree with her.”
Of course, the question isn’t if other countries have such a thing as a gender-specific pronoun, the question is if God has a gender-specific pronoun. And because the Bible was written in a language with gender-specific pronouns, we can rest assured that God has revealed himself as he, him, and Father. However, Trelhall is very wrong about Sweden not having a way to pronounce gender. In Swedish, the male pronoun is han and the female pronoun is hon. What has most likely confused Threlhall is that feminists in Sweden have only recently proposed a gender-neutral pronoun, hen (which is pretty funny, because in English that’s the name of a female chicken).
In Swedish, Genesis 1:27 reads, “Och Gud skapade människan till sin avbild, till Guds avbild skapade han henne, till man och kvinna skapade han dem” (emphasis ours). You might notice the Swedish male pronoun in bold.
You can read about the politically correct lunacy here.

THE LEFT'S INESCAPABLE HATE PROBLEM: THEIR HATE DOESN'T COUNT, BUT YOUR HATE SHOULD GET YOU BANNED FROM EVERYTHING

THE LEFT'S INESCAPABLE HATE PROBLEM: 
THEIR HATE DOESN'T COUNT, BUT YOUR HATE SHOULD GET YOU BANNED FROM EVERYTHING
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 
(Natural News) The Left has found a whole new weapon to silence conservative voices: “Hate.” The problem is, their hate doesn’t count. Only the hate they selectively designate to be “hate” is punished.
Here’s how the contortion works: Google, Twitter, Facebook, YouTube and other internet gatekeepers are increasingly banning and censoring users and content by rolling out terms of service that give them justification to silence anyone peddling “hate.” But what is hate, exactly?
According to the Left, “hate” is any criticism of gays, lesbians, transgenders, black people, abortion clinics, Muslims and so on. No thoughtful criticism of such “protected” subjects is allowed, since it’s all deemed to be “hate.”
Yet at the same time, the Left openly encourages and practices its own hatred against a wide range of targets which are automatically deemed to be “okay to hate.” These targets include:
  • White people (“white privilege”)
  • Men (“toxic masculinity”)
  • Christians
  • Soldiers and veterans
  • Police officers
  • President Trump, Sarah Palin, Ann Coulter and other conservatives
  • Heterosexuals
  • America’s founders
Thus, the Left isn’t actually opposed to hate. They fully support hate as long as it’s directed to specific political enemies. To further pull off this contortion, of course, they make sure their own hatred is never labeled “hate.” Instead, the Left’s HATE is called “diversity.” And diversity, by definition of the Left, excludes people of white skin color. To further the delusion, this exclusion of Whites is labeled “inclusiveness,” while attacks on Christians are labeled “tolerance.”

Left-wing truthism: White people are “dangerous” to everyone

This targeted hatred of the Left is openly repeated across the left-wing news media, Hollywood movies, universities and other outlets. As just one example, an MSNBC panelist recently declared that white men “pose the biggest threat to Americans,” insisting that merely being white makes a person a danger to society. (She apparently has no familiarity with the work of MLK Jr. who correctly declared that judging people by the color of their skin is shallow and stupid.)
This openly racist hatred from the Left is widely encouraged and reinforced by late-night comedy shows, Saturday Night Live, stand-up comedy and other sources of “humor” that are really little more than hatred disguised as comedy. Remember when Johnny Carson ran late-night variety TV? A true classic, Carson was genuinely funny. But today, we get Jimmy Kimmel, a twisted, deranged Leftist who uses his late night TV platform to spew hatred and vitriol against his political enemies… all in the name of being “funny,” of course.
But it isn’t funny at all. It’s just another form of hatred disguised as political correctness. Worse, it’s turning into actual violence in the streets of America. That’s why anti-white hate crimes are the fastest-growing category of hate crimes in America, according to the FBI’s own statistics.

The Left is hopelessly blind to its own hatred

What’s so remarkable about all this is how the Left remains utterly blind to its own hatred. When UC Berkeley students penned articles in the student newspaper calling for conservative speakers to be murdered in order to halt their speech, this was widely accepted on the Left as a seemingly reasonable practice. It wasn’t deemed “hatred” at all. In fact, the Left tells itself that hating conservatives is a form of anti-hate (or “anti fascism” as the narrative goes).
According to the Left, then, if you are full of hatred for all the correct targets (Christians, solders, police, white men, etc.), that isn’t hate at all. It’s love.
This is the kind of twisted, deranged logic summarized by the Left’s mantra, “LOVE TRUMPS HATE,” which really means that if you express sufficient hatred toward Donald Trump, you will be loved by the Left, which is full of haters. Achieving acceptance and love, in other words, only requires that you hate all the same people they hate. Yet the Left lives in denial about its own hate problem, refusing to acknowledge that the entire left-wing movement in America is now steeped in hatred and fantasies of murder against political enemies. Case in point? Kathy Griffin.
The Left isn’t about love, you see. It’s about bullying people with hatred, then using selective enforcement of anti-hate rules to censor and suppress all conservative voices. See this article on The Daily Sheeple: VIDEO: Angry mob of Hillary Clinton supporters attack female reporter, attempt to silence free speech.

Why isn’t Twitter banning users who express hatred toward white people, Christians or the President?

Although Twitter aggressively bans users who express anything resembling hatred toward gays or transgenders, Twitter almost never bans users for expressing the same degree of hatred toward Christians, whites or President Trump.
Ever wonder why? It’s because to the Left, hatred toward Christians, whites and President Trump isn’t recognized as hate. It’s actually a form of virtue signaling to other leftists, which is necessary to be accepted and loved by the Left. Hatred, you see, is the prerequisite to left-wing love.
This is why the liberal mob has become so dangerous to society. Far from promoting love and unity, the Left has actually transformed into a dangerous cult of totalitarian thought control and demanded obedience, all powered by intense emotional hatred coupled with a total abandonment of reason.
If you do not agree with the Left on a given topic — no matter how absurd the Left’s stance — you are immediately branded as being engaged in “hate.” Once branded, you can then be censored, insulted and blacklisted from society in the name of the Left “stopping hate.” This is how Google, Facebook, YouTube and Twitter plan to make sure Democrats win the next presidential election in 2020: The Democrat candidate will be selected from one or more victim groups of the Left — transgenders, women, minorities, gays, etc. — and then any rational criticism of that candidate’s policies will be stifled via accusations of “hate speech.”
Even rational, science-based questioning of the Left’s deranged narratives earns any thinking person this same label of “hate.” For example, the Left now believes that biological sex is no longer determined by genetics. Instead, according to the Left, a person’s biological sex is now determined by a wish or a hope… and it can be changed at any moment by merely declaring such a change. Remember, this is the same Left that has, for decades, insisted that gay people are born gay, reminding us that being gay “isn’t a choice.” A rational person might point out the glaring contradiction in these two beliefs — that gay people are “born gay” but biological sex is a “choice” — but that person would be immediately branded a purveyor of HATE for the simple reason that when it comes to left-wing narrative myths, no questions are allowed.
Raising intelligent questions, you see, is now considered an act of hate according to the Left. In fact, any challenge to the false narratives of the Left is branded HATE as a crude control mechanism to stifle speech and punish intelligent thinking. The Owellian overtones in all this are, of course, too obscene to ignore: The Left has become the Ministry of Trutheven when nearly everything the Left espouses is based on lies.
Remember, according to the Left, if you HATE all the correct people, you will be LOVED. In other words, “Hate = Love” to the deranged, lunatic Left.

Fake news, fake facts and narrative myths

Part of the Left’s descent into derangement and cultism is their reliance on false reality reinforcement via fake news, fake “facts,” fake science and narrative myths. The Left has historically relied on narrative myths to explain to themselves how things work, even when such myths stand in total contradiction to reality.
As mentioned above, the transgenderism myth is one such example. It involves Leftists denying biological reality to such an insane degree that transgenderism-promoting Bill Nye— who absurdly claims that “transgenderism is evolution” — even edited his own “Science Guy” shows from the 1990s to remove all the lessons about genetics, chromosomes and biological sex. Quite literally, left-wing science figures are now engaged in revisionist history and selective editing of educational materials to alter the narrative in order to fit the modern-day lunacy of the Left (which has permanently departed from physical reality).
Similarly, in the world of media, the Left has constructed an elaborate narrative myth that claims President Trump colluded with “the Russians” to steal the election from the rightful President, Hillary Clinton. This narrative lacks even a shred of credible evidence in the real world, but through the construction of an elaborate media bubble, nearly all Leftists believe that myth, even when it has no basis in reality whatsoever.

Fake hate crimes, fake “documentaries” and left-wing hoaxes

Fake “facts” are universally used throughout the twisted realm of Leftism to rile up hatred against intended targets. For example, a shockingly high percentage of so-called “hate crimes” supposedly carried out against blacks, Jews or Muslims eventually turn out to be perpetrated by those very same people against themselves. The huge number of such examples makes them too numerous to list in this article, but here’s a list of just 15 “hate crime hoaxes” that were all reported as true by the left-wing media.
The left-wing media, of course, reports all hate crime hoaxes as true events. But once the perpetrator is discovered to have carried out a hoax, the left-wing media never informs its audience of the hoax. Thus, readers of the NYT, Washington Post, CNN, etc., are left with the utterly false believe that hate crimes are happening everywhere, all the time, and that they’re all genuine hate crimes. In truth, many of them are false flag crimes.
The broadcast industry further underscores all this with staged, fake “documentary” TV shows that are all fabricated with the intention of catapulting the continued propaganda of hate crimes. A&E, for example, desperately tried to stage a KKK documentary, but they were so unsuccessful in finding actual KKK members that they had to script the whole thing and bring their own Nazi props, direct the actors to say “ni##er” on camera, and so on. The entire thing was pure theater… not merely theater for entertainment’s sake, but theater to populate the minds of Leftists with more narrative myths that further the agenda of the Left.
The Left, in other words, has to engineer hatred in order to keep its myths alive. And when there’s not enough actual hatred to be found, they are happy to invoke total fictions to depict the necessary hatred anyway.
That’s why nearly all the so-called “white supremacists” you might see marching around in public rallies these days are actually Leftists pretending to be KKK members. After all, how hard is it, really, to don a white hood and march around with a Nazi poster in your hands, all for the CNN cameras that broadcast the staged video into the minds of Leftists everywhere?

There is real racism, hatred, intolerance and marginalization in America… and it’s mostly coming from the intolerant LEFT

There is real racism in America, however. There are no doubt still pockets of bygone culture where blacks or Jews are despised. But institutional racism against black people is ancient history (except in the realm of science and medicine, where there remains a specific agenda to exterminate blacks, as I’ve publicly exposed). The real, institutionalized intolerance in America today is squarely aimed at Christians, white people and conservatives. That brand of intolerance is openly taught in the schools, encouraged at universities and reinforced through the hatred and intolerance of the left-wing media (Hollywood, late night TV, Netflix shows, etc.)
The assault against “whiteness” has become so intense across America’s universities that some indignant students have begun posting signs on campus that read, “It’s okay to be white.” This brilliant social experiment was pioneered at 4chan, eventually leading to the increasingly popular hashtag #IOTBW.
These signs, naturally, are widely condemned as being “racist.” “Those messages, instead of being ignored, have triggered university administrators and campus leftists into seeing the postings as outbursts of dangerous racism,” reports The Daily Caller. Indeed, the mere affirmation that it’s okay to be the skin color you were born with is now condemned by the deranged Left as a form of hatred all by itself. “HLS [Harvard Law School] will not let that happen here. We live, work, teach, and learn together in a community that is stronger, better, and deeper because of our diversity and because we encourage open, respectful, and constructive discourse,” Harvard Law School dean Marcia L. Sells wrote in a letter to students, apparently oblivious to the obscene contradiction in her own words. To the Left, you see, “diversity” is contingent on the exclusion of whites.
Truly, to the Left, white people are incapable of being diverse, meaning the Left judges people solely by the color of their skin rather than the content of their character.

According to leftists, WHITE people cannot be “diverse” in any meaningful way

As proof of this, Apple’s “vice president of diversity and inclusion” Denise Young Smith was recently forced to resign after daring to proclaim that white people can be diverse. “During a summit in Colombia, Young Smith, a black woman, claimed she likes to focus ‘on everyone’ and that ‘diversity goes beyond race, gender, and sexual orientation.’” reports Breitbart News.
For daring to suggest that diversity is more than skin deep, Smith was forced to profusely apologize to everyone. “I’m sorry,” she said. “More importantly, I want to assure you Apple’s view and our dedication to diversity has not change.” Weeks later, she was forced to resign.
This is precisely how the Left has earned the nickname “libtards.” To such libtards, diversity is exactly skin deep, and any person with white skin has no standing whatsoever. In other words, the Left has become a deranged cabal of intolerant, dangerous racist totalitarians. Their self-deluded tyranny is so off the charts that they now declare people to be unworthy of participating in civil society based solely on the color of their skin — a physical trait that we’re born with, just like biological sex.
An Apple spokesperson underscored the lunacy of the Left’s spiraling intolerance by saying, “We deeply believe that diversity drives innovation,” proclaiming that people should be hired based on whether they are gay, or transgender, or black rather than based on the quality of their ideas and work. This, again, is now a key tenant of the deranged Left: That the worth of a human being is no longer measured by their ideas or contributions. Rather, their entire worth as a human being is now graded solely on how gay they are, how transgender they are, how Muslim they are, or how much the pigment in their skin diverges from whiteness.
The Left has reached the depths of insanity and intolerance, and yet they keep on digging deeper. Having once condemned racist white people for judging blacks by the color of their skin, the lunatic Left has now institutionalized the “correctness” of judging people solely on the color of their skin or their commitment to LGBT values. This, to any rational person, is absolute proof that the Left has become a racist totalitarian regime of insane lunatics and crybullies who are desperately seeking power and control over everyone else.

Action item: Reject the Left’s shallow stupidity, intolerance, hatred and racism

The takeaway from all this? It’s time for all rational people to reject the Left’s skin-deep stupidity, intolerance, hatred and racism. Amazingly, it’s time to call for the Left to stop being intolerant bullies and racists.
This means speaking out against left-wing insanity at every opportunity. Some other actions you can take to help restore sanity across our society include:
  • Stop using left-wing tech services like Google and Facebook
  • Review your own behavior and make sure you are judging people solely by their character, ideas and ethics
  • Vote against Democrats at every election, as they are now universally running on a platform of hatred and intolerance
  • Stop watching left-wing Hollywood movies, TV shows and hate-filled comedians such as Jimmy Kimmel
  • Speak out against schools and universities that teach false anti-science myths (transgenderism) to children
  • Stop purchasing products and brands from companies that donate money to left-wing groups that spew hatred and intolerance
 Delusional Left-wing definitions:
Finally, understand the real terminology of the Left so you can decode their linguistic nonsense.
“Inclusiveness” means advancing the LGBT agenda while insulting straight white men and Christians.
“Tolerance” means agreeing with the Left while calling for the murder of those who oppose your ideas.
“Diversity” means a room full of people with different skin color who all obediently agree on the exact same liberal ideas.
“Equality” means allowing biological male athletes who claim to be women to beat up actual biological women in Mixed Martial Arts competitions.
“Cooperation” means silencing those who refuse to cooperate with your agenda.
“Coexistence” means getting along nicely with those who obediently conform to your beliefs.

Or, better yet, as I previously mentioned in a Natural News post that describes the philosophy of the Left:

HATRED is tolerance

CONFORMITY is diversity

CONSENSUS is fact

HILLARY CLINTON LIFTED OUT OF CAR LIKE A NURSING HOME PATIENT, THE HOBBLES AROUND~CULT FOLLOWERS HARASS INFOWARS REPORTER ASKING QUESTIONS ON PUBLIC SIDEWALK

HILLARY CLINTON LIFTED OUT OF CAR LIKE A NURSING HOME PATIENT, THE HOBBLES AROUND
 Alex Jones and Millie Weaver dissect breaking video from Austin, Texas where Hillary Clinton, yet again, is caught barley being able to hold herself up, indicating some sort of physical ailment. 
 REPORTER MILLIE WEAVER ABUSED BY HILLARY'S SECURITY 
ON PUBLIC SIDEWALK
 Female Reporter Attacked By Angry Mob 
At Hillary Event 
 Infowars reporter Millie Weaver crashes a Hillary Clinton book signing event in Austin, Texas wearing a Bill Clinton rape shirt asking pointed questions about Bill's rape cases, Hillary's lies, and the numerous Clinton corruption scandals. Triggered, Hillary's cult-like fans attack Millie drawing the attention of Clinton's staffers and security who get in Millie face and physically 'manhandle' her.
 Clinton Slams Sessions' Special Council
 Crooked Hillary has lost her mind! She is pushing the narrative that it would be an egregious abuse of power if President Trump were to investigate her for any past wrongdoing. She may not know "What Happened," but she sure won't believe what's in store.
 

Saturday, November 18, 2017

UK: MOTHER CONVERTS TO ISLAM, IS MURDERED BY HER MUSLIM HUSBAND FOR WEARING WESTERN CLOTHES~BLUDGEONED, STABBED, DUMPED LIKE TRASH, SET ON FIRE

UK: MOTHER CONVERTS TO ISLAM, 
IS MURDERED BY HER MUSLIM HUSBAND 
FOR WEARING WESTERN CLOTHES
BLUDGEONED WITH A HAMMER, STABBED,
DUMPED LIKE TRASH, SET ON FIRE
BY ROBERT SPENCER
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 
This is the result of the culture of violence that is created by religious teachings telling men to beat women from whom they “fear disobedience” (Qur’an 4:34). It is also a result of a culture that accepts honor killing. Muslims commit 91 percent of honor killings worldwide. The Palestinian Authority gives pardons or suspended sentences for honor murders. Iraqi women have asked for tougher sentences for Islamic honor murderers, who get off lightly now. Syria in 2009 scrapped a law limiting the length of sentences for honor killings, but “the new law says a man can still benefit from extenuating circumstances in crimes of passion or honour ‘provided he serves a prison term of no less than two years in the case of killing.’” And in 2003 the Jordanian Parliament voted down on Islamic grounds a provision designed to stiffen penalties for honor killings. Al-Jazeera reported that “Islamists and conservatives said the laws violated religious traditions and would destroy families and values.”
Until the encouragement Islamic law gives to honor killing is acknowledged and confronted, more women will suffer.

“Young Mother Who Converted to Islam Murdered in Hammer Attack After Going Back to Western Lifestyle,” by Virginia Hale, Breitbart, November 17, 2017 (thanks to Ken):
A young mother who converted to Islam was brutally murdered by her husband, who barred her from seeing family and friends after she started wearing Western-style clothes again, a British court has heard.
Akshar Ali hit Sinead Wooding with a hammer and stabbed her repeatedly, before dumping in the woods and then torching the mother-of-four’s body, Prosecutor Nicholas Campbell QC told Leeds Crown Court.
Ms Wooding was in the process of converting to Islam and changed her name to Zakirah when she met Mr Ali, 27, who worked on a food stall at Leeds indoor market, according to the Times.
The pair were married at an Islamic ceremony in early 2015, but the jury heard their relationship was “volatile” and violent at times, with arguments over 26-year-old Wooding continued visits to family and friends her husband had “forbidden” her from seeing.
Mr Campbell said Ms Wooding had started wearing Western clothing days before she was killed on May 11 at a party held at the house of her husband’s friend Yasmin Ahmed, who along with Mr Ali, denies murder.
After the couple had an argument, guests heard a bang from the kitchen, at which point Ms Ahmed went to check on them.
She returned, and said Ms Wooding had stumbled into a door but that everything was fine, and a short time afterwards reported to guests that the young mother had left the house.
“In fact Sinead Wooding never left that property alive,” Mr Campbell said, telling the court she was first incapacitated  — suffering a fractured skull after repeated blows to the head with a claw hammer  — and then killed later on, after being “stabbed several times” with a knife.
“If she was conscious at that time of the stabbing she would have been prevented from crying out,” Mr Campbell told the jury, who heard that blood found on Ms Ahmed’s cellar walls and floor was a DNA match for Ms Wooding.
“She was stabbed several times with at least one sharp bladed instrument, almost definitely a knife.”
Her body was allegedly kept in the cellar for two days, then “wrapped up [and] bound with wire” before two people were seen carrying it out at night, by a neighbour….
_______________________________________________________
 Sinead Wooding called police 
before she was murdered
 Sinead Wooding was allegedly murdered by her husband Akshar Ali and friend Yasmin Ahmed on May 13A mother-of-four allegedly murdered by her strict Muslim husband called police the night before she was killed but officers did not visit until three days later.Sinead Wooding, 26, had dialed 999 after her husband Akshar Ali, 27, had banned her from seeing friends and family, on May 13.But by the time police arrived at her marital home in Leeds, Ms Wooding's body had been dumped in a nearby woodland and set alight, Leeds Crown Court heard.Ali and friend Yasmin Ahmed, 27, are accused of stabbing Ms Wooding before bludgeoning her with a claw hammer during a drunken argument at a house party.The Muslim convert's badly disfigured body was found with
 

EUROPE REVOLTS AGAINST E.U.: AUSTRIA TACKLES IMMIGRATION, MERKEL FACES OUSTER

 Europe Revolts Against EU: Austria Tackles Immigration, Merkel Faces Ouster
EUROPE REVOLTS AGAINST E.U.: AUSTRIA TACKLES IMMIGRATION, MERKEL FACES OUSTER
 Globalists hit road block as Europeans reject mass migration
BY DAN LYMAN
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 
The tide is turning in key parts of Europe as the issues of immigration and national security have reached critical mass, prompting political upheaval across the continent sparked by backlash against open borders.

Austria’s Interior Ministry is reporting that applications for asylum have decreased by 43% this year, while the rate of deportations has increased by over 50%.
Applicants admitted to the asylum program in 2016 nearly maxed out Austria’s cap of 37,500 as over 36,000 were accepted. However, only half of this year’s capacity of 35,000 has been filled – a sharp decline.

The future is even more promising for Austria, as two anti-open borders parties – the dominant People’s Party (OVP) and the surging Freedom Party (FPO) – are working to form a new governing coalition, which could see the admission of migrants drop even more sharply.
If the Freedom Party, led by Heinz-Christian Strache, had their way, Austria would move towards zero or negative immigration flow by way of eliminating its ‘asylum’ program, while deporting many of the tens of thousands of migrants who have settled in the country in recent years.
“We do not need an upper limit, nor a halving of the upper limit – we need a zero-migration, in fact, a minus-migration, because of all the illegals and criminals who are in the country,” Strache said earlier this year. “Let us put an end to this policy of Islamization… otherwise we Austrians, we Europeans will come to an abrupt end.”
In Germany, Angela Merkel – upon whom many place the most blame for the flood of millions of illegal immigrants into Europe from Africa and the Middle East – is facing the possibility of either being ejected as Chancellor, or the prospect of a second election after her party’s failure to form a coalition, with immigration quotas being a central issue of contention.
Merkel’s Christian Democratic Union missed a critical deadline yesterday while trying to stitch together a three-party “Jamaica coalition,” which could force new elections – or her ouster.
“It’s not just the chancellor’s fourth term that depends on the success of Jamaica, but her entire political career,” reported Bild ahead of the deadline, calling it Merkel’s “most dangerous night.”
Despite the arbitrary cutoff date, talks are expected to continue into the weekend.
Merkel’s party has slipped to its lowest popularity in the polls in 17 years – while the populist, pro-border control Alternative For Germany (AfD) makes record gains.
“With coalition talks ongoing and Merkel’s position under question, it marks another low point an increasing backlash against her insistence on mass open door migration,” reports Westmonster. “With the anti-mass migration Alternative for Germany on the rise having gone from 0 seats in the Bundestag to over 90, it is clear that the shape of German politics is now changing radically.
Dan Lyman: Facebook | Twitter
 
 

WHY ARE MEN BECOMING SO EFFEMINATE?~ESTROGEN IN FOOD AND WATER, OR GAY AGENDA PERMEATING CULTURE; OR BOTH?

 Why Are Men Becoming so Effeminate?
WHY ARE MEN BECOMING SO EFFEMINATE? 
 We’re losing an entire generation to 
estrogen takeover
BY PAUL JOSEPH WATSON
 
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 
Why are straight men becoming so effeminate?
Men’s testosterone levels in the west have been dropping EVERY YEAR since the 80’s.
Estrogen in food and the water supply as a result of birth control & other contaminants is reaching crisis levels.
What is going on? Is it mainly cultural or environmental?
How can we reverse the loss of an entire generation?

Follow on Twitter:
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/paul.j.watson.71
*********************
Paul Joseph Watson is the editor at large of Infowars.com and Prison Planet.com.


US Government Unveils Global Water Strategy

30 percent of world’s population doesn’t have access to safe drinking water in homes

SEE: https://www.infowars.com/us-government-unveils-global-water-strategy/ 

DROP IN SPERM COUNT DUE TO CHLORINE, FLUORIDE IN WATER SUPPLY

 

 

POWELL, TAYLOR, EL-ERIAN: TRUMP SETS UP ANOTHER CFR/GLOBALIST SWEEP OF TOP FEDERAL RESERVE POSTS

 https://goldprice.com/images/news/Trump_and_the_Federal_Reserve_dollar_index.jpg
POWELL, TAYLOR, EL-ERIAN: TRUMP SETS UP ANOTHER CFR/GLOBALIST SWEEP OF TOP FEDERAL RESERVE POSTS
BY WILLIAM F. JASPER
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 
Hope for seeing any kind of fundamental monetary reform under President Donald Trump is fading fast. Audit the Federal Reserve System (aka, “the Fed”)? Not likely, with a Trump cabinet and economic advisers that hail from Wall Street’s top vulture investment firms and bailout bums (think Goldman Sachs, Rothschild, Carlyle Group, Blackstone, Citi, etc.) and the globalist think tanks (Council on Foreign Relations, Brookings, Peterson Institute).
President Trump’s nomination of Jerome Powell (shown) earlier this month, to replace Janet Yellen as chairman of the Federal Reserve Board, is a signal of plans to continue the same Fed policies that for decades have been undermining our economy and destroying our middle class, during both Democratic and Republican administrations. As The New American’s Bob Adelmann reported on November 3, Powell is a member of the globalist Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) and has become wealthy by toeing the Wall Street establishment line throughout his long career. Janet Yellen is also a member of the same elitist clique that has been running the Federal Reserve since its inception, making the Trump transition at the central bank merely another rotation of CFR musical chairs.
Former congressman Ron Paul commented in a recent column that Trump’s candidates for top Fed slots are merely “more of the same!” Dr. Paul, who has authored and championed “Audit the Fed” bills in Congress over the past three decades, noted that “candidate Trump also promised to support Audit the Fed and even voiced support for returning to the gold standard. But, he has not even uttered the words ‘Audit the Fed,’ or talked about any changes to monetary policy, since the election.”
Powell, who was nominated to the Fed board by President Obama, not only has supported the Bernanke-Yellen “quantitative easing” and other destructive Fed policies, but was a vocal opponent of efforts to audit the Fed. His was a key voice in the establishment choir arguing that the Fed must be allowed to operate in secrecy to preserve its “independence” from political pressure. Likewise, Trump’s Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin backs continued secrecy masquerading as independence. “The Federal Reserve is organized with sufficient independence to conduct monetary policy and open market operations,” Mnuchin said during his confirmation hearings, in response to a question from Senator Bill Nelson, a Florida Democrat. “I endorse the increased transparency we have seen from the Federal Reserve Board over recent years.”
Increased transparency? As we have reported many times previously, the repeated claims of transparency at the Fed do not transparency make. The only transparency worthy of the name is the kind of transparency that can only be accomplished through a genuine, independent, thorough, annual audit -- not a partial, in-house, one-time, fraudulent “audit,” as we have seen in the past.
Prior to Trump’s announcement of Powell as his Fed chair pick, the financial press was quoting unnamed sources inside the administration that pointed to Stanford economist John Brian Taylor as a top contender for the post. Taylor, a Keynesian interventionist, reportedly, is now in the running for the number two spot of vice chairman, which is being vacated by Stanley Fischer (CFR). Taylor is also a CFR member. However, Mohamed El-Erian is yet another insider rumored to head the short list of prospective candidates for vice chair. Like Yellin, Powell, Fischer, and Taylor, Dr. El-Erian is also a member of the CFR, as well as a former deputy director of the International Monetary Fund (IMF). He was co-chief investment officer of Pimco (along with Pimco founder and “Bond King” Bill Gross), the world’s largest bond fund manager. When El-Erian left Pimco in 2014 — following a famous, rancorous blow-up with Gross — the fund had nearly $2 trillion under management. Pimco’s Total Return Fund was also the largest mutual fund in the world. He is now chief economic adviser at Pimco’s parent, Allianz, the German insurance and financial services behemoth. Wolfgang Ischinger, the global head of government affairs at Allianz, is a member of the European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR). Ischinger is also a member of the world government-promoting Trilateral Commission, as is Allianz CEO Oliver Bate. Not surprisingly, Allianz was one of the many globalist corporations that opposed the Brexit, helping crank up “Project Fear,” in a desperate (and failed) effort to derail the British populist effort that successfully campaigned to remove Britain from the European Union. El-Erian penned a piece for Fortune magazine warning that Brexit risked Britain’s economic future.
A Fed run by Powell/Taylor or Powell/El-Erian would continue the same path that we have seen in previous administrations. In January 2014, Trump’s White House predecessor made eerily similar appointments. “President Obama’s plan to name Stanley Fischer as vice chairman of the Federal Reserve was made official on January 10,” we reported at the time, in an article titled, CFR Sweep at Fed: Fischer, Brainard, Powell to Join Yellen.
“At the same time he announced Fischer’s appointment,” we noted, “the president also named Lael Brainard and Jerome Powell to positions as governors on the seven-member Federal Reserve Board. Fed Chairman Janet Yellen and Vice Chairman Fischer also serve as governors.”
“Unremarked in any of the media coverage of the appointments,” we continued, “is the significant fact that all four of these Obama nominations to one of the most powerful institutions on the planet are not only members, but high-level operatives, of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), the premier U.S. ‘think tank’ promoting world government for the past century.”
However, the picture was even worse than that. We went on to note that, “Federal Reserve Board Governor Daniel Tarullo is also a CFR member” and “Stanley Fischer was named this past September to be a 'distinguished fellow in residence' at Pratt House, the CFR’s New York City headquarters.” In addition, we observed that “many additional CFR members and officers have rotated in and out of top positions at the Fed, Treasury, and the big Wall Street firms, such as former Fed Chairmen Paul Volcker and Alan Greenspan, as well as current Federal Reserve Regional Bank Presidents William Dudley (New York City), Dennis P. Lockhart (Atlanta), Richard W. Fisher (Dallas), and current Federal Reserve Board of Governors members Daniel K. Tarullo, Jerome H. Powell ... and Janet Yellen.”
Finally, we reported that “this curious Pratt House influence extends back over the past century to the founding era of the Fed, to such top Wall Street Insiders as Paul Warburg, who was the chief architect of, and propagandist for, the Federal Reserve act, and one of the founding directors of the CFR.” And we listed the former Fed chairmen who were prominent CFR members, from Eugene Meyer on up through Alan Greenspan and beyond.
Although candidate Donald Trump did not make auditing or abolishing the Fed a signature issue of his campaign, as he did with his pledge to “Build the Wall,” to dump NAFTA and the UN Paris climate accord, he did bash the Fed to score points with Tea Party activists and conservative/constitutionalist voters. And he did commit to supporting the commonsense effort — which is also morally compelling — to assure that the robber barons at the Federal Reserve will finally be held accountable through a legitimate audit. It will not be possible to Make America Great Again if that does not happen.

Related articles:
Trump’s Establishment Pick for Fed Chair, Jerome Powell, Won’t Rock the Boat
Team Trump’s Troubling Tentacles: The Goldman Sachs Vampire Squid
Trump’s China Entourage: Heavy With Goldman Sachs, Rothschild, CFR Globalists
Audit the Fed Re-Introduced, With Best Prospects Ever
Your Savings, 401(k), and Retirement Are in Danger
Now, More Than Ever, Time to Audit the Fed
Ben Bernanke Joins Globalist Think Tank
CFR Sweep at Fed: Fischer, Brainard, Powell to Join Yellen
CFR Pushes, Praises Its Own Stanley Fischer for No. 2 Spot at Fed
Former Fed Official “Sorry” for QE Looting of Public to Enrich Wall Street
Bank Bailouts Without End
Globalist McMaster Purges Trump Loyalists, Protects Obamaites
Transparency and The Fed: Transcripts Belie Rhetoric
Some of Trump's Picks Have Troubling Links to Globalism, CFR

PENTAGON FOOTS BILL FOR SOLDIER'S "GENDER TRANSITION" SURGERY AT TAXPAYERS' EXPENSE

PENTAGON FOOTS BILL FOR SOLDIER'S "GENDER TRANSITION" SURGERY AT TAXPAYERS' EXPENSE
BY DAVE BOHON
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 
An active duty U.S. military service member underwent “gender transition” surgery November 14, a procedure that was approved and paid for by the Pentagon, the Defense Department has announced.
The Pentagon said the individual getting the surgery is an infantry soldier who identifies as a woman, and who received his Combat Infantry Badge in Afghanistan in 2003.
Defense Department spokeswoman Dana White told reporters that the surgery was performed in a private hospital in Pennsylvania and was paid for through the soldier's military health coverage. She explained that the procedure was done on the advice of doctors who deemed it medically necessary.
“Military hospitals do not have the surgical expertise to perform this type of surgery, therefore it was conducted in a private hospital,” said White, adding that since the soldier “had already begun a sex-reassignment course of treatment, and the treating doctor deemed this surgery medically necessary, a waiver was approved by the director of the Defense Health Agency.”
In July President Trump overturned President Obama's decision to allow transgender individuals full access to military service, announcing that “the United States government will not accept or allow transgender individuals to serve in any capacity in the U.S. military. Our military must be focused on decisive and overwhelming victory and cannot be burdened with the tremendous medical costs and disruption that transgender in the military would entail.”
In October a federal court put a hold on that ban as lawsuits filed by transgender service members make their way through the courts. However, the ban on federal funding of “gender reassignment” surgeries was left in place, with the caveat that service members who had already begun the “transition” process would be exempted. This exemption allowed the present soldier to have his “gender reassignment” surgery paid for by the government.

CALIFORNIA MOM THREATENED WITH ARREST FOR NOT VACCINATING HER CHILDREN

CALIFORNIA MOM THREATENED WITH ARREST FOR NOT VACCINATING HER CHILDREN
 Could you imagine being threatened by law enforcement authorities over vaccine records as you are waiting with your children for the school bus? 
Alex Jones explains it all.