TRUMP EXPANDS ORDER BANNING U.S. FUNDS
FOR OVERSEAS ABORTION
BY DAVE BOHON
As reported by LifeNews.com,
the executive order signed by Trump on January 23 “stops taxpayer
funding of groups that perform and promote abortions overseas, but does
not stop non-abortion international assistance. The order ensures U.S.
foreign aid will continue to go to health care and humanitarian
relief.... It just will not subsidize abortion overseas.”
Following up on that executive order, on May 15 the Trump
administration announced a major expansion of the Mexico City Policy,
increasing the ban from roughly $600 million in family planning money to
encompass all U.S. international health care, which amounts to nearly
$9 billion. The administration said that under the expanded order,
called officially the Protecting Life in Global Health Assistance plan,
the same amount of funding would still be available globally, but would
only go to groups that promise not to perform abortions as part of their
“family planning” strategies.
In a press release the Trump
administration said that the U.S. “remains deeply committed to
supporting health programs around the world. Foreign NGOs that agree not
to perform or actively promote abortion as a method of family planning
will remain eligible to receive global health assistance through the
standard U.S. Government processes that govern the award of federal
funds.”
The day the president signed the original executive order
re-instating the Mexico City Policy, White House press secretary Sean
Spicer said that Trump “has made it very clear that he’s a pro-life
president. He wants to stand up for all Americans, including the unborn,
and I think the reinstatement of this policy is not just something that
echoes that value, but respects taxpayer funding as well.”
Among those decrying the president's latest move was
pro-abortion U.S. Senator Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H), who said: “We know
that when family planning services and contraceptives are easily
accessible, there are fewer unplanned pregnancies, maternal deaths, and
abortions. Yet the Trump administration has chosen to ignore decades of
research in favor of an ideological crusade that cuts off vital family
planning services.”
By contrast, pro-life groups were quick to praise the
president's actions. “We applaud the Trump administration for not just
stopping the pro-abortion policies of the Obama era, but putting in
place policies that will reverse the destructive and immoral trends of
the last eight years,” said Tony Perkins of the Family Research Council.
“President Trump is keeping faith with the almost 60 percent of Trump
voters who supported him and Vice President Pence based on their
endorsement of the Republican Party’s platform on life and religious
liberty.”
Similarly Marjorie Dannenfelser of the pro-life Susan B.
Anthony List said that “with the implementation of Protecting Life in
Global Health Assistance, we have officially ceased exporting abortion
to foreign nations. No longer will we undermine the pro-life laws and
cultural commitments of other countries by funding organizations like
Marie Stopes International that obsessively promote and perform
abortion.”
Lila Rose of the pro-life group Live Action challenged
that with the latest Trump order, “it’s time for Congress to finish the
job here in the United States and stop the hundreds of millions of tax
dollars going to the biggest abortion chain in America, Planned
Parenthood. The federal government’s most important duty is to protect
human life, so it is unthinkable that our tax dollars fund a corporation
that destroys the lives of over 320,000 pre-born children each year
right here at home.”
Bill Hahn, vice president of communications for the liberty-minded
John Birch Society, said that “stopping the funding for abortions
anywhere is a great first step.” He added, “Let’s take the next step of
stopping the abortion movement in the U.S., as well as stopping any
federal dollars from being used as foreign aid for any reason. There is
nothing in the Constitution authorizing foreign aid, but there are
plenty of reasons to protect life.”