Translate

Sunday, February 12, 2017

U.C. BERKELEY: AMERICAN FASCISM

 
U.C. BERKELEY: AMERICAN FASCISM 
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 
Berkeley Unveils the New, Dangerous Logic of the Deranged Left:
If They Disagree With You, They have the Moral Right to KILL You Before You can Speak
Wednesday, February 8th, 2017
by: Mike Adams

(Natural News) Following the UC Berkeley violence aimed at murdering gay conservative speaker Milo Yiannopoulos, the UC Berkeley newspaper has published a series of columns that unveil the dangerous new logic of the deranged Left: If they disagree with you, they are fully justified in KILLING you in order to prevent you from speaking.

In a series of essays titled “Violence as Self-Defense,” the obviously deranged Berkeley students argue that because speech they don’t like is a form of violence in their fragile snowflake minds, they have the moral right — even the obligation — to murder people who engage in that speech. (RELATED: Follow more news about liberal insanity at our new site Libtards.news)

This has now become the actual argument of the unhinged Left. Here’s the tortured process by which they justify all this:

Step 1) DEMONIZE political opponents as “Nazis” by constantly lying about them until the lies are repeated sufficiently enough to be accepted as “truth” by your peers.

Step 2) CHARACTERIZE speech from your political opponents as “violence.” Claim that any speech you don’t like is a form of violence itself. (Break down into tears at the sight of words you don’t like, and convulse with self-induced paranoia to make your victimhood seem convincing.)

Step 3) COMMIT ACTUAL VIOLENCE against your political opponents, insisting that because their speech is “violence” in your opinion, they deserve to be killed.

Step 4) JUSTIFY IT ALL by claiming you’re the victim and had to kill the Nazis out of self-defense. Vote Democrat and continue the cycle of insanity and violence while advocating genocide against whites, conservatives, Jews or whatever group you don’t like at the moment.

Then use federal funds to hire more insanely liberal college professors to teach yet more students the same twisted logic. Rinse and repeat, all while instantly labeling anyone who disagrees with you a “racist” or “homophobe,” even if they’re gay.

“The first op-ed, written by UC Berkeley alumna Nisa Dang, lectured critics of the riots to ‘check their privilege.’ Dang claimed that Yiannopoulos’s views amount to “violence,” and that in turn legitimized violence against them,” reports the Daily Caller.

Even daring to criticize the deranged logic of “pre-emptive violence” by Leftists is also defined as an act of violence that would justify them killing you first, according to Berkeley students.

“Criticisms of the riots are not just wrong, in her opinion, but also constitute ‘violent acts’ against minority students,” writes the Daily Caller. “She also implied in her piece that Milo and his supporters should be killed.”

“UC Berkeley, a public campus once celebrated as the birthplace of the Free Speech Movement of the 1960s, now apparently celebrates the use of violence to suppress free speech and violate the civil right rights of guest speakers and fellow students,” adds Breitbart.com, which also writes:

One essay, by Berkeley student Josh Hardman, celebrates the “plurality of tactics,” including violence, that suppressed Milo’s speech… He adds that violence in the service of shutting down violence may not really deserve to be classified as “violence” at all.
Berkeley alumna Nisa Dang warns them to “check” their “privilege.” She argues that “no protest is nonviolent.” Students were “compelled” to protest violently, she says, because Milo’s words make students feel unsafe, and therefore call for pre-emptive action: “If I know that you are planning to attack me, I’ll do all I can to throw the first punch.” Adding that “police are violent agents of the state,” she claims that their very presence — limited as it was at the Milo event — “creates an atmosphere that perpetuates violence on community members.” She then mocks Milo for not facing whatever violence the rioters had in store — “To Milo: I’m sorry that you were too scared to stand your ground” — and hints that he ought to be murdered by those who survived genocides by “killing Nazis and people just like them.”

Left-wing derangement crosses threshold into dangerous advocacy of actual genocide

What Berkeley’s violence-promoting Leftists don’t seem to realize is that by arguing for this “violence as self-defense” twisted logic, they have just invoked the same twisted reasoning of every genocidal regime in world history.

Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot and even Hitler all justified their violence as a form of “self-defense” against aggressors who they depicted as destroying their society. Adolf Hitler’s genocide against the Jews was supported with the logic that their “views” were a threat to German society and had to be silenced through the prolific use of concentration camps and gas chambers — things the radical Berkeley Left would now openly advocate against conservatives.

Mao’s communist revolution in China, which saw communists executing academics in the streets, was also justified by claiming that academics were a threat to the state and therefore had to be “pre-emptively executed” for the good of society.

Berkeley students now spout the same logic as the world’s most murderous tyrants, apparently having learned nothing about world history since Berkeley doesn’t provide an actual education anymore. Instead, the school is an indoctrination center for zombie Leftists who are being trained to think like communist revolutionaries rather than patriotic Americans.

Leftists push America ever closer to kinetic civil war

Where is all this headed? It looks headed for kinetic civil war. Now that the deranged Left has decided that mass violence is justified to silence all political enemies, watch for the journo-terrorism left-wing media to keep pushing the uprising and violence as aggressively as possible. They are quite literally attempting to whip up the gullible youth into a mindless “zombie rage” uprising to accomplish three things:

Goal #1) Bait President Trump into cracking down on the violent riots, then claim Trump is anti-freedom because all the violent rioters were just “peaceful protesters.” (Yeah, right.)

Goal #2) Cause so much mayhem and chaos that the United States becomes “ungovernable” by any President, then point to Trump in four years and proclaim, “He didn’t accomplish ANYTHING!”

Goal #3) Build the uprising toward the possible goal of actually staging a massive communist takeover of the country. This effort will fail, of course, but the deranged Leftists don’t realize that yet, so they might try it.

Left-wing media engaged in outright “journo-terrorism”

Keep in mind that the mainstream media is actively engaged in pushing these three outcome goals by broadcasting daily fake news propaganda to whip up even more hatred toward President Trump and his administration. That’s why I call them “journo-terrorists” — they are engaged in a deliberate form of psychological terrorism that now underpins the new “philosophy of violence” being openly espoused by the deranged Left (as clearly demonstrated at Berkeley).

The left-wing media, in other words, is the FUEL behind the left-wing violence that continues to escalate. Hatred is their ally, and they keep pushing lies about Trump to maximize the hatred that leads to violence and acts of terrorism against America. This is also why I have thoughtfully argued that President Trump may need to declare a national emergency and quite literally seize the most radical left-wing media outlets (CNN, WashPost, NYT) for a short period of time to halt the cycle of disinfo(rmation), hatred and violence that’s being used by the Left to try to destroy America from within.

The truly irresponsible “free speech” being practiced in America today is not coming from Milo; it’s coming from the journo-terrorists at CNN who are ginning up what can best be called an enraged, hate-filled zombie left-wing army of obedient soldiers to carry out their violence and terrorism against all patriotic Americans.

What can YOU do about all this? Stand up for free speech and keep your powder dry

I always aim to offer practical solutions in my analysis articles, and the strategy for navigating all this is obvious: Keep supporting real free speech (i.e. from Milo Yiannopoulos and everyone else who’s outspoken) while making sure you are ready for the unleashing of kinetic civil war by the deranged left.

Because when the day comes that they say YOUR speech is a form of violence that they must stop by killing you in advance, it is truly your rightful, moral and ethical duty to defend your life using kinetic force to stop any immediate threat of violence. In other words, if they are coming at you with a spiked baseball bat, screaming something like, “YOUR WORDS ARE VIOLENT!” then you may have to invoke the laws of physics, momentum and kinetic energy to put them down.

Just make sure you have plenty of tools ready for your own defense because history has shown that insanely deranged Leftists, just like zombies, always travel in groups. When they come to kill you for your political views, you don’t want to rely on just one tool (or one magazine).

What the deranged Left is about to discover in a very disturbing way is that trying to stage a murderous uprising in a nation with the Second Amendment won’t work out very well. While other communist uprisings and left-wing revolts have achieved success throughout history, every single one of them was preceded by the disarmament of the citizens (for all the obvious reasons).

It turns out that this new logic of the insane Left — “We can kill you because we don’t like your views” — is now the greatest argument ever made for supporting the Second Amendment. If you aren’t yet a gun rights supporter, you should be!

As long as We the People maintain our Second Amendment rights, we are capable of defending ourselves against the deranged violence of the zombie Left, who are now openly admitting their desire is to kill you before you can speak. Let all that sink in a bit, then go out and complete your concealed carry training.

Be safe. The zombie hoards have been unleashed at Berkeley. And they already have the internal justification they need to murder you while claiming they are the victims. Read CivilWar.news to stay informed, and check out Conservative.news for daily updates on all political matters.

http://www.naturalnews.com/2017-02-08-berkeley-unveils-the-new-dangerous-logic-of-the-deranged-left-if-they-disagree-with-you-they-have-right-to-kill-you.html

Also read this important story: Insightful columnist “nails it” with explanation of why the Left is so hateful, deranged and dangerous.
 

"I'LL SEE YOU IN COURT": GREATEST TRUMP TWEETS OF THE WEEK

"I'LL SEE YOU IN COURT": 
GREATEST TRUMP TWEETS OF THE WEEK 
MILLIE WEAVER OF INFOWARS REPORTS:
 

TRUMP OPENS BORDER FOR CHRISTIAN REFUGEES, BUT LEFT IGNORES

 Trump Opens Border For Christian Refugees, But Left Ignores
TRUMP OPENS BORDER FOR CHRISTIAN REFUGEES, BUT LEFT IGNORES 
 Trump allows refugees most persecuted 
over religious beliefs to enter US
BY CLIFFORD CUNNINHAM
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 
There is a “blind spot” in Western countries concerning the persecution of Christians around the world, advocates said while noting Christians are the most persecuting religious group on the planet.
According to a report from Open Doors, a nonprofit organization that aids Christians facing persecution around the world, approximately 322 Christians are killed, 214 churches or properties owned by Christians are destroyed, and 772 acts of violence are carried out against Christians each month.
“No person or group should live in fear of being killed, tortured or oppressed because of their religious beliefs,” said Paul Coleman, deputy director of the Alliance Defending Freedom International. “By all accounts Christians are the most persecuted group on the planet.”

In addition to a genocidal campaign waged against them by ISIS in Syria and Iraq, Coptic Christians face regular discrimination and violent terrorist attacks in Egypt.
Andrew Doran, vice president of In Defense of Christians, argued the backlash against the provision in President Donald Trump’s executive order granting exceptions for refugees who belong to persecuted religions minorities stemmed from a belief in the West that Christians are oppressors unworthy of special consideration.
“Christians in the West have been somehow identified as the oppressor class, and that view seems to be extended to Christians in the Middle East,” he said. “But the fact is that couldn’t be further from the truth.”
“Whether someone is Muslim, Yazidi, Jewish, Christian or atheist, they should be given priority if they’re facing persecution, and certainly that would be so where there’s a finding of genocide.”
A recent survey from Rasmussen demonstrated more Democrats believe that Muslims face more discrimination in the United States than Christians do in Muslim-majority countries.
“Fifty-six percent (56%) of Democrats, however, believe most Muslims in this country are mistreated, a view shared by only 22% of Republicans and 39% of voters not affiliated with either major party. Fewer Democrats (47%) think most Christians are mistreated in the Islamic world, compared to 76% of GOP voters and 64% of unaffiliated.”
Despite then-Secretary of State John Kerry’s assertion that Christians in the Middle East were facing genocide at the hands of ISIS, less than one-half of one percent of the 19,000 Syrian refugees admitted during President Obama’s administration were Christians.
“They’ve been horribly treated. Do you know if you were a Christian in Syria, it was impossible, at least very tough, to get into the United States,” said President Trump during an interview with the Christian Broadcasting Network last month. “If you were a Muslim, you could come in, but if you were a Christian, it was almost impossible, and the reason that was so unfair, everybody was persecuted in all fairness, but they were chopping off the heads of everybody, but more so the Christians.”
“And I thought it was very, very unfair. So we are going to help them.”
Advocates praised the provision of President Trump’s order granting special admission status for those persecuted for their religious beliefs, noting is was more than the Obama administration had done.
“I think the case could be made that Donald Trump did more in one afternoon than President Obama did over the last six years,” Dolan said.

 

Saturday, February 11, 2017

STATE DEPARTMENT REVOLTS AGAINST TRUMP FOR SECURING BORDER

 http://truthfeed.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/state-department-trump-009-01-800x416.jpg
 STATE DEPARTMENT REVOLTS AGAINST TRUMP 
FOR SECURING BORDER
 Clinton cronies at State DOUBLED the inflow 
of Muslim migrants after 9th Circuit ruling
BY JEROME R. CORSI
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 
WASHINGTON, D.C. – The State Department is in open revolt against the White House and Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, inviting President Donald Trump to clean house.
For many Americans, Trump, made famous for his “You’re Fired” approach to his “Apprentice” reality TV show, has just been given a once-in-a-lifetime repeat performance of that line now that he is president.
Those federal employees feeling secure that civil service rules assure them permanent State Department employment in DC despite their open opposition to Trump’s foreign policies might be well advised to start thinking twice about how well they could adapt to a presidential reassignment to a remote outpost in Alaska, or at the southernmost tip of the United States in Texas, along the Mexican border.

This week a State Department “dissent channel” memo surfaced, objecting to President Trump’s Executive Order issued Jan. 27, temporarily suspending travel for 90 days from Syria, Iraq, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen. By Friday over 1,000 State Department employees had put their signatures to the resistance statement.
“A policy which closes our doors to over 200 million legitimate travelers in the hopes of preventing a small number of travelers who intend to harm Americans from using the visa system to enter the US will not achieve its aim of making our country safer,” the State Department dissent memo reads, in language that clearly asserts the bureaucrats in the State Department have a superior lock on foreign policy wisdom than does the president.
Given Trump’s history as a highly successful multi-billionaire CEO, dissenting State Department employees are making a dangerous bet expressing their opinion that they know better than their boss.
The New York Times reported that the State Department currently has 7,600 Foreign Service officers and 11,000 civil servants. This means some 5% (the 1,000 signing the dissent memorandum) of current State Department employees are in open revolt against the newly-inaugurated Chief Executive of the US.
The State Department’s open revolt invites Secretary Tillerson to put under scrutiny for discipline, reassignment, and/or outright dismissal the 1,000 employees signing the dissent memo.
This, plus the “mass exodus” of top State Department policy and management officials that resigned in response to Trump’s election and his selection of Tillerson to be secretary of state, gives President Trump and Secretary Tillerson an extraordinary opportunity to “clean house” with a decision to fire for insubordination all State Department policy officials that signed the dissent memorandum expressing their open disdain for the border security objectives central to Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign.
The depth of the State Department revolt is not fully appreciated until we examine the extent to which leftist State Department officials went to flood into the US a disproportionately large number of refugees from the seven terror-supporting countries specified in the Trump executive order – acting almost as if it were the State Department’s job to get as many refugees into the Untied States as possible from these seven terror-supporting countries before the window closed.
The Washington Times has reported the State Dept. has more than doubled the refugee inflow from the seven terror-prone nations since U.S. District Court Judge James Robart in Seattle imposed a temporary restraining order on the enforcement of President Trump’s executive order imposing the temporary travel ban.
“A staggering 77 percent of the 1,100 refugees let in since Judge James L. Robart’s Feb. 3 order have been from the seven suspect countries. Nearly a third are from Syria alone — a country that President Trump has ordered be banned altogether from the refugee program,” the Washington Times noted. “Another 21 percent are from Iraq. By contrast, in the two weeks before Judge Robart’s order, just 9 percent of refugees were from Syria and 6 percent were from Iraq.”
But the State Department open rebellion against President Trump does not stop there.
The ConservativeTreeHouse.com argued that a CNN report on Thursday claiming the Russians were trying to influence the election in France so as to insure a win for anti-globalist Marine Le Pen, president of the National Front – a strong opponent of the European Union with a Trump-like “France First” message.
“In essence, CNN -and by extension the progressive State Department officials remaining within the shadow deep state construct- is trying to influence the French Presidential Race,” the ConservativeTreeHouse.com story stressed.  “Blaming the Russians in advance is an attempt to weaken Marine Le Pen.”
The article went on to comment only difference between November 2016 and today is that this time CNN is attempting to get out ahead of an election rather than inventing the back-story “the Russians did it” to explain why Hillary Clinton lost an election her leftist supporters presumed she had won from the moment she declared her candidacy for president.
Predictably, Twitter on Friday morning in the aftermath of the Ninth Circuit’s Court of Appeals decision to leave Judge Robart’s decision in place has nothing about the issue trending, despite numerous tweets being posted by Americans angry at the appellate court’s decision and demanding that President Trump clean house at the State Department.



NEW KATY PERRY SONG ENCOURAGES ANTI TRUMP RIOTS

 New Katy Perry Song Encourages Anti-Trump Riots
 NEW KATY PERRY SONG ENCOURAGES 
ANTI TRUMP RIOTS
 Pop culture re-brands civil unrest 
to cash in on divided America
BY PAUL JOSEPH WATSON
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 
The lyrics to a new Katy Perry song timed to coincide with her re-branding as an anti-Trump “activist” includes a line that openly encourages her fans to riot.
Released earlier today, the pop star’s Chained to the Rhythm track features lyrics by reggae singer Skip Marley that include the lines, “We’re stumbling, we’re crumbling, and we’re about to riot / They woke up, they woke up the lions.”
Elsewhere, the lyrics make reference to “liars” and the “empire,” clearly placing it in a political context.
“Even though Skip is the one who seems to slyly diss the President, many drew attention to how it’s still Katy’s song, and how her lyrics could also be related to the current political climate,” reports Hollywood Life.
Perry, who now considers herself an “activist” according to her Twitter bio (no doubt a genuine lifestyle choice and not just an avaricious form of virtue signaling to make more money), endorsed Hillary Clinton multiple times and headlined a concert in her honor back in November.
Following Donald Trump’s victory, she took to Twitter to call for a “revolution,” asking people to “rise up”.
As part of her new role as the Che Guevara of pop music, Perry also attended last month’s anti-Trump “women’s march” in DC.
After releasing her new song, Perry proclaimed the new era of “purposeful pop”.
Fans reacted to Perry’s new song by thanking her for taking on Trump.
“The anthem for our revolution!” wrote one.
“Katy Perry’s #ChainedToTheRhythm is the 1st major pop release that feels influenced by Trump era,” added another.
It is rumored that Perry will perform the new song during an appearance at the Grammys this Sunday.
Other anti-Trump pop stars have also jumped on the bandwagon in recent weeks. During the “women’s march,” which was organized by a supporter of sharia law, Madonna gave a speech in which she said she had “thought an awful lot about blowing up the White House”.

While it’s unlikely that Perry’s fans are likely to organize a mass riot any time soon, her new song highlights how popular culture is re-branding civil unrest as a trendy form of virtue signaling in order to cash in on the deep political divisions that plague America.
There have been numerous riots since Trump won the presidency, including immediately after the election, at the inauguration, more violent unrest in response to his travel ban policy, as well as the shocking scenes at Berkeley last week when attendees of a Milo Yiannopoulos event were pepper sprayed and beaten by Antifa thugs.
While the dominant culture desperately tries to portray itself as the anti-establishment counter-culture, the only real counter-culture is the new brand of conservatism that helped sweep Trump to victory in the first place.
"SOLD HER SOUL TO THE DEVIL" PERRY CALLS HER FANS "ZOMBIES" AND LOVES IT
"CHAINED TO THE RHYTHM" SONG

 

THE ISLAMIC STATE CHOPS OFF CHILDREN'S HANDS FOR REFUSING TO EXECUTE PRISONERS

THE ISLAMIC STATE CHOPS OFF CHILDREN'S HANDS FOR REFUSING TO EXECUTE PRISONERS
BY CHRISTINE WILLIAMS
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 
"The two boys, aged between 10 and 12, were ordered to execute the captives in front of their families…lads refused and were punished for failing to follow orders from the caliphate."
Children do not escape the cruelty of Islamic State jihadists. Some horrific examples (which may be disturbing to some people):
  • A one-year-old Yazidi baby was beaten in front of his mother until she gave in to all of the Islamic State jihadi’s sex demands.
  • A baby was blown up as part of an Islamic State explosive training exercise.
  • 74 children were executed by the Islamic State for “crimes” that included refusal to fast.
  • Children are also being raped, tortured, beheaded, crucified and buried alive.

“ISIS sickos chop off kids’ HANDS for ‘refusing to execute prisoners'”, By Tom Rawle, Daily Star, February 3, 2017:
The two boys, aged between 10 and 12, were ordered to execute the captives in front of their families.
Yet the lads refused and were punished for failing to follow orders from the caliphate.
A source told Al-Sumaria news in Iraq: “The Islamic State’s leaders issued orders to train a group of children on fighting in the group’s camps in Nables neighborhood, in the western side of Nineveh.
“Meanwhile, members of the Islamic State terrorist group amputated the hands of two children, for refusing to carry out the execution sentence on two civilians in front of their families.”
Public amputations are common in ISIS-run settlements.
Sickening images and video have emerged in recent months showing hundreds gathering around to see such spectacles.
The horrifying news comes days after ISIS’ chief executioner was killed by mystery death squads in the city of Mosul.
Abu Sayyaf is said to have butchered more than 100 captives.
Yet security sources have now confirmed the brutal killer had been stabbed to death by the squad of assassins…..

QUEBEC IMAM PRAYS: "O ALLAH, DESTROY THE ACCURSED JEWS...O ALLAH, KILL THEM ONE BY ONE"

 
QUEBEC IMAM PRAYS: 
"O ALLAH, DESTROY THE ACCURSED JEWS...
O ALLAH, KILL THEM ONE BY ONE" 
BY CHRISTINE WILLIAMS
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 
Those are among the regular prayers being recited at Al Andalous Islamic Center in Montreal by Imam Sayed AlGhitawi. He also pleaded with “Allah to support the mujahideen (Muslims who engage in jihad) in Palestine and to inflict total destruction on the Jews.”
There are others like him who are being permitted in Canada to spread messages of violence and conquest, while Canada is pushing through another anti-Islamophobia motion in Parliament that takes aim at free speech, specifically at any criticism of Islam. ACT for Canada published an important report on the motions, including our coverage at Jihad Watch; see here.
AlGhitawi’s statements are not singular. In August, Mazin AbdulAdhim, a prominent imam of Iraqi descent in London, Ontario, “encouraged Muslims to wake up from the illusion that the Western governments represent them, to disavow democracy, to follow the true teachings of Islam, and to work together for re-establishing the Islamic State – the Caliphate.”
Dr. Abdullah Hakim Quick, who “served as a special advisor to the Toronto Board of Education,” stated that “in Islam gays should be executed” and that “homosexuality goes with Zionism.”
Last February, the Alberta Islamic Welfare Association hosted Syrian refugees and their families at a get-together with members of the Edmonton Muslim community and Imam Shaban Sherif Mady of a Muslim congregation in Edmonton. During prayer with the refugees, Imam Mady prayed
O Allah! Strengthen the mujahideen [jihad fighters in the path of Allah] everywhere, make their hearts firm and strong, let them hit their targets, give them victory over their enemies.
Some years ago, Toronto area Imam Said Rageah at the Abu Huraira Centre called on Allah to “destroy the enemies of Islam from within” and he called upon God to “damn the infidels.”
It has also been found that “Islamic schools, mosques in Canada are filled with extremist literature.”

“Quebec Imam prays for the annihilation of the Jews”, by Jonathan Halevi, CIJ News, February 8, 2017:
At the end of his sermons at Al Andalous Islamic Center in Montreal, Quebec Imam Sayed AlGhitawi (سيد الغتاوي) recited supplications to Allah to support the mujahideen (Muslims who engage in jihad) in Palestine and to inflict total destruction on the Jews….
The following are excerpts from Sayed AlGhitawi’s supplications in 2014:
O Allah, give victory to our brothers who engage in Jihad for Your sake in everywhere, O Lord of the Worlds
O Allah, give victory to our brothers who engage in Jihad in Palestine
O Allah, connect to their hearts
O Allah, make their feet firm
O Allah, make their feet firm
O Allah, give them victory over their enemy
O Allah, destroy the accursed Jews
O Allah, show us the black day you inflict on them
O Allah, show us the wonders of your power and ability inflicted on them, O the most Merciful
O Allah, show us how you do to them what you did to [the peoples] of ʿĀd and Thamud [ancient peoples that perished by Allah because they didn’t heed the warnings of the prophets]
O Allah, show us how you do them what you did to [the people] of ʿĀd and Thamud
O Allah, rain down on them rain of stones made of Sigil stones, O Lord of the Worlds
O Allah, rain down on them rain of stones made of Sigil stones, O the most Merciful
O Allah, make their children orphans and their women widows…
O Allah, give victory to our brothers who engage in Jihad in Palestine, O Lord of the Worlds…
O Allah, destroy the accursed Jews
O Allah, show us the black day you inflict on them
O Allah, show us the wonders of your power and ability inflicted on them, O the most Merciful
Shook the ground beneath their feet
O Allah, kill them one by one
O Lord, don’t leave any of them [alive]

EU BOSS SAYS BREXIT & TRUMP ARE "POLITICS OF PARANOIA", SHOULD SET ALARM BELLS RINGING ACROSS WEST

 
EU BOSS SAYS BREXIT & TRUMP ARE 
"POLITICS OF PARANOIA", 
SHOULD SET ALARM BELLS RINGING ACROSS WEST 
BY CHRISTINE WILLIAMS
 
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 
“Europe is on the road to war,” according to European Commission first vice-president Frans Timmermans, who has declaraed that citizens have to “fight against the ‘politics of paranoia’ and the ‘disruptive forces of xenophobia, intolerance and illiberalism.’”
He goes on:
EUROPE must not repeat the mistakes of its violent and bloody past by embracing populism and nationalism as a ‘breath of fresh air.’
In other words, as he disregards the current global realities of Islamic supremacism and jihad, Timmermans is accusing every European victim of jihad attacks and the rampant sex attacks and surging crimes committed by Muslim migrants of paranoia. He’s also indirectly accusing the persecuted Church and infidels of other religious minorities, and even the 11 million Muslims murdered by their coreligionists since 1948, of paranoia. He grossly underestimates the global jihad threat, the biggest threat to human rights and peace today. The nation of Israel is also victimized by jihad terror, so perhaps it, too, can be accused by Timmermans of “nationalism” and “paranoia.” Let’s not forget the victims of 9/11 on the list of the paranoid, in Timmermans’ bizarre reasoning, along with many others victims of jihad attack. Timmermans also completely ignores Islamic history as he slams Brexit, Trump and Europe’s own history.
The Timmermans of the world, and there are many, call on Europe and the entire West to surrender to Islamic supremacists and jihadists so as to avoid labels of paranoia, xenophobia and intolerance.
The only threat of destruction Europe faces is in living in its past, seeing all nationalism through the prism of World War II’s malignant nationalism, and forgetting the fine efforts of those (of every race and religion) who fought for human rights and democratic rule. That includes my own Chinese grandfather, who fought for the Brits in Trinidad in World War I.

“‘Europe is on ROAD TO WAR’ EU boss in shocking attack on Brexit and rising nationalism”, by Simon Osborne, Express, February 10, 2017:
European Commission first vice-president Frans Timmermans said citizens had to fight against the ‘politics of paranoia’ and the ‘disruptive forces of xenophobia, intolerance and illiberalism’.
And he said Brexit and the Donald Trump’s shock rise to power in the US should set alarm bells ringing across the West.
In a keynote speech to the Future Force Conference he said the European Union was not just Brussels but an eco-system of many different languages, cultures and traditions.
He said: “Europe is a union of unlikely allies. If you think nationalism is a welcome breath of fresh air, think again: It is the road to war.
“French and Germans, Dutch and Belgians, Danes and Swedes, French and English, Hungarians and Romanians, Bulgarians and Greeks all fought each other on the bloody timeline of European history.
“Three generations of French and German young men had slaughtered each other in three wars within living memory.
“But history can surprise us. Sometimes for the better. Twelve years later, 60 years ago next month, these two countries signed the Treaty of Rome, along with four other European nations. From arch enemies, to best buddies. They founded the most successful peace project in human history.”
Mr Timmermans warned recent political upheavals threatened to jeopardise the hard-earned peace across the block.
He said: “Right here, on our own doorstep, our fundamental values are under threat.
“In Europe, we see the return of the politics of paranoia. Fuelled by alternative facts in Internet echo chambers, the disruptive forces of xenophobia, intolerance, il-liberalism and nationalism and are on the march.
“New parties are peddling old, dangerous ideas.
“Brexit, Turkey, Poland, Hungary and even in the Western Balkans we see the return of fault lines in Europe. Not an iron curtain of machine guns and minefields, but a barrier of the mind, between inclusion and exclusion, between open and closed societies.”
Mr Timmermans accused Russia of trying to challenge the European order and feared President Vladimir Putin had too much power.
He told the conference: “We see hybrid warfare, now in Ukraine. Will the Baltic states be next? We see the return of the menace of nuclear war. Russia has less checks and balances than the Soviet Union had. President Putin enjoys more unrestrained power, than Nikita Khrushchev ever did…..

CIVIL ASSET FORFEITURE: RUINING LIVES, WHILE FAILING TO STOP CRIME

 
CIVIL ASSET FORFEITURE: 
RUINING LIVES, WHILE FAILING TO STOP CRIME
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 
Yesterday, President Trump met with the National Sheriff’s Association at the White House.  Like so many Trump comments, this one took a strange turn when Trump (jokingly or not) threatened to “destroy the career” of a Texas state Senator:
During the meeting, Rockwall County, Texas, Sheriff Harold Eavenson told President Trump about a piece of asset forfeiture legislation he believes would aid Mexican drug cartels…here’s the full conversation:
Eavenson:  “There’s a state senator in Texas that was talking about legislation to require conviction before we could receive that forfeiture money.”
Trump:  “Do you believe that?”
Eavenson:  “And I told him that the cartel would build a monument to him in Mexico if he could get that legislation passed.”
Trump:  “Who is that state senator? I want to hear his name. We’ll destroy his career…”
Though the major point of conversation was about Trump’s threat to a state legislator, the bigger story should be the implicit support Trump gave to civil asset forfeiture, whether he realized it or not.  And if you are not aware what civil asset forfeiture is, it is (surprisingly) something that is agreed by both sides of the aisle to be unjust and unconstitutional, and rightfully so.
Civil asset forfeiture is defined by Wikipedia as “a controversial legal process in which law enforcement officers take assets from persons suspected of involvement with crime or illegal activity without necessarily charging the owners with wrongdoing.”  The practice is commonplace in the war on drugs, but it can be extended to almost anything.
What it means is that the government can essentially seize any of your assets it can find (be it in a bank account, or cash/gold/whatever you have in a safe or under the mattress), label them a part of a “criminal investigation,” and keep them indefinitely, without sufficient due process for the citizen to challenge the seizures, and whether you are ultimately charged with a crime or not.
Martin Armstrong of Armstrong Economics explains how police have every reason to seize assets, largely because these civil asset forfeitures are literally funding police departments:
Between 1989 and 2010, U.S. attorneys seized an estimated $12.6 billion in asset forfeiture cases. The growth rate during that time averaged +19.4% annually. In 2010 alone, the value of assets seized grew by +52.8% from 2009 and was six times greater than the total for 1989. Then by 2014, that number had ballooned to roughly $4.5 billion for the year, making this 35% of the entire number of assets collected from 1989 to 2010 in a single year. According to the FBI, the total amount of goods stolen by criminals in 2014 burglary offenses suffered an estimated $3.9 billion in property losses. This means that the police are now taking more assets than the criminals.
The police have been violating the laws to confiscate assets all over the country. A scathing report on California warns of pervasive abuse by police to rob the people without proving that any crime occurred. Even Eric Holder came out in January suggesting reform because of the widespread abuse of the civil asset forfeiture laws by police.
Bloomberg News has reported now that Stop-and-Seize authority is turning the Police Into Self-Funding Gangs. They are simply confiscating money all under the abuse of this civil asset forfeiture where they do not have to prove you did anything.
Prosecutors are now instructing police on how to confiscate money within the grey area of the law.
A class action lawsuit was filed against Washington DC where police were robbing people for as little as having $100 in their pocket.  This is getting really out of hand and it has indeed converted police into legal criminals or “gangs” as Bloomberg News calls them.
And Mike Krieger of Liberty Blitzkreig even cites the Huffington Post, of all places, which detailed the case of two bakers who did not commit any crime, but had their assets (and lives) ruined by the IRS, because they were able to legally seize the business’s assets by just believing that they may have been engaging in criminal activity, with absolutely no evidence to support their claim:
But the IRS refused to believe Vocatura’s Bakery was operating on the up and up. Agents said the business raised red flags because of a series of cash deposits in sums under $10,000, the amount at which banks are required to report transactions to the federal government. They said this behavior was consistent with a crime known as structuring, which the IRS defines as making calculated financial transactions in order to skirt reporting requirements. The agents had no evidence of other wrongdoing, but thanks to a controversial law enforcement tool known as civil asset forfeiture, they didn’t need any to seize every penny in the Vocaturas’ bank account: $68,382.22.
Under the practice of civil forfeiture, authorities can move to permanently take property they suspect of being linked to criminal activity, without obtaining a conviction — and, in cases like the Vocaturas’, without even charging the owner with a crime.
For the past three years, the brothers have been fighting to get their money back, maintaining they’d done nothing wrong. The IRS has responded by subjecting David, 53, and his brother Larry, 69, to a series of increasingly aggressive legal maneuvers — including threats of significant prison time and additional fines — in an attempt to strong-arm them into permanently forfeiting their assets.
Hours after the suit was filed, the IRS said it would finally give the Vocaturas their money back. But the prosecutor didn’t drop the case. Instead, he now plans to mount an expansive investigation into the bakery’s finances, looking for a reason to bring criminal charges against the brothers.
It was just the latest twist in a protracted legal battle that has called into question some of the government’s favorite — and most problematic —methods of taking people’s money.
The practice is just as bad as it sounds – with the original intent being to stop big time drug dealers from recouping their assets, the practice has devolved into police and agencies of all types funding their departments by stealing the assets of civilians, whether they were obtained criminally or not.  This is also not a partisan trend, and as Michael Armstrong indicated above, the practice has been steadily increasing, across all administrations, since it was first implemented in the early 1980s.

All in the same, this makes Trump’s support of the policy quite disturbing.  Mother Jones, of all places, sums up what it all means, and whether or not Trump actually supports the policy (or even realized the significance of it):
My guess is that he has no idea what civil asset forfeiture is and has no real opinion about it. If, say, Trump had been in a meeting with a few senators, and Bob Goodlatte had remarked that “police can seize your money even if you weren’t convicted of a crime,” Trump probably would have reflexively answered, “Can you believe that?” Instead, a sheriff said it was a bad thing related to Mexicans, so Trump automatically agreed with him. That means it’s now official Trump administration policy.
Obviously, the Sheriffs who met with Trump support the policy – it helps fund their departments.  Perhaps Trump was merely supporting lawmen and trying to unify everyone behind his stated policy of “law and order” by agreeing with them in words, and doing something different in practice.  Surely, we would all like to believe that Trump is prepared to concede that every citizen is innocent until proven guilty, and should have recourse to challenge the legality of any seizure of personal assets.
However, I’m not naive enough to think that is a certainty.  Trump very well could have realized exactly what he was doing and the policy he was supporting, and the ramifications behind his support.  He could actually believe the practice helps stop crime, and be ready to willingly disregard the rights of citizens to do so.  It is an extremely dangerous position to take; one that the Trump administration should clarify as soon as possible.
The average American citizen ends up being the big loser in the ongoing saga of oppressive conduct by the authorities, as the practice is unlikely to end without intervention via legislation and/or executive action.   So, while it would be nice if the media would ask the Trump administration for some clarity on their policy regarding civil asset forfeiture, they seem too preoccupied with asking Trump if he really wants to end a state Senator’s career, in their ongoing quest to boost their own ratings.
It would be funny, if it weren’t so sad.
 

NINTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS: ISLAM, THE LEFT, & APPROACHING CIVIL WAR

NINTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS: 
ISLAM, THE LEFT, & APPROACHING CIVIL WAR
 Published on Feb 9, 2017
The 9th Circuit has decided that Muslim foreign nationals from countries harboring terrorists are more important that your right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness
Website: http://www.thepatriotnurse.com
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ThePatriotNu...
Twitter: https://twitter.com/ThePatriotNurse