Translate

Thursday, September 22, 2016

TEXAS GOVERNOR ABBOTT THREATENS TO EXIT THE FEDERAL REFUGEE PROGRAM

TEXAS GOVERNOR THREATENS TO EXIT THE FEDERAL REFUGEE PROGRAM
Published on Sep 21, 2016
Texas Governor Greg Abbott has delivered an ultimatum to the Obama administration declaring that he does not want un-vetted "migrants" being housed in Texas.

Texas Governor Takes On Obama Refugee Invasion!
Published on Sep 21, 2016
InfoWars reporter Ashley Beckford went to the Texas State Capitol to discover the general public's opinion concerning Governor Greg Abbott's press release indicating Texas' intention to withdraw from Obama's refugee resettlement program.

Texas Threatens Withdrawal From Refugee Resettlement Program

BY WARREN MASS
SEE: http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/immigration/item/24114-texas-threatens-withdrawal-from-refugee-resettlement-program-over-security-concernsrepublished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

On September 21, the Texas Health and Human Services Commission sent a letter to Robert Carey, director of the federal Office of Refugee Resettlement, stating that unless the federal government “unconditionally” approves by September 30 the state’s new plan controlling refugee placements within Texas, the state agency will “exit” the U.S. Refugee Resettlement Program.
The commission told Carey that unless the Texas state plan is approved without changes by the end of the month “we will interpret your silence as a rejection of the application.”
The Houston Chronicle said that it had obtained a copy of the two-page letter, which was from Charles Smith, executive commissioner of the state commission. The letter advises the federal Office of Refugee Resettlement of the state's decision not to allow additional refugee resettlements “without assurances from the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Department of Homeland Security and the Director of National Intelligence that the refugees do not pose a security threat to our citizens.”
The Chronicle quoted from Smith’s letter further:
We remain willing to place refugees in Texas with the strict contingency that you and other specified federal security officials provide certification that each refugee does not pose a security threat.
Given your proclaimed confidence in your protocols, this appears to be a reasonable request. The State of Texas does not oppose the resettlement of all refugees, but we believe we are justified in our objection to the unmitigated placement of refugees from Syria and countries known to be supporters or propagators of terrorism.
If an agreement from the federal office is not forthcoming, Texas will join Kansas and New Jersey in withdrawing its participation in the refugee program. In the letter, the Texas Health and Human Services Commission provided a timetable for the Texas withdrawal, which would entail stopping all services and benefits that the state has been providing to refugee groups and contractors on January 31 — the first available date to withdraw under the state’s current agreement with the federal government.
The Chronicle cited a statement from Texas Governor Greg Abbott, who said that his agency’s letter was sent in response to the federal Office of Refugee Resettlement’s “unwillingness” to approve the state’s new refugee plan, which would require national security officials to ensure that refugees do not pose a security threat to Texas.
“Empathy must be balanced with security,” said Abbott, as quoted by the Chronicle
“Texas has done more than its fair share in aiding refugees, accepting more refugees than any other state between October 2015 and March 2016. While many refugees pose no danger, some pose grave danger, like the Iraqi refugee with ties to ISIS who was arrested earlier this year after he plotted to set off bombs at two malls in Houston.”
The Austin American-Statesman reported Abbott’s explanation that his state’s ultimatum was made because Texas officials don’t trust the federal government’s system of background checks for refugees “from terrorist-based nations.”
“The federal government lacks the capability or the will to distinguish the dangerous from the harmless, and Texas will not be an accomplice to such dereliction of duty to the American people,” Abbott continued.
“Even with the inability to properly vet refugees from Syria and countries known to be supporters or propagators of terrorism, President Obama is now ineptly proposing a dramatic increase in the number of refugees to be resettled in the U.S.,” said Abbott.
The American-Statesman noted that this latest Texas ultimatum follows a series of setbacks in the state’s attempts to curtail the resettlement of Syrian refugees within its borders.  
In several articles about the resistance presented by the governors of Texas and a majority of the other states (including Donald Trump’s running mate, Indiana Governor Mike Pence) to the Obama administration’s refugee plan, we quoted from an open letter that Abbott to President Obama shortly after the deadly terrorist attacks in Paris last November. That letter stated, in part:
As governor of Texas, I write to inform you that the State of Texas will not accept any refugees from Syria in the wake of the deadly terrorist attack in Paris.
Further, I — and millions of Americans — implore you to halt your plans to accept more Syrian refugees in the United States. A Syrian “refugee” appears to have been part of the Paris terror attack. American humanitarian compassion could be exploited to expose Americans to similar deadly danger. The reasons for such concerns are plentiful.
The FBI director testified to Congress that the federal government does not have the background information that is necessary to effectively conduct proper security checks on Syrian nationals, Director Comey explained: “We can query our database until the cows come home, but there will be nothing show up because we have no record of them.”
The Austin American-Statesman noted that attempts by Texas to stop the arrival of Syrian refugees have been blocked twice during the past year by U.S. District Judge David Godbey, who said that Texans’ fears of terrorism were based largely on speculative hearsay and that the state failed to provide sufficient evidence showing that terrorists had infiltrated the refugee program.
Following Godbey’s last such ruling in June, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton said he was disappointed that the judge’s decision meant “Texas cannot hold the federal government accountable.”
“We are considering our options moving forward to guarantee the safety of Texans from domestic and foreign threats,” said Paxton.
The ruling was also criticized by Texas Lt. Governor Dan Patrick, who said:
“Texas has a right to know who the federal government is bringing to Texas, where they are being placed and what they are doing to guarantee the safety of all Texans.”
In a recently published articleThe New American posed the question of whether our country was actually importing Middle East terrorism into the United States. This week’s event indicate that the officials in Texas are concerned that that is exactly what might be happening — and are determined to prevent terrorists from being imported into the Lone Star State.
Related articles:

SHERIFF JOE ARPAIO SAYS HE IS STILL INVESTIGATING OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE

Sheriff Joe Arpaio Says He Is Still Investigating Obama Birth Certificate

SHERIFF JOE ARPAIO SAYS HE IS STILL INVESTIGATING OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE

“I don’t care where he’s from, we are looking at a forged document. Period.”

BY STEVE WATSON
SEE: http://www.infowars.com/sheriff-joe-arpaio-says-he-is-still-investigating-obama-birth-certificate/republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

Sheriff Joe Arpaio, the man responsible for driving the investigation into the authenticity of president Obama’s birth certificate says he is not going to give up on the matter.
The law enforcer from Maricopa County made the remarks in a speech to a group that spearheaded the ‘birther’ movement, The Surprise Tea Party Patriots, on Tuesday, according to a report out of The Arizona Republic.
“I don’t know how it’s going to turn out.” Arpaio told the crowd, adding “I don’t care where he’s from, we are looking at a forged document. Period.”
Arpaio distanced himself from GOP nominee Donald Trump’s remarks on the matter last week. Trump said that he believes the matter is closed and that Obama was born in the United States.
“I had nothing to do with Trump on the birth certificate,” Arpaio said, adding “We did it on our own, because of you guys.”
Trump also stated last week that it was Hillary Clinton’s aides who blew up the birther issue in 2008 as part of a strategy when running against Obama for the Democratic nomination.
Mike Zullo, Arpaio’s right hand man on the investigation also spoke at the event, telling those gathered that Trump’s comments were a “punch in the gut, because it was unexpected.”
“It’s not going to deter us,” Zullo said. “It’s not going to stop us. I am closer than ever.” he added, describing Trump’s comments as “strategic.”
“I know all the politicians say, ‘Sheriff, don’t talk about it,’ ”Arpaio said Tuesday.
“But how can I back down when we started it? I’m not going to just forget it.” the Sheriff urged.


GOV'T COMING FOR YOUR INTERNET FREEDOM

GOV'T COMING FOR YOUR INTERNET FREEDOM
Published on Sep 22, 2016
Obama is set to hand over control of US internet to the UN body ICANN, increasing the power of foreign governments over the Internet, creating a gateway to content regulation. Free speech online could be censored by governments that do not hold this right to be of value. Owen Shoyer and Margaret Howell break it down. Follow them on Twitter - @allidoisowen @margaretjhowell

THE SHOCKING TRUTH ABOUT HILLARY'S OCTOBER SURPRISE

THE SHOCKING TRUTH ABOUT HILLARY'S OCTOBER SURPRISE 
DESPERATE ATTEMPTS TO SINK TRUMP COULD MEAN STAGED/PLANNED VIOLENCE 

ALERT: THE OCTOBER SURPRISE WILL BE A VIOLENT PROVOCATION BLAMED ON TRUMP


Hillary is desperate and will resort to dirty tricks


TRUMP ADVISOR PUBLISHES STORY ABOUT CLINTON CAMPAIGN REPEATEDLY CHARGING ONE-TIME DONORS

Trump Advisor Publishes Story About Clinton Campaign Repeatedly Charging One-time Donors
TRUMP ADVISOR PUBLISHES STORY ABOUT CLINTON CAMPAIGN REPEATEDLY CHARGING ONE-TIME DONORS 
BY BOB ADELMANN
SEE: http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/item/24105-trump-advisor-publishes-story-about-clinton-campaign-s-repeated-charging-one-time-donorsrepublished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

Back in March Carol Mahre, an 81-year-old grandmother and lifelong Democrat, decided to contribute $25 to the Hillary for America campaign. She gave a staff member her account information and on March 16 $25 was deducted from her US Bank checking account.
Later that day another $25 was deducted from her account. On March 29 $19 was deducted from her account, payable to the Hillary for America campaign.
She tried unsuccessfully to get the campaign to reverse the charges and asked her son Roger, a local attorney in Maplewood, Minnesota, for help. He picked up where she left off, calling the campaign headquarters many times but getting only a voicemail message saying that lines were busy.
Roger upped the ante and filed a fraud report with the Minnesota attorney general’s office, and asked a local CBS affiliate, KARE 11, for help. The station reported on the complaint in June, learning that Roger had no luck in resolving the issue either:
Mahre had her son Roger, an attorney, help her dispute the unauthorized charges on her credit card. Roger Mahre said over a period of three days in late April and early May, he placed dozens of calls to Hillary for America before someone finally answered the phone.
“I finally got through,” said Roger. “When I talked to the person at the other end and explained what was going on he seemed nice enough.”
Roger says the Hillary campaign representative promised to cancel the charges that weren’t authorized and make sure that no further payments were taken from Carol’s credit card.
“I asked him for email confirmation of that and he said he would get it to me,” said Roger “and I have never seen anything.”
On Carol’s bank statement a month later two more deductions to the Hillary for America campaign appeared in the amount of $25 each.
Two reporters from KARE 11 tried again:
On May 27, KARE 11 emailed the Hillary Clinton press account. Six days later, there’s been no response. KARE investigative reporter A.J. Lagoe also tweeted to Hillary for America’s Communications Director Jennifer Palmieri and Press Secretary Brian Fallon. They’ve also failed to respond.
Enter Jared Kushner. He is Donald Trump’s son-in-law (he’s married to Ivanka), the owner of a high-powered real estate company and a newspaper publishing company, the New York Observer. He’s also one of Trump’s key campaign advisors, heading up his “transition” team should Trump be elected president in November.
Kushner had a member of his staff at the Observer, Liz Crokin, look into the incident which resulted in an “exclusive” report published on September 15. Said the report:
[Carol Mahre’s experience] follows a pattern in which unwitting donors are charged multiple times, but always for a total less than $100, which is a key trigger point for banks’ internal action systems. [According to the numbers, however, Mahre had $119 taken from her account.]
Crokin’s investigation turned up rampant unauthorized charges to low-income donors that, she said, have resulted in “one of the nation’s biggest banks receiv[ing] up to 100 phone calls a day from Clinton’s small donors asking for refunds for unauthorized charges to their bankcards made by Clinton’s campaign.” Crokin relied on numerous sources for her report, who asked for anonymity to keep from putting their jobs at risk. Said one source:
We don’t investigate fraudulent charges unless they are over $100. The Clinton campaign knows this, that’s why we don’t see any charges over the $100 amount, they’ll stop the charges just below $100. We’ll see her campaign overcharge donors by $20, $40 or $60 but never more than $100….
The people who call us are just the ones who catch the fraudulent charges. I can’t imagine how many more people are getting overcharged by Hillary’s campaign and they have no idea.
Wrote Crokin:
The source, who has worked for Wells Fargo for over 10 years, said that the total amount they refund customers on a daily basis who have been overcharged by Clinton’s campaign “varies” but the bank usually issues refunds that total between $700 and $1,200 per day.
Searches by this writer for confirmation of the story at TruthorFiction.com and FactCheck.org turned up nothing. But Snopes had this to say about Kushner’s “exclusive” report:
WHAT'S TRUE: A Minnesota woman reported that she incurred a couple of additional overcharges by the Clinton campaign after making a one-time donation of $25.
WHAT'S UNDETERMINED: Whether campaign donation overcharges are deliberate and widespread, rather than the rare product of isolated glitches or user error.
Snopes couldn’t find confirmation that others, hundreds of others, were being ripped off by the Clinton campaign:
The Observer article stated an anonymous source had told them that about 100 people per day were complaining about spurious Clinton campaign charges to Wells Fargo alone, a figure which spread across all financial institutions would suggest that thousands and thousands of Clinton donors were reporting similar fraud issues every month.
But — even though this "fraud" has supposedly been taking place since Spring 2016 — we weren't able to find instances of more such complaints on Facebook, Twitter, or any other social media platform or forum, outside of two January 2016 Twitter pleas from someone seeking assistance in canceling a recurring donation.
However, Snopes did turn up a high degree of reluctance by Wells Fargo to discuss the matter with them:
We contacted Wells Fargo's fraud department in an attempt to verify the breadth of fraudulent charge issue, and after placing us on hold, a representative ambiguously stated that the rumor "had nothing to do" specifically with the campaign of Hillary Clinton (which could mean anything from "the rumor is baseless" to "it's a merchant/processor issue"). We also contacted Wells Fargo's media relations division, who said nothing beyond "We have no comment at this time."
It’s possible that Wells Fargo, undergoing intense scrutiny over creating thousands of phony accounts, just doesn’t want to add to their current woes. It’s also possible that Carol Maher inadvertently signed up for a recurring draft against her USBank account. That’s unlikely, of course, as those charges were random and in differing amounts.
The best that can be said of the incident, barring others coming forward with similar stories of overcharging by the Clinton campaign, was offered by investigative reporter Mish Shedlock:
I cannot prove any of this. Nor can anyone else unless they have a recording of the call. But there is a moral to this story, two actually:
Do not give [your] credit card or bank account information out to anyone who calls you.
Do not give money to untrustworthy people or known liars. It will only give you grief.

PASTOR MANNING, NYC: DONALD TRUMP BOWS DOWN TO OBAMA'S BIRTH CERTIFICATE

PASTOR MANNING OF HARLEM, 
NEW YORK CITY 
DONALD TRUMP BOWS DOWN TO OBAMA'S BIRTH CERTIFICATE 

EXCLUSIVE: LEAKED VIDEO SHOWS OBAMA RAILING AGAINST WHITE PEOPLE DURING KENYA TRIP

EXCLUSIVE: LEAKED VIDEO SHOWS OBAMA RAILING AGAINST WHITE PEOPLE DURING KENYA TRIP

"I'm deeply saddened that whites are superior"

BY PAUL JOSEPH WATSON
SEE: http://www.infowars.com/exclusive-leaked-video-shows-obama-railing-against-white-people-during-kenya-trip/republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

Never before seen video set to be released soon shows President Barack Obama railing against white people during a 1990 trip to Kenya.
The footage, filmed and narrated by Obama’s sister Auma, shows the president on his first trip to Kenya as a young man in his 20s. Michelle Obama also accompanied her husband on the trip.
WeSearchr’s Chuck Johnson exclusively revealed to Infowars Obama’s comments in the video, which include him denouncing white privilege.
Obama says in the film: “I’m deeply saddened by a sense that whites are still superior in this country, in some sense, that if you sit at a restaurant, they’re served before a Kenyan is served. If you go through customs, a white person is going to have an easier time going through customs.”
At one point in the movie Obama says he has “a lot at stake” in building “a strong black country in Kenya.”
“The film is full of insights into Barack Obama’s psychology and worldview, especially with regards to the way he sees his family in Kenya and black-white race relations,” according to Johnson. “How much of a black nationalist do you think Obama is? What do you think he thinks of white people?”
The comments will provide further ammunition for Obama critics who claim that the president has used the office to stoke racial division, especially given his sympathies towards ‘Black Lives Matter’, a group whose ideological inspiration is a convicted cop killer on the FBI’s ‘Most Wanted Terrorists’ list.
Johnson will release the clip in full and it will be featured exclusively on Infowars when he crowd funds the cost of his private eye to obtain the footage. Expect that to happen soon.
_____________________________________________________
Leaked Video Shows Obama Railing Against 'White Superiority'
Published on Sep 20, 2016
A new video has surfaced from Barack Obama's visit to Kenya where he pulled no punches condemning the 'superiority of whites'.

Wednesday, September 21, 2016

SBC'S SOUTHWESTERN SEMINARY INVITES FALSE TEACHER, ALAN ROBERTSON, TO SPEAK AT CHAPEL

SBC'S SOUTHWESTERN SEMINARY INVITES FALSE TEACHER, ALAN ROBERTSON, 
TO SPEAK AT CHAPEL 
BY JEFF MAPLES
SEE: http://pulpitandpen.org/2016/09/19/southwestern-seminary-invites-false-teacher-alan-robertson-to-speak-at-chapel/republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

Fellowship with darkness is no stranger to Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary. It was the president of this Southern Baptist seminary, Paige Patterson, that once enrolled a practicing Muslim into the seminary. It seems as though this seminary prides itself on its diversity–you know, the 2 Corinthians 6:14 (ESV) kind that Paul warns against:
Do not be unequally yoked with unbelievers. For what partnership has righteousness with lawlessness? Or what fellowship has light with darkness?
On October 27, 2016, a famous TV star will be carted in to address the chapel at Southwestern. Reverend Alan Robertson, known for his appearances on Duck Dynasty as the clan’s pastor, will be available to proclaim his version of the Gospel to the students. Alan Robertson and the Duck Dynasty clan are members of White’s Ferry Road Church (WFR). White’s Ferry Road Church is a part of the Church of Christ denomination which arose out of the restoration movement over a century ago. The Church of Christ denomination has long held to the heresy of baptismal justification–that the act of baptism is essential to salvation. According to WFR’s statement of faith found on their website, they believe the following regarding salvation:
WE BELIEVE that salvation is by grace through faith in the gospel. God showed us His grace through Jesus’ death, burial and resurrection. It is that message that calls people to believe the gospel and its power to save, turn from their sins, confess Jesus as Lord, and be immersed in water, reenacting the death, burial and resurrection. This is the message that was preached in the first century beginning with Acts 2 and how the people responded to this message.
The denomination’s statement of faith affirms the belief in the necessity of salvation by faith and baptism. Further, you can also see a video of Phil Robertson, another leading member of the Duck Dynasty clan, and an elder at WFR Church, explain the church’s belief regarding baptism confirming its necessity for salvation.
You might ask, “what’s the harm here?” We’re sure the majority of students at Southwestern Seminary would agree that baptism has no power to save and that the belief in the necessity of baptism for salvation is, in essence, a denial of Christ’s finished work on the cross–a damnable heresy. The bigger question, however, remains unanswered: what fellowship has light with darkness?
What could possibly be the benefit of bringing in Alan Robertson, a man who clearly denies the saving power of Christ’s finished work on the cross, to address the students at a Southern Baptist Seminary? Are they bringing him in to debate the merits of his false Gospel, and expose his heresies? Unlikely. The likely reason is this: it attracts people.
Let’s just be real for a moment, shall we? Paige Patterson knows full well that Alan Robertson believes in baptismal justification. He also knows that this false gospel has no power to save. But I suspect he also believes that these unfortunate facts do not outweigh the perceived benefits of attracting large amounts of professing Christians. By bringing in a conservative television hero, the seminary can say “hey, look at us. We’re relevant, we’re cool, join us, send us money.”
You adulterous people! Do you not know that friendship with the world is enmity with God? Therefore whoever wishes to be a friend of the world makes himself an enemy of God. – James 4:4 (ESV)

NANCY LEIGH (DEMOSS) WOLGEMUTH MIXES PAGAN WITCHCRAFT CIRCLE-MAKING WITH CHRISTIANITY

tw12speakerprayer
SEE OUR OWN POST:

Monday, June 17, 2013

NANCY LEIGH DEMOSS "HEARTS REVIVED", BUT AT WHAT PRICE? A VENEER OF CHRISTIANITY HIDING SPIRITUAL FORMATION DISCIPLINES, CONTEMPLATIVE MYSTICISM & WITCHCRAFT?

NANCY LEIGH (DEMOSS) WOLGEMUTH MIXES PAGAN WITCHCRAFT CIRCLE-MAKING 
WITH CHRISTIANITY 
BY JEFF MAPLES
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

One of the most basic devices used in ancient pagan spirituality is the “circle of protection.” You find it everywhere from the Eastern mystery religions to modern witchcraft. The circle of protection was commonly used in old Gypsy magic, as it was thought to create an impenetrable barrier of protection around those in which it was created.
This “magic” circle, spiritual in nature, could be something physical, such as lines drawn in the dirt or sand, or even a sprinkling of salt. But they could also be imaginary. On page 43 of Gypsy Magic: A Romany Book of Spells, Charms, and Fortune-Telling by Patrinella Cooper, she says
A similar exercise can be done at any time when you are feeling uneasy or before you go to sleep at night. Visualise the blue line of fire. In your mind’s eye, slowly draw its vibrant protective beam around yourself, your bed, or your property. Try to imagine every detail of its path until it finally closes in a protective circle.
Creating a circular boundary is an ancient form of spiritual protection. The space within the circle becomes consecrated ground. The circle itself becomes a barrier keeping all unwelcomed things at bay.
The use of this protective circle and other forms of witchcraft have been an integral part of Gypsy spiritual life and culture since the earliest foundations. It’s quite common for cultural traditions to be carried over from generation to generation, even when other religions, including Christianity, become an accepted or even prominent expression of spirituality. One famous Gypsy from the late 19th century and early 20th century, named Rodney “Gipsy” Smith, is widely regarded as a great Christian evangelist and revivalist from England. The practice of integrating the Gypsy witchcraft circle of protection into Christianity is widely attributed to Smith. When asked of Smith how to start a revival, he replied:
Find a piece of chalk, and find an empty room. Go into that room and shut the door. Draw a circle on the floor with that chalk, kneel down in that circle, and ask God to start revival right there.
Of course, this practice of circle-making can be found nowhere in Scripture. This is purely a pagan practice that Mr. Smith adapted from his cultural upbringing to fit with his newly found Christianity. So does this practice of circle-making by Mr. Smith really have anything to do with the ancient Pagan circles of the Gypsies?
Perhaps the most prominent figure in modern day evangelicalism who promotes the practice of “prayer circles” is Mark Batterson. Batterson attempts to trace his practice of circle-making back to Gipsy Smith. Batterson writes:
The goal of Draw the Circle: The 40-Day Prayer Challenge is to help readers establish a daily prayer habit with a daily dose of prayer inspiration.  It picks up where The Circle Maker left off, with the story of Gipsy Smith. Then it shares new stories and new learnings in prayer that will inspire you to dream big, pray hard, and think long!
Batterson also writes in an articleSeven Prayer Circles for Parents,
In Praying Circles Around The Lives of Your Children I share seven tips, seven circles. They range from praying a hedge of protection around your kids to making prayer lists.
So here we can see that regardless of how Mr. Smith himself intended to use his “prayer circle,” Mark Batterson has interpreted it the same way the ancient Pagans and Gypsies have done. He sees the circle as not only a symbol to ask God for “revival,” but as a device for spiritual protection. The practice of circle-making and praying circles (or hedges) of protection are wildly unbiblical ideas and completely foreign to the context of Scripture. (For more on this, I would suggest Jim Osman’s book, Truth or Territory)
Sadly this witchcraft circle-making heresy has crept its way into orthodox evangelical circles (no pun intended) through the likes of men like Batterson and former Southern Baptist president, Ronnie Floyd. But another prominent figure who is promoting this junk is Nancy Leigh (DeMoss) Wolgemuth. A very popular women’s prayer event, CryOut, is led by DeMoss, and the event centers around this unbiblical form of pagan prayer. DeMoss, as well, attributes her practice of circle-making to Gipsy Smith, as she says,
Gipsy Smith was a nineteenth-century revivalist who did something unusual when he came to a new town. He’d stop on the outskirts and draw a circle in the dirt. Then he would stand inside that circle and say, “O God, please send a revival to this town, and let it begin inside this circle.”
It won’t do much good for me to ask God to convict the world around me of sin if there’s unconfessed sin in my own heart. The first step toward revival is to ask God to show us our sin and repent.
Would you ask God to revive His people? Would you let the Holy Spirit draw a circle within your own heart? Then say, “Lord, I long for You to send a revival to my nation, my church, my marriage, and my children. But Lord, would You first start a revival inside this circle? Let it begin in me.”
DeMoss also turns her listeners of her radio program to a known false teacher and promoter of pagan mysticism, Richard Foster. Foster is one of the founders of the Spiritual Formation movement, a movement whose central disciplines revolve around contemplative prayer and other forms of Eastern mysticism.
While she claims that her (unbiblical) practice is rooted in Christianity and is merely symbolic of the revival that we should pray for in our hearts, she is clearly misguided on what are acceptable forms of prayer and worship in the eyes of God. Has she forgotten in Exodus 32, when Aaron commanded the Israelites to remove the gold jewelry from their bodies and fashion a golden calf out of it? He proclaimed, “Tomorrow shall be a feast to the Lord.” (Exodus 32:5) Even though Aaron believed that he was doing this for the Lord, the Lord had clearly set guidelines for what he found acceptable as worship, and Aaron and the Israelites ignored. God’s wrath was against them.
Does Nancy Leigh DeMoss really believe that God is okay with her promoting and practicing spiritual paganism and calling it Christian? God has not given grounds or precedent to do this. Yet, she is opening up the doors of witchcraft and demonic influences to her followers by pushing this practice. Does she think she’s found a new way to pray for revival–a way that God didn’t already think of? Does she think that this Eastern mysticism-influenced form of prayer will be somehow more effective than the methods God has laid out for us in Scripture?
Be very careful of who you follow, whose books you read, and whose prayer conferences you attend. Test everything against Scripture to see if they are of God (1 Thessalonians 5:21). And please, do your research, so that you can’t be led astray (2 Tim 2:15).
take care that you be not ensnared to follow them, after they have been destroyed before you, and that you do not inquire about their gods, saying, ‘How did these nations serve their gods?—that I also may do the same.’ – Deuteronomy 12:30
See also: