Translate

Wednesday, May 25, 2016

NORTH CAROLINA POLICE ABUSE: MOM JAILED FOR CHILD ABUSE WHEN 11 YEAR OLD DRIVES GOLF CART


MOM JAILED FOR CHILD ABUSE 
WHEN 11 YEAR OLD DRIVES GOLF CART 

THE MOTHER RECOUNTS HER TERROR AT HANDS OF OUT OF CONTROL POLICE
                                

THE FATHER WAS ABLE TO FILM THE INCIDENT 
                               

Mother lets son drive golf cart at resort, 
gets jailed for child abuse
BY MARK WASHBURN
SEE: http://www.charlotteobserver.com/news/local/article78955387.htmlrepublished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

Union County couple’s Bald Head Island vacation ends in handcuffs
Mother says officer was aggressive, threatening
Village says public safety officers acted appropriately
Julie Mall was arrested at Bald Head Island after police stopped the family for allowing 11-year-old son to drive a golf cart.
On the second day of her dream vacation on exclusive Bald Head Island, Julie Mall went with her family to the beach to catch the sunset. Her 11-year-old son asked to drive the golf cart back to their $1,000-a-day rented cottage.
It was dusk, no traffic on the path and his father would sit next to him. A two-block, 30-second ride. She said sure. What could go wrong?
In the next four hours, Mall says she was pinned to the ground by police, repeatedly accused of being drunk, frogmarched barefoot aboard a ferry in handcuffs, jailed in leg irons and charged with child abuse.
Mall’s case, which occurred on a laid-back luxury resort island where golf carts take the place of automobiles, is a example of how an encounter with police can spiral out of control even in the most idyllic of settings.
To be sure, Mall’s case doesn’t rise to the magnitude of recent police confrontations that have spurred a national debate. But it left the Charlotte suburbanite physically bruised, emotionally shaken and ensnared in a protracted legal tangle she could never foresee.
There are two versions of what happened, one told by Mall and her companions that night and one by the authorities. Bald Head officials would not discuss the details of the encounter beyond what is in the official report.
Mall, a mother of two, wasn’t shopping her story around or trying to get publicity. We heard about it from a third party and contacted her, asking if she would discuss it with the Observer. She agreed because she felt it was important for people to know what could happen.
“I just want it on the record,” Mall says, “in case it happens to someone else.”

A picturesque resort

Bald Head Island, about 20 miles south of Wilmington, is one of the most enchanting enclaves in the Carolinas.
About a 20-minute ferry ride from Southport, the island boasts extensive wetlands, maritime forest and 14 miles of wide beach.
Stories from the golden age of piracy and the Civil War are threaded through its peculiar history. It is home to luxury cottages worth millions and a scenic golf course. Sea turtles have built their nests on Bald Head since antiquity, and it is home to Old Baldy, built in 1817, the oldest standing lighthouse in North Carolina.
Bald Head Village has about 25 officers in its Public Safety Department. With a year-round population of 168, the municipality has the enviable ratio of one officer for every seven residents. By comparison, Charlotte’s ratio is about one for every 438 residents.
Because of its distance from the mainland, Bald Head officers are expected to be trained in the three disciplines needed by the public safety agency – law enforcement, fire/rescue and emergency medical.
Hiring officers with all three skills can be challenging, Village Manager Chris McCall says, and often candidates are hired with some skills and then trained in the others.

Says she was wrong

Mall says there is no question she was wrong. You must be 16 and have a valid drivers’ license to drive a golf cart on Bald Head Island. There have been fatal accidents there from people falling out of carts.
What troubles her, Mall says, was what she describes as hostile, aggressive treatment by police.
Mall, 43, 5-foot-4 and 125 pounds, is a software sales representative. Until last summer, the whole of her criminal record was a speeding ticket in 2007. She and her husband, an information technology consultant, have been married for 19 years, are active in St. Matthew Catholic Church and live on the outskirts of Ballantyne in Union County.
Mall says her family has been spending a week on Bald Head for years, a trip they look forward to all year.
Mall says they were nearly back to their cottage the evening of July 26, 2015, when a police golf cart with flashing lights pulled them over on Muscadine Wynd, one of the many paved paths on the island.
An officer came up to the cart that was carrying her, her husband, Scott Mall, 45, their 11-year-old son Josh and 9-year-old daughter Erin, her niece Stephanie Phelps, 22, of Chapel Hill and Rocket, their Golden Retriever.
“Immediately he started berating us,” she says. “He was saying ‘How old is this kid?’ ‘Are you guys drunk?’ ‘I could write you up for child abuse.’ 
Mall says she had no more than a single glass of wine with dinner hours earlier, and no one was intoxicated.
As the officer’s tirade continued, she says, her son burst into tears. She asked her niece to take the children back to the cottage.

‘You ought to be ashamed’

Mall says after the sobbing children left, she told the officer she was angry that he had upset them unnecessarily. “I said, ‘You ought to be ashamed of yourself,’ and I stuck my finger in his face.”
She says the officer didn’t have a citation book with him, so he radioed for someone to bring him one. A second police vehicle arrived, and later a third.
Four or five officers were conferring there when she asked her husband to drive their golf cart back to the cottage to get mosquito repellent, leaving her alone in the dark with the police.
Mall says she was standing on the median of the path tapping away on her cell phone when the officer came over and told her she was blocking traffic and she needed to return to her golf cart – which no longer was there.
Mall says she was standing off the roadway at the time and the police vehicles had the road blocked.
“He said, ‘You need to go back to your golf cart or I’m going to cuff you,’ ” she says. “He lunged across at me, twisting my arm behind my back. I’m hysterical. I’ve never been that scared of anything in my life.”

Officer says they were drunk, unruly

James Hunter was the arresting officer. Hunter, who joined the force in August 2014, declined to discuss the incident, referring all questions about the encounter to the village attorney.
But his version is spelled out in his official report, which starts by saying he pulled over the golf cart about 8:45 p.m. when he saw an underage driver.
He said in his report he approached the cart, identified himself and began talking to the Malls.
“I immediately observed both to be intoxicated. In explaining the rules and regulations to the pair, both were uncooperative and obstinate, with the female stating several times, ‘Well, just cite me.’ 
Hunter’s report said as he was preparing a citation, Julie Mall was “agitated and loud, standing in the middle of the street and interfering with passing vehicular and pedestrian traffic.” He said he ordered her to move out of the road and she refused.
“In attempting to secure the custody of the female, same dropped to the ground and began screaming and flailing around, refusing to surrender her hands or obey officer commands,” Hunter wrote.
“Same was physically assaultive and required me to initiate ground control to secure her custody.”

Knee in back

Scott Mall was returning from the cottage when the ruckus began. Police told him to stand back as his wife was wrestled to the ground in the median, Hunter’s knee in her back. Mall took out his cell phone and videoed the scene.
“As soon as I came up there, I saw him start coming toward her,” Mall says. “My reaction was to film it so we’d have some proof because I knew this wasn’t an up-and-up situation.”
Scott Mall says no one was drunk. Other Bald Head officers he talked to that night, he says, were calm, courteous and professional.
“It became a frightening situation,” he says. “It escalated out of control.”

Taken to headquarters

Julie Mall was driven to Bald Head Island’s public safety office.
She says she was led inside and down a hall. Hunter stopped at a conference room where Mall says she saw several officers sitting around a table drinking Red Bulls and watching what appeared to be an inappropriate video on a big screen TV.
“It was like the Twilight Zone,” she says. “There’s fully naked women in a forest bouncing around.”
It was a Discovery Channel series called “Naked and Afraid,” the village says, a series that tests survival skills of contestants dropped into the wild with no clothes and few provisions.
Mall says she was not told what she was being charged with, nor was she given any sobriety tests. Hunter and another officer took her to the ferry, where about 30 passengers were waiting for the next boat.

Marched on ferry

When it arrived, she says she was led aboard barefoot – she lost her flip-flops in the struggle – for the trip to Southport. Waiting passengers were told they would have to wait for the next boat because a prisoner was being transported.
Mall says a ferry worker put a life jacket over her head but did not buckle it because her arms were handcuffed.
Once on the mainland, Hunter took her to the Brunswick detention center in Bolivia, 20 miles away, arriving about 11:45 p.m.
Hunter told Magistrate Brock Holmes Jr. that Mall failed to surrender her hands to be handcuffed, was intoxicated and disruptive, blocked traffic and challenged him to a fight.
Hunter charged her with resisting a public officer, intoxicated and disruptive and misdemeanor child abuse. Holmes set $1,000 bond.

Night in jail

Her mug shot was taken and Hunter went to fingerprint her, but Mall says she asked someone else in the jail to do it because she was afraid of the officer. “I didn’t want him touching me again.”
When Hunter’s handcuffs were removed, Mall’s ankles were shackled with a chain by a jailer, she says, and she was put into a cell with two other women. There was a pay phone, but another prisoner was using it.
Her husband caught a ferry, drove to the jail and found a bondsman. She was released and they drove to the ferry landing to await the first boat at 5 a.m.
Mall says she was examined by a doctor on the island, who said she suffered whiplash-like injuries.

Village defends arrest

Charles Baldwin, Bald Head Village’s attorney, said the village declined to comment on the specifics of the case because of the possibility of further legal action. But he gave this statement to the Observer:
“The village takes seriously the safety of its residents and visitors, including children, particularly in the operation of motor vehicles.
“Officers on scene acted appropriately and in their best judgment for the safety of the child and also of the adults involved.”
In a follow-up statement, the village added: “As to the specific incident involving Julie Mall, the village believes the arrest report, which is a public record, speaks for itself. The village denies any allegation that she was treated anything other than as professionally and courteously as the circumstances would allow.”

Another version

Stephanie Phelps of Chapel Hill is Julie Mall’s niece. She was spending the week with the family at Bald Head as she had for the past three years.
They were celebrating her 22nd birthday and her new job as a cancer researcher at Duke that day. They made cupcakes, had dinner and went to the beach, took some pictures, then watched the sunset.
Phelps, who was in the rear seat of the golf cart facing backward, says the Bald Head officer seemed hostile from the beginning.
“I thought maybe he was having a bad day. He was agitated. He was yelling, making vigorous hand gestures, leaning into the golf cart.”
Her aunt’s responses to the officer were respectful, Phelps says, and no one was intoxicated.
“He asked Aunt Julie if she was drunk, and she said ‘no,’ and he wouldn’t let it go. He kept asking her, ‘Are you drunk, have you been drinking?’ … He wasn’t speaking in a calm tone. He was yelling, threatening to take her kids away from her.”
Both children were frightened by the encounter, she says.
“It took me hours to get them to calm down,” she says. “They thought they might never see their mom again. It was terrible.”

Days in court

Mall and her husband shared their story with family friend Philip Howerton Jr., who also viewed the video of her arrest. Howerton, a former Mecklenburg lead felony prosecutor and now a retired district judge, wrote to Mall’s Wilmington attorney calling the arrest an “egregious, indeed despicable, instance of police misconduct” and offered to testify in her behalf.
Mall returned to Brunswick County, about 200 miles from Charlotte, on Aug. 20, 2015, for trial on the charges. Officer Hunter, who had been subpoenaed, did not appear, and the case was continued until Oct. 2.
Mall returned on that date, but Hunter again failed to show up for court. Baldwin, the village attorney, says his understanding was that the officer was told to be on standby and was expecting a phone call summoning him to testify, but he never got the call. Without a witness, the state dismissed the case.
But the charges could be reinstated by the district attorney’s office any time up to two years after the offense, under N.C. law.
Mall works as a volunteer at charities and her children’s schools – St. Matthew in Ballantyne and Holy Trinity in Charlotte – and is concerned that routine record checks showing she’d been charged with child abuse could make her ineligible for service.
She could have the charges legally expunged from her record, but under N.C. law, you can only do that once. “One per lifetime per human being,” says Bruce Mason, her Wilmington attorney.
If the charges were reinstated after the expungement, they would return to her record and be indelible, even if she were acquitted.
“I’m not a menace to society,” she says. “I’m not a child abuser.”
For this summer’s vacation at the beach, Mall already has made reservations. At Isle of Palms, S.C.



Read more here: http://www.charlotteobserver.com/news/local/article78955387.html#storylink=cpy



Read more here: http://www.charlotteobserver.com/news/local/article78955387.html#storylink=cpy


Read more here: http://www.charlotteobserver.com/news/local/article78955387.html#storylink=cpy

Read more here: http://www.charlotteobserver.com/news/local/article78955387.html#storylink=cpy

Read more here: http://www.charlotteobserver.com/news/local/article78955387.html#storylink=cpy


Tuesday, May 24, 2016

KINDERGARTEN SEX EDUCATION THROUGH COMMON CORE~CERTAINLY NOT CHRISTIAN

KINDERGARTEN SEX EDUCATION THROUGH COMMON CORE 
Published on May 24, 2016
📚 Kindergarten Sex Ed Through Common Core. Since the onset of Common Core, Dr. Duke Pesta, FreedomProject Academy, and others have warned of the links between Common Core and the National Sexuality Standards Project. Despite the deception of Common Core supporters, we now have proof that the Sexuality Standards are being filtered into Common Core classrooms, starting in Kindergarten. More @ https://fpeusa.org/commoncore

National Sexuality Education Standards PDF -- http://www.futureofsexed.org

🎓 FreedomProject Academy's Common Core Free, Live Online School is Faithfully Educating America. Individual Classes & Complete Judeo-Christian Curriculum for K-12. Free Information Packet @ https://fpeusa.org
DR. DUKE PESTA SPEAKS


Sex Ed Standards: Students Should Be Able
To Define Rape


Common Core Presentation: Part 4 -
Sexuality Education Standards
Published on Feb 13, 2015
This is part 4 of an 8 part series regarding Common Core Educational Standards. This presentation was recorded at the Holmes County Liberty Coalition meeting in Millersburg, Ohio on Thursday, February 12, 2015.


Dr. Duke Pesta on Common Core and the Shocking Sexual Education Standards K-12


Dr. Duke Pesta ~ National Sex Education Standards
Published on Aug 2, 2014
Women On the Wall hosted Dr. Duke Pesta in Keller, Tx. ~ National Sex Education Standards
VIDEO – DR. DUKE PESTA – Explains the lies behind Common Core, lays out names/dates/facts
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0pzR6...

After watching this video, the public will be able to counter the Common Core proponents with the brutal facts that discredit those behind this federal takeover of our children’s minds and souls:
LINK TO PART 2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yq1d6...




KAREN SCHOEN: AMERICA FOR SALE

AMERICA FOR SALE

BY KAREN SCHOEN
SEE: http://www.newswithviews.com/Schoen/karen118.htmrepublished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

Key to success is Buy Low Sell High. How many times have we heard this? This is the basis of making a profit. A concept that used to be taught in our economics classes in school.
Today we work on the principal of Lenin “"The Capitalists will sell us the rope with which we will hang them." Money is the driving force running America today with the assistance of the governing elite self proclaimed leaders.
There is just one problem. According to the US Constitution, NO LONGER TAUGHT IN SCHOOL for this reason, the resources and land of America belong to the America people. There is not one government agency, with any authority, to buy American land and resources and sell it to foreign countries and corporations. Yet this has been going for decades. This fraudulent practice will be escalated under the TPP. How does it work that these Government and non-Government agencies get the land and resources to sell? Answer: By using fraudulent practices, lying to the people.
Follow with me and I will give you the playbook how to level and sell America.
1. Institute Political Correctness and demonize anyone who objects. Demonize encompasses: loss of job, loss of reputation, loss of property, and savings, massive law suits. Forced political correctness is a violation of the First amendment to the Bill of Rights.
2. School: These students become legislators and government workers.
a. Eliminate America’s exceptionalism, pride, values, nationalism, individualism from all school curricula. They have been taught from pre-K and up, America is evil, you are worthless, you can not make decisions, you only have rights and permission to exist from the government. Government becomes God.
b. Eliminate factual information replaced by value driven information. Facts are truth. Values are opinions changeable by the whim of the government. Eliminating truth eliminates the ability to communicate since nothing is real, there is no common thread to bind Americans together.
c. Eliminate individualism and replace it with collectivism creating protected classes. The Constitution says We the People, and guarantees We the People equal rights. There is no need for protected classes; unless you’re motivation is to create victims, divide the people and get rich collecting donations.
d. Eliminate individual ownership of business, land , resources. Ownership creates wealth. Only the government can have wealth. Sustainability programs eliminate individualism for lies. As Gina Ma Carthy (EPA) said, We regulate. It doesn’t matter if the program does anything as long as we gain control.
Once a child hears this program (which is really communism) from the time they enter school until the time they leave, America is lost forever. A President Trump can give all control of education back to the states but if the curricula and methodology of education is not changed, nothing will change.
3. All School programs are reinforced by Hollywood, the media and GRANTS. We are living proof that the desired results, a dumb populace, insures legislator they have free reign to plunder. As one congressman put it, 'Voters are incredibly ignorant and know little about our form of government and how it works,' the anonymous Congressman writer claims.
'It's far easier than you think to manipulate a nation of naive, self-absorbed sheep who crave instant gratification.'
And the take-away message is one of resigned depression about how Congress sacrifices America's future on the altar of its collective ego. Read more.
4. Once government training is complete in school, and these bobble heads learn how to get elected by lying. The ignorant populace is fooled again. Read more.
School curricula and method of training is the common denominator. Every American at some time in their life has been involved in a school setting. The indoctrination can be seen today just by the make up of this election. Half the population will vote to give up freedom – after all if you don’t know what freedom is, then it is easy to give it up for the promise of free stuff. No one ever asks who is paying for this? No one cares. The population lives in the moment, no history, no thoughts of future consequences – never learned in school. Instead, they must live for today as long as I feel good, it must be good. Seniors, we have failed our one job: To leave the future generations better off than ourselves.
In order to feel good, we buy into the lies instead of questioning the results of the lies. Obama lies, Clinton lies. Obama destroyed what was left of America and Clinton will continue his failed policies. Clinton will continue with massive corruption, creating crushing policies, selling American assets to the highest bidder. She sold uranium mines to the Russians who now own 20% of America’s uranium. Clinton has no problem getting her connections of donors to do her bidding. If you call yourself a conservative and stay home this election, YOU ARE THE PROBLEM.
VIRGINIA-:URANIUM LAWSUIT DISMISSED BY FEDERAL JUDGE (AGAINST GOV. MCAULIFFE, BY FRIEND OF HILLARY'S! VA. ATTORNEY GENERAL MARK HERRING (D) HAS LAWSUIT IS MISSED BY FEDERAL JUDGE [LINK]
VA. ATTORNEY GENERAL MARK HERRING ENDORSED HILLARY IN 2016 ELECTION. [Link]
Will anyone question or will they just vote the way they did in the past? The plunder of America’s resources will continue as long as Americans remain ignorant. Americans will remain ignorant as long as the curricula remains the same. Ignorant about:
1. unconstitutional treaties like UN Agenda 21 (Bush), NAFTA, GATT, TPP
2. use of the unconstitutional Endangered Species Act by withholding water from hundreds of farmers to favor a fish devastating the California farming industry endangering American produce, or
3. the unconstitutional Bureau of Land Management jailing and or killing ranchers in order to steal their property, or
4. NOAA determining that most American fish are off limits due to fictitious limits, or
5. EPA regulating coal out of business just because they can, or  
6. Dept of Interior refusing to give oil companies permits. 
7. DOJ Lynch making LGBT more important than the safety of American women and children. 
8. DHS determining that seniors and veterans are domestic terrorists
9. Governors selling land and businesses to foreign corporations who bring their own workers
10. The UN and foreign countries dictating laws to supersede the US Constitution.
 The list is vast and will continue to eliminate freedom, liberty and the pursuit of happiness as long as Americans remain ignorant. So I ask you, if President Trump returns education back to the states and local communities, will you review the curricula and reinsert America, God and Family or will you think you have done your job, elected the fixer and do not have to pay attention? If not you who? If not now, when?




PRO "BREXIT" MOVIE MASTERFULLY EXPOSES EUROPEAN UNION HORROR SHOW

Pro-Brexit Movie Masterfully Exposes EU Horror Show
TRAILER:

PRO "BREXIT" MOVIE MASTERFULLY EXPOSES EUROPEAN UNION HORROR SHOW
BY ALEX NEWMAN
SEE: http://www.thenewamerican.com/world-news/europe/item/23228-pro-brexit-movie-masterfully-exposes-eu-horror-showrepublished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

There are more than 100 European Union laws that govern pillows. Almost 500 EU laws cover towels. More than 65 EU laws deal with bathrooms. A “mere” 31 EU laws cover toothbrushes, while close to 50 govern toothpaste, and more than 170 deal with mirrors. And that is all just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to the super-state's radical lawmaking. Yet, the people of Europe have no clue what those laws say, how they were made, by whom, or even for what purpose. More importantly, perhaps, they have no way of getting rid of the laws or those who usurped the power to make them.
But now, thanks to the “British Exit” (Brexit) referendum coming up on June 23, the British people have what may be a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to secede from the out-of-control super-state that has taken over their lives. And the new film Brexit: The Movie, which highlighted the dizzying array of EU laws listed here, may be the best resource yet for explaining the necessity of restoring Britain's independence. Best of all, it is available for free.     
In a little more than an hour, the hard-hitting documentary gives a thorough overview of the many dangers posed by the EU. One commentator interviewed in the film compares EU membership with being shackled to a rotting corpse. The analogy is fitting in more ways than one. Another source interviewed in the film says, “The EU is turning into a dictatorship, and this is not overstating it.” And indeed, the movie makes a powerful case that a dangerous dictatorship is exactly what the EU is becoming.
The film does an especially great job of debunking the myths and fear-mongering being peddled by pro-EU apparatchiks in the establishment and beyond. A brief tour through Switzerland, which is by far Europe's most successful nation on every metric yet and which has fiercely resisted pressure to join the EU, drives the point home perfectly. Britain can regain its sovereignty, and at the same time benefit immensely as a result.   
“This is the most important voting decision that any of us is going to make in our lifetime,” says James Delingpole, a hilariously witty British journalist, in the film. “With general elections it doesn't really matter who you vote for, Conservative or Labor, because you know that in four years time you can change your mind. This time, you can't change your mind.” Numerous other entertaining and knowledgeable experts, journalists, economists, politicians, authors, and EU critics interviewed for the film explain why the people of Britain must seize the chance to regain their independence and their liberties.   
The documentary does a great job exposing the sinister underside of EU policymaking — it happens completely outside of public scrutiny, and is essentially impossible for citizens to stop. Among other clever strategies for illustrating that, the filmmakers show people on the street photographs of top EU bosses. “Do you recognize this man?” they ask. Of course, nobody does.
Other questions include ones asking passers-by whether they know the difference between the European Council, the Council of Europe, and the Council of the European Union. Obviously, the response from everyone is confusion at best. Essentially, the EU is an impenetrable morass of out-of-control bureaucracy. It is also a monster at odds with the fundamental principles of liberty and Western civilization. And the film makes that abundantly clear in a funny, entertaining, and powerful way.  
Even British lawmakers interviewed in the film admit they do not understand how the EU system works. One parliamentarian, David Davis, compares the EU's bureaucracy to a “priesthood that knows how it all works.” “The rest of us ordinary citizens don't know how it works,” he said, adding that it leads to a “massive transfer of power.”
And that is the point: The architects of the regime did not want everyday people to understand it. As journalist and author Janet Daley explains in the film, “It was devised so that the great mass of the people could not control government, ever again.” The implications of that fact alone ought to be more than enough to persuade people to rise up and vote for secession. But that's only the beginning.        
Another key element of the film is the highlighting of the economic destruction wrought on the British economy by EU laws and regulations. “Fortress Europe,” as the narrator refers to the super-state, has been a “calamity” to the European economy. That is backed up by great amounts of evidence.  
In particular, the movie shows how eurocrats in Brussels helped to crush the livelihoods of countless British fishermen, who for centuries have fished the waters of the British isles. Remarkably, the EU has even started paying British ex-fishermen with tax money to allow their boats to be destroyed. Also under threat because of the EU are British exporters in everything from candy to heavy manufacturing. With interviews of the EU's economic victims, the film does a magnificent job of putting a human face on the massive tragedy the EU has inflicted.
Eurocrats, by contrast, do quite well for themselves. Among other perks, the armies of faceless bureaucrats and other busybodies earn massively bloated salaries, absurd benefits, gargantuan “expense” accounts, and much more, living a life of luxury that the everyday taxpayers who fund it all could not even begin to contemplate.
The film gives a brief overview of these benefits, and suggests that it is one of the reasons why support for the EU is so fervent among the political and bureaucratic classes that benefit from the arrangements. Watching it all roll by on film, the parallels between the lifestyles and attitudes of the EU's ruling classes and those of the communist elite in China or the Soviet Union are hard to ignore.
Just as importantly, the eurocrats have become masters at strategically buying support for their machinations with other people's money. The EU “diverts great rivers of taxpayers' cash to the tax-consuming middle class intelligentsia in our sprawling publicly funded establishment,” the narrator of the film observes.
“The European Union is very good at purchasing the loyalty of powerful and articulate interests in all the member states,” says Daniel Hannan, a member of the European pseudo-“Parliament” with the U.K. Independence Party and a leading critic of the super-state. “What we see here is really a racket.” Numerous others echo those concerns.  
Indeed, massive amounts of taxpayer funding are showered on everything from museums and universities to lobbying groups and charities. That provides a built-in layer of support for the EU, of course, but is a huge burden on those unwittingly forced to fund it — not to mention inimical to the interests of everyday citizens.
Showcasing an EU-funded opera house in the Northeast Britain, for example, the film points out that for every one pound of EU funding returned to the area, taxpayers fork over almost 2.5 pounds to Brussels. In short, massive taxation without representation to fund propaganda and useless support-buying projects.            
The film also touches on Britain's history. Despite the successful uprising by American colonists against the British crown, it is true that Britain has been responsible for some of humanity's greatest advances in individual liberty. The Brexit movie highlights, among other examples, the world-famous Magna Carta. Also highlighted is the rise of the principle that the people must consent to taxes and government through elected representatives before they can be legitimate. Under the EU, over a thousand years of traditions in liberty and self-government pioneered by the Anglo-Saxon world are in mortal danger — at least on the British Isles.  
The Brexit film highlights another major potential danger emerging from the EU's machinations: the rise of totalitarian extremism, ranging from radical leftists and communists to racist and fascist forces that some of the film's interviewees mistakenly refer to as “far-right.” (Having collectivist tyranny such as fascism and socialism on opposite ends of a political spectrum makes no logical sense, as it leaves no place on the spectrum for liberty and limited government). In the documentary, footage of frightening fascist-style marches with Nazi-style symbols, uniforms, and torches overlaid with eerie music is sure to leave a lasting impression on viewers.    
If there can be any criticism of the film, it is that it does not properly explain the shadowy globalist establishment — the Council on Foreign Relations, the Bilderberg group, and other like-minded outfits — that has publicly boasted of its crucial role in foisting the super-state on Europeans. Without understanding the powers behind the EU, it is hard to understand the real agenda, and why it is so crucial that Europeans, and the British in particular, fight back. The film also provides no mention of the well-documented role of the U.S. government, via the CIA and other agencies, in imposing the scheme on Europeans. Nor is the deception that was used given its due.
Unfortunately, the film also relies heavily on the term “democracy,” a system of government America's Founders rejected as unstable mob rule that jeopardizes individual rights — God-given rights that the Founders believed should be protected by law under a republican form of government. The film could have instead used better terminology to describe what is really at stake: self-government, democratic accountability, the rule of law, decentralized power, individual liberty, and so on.
The movie also leaves out some of the more terrifying anti-democratic elements of the EU, including its ongoing efforts to build itself a military loyal only to Brussels that would enforce its decrees, beyond the control of the people. Such a force would be an extreme danger, yet the EU's efforts to usurp control of Britain's armed forces are not addressed.  
Still, despite those failings, the film does a masterful job of showing Britons and other Europeans why they must urgently and decisively reject the EU — at least if they hope to retain any semblance of liberty, nationhood, self-government, and prosperity. After seeing the devastating indictment of the EU, it is hard to imagine any argument that could persuade any logical person (who did not hate freedom and prosperity) that Britain should remain shackled to the totalitarian super-state. That means the film successfully accomplishes what its makers and funders set out to do: truthfully expose the EU in an entertaining, easy-to-understand way, such that the people of Britain will realize the necessity of secession.   
The film is a must-see for every European, whether they live in the United Kingdom or not. If enough Europeans see it, the EU will almost certainly collapse amid a public uprising. There is not enough tax-funded propaganda in the world that could prop up the autocratic super-state in the face of the truth so eloquently showcased in the film.
As the Obama administration and establishment Republicans in Congress attempt to shackle Americans to the EU super-state via the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP), even the people of the United States should see it. The film would be an excellent warning of why America should avoid like the plague any entangling alliances with the regime in Brussels.
In short, Brexit: The Movie could be a very valuable tool for throwing a monkey wrench into the globalist agenda. And it's available for free on the Internet. Use it.
Related articles: