Translate

Friday, May 3, 2013

PENTAGON CONFIRMS MAY COURT MARTIAL SOLDIERS WHO SHARE CHRISTIAN FAITH






VERY IMPORTANT-See 59 minute YouTube video prevented from being uploaded: 
Text with this video in full below:

Published on May 2, 2013
Thursday, May 02, 2013 Radio commentator Steve Quayle and Rick discuss the appalling new Pentagon policy muzzling Christian members of the Armed Forces from talking about Jesus Christ to other soldiers.

The issue surfaced after activist Mikey Weinstein of the Military Religion Freedom organization www.militaryreligiousfreedom.org, and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_L._Weinstein, met with department officials and then wrote that Christians in the military are "monsters" who must be stopped from talking about their faith.


Weinstein had declared: "We face incredibly well-funded gangs of fundamentalist Christian monsters who terrorize their fellow Americans by forcing their weaponized and twisted version of Christianity upon their helpless subordinates in our nation's armed forces."

In an interview with Fox News, Weinstein said the military needs to begin prosecuting Christians who share their faith.

"Someone needs to be punished for this," he said. "Until the Air Force or Army or Navy or Marine Corps punishes a member of the military for unconstitutional religious proselytizing and oppression, we will never have the ability to stop this horrible, horrendous, dehumanizing behavior."

It seemed the military was listening.

After a private meeting between Weinstein and Pentagon officials April 23, a Pentagon spokesman declared, "Religious proselytization is not permitted within the Department of Defense."
[See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proselytize]

Weinstein, according to Fox News' Todd Starnes, told officials at the meeting that U.S. troops who evangelize are guilty of sedition and treason and should be punished, by the hundreds if necessary.

But leaders of the Washington-based Family Research Council, which recently faced a violent attack by a leftist who said his goal was to kill as many people as he could, said the Pentagon's apparent intent to punish evangelism makes no sense.

"Why would military leadership be meeting with one of the most rabid atheists in America to discuss religious freedom in the military," asked FRC President Tony Perkins in a Fox News interview. "That's like consulting with China on how to improve human rights."

Retired Lt. Gen. William Boykin, a vice president at FRC, said such a policy would allow Christians within the military who speak of their faith to be "prosecuted as enemies of the state."

"This has the potential to destroy military recruiting across the services as Americans realize that their faith will be suppressed by joining the military," Boykin said.

"Our brave troops deserve better. If chaplains and other personnel are censored from offering the full solace of the Gospel, there is no religious freedom in the military."

FRC launched a petition urging the Pentagon to scrub plans to censor religious beliefs.

The FRC petition states: "Our brave troops deserve better. Subverting the religious freedom of our troops both hurts the morale of our troops and puts our nation at risk by labeling courageous military personnel as enemies.

"I urge you to resist the demands of anti-Christian activists who are calling for a court-martial order upon chaplains and service members who share their faith," the petition says.

Tens of thousands of Americans joined the effort, which was brought about, according to FRC, because of claims that "religion is one of the chief problems plaguing our troops."

Some have said, FRC points out, that "religious proselytizing" is "at the top of the list of problems in the armed forces -- even on par with sexual assault."

The FRC noted the Washington Post reported that the Air Force had created a document "with the directive that leaders of all levels (including chaplains) may not 'promote their personal religious beliefs to their subordinates or to extend preferential treatment for any religion.'"

Ron Crews of the Chaplain Alliance for Religious Liberty told Starnes: "Saying that a service member cannot speak of his faith is like telling a service member he cannot talk about his spouse or children. I do not think the Air Force wants to ban personnel from protected religious speech."

However, Weinstein told the Washington Post that such conversation is a national security threat and "sedition and treason."

Ken Klukowski, a senior fellow for religious liberty at FRC, noted that Weinstein cites Focus on the Family founder James Dobson as "illustrating the extremist, militant nature of these virulently homophobic organizations' rhetorically charged propaganda."

Weinstein concludes: "Let's call these ignoble actions what they are: the senseless and cowardly squallings of human monsters."

Kulkowski pointed out that Weinstein endorses the Southern Poverty Law Center, which publishes a list of "hate groups" that lump together Christian organizations such as FRC with the Ku Klux Klan.
_________________________________________________________________________

Mikey Weinstein of http://www.militaryreligiousfreedom.org/, issues a vicious and venomous tirade against "dominionist" fundamentalist Christianity on November 8, 2011: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VfNejAE06Bc.
_________________________________________________________________________

Here Weinstein condemns "Christian crusaders" in the military:
__________________________________________________________________________
Weinstein is afraid that fundamentalist Christianity will precipitate a "nuclear exchange:
__________________________________________________________________________

Weinstein believes the military has been infiltrated by Christian evangelists in this 25 minute video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2zLxcMuiO_E.
__________________________________________________________________________

Finally, Weinstein wrote a vitriolic tirade against Christians at the Huffington Post here, titled 

"Fundamentalist Christian Monsters: Papa's Got A Brand New Bag"

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michael-l-weinstein/fundamentalist-christian-_b_3072651.html.
__________________________________________________________________________

From Christian News Network: 

Pentagon Responds to Concerns Over Proposed Punishment for Superiors Who Proselytize Subordinates

Weinstein is quoted as saying in the above article the following:
“Someone needs to be punished for this,” he said. “Until the Air Force or Army or Navy or Marine Corps punishes a member of the military for unconstitutional religious proselytizing and oppression, we will never have the ability to stop this horrible, horrendous, dehumanizing behavior.” “It is a version of being spiritually raped and you are being spiritually raped by fundamentalist Christian religious predators” “We would love to see hundreds of prosecutions to stop this outrage of fundamentalist religious persecution.”
__________________________________________________________








ATTORNEY GENERAL ERIC HOLDER THREATENS STATE OF KANSAS IN LETTER ON GUN CONTROL NULLIFICATION LAW



KANSAS:
Second Amendment Protection Act; SB 102 establishes the Second Amendment Protection Act. First, the bill excludes from federal regulation any personal firearm, firearm accessory, or ammunition manufactured commercially or privately and owned in Kansas. The bill provides that for as long as any such personal firearm, firearm accessory, or ammunition remains within theborders of Kansas, it is not subject to any federal law, regulation, or authority. Second, the bill prevents any federal agent or contracted employee, any state employee, or any local authority from enforcing any federal regulation or law governing any personal firearm, firearm accessory, or ammunition manufactured commercially or privately and owned in Kansas, provided it remains within the borders of Kansas. In the process of a criminal prosecution, the bill precludes any arrest or detention prior to a trial for a violation of the Act. Finally, the bill allows a county or district attorney or the Attorney General to seek injunctive relief in court to enjoin certain federal officials from enforcing federal law regarding a firearm, a firearm accessory, or ammunition that is manufactured commercially or privately and owned in the state of Kansas and that remains within the borders of Kansas.



Governor to AG Holder: Kansans hold dear the right to keep & bear arms

Topeka - Kansas Governor Sam Brownback sent the following letter Thursday to U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder in response to his letter regarding the state's Second Amendment Protection Act:


May 2, 2013
Attorney General Eric Holder
Office of the Attorney GeneralWashington, DC 20530
Dear Attorney General Holder:
            The State of Kansas is in receipt of your letter in which you place Kansas on notice regarding the view of the Obama Administration concerning the state’s Second Amendment Protection Act.  
 The right to keep and bear arms is a right that Kansans hold dear.  It is a right enshrined not only in the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution, but also protected by the Kansas Bill of Rights.  The people of Kansas have repeatedly and overwhelmingly reaffirmed their commitment to protecting this fundamental right.  The people of Kansas are likewise committed to defending the sovereignty of the State of Kansas as guaranteed in the Ninth and Tenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.  
The state’s Second Amendment Protection Act, which expressly restates our commitment to these rights, was approved by wide, bi-partisan margins in the Kansas Legislature.  The measure was adopted by a vote of 35 to 4 in the Kansas Senate with the Democrat Senate Minority Leader supporting the bill.  The measure was adopted by a vote of 96 to 24 in the Kansas House of Representatives.  Again, the Democrat House Minority Leader voted for the bill.  This is not a partisan issue in Kansas.  
The people of Kansas have clearly expressed their sovereign will.  It is my hope that upon further review, you will see their right to do so.
Sincerely,
Sam Brownback
Governor


ONMYHONOR.NET'S JOHN STEMBERGER ON HOMOSEXUALITY IN THE BOY SCOUTS

John Stemberger's "OnMy Honor.net http://www.onmyhonor.net/, is campaigning to prevent homosexuals and homosexuality in the Boy Scouts. Please support them.


An Open Letter from OnMyHonor.net:
A Legal and Ethical Analysis of the Proposed BSA Resolution
to Allow Open Homosexuality in the Boy Scouts
1) The proposed BSA resolution is logically incoherent and morally and ethically inconsistent. Under the proposed change in policy, open homosexuality would be officially consistent with the Scouting code throughout a Boy Scout’s life until the moment he turns 18, when it suddenly becomes a problem. Under the policy when a 16- or 17-year-old “open and avowed” homosexual becomes an Eagle before his 18th birthday, right after he turns 18 he is removed from Scouting.  No troop leader would want to put himself in the position of enforcing such an irrational rule.  A de facto change in the rule against openly homosexual adult leaders would also occur almost immediately. This inconsistency between the membership policy of youth and adults will surely draw an equal protection lawsuit by gay-rights activists groups against the BSA in which the association rights established by the Supreme Court will no longer be available. (See #7 infra.)
2) Opening the Boy Scouts to boys who openly proclaim being sexually attracted to other boys and/or openly identify themselves as “gay” will inevitably create an increase of boy-on-boy sexual contact which will result in further public scandal to the BSA, not to mention the tragedy of countless boys who will experience sexual, physical and psychological abuse. BSA’s own Youth Protection videos indicate that “70% of abuse to boys is by teenagers”. Two-deep leadership will have to be at least three-deep for units with homosexual youth. The complexity of sleeping arrangements will create a myriad of social and liability challenges. Sexual awareness and harassment training will be required in all Scouting units.  The leaders setting forth the proposed policy clearly did not have the safety and security of the boys in the BSA as their paramount concern.
3) The proposal forces and requires every chartered Scouting unit, regardless of religious convictions, to facilitate open homosexuality among boys in their program. The proposed resolution is much worse than the original idea for a local option where each troop would decide whether to allow open homosexuality in its unit. It fails to respect or reverence the religious beliefs, values and theology of the vast majority of Christian churches which charter well over 70% of all Scouting units.
4) If the proposal is enacted, it will gut a major percentage of human capital in the BSA and utterly devastate the program financially, socially and legally. Of the faith based Scouting units, the vast majority of them are Latter-day Saints, Methodists, Catholics or Southern Baptists. Despite what denominations may decide for political reasons, the majority of local churches that charter Scout units will not be able to embrace this policy without violating their religious convictions. The BSA’s own “Voice of the Scout” surveys provide solid evidence that tens- and possibly hundreds of thousands of parents and Scouts will leave the program if the proposal is adopted. The financial impact from such a significant membership loss would be enormous. Camps will close, executives will be let go and properties will be sold off as a result of the vast loss of finances from major donors, private foundations and declining membership.
5) The Resolution robs parents of the sole authority to raise issues of sex and sexuality with their kids. Parents should have the exclusive right to raise issues about sex and sexuality with their children in their own time and in their own way, in the privacy of their homes; not brought up by other older boys around a campfire. Allowing open homosexuality would inject a sensitive and highly-charged political issue into the heart of the BSA, against the wishes of the vast majority of parents. Under the longstanding current policy, boys who have a same-sex attraction are not banned or removed from the program unless they act out in a manner that distracts from the mission of the BSA. Under the new policy all Scouting units would be required to accept a 17-year-old gay activist openly flaunting his sexuality and promoting a leftist political agenda.
6) The proposed policy directly contradicts the BSA’s comprehensive 2010-2012 study which unanimously concluded last summer that prohibiting “open and avowed homosexuality” was “the absolute best policy” for the Boy Scouts.  Only months after the BSA affirmed the policy that was clearly in the best interest of its boys, a handful of top BSA officials caved from the pressure and criticism they received from their own adult peers. What kind of message are we sending to young people when the adults trying to teach them to be “brave” cannot muster up the courage to stand up for the values that are clearly best for the BSA? Sadly, instead of looking out for what is best for the safety and security of the boys in the program, BSA’s top leadership is more concerned about what is popular in the polls taken outside the Scouting family. To try to undermine the results of the unanimous 2012 study, the 2013 Voice of the Scout national survey was a carefully crafted tool to persuade and “condition” those surveyed to the idea of openly gay BSA members.  The full survey results were not even reported publicly or to the wider Scouting family.
7) The proposed resolution leaves Scouting units with no options or legal protection if they refuse to allow open homosexuality among the boys of their units. This proposed policy completely retreats from the principles hard-fought in the U.S. Supreme Court case BSA vs. Dale in 2000. The legal protection under Dale will be completely removed for both adults and youth members. Any Scout unit which refuses to accept or abide by the new policy will either have their charter revoked by national BSA leadership or become fully exposed to legal attacks for alleged violations of nondiscrimination ordinances. Many units and chartering organizations will be forced to fold, unable to withstand the enormous time and cost associated with the legal attacks.
8) The effect of the phrase “sexual preference” in the BSA resolution could be used by LGBT activists to push for transgendered girls in the BSA. If a biological girl “prefers” acting out as a transgendered boy, she must also be allowed into any Boy Scout troop. In October of 2011 the Girl Scouts admitted a 7-year-old boy named Bobby Montoya into their program who preferred to be treated as a girl. Because the vague and undefined phrase “sexual preference” is used in the resolution, it opens the door and requires Scout units to accept any sexual preference expressed.
9) The “whereas” clauses in the resolution are symbolic and not part of the actual proposed policy. While the Resolution includes some positive “Whereas” clauses designed to take the edge off of the new membership policy language by advocating for some type of moral purity, “Whereas” clauses have never been binding in contract law or in the legal construction of a resolution. The only words that will become part of the official membership policy are the 141 words after “NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT…”
10) Top BSA leaders completely ignored the collective wisdom of rank-and-file Scouting family members when they proposed this resolution. Nationwide the BSA’s official “Voice of the Scout” survey shows respondents support the current policy by a supermajority of 61% to 34%. This survey also showed:
  • 3 of the 4 major BSA Regions around the country collectively voted that they did not want to see a change in the policy.
  • 72 percent of chartered organizations oppose this change and support the current policy.
  • 64 percent of council and district volunteers oppose this change and support the current policy.
  • 62 percent of unit leaders oppose this change and support the current policy.
  • 61 percent of Boy Scout parents oppose this change and support the current policy.
  • 50 percent of Cub Scout parents oppose this change and support the current policy.
John Stemberger is an Eagle Scout, a Vigil Honor member of the Order of the Arrow, a former Scoutmaster, a Lifetime N.E.S.A. member and a father with two sons in Scouting.  He is an AV-rated Orlando lawyer who practices in civil and constitutional litigation.
Additional Legal Opinions:
“Boy Scouts Produce Incoherent Policy on Gays”, by Ken Klukowski, Legal Analyst, Author and Law Professor
“The Boy Scouts’ Ill-Considered Proposal to Revise Its Membership Policy on Homosexuals”, by Ed Whelan, attorney and a former law clerk to Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia
Text of the Proposed Resolution
Membership Standards and Executive Summary
__________________________________________________________________________
The following YouTube videos are presented in order from short to long duration:








Thursday, May 2, 2013

THE TREE OF CONTEMPLATIVE PRACTICES

    From The Center For Contemplative Mind in Society, which Mirabai Bush co-founded, is this tree of all the practices related to contemplative mysticism which has its roots in Buddhism and Hinduism and which is being introduced into the workplace and the schools. See: http://www.contemplativemind.org/practices/tree. Click on picture to enlarge:





THE ANCIENT PAGAN PRACTICE OF BUDDHIST MINDFULNESS IN THE WORKPLACE

Mindfulness@Work


Learn why some of the most progressive companies in the world such as Apple, Google, Ebay, Carlsberg, Sony and Harvard Business School are using Mindfulness training in the Workplace. Charlotte Thaarup of Creative Transformations speaks about how mindfulness training combines ancient practices with neuroscience and helps the brain access it's greater potential:
 

Multitasking vs Mindfulness: "A Great Way to Reboot" (her words, not ours):
 
We have previously posted a number of articles about the Buddhist practice of Mindfulness on this blog. The business world is also well into using and promoting these New Age practices thanks to Rick Warren's mentor, Peter Drucker and his School of Management and the likes of Mirabai Bush http://www.morethansound.net/authors.php?aid=21,
author of "Working With Mindfulness"
http://www.morethansound.net/store/mindfulness/training-and-practice/working-with-mindfulness-cd/prod_290.html.
Mirabai Bush: http://www.mirabaibush.com/:
Biography of Mirabai Bush from her website above:
Mirabai Bush was a co-founder of the Center for Contemplative Mind in Society http://www.contemplativemind.org/, and served as Executive Director there until 2008. Under her direction, The Center developed its programs in education, law, business, and activism and its network of thousands of people integrating contemplative practice and perspective into their lives and work.  Mirabai holds a unique background of organizational management, teaching, and spiritual practice. A founding board member of the Seva Foundation, an international public health organization, she directed the Seva Guatemala Project, which supports sustainable agriculture and integrated community development. Also at Seva, she co-developed Sustaining Compassion, Sustaining the Earth, a series of retreats and events for grassroots environmental activists on the interconnection of spirit and action. She is co-author, with Ram Dass, of Compassion in Action: Setting Out on the Path of Service, published by Random House.Mirabai has organized, facilitated, and taught workshops, weekends, and courses on spirit and action for more than 20 years at institutions including Omega Institute, Naropa Institute, Findhorne, Zen Mountain Monastery, University of Massachusetts, San Francisco Zen Center, Buddhist Study Center at Barre, MA, Insight Meditation Society, and the Lama Foundation. She has a special interest in the uncovering and recovery of women’s spiritual wisdom to inform work for social change. She has taught women’s groups with Clarissa Pinkola Estes, Sharon Salzberg, Joan Halifax, Margo Adler, Starhawk, Jean Shinoda Bolen, Vicky Noble, and other leaders.Her spiritual studies include meditation study at the Burmese Vihara in Bodh Gaya, India, with Shri S.N. Goenka and Anagarika Munindra; bhakti yoga with Hindu teacher Neemkaroli Baba; and studies with Tibetan lamas Kalu Rinpoche, Chogyam Trungpa Rinpoche, Kyabje Gehlek Rinpoche, Tsoknyi Rinpoche, and others. She also did five years of intensive practice in Iyengar yoga and five years of Aikido with Kanai Sensei. Her earlier religious study included 20 years of Catholic schooling, ending with Georgetown University graduate study in medieval literature. She holds an ABD in American literature from the State University of New York at Buffalo.Before entering the foundation world, Mirabai was the first professional woman to work on the Saturn-Apollo moonflight at Cape Canaveral and later co-founded and directed Illuminations, Inc., from 1973 to 1985 in Cambridge, MA. Her innovative business approaches, based on mindfulness practice, were reported in Newsweek, Inc., Fortune, and the Boston Business Journal. She has also worked on educational programs with inner-city youth of color. Mirabai has trekked, traveled, and lived in many countries, including Guatemala, Mexico, Costa Rica, India, Nepal, Morocco, Ireland, England, Scotland, Afghanistan, Iran, Turkey, Germany, Austria, Italy, Pakistan, and the Caribbean. She is an organic gardener in Western Massachusetts and the mother of one adult son, Owen.
________________________________________________________________________
Interview with Mirabai Bush at the Secular Buddhist Association: http://secularbuddhism.org/2013/02/17/episode-156-mirabai-bush-the-center-for-contemplative-mind-in-society/, and the link below to the MP3 audio:
Interview with Mirabai Bush about her influence on Google: http://shamashalidina.com/2012/08/google-uses-mindfulness-with-mirabai-bush/.
________________________________________________________________________

    See these two short YouTube videos which won't upload to this blog, just like a lot of other politically sensitive and/or politically incorrect subjects:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IlRix12kqDc, and http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mHsMan_vauA, the latter titled "Google's Search Inside Yourself (with) Adviser Mirabai Bush"
    The UCSD Center for Mindfulness has an article about the workplace: http://ucsdcfm.wordpress.com/2012/12/11/the-truly-mindful-workplace-a-reality-whose-moment-is-arriving/?blogsub=confirming#blog_subscription-4.
    Personnel Today has this article: http://www.personneltoday.com/articles/01/05/2013/59148/how-practising-mindfulness-in-the-workplace-can-boost.htm#.UYJM9bV1-p8.
    Mindfulness Works has this article: http://www.mindfulness-works.com/.
    The Mindful Center has this article: http://www.themindfulcenter.com/corporate-training-new-mexico/mindfulness-based-workplace-workshops-2/.
 

ANOTHER PASTOR FAILS: DELAWARE REFORMED PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH AGAINST MARRIAGE EQUALITY BILL BECOMES FOCUS OF TURMOIL

The darling pastor of Delaware's airways, Dr. Chuck Betters of Glasgow "Reformed" Presbyterian Church of Glasgow/Bear, Delaware has backed down on the biblical explanation of traditional marriage and failed to state the biblical case against it, when he had a prime opportunity to do so. This is very similar to Louie Giglio's failure to stand for traditional marriage when he was disinvited by Obama from the Inauguration in January 2103. He, likewise, had a prime opportunity but cowardly backed off from defending biblical marriage and instead he explained that he hasn't talked about homosexuality for 15 or more years. These high profile pastors may think they are loved and adored by their sycophants, but not by God. See the following article:



Here is the official statement of apology by pastor Dr. Chuck Betters to the homosexual community from Glasgow "Reformed" Presbyterian Church in Delaware which is at least gay welcoming. Bold type is ours:

Glasgow Church on Redefining Marriage

In light of the debate surrounding the Marriage Equality Act in Delaware
and in view of the disturbance some experienced over a recent post on 
our church sign

the Glasgow Church offers the following position on the matter:
The Scriptures are our sole authority and drive our positions on all matters. Where 
culture clashes with Scripture we will always land on the clear teaching of the Bible.
The life, death, burial and resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead offers 
forgiveness from all sin to those who trust in Him and in Him alone for their 
salvation. This includes all sin whether gay or straight.
While we stand in opposition to the Marriage Equality Act on both theological 
and legal grounds, we condemn all hate speech and lack of civility in the debate 
on the part of both sides.
Glasgow Church loves and welcomes all people regardless of their sexuality. 
Homosexual sin is no different than heterosexual sin in God’s eyes. Both kinds 
of sins are defined in the Scriptures and both can be forgiven at the cross.
Glasgow Church has entered into the debate because the church is to have an 
influence on our culture. After all, we are called to be salt and light. Just as 
churches differing with us have expressed their support of the bill, Glasgow 
Church has the same right to express our opposition to it.
The recent sign posting was not intended to offend anyone in the gay community. 
We apologize if it did. It was only meant to say that the cross of Jesus Christ is 
greater than any political position one might hold on this matter. Regardless of 
the outcome on the Marriage Equality Act, Glasgow Church believes that what 
trumps all political ideologies is the finished work of Jesus Christ on the cross. 
It was certainly not meant to exclude gays or lesbians from attending Glasgow 
Church given that some who are gay or lesbian already do attend and love being here. 
Regretfully, there is ample hurt and pain on both sides to go around. We encourage 
those who differ with us to respect our right to hold our positions just as we will 
respect your right to disagree with us.
If you would like to have a free download of my sermons on this matter feel free to 
do so at www.glasgowchurch.com and click on “Marriage According to the Scriptures” 
link. There are two parts dated 4/21 and 4/28.
Please know, we are opposed to the Marriage Equality Act. But our opposition will 
never intentionally resort to name-calling and incivility.
After the two part sermon series on the redefinition of marriage bill, I will conduct a Q and A 
on Sunday May 5th from 9:00-10:15 AM in the church library. All adults are invited to attend. 
There will be activities for the children as well. We will seek to answer any and all questions 
that may have arisen from the series. Those who favor the bill are also invited to attend.
My desire is that our church will welcome any and all people, regardless of their politics and/or 
sexuality, who wish to attend. We will treat the professed homosexual with the same dignity 
and respect with which we treat the heterosexual. Regardless of one’s sin, whether 
homosexual acts or heterosexual acts, we echo the words of our Savior spoken to the woman 
who was caught in adultery, we do not condemn you. Now rise, (and most importantly) go 
and sin no more.
In His Grip,
Dr. Chuck Betters



ZALKIN LAW FIRM ADDED TO OUR BLOG FOR ABUSE LEGAL REPRESENTATION

We have just added Zalkin Law Firm to our blog for the benefit of those who might need legal representation regarding abuse. According to their website, www.zalkin.com, nine areas of abuse and personal injury are their specialties. This is not an endorsement and/or recommendation. It is the sole responsibility of the person to examine whether or not this law firm would be suitable for the person and the situation. This law firm has offices in California and New York City.