TEENS NEED PERMISSION TO SEE R-RATED PRO-LIFE MOVIE, BUT NOT FOR AN ABORTION~MULTIPLE STATES HAVE NO LAWS ON PARENTAL PERMISSION FOR AN ABORTION

TEENS NEED PERMISSION TO SEE R-RATED 

PRO-LIFE MOVIE, BUT NOT FOR AN ABORTION~

MULTIPLE STATES HAVE NO LAWS 

ON PARENTAL PERMISSION FOR AN ABORTION

BY BEN WARREN

SEE: https://www.newswars.com/teens-need-permission-to-see-r-rated-pro-life-movie-but-not-for-an-abortion/; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:

The creators of a pro-life movie are slamming the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) for the irony that a teen would need a parental guardian to view their film but not actually need one for an abortion.

The prohibitive rating of Unplanned is ironic on multiple levels, according to Cary Solomon and Chuck Konzelman, the film’s writers and directors.

“Unplanned is an ‘R’ rated film which has no MPAA cautions for profanity, nudity, sex or violence… Except for violence directly associated with the abortion process,” they said. “Ironically, the MPAA seems to be indirectly endorsing the pro-life position: namely that abortion is an act of violence.”

“Even more ironically, as a result of the MPAA’s decision to give us a ‘Restricted’ rating, many teenage women in this country who can legally obtain an actual abortion without parental permission will be prohibited from going to see our film containing simulated images of abortion, without obtaining parental permission.”

Those “simulated images” were the MPAA’s official rationale for the rating as well as the film’s “some disturbing/bloody images” descriptor.

An MPAA spokesman denied accusations that politics played a role in the rating and the company’s website makes it clear that their system is always “evolving” according to the sensitivities of American parents.

Interestingly, there has already been several 2019 movies rated PG-13 portraying violent murder and drug content, Alita: Battle Angel and Miss Bala, respectively.

Filmed in secret to dodge Planned Parenthood activists, Unplanned is based on a true story about an employee of the organization becoming a pro-life advocate.

Solomon and Konzelman have chosen to see the bright side of the decision and have yet to file a formal appeal against the MPAA.

“Maybe it’s all for the best: As the wife of our lead film attorney put it: ‘This is a movie that every mother of a teenage girl needs to take her daughter by the hand and go see with her.’ So as far as we’re concerned, ‘R’ means ‘Recommended.’”

Moreover, violence against the unborn even warranting such a rating seems to conflict with Hollywood’s stance on the act, notes Producer Daryl C. Lefever.

“We really thought we had made a PG-13 film,” he said. “There is no violence, no nudity, no sex, no profanity, and the only violence takes place in the womb, which most Hollywood folks don’t think is a person.”

Pro-life and anti-censorship views are making major waves in America after Alex Jones addressed both in great detail during his groundbreaking appearance on Joe Rogan’s podcast.

Alex Jones “broke the internet” when he made a surprise appearance on the “Joe Rogan Experience” where he made a now viral rant on abortion.

IF I WERE THE DEVIL: PAUL HARVEY’S 1965 WARNING TO AMERICA COMES TRUE

Alex Jones explains how the epic speech has become reality

SEE: https://www.infowars.com/if-i-were-the-devil-paul-harveys-1965-warning-to-america-comes-true/; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:

Alex Jones breaks down a special report highlighting the prophetic 1965 speech by Paul Harvey, explaining how the devil deceives humanity.

On the 10 year anniversary of Harvey’s death, Jones explains how the words he spoke over 50 years ago capture the essence of the fight between good and evil. Watch the report without Jones’ introduction below:

TWITTER NOW ENFORCING SHARIA LAW ON AMERICANS?

TWITTER NOW ENFORCING SHARIA LAW 

ON AMERICANS?

Michelle Malkin warned of legal repercussions by Twitter over four-year-old tweet of Muhammad cartoons

BY KELEN MCBREEN

SEE: https://www.infowars.com/twitter-now-enforcing-sharia-law-on-americans/; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:

Conservative commentator Michelle Malkin received a notice from Twitter’s legal team Wednesday, warning that she may wish to seek legal counsel over a four-year-old tweet the social media site says “is in violation of Pakistani law.”

“Here’s the notice Twitter’s legal dept sent me last week, warning me to get legal counsel because anti-blasphemy Muslim zealots complained that my Mohammed Cartoons tweet violates Pakistan’s laws,” Malkin wrote.

View image on Twitter

Michelle Malkin

✔@michellemalkin

I've been #SiliconValleySharia -ed. Here's the notice Twitter's legal dept sent me last week, warning me to get legal counsel because anti-blasphemy Muslim zealots complained that my Mohammed Cartoons tweet violates Pakistan's laws.http://michellemalkin.com/2019/02/26/ive-been-silicon-valley-sharia-ed/ …@miss9afi @Imamofpeace

6,218

9:10 AM - Feb 27, 2019

6,518 people are talking about this

Twitter Ads info and privacy

In defiance of Pakistani law and in support of free speech, see the forbidden images below.

View image on Twitter

Michelle Malkin

✔@michellemalkin

Here: The Mohammed Cartoons & other riot-inducing images #cartoonjihad #CharlieHebdo ==> http://michellemalkin.com/2015/01/09/the-mohammed-cartoons-and-other-riot-inducing-images/ …

1,891

4:39 PM - Jan 9, 2015

2,210 people are talking about this

Twitter Ads info and privacy

This is only the latest example of blatant hypocrisy from Twitter as conservatives are disproportionately targeted while pornography, death threats and other clear violations of the site’s terms of service are ignored.

Malkin isn’t the only one being targeted as multiple Twitter users have recently been contacted by Twitter’s legal team regarding posts about Islam.

In an interview with Big League Politics, Malkin explained, “Over the past few months, several other prominent critics of Islamic extremism have received similar warning letters from Twitter’s legal department, including Saudi-Canadian activist Ensaf Haidar, the wife of imprisoned Saudi blogger Raif Badawi; Imam Mohammad Tawhidi, an Iranian-born Muslim scholar and reform advocate from Australia; Jamie Glazov, a Russian-born Canadian columnist who just released a new book called “Jihadist Psychopath”; and Pamela Geller, an anti-jihad blogger and activist.”

In November of 2018, conservative activist Laura Loomer was banned from Twitter for criticizing Muslim Democrat Ilhan Omar’s support of female genital mutilation.

Malkin could be the next conservative to be permanently kicked off the platform as she is refusing to cower to the site’s intimidation tactics.

She writes, “As a US citizen subject to AMERICA’S laws—NOT Pakistan’s or Mohammed’s—I’ll now retweet my Mo cartoons & columns to 2.1 million followers every day & stand with free speech & free thought.”

Michelle Malkin

✔@michellemalkin

Replying to @michellemalkin and 3 others

As a US citizen subject to AMERICA'S laws—NOT Pakistan’s or Mohammed’s—I’ll now retweet my Mo cartoons & columns to 2.1 million followers every day & stand with free speech & free thought. How about you, @Twitter @jack?http://michellemalkin.com/2015/01/09/the-mohammed-cartoons-and-other-riot-inducing-images/ …#FuckSharia pic.twitter.com/ZLFLMcVvZp

9,053

10:07 AM - Feb 27, 2019

Twitter Ads info and privacy

6,228 people are talking about this

Michelle Malkin

✔@michellemalkin

Replying to @michellemalkin and 2 others

I have written to Twitter's legal & media relations departments seeking answers and comment on why American citizens who use their service are now subject to Pakistan's oppressive anti-blasphemy laws. No response yet - hi @jack can you respond==>#SiliconValleySharia pic.twitter.com/aApeMTYR5d

4,880

9:58 AM - Feb 27, 2019

Twitter Ads info and privacy

3,187 people are talking about this

Share this article to show big tech that Americans won’t be bullied into submission and that the First Amendment is still alive.

On the topic of internet censorship, Project Veritas’ James O’Keefe joined the Alex Jones Show Wednesday to promote a recent video exposing Facebook’s anti-free speech agenda.

DEMOCRAT HOUSE MAJORITY PASSES GUN CONTROL BILLS HR 8 & HR 1112 BY A 240-190 VOTE~GOP & SECOND AMENDMENT ACTIVISTS HOLD PRESS CONFERENCE

DEMOCRAT HOUSE MAJORITY PASSES GUN CONTROL BILLS HR 8 & HR 1112 BY A 240-190 VOTE~

GOP & SECOND AMENDMENT ACTIVISTS HOLD 

PRESS CONFERENCE

SEE: https://www.ammoland.com/2019/02/gop-gun-activist-hold-press-conference-on-universal-background-check-bill-video/; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:

Anthony Colandro ~ “not only fighting for your rights in New Jersey but Federally as well!”

Washington, DC – -(AmmoLand.com)- A host of Republican congressional members and second amendment activists gathered outside the Capitol Building on Tuesday to express opposition to a pair of anti-gun pieces of legislation that House Democrats are poised to bring to the floor for a vote.

Several House Republican lawmakers held a press conference Tuesday on Capitol Hill to protest two Democrat bills that would restrict Americans’ Second Amendment right. House Republican Whip Steve Scalise (R-LA), House Republican Conference Chairman Liz Cheney (R-WY), House Judiciary Ranking Member Doug Collins (R-GA), and Reps. Phil Roe (R-TN), Richard Hudson (R-NC), Randy Weber (R-TX), Matt Gaetz (R-FL), Kelly Armstrong (R-ND), Greg Steube (R-FL), and activists Like Anthony Colandro from Gun For Hire in New Jersey attended and spoke against HR 8 and HR 1112 – Universal Background Checks.

“HR 8 is taking the fears and concerns of a nation over gun violence and perpetrating a fraud over them,” said Republican Georgia Rep. Doug Collins, the ranking member on the House Judiciary Committee. “[Democrats are] preying upon the very victims that they’re wanting to supposedly help by putting a bill out there that will not help them, by constantly bringing up the mass violence instances such as at schools and theaters and others — they’re saying this will help.”

“The problem with this bill, and they [Democrats] just exposed it to themselves, is the Obama administration’s Department of Justice said if you’re going to at least try universal background checks, you have to have a registry,” Collins continued.

______________________________________________________________

U.S. House Passes Extreme Gun Control Bill, 

President Trump Threatens VETO

BY NRAHQ

SEE: https://www.ammoland.com/2019/02/u-s-house-passes-extreme-gun-control-bill-president-trump-threatens-veto/; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:

Opinion

H.R. 8 Mandates “Universal” Background Checks.

U.S. House Passes Extreme Gun Control Bill, President Trump Threatens VETO

Fairfax, VA – -(Ammoland.com)- Today, the newly minted anti-gun leadership in the U.S. House of Representatives passed its first gun control measure by a 240 -190 vote, offering further proof that anti-gun politicians are more interested in scoring cheap political points than doing their jobs and passing meaningful legislation that would make Americans safer.

Chris W. Cox, the executive director of the National Rifle Association’s Institute for Legislative Action (NRA-ILA), issued the following response to the passage of H.R. 8:

“This extreme gun-control bill will make criminals out of law-abiding Americans. It will also make it harder for good people to defend themselves and their families. Criminals, on the other hand, will continue to get their firearms the way they always have – through the black market, theft, and straw purchases. Forcing more government paperwork and additional fees on good people trying to exercise a constitutional right will do nothing to make Americans safer. On behalf of our members and supporters, the National Rifle Association will continue to fight to preserve the constitutionally protected right to self-defense.”

Earlier this week, President Donald Trump issued a statement of administrative action publicly stating he would veto H.R. 8.

WhiteHouse on H.R. 8:

” The Administration opposes H.R. 8 because it would impose burdensome requirements on certain firearm transactions. H.R. 8 would require that certain transfers, loans, gifts, and sales of firearms be processed by a federally licensed importer, manufacturer, or dealer of firearms. H.R. 8 would therefore impose permanent record-keeping requirements and limitless fees on these everyday transactions.

H.R. 8 contains very narrow exemptions from these requirements, and these exemptions would not sufficiently protect the Second Amendment right of individuals to keep and bear arms. For example, unless an exemption applies, both the act of leaving a weapon in the temporary care of a neighbor while traveling and the act of later retrieving that weapon would require processing by a licensed entity under H.R. 8. Also, unless such an exemption applies, domestic violence victims would be prohibited from borrowing a firearm for self-defense without first having the transaction go through such a licensed entity. The extensive regulation required by H.R. 8 is incompatible with the Second Amendment’s guarantee of an individual right to keep arms.

By overly extending the minimum time that a licensed entity is required to wait for background check results, H.R. 1112 would unduly impose burdensome delays on individuals seeking to purchase a firearm. For this reason, the Administration opposes the legislation. H.R. 1112 would require a federally licensed firearms importer, manufacturer, or dealer that initiates a mandatory background check on an individual seeking to purchase a firearm to wait ten business days on results before processing the transaction. If the Federal Government fails to complete the background check within this window of time, the individual seeking to purchase the firearm may petition the Government for permission to proceed with the transfer.

Under H.R. 1112, the licensed entity would be required to wait an additional ten business days after such a petition is filed before it is allowed to proceed with processing the transaction. Currently, such background checks are considered invalid 30 calendar days after the date the licensed entity initiated them. As the bill is written, therefore, an individual must file their petition on the earliest day possible. If they fail to do so, H.R. 1112 would effectively prohibit some firearms purchases from being processed because the initiated background check would be considered invalid before the end of the second ten-business-day waiting period. Allowing the Federal Government to restrict firearms purchases through bureaucratic delay would undermine the Second Amendment’s guarantee that law-abiding citizens have an individual right to keep and bear arms.

If H.R. 8, or H.R. 1112, are presented to the President, his advisors would recommend he veto the bill.”

Established in 1871, the National Rifle Association is America's oldest civil rights and sportsmen's group. More than five million members strong, NRA continues to uphold the Second Amendment and advocates enforcement of existing laws against violent offenders to reduce crime. The Association remains the nation's leader in firearm education and training for law-abiding gun owners, law enforcement and the armed services. Follow the NRA on social at Facebook.com/NationalRifleAssociation and Twitter @NRA.

---

About:
Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the “lobbying” arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Visit: www.nra.org