Translate

Tuesday, July 10, 2018

PHILADELPHIA: PROFESSING CHRISTIAN FOSTER, ADOPTION AGENCY AGREES TO PLACE CHILDREN WITH HOMOSEXUALS

Professing Christian Foster, Adoption Agency Agrees to Place Children With Homosexuals to Comply With Philadelphia Law

BY HEATHER CLARK
PHILADELPHIA, Pa. — A well-known professing Christian charity has agreed to work with homosexuals seeking to foster or adopt children after its contract with the City of Philadelphia was suspended for a time due to its policies on child placement.
According to The Philadelphia Inquirer, Bethany Christian Services of Greater Delaware Valley has agreed to comply with the City’s nondiscrimination laws and has partnered with Mayor Jim Kenney’s Office of LGBT Affairs to train staff regarding “cultural competency for serving individuals and same-sex couples who are LGBTQ.”
“Our faith calls us to work with vulnerable children and families, and therefore, it is important that Christians remain in this space,” Bethany Christian Services said in a statement. “To that end, while we will remain compliant with the law, we also remain committed to our Christian beliefs and core values.”
When asked by the Christian Post if the organization will indeed place children in the homes of homosexuals, it replied, “As the statement addresses, Bethany of Greater Delaware Valley will comply with the law.” It did not explain how it would do so without violating the organization’s stated Christian values.
On a corporate level, Bethany Christian Services is led by Chris Palusky, who formerly served in a leadership capacity at World Vision, and also has been involved with Samaritan’s Purse, CARE and World Relief.
Palusky began serving as president of Bethany Christian Services in January, a position that according to a 990 form posted online, paid his predecessor over $230,000 a year. He lists Rob Bell, Rick Warren, Coldplay, The Police, Sting and U2 among his likes on social media. Under his “religious views” section, he provides a link to a message from Rob Bell. Palusky also characterizes his political views as being in the “center.”
Christian News Network reached out to Palusky about the policy change allowing the placements; a response was not received by press time.
As previously reported, following the release of an article earlier this year by The Philadelphia Inquirer, the Philadelphia Department of Human Services decided to suspend its partnerships with Bethany Christian Services and Catholic Social Services after learning that the organizations do not place children with homosexuals. The suspension and investigation meant that the groups were unable to help place children who are in government custody until the contracts were reinstated.
The outlet had shared the report of two lesbians, who said that they had approached Bethany Christian Services in October and were advised that the organization had never placed a child in a same-sex home. The representative rather offered the women referrals to others who might do so.
In reporting on the occurrence, The Philadelphia Inquirer decided to also reach out to Catholic Social Services to ask about its practices, and was informed that the entity likewise doesn’t place children with two men or two women. The organization has never been approached by anyone in a same-sex relationship, the representative noted.
Both organizations were consequently placed under investigation and further placements of any kind were halted. Philadelphia City Council also passed a resolution to look into the Department of Human Services’ policy on working with agencies that decline to place children with homosexuals.
Catholic Social Services has since sued the City of Philadelphia over the matter, and still refuses to bend, while Bethany Christian Services decided to change its policies to conform to the City’s nondiscrimination ordinance in order to resume the partnership.
“We appreciate the city’s decision to allow Bethany Christian Services of Greater Delaware Valley to continue to serve foster youth throughout the Philadelphia community,” the organization said. “We have a long-standing history of partnering with government and secular organizations to aid children in crisis, and we look forward to continuing our nearly 20 year partnership with the city.”
Proverbs 25:26 reads, “A righteous man falling down before the wicked is as a troubled fountain and a corrupt spring.”
_____________________________________________________________
SEE OUR PREVIOUS POSTS ABOUT WORLD VISION:

Sunday, July 8, 2018

CIVIL WAR: HYPE OR REALITY? DEMOCRATS WOULD PREFER TO BRING IT ON

CIVIL WAR: HYPE OR REALITY? 
DEMOCRATS WOULD PREFER TO BRING IT ON 
COMPILATION OF RECENT TERRORIST EVENTS, ATTACKS ON TRUMP SUPPORTERS

DERSHOWITZ: ANTI-TRUMP WOMAN THREATENED TO “STAB ME THROUGH THE HEART”

Law professor reveals unhinged death threat at Martha’s Vineyard party



UPDATE: MAGA HAT THIEF ARRESTED, CHARGED WITH FELONY THEFT

Man faces charges after public exhibition of Trump derangement syndrome

NEWS REPORT:

MAN PUNCHED, DRAGGED 30 FEET BY CAR FOR HAVING TRUMP FLAG IN HIS YARD

Violence against Trump supporters escalates


NANCY PELOSI: MS-13 GANG BANGERS POSSESS "SPARK OF DIVINITY"

YOU HAVE TO WONDER ABOUT HER SANITY, OR LACK THEREOF!
"JUST WHEN YOU THINK 
YOU'VE SEEN IT ALL"
FOLLOWING SUE MONK KIDD & MAX LUCADO & CATHOLIC CONTEMPLATIVE MYSTICISM?
SEE OUR PREVIOUS POST:
https://ratherexposethem.blogspot.com/2013/01/divine-spark-in-yoga-quakerism-zoe-life.html
SEE ALSO: 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divine_spark
http://www.sparkofdivine.com/
NANCY PELOSI: MS-13 GANG BANGERS POSSESS "SPARK OF DIVINITY" 
ANOTHER PAPAL PUPPET
Rep. Nancy Pelosi is defending the violent gang MS-13 after President Trump on Wednesday called them "animals." The House Democrat leader struck a theological note, saying each gang member possesses a "spark of divinity." -- "We believe, some of us who are attracted to the political arena, to government and public service, that we are all God's children, there is a spark of divinity in all people on earth," Pelosi said at a press conference Thursday. "And as we recognize our responsibilities with that spark, that divinity within us." While Trump was specifically referring to MS-13 gang members when he spoke of "animals," Pelosi broadened the characterization to all illegal immigrants. "And so when the president of the United States says, about undocumented immigrants, 'these aren't people, these are animals,' you have to wonder, does he not believe in the spark of divinity? The dignity and worth of every person?" Pelosi said. YouTube: Tucker: There's No Defending MS-13, But The Left Is http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WHZK-M... YouTube: Tucker Battles Journalist Who Objected To Trump Calling MS-13 'Animals' http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JhWdfq...

IDENTITARIANS ON TRIAL: BRITTANY PETTIBONE & MARTIN SELLNER DISCUSS 19 DAY COURT REVIEW, SANCTIONS

IDENTITARIANS ON TRIAL: BRITTANY PETTIBONE & MARTIN SELLNER DISCUSS 19 DAY COURT REVIEW, SANCTIONS

"Her ban & my trial"

FREE SPEECH DENIED, CENSORED  
ON SOCIAL MEDIA
Sorry for that lack of content on the channel. Please let me know if and what kind of material you want to see here in the future. My Newsletter: http://eepurl.com/cK-W_v +++++++++++++ My social media: -Kontakt & Podcast: http://martin-sellner.at -Twitter: https://twitter.com/Martin_Sellner -Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/martinsellner/ -FB: : https://www.facebook.com/MartinSellne... -german channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCZ8u... +++++++++++ Support my channel https://freestartr.com/profile/martin... http://martin-sellner.at/unterstuetze... Bitcoin: 36w6EyF9RLqXDntGVvjfXt11bf6NgYWpwS Martin Sellner AT573200000012701207 32000 Thank you very much!

FARAGE BLASTS UK OFFICIALS FOR BANNING HIM FROM MEETING TRUMP~PAINTS UK GOVERNMENT IN A VERY BAD LIGHT

FARAGE BLASTS UK OFFICIALS FOR BANNING HIM FROM MEETING TRUMP~PAINTS UK GOVERNMENT IN A VERY BAD LIGHT
BY DAN LYMAN
SEE: https://newswars.com/farage-blasts-uk-officials-for-banning-him-meeting-trump; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Nigel Farage blasted the UK government for reportedly demanding President Trump not meet with the Brexit architect during his state visit to Britain later this month.
News that top UK officials have forbidden the President from seeing his old friend while in Britain broke in the Daily Telegraph days ago, and Farage has confirmed that he received similar information.

“I was the only British politician who said that he was the right thing, not just for America but for the Western world,” Farage told political analyst Tucker Carlson. “Trump tweeted, ‘Wouldn’t Farage be good as the British ambassador in Washington?’ and ever since that day they’ve been paranoid about my relationship with the president.”
“Who on earth is some official in 10 Downing Street to tell the US President who he should and shouldn’t meet? I’m sorry to say, but it paints my government, ahead of this visit, in a very bad light.”
When asked if he planned to meet with Trump despite the ban, Farage made it clear that he would not cause any undue “embarrassment” for the President, but added, “If he wants to see me for a cup of coffee, I’ll go to see him.”
Farage offered a veiled critique of the May administration for allowing the bond between London and Washington D.C. to deteriorate since Trump took office, saying, “Let’s be honest about this, relations between number 10 Downing Street and the White House have not gone as they ought to have done over the last 18 months to two years.”
On Tuesday, the Telegraph cited a Whitehall source in saying, “a ban on a meeting with Mr. Farage, the former UK Independence Party leader, is a red line for 10 Downing Street in the negotiations about the visit to the UK on Friday next week.”
“The source said Number 10 has made it clear that the US President must not meet Farage' in the talks over the itinerary.”
President Trump is scheduled to arrive in London on July 13 for a three-day state visit - his first to the UK.
Protestors are expected to be out in full force and London Mayor Sadiq Khan has green-lighted a large balloon depicting the President as a baby in a diaper to fly over the city.

Dan Lyman: 

ACTIVISTS PLAN "TRUMP BABY" BALLOON FOR PRESIDENT'S U.K. VISIT, WITH LONDON MAYOR KHAN'S APPROVAL~LEFTIST STUNT LOCATION NOT YET DETERMINED


ACTIVISTS PLAN "TRUMP BABY" BALLOON FOR PRESIDENT'S U.K. VISIT, WITH LONDON MAYOR KHAN'S APPROVAL~LEFTIST STUNT LOCATION NOT YET DETERMINED 
BY DAN LYMAN
SEE: https://newswars.com/activists-plan-trump-baby-balloon-for-presidents-uk-visit; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Activists plan to float a large balloon designed to look like President Trump in a diaper over London during his state visit to the UK in July.
A crowdfund for operational expenses has met its goal, however the group has yet to secure a suitable location after hopes to launch the inflatable from Parliament Square Gardens or a barge on the River Thames were rejected by local government, according to updates on the fund page.
“Donald Trump is a big, angry baby with a fragile ego and tiny hands,” reads the project description. “He's also racist demagogue who is a danger to women, immigrants and minorities and a mortal threat to world peace and the very future of life on earth. Moral outrage is water off a duck’s back to Trump. But he really seems to hate it when people make fun of him.”
“So when Trump visits the UK on Friday the 13th of July this year, we want to make sure he knows that all of Britain is looking down on him and laughing at him. That's why a group of us have chipped in and raised enough money to have a 6-meter high blimp made by a professional inflatables company, to be flown in the skies over Parliament Square during Trump's visit.”

An appeal to London Mayor Sadiq Khan published in the Guardian, pleading for his approval to fly the blimp from Westminster begins, “On the morning Donald Trump was elected, I cried on the tube…”
Protesters and donators are hoping the 20-foot balloon will irritate or exasperate the man who has already weathered what is likely the most vicious and concentrated onslaught of international hatred in history.
Last summer, a California artist erected an inflatable chicken resembling President Trump in a Washington D.C. park near the White House to represent Trump as a “weak and ineffective leader.”
Trump fans and Internet merrymakers gleefully embraced the Trump Chicken, appropriating the left's temper tantrum for a slew of golden memes.


Dan Lyman: 

Baby Trump Blimp Approved By Sadiq Khan To Fly Across London

After Approving ‘Trump Baby’ Balloon, Muslim Mayor Gets Dose Of Own Medicine 
After okaying a 20-foot-tall “Trump Baby” balloon to be flown over Parliament Square for the U.S. President’s arrival, London’s Muslim Mayor Sadiq Khan just received the perfect dose of his own medicine. When Barack Obama was elected president, the left strangely lost their sense of humor in regards to satirizing the presidency. Eight years later, they’ve suddenly rediscovered the art of parody, relentlessly mocking President Donald Trump without end. Unfortunately, the vitriol from the left has completely clouded what little rationality they had, causing them to spiral into desperation and insanity. Of course, their unhinged rage has produced little more than pitiful and cringe-worthy protests — and it’s only making the case for Trump 2020. As one of President Donald Trump’s most vocal critics in the UK, London Mayor Sadiq Khan has not only called for his country’s greatest and most vital ally to be banned, he’s now sanctioning disrespectful and churlish demonstrations on a taxpayer-funded property. In preparation for Trump’s upcoming trip to the UK on July 12 and 13, Khan gave his approval for a 20-foot “Trump baby” balloon to fly over Parliament Square during the historical visit. Khan lazily justified his approval of raising the inflatable caricature by arguing that he “supports the right to peaceful protest,” according to The Sun. However, conservative counter-protesters are about to force Khan to practice what he preaches. After London Mayor Sadiq Khan approved a “Trump baby” balloon mocking the U.S. President to fly over Parliament Square, Londoners are raising funds to fly a “Khan baby” balloon, featuring an unflattering caricature of the Muslim mayor in a diaper. The fundraiser on crowdfunder.com has raised over $22,000 for the balloon, which is just $4,000 away from their new goal.
________________________________________________________________

The Truth About The Trump Baby Balloon

What London's Trump baby balloon really means. Yanny Bruere joins Paul Joseph Watson on the Alex Jones Show to discuss. http://www.crowdfunder.co.uk/giant-sa...


GERMANY: MIGRANT DECAPITATES BABY, GOVERNMENT TRIES TO COVER IT UP

mourtala madou cut the 1 year old s head off on a busy train platform as an  honor killing
KILLER MOURTALA MADOU
witnesses say mourtala madou beheaded the baby as an  honor killing
GERMANY: MIGRANT DECAPITATES BABY, GOVERNMENT TRIES TO COVER IT UP

Authorities raid home of man who posted video

BY PAUL JOSEPH WATSON
SEE: https://www.infowars.com/germany-migrant-decapitates-baby-government-tries-to-cover-it-up/; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Authorities in Germany tried to cover-up the brutal murder of a German woman and a 1-year-old baby girl in Hamburg by an illegal immigrant from Niger by raiding the apartment of the man who posted a video of the incident online.
On April 12, 33-year-old Mourtala Madou stabbed his German ex-girlfriend, identified as Sandra P., and their one-year-old baby daughter, Miriam, at a Hamburg subway station. The woman’s 3-year-old son was also a witness to the carnage.
A gospel singer named Daniel J. who arrived at the subway moments after the attack and filmed the bloody scene on his phone witnessed that the baby had been almost or completely decapitated.
“Oh my God. It’s unbelievable. Oh Jesus, oh Jesus, oh Jesus. They cut off the head of the baby. Oh my God. Oh Jesus,” he is heard saying in the clip.
It subsequently emerged that Madou, whose attack was motivated by losing a custody battle, had been making threats against the woman and her baby for months but police didn’t take them seriously. A judge also revoked a restraining order Sandra P. had taken out against Madou, after which he directly threatened her, “I’m going to kill our daughter, and then I kill you!”
A blogger named Heinrich Kordewiner who found the video on Daniel J.’s Facebook page uploaded the video to YouTube, which then made him a target for authorities.
“A few days later, a team of state prosecutors and officers of the cybercrime unit of the Hamburg police arrived at Kordewiner’s apartment with a search warrant, and confiscated his computer, mobile phone and other electronics, allegedly to find “evidence” of the “crime”. He was — and still is — accused of: uploading the video,” reports the Gatestone Institute.
Kordewiner and his flatmate told Gatestone about the raid, which took place at 6.45 a.m. They recounted that when they first refused to open the door, police forced it open — and even searched the flatmate’s room, although it was apparently not covered by the search warrant.
“The police officer said that he could also search for SD (secure digital) cards,” the flatmate told Gatestone. “While he fumbled through the books on my shelf, he suggested that he could turn my whole apartment upside down. He told me to relax.”
Kordewiner was accused of having “invaded the private sphere” of the murder victim, an obscure and barely used law that has been criticized for jeopardizing freedom of the press. Daniel J.’s home was also raided by authorities.
Ulf Bornemann, head of the “Hate and Incitement” department of Hamburg’s public prosecution office and also part of the team that raided Kordewiner’s apartment, defended the law for having helped tackle, “hate crime in social networks.”
The implication here is that Kordewiner was committing some kind of hate crime by posting the video of the murder scene because it showed migrants in a bad light.
The stated reason for the raid — a breach of privacy rights — is flimsy. Only the victim’s feet can be seen in the video, and even those for only a brief moment. As the daily newspaper Hamburger Abendblatt pointed out, the footage “is blurred, taken from a distance and doesn’t allow the identification of any person.”
Meanwhile, the German publication Welt online posted a video that shows close-up footage of the victim — something that did not spur state prosecutors into action. The main difference between the two videos seems to be the verbal comment on the beheading in Daniel J’s video. The alleged breach of “privacy rights,” then, would appear to be a pretext.
In summary, authorities likely used a flimsy pretext to raid both the man who filmed the footage and the individual who posted it online to send a message to other German citizens and to oversee a cover-up of what happened, specifically in relation to the child being beheaded, which authorities still refuse to confirm.
The video has now been deleted from all German websites and YouTube channels.
“If it was indeed the authorities’ plan to censor the news and keep the information of the beheading under wraps, then it backfired. Due to the reports about the raid, thousands of people have seen the video, and hundreds of thousands have heard about the botched censorship attempt. Even worse for the would-be censors, they unwittingly revealed the very detail that they wanted to keep from the public,” writes Stefan Frank.
Attempts by the anti-immigration party Alternative for Germany (AfD) to confirm whether or not the child was beheaded were rebuffed when Hamburg’s government, in breach of its constitutional duty, refused to answer, while also blacking out large sections of a report about the murders that related to the beheading.
Hamburg’s ministry of justice concluded its investigation by declaring, “the double murder is a crime of passion that must not be of any interest to the public.”
The entire story underscores the Orwellian state that Germany finds itself in whereby the country’s huge and growing problem with migrant crime is being swept under the rug and citizens who dare draw attention to it are being tracked down and persecuted.
According to new figures from the German Federal Criminal Police Office (BKA), migrant crime targeting German citizens has soared by over 23 percent in a single year.
As Reuters acknowledged earlier this year, Germany has suffered a “two-year increase in violent crime,” rising 10 percent in 2015 and 2016. 90 percent of that increase was attributed to “young male refugees”.
As we previously reported, in 2015 Germany’s top public broadcaster ZDF said that they would self-censor when reporting on migrant crime because, according to editor in chief Ina-Maria Reize-Wildemann, “We don’t want to inflame the situation and spread the bad mood. [The migrants] don’t deserve it.”
As we document in the video below (which is banned in Germany), rather than directly address the multitude of problems that importing around 2 million “refugees” has caused the country, German authorities appear more intent on brainwashing and coercing their population into accepting the new reality with passive compliance.







CAST, CREW QUIT FILM PROJECT AFTER DISCOVERING ITS PRO LIFE MESSAGE

CAST, CREW QUIT FILM PROJECT AFTER DISCOVERING ITS PRO LIFE MESSAGE
BY DAVE BOHON
SEE: https://www.thenewamerican.com/culture/faith-and-morals/item/29458-cast-crew-quit-film-project-after-discovering-its-pro-life-message; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:

A feature film about the infamous Roe v. Wade Supreme Court decision is facing intense opposition after it was revealed that it is pro-life in perspective.
Nick Loeb, a producer, director, and star of the movie, told the Hollywood Reporter that actors and crew have bailed on him, and owners of filming locations have barred filming, after they learned that the movie takes a decidedly pro-life approach to the 1973 Supreme Court ruling that gave women the “right” to kill their pre-born babies.
As just one example, Loeb recalled that a crew member, a woman working as the film’s on-set electrician, stormed up to him and demanded to speak with the director over the content of the film. “When I told her I was [the director], she told me to go f*** myself,” recalled Loeb, who had hidden the true intent of the film by using the working title 1973. “Then she threw her headset on the ground and walked off. I found out later she was our electrician.”
The film, which also stars Stacey Dash, Stephen Baldwin, Jamie Kennedy, Joey Lawrence, Jon Voight, Steve Guttenberg, and Greer Grammer (Kelsey Grammer’s daughter), includes the character of Mildred Jefferson (played by Dash), the first black woman to graduate from Harvard Medical School and an early pro-life leader. Jefferson was serving as president of National Right to Life when the High Court opened the door to nearly unlimited abortion through its Roe v. Wade decision.
The film promises to offer a far different spin on the Supreme Court ruling than the one that has served as “official history” for the past 45 years. “Roe v. Wade is the untold story of how people lied, how the media lied, and how the courts were manipulated to pass a law that has since killed over 60 Million Americans,” reads a funding appeal for the movie.
One of the executive producers of the film is Alveda King, niece of the Reverend Martin Luther King, who appears in a trailer for the film. Among the bullet points in the trailer is the well-known fact that “abortion is the #1 killer of African Americans in the United States.”
Loeb told the Hollywood Reporter that, in addition to losing crew members, individuals who have been cast in the film have bailed over the movie’s perspective. “We had to replace three local actors, including one who was to play Norma McCorvey, even after she begged for the role,” he said, referring to the real-life “Jane Roe” of Roe v. Wade.
So far, the film’s production has moved ahead under strict secrecy for security reasons and to ensure filming locations. Nonetheless, production has still been a challenge. Loeb told the Hollywood Reporter that at Louisiana State University, “we were told we were rejected [for filming] due to our content, even though it will be a PG-rated film. They refused to put it in writing, but they told us on the phone it was due to content.” And at Tulane in New Orleans, the university pulled the plug on a filming location when the school newspaper reported that the project was pro-life.
Loeb noted that the news of Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy’s impending retirement makes the upcoming movie especially relevant, since President Trump’s replacement may give the High Court enough votes to overturn Roe v. Wade. “But even without that news, it’s one of the most controversial political decisions in history,” he told the Hollywood Reporter. It divides us and makes us uncomfortable.”
Loeb added that when he delved into the background of Roe v. Wade, “I discovered conspiracy theories, fake news, made-up statistics, and a whole lot of people involved who switched their positions from pro-choice to pro-life, including Norma [McCorvey].”
According to Loeb, the project has attracted some notable anonymous investors, and his team is now negotiating a distribution deal ahead of the film’s planned January release.