Translate

Tuesday, March 27, 2018

BILLY GRAHAM GAVE "AID & COMFORT TO THE ENEMIES OF CHRIST"~A PERSONAL TESTIMONY

BILLY GRAHAM GAVE "AID & COMFORT 
TO THE ENEMIES OF CHRIST"~
A PERSONAL TESTIMONY 
My Testimony About Billy Graham
March 27, 2018
Way of Life Literature, P.O. Box 610368, Port Huron, MI 48061
866-295-4143, 
fbns@wayoflife.org

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research 

purposes:
The following testimony is by Brian Snider bksnider@gmail.com -


Billy Graham on cover of Time
I grew up in the 1960s in Southern Baptist Churches and I never heard a negative word about Billy Graham, either from my parents, my church or the world at large. He seemed to be loved and admired by everyone. We often watched his crusades on television and I grew up having great respect for him. 

The decisions I made in my teen years led me away from my Southern Baptist upbringing and into deep and gross sin. I wandered around lost until I was in my early 30s. I did so many wicked things, it shocks my mind now to even think back on what I was by the time I was 32-years-old. I was guilty before God and worthy of hell. 

But then something dramatic happened to me. In February of 1992 I was radically saved through the gospel of Jesus Christ. Even though I grew up in church and heard the Bible preached from the time I was a child, I never knew in a personal way what Jesus Christ had done for me. 

In 1992, I found out exactly what he had done for me through his atonement on the cross! 

My sins - all those deep, dark, horrendous things I had done - were laid on his back when he went to the cross 2,000 years ago. That became a reality to me when I, in deep repentance, turned to place my faith and trust in him. 

What bliss! All my sins were taken away because of the free gift of salvation. 

For the first time in my life, I got interested in the Bible and in the truth. I began to study scripture, and I began to learn about how the world really works from God’s point of view. 

One of the things I found out was that most of the religious world was corrupt. By that, I mean that many who call themselves Christian had, in fact, deviated greatly from the gospel and the spiritual things that the Lord had given us in scripture. They had fallen away from the ‘faith once given to the saints.’ 

I also learned that the God had told us just such a thing would happen. Just as the Jews had failed their God in the OT, the Bible prophesies that the Christian church would be overwhelmingly corrupt when the Lord returns. 

Speaking of the last days, Paul warned Timothy: 2 Tim. 4:1 I charge thee therefore before God, and the Lord Jesus Christ, who shall judge the quick and the dead at his appearing and his kingdom; 2 Preach the word; be instant in season, out of season; reprove, rebuke, exhort with all longsuffering and doctrine. 3 For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; 4 And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables. 
Nevertheless when the Son of man cometh, shall he find faith on the earth? Luke 18:8(b)

When the Lord Jesus comes back in the sky, he is going to take vengeance on all those who have refused him. 

And to you who are troubled rest with us, when the Lord Jesus shall be revealed from heaven with his mighty angels, 8 In flaming fire taking vengeance on them that know not God, and that obey not the gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ: 9 Who shall be punished with everlasting destruction from the presence of the Lord, and from the glory of his power; 10 When he shall come to be glorified in his saints, and to be admired in all them that believe (because our testimony among you was believed) in that day. 2 Thess. 1:7-10

One of the main ways that men deviate from the gospel of scripture is by trying to mix self-effort with the gospel of grace. The greatest example, though certainly not the only one, is the Roman Catholic Church. 

The scripture says that anyone who preaches any gospel other than a gospel of grace is condemned of God: "But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed. 9 As we said before, so say I now again, If any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed." Gal. 1:8,9

Then there are those who have made a mockery of the seriousness of scripture by turning it into a three-ring-circus of shame. Pick any televangelist you like to see what we mean by that. You can also lump pentecostalism, emerging churches and contemporary churches into this category. 

And then there are those who are called modernists. To me, these are some of the most despicable. They are the ones who claim to be Christian, but they have turned the miraculous aspects of scripture into myth and fable. They do not believe in an inerrant Bible, they do not believe in the Garden of Eden, they do not believe in the virgin birth or the resurrection, yet they go on calling themselves by the holy name of Christ, all the while teaching people to doubt God. 

My friend, you cannot be a Christian if you do not believe the Word of God. 

Believing God’s word is the ONLY way you can become a Christian. There is no other door. If you deny the word of God, you are lost. If you change the word of God, you will be reproved and found to be a liar. If you pervert the word of God, you are condemned. 

That is clear from the Old Testament and it is clear from the New Testament. Jesus said that failure to believe the writings of Moses means that you cannot believe the words of Christ. 

For had ye believed Moses, ye would have believed me: for he wrote of me. But if ye believe not his writings, how shall ye believe my words? John 6:46

Well, as a newly minted Christian, I started reading. Reading is a great gift. You learn things if you read. And because I had thrown off all my false notions about life and had come to trust the Bible as my guide, I was looking at everything in a whole new spiritual way. 

I was particularly interested in Christian history and the history of the Lord’s church. 

One of the saddest things that I read, and it was shocking to me at the time, was that the man that I grew up respecting so much as a little boy, this great evangelist Billy Graham, had actually made a career of giving aid and comfort to the enemies of Christ that I just named above. I vividly remember sharing this information with my brother, Alan, who had helped point me to Christ. 

Alan was indignant that I would criticize this man. But as he read Graham’s statements he realized that what I was saying was true. Graham had turned away from what was right. It was a hard truth, but it went right in line with the scriptural warnings about spiritual deception in the last days. 

How was it possible? How could anyone who claims to be a Christian, to love Christ, give any respect to those who pervert the word of God? 

Having just learned what Christ had done for me, and how precious He was, it seemed incredible that anyone who knows our Lord could betray Him in that way. 

But there it was in black and white. And Billy Graham didn’t do it just a little. This was not just a little compromise here and there. His entire career had been one betrayal of the Lord after another. It was done wholesale. And he had done it with eyes wide open. He started out on the side of conservative, fundamental, Bible-believing Christians and had made a conscious decision to go another direction. 

Whatever his motives might have been, his move in a more liberal direction was made against the pleadings friends and those who understood the dangers of flirting with apostasy. 

The last 70 years of his ministry have seen him drift further and further away from the position he espoused in his youth. In exchange, he has received much love and admiration from this world, for what that’s worth. 

1 John 5:19 And we know that we are of God, and the whole world lieth in wickedness.

The Christ he claimed to preach certainly did not have the respect of this world. He didn’t want it. 

Jesus Christ said of himself that he was a prophet 
without honor. He was hated by this world. No, he was loathed by this world. 

He was taken to the brow of the hill in his own hometown to be thrown off. He was threatened by the Pharisees. He was accused of being demon possessed. Ultimately, he was crucified by this world. The Jews and the Gentiles joined forces to eliminate him from this earth. "We will not have this man to reign over us.” Luke 19:13. In his willingness to die for the truth, he was actually making it possible for man to be saved and freed from darkness and death. 

Those who have followed Christ in truth have often received the same reward from this wicked, sin-saturated world: 

Hebrews 11:36 And others had trial of cruel mockings and scourgings, yea, moreover of bonds and imprisonment: 37 They were stoned, they were sawn asunder, were tempted, were slain with the sword: they wandered about in sheepskins and goatskins; being destitute, afflicted, tormented; 38 (Of whom the world was not worthy:) they wandered in deserts, and in mountains, and in dens and caves of the earth. 39 And these all, having obtained a good report through faith, received not the promise: 40 God having provided some better thing for us, that they without us should not be made perfect.

That is definitely not Mr. Graham’s testimony. He considered himself a 
Prophet with Honor. That is what he said of himself on the cover of his autobiography. I would agree that assessment. 

As much as Christ was hated by this world, Graham has been loved by this world. That ought to cause any thinking Christian to stop for a minute and ask “why?” Things that are different are not the same. 

If the world hate you, ye know that it hated me before it hated you. If ye were of the world, the world would love his own: but because ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you. Remember the word that I said unto you, The servant is not greater than his lord. If they have persecuted me, they will also persecute you; if they have kept my saying, they will keep yours also. John 15:18-20

"We are made as the filth of the world, and are the offscouring of all things unto this day,” Paul said of himself and his fellow apostles. Graham, apparently, did not desire a place with the outcasts. Instead, he had his name in lights and was welcome in Hollywood, Washington, New York and Rome. He wanted to make Christianity respectable to the world by downplaying its offense.

Now he is dead and he will be immortalized 
by the world as the greatest Christian of all time. That is not an honor anyone should seek. 

Time, Newsweek, ABC, NBC, CBS, presidents, cardinals, and religious leaders of all stripes will spend the next several days praising Billy Graham to the heavens as they have done for his entire ministry and career. 

Luke 6:26 Woe unto you, when all men shall speak well of you! for so did their fathers to the false prophets.

Why did the world so hate Christ and the apostles and so love Graham and his team? 

We do not have to look to deeply to discover a fundamental difference in approach. 

Jesus Christ’s main focus was on the truth about God and about Himself. He could in no way diminish his own honor because to do so would be to denigrate God. “He cannot deny himself.” 2 Tim. 2:13 

He is the center of human history because he was God in the flesh. He is the only hope of salvation of man. 

When a preacher offers Jesus Christ as the only hope of salvation, and when he makes it clear that the terms are very narrow, he will make himself an enemy of this world. 

For Billy Graham, the Jesus Christ he offered was not the narrow one of scripture. Graham made the way broad enough that Roman Catholic priests and modernist infidels found ample road under their feet. No matter how much anyone blasphemed Christ, Graham would praise them and give them false hope of eternity. If anything marks a false prophet, it is whether or not they will live and die for the cause of truth. 

Graham was able to find soft words not only for modernists and Roman Catholics, but even heathen idolaters. Bold, wicked, unrepentant blasphemers were treated as great friends of God by Graham. That’s the way to make sure that the world loves you. Never call the world’s hand. Never challenge the world and its wicked ideas about Jesus Christ. 

It has always been so. It was that way in Isaiah’s day and it is not different today. "That this is a rebellious people, lying children, children that will not hear the law of the Lord: Which say to the seers, See not; and to the prophets, Prophesy not unto us right things, speak unto us smooth things, prophesy deceits:" Is. 30:9,10

Graham had no great love for the narrow preachers of a narrow gospel. Graham liked the broad road and the wide way. And the people of the broad way loved having him as one of their own. 

That was true even of the king of all apostates, the wicked Pope of Rome. My people have always said that the popes are antichrist. They have said it loudly and vehemently. The foul gospel of Rome damns people to an eternal hell. That is what we believe. 

The popes have never ceased to pervert the gospel; they have burned my people at the stake and they have hounded and mercilessly treated anyone who wanted to read the Bible in their own language: they have never been anything other than enemies of the cause and gospel of Jesus Christ. 

But that has never stopped Graham from crossing over to Satan’s side to praise the Pope, even to the point of calling John Paul II “a great evangelist.” Maybe for Mary, but not for Jesus Christ. Graham visited the Vatican 12 times and had a warm relationship with Rome. 

In doing all this, Graham was drawn into the infidelity he flirted with. 

"In this paradise that God had built, called the Garden of Eden - 
you can take it symbolically, you can take it literally - it makes no difference as far as the truth and meaning is concerned,” Graham said in 1962. He was wrong about that. What you believe about scripture will determine your eternal home. 

"I do not believe that the ground of our fellowship is to be the inerrancy of Scripture,” he said. 

Again, this was in 1962, lest someone think he only said such things in his dotage. 

If the ground of our Christian fellowship is not based on the inerrancy of scripture we have no other ground to stand on. If the Bible is not true, or a mixture of truth and error, we have no hope…we are of all men most miserable. (1 Cor. 15:19)

It is blasphemy against God to belittle his word and suggest that it may be wrong. It is not wrong. It is eternal truth spoken by an eternal God who will never let anyone denigrate his word in that way. 

Rev. 22:18 For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book: And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.

We have no problem understanding that if our country is at war with another country, any person who sides with the other country in any way is an enemy of our cause. They are traitors. 

Think of Hanoi Jane Fonda in Viet Nam. 

Billy Graham has been just such a traitor, but in a war that is so much greater, and with so much more consequence that is makes the mind reel to think of it. He didn’t just side with the enemies of something as temporal as country. He sided with the enemies of Jesus Christ, the eternal God and judge of all men. 

Most Christians have no ability to process something like Billy Graham because they are stuck on false ideas about reward and punishment. They believe that the good he did will cancel out any error in his methods. They believe that he was simply ‘smart' to create a new way of doing things. 

But that is not the way things work. In fact, he had far more obligation to do right and to stick to the narrow path than the man who has no knowledge of the Bible at all. He knew the word of God, and therefore, his judgment will come in relation to that fact:

James 3:1 My brethren, be not many masters (teachers/instructors), knowing that we shall receive the greater condemnation.

Luke 12:48(b) For unto whomsoever much is given, of him shall be much required: and to whom men have committed much, of him they will ask the more.

Most people only see with the eyes in their head, but to assess something like this, you must have spiritual vision. If you look at the ministry of Billy Graham through the lens of scripture, it is detestable. 

What about the people who heard about Jesus Christ through his ministry? Or, rather, is it right to do wrong that good may come? 

The real question is this: what power might have been unleashed against the forces of evil if he had not been so pragmatic? 

A voice like Mr. Graham’s would have had tremendous impact, and the Christian church of today might be far stronger without the encouragement he gave to apostasy. 

Fifty years before Graham was born, Charles Spurgeon was waging war against the same tendency to compromise that Graham faced, but Spurgeon played the man and stood for the old book and the old faith. His powerful pen is still lifting the hearts of Christians today. 

Spurgeon was certainly no man of squeamish words when it came to the Papacy: ‘It is the bounden duty of every Christian to pray against Antichrist, and as to what Antichrist is, no sane man ought to raise a question. If it be not Popery in the Church of Rome, there is nothing in the world that can be called by that name.’ 

Would to God Graham had stood on the same ground. Instead, he has been the Neville Chamberlain of Christianity when he could have been Churchill. We will live with the harm he has done and the confusion he has sown until Jesus comes back. 

In taking the position he took, he got what many men crave more than anything - the respect of this world. He has received his reward. He played the world’s game and he will be paid in the world’s coin. To lie in honor in the Capitol rotunda is reserved for the elite of the elite. 

How different was the death of his Lord who was shamefully crucified without the gate. He was beaten and marred more than any man. Humiliated and disgraced, mocked and jeered. Paul and the ‘pestilent fellows’ who followed him were not treated much better. 

As Christians, we are to take our place ‘without the camp’ and bear the reproach of our Lord. Heb. 13:13When a Christian becomes anything other than an outsider in this world he must be something other than a Biblical Christian. 

Ultimately, that is the reason Mr. Graham remains so popular with the evangelical world. He appeals to evangelicals because they desperately want to be at home in this world..to be accepted by presidents, movie stars and the popular musicians of the day. Graham gave them all that and more. 

Many will say it is in poor taste to eulogize Mr. Graham in such harsh words, but the truth is, he agrees with me today. Now that he has stepped into eternity, he has seen the error of compromise in a way that none of us will fully comprehend until we see our own foolishness and sin in the light of eternal truth. 

You do not have to guess what eternity is like. You can read Scripture and know today. That is, if you stand on the ground of inerrancy. Once you step into the marshy quicksand of doubt, you won’t be able to know anything with certainty. 

To make common cause with an enemy of Christ - or to praise anyone else who does - should be anathema to any right-thinking Christian. From my study of the Bible, I believe that God has everlasting contempt for those who side with the enemies of his Son. 

You will say, ‘who is this fellow who is criticizing the great Billy Graham?’ I’m no one at all. I’m a wicked sinner who came to know the Lord Jesus Christ. But I believe that the simplest half-wit who believes the Bible is greater in the kingdom of God than all the big-name theologians who cast doubt on it. I have Scripture to support that. 

I also know that God doesn’t measure things the way we do. 

“For ye see your calling, brethren, how that not many wise men after the flesh, not many mighty, not many noble, are called: But God hath chosen the foolish things of the world to confound the wise; and God hath chosen the weak things of the world to confound the things which are mighty; And base things of the world, and things which are despised, hath God chosen, yea, and things which are not, to bring to nought things that are: That no flesh should glory in his presence” (1 Cor. 1:26-29).
 
The above testimony is by Brian Snider 
bksnider@gmail.com -
________________________________________________________________
SEE ALSO:

TRUMP EXPELS 60 RUSSIAN DIPLOMATS; CLOSES CONSULATE

TRUMP EXPELS 60 RUSSIAN DIPLOMATS; CLOSES CONSULATE 
The Trump administration is expelling 48 envoys and 12 other Russian diplomats as well as closing the Consulate in Seattle, joining allies in condemnation of Russia's attack on the UK. Rich Edson has more from the State Department.
The ousting comes over a nerve agent attack earlier this month in Britain. It includes 12 Russian intel officers from Russia’s mission to the UN in New York. It reflects concerns that Russian intel activities have been increasingly aggressive.

"TRANSGENDERISM" CAUSING PARENTS TO CHOOSE UNISEX BABY NAMES

"TRANSGENDERISM" CAUSING PARENTS 
TO CHOOSE UNISEX BABY NAMES
BY SELWYN DUKE
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research 
purposes:
“Choose your parents wisely,” goes the quip attributed to Bertrand Russell. This is especially good advice today given a new trend: selecting “gender-neutral” baby names for newborns out of the belief that “gender is fluid.”
Oh, the new appellations aren’t as bad as some perhaps drug-inspired inspirations, baby names such as “Rocket Zot,” “Dzyre,” “Moo,” “Audio Science” and “Bronx Mowgli.” (Pro tip: If you want to saddle a being with a bizarre name, buy a pet potbelly pig.) But they’re certainly more common, with unisex names such as Royal, Charlie, Salem, Skyler, Justice, and Oakley increasingly chosen by parents imbued with politically correct “transgender” notions, reports the AP.
The AP informs that unisex-type names are now more heavily represented in the Social Security Administration’s list of its top 1,000 names and are especially popular, quite predictably, among Millennial parents.
For example, baby-name site Nameberry.com “analyzed the 2016 Social Security Administration data into a top 50 androgynous name list focused on those with heavy [boy/girl] splits,” writes the AP. “Charlie came in at 50-50, followed by Finley at 58 percent for girls and 42 percent for boys. Skyler was in third place (54-46), Justice was fourth (52-48) and Royal was fifth (42-58).”
“Rounding out the Top 10 were Lennon (50-41), Oakley (52-48), Armani (46-54), Azariah (55-45) and Landry (53-47),” the news organ continued.
Providing a relevant anecdote, the AP also relates:
“We chose a gender-neutral name, Riley, for my daughter,” said Lori Kinkler, a psychologist in San Antonio, Texas. “We knew her sex, but gender is fluid and yet to be determined. Of all the difficulties faced by those who live beyond, or across, the binary, we didn’t want name-changing to be one of them.... I like that she feels she has options and knows she’ll be accepted by us no matter what.” Riley is 3.
To properly interpret this, note that Kinkler is viewing “sex” as the biological reality of being male or female and “gender” as being one’s perception of what he is, which is the current mainstream position of “transgender” activists (tune in tomorrow, though, for the latest theory).
Of course, “gender” is fluid insofar as it may not align with the given person’s “sex”; what’s often missed today, tragically, is that this is called “delusion.”
A more basic delusion, however, is that humans actually have gender. Used mainly in reference to word categories (i.e., masculine, feminine, and neuter) up until relatively recently, the term was widely applied to people by sexual “devolutionaries” who needed language to make delusive states of being sound merely like alternative lifestyles.
Now names reflecting this are being popularized, too. While the AP points out that unisex appellations are sometimes embraced simply because they sound “cool,” the idea when they’re chosen for ideological reasons is that kids shouldn’t be put in a “gender straitjacket.”
In the past I’ve reported on children raised in “sex neutral” ways, examples being “Pop” in Sweden(a nation with a “gender neutral” preschool), “Storm” in Canada, and Sasha in Britain. In some cases the parents won’t even divulge the sex of the child and refrain from using sex-specific pronouns when describing him for fear of provoking “gender specific” influence. As Sasha’s mother, Beck Laxton, put it, “I wanted to avoid all that stereotyping. Stereotypes seem fundamentally stupid. Why would you want to slot people into boxes?” This reflects philosophical juvenility.
Like so many confused parents, box-averse Laxton was on a quest to “let her kid just be a kid.” All right, but then why put him in the “kid” box?
As I explained in 2012, “I remember a cute story about the discovery of the doodlings of a seven-year-old medieval Russian boy named Onfim. In one picture, he drew himself as some kind of monster and included the caption, ‘I am a wild beast.’ This is a common childhood fantasy, but should we point to disturbed people such as ‘Wolfie Blackheart’ the ‘werewolf’ and conclude that perhaps we shouldn’t impose species-oriented norms on children?”
Note here that just as psychologists define “gender dysphoria” (GD) — strong and persistent feelings that you’re a member of one sex stuck in the opposite sex’s body — so do they define “species dysphoria” (SD), the sense that you’re really an animal stuck in a human body. And there’s just as much evidence that SD is an actual biological condition (as opposed to a delusion) as there is that GD is: none.
I continued:
Clearly, we put a little human in a human “box” not because of some arbitrary “social construct” but because he was born in a human body, and it’s far healthier to socialize him as a human than a ferret. In the same way that we cultivate a dog’s innate qualities by training him as a dog, it is how we cultivate a child’s human capacities and prepare him for his role as a human.
The point is this: The idea that you could raise a child and not place him in a “box” is a silly fantasy. We instill norms and ideas about status in children when we put clothes on them, tell them they’re human and American, teach them language and manners and to wash and brush their teeth, laugh at some behaviors and frown upon others, choose some forms of entertainment but avoid others, and when we do a thousand other things. And insofar as the parents don’t serve the role of instilling norms, the village will.
So we place a boy in a boy box not because of some arbitrary social construct, but because he was born in a boy’s body. And this brings us to the idea that, as Laxton believes, sex stereotyping limits a child’s “potential.” You see, there is a different theory — in fact, not that long ago it was recognized as a self-evident truth. It goes something like this: Far from being a defect, sex-specific parenting is a must. In just the same way we help a child with a proclivity for music fully exploit his potential by encouraging musical endeavors, it serves to cultivate and augment the characteristic qualities of each sex. This helps individuals to fulfill their potential, and prepares them for their unique role, as members of their sex. This is, mind you, how man has always created sound husbands and wives, fathers and mothers, those central building blocks of what is the central building block of civilization: the family.
Tragically, many today are making parenting decisions that can have far-reaching consequences based on “transgenderism”-enabling pseudo-science. Good science, as related in the fine Norwegian documentary The Gender Equality Paradox (shown below), informs that the sexes are inherently different womb to tomb.
Getting back to name shame, it may surprise you to learn that aside from “Lord” and “Savior,” some parents today are actually naming their children “God.” It’s perhaps fitting, however, in a time where people essentially think they can change their sex and that reality is whatever they will it to be.

HEIDI MUND: FEARLESS CHRISTIAN CHAMPION: ISLAM CONQUERING WEST~WITHSTANDS LIBERALS PROTESTING HER "ISLAMOPHOBIA" IN WASHINGTON STATE

THE LIBERALS PROTEST AGAINST HER
HEIDI MUND: FEARLESS CHRISTIAN CHAMPION: ISLAM CONQUERING WEST
BY ART MOORE
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research 
purposes:
BREMERTON, Wash. – On her previous trip to the Seattle area, Heidi Mund was greeted by more than 120 protesters carrying signs bearing messages such as “Love thy Neighbor” and “Choose Understanding Not Fear.”
When she came last week to the Navy town of Bremerton, Washington – a ferry-ride across the Puget Sound from Seattle – a smaller contingent of protesters turned out expressing the same concerns, viewing her as an enemy of tolerance who bears animosity and hatred toward Muslims.
What is it that provokes such a reaction to a German schoolteacher who grew up in communist East Germany as an atheist and a “sold-out socialist” before becoming a Christian?
In November 2013, Mund drove five hours to the historic Memorial Church of the Reformation in Speyer, Germany, when she heard the church – built to honor Martin Luther – had invited a Muslim imam to give the Islamic call to prayer.
Later, explaining the “curse,” she pointed out that the imam was declaring in his call to prayer that only Allah, revealed through the prophet Muhammad, is god.
From the church balcony on that November evening, she repeated the words Luther famously declared in 1521, “Here I stand, I can do no other.”
“Save the church of Martin Luther,” she shouted.
Mund, who was expelled from the church, later said in an interview with CBN, “They should have thrown the imam out of the church, because I am a believer in Jesus Christ, and he serves another god.”
She said that when a Muslim declares in a church “Allahu akbar,” or “Allah is supreme over all other gods,” as did the imam, “it is no longer a church; it’s a mosque.”
After declaring Allah is supreme, the Islamic muezzin then declares:
I bear witness that there is no god except Allah.
I bear witness that Muhammad is the messenger of Allah.
Death threats
After speaking to the Kitsap Patriots Tea Party gathering March 19 in Bremerton, Mund told WND in an interview that her dramatic public stand – which has developed into a ministry called Wake Up, focused on warning Germany of the civilizational encroachment of Islam in Europe – has had consequences.
Her husband lost his job, and they both have been the targets of death threats.
“Several Muslims have written me, they wanted to slaughter me. Others wanted to rape me,” she told WND.
One day after she organized a rally subsequent to her protest at the church, her husband was fired, she said.
She noted that the German media has cast her as a racist and a “Nazi.”
“They made out of a faithful believer a Nazi,” she said. “Even my students and my colleagues at school, they believed the news more than what they have seen over years.’
Over those years, she said, fellow teachers had “honored me; my students they loved me.”
“But then, because of this fake news, they changed their minds.”
She said new laws in her country have curbed freedom of speech in the name of combatting “hate speech.”
“We really need to check what we speak or what we write in public, or even on our mobile phones,” she said. “They check What’s App by law and also our computers by law.”
A hate-speech charge was brought against her in Germany that later was dropped.
Before her appearance in Bremerton, protesters said they weren’t familiar with anything she specifically had said that was offensive, but they believed that she “degrades” Muslims, expresses hatred toward them because of their religious beliefs and is not welcoming to Muslim immigrants.

TENNESSEE: A SOUTHERN BAPTIST PASTOR REPENTS OF FREEMASONRY

A PASTOR REPENTS OF FREEMASONRY 
SEE: http://pulpitandpen.org/2018/03/22/pastor-repents-freemasonry/republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
The following testimony was provided by a former Freemason:
My name is Richard Mann.  I am a native of Clarksville, Tennessee.  I am member of Pleasant View Baptist Church.  I am an ordained Southern Baptist Minister.  I am a former member of Queen City Masonic Lodge No. 761.  Conviction from the Holy Spirit caused me to leave Freemasonry.
 At the time my mother was pregnant with me, my parents were struggling financially because my father had been laid off from his job.  After a particular shopping trip, my parents passed by a group of Shriners collecting money for their charities (Shriners are an appendant body of Freemasonry).  My father drove down the road for about a mile before stopping and remarking to my mother that he felt led to donate to the Shriners; he turned the car around gave the Shriners the last three dollars he and my mom had.  “We might someday need help,” he told my mother.  That day came very soon.  I was born with a major heart defect which required surgery.  I spent two months in Vanderbilt hospital receiving treatment.  My daddy’s insurance paid very little of our massive medical bill.  It just so happened that the Shriners came to the hospital and asked its administrators to pick a family that needed help.  The hospital administrators picked my family and the Shriners paid our medical debt in full. 
 When I grew up, I was ordained as a pastor in a Southern Baptist Church.   
 One of my very close friends was an older gentleman and a Freemason.  He began to tell me about the lodge.  One thing led to another and I found myself at two different Masonic meetings being examined for membership in the Lodge.  I was found worthy to become a Freemason.  I am not only a pastor but a born-again Christian indwelled by the Holy Spirit.  During every one of these meetings, the Spirit was advising me not to get mixed up in Freemasonry.  Unfortunately, Masonry lured me in through my interest in history.  Before answering the call to the ministry, I wanted to be a history professor.  The history of the Masonic Lodge, or “the Craft” as they call it, intrigued me.  I loved the history of the Lodge and was impressed by all the famous people who had been members.  Seminary professors and even American Presidents had been Masons and I could be one, too.  So, I disregarded the pleading of the Spirit and joined the Masonic Lodge.
Entering my first degree, the “Entered Apprentice” degree, was a strange experience.  I found myself in a room with two Masonic brethren.  They dressed me in the way an Entered Apprentice should dress and told me what an Entered Apprentice should say for the initiation ceremony.  I memorized all the answers that I was required to know and learned what I was told to learn.  I was particularly struck by the part of the ceremony that involved the Bible.  I was brought blindfolded (or “hoodwinked” as the Masons say) before an altar.  My hand was placed the Holy Bible, the square, and the compass (in the Lodge, these three items are referred to as “the furniture of the lodge”).  When the Masons took off my blindfold, I saw my hands placed upon the Bible, the square, and the compass while my knee and leg formed a right triangle.  This part of the ceremony was meant to make me understand the significance of the great light and the three lesser lights.  The Worshipful Master then led me in my first Masonic blood/death oath.   Please bear with me as I try to recall it in writing.  It has been a while since I said it and, frankly, I have tried to forget it.  I swore that I would not knowingly give out any of the secrets, parts, or points of the “Entered Apprentice degree” under no less a penalty than having my throat cut from ear to ear, my tongue torn out by the root and buried in the ground where the tide ebbs and flows in every 24 hours.”  All this was done with the outstretched hands of the brothers pointed towards me in the dark.
The Holy Spirit was convicting me the whole time, asking me why I knelt at an altar before for a Worshipful Master when the only man worthy of worship was Jesus Christ.  I shrugged it off.  I found myself in the same place taking the second degree, “Fellow Craft.”  In that degree, one has to do more of the work of preparing for the ceremony and take another oath.  Again, I swore before the Worshipful Master to keep the secrets of the degree, this time “under no less a penalty than to have my body severed in two, my chest torn open, and my entrails placed on the highest point of the temple where the birds of the air would feed on them.”  Soon after, I completed the work for the third degree, “Master Mason.”  This degree is the big one.  Once more, I swore before the Worshipful Master to keep the secrets of the degree, in this case, “under no less a penalty than having my body severed in half, my entrails burned, and my ashes scattered to the four winds.”  I was prepared as a man named “Hiram Abiff,” who is, according to Masonic lore, the architect of Solomon’s temple.  I was symbolically killed by three ruffians, played by other Masonic brethren, for refusing to give them the secrets of Masonry.  I laid “dead” on the temple floor (all Masonic lodges are intended as replicas of Solomon’s temple) until I was symbolically raised by King Solomon, played by the Worshipful Master.  This is what it means to be “raised a Master Mason.”  I was then taught the secret word, “Mah-Ha-Bone,” and the stance of a Master Mason.
After that, boy, I could do anything in the Lodge and nothing was said or judged because I was a Master Mason.  I learned more and more about my secret craft and was told I could go higher in the lodge.  One particular branch of Masonry, is called “Royal Arch Masonry.”  The highest degree in that branch is “Knight Templar.”  I studied that branch.  I also studied the Scottish Rite branch, which is only for Masons of the highest (32nd) degree.  I will not go into the death/blood oaths of those branches but they have them.  To the neglect of my Bible studies, I became proficient in many degrees of Freemasonry as well as the history of the Craft.  Eventually, I was asked to give a lecture of the ancient history of Freemasonry.  Of course I said yes!  I was free to include in the lecture whatever I saw fit with the understanding that the content of my presentation had to be approved by the Worshipful Master before it was taught to the brethren.
For my lecture, I traced the practice of Freemasonry back to Babylon.  I noted that technically and historically, Freemasonry and the New Testament Church were not compatible.  I demonstrated this by providing scripture that contradicted the claims and practices of Freemasonry.  The Worshipful Master told me to destroy my lesson and never speak of it again; although I was of a higher degree that he (he was only a 3rd degree mason), he held the authority over me in the lodge as “Master” to give this command.  Another man ended up giving the history lecture.  As part of his lesson, he claimed that the result of God confusing the language of mankind at Babel was that some cultures now connected to God through Buddha, Muhammad, and Jesus.  In other words, he was claiming that there was one God known by different names in different languages and religions.  I took great offense at his twisting of scripture and lying to all the men listening to his lecture; I could not stand for it.  I could ignore the conviction of the Holy Spirit no longer.
God pulled me out of the lodge and gave me a hatred for the Masonic system; not the men in the Lodge but the false doctrine they proclaim. The Lord Jesus said “My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me.”  If you are a Christian and are practicing Freemasonry, please pray and study.  Your eyes will be open to the lies of Satan.  Listen to the voice of the Holy Spirit telling you to get out of the Lodge.  Contact me and I will give you scripture against the Lodge.
After ending my involvement in Masonry, I felt alone and scared.  For the first time, I felt God was not moving in my life.  I stood one Sunday morning, prayed, and renounced Masonry and all my death/blood oaths.  When I finished preaching and left the pulpit, I went out to a water fountain and busted out crying.  Yes, you can be a Christian and a mason, but you will do it without the approval of God and against the witness of the Holy Spirit.  I beg you to get out of the lodge.  Repent of all of it; it’s hard but you can do it.
I am happy to say I am no longer a Freemason!
[Edited by: Seth Dunn]
Editors Note:  If you have a Christian testimony about leaving Freemasonry, please love your brethren by warning them and by submitting your testimony to talkback@pulpitandpen.org.



Sunday, March 25, 2018

TRUMP ISSUES NEW MEMO DISQUALIFYING THOSE WITH GENDER DYSPHORIA FROM MILITARY WITH "LIMITED" EXCEPTIONS


TRUMP ISSUES NEW MEMO DISQUALIFYING THOSE WITH GENDER DYSPHORIA FROM MILITARY WITH "LIMITED" EXCEPTIONS
BY HEATHER CLARK
SEE: http://christiannews.net/2018/03/24/trump-issues-new-memo-disqualifying-those-with-gender-dysphoria-from-military-with-limited-exceptions/republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
WASHINGTON — President Trump has issued a new memorandum disqualifying transgenders from serving in the military in alignment with recommendations from Secretary of Defense Gen. James Mattis, who submitted last month that those with gender dysphoria should be considered ineligible, with “limited” exceptions.
“[T]he secretary of Defense, in consultation with the secretary of Homeland Security, submitted to me a memorandum and report concerning military service by transgender individuals,” the memo, issued on Friday, reads. “These documents set forth the policies on this issue that the secretary of Defense, in the exercise of his independent judgment, has concluded should be adopted by the Department of Defense.”
“Among other things, the policies set forth by the secretary of Defense state that transgender persons with a history or diagnosis of gender dysphoria—individuals who the policies state may require substantial medical treatment, including medications and surgery—are disqualified from military service except under certain limited
circumstances,” it outlines.
Mattis’ recommendations, now reviewed by Christian News Network, came down to a matter of troop readiness and lethality.
“Based on the work of the Panel and the Department’s best military judgment, the Department of Defense concludes that there are substantial risks associated with allowing the accession and retention of individuals with a history or diagnosis of gender dysphoria and require, or have already undertaken, a course of treatment to change their gender,” he wrote to Trump on Feb. 22.
“Furthermore, the Department also finds that exempting such persons from well-established mental health, physical health, and sex-based standards, which apply to all service members, including transgender service members without gender dysphoria, could undermine readiness, disrupt unit cohesion, and impose an unreasonable burden on the military that is not conducive to military readiness,” Mattis added.
He suggested three exceptions, one being if a person diagnosed with gender dysphoria can demonstrate a period of at least 36 months where they no longer suffer from the psychological condition. Those diagnosed with gender dysphoria who do not seek to “transition” to the opposite sex, and are deployable, may also serve. Those who have already been serving prior to the effective date of the new policy will not be discharged.
As previously reported, last July, President Trump announced his initial decision to reinstate the ban on transgenders in the military, advising that the issue is a distraction and would place a burden on the finances of the Armed Forces.
“After consultation with my generals and military experts, please be advised that the United States government will not accept or allow transgender individuals to serve in any capacity in the U.S. military,” he tweeted. “Our military must be focused on decisive and overwhelming victory and cannot be burdened with the tremendous medical costs and disruption that transgenders in the military would entail. Thank you.”
Weeks later, five service members filed suit to challenge the ban, with the assistance of the National Center for Lesbian Rights and GLBTQ Legal Advocates and Defenders.
Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly, appointed to the bench by then-President Bill Clinton, issued an injunction in favor of the complainants in October, writing in part, “On the record before the court, there is absolutely no support for the claim that the ongoing service of transgender people would have any negative effect on the military at all. In fact, there is considerable evidence that it is the discharge and banning of such individuals that would have such effects.”
It is not clear if Mattis’ recommendations and Trump’s subsequent new memo will be affected considering the injunction.
_______________________________________________________
Trump order bans most transgender people 
from military 
The White House released a memo on Friday evening stating that transgender people are now 'disqualified from military service except under limited circumstances