Translate

Saturday, November 11, 2017

ATTACK ON SENATOR RAND PAUL CALLED "SERIOUS CRIMINAL MATTER"

ATTACK ON SENATOR RAND PAUL CALLED 
"SERIOUS CRIMINAL MATTER" 
BY STEVE BYAS
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 
After last week's vicious assault upon U.S. Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky by his next-door neighbor Rene Boucher (initially dismissed in the media as a “trivial” dispute over landscaping issues, non-political, and involving only “minor injuries"), several of Rand Paul’s neighbors and Paul’s attorney have challenged those assertions.
Doug Stafford, Paul’s lawyer, told CNN on Thursday that the assault was a “serious criminal matter involving serious injury. This was not a fight. It was a blindside, violent attack by a disturbed person. Anyone claiming otherwise is either uninformed or seeking media attention.”
Boucher, an anesthesiologist and Paul's next-door neighbor of 17 years, has been charged with a misdemeanor, fourth-degree assault in the attack, which reportedly occurred while Paul was mowing his yard in Bowling Green, Kentucky. Paul was using earplugs, and was completely unaware of Boucher until he tackled him behind, breaking six of Paul's ribs.

Paul is also suffering from excess fluid around his lungs, and there are reports that his recovery may take months. With the Democrats and Republicans so closely divided in the Senate, this could have serious political implications for tax reform and other parts of the Republican agenda. Paul is rated the most conservative member of the Senate by the “Freedom Index” of The New American (which grades members of Congress on their fidelity to the Constitution); Boucher, Paul’s alleged assailant, has a well-established reputation as strongly anti-Republican and anti-conservative.
Earlier reports indicated that the two were almost friendly, even walking their dogs together, despite holding sharply different political views. However, Stafford disputed the assertion that they were on friendly terms. Although the two men are next-door neighbors, Stafford said they had not spoken to each other for years.
Several of Paul’s neighbors have now weighed in, challenging the narrative that the attack was the result of a landscaping dispute, which left the implication that Paul did not properly maintain his property. “The Pauls are and always have been great neighbors and friends. They take pride in their property and maintain it accordingly,” neighbor Travis Creed told Breitbart.
Creed added, “Rand has enjoyed working on and maintaining his lawn for as long as I have known him. He was attacked on his property for no apparent reason and suffered serious injury.”
A registered nurse who works with Boucher told the Washington Post that Boucher’s politics are “liberal,” and that he was “active” on social media expounding on those views. For example, Boucher posted on Facebook, “May Robert Mueller fry Trump’s gonads,” and “Impeach Trump, Impeach Pence, and Keep Impeaching.”
Another neighbor, Alicia Stivers, defended Paul’s character. “I have never heard Sen. Paul speak an unkind word about anyone, let alone become physically violent. Which makes it all the more shocking that a next-door neighbor of many years who has not so much as exchanged an email or spoken word with Rand in several years, would race downhill and pummel Rand from behind.”
Stivers, who has been part of the neighborhood association for four years, added that Paul was “attacked from behind with no warning.”
While a political motivation for the attack may not be proven, it would appear that the initial reports that it was all about some leaves is highly unlikely.
This attack, combined with the shooting of House Republican Whip Steve Scalise in June, raises some serious questions. Scalise was shot in Alexandria, Virginia, by James Hodgkinson, a strong supporter of Senator Bernie Sanders, while practicing for the congressional baseball game. Before opening fire, Hodgkinson asked another congressman present what political party they were all in. When told “Republican,” Hodgkinson began shooting, almost killing Scalise.
Now, a conservative Republican U.S. senator, simply mowing his lawn, has been attacked by yet another known left-winger. Can one imagine the response of the media if a Democratic Party member of Congress was targeted in a shooting by a known backer of, say, Senator Ted Cruz? If a Democratic Party senator was struck so hard that it broke six ribs, and the assailant was revealed to be a well-known conservative activist, would the media have dismissed it all as a dispute over tree leaves?
Yet, Boucher’s lawyer argued on Monday that the dispute was “trivial.”
When Paul’s attorney, Doug Stafford, mentioned that the charges against Boucher involved “state and federal authorities,” CNN’s report said that Stafford “did not clarify why federal law enforcement would be involved in the matter.” Perhaps it is because an assault on a U.S. congressman is considered a federal offense.
It is to be hoped that Senator Paul will make a quick and full recovery, and that attacks upon Republican members of Congress by violent left-wing supporters of the Democratic Party and its progressive agenda will not become common events.
______________________________________________________
SEE OUR PREVIOUS POST:
https://ratherexposethem.blogspot.com/2017/11/socialist-neighbor-assaults-senator.html 

VETERANS DAY SPECIAL MESSAGE FROM PRESIDENT TRUMP

VETERANS DAY SPECIAL MESSAGE 
FROM PRESIDENT TRUMP 
 

NAACP URGES CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE TO ASK CONGRESS TO RESCIND "RACIST" NATIONAL ANTHEM

 http://www.bethsnotesplus.com.php56-15.dfw3-2.websitetestlink.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Star-Spangled-Banner.png
NAACP URGES CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE TO ASK CONGRESS TO RESCIND "RACIST" NATIONAL ANTHEM 
BY WARREN MASS
 
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 
The California Hawaii NAACP last week began visiting state legislators’ offices in the California state capitol to distribute copies of two resolutions that the organization passed at its state conference in October. One urges Congress to rescind “one of the most racist, pro-slavery, anti-black songs in the American lexicon”: the national anthem. The other expresses support for former San Francisco 49ers quarterback Colin Kaepernick, who was the first major professional athlete to kneel when “The Star-Spangled Banner” was played before games last season. His form of protest was copied by other NFL players during this year’s NFL season and has become a highly publicized source of controversy that even attracted the attention of President Trump.
“We owe a lot of it to Kaepernick,” said California Hawaii NAACP President Alice Huffman, as quoted by the Sacramento Bee. “I think all this controversy about the knee will go away once the song is removed.”
It was Huffman who proposed the idea of the resolutions at a recent NAACP state convention. “We’re not trying to protest the flag at all,” Huffman said. “We’re protesting this racist song that has caused so much controversy in America, and we’re just trying to get it removed. So, whatever comes out in the future as a national anthem, we can all stand proudly and sing it.”

“This song is wrong; it shouldn’t have been there, we didn’t have it ’til 1931, so it won’t kill us if it goes away,” Huffman insisted, as quoted by TV station CBS 13 in Sacramento.
The CBS report noted that Colin Kaepernick started the NFL protests to bring attention to what he regarded as “systemic racial injustice in the country.” But Huffman alleges that Kaepernick’s message was lost when it turned into a debate about the flag. “The message got distorted, the real intentions got overlooked, it became something that’s dividing us, and I’m looking for something to bring us back together,” she said.
Huffman told CBS that the NFL protests led her to look at the lyrics of the “Star Spangled Banner,” especially the parts of the anthem we don’t typically sing, such as beyond the first stanza. “It’s racist; it doesn’t represent our community, it’s anti-black,” she alleged.
Interestingly, Kaepernick never cited the words that Huffman says are offensive to black Americans as a reason for kneeling during the playing of the “Star Spangled Banner.”
During a 2016 interview with NFL Media, Kaepernick made this statement explaining his reason fro refusing to stand for our national anthem:
I am not going to stand up to show pride in a flag for a country that oppresses black people and people of color. To me, this is bigger than football and it would be selfish on my part to look the other way. There are bodies in the street and people are getting paid leave and getting away with murder.
In an op-ed piece in the New York Times on September 25, Kaepernick’s former teammate, San Francisco 49ers safety Eric Reid, wrote: “Why Colin Kaepernick and I Decided to Take a Knee.” He wrote:
In early 2016, I began paying attention to reports about the incredible number of unarmed black people being killed by the police. The posts on social media deeply disturbed me, but one in particular brought me to tears: the killing of Alton Sterling in my hometown Baton Rouge, La. This could have happened to any of my family members who still live in the area. I felt furious, hurt and hopeless. I wanted to do something, but didn’t know what or how to do it. All I knew for sure is that I wanted it to be as respectful as possible.
A few weeks later, during preseason, my teammate Colin Kaepernick chose to sit on the bench during the national anthem to protest police brutality. To be honest, I didn’t notice at the time, and neither did the news media. It wasn’t until after our third preseason game on Aug. 26, 2016, that his protest gained national attention, and the backlash against him began.
Reid approached Kaepernick and the two of them discussed “how we could make a more powerful and positive impact on the social justice movement.” He continued:
After hours of careful consideration, and even a visit from Nate Boyer, a retired Green Beret and former N.F.L. player, we came to the conclusion that we should kneel, rather than sit, the next day during the anthem as a peaceful protest.
Kaepernick’s and Reid’s allegations that our nation’s police officers regularly engage in shooting unarmed black people are contrary to the facts. As just one example disputing Reid’s allegations, an article in the Washington Times on April 21, 2015 stated: “An analysis released last week shows that more white people died at the hands of law enforcement than those of any other race in the last two years, even as the Justice Department, social-justice groups and media coverage focus on black victims of police force.” Another report from the Federalist Papers Project the following day cited Peter Moskos, an assistant professor at New York City University’s John Jay College of Criminal Justice, who concluded that during the period ranging from May 2013 to April of 2015 that roughly 49 percent of those killed by law-enforcement officers were white, while only 30 percent were black.
While the numbers still seem to substantiate Kaepernick's claims of unethical targeting of blacks by police (since blacks only make up 13 percent of the U.S. populace), it must be remembered that, as Wall Street Journal editor Jason Riley, who happens to be black, noted: "Blacks commit seven to 10 times more violent crimes in this country than whites do." So if anyone were to complain about police targeting, it should be whites.
These figures do not address another significant point, however: Even if Kaepernick’s and Reid’s allegations about disproportionate police violence against black citizens had some basis in fact, does publicly showing disrespect for our national anthem do anything to solve the problem?
Returning to the statements made by Huffman, pointing to Kaepernick’s kneeling during the national anthem as evidence that the long-revered song is racist and the cause of controversy, there simply is no connection. Kaepernick never said he was objecting to the anthem and did not mention any words in the song to which he was taking issue. His protest was strictly against what he perceived to be law enforcement’s treatment of black citizens. He never objected to the anthem itself.
Yet, the NAACP proposal is not intended to disrespect the flag, Huffman said. “We’re not trying to protest the flag at all,” she said. “We’re protesting this racist song that has caused so much controversy in America, and we’re just trying to get it removed. So, whatever comes out in the future as a national anthem, we can all stand proudly and sing it.”
Even that statement belies reality. The lyrics to which Huffman objects are found in the rarely sung third stanza of the anthem. Furthermore, if we are to infer that Francis Scott Key was being derogatory to blacks, we would also have to assume that he also hated "hirelings," who are mentioned in the same stanza — not likely. In truth, the objectionable lyrics in question are impossible to interpret and are left to conjecture, unless we can bring Francis Scott Key back from the dead so he can explain their meaning to us. We offer the words below, and challenge anyone to tell us exactly what Key’s intentions were:
And where is that band who so vauntingly swore
That the havoc of war and the battle's confusion,
A home and a country, should leave us no more?
Their blood has washed out their foul footsteps' pollution.
No refuge could save the hireling and slave
From the terror of flight, or the gloom of the grave:
And the star-spangled banner in triumph doth wave,
O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave."
As an interesting aside, there were reputedly black British troops at the fort, called the Corps of Colonial Marines, who could have been the objects of the song. Deciphering the meaning of these words would make an interesting exercise in an English literature class, but no person without an agenda would say they warrant the wholesale scrapping of our national anthem.
But then again, the NAACP always has an agenda.

Related articles:
NAACP Releases Report on Tea Party Racism
NAACP Set to Release Report on Tea Party Racism
National Anthem Protests
The Star-spangled Banner

Friday, November 10, 2017

CANADA: CATHOLIC SCHOOLS THREATENED TO PUSH LGBT AGENDA

CANADA: CATHOLIC SCHOOLS THREATENED 
TO PUSH LGBT AGENDA 
 Recent developments in Canada highlight the extreme danger of allowing government to get involved in the funding of private schools. In short, taxpayer-funded Catholic schools in the Canadian province of Alberta are being threatened with closure. The reason: refusing to promote homosexuality, gender confusion, masturbation, anal sex, and other elements of the mandated “sex education” curriculum. Americans should take note.
 

VIETNAM: PRESIDENT TRUMP'S POWERFUL SPEECH TO WORLD LEADERS AT "APEC 2017": "I'M PUTTING AMERICA FIRST"~VETERANS HONORED

VIETNAM: PRESIDENT TRUMP'S POWERFUL SPEECH 
TO WORLD LEADERS AT "APEC 2017": 
"I'M PUTTING AMERICA FIRST" 
 "I am going to put America First" President Donald Trump gives a defiant speech at APEC 2017 Summit slamming U.S. trade partners for unfair trade and taking advantage of the United States. 
November 10, 2017
 President Trump Signs a Presidential Proclamation 
for the 50th Anniversary of the Vietnam War
 President Donald Trump participates in a meet and greet with Veterans of the Vietnam War, commemorating the 50th anniversary with a presidential proclamation. 
November 10, 2017

TRUMP CONDEMNS KIM JONG UN: DICTATOR HAS "COMMITTED CRIMES AGAINST GOD & MANKIND"

 Trump Condemns Kim: Dictator Has 'Committed Crimes Against God, Mankind'
 http://www.standard.net/image/2017/11/07/1200x_a16-9_b0_q80/Trump-South-Korea.jpg
TRUMP CONDEMNS KIM JONG UN: DICTATOR HAS "COMMITTED CRIMES AGAINST GOD & MANKIND"
 President slams hellish North Korean regime 
in Seoul address
BY DAN LYMAN
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 
President Donald Trump delivered a robust address to the South Korean National Assembly in Seoul, heaping praise on the nation’s accomplishments before launching into a blistering condemnation of the Kim dictatorship and its mistreatment of North Koreans.
Standing just miles from the Demilitarized Zone between the once unified countries, Trump used his looming proximity to deliver a stern, strategic warning aimed directly at young Kim Jong-un and his hereditary hermit kingdom.

“I also have come here to this peninsula to deliver a message directly to the leader of the North Korean dictatorship,” Trump announced. “Weapons you are acquiring are not making you safer. They are putting your regime in grave danger.”
“Every step you take down this dark path increases the peril you face. North Korea is not the paradise your grandfather envisioned. It is a hell that no person deserves.”

“Yet, despite every crime you have committed against God and man… we will offer a path to a much better future,” he continued. “It begins with an end to the aggression of your regime, a stop to your development of ballistic missiles, and complete, verifiable, and total de-nuclearization.”
Trump called on all other “peace-loving nations” to collaborate in applying ample pressure on the North Korean government to force them to stand down peacefully and cease their pursuit of nuclear weapons.
“The world cannot tolerate the menace of a rogue regime that threatens with nuclear devastation,” he said. “All responsible nations must join forces to isolate the brutal regime of North Korea.”
“We call on every nation, including China and Russia, to fully implement UN Security Council resolutions, downgrade diplomatic relations with the regime, and sever all ties of trade and technology.”
President Trump later tweeted a video featuring choice quotes directed at North Korea from his speech, overlaid with imagery of highlights from his time on the peninsula.
“NoKo has interpreted America’s past restraint as weakness,” he wrote. “This would be a fatal miscalculation. Do not underestimate us. AND DO NOT TRY US.”
Throughout a 35-minute speech punctuated often by applause, Trump contrasted the nations now split by the 38th Parallel.
As a metaphor, Trump referred to infamous nighttime satellite imagery that depicts a bright, thriving South Korea situated just below the extreme darkness of the North, where only about one in three citizens have access to sporadic electrical power.

President Trump has arrived in Beijing on the next leg of his Asian tour, where he is expected to apply additional pressure on President Xi Jinping regarding the North Korea issue, amid trade talks and other diplomatic matters.
The President had planned to make an unannounced visit to the Demilitarized Zone, but was forced to change plans due to inclement weather and related security concerns.
Dan Lyman: Facebook | Twitter
 
 

VIDEO: SAN DIEGO CITY COUNCIL HONORS HAMAS LINKED "CAIR" WITH SPECIAL DAY OF APPRECIATION

VIDEO: SAN DIEGO CITY COUNCIL HONORS HAMAS LINKED "CAIR" WITH SPECIAL DAY OF APPRECIATION
BY ROBERT SPENCER
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 
This is more of the idiocy that results from believing that “Islamophobia” is more of a threat than jihad terror. Find out just how corrosive and dangerous this false view is in my new book Confessions of an Islamophobe — preorder your copy here.
CAIR is an unindicted co-conspirator in a Hamas terror funding case — so named by the Justice Department. CAIR officials have repeatedly refused to denounce Hamas and Hizballah as terrorist groups. Several former CAIR officials have been convicted of various crimes related to jihad terror. CAIR’s co-founder and longtime Board chairman (Omar Ahmad), as well as its chief spokesman (Ibrahim Hooper), have made Islamic supremacist statements about how Islamic law should be imposed in the U.S. (Ahmad denies this, but the original reporter stands by her story.) CAIR chapters frequently distribute pamphlets telling Muslims not to cooperate with law enforcement. CAIR has opposed virtually every anti-terror measure that has been proposed or implemented and has been declared a terror organization by the United Arab Emirates. A CAIR operative recently called for the overthrow of the U.S. government.
Jihad Watch reader Roger sends in this video and the information below. Please contact the mayor and City Council members, and politely and courteously let them know that you think it was unwise of them to honor a Hamas-linked group that has consistently opposed counter terror efforts and smeared those who call attention to the jihad threat.

The San Diego School Board is already being sued by Charles LiMandri the Freedom of Conscience Defense Fund due to their working with the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) to implement aspects of Sharia in our public schools under the guise of an anti-bullying program.  San Diego seems to be a prototypical city for the Islamic takeover in cooperation with La Raza.
Now, the San Diego City Council proclaims November 4th to be “CAIR Day.” The proclamation was sponsored by council member, David Alvarez, and approved by unanimous consent.  No council member objected to the proclamation, so there was no formal vote. The measure passed on November 7, 2017.
David Alvarez, who would like to be Mayor of San Diego, submitted the proclamation. He represents a district that includes a nationally-known shrine to La Raza, Chicano Park.
Playlist – Islamic / Sharia Takeover in San Diego
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL46vdDKMO0NybCeutvSJbUh4jLgG6Gt6J
There are four so-called Republicans on this Council, Scott Sherman, Lorie Zapf,  Mark Kersey and Chris Cate.  Mayor Kevin Faulconer is also a “Republican.”
Mayor Kevin Faulconer
kevinfaulconer@sandiego.gov
City Council Members
barbarabry@sandiego.gov
loriezapf@sandiego.gov
christopherward@sandiego.gov
myrtlecole@sandiego.gov
markkersey@sandiego.gov
chriscate@sandiego.gov
scottsherman@sandiego.gov
davidalvarez@sandiego.gov
georgettegomez@sandiego.gov

GOVERNMENT & BIG PHARMA TO MAKE VACCINES MANDATORY

 EMERGENCY ALERT!
GOVERNMENT & BIG PHARMA TO MAKE VACCINES MANDATORY 
 The fight against medical tyranny is just beginning
BY  Rob Dew & Jake Lloyd | Infowars.com
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 Infowars reporter Rob Dew interviews Vaxxed producer Del BigTree for one 
of the most powerful vaccine discussions to date.
 Merck Scientists Expose Massive Vaccine Fraud
 

PURGATORY, INDULGENCES & WORKS ARE ALIVE & WELL IN THE CATHOLIC CHURCH

PURGATORY, INDULGENCES & WORKS ARE ALIVE & WELL IN THE CATHOLIC CHURCH
BY TODD FRIEL
 Watch and listen to full episodes of Wretched Radio & TV for FREE: https://wretched.org
 The theologically dark and physically bloody Roman Catholic Church of the 16th century.

SOCIALISM IS WONDERFUL IN VENEZUELA & EVERYWHERE?

SOCIALISM IS WONDERFUL IN VENEZUELA & EVERYWHERE?
  Republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 Branco Utopia in Venezuela