THE CHURCH MILITANT
Ephesians 5:11-"And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather expose them". This Christian News Blog maintains a one stop resource of current news and reports of its own related to church, moral, spiritual, and related political issues, plus articles, and postings from other online discernment ministries, and media which share the aims to obey the biblical commands to shed light on and refute error, heresy, apostasy, cults, and spiritual abuse.
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
LOS ANGELES, Calif. — A Christian school in
California has reportedly fired a preschool teacher after giving her the
choice of leaving the pornography industry or losing her job working at
the faith-based institution.
Nina Skye told Fox11 News this week she was informed by the school,
which has not been identified, that her lifestyle was in violation of
the conduct agreement that she signed when she began working at the
facility.
“[They said] I couldn’t work there because it goes against their
statement of faith [and] that it goes against their views of
fornication, like sex before marriage, and that’s what I’m doing,” she
explained. “They say it goes against the paper I signed saying I
wouldn’t do that.”
Skye said that officials tried to offer her help and a way out of the industry, but she declined.
“They were really trying to pull me away from staying in the
industry. They just really wanted me out. They offered help and advice,
but I don’t really want out of the industry,” she admitted.
She went further, telling reporters that she “loves sex” and that working as a porn actress is her “dream job.”
“It is easy money,” Skye said. “For my very first scene, I just did a
regular boy on girl scene and I got paid $2,500 on the spot. I never
had that much money, ever, just handed to me in my life.”
She has also performed in lesbian scenes as well.
On June 13, Skye posted to her social media page that her employment
had been terminated, and seemed to disagree with the decision, writing
“smh,” short for “shaking my head.”
“Got fired from a religious school just because I do porn. smh,” Skye tweeted.
She also wrote on Sunday, “Happy Father’s day to all the daddies I use to flirt with when I was a teacher and then some.”
1 Thessalonians 4:1-5 and 7-8 reads, “Furthermore then we beseech
you, brethren, and exhort you by the Lord Jesus, that as ye have
received of us how ye ought to walk and to please God, so ye would
abound more and more. For ye know what commandments we gave you by the
Lord Jesus. For this is the will of God, even your sanctification, that
ye should abstain from fornication—that every one of you should know how
to possess his vessel in sanctification and honor, not in the lust of
concupiscence, even as the Gentiles which know not God.”
“For God hath not called us unto uncleanness, but unto holiness. He
therefore that despiseth, despiseth not man, but God, who hath also
given unto us His Holy Spirit.”
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
They were supposed to be coming to supply a labor force that would make
up for Germany’s declining birthrate. Instead, they’re going on welfare,
which shouldn’t come as a surprise to anyone, since the Qur’an says
that non-Muslims must pay for the Muslims’ upkeep (9:29). Germany has
imported a huge drain on its welfare system. What could possibly go
wrong?
“Refugee reality: Germany admits 75% face long-term unemployment and life on benefits,” by Simon Osborne, Express, June 23, 2017:
THREE quarters of Germany’s refugees will be long-term unemployed and claiming benefits for years, it was admitted today.
Aydan Özoğuz, commissioner for immigration, refugees and integration,
told the Financial Times that only a quarter to a third of the
newcomers would enter the labour market over the next five years, and
“for many others we will need up to 10”.
The Institute for Employment Research (IAB) found only 45 per cent of
Syrian refugees in Germany have a school-leaving certificate and 23 per
cent a college degree.
Statistics from the Federal Labour Agency show the employment rate among refugees stands at just 17 per cent.
It said 484,000 of the refugees are looking for work, up from 322,000 last July — an increase of 50 per cent.
Of those, 178,500 are officially unemployed, meaning they not only
have no work but are not enrolled in any training programmes or language
courses — up 27 per cent on last July….
It was hoped the arrival of so many working-age, highly-motivated
immigrants would help end Germany’s skills shortage and solve a
demographic crisis posed by its dangerously low birth rate….
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
“Take a child who wants to invent something out of thin air, and
instead of saying no, tell him he has a problem with his brain, and then
stand back and watch what happens. In particular, watch what happens
when you give him a toxic drug to fix his brain. You have to be a
certain kind of person to do that to a child. You have to be, for
various reasons, crazy and a career criminal.” (The Underground, Jon
Rappoport) First, here are a few facts that should give you pause:
According
to NAMI (National Alliance on Mental Illness), “More than 25 percent of
college students have been diagnosed or treated by a professional for a
mental health condition within the past year.”
NAMI: “One in four young adults between the ages of 18 and 24 have [we claim] a diagnosable mental illness.”
According
to healthline.com, 6.4 million American children between the ages of 4
and 17 have been diagnosed with ADHD. The average age for the child’s
diagnosis is 7.
BMJ 2016;352:i1457: “The number of UK children and
adolescents treated with antidepressants rose by over 50% from 2005 to
2012, a study of five Western countries published in European
Neuropsychopharmacology has found.”
Getting the picture?
Children are being diagnosed and dosed with toxic drugs at a staggering rate.
But,
as I have shown in many past articles, NO so-called mental disorder is
based on a lab test. No blood, saliva, genetic, brain test. ALL 300 or
so official mental disorders are defined by menus of behaviors concocted
by committees of psychiatrists.
On that foundation, the diagnoses and the drugs are handed out.
Let’s
look at just one of the drugs: Ritalin (or any similar ADHD medicine).
After a creative child is seen fidgeting in class, looking bored,
studying what he wants to study, ignoring classroom assignments,
focusing on what interests him, he is diagnosed with ADHD. Then comes
the drug.
In 1986, The International Journal of the Addictions
published an important literature review by Richard Scarnati. It was
called “An Outline of Hazardous Side Effects of Ritalin
(Methylphenidate)” [v.21(7), pp. 837-841].
Scarnati listed a large
number of adverse effects of Ritalin and cited published journal
articles which reported each of these symptoms.
For every one of
the following (selected and quoted verbatim) Ritalin effects, there is
at least one confirming source in the medical literature:
* Paranoid delusions
* Paranoid psychosis
* Hypomanic and manic symptoms, amphetamine-like psychosis
* Activation of psychotic symptoms
* Toxic psychosis
* Visual hallucinations
* Auditory hallucinations
* Can surpass LSD in producing bizarre experiences
* Effects pathological thought processes
* Extreme withdrawal
* Terrified affect
* Started screaming
* Aggressiveness
* Insomnia
* Since Ritalin is considered an amphetamine-type drug, expect amphetamine-like effects
* Psychic dependence
* High-abuse potential DEA Schedule II Drug
* Decreased REM sleep
* When used with antidepressants one may see dangerous reactions including hypertension, seizures and hypothermia
* Convulsions
* Brain damage may be seen with amphetamine abuse.
Under this
chemical assault on the brain, what are the chances that a creative
child will go on in life to become an innovator, rather than a victim of
psychiatric drugging?
Make a list of your favorite innovators.
Imagine them as bored distracted children sitting in classrooms…and then
diagnosed, and then hammered with drugs prescribed by a doctor.
This is happening now.
The institution of psychiatry is making it happen.
What
about the consequences of diagnosing clinical depression in larger
numbers of young children? What about the antidepressant drugs?
Here is just a sprinkling of information about antidepressants, from a huge body of literature:
Psychiatrist
Peter Breggin: February 1990 American Journal of Psychiatry (Teicher et
al, v.147:207-210) reports on “six depressed patients, previously free
of recent suicidal ideation, who developed `intense, violent suicidal
preoccupations after 2-7 weeks of fluoxetine [Prozac] treatment.’ The
suicidal preoccupations lasted from three days to three months after
termination of the treatment. The report estimates that 3.5 percent of
Prozac users were at risk. While denying the validity of the study,
Dista Products, a division of Eli Lilly, put out a brochure for doctors
dated August 31, 1990, stating that it was adding `suicidal ideation’ to
the adverse events section of its Prozac product information.”
An
earlier study, from the September 1989 Journal of Clinical Psychiatry,
by Joseph Lipiniski, Jr., indicates that in five examined cases people
on Prozac developed what is called akathesia. Symptoms include intense
anxiety, inability to sleep, the “jerking of extremities,” and
“bicycling in bed or just turning around and around.” Dr. Peter Breggin
comments that akathesia “may also contribute to the drug’s tendency to
cause self-destructive or violent tendencies … Akathesia can become the
equivalent of biochemical torture and could possibly tip someone over
the edge into self-destructive or violent behavior … The June 1990
Health Newsletter, produced by the Public Citizen Research Group,
reports, ‘Akathesia, or symptoms of restlessness, constant pacing, and
purposeless movements of the feet and legs, may occur in 10-25 percent
of patients on Prozac.’”
The well-known publication, California
Lawyer, in a December 1998 article called “Protecting Prozac,” details
some of the suspect maneuvers of Eli Lilly in its handling of suits
against Prozac. California Lawyer also mentions other highly qualified
critics of the drug: “David Healy, MD, an internationally renowned
psychopharmacologist, has stated in sworn deposition that `contrary to
Lilly’s view, there is a plausible cause-and-effect relationship between
Prozac’ and suicidal-homicidal events. An epidemiological study
published in 1995 by the British Medical Journal also links Prozac to
increased suicide risk.”
When pressed, proponents of these SSRI
antidepressant drugs (Prozac, Zoloft, Paxil, etc.) sometimes say, “Well,
the benefits for the general population far outweigh the risk.” But the
issue of benefits will not go away on that basis. A shocking
review-study published in The Journal of Nervous and Mental Diseases
(1996, v.184, no.2), written by Rhoda L. Fisher and Seymour Fisher,
called “Antidepressants for Children,” concludes: “Despite unanimous
literature of double-blind studies indicating that antidepressants are
no more effective than placebos in treating depression in children and
adolescents, such medications continue to be in wide use.”
In wide use. This despite such contrary information and the negative, dangerous effects of these drugs.
There
are other studies: “Emergence of self-destructive phenomena in children
and adolescents during fluoxetine treatment,” published in the Journal
of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (1991,
vol.30), written by RA King, RA Riddle, et al. It reports
self-destructive phenomena in 14% (6/42) of children and adolescents
(10-17 years old) who had treatment with fluoxetine (Prozac) for
obsessive-compulsive disorder.
July, 1991. Journal of Child and
Adolescent Psychiatry. Hisako Koizumi, MD, describes a thirteen-year-old
boy who was on Prozac: “full of energy,” “hyperactive,” “clown-like.”
All this devolved into sudden violent actions which were “totally unlike
him.”
September, 1991. The Journal of the American Academy of
Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. Author Laurence Jerome reports the case
of a ten-year old who moves with his family to a new location. Becoming
depressed, the boy is put on Prozac by a doctor. The boy is then
“hyperactive, agitated … irritable.” He makes a “somewhat grandiose
assessment of his own abilities.” Then he calls a stranger on the phone
and says he is going to kill him. The Prozac is stopped, and the
symptoms disappear.
For money, for profit, for status, for
control, there exists a professional class called psychiatrists. They
approach children—particularly creative children who refuse to fall into
lock-step with a regimented program of learning—as outliers, as ill, as
strange, as maladjusted, as threats to the system. And this
professional class takes action. Diagnose the children, drug them, bring
them back into line, make them “normal,” reduce their curiosity and
independence and drive and will power.
Instead of using overt physical force, they use relatively invisible chemical force.
Under
the banner of caring, they perform, on the young, a scientific ritual
of sacrifice, a rite of passage into the dead world where they, the
elite rulers, exist. This article first appeared at NoMoreFakeNews.com.
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
by: WSOCTV.com
Updated: Jun 23, 2017 – 8:11 AM via WSOCTV.com CHARLOTTE, N.C. – A televangelist and so-called “prosperity preacher” with ties to Charlotte has been indicted by a federal grand jury.
Pastor Todd Coontz is accused of failing to pay taxes and filing
false tax returns, as well as hiding assets that were paid for by
donations. The U.S. attorney said, “This is a classic example of, ‘Do as
I say, not as I do.’”
WSOCTV reporter Jim Bradley began investigating Coontz nearly five years ago.
As a cable TV evangelist, Coontz promised financial miracles for people who sent money to his ministry.
“You need to plant the $273 recovery seed. I’m only going to give you
two to three minutes to respond,” Coontz once told his viewers.
Coontz posted videos on Twitter as recently as Wednesday, promising financial blessings to the faithful.
“Suddenly miracles are happening. I want to work with your faith for quick things, swift things,” Coontz said in the video.
In February 2013, a WSOC investigation revealed some of Coontz’s own
“blessings,” which included a $1.38 million condo at a building on the
corner of Providence and Sharon Amity roads. In the garage of that
building was his Ferrari and his Maserati.
A federal criminal indictment on Thursday pointed to those exact same assets in WSOC’s investigation.
The condo was purchased by Coontz’s Rockwealth Ministries as
“parsonage” for him, according to the indictment. The court documents
said the cars were also titled in the name of the ministry.
The U.S. Secret Service started looking into Coontz and Rockwealth Ministries as a result of the WSOC investigation.
The indictment revealed delinquent tax returns from as far back as
2000. From 2010-2013, Coontz owed more than $326,000 in taxes.
Investigators said he also hid his income from the Internal Revenue
Service by cashing checks he received from churches and ministries for
travel and speaking engagements and then claiming that same travel as
business expenses.
The indictment also revealed he used business funds to pay for
personal expenses, such as more than $227,000 for clothes, $140,000 at
restaurants and more than 400 charges at movie theaters.
Coontz’s defense attorney, Mark Foster, said the indictment makes allegations but isn’t proof.
“He’s otherwise is a good man,” Foster said. “He’s tried to do the
right thing all his life and he has no criminal record. We’re going to
fight this out.”
Foster said Coontz trusted others to manage his finances and taxes
for him and was shocked to find out he was under criminal investigation
by the IRS.
Coontz has been ordered to appear in federal court in Charlotte. Statement from Coontz’s attorney:
“William Todd Coontz has been indicted by a federal grand jury in
Charlotte on several criminal tax charges. Coontz unequivocally asserts
his innocence of these charges.
A grand jury is tasked only with determining whether there is
probable cause to believe that a defendant has committed a federal
crime. The government presents its evidence to the grand jury in secret
and the defense cannot be present. Thus, the grand jury’s indictment of
Coontz is not a determination of guilt — it is merely a preliminary
finding that is necessary before the federal government can prosecute
someone.
The government has chosen to make a statement to the press about
Mr. Coontz’s indictment. It must be remembered that Todd Coontz is
presumed innocent. Todd Coontz has retained veteran federal criminal
defense attorney Mark Foster to represent him in this case and will
vigorously defend himself against these charges. Todd Coontz has always
endeavored to follow the law and to be a good citizen, father and
minister. He trusted others to manage his finances and taxes for him and
was shocked to find out he was under criminal investigation by the IRS. ______________________________________________________
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
An alliance of Central European countries led by Hungary
has pledged to work together to stem the flow of illegal migrants into
Europe.
It is refreshing to see countries in Central Europe finally stand up
and defend their borders, and reject the suicidal immigration policies
that have led other European countries into massive crime, debt and
escalating jihad attacks.
Delegations to the Central European Defence Cooperation have declared
themselves “united against mass illegal migration”; which is tantamount
to saying that they are “united against the hijrah.”
An additional difficulty with unvetted migrants swarming Western
borders has been contagious illnesses. A Yemini asylum seeker with
tuberculosis who visited a kindergarten class in Germany several times is said to have possibly infected up to “18 children and four adults with the disease.”
“Hungarians Declare: ‘Central Europe Stands United Against Mass Illegal Migration’”, Jack Montgomery, Breitbart, June 21, 2017:
An alliance of Central European countries led by Hungary
has pledged to work together to stem the flow of illegal migrants into
Europe at a meeting in Prague.
Delegations to the Central European Defence Cooperation (CEDC) group
from Austria, Croatia, Hungary, Slovakia, Slovenia, and the Czech
Republic were, according to a report on the Hungarian government’s
official website, “united against mass illegal migration”.
Defence ministers at the summit agreed to “facilitate the quick and
joint mobilization of civilian, police and military capabilities” in
defence of the European Union’s external borders.
Elaborating on the reasons behind Hungary’s robust anti-mass
immigration stance, Prime Minister Viktor Orbán explained: “What we want
is a Hungarian Hungary and a European Europe.”
The Fidesz leader said his government “won’t participate in
experiments aimed at changing Hungary or Europe, in which Europe’s
cultural traditions would be swept aside to be replaced by a mixture of
other cultures, religions and worldviews, allowing masses to enter
without control”…..
Islamic
Prayer opens April 5th State Legislative session in Delaware. Blatant
Civilization Jihad cues being put forth in both the spoken and unspoken
language, and no one noticed...or cared.
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
At a Delaware Senate meeting, Air Force veteran Sen. Dave Lawson (R-Marydel) was shocked
to hear two Muslims take the floor to recite an Islamic prayer to
Allah. From the same book that calls for the death of nearly everyone in
the room – nonetheless, almost all of the non-Muslim Senate members
bowed their heads in worship to the Muslim god. Lawson knew what he had to do. He stepped up to the plate and laid
the smack down, while the others could only wish they had the minerals
to tell it like it is: Scroll down for video Hat tip Delaware Online
“We just heard from the Quran, which calls for our very demise,”
Lawson said after the pair of Muslims gave the invocation, including a
passage from their holy text. “I fought for this country, not to be
damned by someone that comes in here and prays to their God for our
demise. I think that’s despicable.”
To back up Lawson, there are indeed passages from the Quran that
advocate violence against non-Muslims including executions. That there
are some Muslims who take those passages literally and put them into
practice can be seen on the evening news.
Tarek Ewis, imam of the Masjid Isa Ibn-e-Maryam mosque in Newark, and
Naveed Baqir, executive director of the Delaware Council on Global and
Muslim Affairs, were invited to give the Senate invocation.
Lawson and Sen. Colin Bonini, R-Dover South, stepped out of
the chamber for the prayer. They re-entered when the speakers had
finished, and Lawson gave a brief speech, saying he “took great
exception” to the reading from the Quran.
After Lawson’s comments, the Senate proceeded as normal,
debating and passing several bills. But before the chamber adjourned
later in the evening, President Pro Tempore David McBride, D-New Castle,
halted, saying he felt “there is complicity in remaining silent.”
“I have never been of the mind to censure the words of other
members, but I also believe deeply that words have consequences,”
McBride said, reading aloud from a statement.
“Their belief flies in the face of our Constitution,” Lawson
said afterward. “This is not our Bible, we should not be allowing them
to pray from that book in our house, just as I do not believe I would be
allowed to pray from my Bible in their house.”
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
For your hands are defiled with blood, and your fingers with
iniquity; your lips have spoken lies, your tongue hath muttered
perverseness. None calleth for justice, nor
any pleadeth for truth: they trust in vanity, and speak lies; they
conceive mischief, and bring forth iniquity. —Isaiah 59:3-4 KJV Comey, Rosenstein and Mueller
While everyone is looking at Robert Mueller as the culprit in this
witch hunt of our President, we had better take a closer look at
Rosenstein, the Deputy AG who appointed Mueller as special counsel for
the DOJ and establishment infiltration. Comey, Rosenstein and Mueller
are long time affiliates. Never Trumpers Infiltrate Administration
Roger Stone feels that the Never Trumpers have infiltrated the
administration via Reince Priebus, but I believe VP Pence is also
responsible. How else does one explain CFR member, Dina Habib Powell,
best friend of Valerie Jarrett, Huma Abedin, and CFR member Condoleezza
Rice? Powell is Arabic and a former Goldman Sachs employee. She is the
current U.S. Deputy National Security Advisor for Strategy to President Donald Trump under McMaster. She is also an Assistant to the President and Senior Counselor for Economic Initiatives.
Powell is being promoted by Jared and Ivanka to be our President’s
next Chief of Staff, yet throughout her career Powell has opposed
everything Trump stands for. As Stone says, this would be jumping from
the frying pan into the fire, when there are already way too many
quislings in the administration whose allegiance belongs, not to Donald
Trump, but to the RNC, and that appears to be true for Rod Rosenstein.
Rod Rosenstein, Deputy AG
Harvard graduate Rosenstein was nominated by President Donald Trump to
serve as Deputy Attorney General for the United States DOJ on January
13, 2017. Rosenstein was confirmed on April 25, 2017. This certainly
does not mean he’s a conservative, or an anti-globalist.
I would love to know who suggests these people, and then who vets
them for our President…perhaps Pence and Priebus? There are only a few
in this administration who are truly conservative, and one of them is
already gone, General Michael Flynn, and several others never even made
it to confirmation.
Rosenstein is being hailed as a brilliant choice who is admired and
respected and completely free of controversy. Excuse me, but wasn’t
Comey hailed with the same exact rhetoric before he angered the left,
and disappointed the right?
Leftist Slate Magazine stated that Rosenstein would be a good check
against Jeff Sessions, and the Washington Com-Post even called
Rosenstein a fabulous choice for the position and completely free of
controversy! Bah Humbug! Obviously, he’s an establishment insider if
these leftist rags love him. Rosenstein and Mueller
Rosenstein joined the U.S. Department of Justice through
the Attorney General’s Honors Program. From 1990 to 1993, he prosecuted
public corruption cases as a trial attorney with the Public Integrity
Section of the Criminal Division, then led by Assistant Attorney
General Robert Mueller. They’ve been joined at the hip for a long, long time.
Mueller and Rosenstein are both part of the “Deep State.” In fact,
as Stone reports, both of them have ties to the Bush machine. Remember
the Clinton theft of FBI documents? Craig Livingstone, director of the
White House Office of Personnel Security, improperly requested, and
received from the FBI, background reports concerning several hundred
individuals without asking permission.
Mueller served as clean up man for Bill and Hillary Clinton. As
independent counsel from 1995 to 1997, he found no criminal prosecution
against White House officials who had rummaged through FBI records to
get background reports in the use of political blackmail.
In 2001, top Justice Department official Lee J. Radek, roundly
criticized for steering the China gate probe away from the White House,
had a friend in Robert S. Mueller, President Bush’s pick to replace FBI
Director Louis Freeh. Radek ran the campaign finance task force that
was charged with looking into rampant 1996 Clinton-Gore fund-raising
abuses that included Chinese money-laundering and possible
influence-peddling. Many branded Radek a “bureaucrat” who was more
interested in throttling the case against the Clinton White House, and
thereby keeping his job, than pushing it. Mueller even received a
glowing endorsement from China cheerleaders like Sens. Dianne Feinstein
and Hillary Clinton. [Link]
In the 1990s, Rosenstein was on a team of prosecutors appointed by
Kenneth Starr to investigate Bill and Hillary Clinton’s “Whitewater”
business dealings in Arkansas. In 2012, Attorney General Eric Holder
tapped him to investigate national security leaks to news outlets, a
response to heavy criticism of the Obama administration by congressional
Republicans. Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr exonerated
both President Clinton and the First Lady with respect to the FBI files
matter in 1998. And Ken Starr is telling the President not to fire
Mueller. Clintons and Comey
In the mid-1990s, Comey joined the Senate Whitewater
Committee as a deputy special counsel. There he dug into allegations
that the Clintons took part in a fraud connected to an Arkansas real
estate venture gone bust. No charges were ever brought against either
Clinton, but the scandal would eventually lead to independent counsel
Kenneth Starr’s probe that would result in the Lewinsky scandal.
How about the Sandy Berger affair? Former National Security Adviser
Sandy Berger, who was sentenced in 2005 to two-years’ probation and
fined $50,000 as the result of a plea bargain, for stealing highly
classified documents from the National Archives and intentionally
destroying some of them. He had also been functioning as a Hillary
Clinton campaign adviser before his death last December.
James Comey, was the deputy attorney general in the Justice
Department, and apparently limited the scope of the criminal
investigation of Sandy Berger. The documents Berger stole basically
proved Bill Clinton could have gone after and killed Osama bin laden,
but didn’t, proving he was negligent in the build-up to the 9/11
terrorist attack.
As I mentioned in my previous article,
Comey also gave Bill Clinton a pass with his pardon of Marc Rich and
others. Then came his pass on Hillary and her email debacle, where she
set up a private email server for herself, her family and Abedin which
was not accessible by the federal government or congress, and on which
classified documents were passed.
Hillary Clinton violated the Espionage Act of 1913 by
allowing national defense information to be “lost, stolen, abstracted,
or destroyed” through “gross negligence.” And get this, Comey had
Hillary Clinton’s definitive backup email device during the entire
charade of an investigation into the former Secretary of State,
according to court records obtained by Judicial Watch. Godfather of Comey’s Daughter is Pence Lawyer
Here is a timeline of Comey’s career,
note that he worked for McGuire Woods law firm from 1993-1996. VP
Pence’s office confirmed that he retained Richard Cullen, chairman of
McGuire Woods LLP, to assist him in responding to inquiries by special
counsel Robert Mueller. Cullen and Comey used to work together at
McGuire Woods, and Richard Cullen is the Godfather to one of Comey’s daughters. Too close for comfort if you ask me. Comey / Mueller Buddy-Buddy Connections
The fact that Robert Mueller, the former FBI head who “bungled” the
post-9/11 anthrax attack, is leading the “Russia-gate” investigation
should be a matter of grave concern for Americans. Mueller’s
appointment to investigate our President for sacking Comey is a conflict
of interest, especially since they have worked closely together in the
past.
“Former Director Mueller is exactly the right kind of individual for
this job. I now have significantly greater confidence that the
investigation will follow the facts wherever they lead.” Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA)
stated. Schumer, Dick Durbin and other Democrats echoed these comments,
along with neo-cons John McCain and Paul Ryan, which should worry
constitutional conservatives. Plamegate
Remember in 2003, Valerie Plame’s
name being inadvertently leaked by Richard Armitage who confessed to
his boss, Colin Powell? This was a scheme against Vice President Cheney
that ended in the conviction of his aide, Scooter Libby, for a weakly
proven process crime. Tag team Comey was the special prosecutor and
Mueller was FBI Director. They may well have honed their Deep State
purge of political opponents then, something clearly at the bottom of
this investigation into fictional “Russian collusion” and now
“Obstruction of Justice” with the Trump campaign. [Link] Amerithrax
Comey is a very close friend of Mueller, and covered for the
erstwhile director in the Amerithrax affair and the upcoming inquiry
could very well be a quid pro quo transaction.
Mueller thought he had his man in the bungled Anthrax investigation
because two drug sniffing doggies liked scientist Steven Hatfill when
he petted them. Mueller used this flimsy proof on this conservative
government scientist, when in fact, the FBI ignored a 2002 tip from a
scientific colleague of the alleged anthrax killer, who turned out to be
a Fort Detrick scientist named Bruce Edwards Ivins. There was no firm
proof he was responsible either, and he ended up committing suicide.
Comey seconded Mueller’s opinion, and they were both wrong.
Also check out Comey and Mueller’s showdown at John Ashcroft’s hospital bed. Link
And don’t forget Mueller’s purposely botched probe and coverup of the BCCI scandal. Mueller and Islam
Robert Mueller purged FBI training documents after 9/11. As reported by Rick Wells,
FBI Assistant Director James Kallstrom spoke to Maria Bartiromo. The
topic of the interview shifted to the issue of the real collusion, that
of the Muslim Brotherhood and CAIR
taking a prominent role and infiltrating the FBI. He described how the
White House, under both George W. Bush and the Obama regime and the FBI,
including specifically Robert Mueller, changed to accommodate the
demands of the terrorist front organization after the Twin Towers came
down. Mueller acquiesced with Muslim Brotherhood front group, CAIR.
He also met with Nihad Awad, executive director of Hamas doing business as CAIR, as well as senior leadership of the Islamic Institute, the American Muslim Council and the Muslim Public Affairs Council (all Muslim Brotherhood affiliates) in 2002 at FBI headquarters.
In 2005, under Mueller’s administration, the FBI presented an award to Mohamed Magid, the imam of the infamous ADAMS center – a hardline Wahhabis mosque – and the president of ISNA.
There have been several other instances of Mueller’s Muslim Brotherhood collusion and investigative “incompetence.”
In 2013, Mueller testified that he was unaware that the mosque
attended by the Tsarnaev brothers, the perpetrators of the Boston
Marathon bombing that resulted in three deaths and close to 300
injuries, was founded by Al Qaeda financier Abdurahman Alamoudi. Incredibly, Mueller’s department had been conducting “outreach” activities with the facility’s imam at the time. Gohmert Exposed Mueller as Terrorist Facilitator
Rep. Louis Gohmert, (R-TX) knows what Robert Mueller is, and does not
share the fawning reverence for him as the DC swamp creatures do.
Mueller, has a long record of being an official cover man for jihadists
choosing to operate in the United States. Remember the fact that Mueller
purged all of the FBI training materials and other records which
indicated reference to Islamic terrorism in the months following the
9/11 attacks, but then he also ignored warnings about the Tsarnaev
brothers and never even attempted to investigate their mosque.
Judicial Watch exclusively obtained droves of records back in 2013
documenting how, under Mueller’s leadership, the FBI purged all
anti-terrorism training material deemed “offensive” to Muslims after
secret meetings between Islamic organizations and the FBI chief.
Judicial Watch had to sue to get the records and published an in-depth report on the scandal in 2013 and a lengthier, updated follow-up in 2015. Read the full report.
When Gohmert questioned Mueller two months after the Boston bombing,
he forced admissions from him of his failures or complicity in creating
the situation in which the terrorist attacks occurred. Here’s the full story.
Watch the video:
Many Uncomfortable with Mueller
Why should we be uncomfortable with Mueller? 1) The leftist
establishment is comfortable with him. 2) He worked in tandem with Comey
on a couple of high profile cases. 3) He was chosen as FBI head by
George W. Bush (hater of Trump and owner of the words “That was some
weird shit,” in describing Trump’s Inauguration speech. 4) Obama felt so
comfortable with Mueller that upon taking office he extended Mueller’s
ten-year tenure an additional two years.
Not exactly a resume I feel comfortable in handing our president’s fate over to. Conclusion
One way to counter the Mueller probe is to discredit Mueller, using
the facts about his terrible treatment of a series of American
scientists in the anthrax case. In the end, the FBI paid off one
scientist, to the tune of millions of dollars in damages, and drove
another to his death. Meanwhile, the al-Qaeda operatives who carried out
the attacks got away. That Mueller could survive this debacle with a
sterling reputation is evidence of the corruption in the Washington,
D.C. swamp.
Next up, Mueller hires 13 lawyers for this phony Russian probe and plans to hire more.
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
This is Minneapolis, a hotbed of jihad terror activity.
But the city doesn’t set up a helpline for Muslims to report jihad
activity. Oh, no. That would be “Islamophobic.” This is a helpline for
Muslims to report incidents of “Islamophobia,” including, no doubt, rude
remarks that are not criminal, and accurate analysis of the motivating
ideology behind jihad terror activity.
“Hate speech hotlines operate as government enforcement of fascism,”
said former Rep. Michele Bachmann. “They are a denial of free speech and
the very definition of government censorship. Looking for government
informants to rat out speech the government forbids goes to the heart of
denying American citizens our inalienable rights. Governments CAN NOT
do this under our constitution.”
Indeed. But no one seems to care very much about that anymore.
“Minneapolis installs Shariah hotline for ‘hate speech’ snitches,” by Leo Hohmann, WND, June 21, 2017:
The city of Minneapolis has set up a hotline for
residents to report suspected hate crimes, including “speech and
actions,” according to statements on the city’s website.
The city, which will operate the “service” through its 3-1-1
helpline, is targeting any “harassing behaviors motivated by prejudice,”
according to a press release. Those wishing to report a hate crime from outside the city may dial 612-673-3000.
According to the local newspaper, the Star-Tribune,
“the announcement comes amid signs of a recent surge of such incidents
affecting Muslims and Jews across the country, many of which go
unreported.”
The city’s Department of Civil Rights clearly states on its website that it only enforces hate crimes against certain “protected classes.”
A city official further indicated the impetus for the hate-crimes
hotline was the election of President Trump and that the targets would
be his supporters.
“Since the general election, many of us have experienced, witnessed
firsthand or heard of actions of: racism, xenophobia, sexism and bigotry
directed at people here and in cities across the United States,”
Minneapolis Department of Civil Rights Director Velma Korbel wrote in a statement posted on the city’s website. “In no uncertain terms, hate-motivated speech and actions have no place in Minneapolis nor will they be tolerated.”
Korbel said the city’s tough stance on “hate” is reflected in the
views of its mayor, Betsy Hodges. Korbel states on the city website:
This department echoes Minneapolis mayor, Betsy Hodges’
resolve and commitment when she stated: “I will not compromise the
public safety of the people of Minneapolis to satisfy Trump’s desire to
put politics before public safety. Minneapolis is being built and
strengthened by people from all over the world and I am grateful for
their commitment to our city. I stand with them today and will continue
to take that stand as the President-elect prepares to take office.”
Michele Bachmann, former congresswoman from Minnesota, decried the
new hotline as a form of fascism in which citizens are encouraged to
turn in their neighbors for holding opinions deemed forbidden by the
state.
She said such prior restraints are not allowed under the U.S. Constitution and would not hold up in court.
“Hate speech hotlines operate as government enforcement of fascism,”
she said in an email to WND. “They are a denial of free speech and the
very definition of government censorship.
“Looking for government informants to rat out speech the government
forbids goes to the heart of denying American citizens our inalienable
rights. Governments CAN NOT do this under our constitution.”
Bachmann said the hate-crime hotline is a stealth move by Hodges and
the city council to impose Islamic anti-blasphemy laws on non-Muslims.
“By installing Islamic anti-blasphemy hotlines and advertising for
informants, Minneapolis is violating the doctrine of separation of
church and state,” she added. “What difference is there between the
Minneapolis City Council action and United Nations resolution 16/18
advanced by former Secretary Hillary Clinton?”
U.N Resolution 16/18 encouraged nations to criminalize speech that defames a person’s religious views.
Pushed by the Organization of Islamic Cooperation, the only speech
the resolution sought to criminalized was speech critical of Islam,
Bachmann said. After years of failure, the resolution only passed after
the language was somewhat watered down.
“Which is interesting, since the OIC continually proclaims death to
the Jews, death to Israel,” she said. “The citizens of Minneapolis
surely can’t be that easily bamboozled into giving away their First
Amendment rights to free of speech.”…
The press release announcing the new hotline gives a broad definition
of “discrimination,” citing any “action or a decision that treats a
person or a group negatively for reasons such as their race, religion,
disability, sexual orientation, ethnicity, gender or gender identity.”
The release also places local police on notice, stating:
If you, your family or someone you know experiences discrimination
based on race, religion, national origin, sex, LGBT status or other
protected classes, or has been the victim of police misconduct, please
call 612-673-3012 or visit www.minneapolismn.gov/civilrights.
Shahram Hadian, whose family fled Iran in the run-up to the Islamic
revolution in 1978, said he was aghast at the Minneapolis hotline.
“This is ultimately what they got passed up in Canada. But this is
the backdoor approach to eventually setting up hate speech laws … hate
crimes morph into hate speech,” said Hadian, a former law enforcement
officer turned pastor who heads Truth In Love Ministries.
“It’s crazy to think my family left Iran because of the impending
Islamic State to come to this nation because of its freedom – and what
other freedom is more precious than your freedom of speech? – and now to
see this backdoor attempt to try to impose hate speech laws.”
Hadian said there would be no logical need for a special hate hotline
because the federal government already has hate-crime laws on the
books.
“This is trying to normalize the concept of trying to turn people in,
and if that doesn’t send shivers down your spine when you think of
1930s Germany, nothing will,” Hadian said.
The Minneapolis City Council last fall passed a resolution condemning violence and hate speech against Muslims.
Hadian said he has no doubt that the Minneapolis officials will seek to target Christians with the new snitch line.
“Obviously it’s moving toward Shariah compliance. This is what Europe
has done,” he said. “You have people arrested there, various examples
of it, and charged with crimes for something they said about Islam. So
this is a back-door attempt to get hate speech laws on the books and to
create the environment of normalcy where you’re going to see Christians
turned in to the government because we are either speaking about
Christianity or because we’re speaking factually about Islam.
“It’s a violation of our fundamental rights under the First
Amendment. That’s chilling, and it’s so disturbing and underhanded what
they’re doing, to say, ‘Let’s start turning people in whom we don’t
agree with.’”
Hadian said the hotline will have a chilling effect on pastors and lecturers in Minnesota.
“So what, the next time I give a presentation, if someone gets
offended, are they going to report me?” he said. “That’s where we’re
headed with this.”
Outside of Minneapolis-St. Paul and Duluth, every county in Minnesota voted for Trump in the November general election.
The people of Minnesota are growing tired of the coercive rule of
intolerant Democrats like Hodges and Gov. Mark Dayton, said Debra
Anderson, who chairs the state’s ACT! For America chapter.
“Communities throughout Minnesota are suffering greatly from the
never-ending demands of Muslims and their civilization jihad, and there
is growing alarm about the increasing threats of and acts of violence
perpetrated by Muslims against non-Muslims (jihad terrorism),” Anderson
wrote in an email.
“This resolution and the hate-speech hotline serves to not only
invalidate the legitimate concerns of indigenous Minnesotans, but also
to silence them,” she said. “I find myself thinking, ‘While our
government leaders’ fundamentally transform our communities (destroy
America),’ they command, ‘Don’t you dare utter a peep … or else!’
“Unfortunately, this is only one of many examples of how our
‘captured’ government is striving to fundamentally transform the Land of
10,000 Lakes into Marxist/Islamist utopia that does not tolerate
dissidents or infidels.”
Bob Enos, another Minnesotan, who recently ran for city council in
Willmar, said he believes the hotline is patently unconstitutional if it
bans or seeks to chill any type of speech.
“Free speech has never been a crime under the U.S. Constitution, hateful or otherwise,” he said.
A search of the Star-Tribune’s stories printed since Jan. 1, 2017, lists only one alleged hate crime against Muslims.
“This new hotline is nothing but a red herring, designed to
ingratiate Minneapolis Mayor Betsy Hodges to the growing Somali voting
bloc. Hence, her photos donning the Muslim hijab,” Enos said.
Enos said it was significant that Islamic preachers are exempt from
the hate crimes prosecuted by Minneapolis, because they are regarded as a
“protected class.”
“After all, the Quran contains at least 109 verses which promote
graphic violence against all non-believers; most especially Jews,” he
said. “So, is not any cleric who promotes the teachings of the Quran
also promoting hate speech?
“This enforcement of standards of speech that Minneapolis’ Democratic
leadership finds acceptable is Minneapolis’ version of an intellectual
Taliban.”
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
American Special Forces have “boots on the ground” and are helping
Philippine troops and police fight Islamist rebels in the Southern town
of Marawi, according to U.S. and local officials cited in news reports
around the world. The news comes after firebrand Filipino President
Rodrigo Duterte, accused of extra-judicial killings as part of his war
on drugs, repeatedly threatened to evict all U.S. troops from the Philippines.
A number of legal concerns have been raised surrounding the operations
for both governments. However, with officials and media outlets arguing
that the fighting is aimed at stopping Islamists supposedly “loyal” to
the Islamic State (ISIS), even as U.S. forces bomb the enemies of ISIS in Syria, the legal issues have been mostly swept under the rug so far. The ongoing battle, which centers around the largely Islamic town of
Marawi on Mindanao island, began in May, when Islamist militants under
the leadership of alleged terrorist Isnilon Hapilon overran the area.
Since then, Filipino forces, with U.S. support, have been battling those
jihadists with bombs, planes, and guns, leaving the town of some
200,000 people looking like a “ghost town,” reporters said. According to
media reports citing officials, hundreds of “militants” have been
killed in the fighting, along with more than 50 soldiers and dozens of
civilians. As of last week, some 20 percent of the city was reportedly
still under the control of the rebels, whom various officials and media
reports have said are trying to create a new province for the Islamic
State “Caliphate” in the predominantly Catholic Philippines. The entire
island of Mindanao is under martial law, and the city is reportedly
close to ruins.
The Filipino military officials and U.S. embassy officials who
admitted the role of U.S. troops there have all claimed that American
forces were not actually involved in combat. Technically, that may be
correct, if combat includes only shooting. However, despite earlier
official statements claiming there were not even U.S. boots “on the
ground” near the hostilities, it turns out that American forces are,
indeed, operating “on the ground” in and around Marawi, and presumably
they are all wearing boots. U.S. troops are reportedly helping with
everything from training local forces to gathering intelligence and
conducting surveillance. A local camera crew even caught a group of
American operatives flying a drone from a truck near the
battlefield.
The U.S. embassy in Manila confirmed that U.S. forces were aiding
Filipino authorities in the war, but denied that they were involved in
combat operations. “At the request of the government of the Philippines,
U.S. special operations forces are assisting the AFP with ongoing
operations in Marawi that helps AFP commanders on the ground in their
fight against Maute and ASG militants,” an embassy spokesperson was
quoted as saying, with ASG referring to the Islamist Abu Sayyaf group
and the AFP a reference to the Armed Forces of the Philippines. The U.S.
military also confirmed that Special Forces were giving “security
assistance and training” to their counterparts in intelligence,
surveillance, and reconnaissance. “For security reasons, we are not able
to to discuss specific technical details,” the Pentagon statement
added.
And finally, Filipino military officials confirmed the scheming as
well. Brigadier-General Restituto Padilla, for example, while he denied
that U.S. troops were actually in combat, admitted that the group of men
captured on film operating drones from a truck were in fact U.S.
troops. “In a battle the most important item for the commander is to be
able to determine what is happening,” Padilla said to explain why the
U.S. troops were doing that. “It’s called situational awareness and that
is the sort of assistance being given.” He did admit, too, that
American forces were carrying rifles and were authorized to shoot if
fired upon, which is fairly standard when U.S. troops assist their
foreign counterparts on or near a battlefield. In a strange twist,
President Duterte claimed repeatedly he was not aware of U.S. aid amid
the battle.
It was not clear under what constitutional authority U.S. forces were
supposedly operating under in the latest clashes to break out in the
Philippines. But there have been no declarations of war by Congress
authorizing the intervention. Instead of the constitutionally required
declaration, U.S. officials have argued that the support for Filipino
forces was part of a “counter-terrorism” program. An official statement
cited in press reports also noted that U.S. Special Forces have been
providing “support and assistance” to their counterparts in the
Philippines “for many years,” as if that legitimized it. Various
establishment media organs and officials have implied that a mutual
defense treaty from the 1951 even requires U.S. forces to aid the
Filipino government.
The U.S. Constitution, of course, requires that the U.S. Congress issue an official declaration of war
before the United States is committed to war. The Founders insisted on
it, because they wanted the American people's elected representatives to
have a proper debate prior to entering a war. They also sought to
prevent a situation in which one person could embroil America in foreign
conflicts. And yet, the last time Congress actually declared war was
during World War II. Since then, legal quackery has been used to develop
a variety of pseudo-“legal arguments” purporting to authorize the
deployment of U.S. troops to fight all manner of wars abroad. On more
than a few occasions — most recently in Libya, with disastrous effects
— U.S. forces have been illegally used to overthrow foreign governments
under the guise of enforcing unconstitutional United Nations
resolutions. But in theory, at least, the Constitution remains the
supreme law of the land.
It was also not clear whether the U.S. operations were legal or
authorized under Filipino law. As far as the Philippines is concerned,
the deployment of U.S. troops might be considered unconstitutional,
according to news reports and various analysts. The Filipino
Constitution prohibits foreign combat troops operating on Philippines'
soil. But top officials were quick to deny that the support being
provided so far was unconstitutional. “What is prohibited under the
Constitution is the joining of U.S. troops in actual combat,” Justice
Secretary Vitaliano Aguirre II was quoted as arguing in news reports.
“But sharing of intelligence and equipment is allowed under the EDCA
(Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement).” The EDCA is the legal
agreement that purports to authorize the U.S. military presence in the
Philippines.
While President Duterte conceded that his military men were very pro-American, public calls for evicting U.S. troops have been growing louder for years.
Duterte himself, who often speaks in obscenities and even described
former U.S. President Obama as the offspring of a prostitute, using more
vulgar terms, has expressed outrage toward the U.S. government on
multiple occasions. In view of his disagreements between the two sides,
he appears to be hoping for a stronger alliance with the Communist
Chinese dictatorship in Beijing instead. Much of the press coverage of
his administration in the international media has focused on his highly
controversial war on drugs and widespread allegations of extra-judicial
killings of drug dealers. Some analysts have argued that his allegedly
narrow focus on fighting drugs left the Philippines vulnerable to
jihadists groups, as evidenced most recently by the takeover of
Marawi.
Of course, on the campaign trail, then-candidate Donald Trump hit the nail on the head when he exposed the true origins of ISIS. Far from being some sort of organic development, official U.S. military documents revealed
that the Obama administration and its allies — including Arab dictators
and European governments — were supporting an uprising in Syria that
they knew was led by al-Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood. One
of the goals, according to a 2012 U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency
document obtained by Judicial Watch, was the creation of a “salafist
principality” in Eastern Syria. Today, that principality is known as the
Islamic State, or ISIS. “In many respects, ISIS is honoring President
Obama,” Trump said at a campaign rally, referring to Obama by his full
name, Barack Hussein Obama. “He's the founder of ISIS. He's the founder.
He founded ISIS. And I would say the co-founder would be Crooked
Hillary Clinton.”
Instead of getting American troops embroiled in all sorts of foreign
quarrels and wars, and squandering American money and lives variously
supporting and then opposing both dictators and terrorists, Congress and
the Trump administration should follow the Constitution and the advice
of America's Founders. That means, first of all, no more committing U.S.
troops to conflicts without a proper declaration of war, as required by
the Constitution — and that, following a thorough debate on the
objectives and merits of U.S. involvement. Second, it means Washington,
D.C., must quit going abroad seeking “monsters to destroy,” as John
Quincy Adams put it. Not only would that save American lives and vast
sums of taxpayer wealth, it would also probably leave the world a better
place. Plus, it's the law. The people and the authorities of the
Philippines are perfectly capable of handling these problems without
U.S. “help.”
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
The pain and grief suffered by the parents of Otto Warmbier, the
American college student sentenced to 15 years of hard labor for
allegedly stealing a propaganda poster while in North Korea last year, was evident in their statement issued Monday afternoon:
It is our sad duty to report that our
son, Otto Warmbier, has completed his journey home. Surrounded by his
loving family, Otto died today in 2:20pm.
It would be easy at a moment like this to
focus on all that we lost — future time that won't be spent with a
warm, engaging, brilliant young man whose curiosity and enthusiasm for
life knew no bounds. But we choose to focus on the time we were given to
be with this remarkable person. You can tell from the outpouring of
emotion from the communities that he touched — Wyoming, Ohio and the
University of Virginia to name just two — that the love for Otto went
well beyond his immediate family.
The statement put the lie to the claim by his captors that Otto died
as a result of botulism early in his captivity. Instead, he died as a
result of torture:
We would like to thank the wonderful
professionals at the University of Cincinnati Medical Center who did
everything they could for Otto. Unfortunately, the awful torturous
mistreatment our son received at the hands of the North Koreans ensured
that no other outcome was possible beyond the sad one we experienced
today.
President Donald Trump’s condolences to Otto’s family reflected the same assessment:
Otto's fate deepens my Administration's
determination to prevent such tragedies from befalling innocent people
at the hands of regimes that do not respect the rule of law or basic
human decency. The United States once again condemns the brutality of
the North Korean regime as we mourn its latest victim.
Former Ambassador to the UN John Bolton called Otto’s treatment at
the hands of North Korea “barbaric but typical,” adding, “This is a
regime that’s capable of almost anything.” After running a series of tests on the comatose young man, officials
at the University of Cincinnati Medical Center said that his “extensive
loss of brain tissue” suggested that his brain lost its blood supply for
an extended period of time early in his captivity. Wikipedia’s summary
of those tests reveals the extent of the brain damage Warmbier suffered
at the hands of his captors:
Neurologist Daniel Kanter, director of
the neurocritical care program at University of Cincinnati Medical
Center, said on June 15 that Warmbier was in "a state of unresponsive
wakefulness" — a condition commonly known as persistent vegetative
state. He was able to breathe on his own, and blink his eyes, but
otherwise did not respond to his environment.
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed
he had suffered extensive loss of brain tissue throughout his brain.
Kanter stated that Warmbier's brain injury was typical of a cardiac
arrest that caused the brain to be denied oxygen.
Doctors also said that they did not find
any evidence of physical abuse or torture; scans of Warmbier's neck and
head were normal outside of the brain injury. Doctors said they did not
know what caused the cardiac arrest, but that it could have been
triggered by a respiratory arrest, while a neurointensive care
specialist at the hospital stated that there was no evidence indicating
botulism.
Part of the regimen of brutality in North Korea’s “torture camps”
includes immersing prisoners in water tanks up to their noses. In
FoxNews.com’s story covering the matter, one female prisoner “indicated
that she was fully immersed in cold water for hours. Only when she stood
on her tiptoes would her nose be barely above the water level.” Added
FoxNews, “It’s possible that drowning could have led to the kind of
oxygen deprivation that Warmbier’s doctors are reportedly seeing.” This is standard procedure for the dictatorship, according to Joshua
Stanton. An attorney with 18 years of both military and civilian
experience in the “art” of North Korean torture techniques who
frequently testifies before congressional committees about North Korea’s
atrocities, Stanton wrote:
By North Korean standards [Warmbier's
treatment] was entirely ordinary. For North Koreans, brutality is an
everyday fear, whether they’re market traders being extorted and beaten
by corrupt MSS officers, women refugees who are beaten after being
repatriated by China, women in Kangan Province who are raped by soldiers
with impunity, or the child prisoners in places like Camp 16, where
death rates may be as high as 20 percent each year.
To suggest that Warmbier’s death was caused by botulism is a canard
fostered by the sub-humans running North Korea. In a tearful network
interview, Otto’s father Fred Warmbier said, “We don’t believe anything
that they say. There’s no excuse for the way the North Koreans treated
our son.” His father added that Otto was “brutalized and terrorized by
the pariah regime.”
Plamegate
