THE CHURCH MILITANT
Ephesians 5:11-"And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather expose them". This Christian News Blog maintains a one stop resource of current news and reports of its own related to church, moral, spiritual, and related political issues, plus articles, and postings from other online discernment ministries, and media which share the aims to obey the biblical commands to shed light on and refute error, heresy, apostasy, cults, and spiritual abuse.
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
This is an intelligence briefing. Here I present the bare bones of what has been happening before our eyes…if we would see it. Once
upon a time, there was an industrial combine in Nazi Germany called IG
Farben. It was the largest chemical/pharmaceutical octopus in the world.
It owned companies, and it had favorable business agreements with
companies from England to Central America to Japan.
The author of The Devil’s Chemists,
Josiah DuBois, traveled to Guatemala, on a fact-finding mission, in the
early days of World War 2, and returned with the comment that, as far
as he could tell, Guatemala was “a wholly owned subsidiary of Farben.”
The pharmaceutical empire was and is one of the major forces behind
the European Union (EU). It is no accident that these drug corporations
wield such power. They aren’t only involved in controlling the medical
cartel; they are political planners.
This is how and why Big
Pharma fits so closely with what is loosely referred to as the New World
Order. The aim of enrolling every human in a cradle-to-grave system of
disease diagnosis and toxic drug treatment has a larger purpose: to
debilitate, to weaken populations.
This is a political goal. It facilitates control.
IG
Farben’s main component companies, at the outbreak of World War 2, were
Bayer, BASF, and Hoechst. They were chemical and drug companies. Farben
put Hitler over the top in Germany as head of State, and the war was
designed to lead to a united Europe that would be dominated by the
Farben nexus.
The loss of the war didn’t derail that plan. It was
shifted into an economic blueprint, which became, eventually, the
European Union.
The European Commission’s first president was
Walter Hallstein, the Nazi lawyer who, during the war, had been in
charge of post-war legal planning for the new Europe.
As the Rath
Foundation reports: In 1939, on the brink of the war, Hallstein had
stated, “The creation of the New Law [of the Nazis] is ONLY the task of
the law-makers!”
In 1957, with his reputation sanitized, Hallstein
spoke the words in this manner: “The European Commission has full and
unlimited power for all decisions related to the architecture of this
European community.”
Post-war, IG Farben was broken up into
separate companies, but those companies (Bayer, Hoechst, and BASF) came
roaring back, attaining new profit highs.
I refer you to the
explosive book, The Nazi Roots of the Brussels EU, by Paul Anthony
Taylor, Aleksandra Niedzwiecki, Dr. Matthias Rath, and August Kowalczyk.
You can read it at relay-of-life.com. It is a dagger in the heart of
the EU.
At the Rath Foundation, you can also read Joseph Borkin’s classic, “The Crime and Punishment of IG Farben.”
In
1992, I was deeply engaged in researching the specific devastating
effects of medical drugs. Eventually, I concluded that, at the highest
levels of power, these drugs weren’t destructive by accident. They were
intended to cause harm. This was covert chemical warfare against the
population of the planet. The Rockefeller-Standard Oil-Farben connection
was a primary piece of the puzzle.
It was, of course, Rockefeller
(and Carnegie) power that had forced the birth of pharmaceutical
medicine in America, with the publication of the 1910 Flexner Report.
The Report was used to excoriate and marginalize Chiropractic,
Homeopathy, Naturopathy, and other forms of traditional natural
practice, in favor of what would become the modern juggernaut of
drug-based treatment.
In an article about the FDA, “Medical Murder
in the Matrix,” I point out the fact that this federal agency has
permitted at least 100,000 deaths of Americans, per year, from the
direct effects of drugs it, the FDA, has certified as safe. (See, for
example, JAMA, July 26, 2000, ‘Is US Health Really the Best in the
World,’ Dr. Barbara Starfield.)
The FDA knows these death figures. “Unintended” and “accidental” can no longer be applied to this ongoing holocaust.
The pharmaceutical industry itself also knows those death figures.
To
understand the dimensions and history of the ongoing chemical warfare
against the population, in the form of medical drugs (and of course
pesticides), one must factor in the original octopus, IG Farben.
World War 2 never ended. It simply shifted its strategies.
In
any fascist system, the bulk of the people working inside the system,
including scientists, refuse to believe the evidence of what is
happening before their own eyes. They insist they are doing good. They
believe they are on the right side. They see greater top-down control as
necessary and correct. They adduce “reasonable” explanations for
inflicted harm and death.
World War 2 is still underway. The battleground has been changed, and the means are far cleverer.
Sun
Tzu wrote: “Hence to fight and conquer in all your battles is not
supreme excellence; supreme excellence consists in breaking the enemy’s
resistance without fighting…The best victory is when the opponent
surrenders of its own accord before there are any actual hostilities…It
is best to win without fighting.”
This is what has been happening: invisible warfare.
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
The Swedish government has
announced that a clinic in Stockholm will no longer treat female rape
victims and the money will be spent on treating ‘traumatized’ Muslim
migrants instead.
After 10
years of helping rape victims, the Stockholm Crisis and Trauma Center
“will now only devote itself to patients with war and torture trauma,” reports SVT.
Authorities
in Stockholm claim their agreement with the clinic does not cover rape
victims and the focus will now be moved to treating migrants with
“psychological problems are associated with torture or severe trauma
from war,” despite the fact that the majority of migrants pouring into
Sweden are not arriving from war-torn countries.
According to Maria Hägerstrand, Unit
Manager for Psychiatry in Stockholm County Council, “This is a group
that is now expanding with the major migration flows that exist and we
want them to be able to help even more in that group in the future.”
The
clinic helps around 200 rape victims annually, with around 140 of these
being women. All of them will now have to find somewhere else to
receive support.
The clinic said it was “very surprised” that authorities announced their intention to cancel the agreement.
“Unfortunately, I do not think everyone will get the care they need,” said Fredrik Garpe.
Birgitta
Sevefjord, a member of the Stockholm City Council, said the decision
was “completely insane” and that “nobody else in the county council can
meet these women’s needs.”
“There is no one who will take care of them, it’s actually a scandal,” she added.
The
horrible irony here of course is that a significant percentage of
current and future rape victims to use the clinic would have been
victims of migrant rapists given that Sweden is now the rape capital of
Europe thanks to its open border policy.
Rapes
have skyrocketed in Sweden over recent years. Authorities have claimed
that this is due to the definition of rape being changed, but the spike
occurred long after the change was made.
Sex crimes in the country have doubled since 2012. The most recently available statistics showed that immigrants were 5.5 times more likely to carry out sexual assaults.
In February we reported
on how a Swedish woman was brutally gang raped and racially abused by a
group of men in Gothenburg who also live streamed the assault to
Facebook, but police were disinterested when the case was brought to
their attention.
When I started practice, everybody only got
two [vaccines] at a time. And I actually began to see problems with it
even early on because when I started practice we used the original DPT.
So, kids on monitors, I noticed that they had increased alarms after
vaccines. So I made sure that they were aggressive with fever control
and things afterward. And then, as time went on in the late 80s they
started to increase the number of vaccines, and I had a problem with
that because giving just two at a time was hard enough but now they
wanted to give four or five, six at a time. So I made the decision at
that time that our practice would only give two at a time. It was never
more than two at a time. And then, as more time went on, I started
seeing truly vaccine injured kids. I started seeing a lot of autistic
children and their parents all said the same thing. They said my child
was fine till they got this shot and then within a week we lost him.
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
If you thought Hillary Clinton would stop talking any time soon then think again. The
defeated presidential candidate told a fundraiser for a youth program
that the best way to stop terrorism was to “understand” other cultures
and their food. Yes, really. Hillary defended London Mayor Sadiq Khan, the man who once represented
9/11 Al-Qaeda member Zacarias Moussaoui, called moderate Muslims “Uncle
Toms” and said terrorism was “part and parcel” of living in a major
city.
Clinton said that Khan, who has called for Donald Trump to be banned
from entering the UK for a state visit (while actual terrorists from
Syria are free to return), had shown “steady, determined leadership”. Hillary
said the best way of combating terror was to “reach out to the world”
in order to “understand” people living in foreign countries. “Getting to know one another. Learning about the experiences, the lives, the cultures, the religions, the food,” she added.
One wonders what kind of “cultures” Clinton is referring to? Maybe the ‘culture’ of Bacha bāzī,
where elderly Muslim men dress up young boys as girls and then rape
them? Or could she be referring to female genital mutilation? Another
expression of Islamic ‘culture’ now endorsed by imams living in America.
“This
is not a time to lash out, to incite fear or to use tragedy and terror
for political gain,” said Clinton, a comment obviously aimed at Donald
Trump and anyone else who has correctly identified political correctness
and tolerance of Islamism as creating a fertile ground for terrorist
attacks in the west.
Maybe Hillary is right. Maybe we don’t need
to arrest the thousands of jihadists who walk our streets. Maybe we
don’t need to stop terrorists who have fought alongside ISIS in Syria
and Iraq from returning to the west. Maybe we just need to get a better grip on the dietary habits of Muslims. Who
knew it would be this easy to stop suicide bombers, rampaging knifemen
and jihadists who plough vehicles into crowds of people?
Hillary
Clinton has once more come to the rescue of America. Completely ending
terrorism over night by understand the Islamic culture and their food.
Thank you, Hillary Clinton.
EXCERPTS: "Based on evidence seized from her home, federal prosecutors detailed
Winner’s alleged plans to burn down the White House and travel to
Afghanistan, pledging her allegiance to the Taliban."
"Prosecutors said she also instructed family members to transfer $30,000
into her mother’s account so she’d appear poor enough for a
court-appointed attorney."
Paul
Joseph Watson breaks down Reality Winner, the NSA leaker, her beliefs,
as advertised on her own social media sites, and what led her to release
the classified documents from the NSA.
Potential Deep State Leaker Reality Leigh Winner Gets Discovered by FBI and Arrested
Published on Jun 6, 2017
Reality
Leigh Winner has been named as the source of a leaked report on
Russia’s involvement with the United States’ election. She is a 25 year
old Air Force veteran who originally comes from Texas where she worked
as a linguist and yoga instructor. Currently, she lives in Augusta,
Georgia where she is an employee of Pluribus International Corporation.
Her employer is a sub-contractor of the NSA. Winner apparently has
many accomplishments in her life including having a top-secret security
clearance. The security clearance she has may have enabled her to gain
direct access to an NSA site in Georgia to download and print the
documents in question, which she leaked to “The Intercept.”
The
federal government was tipped off about this leak from The Intercept
itself because of their attempt to get the document verified after the
source (Reality Winner) dropped it off to them. At this point, the FBI
gets involved and Winner is nearly immediately identified as the leaker.
Within the first few days of the article featuring the leaked Russia
report going up on The Intercept’s website, she was arrested.
This
could very well be a deep state operation in which the young lady in
question was used as a patsy or the proverbial “fall guy.” One thing to
note here is that she would have had no business dealing with that
information at all. So the question must be … how did she know where to
look for it? The NSA must have all types of security layers that
prevent information from being easily found and stolen even for those
who have top level security clearances. Reality Winner’s social media
was full of anti-Trump rhetoric, so it would have been easy for
high-level shadowy figures to single her out as a weak link to use in
their ploy to undermine the President.
Who Is Reality Winner? The 25-year-old Air Force Veteran has been charged with mailing classified material to a news outlet. https://www.theatlantic.com/news/arch...
If The UK Continues To Fail Its Citizens English Men Will Take The Law Into Their Own Hands
Tommy Robinson Confronts Didsbury Mosque
Hosting Hate Preachers
The Manchester attacker's mosque completely exposed
Tommy Robinson paid a visit to the mosque attended by
Manchester attacker Salman Abedi. It has recently been proven that the
mosque has distributed anti-western propaganda and hosted a number of
radical preachers. This video first appeared at therebel.media
ISIS Fighters Should Be Tried And Executed,
Not Imported By Libtard Gov'ts
Published on Jun 6, 2017
Islam
has been at war with the West for hundreds of years, no other religion
or ideology is as incompatible and destructive as Islam.
Trump berates London’s Muslim mayor over response to jihad attacks in London
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
President Trump has taken London Mayor Sadiq Khan to task for his
grossly insensitive statement about the London jihadist attack:
“At least 7 dead and 48 wounded in terror attack,” the
president wrote on his personal Twitter account, “and Mayor of London
says there is ‘no reason to be alarmed!’”
Only a “leader” with either an unsound mind or an unsavory agenda
could utter such bizarre words following a gruesome jihad rampage
(within two weeks of the one Manchester) that began with the mowing down
of innocent civilians and continued with a 12-inch blade “knife
frenzy.” All the while, the jihadis shouted “this is for Allah.” Khan’s words start to look more sinister than obtuse when one considers his own jihadist connections. He was reported by the UK’s Spectator to have known links to “extremists”:
Some of these associations date back to his time as a
director of Liberty and a human rights lawyer – trying to get the UK to
lift its ban on the American Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan, who
has described Jews as ‘blood-suckers’ and called Hitler ‘a very great
man, and speaking at the same conference as Sajeel Abu Ibrahim, a member
of the now proscribed Islamist organisation that trained the 7/7 bomber
Mohammad Sidique Khan.
in 2004 he appeared on a platform with five Islamic
extremists at a conference in London organised by Al-Aqsa, a group that
has published works by the notorious Holocaust denier Paul Eisen….In the
same year, Khan was the chair of the Muslim Council of Britain’s legal
affairs committee and was involved in defending the Muslim scholar Dr Yusuf Al-Qaradawi.
Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi, the most renowned and prominent
Muslim cleric in the world, has stated: “The Muslim jurists are
unanimous that apostates must be punished, yet they differ as to
determining the kind of punishment to be inflicted upon them. The
majority of them, including the four main schools of jurisprudence
(Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi’i, and Hanbali) as well as the other four schools
of jurisprudence (the four Shiite schools of Az-Zaidiyyah,
Al-Ithna-‘ashriyyah, Al-Ja’fariyyah, and Az-Zaheriyyah) agree that
apostates must be executed.”
In September, Khan stated that
it was necessary for Westerners to be careful not to insult Muslims and
to affirm that Muslims can hold Western values, otherwise they would
join jihad groups. In other words, Khan was warning non-Muslims to
beware of insulting Muslims, otherwise they would kill you.
Also, it did not matter that jihad attacks in Britain tripled in five years: Khan boasted in March that he planned on bringing in 1,500,000 more migrants.
Khan should have never become Mayor of London in the first place,
given his unsavory background. His plan to bring 1,500,000 more migrants
to London will further expose London to jihad attacks and
infiltration.
The West is in a self-induced crisis and needs to end the practice of
putting political correctness before the wellbeing of its own citizens.
“Donald Trump berates London mayor over response to terror attacks”, by Martin Pengelley, Guardian, June 4, 2017:
Donald Trump has criticised the mayor of London, hours
after seven people were killed and 48 injured in a terror attack in the
centre of the city.
“At least 7 dead and 48 wounded in terror attack,” the president
wrote on his personal Twitter account, “and Mayor of London says there
is ‘no reason to be alarmed!’”
In response, a spokesman for Sadiq Khan said the mayor had “more
important things to do than respond to Donald Trump’s ill-informed tweet
that deliberately takes out of context his remarks”.
Khan commented on the attacks in a statement overnight and in a
television interview earlier on Sunday. In the interview, he said there
was “no reason to be alarmed” by an increased and armed police presence
in the city that day.
In his statement on Saturday night, issued as the London Bridge
attack unfolded, Khan said: “Metropolitan police are responding to the
horrific terrorist attack at London Bridge and Borough Market.” He
added: “My thoughts are with everyone affected, and I’d like to thank
the brave men and women of our emergency services who were first on the
scene and will be working throughout the night.
“This was a deliberate and cowardly attack on innocent Londoners and
visitors to our city enjoying their Saturday night,” he said. “I condemn
it in the strongest possible terms. There is no justification
whatsoever for such barbaric acts.”
In the television interview on Sunday morning, Khan said the UK
general election, scheduled for Thursday, should go ahead as planned. He
added: “There aren’t words to describe the grief and anger that our
city will be facing today. I’m appalled and furious that these cowardly
terrorists would deliberately target innocent Londoners.
“There can be no justification for the acts of these terrorists and I am quite clear that we will never let them win.
“My message to Londoners and visitors to our great city is to be calm
and vigilant today. You will see an increased police presence today,
including armed officers and uniformed officers. There is no reason to
be alarmed by this. We are the safest global city in the world. You saw
last night as a consequence of our planning, our preparation, the
rehearsals that take place, the swift response from the emergency
services tackling the terrorists and also helping the injured.”
After Trump’s tweet, a spokesperson for Khan said: “The mayor is busy
working with the police, emergency services and the government to
coordinate the response to this horrific and cowardly terrorist attack
and provide leadership and reassurance to Londoners and visitors to our
city.
“He has more important things to do than respond to Donald Trump’s
ill-informed tweet that deliberately takes out of context his remarks
urging Londoners not to be alarmed when they saw more police – including
armed officers – on the streets.”…
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
You can set your watch to it. In the wake of very jihad terror
attack, no matter how heinous and horrifying, in come the washerwomen
with buckets of dirty water working double time to scrub and censor the
motive from the attack. Once the stage is sufficiently washed and
prepped, in march the jihadis in the information battle-space,
silver-tongued snakes selling Islam-is-peace snake oil to an over-eager media audience braying for more.
CNN stages a fake Muslim protest (watch):
CNN had to stage it. Because there are never any Muslim protests
against jihad or female genital mutilation or gender apartheid or creed
apartheid or Islamic antisemitism. I have yet to see CNN, BBC or any of
the enemedia news outlets go to the hospitals and interview the victims
or speak to the mutilated, maimed, deformed little girls with holes in
their faces who attended the Manchester pop concert.
No matter the monstrosity, nothing changes. If the torn, dismembered
bodies of little girls at an Ariana Grande concert were not a
game-changer, then nothing will move the conquered and the unmovable.
Not only do we, the victims, have to clean up the flesh and bone and
blood running down the pavement, we must subject ourselves to endless
dawah (proselytizing) for Islam on mind-numbing news shows on the BBC,
CNN, MSNBC, and the like. FOX is lost. Sunday morning, Fox and Friends
had on liar and deceiver Mubin Shaikh (Robert Spencer debated him here), Shaikh said “we must never equate Islam and terrorism.” The hosts nodded gravely. There is nowhere on TV you can get reality.
Teddy bears, candlelight vigils and hashtags will not defeat jihad.
Islamic terror-tied groups like CAIR rub their hooves in glee in the
wake of every Islamic attack. After the body count, it’s their turn to
wage jihad in the information battle-space.
One of the jihadis said, “I’m ready to do whatever I need to
do in the name of Allah. I am ready in the name of Allah to do what
needs to be done, including killing my own mother.”
What further proof does anyone need? Why the madness and irrational
denial? Sixteen years after 9/11 and over thirty thousand deadly Islamic
attacks, this is where we are? Yes, deliberate delusion and collusion
continues. As I have so often lamented, in the wake of horrific jihad
terror comes the post-jihad dawah (proselytizing for Islam).
While jihadis scream “Allahu akbar” and “takbir,” elites in the media
and academia assure us it is not about Allah or Islam.
As for the Muslims laughing and shouting “Allahu akbar!” in the wake of the attacks, you won’t ever read about that in the enemedia.
Nor will you hear much about these scenes from the London jihad slaughter (as reported in the Guardian):
–“He just stepped outside the bar for a second and a
man ran up to him and said: ‘This is for my family, this is for Islam’,
and stuck a knife straight in him. He’s got a seven-inch scar going from
his belly round to his back,” Elizabeth O’Neill told reporters outside
King’s College hospital.
–The van was “probably travelling at about 50 miles an hour” and hit “five or six people.”
–According to another witness, Eric, the men inside jumped out once
the van crashed and “ran towards the people that they nearly ran over”. “[Then] they literally just started kicking them, punching them, they took out knives… it was a rampage really,” he said.
One man, Gerard, told the BBC he saw a woman being stabbed “10 or 15 times” by men shouting “This is for Allah.”
Nor will you hear much about the words spoken to a mother in London before a jihadi plunged a knife into her son’s stomach: “This is for Islam.”
Will we ever learn their motive?
One of the other jihadis who attacked London with two co-religionists
before being shot dead by police deceived his neighbors into thinking
he was a great guy, a good neighbor. He played football with their
children on the nearby field. Secretly, he had a devout, destructive
hatred, and he frequently changed his appearance in preparation of
unleashing a deadly Islamic attack on the capital city, during which
seven people died and up to 50 were injured last night. How many other
“moderates” are in our midst? More than you can imagine. Prime Minister Theresa May and every major media news outlet insists
jihadis have “perverted” and/or “hijacked” Islam? How have they
perverted it? They cite Quranic texts and teachings chapter and verse. They follow the hadith, Muhammad’s example.
Harun Khan, who leads the Muslim Council of Britain, said, “I am
appalled and angered by the terrorist attacks at London Bridge and
borough market, in my home city. These acts of violence were truly
shocking and I condemn them in the strongest terms.” Is that so. What
have Khan and his coreligionists who allege that this is a
misunderstanding of Islam done to combat it? There is, for example, not a
single program in any mosque or Islamic school in the UK (or the UK) to
teach young Muslims to reject the Islamic State’s understanding of
Islam. With the Islamic State energetically recruiting young Muslims in
the US, that is a significant omission.
The Sun says that Ramadan is meant for devotion and peace. Since when? As Robert Spencer has noted: “A jihad group explained it
back in 2012: ‘The month of Ramadan is a month of holy war and death
for Allah. It is a month for fighting the enemies of Allah and God’s
messenger, the Jews and their American facilitators.’ Referring to a
jihad attack that happened at that time, the message continued: ‘One of
our groups aided by Allah managed to bomb a bus full of Jewish tourists,
plunderers of holy lands, after careful tracking. The holy war is not
confined to a particular arena and we shall fight the Jews and the
Americans until they leave the land of Islam.’” All this dawah and whitewashing makes one thing clear.Terrorism works.
In the wake of every jihad attack come sharia-backed policies,
legislation, and submission. Freedom of speech is not the problem. Free
exchange of ideas is not the problem. Islamic texts and teachings that
exhort to jihad is the problem.
Yet Theresa May says the internet must now be regulated following the
London Bridge terror attack. Of course, good folks will say, well, that
makes sense, because they don’t know better. But let me assure you,
these measures will be used to silence my colleagues and me. The left
has already proved to be too fearful of Islam to take real action
against jihadis. And if my colleagues and I were not blacklisted and
invited to debate these ideas in the national conversation, good people
would see this for exactly what it is.
The West means to roll back technology, silence the mechanism, in
which those religious teachings are shared? That is a primitive as jihad
savagery.
As long as Quranic texts and teachings are seen as legitimate and
holy, Muslims will share them, preach them, and act on them with or
without the internet. What is May going to do, ban WhatsApp and
Telegram, the dark web? She banned my colleagues and me, not jihad
preachers or these Muslim terrorists who slaughtered Brits in the
homeland. She equates those of us who oppose jihad (extremists) to the
jihadis (extremists). If Theresa May were serious, she would lift the
ban on Robert Spencer and me.
Like every bad left-wing idea, this steaming pile of dung is packaged
in a blue Tiffany box. Remember how they sold “hate crime”
“legislation” using the brutal beating of a gay man, Matthew Shepard
(when actually it was just a drug deal gone bad). Hate crime legislation was officially criminalizing thought. Thought crime.
The internet is the last place for informed citizens to get news and
information the sharia-compliant elite media won’t cover. Online is the
last frontier for truth and free speech, and the left is going after
that as well, enforcing the blasphemy laws under the sharia. Facebook
has blocked my content from close one million followers.
If Theresa May wants to turn things around, the first thing she can
do is lift the ban on Spencer and me — if for no other reason than to
show that she finally understands that the problem is not those who
oppose jihad, but jihad.
Instead, the dawah and whitewashing will continue.
________________________________________________________
Italy: Fear of jihad terror attack sets off stampede, 1500 injured
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
“I will cast terror into the hearts of those who
disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every
fingertip of them.” — Quran 8:12
With the ever-increasing number of jihad attacks in the Western
countries, terror is being struck into the hearts of their citizens. The
days of expecting peace and protection in a democratic society are
over. The Western world is in turmoil, thanks to jihadists and leaders
who strangely keep getting voted in while sacrificing the safety of
their own jurisdictions and countries for political expediency. The Telegraph was a little more descriptive about what happened:
The Turin prefect said in a statement that the crowd “was
taken by panic and by the psychosis of a terror attack,” fearing that a
loud noise was caused by attackers. The source of the loud noise that
triggered the stampede remained unclear, officials said. Italian media
has speculated it may have been a firecracker.
“Turin stampede: ‘1,500 injured’ at Juventus screening”, BBC News, June 4, 2017:
About 1,500 people were injured in the Italian city of
Turin after a firecracker provoked a stampede on Saturday night, police
say.
Thousands of football fans were watching a live relay of Juventus’
Champions League final against Real Madrid in Cardiff when a bang was
heard and rumours of an explosion spread.
At least seven people, including a seven-year-old child, were seriously hurt, local media say.
It is the 12th Champions League title for Real Madrid.
With 10 minutes of the second half remaining, crowds rushed away from
the centre of Piazza San Carlo, crushing people against barriers.
Bags and shoes were left scattered on the ground as people ran screaming out of the square.
Some of the injuries occurred when a barrier around the entrance to an underground car park gave way.
While most of the wounded had cuts on their legs and arms, seven were still in hospital, local media reported.
Three of them were reportedly in a critical condition, including a
seven-year-old boy who had head and chest injuries after he was trampled
by people rushing to escape.
There was anger locally that the authorities did not do more to put
in place proper crowd control measures, the BBC’s James Reynolds in Rome
reports….
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
Theresa May says she wants governments to unite to combat online
“extremism.” But since she clearly regards critics of Sharia as
extremists (as she showed by banning Pamela Geller and me from the
country), it’s obvious that critics of Sharia will be censored as well.
The superb David Wood discusses this in this new video.
"RAMADAN'S PEACE, LOVE & TEDDY BEARS":
Not Internet Control, But Border Control &
Armed Citizens to Fight Jihad
Published on Jun 6, 2017
London
Mayor Khan thinks the greatest problem before us is “Climate Change”.
UK Prime Minister Theresa May sees a jihadi problem, but her solution is
internet control. We look at the real solutions — border control &
an armed citizenry — and how technology will defeat political attacks
on free speech.
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
The number of parents questioning the wisdom of the currently recommended schedule is up and corroboration is easy to find.1 An article in the journal Pediatrics in August 2016 reported that the number of pediatricians encountering parents who either question vaccine safety or refuse one or more vaccines or want to use an alternative vaccination schedule for their children increased from just under 75 percent in 2006 to 87 percent by 2013.2
A study from the Journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics3 reported that the primary reasons given for vaccine hesitancy or refusal of one or more recommended vaccinations include
concern over pain associated with multiple injections (44 percent); too
many vaccines given at one time (34 percent); the possibility of
vaccines causing autism or other learning disabilities (26 percent, down
from the 2006 survey); concern that there is an association between
vaccines and chronic illnesses (13.5 percent); and lack of adequate
safety studies (13.2 percent). Some parents also are questioning whether so many childhood vaccines
are necessary (up from the 2006 survey), and whether experience with
natural disease is better for children than repeated artificial
manipulation of the immune system by vaccinations.
Overall, fewer parents are focused specifically on fears of autism
compared with a few years ago. Instead, parents are expressing broader
concerns such as the potential effects on immune system function,
worries over how the injection of so many toxins may affect their
child’s well-being long term, lack of adequate vaccine safety studies,
and protection of parental rights to make informed medical decisions for
their children.4
The general consensus that vaccine hesitancy is on the rise has spawned a host articles in the medical literature and in the media about how
to “fix the problem.” Many doctors and and health care professionals
have serious questions themselves and agree that vaccine decisions
should be left to parents, but a far more common position holds that
parents should not have the final say on vaccine decisions and that it
is a societal obligation for doctors to change the mind of anyone who
disagrees with current vaccine recommendations. A quick Google search of
“vaccine hesitancy” turns up mountains of advice on how to persuade
so-called “misinformed” or “confused” parents to change their minds and
get with the program.
From tired old references to the “debunked” notion that vaccines
cause autism to condescending suggestions for educating, incentivizing
or coercing reluctant patients or parents to accept all recommended
vaccines, it can be intimidating to even admit to having questions about
vaccination. It may help to know what to expect and to recognize
pressure strategies that may be used.
Categorizing the Vaccine Hesitant
One of the first things recommended for doctors faced with vaccine
hesitant parents (a term reportedly coined to “depolarize the ‘pro’
versus ‘anti’ vaccination alignment and to express the spectrum of
parental attitudes toward vaccines5)
is to categorize the parents by degree of and reasons for reluctance,
in order to determine the best strategy for changing hesitancy to
compliance.
Scott Halperin, MD, is credited with identifying the “five types of
vaccine-hesitant parents,” classified as follows in a blog post for
“National Immunization Awareness Month”6:
“Uninformed But Want To Become Informed” parents
are defined as those who turn to their trusted physician because of his
or her expertise and want to be reassured and educated about the safety
and effectiveness of vaccines. It is suggested that these parents can be
educated about the science in simple terms without using too much
jargon, and that sharing personal experiences—such as the fact that the
physician’s own children are fully vaccinated—may help.
“Misinformed But Correctable” describes parents
considered to have been fooled by exploitative, anonymous online
reporting that plays into their worst fears, despite the “strength of
the evidence that vaccines are safe and effective.” For these parents,
it is suggested that sound data de-bunking the myths they’ve bought into
should do the trick. It is also said to be important to both
acknowledge the risks and limitations of vaccines and to respect their
parental authority… but to very clearly stress the “strong benefits of
vaccines.”
“Well-Read and Open-Minded” parents are described
as having absorbed so much information on both sides of the issue that
they come to their physician with many questions and concerns. These
parents require help in evaluating the information they have heard. It
is recommended that the doctor have sound data and appropriate websites
to refer them to, in order to refute any “misinformation” they have
received. A reassuring follow-up phone call is also said to be helpful.
“Convinced and Content” parents are categorized as
those who are “convinced vaccines are bad, but come to [their physician]
to prove they are open-minded.” The strategy to deal with such parents
is described as “acknowledging their concerns but strongly refuting them
with scientific data.”
“Committed and Missionary” is the final category
identified for vaccine questioners. These people are said to be
“card-carrying anti-vaccine activists who try and convert you to their
position.” Some of the suggestions for dealing with such parents include
stressing the positive effects of vaccines, and making sure they
understand the responsibilities and risks they are accepting if they
choose not to vaccinate. Physicians are encouraged to “Be patient, as
correcting anti-vaccine myths and changing parent attitudes does not
happen overnight.”
Going Beyond Official Policy Education
If gentle persuasion and carefully scripted education are not enough
to convince parents to fully vaccinate their children, other means of
doing so have been identified by some doctors.
One ploy is referred to as “presumptive delivery,” in which the
physician begins by presenting vaccination as a requirement to prevent
disease rather than as an optional course of action.7
Similarly, a “strategy of inconvenience” is alleged to be pretty
effective. For example, when a step was added requiring Michigan parents
seeking a vaccine exemption to meet in person with a “county health
educator” before being granted the exemption, the number of requests
dropped by 35 percent in one year, and vaccination rates rose. Health
policy specialist Mark Largent said the idea was to make the “process
more burdensome,” adding that, “Moral claims and ideology don’t matter
as much when it’s inconvenient.”8
Appealing to a parent’s sense of societal obligation is another
tactic used frequently. Pediatrician Richard Lander, MD expressed a
common opinion when he said that it is important to help “people view
vaccines as protecting overall community health, similar to the way
other laws are designed to protect community health.”9
Dr. Lander further suggested that “If a parent decides not to give
vaccines, perhaps the insurance companies should charge them higher
premiums since their risk of preventable infections is higher; and maybe
if someone contracts a preventable illness from their child, the
parents should be financially responsible for the health care costs
involved. This would place more responsibility upon those parents and
really alert them to how their decision doesn’t only affect their
child.”9
Guilt and fear tactics are also said to be effective, as when a
physician asks, “Do you really want your child to have to suffer through
a disease you either had as a child or never had to have yourself?” or
plays up the risks of “vaccine preventable diseases” with photographs
and horror stories of children who became very ill or died from one of
those diseases. Some physicians resort to denying
medical care to children if parents refuse to give their children all
federally recommended vaccines according to the CDC’s recommended
schedule.
If all else fails, offering candy is a suggested bribe for convincing
the truly intractable. No joke. Health officials in Ireland suggest
that uptake of the flu vaccine can be increased substantially among
nurses by offering chocolate or drawings for iPads to nurses who agree
to be vaccinated.10
Although the comments were roundly criticized for being patronizing and
condescending, they offer a telling glimpse into the way people who question the safety of vaccines are viewed by public health officials and the mainstream medical community. References:
Be
prepared. The radical, fear-mongering pro-vaxers who want to give big
daddy government the right to your health care choices and freedom use
some common debate tactics. Be aware. Be prepared.
One
day, should the Lord tarry and man does not fully revert to the Dark
Ages, mankind will one day look back at the vaccination agenda of our
age as we look back at blood-letting. A day when doctors will understand
that vaccination is based on agenda-driven speculation, opinion, grand
assumptions, and lies repeated and repeated until they become truth in
the ears of those conditioned not to question the voices of authority of
our "civilized" control system, NOT real science.
Dr. Humphries
gives a pretty good overview of several of the real, and
scientifically-demonstrable problems with vaccinations. Judge for
yourself. But you owe it to you and your kids to make an INFORMED
choice. There is one side that tries to shame and coerce your choice in
this very important matter. That vaccines are being MANDATED should tell
any thoughtful soul how (un)effective they are.
Nurse Fired For Sharing Truth About Vaccines Tells All
Mainstream Media Funded By Drug Companies
Pushing Poison On America
Published on Jun 5, 2017
Alex Jones breaks down how the mainstream media funds itself by pushing dangerous pharmaceuticals on the American public.
