THE CHURCH MILITANT
Ephesians 5:11-"And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather expose them". This Christian News Blog maintains a one stop resource of current news and reports of its own related to church, moral, spiritual, and related political issues, plus articles, and postings from other online discernment ministries, and media which share the aims to obey the biblical commands to shed light on and refute error, heresy, apostasy, cults, and spiritual abuse.
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
One of the prevailing heresies growing in the modern visible church
is the Word of Faith movement. It is a movement that grew out of the
charismatic sect of Pentecostalism and teaches that Apostolic sign gifts
of the early church, such as tongues, prophecy, and healings, have not
ceased. One of the practices in this movement is the exorcism of demons.
At a Word of Faith church in Spindale, North Carolina, a homosexual
man had his demons expelled by 30 members of his congregation. He was
actually beaten and assaulted by these people. According to an article in the Daily Mail one
member of the church testified in court that the man was slapped,
beaten, and choked for nearly two hours by the members of this crazed
cult.
The article reports,
As part of an ongoing, two-year
investigation into abuse of Word of Faith Fellowship congregants by
church leaders, The Associated Press interviewed four former church
members who say they witnessed Fenner being attacked.
Based on interviews with 43 former
members, documents and secretly made recordings, it was reported in
February that Word of Faith Fellowship congregants were regularly
punched, smacked, choked, slammed to the floor or thrown through walls
in a violent form of deliverance meant to ‘purify’ sinners by beating
out devils.
The church’s website is here,
where the home page doesn’t feature information about the church’s
location, a statement of faith, or any of the expected information from a
church’s website, but features a series videos defending its
questionable actions over the years and calling out a former member of
the church who has broken away from the cult and has been dedicated to
exposing them for their actions.
This is the fruit of the false doctrine and false gospel of the Word of Faith church.
__________________________________________________________
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
Uploaded on Apr 18, 2009
A
CALL FOR DISCERNMENT DVD: a Fair Biblical Critique of the Word of Faith
Prosperity gospel. SO4J-TV www.SO4J.com worked w/Justin Peters
Ministries www.JustinPeters.org to Produce an Updated 2010-2011 DVD of
Justin's Excellent & Informative 6 Hour Seminar (3 Sessions) on 2
DVDs. JUSTIN PETERS teaches his eye opening Seminar around the World
that Exposes the Deceptions of the Health & Wealth Prosperity
gospel. Word of Faith Theology dominates Christian Satellite & Cable
TV.
INSIDE THESE 2 DVDs:
This 2010 6 Hour Seminar on 2
DVDs include a lot of Video & Audio Clips of various Word of Faith
Leaders such as: Benny Hinn, Joel Osteen, Kenneth & Gloria Copeland,
Jessie Duplantis, Joyce Meyer, Kenneth Hagin, Creflo Dollar, Paula
White, Larry Huch, Myles Munroe, Jan & Paul Crouch, Fredrick Price,
Mike Murdock, John Crowder, John Hagee, Sid Roth, Rod Parsley, Paul
& Jan Crouch, etc.
This DVD allows people to See and Hear for
themselves what these individuals are actually Teaching, along with the
many False Prophecies that have been spoken and Not come True.
Everything is then balanced with Scripture as there is Biblical
Commentary, and Scriptures to help the viewer Examine Everything with
the Word of God (Acts 17:11, 1 John 4:1, 1 Thess 5:21).
• Justin's Testimony: his Cerebral Palsy & Nora Lam
• The Duty of Discernment
• Definition of Discernment
• Bereans: Search the Scriptures - Acts 17:11
• Why do we need Discernment?
• Answering the Critics
SESSION 1: DANGEROUS DOCTRINES
• History: Word Faith / Metaphysical Cultic Origins
• Phineas P. Quimby
• Essek W. Kenyon
• William Branham
• Kenneth Hagin, Sr.
• Word of Faith Doctrines
• Positive Confession
• Little gods Doctrine
• The Fall
• Jesus Christ - Just a man?
• Spiritual Death of Jesus
• Jesus Made Sin?
SESSION 2: MANGLED MANIFESTATIONS
• Abuse of Tongues
• Spectacular Claims
• Heavenly Encounters
• Bizarre Behavior
• Slaying in the Spirit
• Divine Revelation Knowledge
• Occultic / Demonic
• False Prophets
SESSION 3: THE HURT OF HEALING
• Points to Ponder
• Healing - Is it Always God's Will?
• Is Healing in the Atonement?
• The Biblical Record
• Requirement for Healing
• A Sense of Expectation
• Money
• Right Heart & Perseverance
• Hindrances to Healing
• Lack of Faith
• Not Saved?
• Gospel of Jesus Christ
This
6 Hour Seminar has all New Footage of Justin Peters. It includes the
same great Material in his previous DVD's— but better Quality, more
Clips, and it fits now on 2 DVDs vs 3. It also has a large DVD Menu that
is easier to navigate around than the past DVD's.
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
The establishment Swamp of globalists, tax-funded climate alarmists,
socialists, and others erupted into a frenzy of unhinged outrage and
apoplectic fury after President Donald Trump announced the U.S. withdrawal from the illegal and unratified United Nations Paris Agreement on “climate change.”
Some of the most unhinged voices claimed Trump's move would destroy the
planet and was tantamount to a war on America or humanity. From Obama
and foreign rulers to crony capitalists and UN bureaucrats, the seething
anger is clearly intense. And a full day after the president announced
his historic decision to
reclaim U.S. sovereignty, protect the Constitution, unlock domestic
energy supplies, and reinvigorate America's economy, the Swamp's
hysterical panic is still growing more extreme.
It is easy to see why the Swamp is losing its collective marbles over
Trump's decision. Even after the globalist establishment and its
institutions, including the pseudo-“mainstream” media, put all their
combined credibility on the line, most Americans still do not even believe in their discredited global-warming theory
— much less in the totalitarian, anti-American pseudo-solutions. And
that means the jig may well be up for their deception. Indeed, if the
climate “hoax,” as Trump has called it, finally collapses completely, it
may be close to impossible for the establishment and its propaganda
organs to be taken seriously by the public again for the foreseeable
future. And so, the Swamp is metaphorically doubling down on a
metaphorical busted flush.
Of course, among reputable scientists, Republicans, taxpayers,
workers, climate realists, patriots, constitutionalists, conservatives,
libertarians, and everyday Americans concerned with jobs and rising
prices, Trump's historic decision was greeted with widespread
celebration. As the full impact of the move begins to sink in, that will
undoubtedly grow. Trump supporters have been busy ridiculing alarmists
and their attacks on the president. And fortunately for Americans and
humanity, some foreign governments wedded to the man-made global-warming
theory (or at least the totalitarian policies underpinned by it) vowed
not to renegotiate the UN “climate” regime in response to the U.S.
withdrawal. As Trump put it in his speech announcing the decision,
“that's fine.”
But for the Swamp, it is now a no-holds barred fight. Consider Obama,
whose administration was largely responsible for the pseudo-treaty.
Sounding like a petulant child despite being warned repeatedly that his
illegal climate schemes would not stand, the former president lashed out
at Trump with blatant falsehoods. “The nations [governments and
tyrants] that remain in the Paris agreement will be the nations that
reap the benefits in jobs and industries created,” he claimed, as if
jobs and “industries” reliant on taxpayer support to exist were
desirable or productive. Of course, without the U.S. tax money for the
Green Climate (slush) Fund, the UN scheme is practically dead already
anyway, as multiple governments and regimes made clear at the UN summit.
Obama also tried to put a smiley face on it all, suggesting some
state and local governments would be willing to cripple their own
economies and impoverish their own constituents to prop up his UN
scheme. “Even in the absence of American leadership; even as this
administration joins a small handful of nations that reject the future;
I’m confident that our states, cities, and businesses will step up and
do even more to lead the way, and help protect for future generations
the one planet we’ve got,” Obama claimed, sounding delusional to more
sober-minded analysts. A handful of fringe left-wing politicians at the
state and local level did claim they would stand by the UN scheme, but
if they do, the jurisdictions they rule will suffer tremendously as
businesses and taxpayers flee to friendlier regions.
The Soros-funded AstroTurf movement created by Obama, Organizing for
Action (OFA), was even more unhinged. In a mass e-mail to the group
signed by former Obama White House Communications Director Jen Psaki,
the organization claimed Trump's decision was “devastating.” She
pretended, first of all, that Obama's unconstitutional promises to the
UN and its member regimes — promises that were never ratified by the
Senate, approved by Congress, or authorized by the Constitution — needed
to be kept. In reality, Obama never had any authority to make such
promises to begin with, and adhering to them would have only compounded
the error. Still, Psaki and OFA promised that the “fight isn't over
yet.”
“Any way you slice it, pulling out of Paris is the wrong move,” Psaki
continued for OFA, claiming it was bad for jobs, the climate, health,
safety, air, national security, water, the U.S. “relationship” with the
world, children, and so on. “Thanks to Paris, united worldwide progress
on climate change isn't theoretical anymore. Nearly every other country
in the world is formally on board, with plans to make serious cuts in
carbon pollution in the coming decades.” Even Big Business and Big Oil
supported the scheme, the OFA activist said after years of falsely
claiming opposition to their scheming was coming from oil companies.
But there were many lies and deceptions in the screed that were
largely representative of the broader Swamp's reaction. Of course, as
all scientists know, CO2 is not “pollution,” it is the “gas of life,” and
no matter how many times Swamp creatures and the increasingly
irrelevant media repeat the lie, it will still be a lie. The fact that
Third World dictators signed up to a scheme under which they would do
nothing except keep their victims in poverty and collect welfare checks
from U.S. taxpayers, meanwhile, is hardly impressive — regardless of
whether Psaki and other alarmists dishonestly conflate those tyrants
with the countries they oppress.
Indeed, most of the establishment's propaganda organs joined in the
dishonesty, labeling as “pollution” the essential-to-life gas CO2 —
literally exhaled by every person on earth in every breath. The press,
ranging from the New York Times and the Washington Post
to CNN and the networks, claimed other “countries” were upset about
Trump's decision. In reality, the regimes ruling over those countries —
many of them brutal totalitarians and mass murderers — were simply upset
that the stream of U.S. tax funding to their corrupt governments was
set to dry up. To claim that “countries” signed up is absurd.
Unsurprisingly, Al Gore, the discredited climate profiteer whose prophecies of doom
have repeatedly proven to be completely wrong, was also apoplectic at
the news of Trump's decision. “Removing the United States from the Paris
agreement is a reckless and indefensible action,” fumed the former vice
president, widely ridiculed as a key “cult” leader for his role pushing
the climate alarmism despite the growing amounts of evidence
discrediting it. “It undermines America’s standing in the world and
threatens to damage humanity’s ability to solve the climate crisis in
time.”
Former Secretary of State John Kerry was even more unhinged, claiming
Trump's decision “may be the most self-defeating action in American
history” and “one of the most shameful any president has made.” “Those
of us who have spent a lifetime fighting on this issue know that America
pulling out of Paris will not only result in lost leadership, it will
also result in lost momentum,” he warned, perhaps forgetting that, until
the early 1980s, the supposed “issue” was alleged man-made global
cooling that was set to start a new ice age, even according to Obama
Science Czar John Holdren.
Kerry, sounding like a false prophet of doom standing on the corner
with a sign warning of that the “End is Near,” also warned that if
humanity does not do what he said, terrible apocalyptic scenarios await.
Among the disasters Kerry listed that will afflict humanity if it
refuses to repent of its carbon emission sins: “stronger storms, longer
and more intense droughts, more wildfires, more strains on agriculture
and fishing, a swell of climate refugees, and, as military brass has
been warning for years, intensified conflict around the world.” Similar
predictions have been made for generations, and they have consistently
been proven completely wrong.
Big Business, Big Oil, and crony capitalists feeding at the taxpayer
trough such as Elon Musk, a self-styled “entrepreneur” whose business
models always depend on tax money, also expressed fury. Musk even put
out a note on social media saying “climate change is real” and vowing to
withdraw from a few symbolic presidential councils he had been put on.
In response, he was widely ridiculed, including by U.S. Senators, for
his phony outrage and his use of a CO2-spewing private jet. Indeed, it
has been reported that he uses his luxurious private jet to fly to
Washington to lobby for even more of your tax money to support his crony
companies.
Perhaps the most unhinged reaction of all — and that is saying something —
came from billionaire crony capitalist Tom Steyer, who stood to make
big profits from his investments in tax-funded “green” schemes in
addition to his coal investments overseas. He was quoted in media
reports saying Trump was “committing a traitorous act of war against the
American people.” Of course, the majority of the American people do not
even believe in the discredited man-made warming theory, much less in
the draconian pseudo-solutions demanded by the UN and its largely
autocratic membership roster. So, in reality, Trump is simply obeying
the Constitution and doing what he promised voters by canceling the
illegal UN scheme.
In the days and weeks ahead, Americans and Trump will continue to be
subjected to a barrage of unhinged hate and dishonest propaganda from
the Swamp and its increasingly fringe media organs. However, many years
of that propaganda were unable to convince enough American voters to
fall for the scam, as evidenced by Trump's election on a platform of
canceling the UN scheme. In response to the growing stream of fake news
and the constant attacks from the establishment, Americans should
redouble their efforts to expose the climate scam and oppose the UN's
globalist agenda.
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
IOWA CITY, Iowa — The Iowa Supreme Court
has ruled that a mother may sue her OB/GYN and radiologist for “wrongful
birth” after they failed to tell her that her child had birth defects
so that she might be able to obtain an abortion.
“The right to sue for wrongful birth belongs to parents who
were denied the opportunity to make an informed choice whether to
lawfully terminate a pregnancy in Iowa,” wrote
Justice Thomas Waterman in the 6-1 decision. “It is not this court’s
role to second-guess that intensely personal and difficult decision.”
“Parents of children with disabilities may find their lives
enriched by the challenges and joys they confront daily. But under our
tort law, financial compensation should be paid by the negligent
physician if liability is proven,” he added.
According to reports, Jeremy and Pamela Plowman—now
divorced—sued Fort Madison Community Hospital and several of its medical
providers after their son was born in 2011 with cerebral palsy,
microcephaly and a small corpus callosum, resulting in intellectual
disability, cortical visual impairment and seizure disorder.
The conditions were not diagnosed until the child was at
least four month old after the mother became concerned that her son
might have developmental disabilities and was directed to a specialist.
Doctors now say the boy might never walk or speak.
The parents asserted in their complaint that when Plowman
went for an ultrasound in her 22nd week (between five and six months),
she was told by her OB/GYN that “everything was fine,” as the
radiologist did not report that microcephaly—an abnormally small head
circumference—had actually been detected. The radiologist rather
reported the circumference as being “within two standard deviations of
normal.”
The Plowmans consequently sued over the alleged failure to
properly interpret, diagnose and communicate their child’s abnormalities
as shown by the ultrasound. While the mother testified that she “really
enjoy[s] spending time with [her son] and get[s] a lot of happiness
from him,” the couple’s lawsuit also noted that she “would
have terminated her pregnancy” had she known of her son’s conditions.
The suit seeks damages for mental anguish, cost of care
past, present and future, and the loss of income after the mother needed
to quit her job to take care of her son—now almost six years old.
The Iowa Supreme Court, in issuing its decision, noted that
23 other states allow for wrongful birth suits, and that Roe v. Wade
permits mothers to obtain an abortion before the point of viability
(when current technology has the capability to keep the child alive
separated from the mother’s womb).
“Defendants argue the disabled child may later be
emotionally traumatized upon learning his or her parents would have
chosen to abort. But given Z.P.’s severe cognitive disabilities,
there is nothing in the record to indicate he will someday understand
his parents sued over their lost opportunity to avoid his birth,” the
court also wrote.
The lone dissenting justice, Edward Mansfield, opined that
the Plowmans should not have been allowed to sue because wrongful birth
suits over abnormalities could lead to a “slippery slope” that could
include any medical condition.
“True, today’s decision is limited to a ‘severely disabled
child.’ But the court does not define the term,” he wrote. “What if
testing indicates the child will be born blind or without a hand? Is
that enough?”
“The court’s decision also opens up the possibility for
other claims. Can a mother sue a father for not telling her that he
carried a genetic disorder, on the theory that she would otherwise have
had an abortion?” Mansfield asked. “Can a father sue a mother for not
telling him she carried a genetic disorder, on the theory that he would
not have had unprotected sex? Can a couple that relies on an outside
sperm donor sue the source of that donation in tort?”
President
Trump dumped the climate change scam known as the Paris Accord, or the
Paris Climate Agreement. “I was elected to represent the citizens of
Pittsburgh, not Paris,” he said. Liberals are crying and screaming,
creating multiple hashtags, and blaming Trump for ending the human race.
MACRON INVITES AMERICANS TO COME TO FRANCE TO WORK ON CLIMATE
Macron SLAMS Trump for WITHDRAWAL of Paris Climate Accord Agreement 6/1/2017 its NOT RENEGOTIABLE
Trump Drives Stake Through Globalism's Heart
Climate Agreement Is A Glorified Global Tax Published on Jun 2, 2017 Alex
Jones breaks down how the Paris Climate Accord was nothing more than a
way for the globalists to establish a global tax to fund their global
government.
Trump Says No To Climate Profiteers Of Doom
Published on Jun 1, 2017
Here
we are in the final showdown over the Paris Climate Agreement. Tread
carefully…..propaganda filled waters ahead.... Don’t believe the hype.
The
National Review reported way back in April of 2016 "Unsurprisingly, the
sum of many pledges to do nothing is: nothing. When the Massachusetts
Institute of Technology compiled the pledges and compared them with its
own preexisting projection, it found a temperature reduction by 2100 of
only 0.2°C. When the analysts compared the pledges with the projection
created by the U.N.’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change back in
2000, they found no improvement at all. While everyone else both
literally and figuratively mailed in their commitments, the president
pledged a dramatic reduction in U.S. emissions: 26 to 28 percent below
their 2005 level by 2025. To further grease the skids of international
diplomacy, he committed the United States to lead the transfer of $100
billion in annual “climate finance” from the developed world to the
developing countries that are pledging nothing.”
Trump Decapitates World Government,
Bilderberg Prepares To Strike Back
Published on Jun 1, 2017
Alex Jones breaks down the meeting of global elites at Bilderberg as President Trump prepares to exit the Paris Climate Treaty.
PARIS TREATY: Trump Slaps Antichrist & False Prophet
Published on Jun 1, 2017
www.DarylLawsonLive.com
Paris climate accord is a largely symbolic gesture that even supporters
acknowledge lacks enforcement mechanisms and, even if successful, will
have a statistically insignificant impact on the climate.
Reuters
reports that U.S. carbon emissions will fall over the next decade —
regardless of whether America remains in COP21 treaty. https://news.grabien.com/story-10-dum...
Vatican would see U.S. Paris deal exit as slap in face - official
VATICAN
CITY (Reuters) - The Vatican, which under Pope Francis' insistence has
strongly backed the Paris climate change deal, would see a U.S. exit as a
slap in the face and a "disaster for everyone," a senior official said
on Thursday.
At their meeting last month, the pope gave U.S.
President Donald Trump a signed copy of his 2015 encyclical letter that
called for protecting the environment from the effects of climate change
and backed scientific evidence that it is caused by human activity.
Vatican Secretary of State Cardinal Pietro Parolin urged Trump in a separate meeting not to quit the Paris accord.
"If
he really does (pull out), it would be a huge slap in the face for us,"
said Bishop Marcelo Sanchez Sorondo, head of the Pontifical Academy of
Sciences, which has hosted numerous international conferences on climate
change.
"It will be a disaster for everyone," he told the Rome
newspaper La Repubblica. In a telephone call with Reuters, Sanchez
Sorondo confirmed the comments in the newspaper.
Trump was due to
announce his decision later on Thursday. A source briefed on the
decision has told Reuters in Washington that he will follow through on
his campaign pledge to pull the United States out of the global
agreement.
A withdrawal "would not only be a disaster but
completely unscientific," he said. "Saying that we need to rely on coal
and oil is like saying that the earth is not round. It is an absurdity
dictated by the need to make money."
Trump has called the idea of global warming a hoax.
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
After months of keeping the world in suspense about his intentions, President Donald Trump formally announced that the United States would be withdrawing from the United Nations “Paris Agreement”
on alleged man-made global warming. Blasting the non-binding UN scheme
as a counterproductive effort to disadvantage America and redistribute
U.S. wealth rather than fix the “climate,” Trump portrayed the decision
as one that puts “America First.” He also chastised foreign powers and
their lobbyists for demanding that the United States continue to
handicap its economy under the guise of doing virtually nothing for the
climate. The withdrawal, Trump said, represents the “re-assertion of
America's sovereignty” and a fulfillment of his efforts to re-invigorate
the American economy. It was also the fulfillment of Trump's
oft-repeated pledge to “cancel” the UN scheme.
However, frustrating some of his supporters and climate realists,
Trump also indicated that he was open to either re-negotiating the Paris
Agreement or creating a similar international “climate” regime that
would be more “fair” to the United States. In fact, the president even
offered to work with Democrat Party leaders to create a new
global-warming scheme — provided it was more fair and did not impose
undue burdens on the United States that did not apply equally to other
nations, including the world's top polluters. Some Trump supporters,
though, suggested that the president understands such a “far better”
so-called “climate” regime will never materialize. Plus, even if it did,
it would stand virtually no chance of being ratified by the Senate, as
required by the Constitution — especially since most Americans reject the warming theory to begin with. If no new deal emerges, “that's fine,” Trump said.
Trump's speech, though, was widely celebrated as wonderful by his
supporters and especially his core base. Despite softening his rhetoric
on the man-made global-warming theory, which he repeatedly referred to
as a “hoax” over a period of years, Trump's historic announcement
pleased a broad array of his supporters on main street. From supporting
workers and domestic energy production to defending the U.S.
Constitution and American sovereignty, Trump's speech hit multiple
points that American patriots have been longing to hear from a U.S.
president for decades. Indeed, the decision itself was a stunning blow
to globalist-swamp schemers, “climate” AstroTurf activists,
mega-bankers, UN bureaucrats, Third World dictators, Big Oil, crony
capitalists, the pope and the full spectrum of forces lobbying Trump to
stay in the imploding UN scheme.
The UN “Paris Agreement,” as the pseudo-treaty is called, was
negotiated in Paris, France, in December of 2015 by Obama, the UN, and
the UN's largely autocratic and corrupt member regimes. Under the
scheme, Obama purported to commit the United States to draconian
economic and energy restrictions, all while pledging to redistribute
hundreds of billions of taxpayer money from the middle class in West to
Third World regimes and the UN. Because Obama knew it would stand no
chance of being ratified by the U.S. Senate as required by the U.S.
Constitution, the administration called it an “executive agreement” and
claimed ratification was not needed. But as this magazine warned at the
time, such a plot meant the foundation of the pseudo-treaty was built on
quicksand, all but ensuring its eventual collapse. Indeed, without U.S.
participation and tax money, the scheme is essentially dead.
Trump offered many reasons for his decision. He praised the U.S.
Constitution, saying it was his “highest honor” to protect it, and that
he always would do so. And in an exceedingly rare development for U.S.
presidents of recent memory, Trump also touted and defended U.S.
sovereignty. "There are serious legal and constitutional issues as
well," Trump said. "Foreign leaders in Europe, Asia and across the world
should not have more to say with respect to the U.S. economy than our
own citizens and their elected representatives. Thus, our withdrawal
from the agreement represents a reassertion of America's
sovereignty." Perhaps most stunning was the sharp rebuke he gave of the
Paris Agreement itself, which he described as essentially a giant scam
to rip off the American people to benefit foreign powers and special
interests.
“The Paris climate accord is simply the latest example of Washington
entering into an agreement that disadvantages the United States, to the
exclusive benefit of other countries, leaving American workers, who I
love, and taxpayers to absorb the cost in terms of lost jobs, lower
wages, shuttered factories and vastly diminished economic production,”
Trump correctly explained. “Thus, as of today, the United States will
cease all implementation of the nonbinding Paris accord and the
draconian financial and economic burdens the agreement imposes on our
country. This includes ending the implementation of the nationally
determined contribution and, very importantly, the Green Climate Fund,
which is costing the United States a vast fortune.”
Trump also broke down the numbers. Among other facts and figures, the
president said compliance with the UN scheme and the “onerous energy
restrictions it has placed on the United States” could cost America some
2.7 million lost jobs by 2025, including almost half of a million
manufacturing jobs. Citing the National Economic Research Associates,
Trump said that by 2040, compliance with the UN scheme would slash paper
production by 12 percent, cement by one fourth, iron and steel by 38
percent, coal down by 86 percent, and natural gas down by almost a
third. “The cost to the economy at this time would be close to $3
trillion in lost GDP and 6.5 million industrial jobs, while households
would have $7,000 less income, and in many cases, much worse than that,”
Trump added, saying that was unacceptable.
On top of those devastating figures, Trump noted, the “climate”
scheme would do virtually nothing for the climate. “Even if the Paris
Agreement were implemented in full, with total compliance from all
nations it is estimated it would only produce a two tenths of one degree
— think of that, this much — Celsius reduction in global temperature by
the year 2100,” Trump said, calling it a “tiny, tiny” amount while
vowing that the United States would continue to be the cleanest country
on Earth. “In fact, 14 days of carbon emissions from China alone would
wipe out the gains from America and this is an incredible statistic —
would totally wipe out the gains from America's expected reductions in
the year 2030. After we have had to spend billions and billions of
dollars, lost jobs, closed factories and suffered much higher energy
costs for our businesses and for our homes.”
Others who have examined the numbers and the data came to similar
conclusions. Indeed, the UN's own numbers also confirm that the scheme
has little to do with “climate.” Danish statistician Dr. Bjorn Lomborg,
the president of the Copenhagen Consensus Center, for example, crunched
the numbers using the UN's own “climate” models. What he found makes a
complete mockery of the alarmist cause and the peddlers of the UN's
“climate” regime. “We will spend at least $100 trillion dollars in order
to reduce the temperature by the end of the century by a grand total of
three tenths of one degree,” he said, noting that was the equivalent of
postponing warming by less than four years. “Again, that is using the
UN's own climate prediction model.”
Top UN “climate” officials have also practically admitted as much.
Christiana Figueres, then the executive director of the UN Framework
Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), boasted in 2012 that “what is
occurring here ... in the whole climate change process is a complete
transformation of the economic structure of the world.” Countless other
UN bureaucrats and even policymakers around the world have made
similarly damning admissions about the real agenda.
In fact, Trump pointed out, the Paris agreement is “less about
climate and more about other countries getting an advantage over the
United States.” Foreign powers and the rest of the world applauded when
the Obama administration signed the pseudo-treaty “simply because it
puts out country, which we all love, at a very, very big economic
disadvantage,” Trump continued, adding that foreign powers wanted
America to remain in because they wanted to keep America down while they
reaped the benefits. “The fact that the Paris deal hamstrings the
United States while empowering some of the world's top polluting
countries should dispel any doubt as to the real reason why foreign
lobbyists wished to keep our magnificent country tied up and bound down
by this agreement,” he said. “It's to give their country an economic
edge over the United States.”
Trump also noted on several occasions the fact that the UN scheme was
aimed largely at redistributing American wealth. Indeed, this reporter
was actually at the December, 2015, UN “climate” summit in Paris to
report on the proverbial “sausage” being made. And it was truly a
spectacle to behold. The first story filed from the UN conference for this magazine
involved a list of demands by 134 Third World governments and tyrants,
known as the Group of 77 Plus (Communist) China, demanding trillions of
dollars from Western taxpayers in exchange for their cooperation with
the scheme. Obama and other globalist Western leaders were more than
happy to comply, thereby securing the approval of some two thirds of the
UN's member regimes. But now, that pipeline into the wallets of U.S.
taxpayers has been shut.
The president portrayed the announcement as an effort to keep his
campaign promises —accurately, in this instance, except for the words
about possibly rejoining. “One by one, we are keeping the promises I
made to the American people during my campaign for president, whether
it's cutting job-killing regulations, appointing and confirming a
tremendous Supreme Court justice, putting in place tough new ethics
rules, achieving a record reduction in illegal immigration on our
southern border, or bringing jobs, plants and factories back into the
United States at numbers which no one, until this point, thought even
possible,” Trump declared. “And believe me, we've just begun. The fruits
of our labor will be seen very shortly even more so.”
The day before Trump's formal announcement, countless establishment
media organs — often ridiculed by Trump as the “fake news” media —
reported that Trump was planning to follow through on his campaign
pledge to “cancel” the UN scheme. However, considering the increasingly
fringe “mainstream” media's track record of constantly being wrong or at
the very least deceptive, few climate skeptics or climate realists were
ready to pop the champagne and celebrate before the formal announcement
was made. But after the speech, Americans all across the country and
from all walks of life celebrated the historic victory for national
sovereignty and the Constitution.
Of course, America is not out of the woods yet, even on “climate.”
Establishment globalists and the discredited “climate” industrial
complex, which feeds off more than $1 billion per day in tax money yet has a track record of being wrong on virtually everything,
are not going anywhere. Instead, they will re-double their efforts,
even as the indisputable evidence debunking their theory continues
piling up — including more than two decades and counting with no observed warming.
As such, patriotic Americans and climate realists must work harder than
ever to protect liberty and sovereignty and put the “climate hoax,” as
Trump used to call it, permanently to rest.
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
Agenda talking points and a list of participants for the upcoming 65th annual Bilderberg globalist confab have been announced. A press release from the official BilderbergMeetings.org
website shows leaders of finance, media and politics will converge in
Chantilly, Virginia at the Westfields Marriott starting this week from
June 1-4. Members who attend conferences are sworn to secrecy
under Chatham House rules which they claim allows them to discuss issues
freely without fear of criticism from the media or the public.
Notable among US attendees are Trump administration National Security
Adviser General H.R. McMaster, Virginia Governor Terry McAuliffe, South
Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham, Arkansas Sen. Tom Cotton and tech
billionaire Peter Thiel. Longtime Bilderberger Henry Kissinger, IMF head
Christine Lagarde and ex-CIA Director David Petraeus are other
noteworthy participants. Chantilly was previously the site of numerous Bilderberg conferences, the latest being in 2009. PARTICIPANTS LIST CHAIRMAN
Castries, Henri de (FRA), Former Chairman and CEO, AXA; President of Institut Montaigne PARTICIPANTS Achleitner, Paul M. (DEU), Chairman of the Supervisory Board, Deutsche Bank AG Adonis, Andrew (GBR), Chair, National Infrastructure Commission Agius, Marcus (GBR), Chairman, PA Consulting Group Akyol, Mustafa (TUR), Senior Visiting Fellow, Freedom Project at Wellesley College Alstadheim, Kjetil B. (NOR), Political Editor, Dagens Næringsliv Altman, Roger C. (USA), Founder and Senior Chairman, Evercore Arnaut, José Luis (PRT), Managing Partner, CMS Rui Pena & Arnaut Barroso, José M. Durão (PRT), Chairman, Goldman Sachs International Bäte, Oliver (DEU), CEO, Allianz SE Baumann, Werner (DEU), Chairman, Bayer AG Baverez, Nicolas (FRA), Partner, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher Benko, René (AUT), Founder and Chairman of the Advisory Board, SIGNA Holding GmbH Berner, Anne-Catherine (FIN), Minister of Transport and Communications Botín, Ana P. (ESP), Executive Chairman, Banco Santander Brandtzæg, Svein Richard (NOR), President and CEO, Norsk Hydro ASA Brennan, John O. (USA), Senior Advisor, Kissinger Associates Inc. Bsirske, Frank (DEU), Chairman, United Services Union Buberl, Thomas (FRA), CEO, AXA Bunn, M. Elaine (USA), Former Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense Burns, William J. (USA), President, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace Çakiroglu, Levent (TUR), CEO, Koç Holding A.S. Çamlibel, Cansu (TUR), Washington DC Bureau Chief, Hürriyet Newspaper Cebrián, Juan Luis (ESP), Executive Chairman, PRISA and El País Clemet, Kristin (NOR), CEO, Civita Cohen, David S. (USA), Former Deputy Director, CIA Collison, Patrick (USA), CEO, Stripe Cotton, Tom (USA), Senator Cui, Tiankai (CHN), Ambassador to the US Döpfner, Mathias (DEU), CEO, Axel Springer SE Elkann, John (ITA), Chairman, Fiat Chrysler Automobiles Enders, Thomas (DEU), CEO, Airbus SE Federspiel, Ulrik (DNK), Group Executive, Haldor Topsøe Holding A/S Ferguson, Jr., Roger W. (USA), President and CEO, TIAA Ferguson, Niall (USA), Senior Fellow, Hoover Institution, Stanford University Gianotti, Fabiola (ITA), Director General, CERN Gozi, Sandro (ITA), State Secretary for European Affairs Graham, Lindsey (USA), Senator Greenberg, Evan G. (USA), Chairman and CEO, Chubb Group Griffin, Kenneth (USA), Founder and CEO, Citadel Investment Group, LLC Gruber, Lilli (ITA), Editor-in-Chief and Anchor “Otto e mezzo”, La7 TV
Guindos, Luis de (ESP), Minister of Economy, Industry and Competiveness
Haines, Avril D. (USA), Former Deputy National Security Advisor Halberstadt, Victor (NLD), Professor of Economics, Leiden University Hamers, Ralph (NLD), Chairman, ING Group Hedegaard, Connie (DNK), Chair, KR Foundation Hennis-Plasschaert, Jeanine (NLD), Minister of Defence, The Netherlands Hobson, Mellody (USA), President, Ariel Investments LLC Hoffman, Reid (USA), Co-Founder, LinkedIn and Partner, Greylock Houghton, Nicholas (GBR), Former Chief of Defence Ischinger, Wolfgang (INT), Chairman, Munich Security Conference Jacobs, Kenneth M. (USA), Chairman and CEO, Lazard Johnson, James A. (USA), Chairman, Johnson Capital Partners Jordan, Jr., Vernon E. (USA), Senior Managing Director, Lazard Frères & Co. LLC Karp, Alex (USA), CEO, Palantir Technologies Kengeter, Carsten (DEU), CEO, Deutsche Börse AG Kissinger, Henry A. (USA), Chairman, Kissinger Associates Inc. Klatten, Susanne (DEU), Managing Director, SKion GmbH Kleinfeld, Klaus (USA), Former Chairman and CEO, Arconic Knot, Klaas H.W. (NLD), President, De Nederlandsche Bank Koç, Ömer M. (TUR), Chairman, Koç Holding A.S. Kotkin, Stephen (USA), Professor in History and International Affairs, Princeton University Kravis, Henry R. (USA), Co-Chairman and Co-CEO, KKR Kravis, Marie-Josée (USA), Senior Fellow, Hudson Institute Kudelski, André (CHE), Chairman and CEO, Kudelski Group Lagarde, Christine (INT), Managing Director, International Monetary Fund Lenglet, François (FRA), Chief Economics Commentator, France 2 Leysen, Thomas (BEL), Chairman, KBC Group Liddell, Christopher (USA), Assistant to the President and Director of Strategic Initiatives Lööf, Annie (SWE), Party Leader, Centre Party Mathews, Jessica T. (USA), Distinguished Fellow, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace McAuliffe, Terence (USA), Governor of Virginia McKay, David I. (CAN), President and CEO, Royal Bank of Canada McMaster, H.R. (USA), National Security Advisor Mexia, António Luís Guerra Nunes (PRT), President, Eurelectric and CEO, EDP Energias de Portugal Micklethwait, John (INT), Editor-in-Chief, Bloomberg LP Minton Beddoes, Zanny (INT), Editor-in-Chief, The Economist Molinari, Maurizio (ITA), Editor-in-Chief, La Stampa Monaco, Lisa (USA), Former Homeland Security Officer Morneau, Bill (CAN), Minister of Finance Mundie, Craig J. (USA), President, Mundie & Associates Murtagh, Gene M. (IRL), CEO, Kingspan Group plc Netherlands, H.M. the King of the (NLD) Noonan, Peggy (USA), Author and Columnist, The Wall Street Journal O’Leary, Michael (IRL), CEO, Ryanair D.A.C. Osborne, George (GBR), Editor, London Evening Standard Papahelas, Alexis (GRC), Executive Editor, Kathimerini Newspaper Papalexopoulos, Dimitri (GRC), CEO, Titan Cement Co. Petraeus, David H. (USA), Chairman, KKR Global Institute Pind, Søren (DNK), Minister for Higher Education and Science Puga, Benoît (FRA), Grand Chancellor of the Legion of Honor and Chancellor of the National Order of Merit Rachman, Gideon (GBR), Chief Foreign Affairs Commentator, The Financial Times Reisman, Heather M. (CAN), Chair and CEO, Indigo Books & Music Inc. Rivera Díaz, Albert (ESP), President, Ciudadanos Party Rosén, Johanna (SWE), Professor in Materials Physics, Linköping University Ross, Wilbur L. (USA), Secretary of Commerce Rubenstein, David M. (USA), Co-Founder and Co-CEO, The Carlyle Group Rubin, Robert E. (USA), Co-Chair, Council on Foreign Relations and Former Treasury Secretary Ruoff, Susanne (CHE), CEO, Swiss Post Rutten, Gwendolyn (BEL), Chair, Open VLD Sabia, Michael (CAN), CEO, Caisse de dépôt et placement du Québec Sawers, John (GBR), Chairman and Partner, Macro Advisory Partners Schadlow, Nadia (USA), Deputy Assistant to the President, National Security Council Schmidt, Eric E. (USA), Executive Chairman, Alphabet Inc. Schneider-Ammann, Johann N. (CHE), Federal Councillor, Swiss Confederation Scholten, Rudolf (AUT), President, Bruno Kreisky Forum for International Dialogue Severgnini, Beppe (ITA), Editor-in-Chief, 7-Corriere della Sera Sikorski, Radoslaw (POL), Senior Fellow, Harvard University Slat, Boyan (NLD), CEO and Founder, The Ocean Cleanup Spahn, Jens (DEU), Parliamentary State Secretary and Federal Ministry of Finance Stephenson, Randall L. (USA), Chairman and CEO, AT&T Stern, Andrew (USA), President Emeritus, SEIU and Senior Fellow, Economic Security Project Stoltenberg, Jens (INT), Secretary General, NATO Summers, Lawrence H. (USA), Charles W. Eliot University Professor, Harvard University Tertrais, Bruno (FRA), Deputy Director, Fondation pour la recherche stratégique Thiel, Peter (USA), President, Thiel Capital Topsøe, Jakob Haldor (DNK), Chairman, Haldor Topsøe Holding A/S Ülgen, Sinan (TUR), Founding and Partner, Istanbul Economics Vance, J.D. (USA), Author and Partner, Mithril Wahlroos, Björn (FIN), Chairman, Sampo Group, Nordea Bank, UPM-Kymmene Corporation Wallenberg, Marcus (SWE), Chairman, Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB Walter, Amy (USA), Editor, The Cook Political Report Weston, Galen G. (CAN), CEO and Executive Chairman, Loblaw Companies Ltd and George Weston Companies White, Sharon (GBR), Chief Executive, Ofcom Wieseltier, Leon (USA), Isaiah Berlin Senior Fellow in Culture and Policy, The Brookings Institution Wolf, Martin H. (INT), Chief Economics Commentator, Financial Times Wolfensohn, James D. (USA), Chairman and CEO, Wolfensohn & Company Wunsch, Pierre (BEL), Vice-Governor, National Bank of Belgium Zeiler, Gerhard (AUT), President, Turner International Zients, Jeffrey D. (USA), Former Director, National Economic Council Zoellick, Robert B. (USA), Non-Executive Chairman, AllianceBernstein L.P.
***
Talking
points to be discussed at the meeting include “The Trump
administration,” “Can globalization be slowed down?” and “nuclear
proliferation.”
More from the BilderbergMeetings.org website: The 65th Bilderberg Meeting to take place from 1 – 4 June 2017 in Chantilly, Virginia, USA. CHANTILLY, 31 MAY 2017 The
65th Bilderberg Meeting will take place from 1-4 June 2017 in
Chantilly, Virginia, USA. As of today, 131 participants from 21
countries have confirmed their attendance. As ever, a diverse group of
political leaders and experts from industry, finance, academia and the
media has been invited. The list of participants is available here. The key topics for discussion this year include:
The Trump Administration: A progress report
Trans-Atlantic relations: options and scenarios
The Trans-Atlantic defence alliance: bullets, bytes and bucks
The direction of the EU
Can globalisation be slowed down?
Jobs, income and unrealised expectations
The war on information
Why is populism growing?
Russia in the international order
The Near East
Nuclear proliferation
China
Current events
Founded
in 1954, the Bilderberg Meeting is an annual conference designed to
foster dialogue between Europe and North America. Every year, between
120-140 political leaders and experts from industry, finance, academia
and the media are invited to take part in the conference. About two
thirds of the participants come from Europe and the rest from North
America; approximately a quarter from politics and government and the
rest from other fields. The conference is a forum for
informal discussions about major issues facing the world. The meetings
are held under the Chatham House Rule, which states that participants
are free to use the information received, but neither the identity nor
the affiliation of the speaker(s) nor any other participant may be
revealed. Thanks to the private nature of the meeting,
the participants are not bound by the conventions of their office or by
pre-agreed positions. As such, they can take time to listen, reflect and
gather insights. There is no desired outcome, no minutes are taken and
no report is written. Furthermore, no resolutions are proposed, no votes
are taken, and no policy statements are issued. Stay tuned to Infowars for up to the minute coverage of the 2017 Bilderberg meeting.
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
What special accommodation has Brooklyn Tech made for Jewish
religious observance? Christian religious observance? That’s right,
Brooklyn Tech hasn’t made any such accommodation. Notice also how in this accommodation to Muslim students, all
non-Muslim students at the prom have to be inconvenienced and made to
comply with Islamic religious laws. Imagine the outcry if Brooklyn Tech
forced all Muslim students to change their behavior in order to
accommodate some Jewish or Christian religious practice: the outcry
would be immediate and vociferous. But such a thing, of course, would
never happen. “The principal also met with the Muslim Student Association Tuesday to make sure this never happens again.” The principal knows who the new overlords are. The principal knows who can destroy careers with charges of “Islamophobia.”
“Brooklyn school won’t move prom over Ramadan conflict,” by Kemberly Richardson, WABC, May 23, 2017 (thanks to Creeping Sharia):
FORT GREENE, Brooklyn (WABC) — Brooklyn Tech seniors will
gather at Pier Sixty for the prom on June 3, but not all their
classmates will be able to attend the big bash at the hot spot billed as
the largest waterfront venue in Manhattan.
The party this year falls during Ramadan, a month-long time of religious fasting and prayer for observant Muslims.
“Obviously the date wasn’t the best date,” said senior Pakeza
Sahbbir, who will be not attending. “You’re not suppose to listen to
music during Ramadan, so that’s why it’s not really allowed.”
In an online petition, students are asking school officials to move
the prom to another day so that everyone can participate. About 1,300
students go to Brooklyn Tech, but the school does not track religious
affiliation.
“I know how it feels to fast,” student Saima Afrin said. “I feel very
tired throughout the day, so I won’t want to go out. I’d sleep and
stuff.” In an effort to accommodate everyone, school officials said they
won’t serve food at the prom until 9 p.m., after fasting ends at
sundown. The principal also met with the Muslim Student Association Tuesday to make sure this never happens again….
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
Trump insider Roger Stone warned globalist billionaire George
Soros has infiltrated the Trump administration through a newly
appointed member of the National Security Council tied to the CFR and a
Soros-funded school in Hungary. “This is very hard to
believe, but I confirmed the facts again this morning. George Soros has
penetrated the Trump White House,” said Stone during an appearance on The Alex Jones Jones Show.
“Soros has planted a mole infiltrating the National Security apparatus:
a woman named Fiona Hill, who has a Harvard background, and has been on
the Soros payroll and the payroll of the Open Society Institute.” Fiona Hill, currently on a leave of absence from the Brookings Institute, has joined the National Security Council as a deputy assistant to the president and the senior director for European and Russian Affairs.
In addition to her work at the Brookings Institute, Hill serves as a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and the Eurasia Foundation.
During her time at the NSC, Hill was visited
by the president and rector of a Soros-funded school in Hungary under
political pressure from Prime Minister Viktor Orban, who accused Soros
of using the school and other non-governmental organizations to directly
influence Hungarian politics and promote mass migration into Europe.
“We wanted to be sure that the U.S. State Department’s immediate,
courageous, outstanding support for CEU spoke for the whole
administration. Viktor Orban has made clear his contempt for statements
from the State department alone,” said the rector of Central European
University, Michael Ignatieff.
“We wanted to make clear that the Trump administration—to the degree it has a view—is speaking through the State Department.”
“We
got unequivocal support [from Fiona Hill’s team at the National
Security Council],” he added. “I went up on the Hill and spoke to
Republican senators and staff. There is a tiny ledge of commonality
between Republicans and Democrats, and academic freedom is one issue
that unites them both.” Orban savaged
Soros in a speech on the floor of the European Parliament,suggested the
globalist billionaire uses a network of lobbying organizations and
non-profits to promote his agenda. “I know that the power, size
and weight of Hungary is much smaller than that of the financial
speculator, George Soros, who is now attacking Hungary,” Orbán said.
“Despite ruining the lives of millions of European with his financial
speculations, being penalized in Hungary for speculations, and who is an
openly admitted enemy of the euro, he is so highly praised that he is
received by the EU’s top leaders.” “To pursue his interests he
pays a number of lobbying organisations operating in the guise of civil
society. He maintains a regular network, with its own promoters, its own
media, hundreds of people, and its own university.”
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
Sedition, the crime of creating a revolt, disturbance, or
violence against lawful civil authority with the intent to cause its
overthrow or destruction. And folks, this is violence, and we’ve seen it
escalate to horrendous atrocities by the socialist left who cannot
accept that Donald J. Trump is America’s President. Kathy
Griffin is a so-called comedian who long ago disavowed her Catholic
upbringing. As a young girl, Griffin attended St. Bernadine’s Elementary
School and began to develop a dislike for organized religion because of
the punishments she said she received from the nuns. Her hatred of God
is obvious in everything she says and does. And she stepped over the
bounds of common decency with her latest unspeakable attack on our
President and his family.
Barron Trump, the 11-year-old first son was apparently watching
television alongside his mother when a photo of Griffin’s video appeared
on the screen, and he allegedly panicked and started screaming, “Mommy,
Mommy!”
He is 11 years old. He doesn’t have a clue of who the demented
comedian, Kathy Griffin even is…so his initial reaction to the image was
that something horrible had happened to his father.
Griffin’s 2007 Emmy Award At the 2007 Emmy awards, Griffin stated in her acceptance speech, “A
lot of people come up here and thank Jesus for this award. I want you to
know that no one had less to do with this award than Jesus.” She went
on to say, “Suck it, Jesus. This is my God now!” referring to the Emmy.
Yes, this woman thinks nothing of offending America’s Christians, our
Messiah Jesus Christ, or those who voted for Donald J. Trump. She has
crossed the line of common decency into a sickness of hatred that could
ultimately destroy her soul. President and Mrs. Trump’s Comments
“Kathy Griffin should be ashamed of herself. My children, especially
my 11-year-old son, Barron, are having a hard time with this. Sick!”
Trump tweeted Wednesday morning. He is so right, and his wife, Melania
went even further. “I Went Too Far,” Says Griffin
Griffin apologized on social media after the Secret Service suggested
she will be investigated for threatening the president, and well she
should be! Her act is one of sedition.
Well, Kathy, how about apologizing to the Trump family?! That’s
something you haven’t done! And especially to their young son, Barron.
Just because you can say something, or do something in our country,
doesn’t mean you should. You have offended Christians and the majority
of the electorate with your macabre and seditious stunt…a stunt where
when you apologized, you even rolled your eyes. There are consequences
Griffin, and one day you’ll see them.
Can you imagine what would have happened she had done this to our
partially black President Obama? The media would have demanded her head
on a platter, her arrest, charged her with sedition, held her until
trial and then sent her to prison for life. But because our President
is not one of the globalist establishment insiders, we hear little to
nothing from the left, the Republican right, and even the pulpits. All
quiet on the Western front! But the tweets are very telling…
The Decay of Societal Decency
I’ve watched the descent of common decency, of courtesy, of the once
recognized standard of propriety, good taste, and modesty degenerate
into tasteless flippancy. The least you can expect from society is some
respect for the decencies, but the slippery slope started long ago.
Perhaps it was in the 1960s, or maybe even earlier, but now it is so
obvious that society is no longer refined; it is vulgar and utterly
repugnant. Anything goes, no matter how distasteful, and that is
evident by the filth spewed from Kathy Griffin. Griffin’s CNN Future
CNN says it has cut ties with the comedian, reluctantly of course.
The network said it had terminated its agreement with the comedian to
appear on its New Year’s Eve programs which she’d hosted for a decade
with Anderson Cooper. I doubt this will last long.
CNN initially called her video “disgusting and offensive.” Anderson
Cooper weighed in with his own reprimand, “For the record, I am appalled
by the photo shoot Kathy Griffin took part in,” he tweeted. “It is
clearly disgusting and completely inappropriate.”
A New Mexico casino said it has canceled a performance by Griffin.
She was scheduled to perform at Route 66 Casino, operated by Laguna
Pueblo, in July.
Griffin has also lost a commercial endorsement deal that she landed
just three weeks ago. Squatty Potty, a Utah-based company whose products
include toilet stools and other bathroom accessories, said it was
suspending an ad campaign that featured Griffin.
And that’s where Griffin belongs…in the toilet, and flushed. Where is the Outrage???
Former first daughter Chelsea Clinton was quick to express her
outrage at Griffin tweeting, “This is vile and wrong. It is never funny
to joke about killing a president.” I wonder if she said that only
because her father was one. Well Chelsea, where are the rest of your
leftist buds, CBS, ABC, NBC, MSNBC, David Brock, George Soros, your
parents, the Obamas, etc.? Not a peep…
Remember when CNN got a rodeo clown fired for wearing an Obama mask? Limbaugh expounded on this today, and here’s what he said:
You would have thought that God and the
Creator himself was being made fun of and laughed at and mocked. This
clown, the man who wore the Obama face mask was smeared, he was
targeted, he was lampooned, he was criticized, he was savaged for
wearing an Obama mask, because it was sacrilegious, it was insulting, it
was beyond the pale, it was over the top.
Now
with Kathy Griffin and her decapitation of Trump stunt all over the
Drive-By Media you hear people saying, “I don’t want to talk about it.
Come on, come on, let’s move on. This is so outrageous, it’s not even
worth talking about.” Mika Brzezinski, soon to be Mika Brzezinski
Scarborough, on Morning Jolt, “I don’t want to talk about it. I don’t
want to talk about it. There’s nothing to see.” Some woman named Molly
Ball who writes for some left-wing publication inside the Beltway was on
CNN. “What’s the big deal? It isn’t any big deal.” Total, total
hypocrisy.
Because It’s Trump, No Big Deal
The left is tolerant of anyone who brings perversion into society and
calls it normal. Yet, they have no tolerance for those who oppose this
perversion and who are appalled at the annihilation of proper etiquette
and common decency towards our fellow man.
We cannot just sit around and pray, we must work. Just as the Lord
said in Ephesians 2:9 “Not of works, lest any man should boast.” And
then followed it with Ephesians 2:10 “For we are his workmanship,
created in Christ Jesus unto GOOD WORKS, which God hath before ordained
that we should walk in them.”
We must stand for righteousness, we must stand for a Godly and decent
society. We must rebuff this filth with all of our being, and as
Ephesians 6:13 states, “Wherefore take unto you the whole armor of God,
that ye may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, TO STAND…”
_____________________________________________________ SEE ALSO:
Trump Slams ‘Sick’ Kathy Griffin Over ISIS-Inspired Photo Shoot
'She should be ashamed of herself,' blasts President
In
what was obviously a call to the ISIS radicals around the world Kathy
Griffin did a tasteless piece where she posed with a severed mannequin
head made to look like Donald Trump's head covered in blood.
Mike
Cernovich talks about how the left are nothing more than a bunch of
pro-pedophilia, pro-terrorism, pro-broken homes death cult. https://twitter.com/Cernovich
Kathy
Griffin is a so-called comedian who long ago disavowed her 
President and Mrs. Trump’s Comments
The Decay of Societal Decency
Now
with Kathy Griffin and her decapitation of Trump stunt all over the
Drive-By Media you hear people saying, “I don’t want to talk about it.
Come on, come on, let’s move on. This is so outrageous, it’s not even
worth talking about.” Mika Brzezinski, soon to be Mika Brzezinski
Scarborough, on Morning Jolt, “I don’t want to talk about it. I don’t
want to talk about it. There’s nothing to see.” Some woman named Molly
Ball who writes for some left-wing publication inside the Beltway was on
CNN. “What’s the big deal? It isn’t any big deal.” Total, total
hypocrisy.