ATTORNEY GENERAL LYNCH REFUSES TO ANSWER QUESTIONS 74 TIMES~FORMER GENERALS & INTELLIGENCE EXPERTS SAY HILLARY CLINTON DANGEROUS TO U.S.

Rep Trey Gowdy: There is STILL the Appearance of "Dual-Track" Justice!

Rep Judge Gomert (TX): BLASTS Attorney General Lynch! 

                           

ATTORNEY GENERAL LYNCH REFUSES TO ANSWER QUESTIONS 74 TIMES

Rep Jim Jordan: Corners Attorney General Lynch / Admits Clinton Case Was DIFFERENT!

FORMER GENERALS, INTELLIGENCE EXPERTS: HILLARY DANGEROUS TO OUR REPUBLIC

SEE: http://www.newswithviews.com/NWV-News/news523.htm; 

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

BY: NWV Senior Political News Writer, Jim Kouri

Despite the FBI and Justice Departments refusal to pursue criminal charges against presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton, a number of military leaders who specialize in intelligence gathering and analysis believe Mrs. Clinton is unfit to command the nation's entire military and public safety services.

“Clinton is a malignant narcissist who believes she knows best and therefore whatever she does is legal and correct including misconduct if it furthers her globalist agenda,” said political strategist Michael Baker. “The best generals – those opposed to the New World Order philosophy – fear that Hillary Clinton acting as the U.S. Commander in Chief will be another step down towards Third-World status,” said Baker.

Appearing on a decidedly progressive television news program, formerDirector of Central Intelligence Michael Hayden told the show’s audience that former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s use of an unsecured email server while conducting highly sensitive government business shows a leader who is dangerous to the republic and state secrets.

Hayden served in the United States Air Force for 41 years attaining the rank of four-star general. He was appointed as the Director of the National Security Agency and then as the Director for the CIA. Although widely respected by political leaders in both parties — he worked for both Presidents Bill Clinton and George W. Bush — he has openly battled with those who opposed the tactics used by the CIA and NSA in the war on Islamic terrorism.

During his appearance on MSNBC, a news organization thought to be unfriendly to conservatives especially those working in the military, law enforcement and the intelligence community, the discussion about the alleged security breaches turned to Hillary Clinton’s now famous email and her personal email server that she used instead of the one given to her by the U.S. State Department.

While as a rule MSNBC is biased in favor of Democrats, especially leaders such as President Barack Obama, former President Bill Clinton and now Hillary Clinton, Hayden did not mince words in discussing the latest Clinton scandal. Hayden said, “Number one, put legality aside for a second, [what Clinton did] was stupid and dangerous.

“Dangerous to whom?” asked host Joe Scarborough. “Dangerous to her. And [dangerous] to the republic and to American secrets. But I don’t even think it was legal. That has to be against policy. I’m stunned that her staff allowed her to do that in 2009 given the unhappy outcome that this [server snafu] guaranteed once [she] started doing that,” Hayden said.

Another top intelligence expert, who served under President Barack Obama, has similar beliefs as Gen. Hayden. Former Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn told Fox News Channel that the probability that Hillary Clinton’s emails were hacked is very high. Flynn, who ran the Defense Intelligence Agency after serving at the Pentagon and recently retired, said it was likely Clinton’s emails — and those sent to her by her staff such as Huma Abedin and Cheryl Miller — were hacked, he told Fox News anchor Megyn Kelly. [YouTube Link]

Although Clinton and her minions are calling any allegations against her a "right-wing conspiracy," Rep. Trey Gowdy, the Republican chairman of the House Select Committee on Benghazi, was correct in saying he and the other Republicans have nothing to do with the FBI’s investigation. The case was referred to the FBI by two Obama administration inspectors general: one from the intelligence community and the other from the Department of State. Both men are Democratic appointees.

Retired U.S. Army Maj. Gen. Paul Vallely, who serves as a contributor to several news organizations, also chimed in about Mrs. Clinton: “We have witnessed this same behavior before, even Hillary Clinton in Bosnia, sensationalizing [her] experience to look and appear like a hero in a dangerous environment.”

During a speech she gave before a crowd of African American voters, Democratic Party presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton likened American police officers with Muslim terrorists, causing one of the nation's most popular and articulate lawmen to blast her as being a racist and a liar. It was no surprise that Mrs. Clinton's admirers in the news media chose to overlook her words and few Americans actually saw the video footage of her anti-cop vitriol.

“Yes, I believe there are all kinds of underground movements and efforts in our country that try to use violence or assert beliefs that I find often lead to violence,” Clinton said before she outright accused police officers of being terrorists. “I think that when you have police violence that terrorized communities, that doesn’t show the respect that you’re supposed to have from respecting people in your authority, that can feel, also, terrorizing,” said Mrs. Clinton, who fared well in her criminal investigation thanks to corrupt a FBI director, a bought-and-paid-for attorney general and a President as guilty as Clinton.

According to African American Sheriff David Clarke of Milwaukee County in Wisconsin, for years the Left has smeared law enforcement officers as racists by claiming that black and other minority crime suspects are more likely to be shot by police. To hear many liberals tell it, police cruise around looking for minority kids to gun down for sport, according to the well-known sheriff who has been angry with the treatment of law enforcement by the likes of politicians and leftists.

Ironically, reports have surfaced that allege Clinton and her former boss, Barack Hussein Obama, are credited with the creation of ISIS and that they trained and armed that Islamist army in the hope that they would help push Syria’s President Bashar al-Assad out of power.

But now science has shown this leftist narrative to be a lie. A study was conducted at Washington State University using active duty police and highly realistic simulators that mimic dangerous scenarios officers encounter in the line of duty. The result? Police are significantly less likely to mistakenly shoot minority suspects, and took significantly longer to fire at armed black suspects than armed white suspects, according to Milwaukee, Wisconsin, County Sheriff David Clarke.

‘While I’m happy to see my fellow law enforcement officers vindicated against this persistent liberal smear, there’s also something very troubling about the results of this study. There are only two factors an officer should take into account when deciding whether to use their weapon against an armed suspect: his or her own safety and the safety of nearby civilians,” Clarke explained.

WHY WE CAN'T ASSUME CATHOLICS OR ORTHODOX CHRISTIANS ARE SAVED

WHY WE CAN'T ASSUME CATHOLICS OR ORTHODOX CHRISTIANS ARE SAVED 

BY JEFF MAPLES

SEE: http://pulpitandpen.org/2016/07/13/why-we-cant-assume-catholics-or-orthodox-christians-are-saved/; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

Historically, Roman Catholicism has been considered by Protestants and Evangelicals to be an expression of faith that distorts the Biblical gospel of Jesus Christ. While Protestants hold to a soteriological belief of “grace alone through faith alone,” in contrast, Roman Catholics, and Orthodox Christians hold to an unbiblical view of salvation by faith plus works. For them, the sacraments are a requirement for grace, and salvation cannot be attained apart from them. For this reason, bible-believing Christians have always held to the belief that Roman Catholics are unsaved, because they trust in their own works, as opposed to the finished work of Christ on the cross, for their salvation.

For by grace you have been saved through faith. And this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God, not a result of works, so that no one may boast. – Ephesians 2:8-9

Sadly, during this modern time of ecumenical “unity,” many professing bible-believing Christians have compromised on this. For them, it has become a matter of “individual faith,” and regardless of your religious affiliation, anyone who has that “personal relationship” with Christ can be saved. But there are several errors in this line of reasoning, and it is extremely reckless to assume that Catholics or Orthodox Christians are truly saved. Here’s why.

Denominational Affiliation is an Expression of Beliefs

As stated above, Roman Catholics officially hold to unbiblical doctrines that are opposed to the true Gospel of Jesus Christ. In fact, they are designed in such a manner to forbidyou from believing the true Gospel. One can only assume that a Roman Catholic is a Roman Catholic because he or she believes the Roman Catholic system to be true. While it is possible that a practicing Roman Catholic can be saved, as God can save anybody he pleases, the likelihood of them remaining in the Catholic Church long term is slim. Upon justification, the Holy Spirit begins sanctification in the new believer, and will ultimately lead the believer to truth, and out of the false church. “For God is not a God of confusion but of peace,” (1 Corinthians 14:33). It is of utmost importance for bible-believing Christians to call all who are caught up in this false system to repent and leave the Roman Catholic or Orthodox church.

For if someone comes and proclaims another Jesus than the one we proclaimed, or if you receive a different spirit from the one you received, or if you accept a different gospel from the one you accepted, you put up with it readily enough. – 2 Corinthians 11:4

Roman Catholics and Orthodox Christians Practice Idolatry

Through aberrant doctrines such as transubstantiation, Roman Catholics, and many Orthodox sects, believe that the bread and wine of the Eucharist are the true body and blood of Jesus Christ and that it is worthy of worship. This is a regular practice in the daily Mass. Further, prayers and worship are regularly offered to Mary and the canonized saints, and relics of past saints and popes are regularly idolized in the church. In every altar in a Roman Catholic church, there will be placed a relic (i.e. bone, vile of blood, or some body part) of a martyr or canonized saint. This practice of idolatry cannot be overlooked when considering someone to be a brother or sister in Christ. 1 Corinthians 6:9-10 clearly states that those who practice idolatry will not enter the Kingdom of Heaven.

Or do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men who practice homosexuality, nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God. – 1 Corinthians 6:9-10

Roman Catholics and Orthodox Christians Reject Biblical Authority

Roman Catholics and Orthodox Christians do not hold to a belief in the final authority of Scripture, rather, Catholics’ authority is in the hierarchical system of priests with the Roman Pontiff at the head, and the Orthodox Church’s authority comes from the seven ecumenical councils. A rejection of biblical authority is a rejection of Christ himself, for the Scriptures say that Jesus is the Word of God made flesh.

In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.He was in the beginning with God….And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us, and we have seen his glory, glory as of the only Son from the Father, full of grace and truth. – John 1:1-2,14

We cannot compromise the Gospel by assuming that a Roman Catholic or Orthodox Christian who professes to be saved is truly saved. Counterfeit systems of Christianity are very good at distorting their identity. They often speak the same language as believers, yet mean something completely different. They are often agreeable with the believer and are experts at practicing cunning.

Even if a Catholic is truly born again, if they refuse to leave their false church, we must treat them as though they are not. By their own profession, confession, and expression of faith, they continue in sin by practicing idolatry and rejecting Christ. We must not allow them to speak in our pulpits or join with them in any spiritual enterprise. We are to avoid them, treat them like unbelievers, and call them to repent.

But now I am writing to you not to associate with anyone who bears the name of brother if he is guilty of sexual immorality or greed, or is an idolater, reviler, drunkard, or swindler—not even to eat with such a one. – 1 Corinthians 5:11

SOUTHERN BAPTIST LEADER RUSSELL MOORE PROMOTING MUSLIM-CHRISTIAN-JEWISH INTERFAITH PRAYER

RUSSELL MOORE PROMOTING MUSLIM-CHRISTIAN-JEWISH INTERFAITH PRAYER

BY JEFF MAPLES

SEE: http://pulpitandpen.org/2016/07/12/russell-moore-promoting-muslim-christian-jewish-interfaith-prayer/; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

I want to start by stating how tragic the recent shooting in Dallas was, as well as others who have lost their lives during encounters with police officers. It is not my intent to try or convict any person on either side of the aisle without due process, and I believe it to be highly irresponsible for others to do so. At the heart of the matter is sin, and the only answer to sin is the Gospel of Jesus Christ. The families of the individuals who have lost their lives, in Dallas, and elsewhere, are in my prayers. I pray that through the sin of man, and the consequences thereof, that Christ will be made known, and God will be glorified.

What is often overlooked, especially in the Christian church, are the after effects of our response to these tragedies. While it seems admirable that people from all walks of life would come together to mourn the tragic loss of life, many times when Christians participate in an event like this, the unintended consequence is a total disregard for God’s commandments. Proverbs 14:12 says, “There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way to death.”

An interfaith prayer gathering is being held in Dallas where President Obama is expected to speak, and choirs from multiple religions and faith backgrounds will be singing together. It will be followed by an interfaith prayer with Christians, Muslims, and Jews. Interfaith prayer leaders include Rev. Dr. Sheron C. Patterson, The United Methodist Church of North Texas, Imam Omar Suleiman, resident scholar of Valley Ranch Islamic Center and founding member of Faith Forward Dallas Rabbi Andrew Marc Paley, senior rabbi of Temple Shalom Dallas.

In promotion of this event, Russell Moore, president of the Southern Baptist Ethics and Religious Liberties Commission tweeted the following:

The image linked in the tweet can be found here.

I’m having an extremely difficult time trying to figure out what the biblical motivation is for his promotion of this event. What possible good does Moore believe will come from gathering God haters with believers in unholy unity for a prayer service to multiple dieties?

I can understand the human nature to grieve over the tragic loss of life, but as Christians, we use the opportunity to promote Jesus Christ. What seems right in the eyes of man is unfruitful, shameful, and brings death (Romans 6:21). Will God even be at this event? Scripture says,

But your iniquities have separated you from your God; And your sins have hidden His face from you, So that He will not hear. -Isaiah 59:2 

Now we know that God does not hear sinners; but if anyone is a worshiper of God and does His will, He hears him. -John 9:31

Unless you believe that Muslims and Jews are worshipers of God–that is, the true God of the Bible–then you must logically conclude that God is not going to hear their prayers. Scripture is replete with passages that teach that God does not hear the prayers of unbelievers (Proverbs 1:24-28, Jeremiah 14:10-12, Isaiah 59:2, John 9:31, etc.).

Further, the Scriptures clearly command believers not to partake in any spiritual enterprise with unbelievers.

Do not be unequally yoked with unbelievers. For what partnership has righteousness with lawlessness? Or what fellowship has light with darkness? – 2 Corinthians 6:14

God is truth, and truth has no timing. The truth is, the majority of these people are lost (Matthew 7:13-14). The majority of residents in Dallas are lost, and in need of a savior. Many of the family members of the officers lost in Dallas do not know Jesus Christ. The natural inclination of man’s wicked heart (Jeremiah 17:9) is to be quiet, join hands, and try our best not to offend anyone who is mourning, but Scriptures teach we are to preach the Gospel in and out of season, and correct those who are mourning, and looking for answers outside of Christ (2 Timothy 4:2). Scripture teaches that those who are in Christ that mourn will be comforted (Matthew 5:4). It is only Christ that can bring comfort–not an interfaith, Christ-denying service that downplays the Gospel (John 14:6). We as Christians need to be leading the charge for the advancement of the Gospel–the Gospel that saves, comforts, and reconciles–in the face of a grieving, lost world.

I’m not saying that we should beat these mourning people over the head with a bible, per se, but they should not only be able to see the joy that is in us, through Christ, even during a time of mourning, but they should also be able to see our strength and resolve in Christ, by not compromising the word of truth, by holding hands and praying with those why deny our God, and hate our savior, Jesus Christ.

Stand apart (2 Corinthians 6:17), and be salt and light.

“You are the salt of the earth, but if salt has lost its taste, how shall its saltiness be restored? It is no longer good for anything except to be thrown out and trampled under people’s feet. You are the light of the world. A city set on a hill cannot be hidden. Nor do people light a lamp and put it under a basket, but on a stand, and it gives light to all in the house. In the same way, let your light shine before others, so that they may see your good works and give glory to your Father who is in heaven.” –Matthew 5:13-16

OBAMA ADMINISTRATION'S SYRIAN REFUGEE PROCESSING NUMBERS ACCELERATE~ILLEGALS GET $2 BILLION MORE "SNAP" FOOD BENEFITS THAN POOR AMERICANS

OBAMA ADMINISTRATION'S SYRIAN REFUGEE PROCESSING NUMBERS ACCELERATE

BY WARREN MASS 

SEE: http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/immigration/item/23626-obama-administration-s-syrian-refugee-processing-numbers-accelerate; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

The number of Syrian refugees being processed for entry into the United States has accelerated in recent months, increasing the likelihood that the Obama administration will meet its goal of processing 10,000 such refugees by the end of the fiscal year in September.

The Wall Street Journal reported on July 13 that the United States pledged last year to resettle 85,000 refugees from all over the world during the fiscal year that began on October 1, including at least 10,000 Syrian refugees. Fiscal year 2016 ends September 30.

However, noted the report, by March 31, which was halfway through the fiscal year, only 1,285 Syrians had arrived. 

Then the pace rapidly increased. By June 30, the number of Syrians had jumped to 5,211, and the total number of refugee admissions had reached 49,791.

The Journal report, which cited official government data, stated that of the Syrian refugees admitted this year, 20 percent have been adult men, another 20 percent were adult women and 60 percent were children. The vast majority of the men were part of a family unit, the report indicated, citing a State Department spokesman.

Owing to security checks, it takes about two years for a refugee to be admitted to the United States, noted the report. As a general practice, the vetting includes background checks, multiple interviews of family members (both together and apart), fingerprinting, and iris scans.

The increase in refugee arrivals  “does not represent a curtailment, in any way, of our comprehensive and robust security screening,” the Journal quoted the unnamed State Department spokesman as saying, adding that “Syrian refugees are subject to even more scrutiny” than other refugees.

However, Mark Krikorian, executive director of the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS), a non-profit research organization that advocates for greater restrictions on immigration, told the Journal that he wasn’t confident in the vetting. “They aren’t going to admit the next 5,000 Syrians in three months unless they are rushing through the supposedly rigid security screening,” Krikorian said.

Our article posted on June 13 presented similar information and observed that the Obama administration had cranked up the number of Syrian refugees being processed to the rate of 100 refugees per day.

In that article, we cited an AP report from April indicating that only 1,000 Syrian refugees had moved to the United States during the first six months of the fiscal year, That report also noted that the Obama administration had opened a resettlement center in Amman, Jordan, in February that began interviewing 600 refugees a day to help it meet its goal of processing 10,000 Syrian refugees by the end of fiscal year.

We also cited a report at Conservative Review stating that while only 100-250 refugees per month had been admitted for the first six months of fiscal year 2016, “that number has increased exponentially since April.”

The CR report (citing figures from the Refugee Processing Center) noted that 1,000 refugees were admitted in May and 950 more were admitted during the first eight days of June. The CR report also said:

As we noted in April, the Administration has set up a “resettlement surge center” in Amman, Jordan to process the refugee applications expeditiously. While the American people were promised a vetting process of 18-24 months per refugee, this new “surge” agenda has condensed the process to just three months. Now that this center has been operating for several months, Obama has a ready-made refugee mill that can churn out thousands of applications per month.

The lack of adequate vetting has been a major objection mentioned by U.S. governors opposed to the resettlement of Syrian refugees in their states. Among them is New Hampshire Governor Maggie Hassan, the only Democrat among those governors. Hassan, who is running for the Senate in 2016, said the federal government should “halt acceptance of refugees from Syria until intelligence and defense officials can assure that the process for vetting all refugees ... is as strong as possible.”

In an open letter to President Obama last year, Texas Governor Greg Abbott also mentioned security concerns as being paramount among his objections, stating, in part:

I — and millions of Americans — implore you to halt your plans to accept more Syrian refugees in the United States. A Syrian “refugee” appears to have been part of the Paris terror attack. American humanitarian compassion could be exploited to expose Americans to similar deadly danger. The reasons for such concerns are plentiful.

The FBI director testified to Congress that the federal government does not have the background information that is necessary to effectively conduct proper security checks on Syrian nationals, Director Comey explained: “We can query our database until the cows come home, but there will be nothing show up because we have no record of them.”

The rapid increasing in the rate of refugee processing indicates that the Obama administration is cutting corners and rushing refugees through the resettlement center in order to meet what is basically a political objective of meeting its announced target. Proper vetting and national security are taking a back seat to that objective.

Related articles:

Obama Administration’s Syrian Refugee Processing Numbers Skyrocket

State Department Sets New Record for Approving the Admission of Syrian Refugees

Here Comes the Obama/UN Refugee “Surge” — Rebranded as “Safe Alternative Pathways”

Federal Judge Denies Texas Request to Block Syrian Refugee Settlement

Texas Suing Federal Government to Block Syrian Refugee Settlement

Most Governors Now Openly Oppose Obama's Syrian Refugee Plan

Syrian Refugee Crisis Spotlights Anti-Christian Bias of Obama Admin.

Plight of Christian Refugees Ignored During Refugee Crisis Discussions

Globalists Who Created Refugee Crisis Now Exploiting It

The Real Refugee Problem — and How to Solve It

______________________________________________________

Report: Illegal Immigrants Get More Food Stamp Benefits Than Poor American Citizens: “$2 Billion A Year”

BY MAC SLAVO

SEE: http://freedomoutpost.com/report-illegal-immigrants-get-more-food-stamp-benefits-than-poor-american-citizens-2-billion-a-year/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

There’s a reason Americans are angered over illegal immigration and despite what liberal-leaning socialists like Hillary Clinton and the Huffington Post may suggest, it has absolutely nothing to do with racism.

It’s an economics issue, plain and simple.

And as highlighted by a new report from the Washington Examiner, it’s actually American citizens who are feeling the brunt of the pain and being treated unfairly, not the other way around:


Illegal immigrant households tapping into the federal food stamp program are receiving $1.4 billion to $2.1 billion a year despite their ineligibility, according to a new analysis of the Agriculture Department program.

 And rules guiding who can get food stamps favor households with illegal immigrants over all-U.S. citizen homes, according to the detailed report from the Center for Immigration Studies released Monday morning.


David North of cis.org explain how the scam works:


Let’s say that the all-citizen family consisted of three people, employed father, stay-at-home mother, and a small child. Dad makes $2,400 a month. The family’s income is too high for food stamps since the maximum monthly income is $2,177 for a family of three.

Then next door there is a mixed family, also three people, with the father being the only worker, also earning $2,400 a month. The difference is that the father is an ineligible alien and so, under many states’ regulations, one-third of the family’s income is ignored (prorated is the word in SNAP circles), leaving the family with a nominal income of $1,600 a month that allows the family to get a food stamps allotment, but only for the two citizens, not for all three in the family.

There is thus a band of households of three with earnings in the range of $2,177/mo. at the bottom to $2,589/mo. at the top that would be eligible for food stamps but only if the wage earner is a non-eligible alien in the eyes of USDA; all-citizen households in this band would not be eligible for food stamps. (Here’s the math: $2,589 = 150 percent of $1,726, the maximum income allowable for a family of two when there is a 33.3 percent discount on the illegal’s wages).


That $2 billion a year in free food offered to people who shouldn’t be in this country in the first place is only part of it.

An already overburdened American taxpayer is also forced, by way of the gun, to pay for illegal immigrants’ health care, college tuition, and other social services.

But if you argue against illegal immigration or the “free” services they consume you are a racist.

We’d argue you’re a realist, especially if you understand that all of these free services only work until the government runs out of other peoples’ money.

Little Girl Blasphemes God, Calls Down the Rain

BY JEFF MAPLES

SEE: http://pulpitandpen.org/2016/07/12/little-girl-blasphemes-god-calls-down-the-rain/; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

If you’ve never heard of Rodney Howard Browne, that’s probably a good thing. His church, in Tampa, FL, is a New Apostolic Reformation (NAR) charismatic church that regularly blasphemes the Holy Spirit. Recently, at Browne’s church, a little girl that appears to be about 12 years old took the stage to “preach” to the congregation. During the seven minute video, this girl repeatedly tells her audience to “be a funnel,” and to hold their hands up in the air, because they can’t receive the water unless your “funnel is open.”

There is no mention at all of Jesus Christ in this so-called sermon. This entire charade is pure blasphemy. You can see the audience getting into it, while Browne, himself, is standing on the stage directing this young child into this sinful idolatry. He tells her to “speak in tongues,” in which she began to babble the same, unintelligible nonsense over and over, in what appears to be a drunken stupor with her eyes squinted and a peculiar slurred speech (did they slip something in her drink?), while she was cheered on, and told that this is “how it’s done,” and “what it’s about.”

Be sure to go here and like our Facebook page.

One thing we can be certain about is that this little girl was, sadly, not receiving an outpouring of the Holy Spirit, but of a completely foreign spirit altogether. This is not of God. While they may have been “funneling” something, it wasn’t blessings from God.

Unless Browne repents, he’s going to have a rude awakening some day when he realizes what he’s done.

It would be better for him if a millstone were hung around his neck and he were cast into the sea than that he should cause one of these little ones to sin. – Luke 17:2

…and another,

TRUMP DEMANDS SUPREME COURT JUSTICE GINSBERG RESIGN FOR CALLING HIM A "FAKER"

"HER MIND IS SHOT"; 

AND MAYBE HER BODY TOO?

TRUMP DEMANDS SUPREME COURT JUSTICE GINSBERG RESIGN

Questions her mental capacity to serve 

on the highest court

BY KURT NIMMO

SEE: http://www.infowars.com/trump-demands-supreme-court-justice-ginsberg-resign/; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

Earlier this week, Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg violated the code of conduct for federal judges when she trashed Donald Trump.

The code states federal judges should not “publicly endorse or oppose a candidate for public office.” Although Supreme Court justices are not bound by the code, Chief Justice John G. Roberts has said the court adheres to it.

Donald Trump responded to Ginsberg’s unethical comments by sending out one of his scathing tweets. He questioned her mental fitness and demanded she resign.

Justice Ginsburg of the U.S. Supreme Court has embarrassed all by making very dumb political statements about me. Her mind is shot – resign!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) July 13, 2016

“I don’t think the justices should be speaking out about presidential politics,” Gabe Roth, executive director of Fix the Court, a nonpartisan organization advocating for accountability from the justices, told the Boston Herald. “It’s part of the job of being a Supreme Court judge to be held to a high ethical standard.”

If November’s election ends up in litigation, as did the contested 2000 election when the court ruled (Bush v. Palm Beach County Canvassing Board) in favor of George W. Bush over Al Gore, Ginsberg would be expected to recuse herself, as stipulated in the federal recusal statute.

“Any justice, judge, or magistrate judge of the United States shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned,” the code states.

Ginsberg demonstrated her lack of impartiality in 2014 when she made negative comments about Texas imposing restrictions on abortion at a time when a challenge to the law was before the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. The case made it to the Supreme Court and Ginsberg ruled with the majority to strike down the law.

Ginsberg’s remarks reveal the desperation of the establishment as it confronts the possibility of a Trump presidency and the appointments he will make to the Court.

In March, Hillary Clinton warned about the consequences of a Trump victory. “What kind of justice would a President Trump appoint, or for that matter what kind of attorney general?” she asked. “Once you make the extreme normal, you open the door to even worse.”

According to Patrick J. Buchanan, the composition of the Supreme Court is a question that should be left to the American people.

“What kind of Supreme Court do the American people wish to have? That is a question to be decided in 2016—not by a lame-duck president, but by the American electorate in November,” Buchanan wrote in February.

“Does the nation want an activist judiciary to remake America into a more liberal society, as Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor would like to see it remade?

“Or do the American people want a more constitutional court that returns power to the people and their elected representatives?”

______________________________________________________

Ginsburg on Trump: 'He is a faker'

Published on Jul 12, 2016

Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg called Donald Trump a 'faker' Monday. The justice's comments were part of an interview for a book on Chief Justice John Roberts. During the talk, the interviewer asked about Trump as a follow-up to earlier comments made by Ginsberg for The Associated Press and New York Times. The Justice replied that Trump has, quote, " no consistency about him. He says whatever comes into his head at the moment. He really has an ego. ... How has he gotten away with not turning over his tax returns?" Ginsberg says she can't imagine what America will become if Trump is elected president.
http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/12/politic...

MANNY SILVA PLEADS: RAVI, PLEASE DO NOT GO TO "TOGETHER 2016", AN EVENT FILLED WITH "CHRISTIAN" APOSTATES & HERETICS SANCTIONED BY THE POPE

SEE OUR PREVIOUS POSTS ABOUT THE ECUMENICAL "TOGETHER 2016":

http://ratherexposethem.blogspot.com/2016/07/together-2016-false-unity-among-false.html

http://ratherexposethem.blogspot.com/2016/06/ecumenical-together-2016-organizer.html 

Ravi, Please Do Not Go To Together 2016

BY MANNY SILVA

SEE: https://reformednazarene.wordpress.com/2016/07/13/ravi-please-do-not-go-to-together-2016/; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

Posted on July 13, 2016 by reformednazarene

I sent this letter to Ravi Zacharias today.  Please pray that he reverses his decision to speak at Together 2016.

Dear Ravi,

I have had great respect for you over the years. My small ministry is in apologetics and warning Christians about false teaching, and has included the use of many of your videos and writings as a resource.

Yet, I am greatly concerned that you have joined the lineup of speakers at the Together 2016 gathering at the National Mall this weekend. I sincerely urge you to pull out of this event before its too late. Although I am not a theologian or a pastor with the greatest grasp of Scripture, I do know that according to the Bible, this is not the kind of event that a Bible believing Christian would be attending. We are commanded clearly in Scripture to stay away from those who teach a false gospel- and this is exactly the kind of gathering it has become. Most troubling is the fact that Pope Francis, leader of the false religion of Roman Catholicism, has given his blessing to this event, and will be addressing the people remotely.

Also troubling is the great amount of music artists and speakers who have a history of compromise with, and promoting Roman Catholic ideas and even its mystical practices. Again, Scripture clearly teaches us to avoid such people, not fellowship with them.

Finally, there are clearly false teachers in this group who teach things that are outside of Scripture. There is Ann Voskamp, who claims to have intimate encounters with God, much of it with an erotic like twist to it. There is Mark Batterson, who wrote a book that basically promotes a form of Christian witchcraft. I could name others as well.

Your presence at this event will only lead to more confusion, and will further contribute to your loss of credibility among those who believe in the authority of Scripture, and who desire to obey rather than compromise God’s word. You made a mistake once before, when you attended and spoke at a Mormon assembly, failing to address to difference between the Mormon religion, and true Christianity. Please do not make the same mistake again, and heed the words of Scripture. If not, I am afraid you will be yet another once-solid apologist for Christ, and you will be known as an apologist for the coming one world religion.

I pray that you will repent of this decision, and that you will also call out this gathering for what it really is: a false unity consisting of people who are not being faithful to the real Gospel of Jesus Christ.

“Have nothing to do with the fruitless deeds of darkness, but rather expose them.” Eph. 5:11

Sincerely in Christ,

Manny Silva

Stand For Truth Ministries