REPUBLICAN OPERATIVES LAUNCH ALL-OUT EFFORT TO UNBIND DELEGATES & DENY TRUMP THE NOMINATION

REPUBLICAN OPERATIVES LAUNCH ALL-OUT EFFORT TO UNBIND DELEGATES 

& DENY TRUMP THE NOMINATION 

BY MICHAEL SNYDER

SEE: http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/archives/republican-operatives-launch-all-out-effort-to-unbind-the-delegates-and-deny-donald-trump-the-nomination; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

If you think that Donald Trump already has the Republican nomination locked up, then you don’t understand what is going on behind the scenes.  It has long been my contention that the elite will move heaven and earth in order to keep Trump from ever setting foot in the Oval Office.  One way that they could try to do this is by attempting to deny him the nomination at the Republican convention next month.  Over the past couple of days, the Washington Post, CNN and a whole host of other mainstream news outlets have been reporting on a new “last-ditch effort” that has been launched by Republican operatives to get the Republican convention Rules Committee to unbind all of the delegates and allow them to vote however they want.  As you will see below, they can do this, and if they get enough votes they will do it.

This current effort is different from what we have seen so far during this campaign season, because it is actually being organized by the delegates themselves.  The following comes from the Washington Post…

Dozens of Republican convention delegates are hatching a new plan to block Donald Trump at this summer’s party meetings, in what has become the most organized effort so far to stop the businessman from becoming the GOP presidential nominee.

The moves come amid declining poll numbers for Trump and growing concern among Republicans that he is squandering his chance to defeat Democrat Hillary Clinton. Several controversies — including his racial attacks on a federal judge, his renewed call to temporarily ban Muslims from entering the United States and his support for changing the nation’s gun laws — have raised fears among Republicans that Trump is not really a conservative and is too reckless to run a successful race.

This movement is being spearheaded by a delegate from Colorado named Kendal Unruh.  She is actually a key member of the Republican convention Rules Committee, and this is very important for reasons that I will explain below.

For her, it is not about getting some other specific candidate nominated.  Rather, the entire goal is simply to stop Donald Trump…

“This literally is an ‘Anybody but Trump’ movement,” said Kendal Unruh, a Republican delegate from Colorado who is leading the campaign. “Nobody has any idea who is going to step in and be the nominee, but we’re not worried about that. We’re just doing that job to make sure that he’s not the face of our party.”

So what will it take for Unruh and her allies to be successful?

As Fox News explained, there are basically two courses of action…

To prevail, Unruh needs a majority of the 112 members of the convention rules committee, which has two delegates from each state and territory. Then, a majority of the full convention’s 2,472 delegates would have to approve.

There’s a Plan B. If Unruh can win over one-fourth support from the rules committee — just 29 delegates— the full convention must vote on her proposal. So far she’s got around 10 supporters though some prefer delaying the rule’s impact until the 2020 convention, she said.

On Thursday night, Unruh was on a conference call that included at least 30 delegates from 15 different states, and the Washington Post says that regional coordinators for this effort have been recruited “in Arizona, Iowa, Louisiana, Washington and other states.”

One individual that took part in this conference call on Thursday night told CNN that calls are pouring in from people all over the country that want to be part of this movement…

“I will tell you, about every two hours people contact me about how to join this effort,” Lonegan said. “This has never been done before, so there’s no textbook on how to do it. So we’re building an organic effort, state by state, to convince members of the Rules Committee to sign onto a rule that unbinds the delegates to vote their moral conscience.”

So could the Republican convention Rules Committee actually do this?

Could they actually unbind all of the delegates and allow them to vote however they wished?

Well, yes they actually could do this.  As Time Magazine has explained, the Republican convention Rules Committee essentially has the power to make up any rules that they want…

It has the power to review and amend all of the rules of the Republican Party, pending ratification by the full convention. If it wanted to, it could insert a rule that says only candidates with blue hair could be the party’s nominee. It’s that powerful. In a contested scenario, the Rules Committee would be ground zero for fights over who and how candidates are nominated on the floor, as well as how the convention itself is conducted.

And thanks to political wrangling by the Cruz campaign, we do know that the rules committee is dominated by delegates that are loyal to Cruz…

The convention rules committee is made up of one man and one woman from each of the 50 states, U.S. territories, and the District of Columbia. Dominated by party insiders and loyalists to Texas Sen. Ted Cruz—who aggressively worked state conventions to secure slots on the committee—it remains to be seen what the committee’s appetite would be for such a dramatic break from the existing rules.

If I was Donald Trump, I would be taking this very, very seriously.

But at this point he seems to be brushing it off …

“I have tremendous support and get the biggest crowds by far and any such move would not only be totally illegal but also a rebuke of the millions of people who feel so strongly about what I am saying,” Trump said in a statement. “People that I defeated soundly in the primaries will do anything to get a second shot — but there is no mechanism for it to happen.”

Right at this moment we still have about a month left before the convention.

So that gives those involved in the anti-Trump movement quite a bit of time to rally their forces.

The rule change that would unbind all of the delegates and free them up to “vote their consciences” has already been drafted.  Here is the text of the proposed rule change…

Preserving Delegates’ Ability to Vote Their Individual Conscience

The secretary of the national convention shall receive and faithfully announce and record each delegate’s vote in accordance with these rules. If any such delegate notifies the secretary of his or her intent to cast a vote of conscience, whether personal or religious, each such delegate shall be unbound and unconstrained by these rules on any given vote, including the first ballot for the selection of the Republican nominee for President of the United States, without the risk of challenge, sanction, or retribution by the Republican National Committee. Allowable personal reasons shall include the public disclosure of one or more grievous acts of personal conduct by a nominee candidate, including but not limited to, criminally actionable acts, acts of moral turpitude or extreme prejudice, and/or notorious public statements of support for positions that clearly oppose or contradict the policies embodied in the Republican Party’s platform as established at the national convention.

In my new book, I warn about the great political shaking that is coming to this nation, and if this rule change is even attempted at the Republican convention it would create seismic shifts in the U.S. political landscape.

Of course there is still one huge question that I have not even addressed in this article yet.

If Trump has the nomination taken away from him, who would the Republican nominee be?

Some are convinced that it would be Paul Ryan, but I believe that it would be somebody else.

Mitt Romney has certainly not hidden his disdain for Donald Trump, and right now he is quietly waiting in the wings.  If the anti-Trump forces get their way, I believe that he would be the man that ultimately walks away with the prize.

MEN FLOOD TARGET STORES TO FILM TEEN GIRLS AFTER ALLOWING MALES IN FEMALE CHANGING ROOMS

MEN FLOOD TARGET STORES TO FILM TEEN GIRLS AFTER ALLOWING MALES 

IN FEMALE CHANGING ROOMS

BY TIM BROWN

SEE: http://freedomoutpost.com/men-flood-target-to-film-teen-girls-after-allowing-males-in-female-changing-rooms/; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

Retail giant Target has been in the news a lot lately following their transgender bathroom policy and the many crimes occurring in its stores. However, now, it appears the retail outlet is face a wave of men who are snooping on young teen girls and videoing them as they are changing due to the policies of the store allowing men in women's changing rooms.

WDAY reports on one instance in Fargo, North Dakota:

A 16-year-old girl said she was peeped on with a cellphone camera while in a dressing room at the Bismarck Target on Tuesday evening.

The girl told a manager that a man placed a phone under her dressing room door with the camera face up, Bismarck Police said. When she walked out, the man entered a different dressing room.

 The store manager would not comment on the incident as police sought to find the man who was captured by video surveillance.

Another incident occurred in Revere, Massachusetts. NECN reports:

A peeping tom was seen looking at a minor female undressing over the dividing wall in a unisex dressing room of a Target store located at 36 Furlong Dr. in Revere, Massachusetts around 2 p.m. Sunday afternoon.

The suspect is identified as a white male in his late 30s, with brown hair.  He was seen wearing a white colored shirt, and he exited the parking lot in what is believed to be a four door Toyota Prius.

The victim is 17 years old.

Police are also looking for a man who was also seen in video surveillance.

In May, at a Target store in Frisco, Texas, Charles Sidney McKissack III, was apprehended by policeafter allegedly using his cell phone to video an underage girl in the women's dressing room.

"Investigators say the suspect put his cell phone over the wall of a female changing room and shot video of the girl," reported Fox 4.

In April, 33-year-old Joshua Sheldon pled guilty to voyeurism charges in Miami Township, Ohio because he looked under a women's dressing room door at a Target store.

Target's stock has been plunging since a boycott gained steam against them for their transgender bathroom policy. There are dozens of stories that have surfaced since the policy became public that demonstrate that perverts are attempting to have access to America's women and children in Target stores.

However, lest you think you are safe going to a competitor like Wal-Mart, the corporate giant's own bathroom policies are being questioned in light of its transgender policies.

MICHELLE OBAMA'S FATHERS' DAY MESSAGE: "BE BETTER"

MICHELLE OBAMA'S FATHERS' DAY MESSAGE: "BE BETTER" 

BY  LISA DE PASQUALE

SEE: http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2016/06/19/michelle-obamas-fathers-day-message-be-better/; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

Despite what you’re seeing on every cable network, on the cover of every newspaper, and as the lead story on every website, the White House has an important message for women and it isn’t about terrorism and radical Islam. It’s about “gender inequality” in America.

Last week, professional whiners and women’s rights activists (but I repeat myself) gathered in Washington D.C. for the United State of Women Summit. Guest speakers included First Lady Michelle Obama, multi-billionaire Oprah Winfrey, Academy Award-winning actress Patricia Arquette, White House senior advisor Valerie Jarrett and other women who are totally in tune with the struggles of everyday women.

It’s clear that the White House, the media, and others on the Left are living in a bubble. Several months ago I attended a White House event with 50 or so female writers and bloggers. At the event, First Lady Michelle Obama talked about her pet program, Let’s Move. She waxed on about the progress they’ve made by changing nutritional guidelines for school lunches. When it was time to take pre-screened questions, I sat back because I knew my question – Do you believe parents or local schools should have responsibility for setting guidelines rather than the federal government? – would not get me called on by the organizers. One of the questions that did make the cut – Why do we not have a program for physical fitness modeled after Common Core?

Talk to any mother with kids in public schools and the last successful federal program they’ll name is Common Core.

Like most “empowerment” efforts by feminists, the United State of Women Summit quickly became a parade of victimhood and man-bashing. Actress Patricia Arquette continued spreading the myth of the wage gap. Since her scatter-brained speech at the Oscars, she’s been christened an expert on the matter. Deadline reported:

Patricia Arquette, who gave an impassioned speech advocating equal pay for women at the Oscars in 2015, took the summit stage today to note this first White House United State of Women Summit is being held 100 years after women got the right to vote.

…

Last year the Boyhood star, accepting her best supporting-actress Oscar, brought Meryl Streep and others in the hall to their feet in applause, when she said, “To every woman who gave birth to every taxpayer and citizen of this nation, we have fought for everybody else’s equal rights.  “It’s our time to have wage equality once and for all and equal rights for women in the United States of America.”

The wage gap myth has been widely discredited, though Meryl Streep’s impassioned act of pretending to care about the average woman was award-worthy. In fairness, it must be quite annoying to Patricia Arquette that her reported net worth is $24 million and her non-Oscar-winning brother David Arquette is worth $25 million.

The next day, the summit featured Oprah Winfrey interviewing Michelle Obama. Just two average gals! They discussed men’s role in gender equality. The First Lady’s advice to men was simple – “Be better.” She told the audience:

Men can be better husbands, which is — be a part of your family’s life. Do the dishes. Don’t babysit your children. You don’t babysit your own children. Be engaged. Don’t just think going to work and coming home makes you a man. Being a father, being engaged, all that stuff is important. Be a better employer. When you are sitting at a seat of power at a table of any kind and you look around you just see you, it’s just you and a bunch of men around a table, on a golf course, making deals, and you allow that to happen, and you’re OK with that — be better.

What a touching message the week before Father’s Day. Kudos to the First Lady for making me sympathetic toward President Obama.

FBI TOLD OMAR MATEEN'S WIFE NOT TO TELL MEDIA HE WAS GAY

FBI TOLD OMAR MATEEN'S WIFE 

NOT TO TELL MEDIA HE WAS GAY

SEE: http://the-trumpet-online.com/fbi-told-omar-mateens-wife-not-to-tell-the-media-he-was-gay/; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

Sitora Yusufiy – Omar Mateen’s ex-wife

by Danny F. Quest | Jun 17, 2016

In an interview with Brazilian TV, the ex-wife of Omar Mateen claimed the U.S. agency told her to keep quiet about his homosexuality.

The U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation told the former wife of the Orlando shooter Omar Mateen, Sitora Yusufiy, not to speak of his homosexuality or the fact that she, his family and others believed he was gay, Yusufiy’s current fiance, Marco Dias, told a Brazilian TV channel in an interview.

Dias told the Brazilian television station SBT Brazil Tuesday that Yusufiy believed Mateen was gay and that his father called him gay several times in front of her. However, “the FBI asked her not to tell this to the American media.”

Since the attack, Mateen has been dubbed an “Islamic terrorist” by politicians, senior officials and commentators in the U.S. following reports he had pledged allegiance to the Islamic State group.

However, the idea that he could have been a closet-homosexual indicates that the Orlando shooting might have been a deeply felt and personal act of hate.

The FBI and law enforcement in the United States have so far been pursuing the “Islamist terrorism” angle and their alleged demand from Mateen’s ex-wife to keep mum about his homosexuality suggests they want to downplay the personal and self-hating nature of the attack in favor of the Islamic terrorism-related one.

Since his attack on the Pulse gay nightclub in Orlando, the developing narrative surrounding Mateen’s life is that of a troubled human being who had a history of domestic violence, a struggle with his sexual orientation, as well as an inclination toward a radical version of Islam.

However, in addition to recently pledging allegiance to the Islamic State group, Mateen had previously shown support for both al-Qaida and Hezbollah, who have radically different interpretations of Islam and are in fact bitter enemies.

This suggests Mateen had an extremely shallow and confused understanding of Islam as he failed to comprehend the social and political differences between the diferent groups. Hezbollah are currently fighting against the Islamic State and other radical Sunni groups in Syria.

Furthermore, Yusufiy has told the media that her ex-husband started to emotionally and physically abuse her just months into their marriage. She said he exploded in anger and often beat her while also keeping her hostage, which led her family to “literally rescue” her from the abusive relationship and Mateen’s mental instability.

To add to this a former male classmate of Mateen said he had been asked out romantically by the mass shooter, who was reported to be a regular at the Pulse nightclub, having visited it more than a dozen times over the years.

Reports also suggest the attacker used several gay dating apps and communicated with several users. Kevin West, a regular at Pulse, told the Los Angeles Times he had exchanged messages with Mateen on an app.

And now, it seems the overwhelming reports and testimonies pointing to Mateen’s personal motives are forcing the FBI to pursue a different angle.

On Wednesday gay dating apps Jack’d and Grindr said they had been contacted by the FBI as part of the Orlando shooting investigation. They also said they could not provide information on whether Mateen had profiles on those sites as such details are now part of a classified investigation.

A spokesman for dating app Grindr also indicated they have been contacted by authorities. In response to an inquiry from Buzz Feed News, the company announced: “We will continue to cooperate with the authorities and do not comment on ongoing investigations.”

From Freedom’s Phoenix June 18, 2016

ALEX JONES DISSECTS OBAMA'S LIES ON GUN CONTROL FOR AMERICANS, WHILE NOT BLAMING ISLAMIC JIHADISTS

RED ALERT! The REAL Agenda Behind Obama's Gun Control

Published on Jun 17, 2016

"This is the attempted take down of America". Alex Jones breaks down Obama's Call for Gun control following the Orlando Shooting. Meanwhile the Obama Administration continues to arm and fund ISIS-LINKED MILITANTS – WITHOUT BACKGROUND CHECKS!

TAKING GUNS AWAY FROM AMERICANS 

WHILE SUPPLYING ISIS WITH THEM TO INVADE AMERICA

EVERYTHING HE SAYS IS MEANT TO BRAINWASH YOU

We Need Islam Control, Not Gun Control

Ban Radical Islam, Not Guns

PAUL RYAN THREATENS TO SUE DONALD TRUMP IF HE TRIES TO ENACT TEMPORARY BAN ON MUSLIM IMMIGRATION

ANOTHER MUSLIM SYCOPHANT 

LIKE SOUTHERN BAPTIST RUSSELL MOORE

"GOOD CATHOLIC"/ "INVERTEBRATE" 

PAUL RYAN THREATENS SUIT 

TO DEFEND MUSLIMS

FROM: http://freedomoutpost.com/orlando-obamas-tirade-liberalisms-malignancy/; QUOTES:

"Obama also played the “American Values Card,” claiming that moves to limit Muslim immigration or single out Muslims in America as a threat “betrays the very values America stands for.” This was echoed by Republican House speaker and treasonous invertebrate Paul Ryan, who said Tuesday, “I do not think a Muslim ban is in our country’s interest.”

These positions are in keeping with the agenda of international socialist elites in government who have been facilitating Islamic militancy in order to destabilize their nations and necessitate draconian policies in the interest of public safety. In short, their efforts are calculated to bring about a police state. The dogged efforts of the Obama administration in blaming the access Americans have to firearms for this violence is a clear indicator of that strategy. One can only imagine the kind of nation we will have when guns become scarce, Americans are at the mercy of murderous Muslims, and law enforcement is loath to intercede over political correctness – but the prospect is chilling to say the very least."

PAUL RYAN THREATENS TO SUE DONALD TRUMP IF HE TRIES TO ENACT TEMPORARY BAN ON MUSLIM IMMIGRATION 

BY ROBERT SPENCER

SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2016/06/paul-ryan-threatens-to-sue-donald-trump-if-he-tries-to-enact-temporary-ban-on-muslim-immigration; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

Paul Ryan and the Republican establishment seem determined to do two things: to elect Hillary Clinton President of the United States this November, and to make sure that nothing impedes the huge influx of Muslim migrants into the U.S.

Yet San Bernardino shooter Tashfeen Malik had passed five separate background checks from five separate US government agencies. Ahmad al-Mohammed and one other of the jihadis who murdered 130 people in Paris in November 2015 had just entered Europe as refugees. In February 2015, the Islamic State boasted it would soon flood Europe with as many as 500,000 refugees. And the Lebanese Education Minister said in September 2015 that there were 20,000 jihadis among the refugees in camps in his country.

Meanwhile, 80% of migrants who have come to Europe claiming to be fleeing the war in Syria aren’t really from Syria at all. So why are they claiming to be Syrian and streaming into Europe, and now the U.S. as well? An Islamic State operative gave the answer when he boasted in September 2015, shortly after the migrant influx began, that among the flood of refugees, 4,000 Islamic State jihadis had already entered Europe. He explained their purpose: “It’s our dream that there should be a caliphate not only in Syria but in all the world, and we will have it soon, inshallah.” These Muslims were going to Europe in the service of that caliphate: “They are going like refugees,” he said, but they were going with the plan of sowing blood and mayhem on European streets. As he told this to journalists, he smiled and said, “Just wait.”

Paul Ryan doesn’t care. He only cares that the bipartisan politically correct establishment retains its power.

“Paul Ryan says he might sue Donald Trump if he tried to enact the Muslim ban,” by Allan Smith, Business Insider, June 17, 2016:

Paul Ryan considers Donald Trump’s proposal to indefinitely ban Muslim immigration into the US to be executive overreach.

And during an interview with The Huffington Post, uploaded on Friday, the House speaker said he’d “sue any president that exceeds his or her powers.”

Ryan, who said Trump supported the separation of powers when the speaker endorsed the presumptive Republican nominee, released part of his agenda regarding executive overreach this week.

However, Ryan is not totally sure if Trump enacting a ban on Muslims entering the country would be outside of presidential authority.

“That’s a legal question that there’s a good debate about,” Ryan said, pointing to the 1952 Immigration and Nationality Act. That act was meant to exclude immigrants from certain countries from coming to the US in the aftermath of World War II.

On Monday, Trump made the appeal that he could legally enact such a ban as president.

“The immigration laws of the United States give the president powers to suspend entry into the country of any class of persons,” he said at a rally. “I will suspend immigration from areas of the world where there is a proven history of terrorism against the United States, Europe or our allies, until we fully understand how to end these threats.”…

U.S. SENATE VOTES TO REQUIRE WOMEN TO REGISTER FOR THE DRAFT

U.S. SENATE VOTES TO REQUIRE WOMEN TO REGISTER FOR THE DRAFT

BY TIM BROWN

SEE: http://freedomoutpost.com/us-senate-votes-to-require-women-to-register-for-the-draft/; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

As I have written about previously, the draft by the central government of the united States of America is not only unconstitutional, but it is morally and biblically a violation of the freedom and liberty that the men and women of this country possess. Yet, the US Senate has recently voted to demand that women register for the draft.

The New York Times reports:

On Tuesday, the Senate approved an expansive military policy bill that would for the first time require young women to register for the draft. The shift, while fiercely opposed by some conservative lawmakers and interest groups, had surprisingly broad support among Republican leaders and women in both parties.

The United States has not used the draft since 1973 during the Vietnam War. But the impact of such a shift, reflecting the evolving role of women in the armed services, would likely be profound.

 Under the Senate bill passed on Tuesday, women turning 18 on or after Jan. 1, 2018, would be forced to register for Selective Service, as men must do now. Failure to register could result in the loss of various forms of federal aid, including Pell grants, a penalty that men already face. Because the policy would not apply to women who turned 18 before 2018, it would not affect current aid arrangements.

"The fact is," said Senator John McCain, Republican of Arizona and the chairman of the Armed Services Committee, "every single leader in this country, both men and women, members of the military leadership, believe that it's fair since we opened up all aspects of the military to women that they would also be registering for Selective Services."

Sadly, many men and women have abandoned the biblical principles our nation was first founded upon, namely the differences and roles of men and women. While the Supreme Court ruled in 1981 that women did not have to register for the draft so that they would not have to face the same requirements as men, the Obama administration has been advancing an assault on women since Defense Secretary Ashton Carter would open combat jobs to woman.

Here's the root problem in this particular issue: the drafting of men into military service is wrong. It's doubly wrong to draft women. It's even worse when the central government is doing it to support unconstitutional wars, which they have been doing following World War II.

"It's my personal view, every American who's physically qualified should register for the draft," said General Robert B. Neller, commandant of the Marine Corp.

Well, we appreciate the treasonous general's "personal view," but the Constitution specifically states in the Thirteenth Amendment:

Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.

This would include the illegal and immoral draft for both men and women.

The Bible is also clear about what god considers moral with regards to an army.

When Israel went to war, here were the stipulations that God put down for those who would engage in battle. The come from Deuteronomy 20.

"When you go out to battle against your enemies, and see horses and chariots and people more numerous than you, do not be afraid of them; for the Lord your God is with you, who brought you up from the land of Egypt.  So it shall be, when you are on the verge of battle, that the priest shall approach and speak to the people.  And he shall say to them, 'Hear, O Israel:  Today you are on the verge of battle with your enemies.  Do not let your heart faint, do not be afraid, and do not tremble or be terrified because of them; for the Lord is He who goes with you, to fight for you against your enemies, to save you." Deut. 20:1-4

The next section points out those who should return home rather than be a part of the militia.

"Then the officers shall speak to the people, saying, 'What man is there who has built a new house and has not dedicated it?  Let him go and return to his house, lest he die in the battle and another man dedicate it.  And also what man is there who has planted a vineyard and has not eaten of it?  Let him go and return to his house, lest he die in the battle and another man eat of it.  And what man is there who is betrothed to a woman and has not married her?  Let him go and return to his house, lest he die in the battle and another man marry her.'" Deut. 20:5-7

It even includes those who are cowards.

"The officers shall speak further to the people and say, 'What man is there who is fearful and fainthearted?  Let him go and return to his house, lest the heart of his brethren faint like his heart.'  And so it shall be, when the officers have finished speaking to the people, that they shall make captains of the armies to lead the people." Deut. 20:8-9

The pretended law that requires men to sign up for the draft in clear violation of the Constitution has been upheld by the Supreme Court in 1981. This is par for a Supreme Court that has shown itself to be unconstitutional in its rulings time and again.

The issue here is really based on a free society, not one that enslaves its citizens for a war machine.

OBAMA HIRES RACIST MUSLIM WOMAN LAILA ALAWA FOR DHS RIGHT AFTER ORLANDO MASSACRE

OBAMA HIRES RACIST 

LAILA ALAWA

Muslim who said 9/11 “changed the world for good” is on Homeland Security Advisory Council

BY ROBERT SPENCER

SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2016/06/muslim-who-said-911-changed-the-world-for-good-is-on-homeland-security-advisory-council;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

How by any stretch of anyone’s imagination can Laila Alawa be seen as someone who cares in the slightest degree about “homeland security”? She is quite obviously on the other side, and if we had a sane political and media culture, her presence on the DHS Advisory Council would be a major scandal.

“Syrian Immigrant Who Said 9/11 ‘Changed The World For Good’ Is A Homeland Security Adviser,” by Peter Hasson, Daily Caller, June 13, 2016:



One of the sitting members on the Homeland Security Advisory Council’s (HSAC) Subcommittee on Countering Violent Extremism is a 25-year-old immigrant of Syrian heritage who said that the 9/11 attacks “changed the world for good” and has consistently disparaged America, free speech and white people on social media.

Laila Alawa was one of just 15 people tapped to serve on the newly-formed HSAC Subcommittee on Countering Violent Extremism in 2015 — the same year she became an American citizen. Just last week, the subcommittee submitted a report to Department of Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson, recommending that the DHS avoid using Muslim terminology like the words “sharia” and “jihad” when discussing terrorism. 

Alawa says she immigrated into the U.S. when she was ten years old. Her family had already left Syria by the time she was born. “But I will always be Syrian. I will always be from Syria. I will always be of Syria,” she wrote in November 2015, calling the country her “homeland.”


In 2014, Alawa commemorated the September 11 attacks by tweeting that “9/11 changed the world for good, and there’s no other way to say it.”

Exactly a year later, she claimed that, after September 11, “Being American meant you were white.”

In April 2013, she responded to a tweet from activist Pamela Geller who called the Boston Marathon bombings “jihad” by tweeting: “go fuck yourself.”

On September 21 — the day after Secretary of State John Kerry announced that the U.S. would accept 85,000 Syrian refugees in 2016 and 100,000 more in 2017 — Alawa mocked the “Salty white tears all over my newsfeed.”

In the Countering Violent Extremism report published last week, Alawa and her fellow subcommittee members recommended that the Department of Homeland Security “adapt to the changing nature of violent extremism itself” by devoting more attention to “anarchists, sovereign citizens, white-supremacists, and others.”

The report also recommended that, in order to combat violent extremism, the DHS “Focus on gender diversity of youth through careful attention to the range of push and pull factors that attract individuals of differing gender.”

As originally reported by The Daily Caller, the subcommittee Alawa serves on instructed the DHS to begin “using American English instead of religious, legal and cultural terms like ‘jihad,’ ‘sharia,’ ‘takfir‘ or ‘umma‘” when discussing terrorism in order to avoid offending Muslims.

Two months before Secretary Johnson created the Subcommittee on Combatting Violent Extremism, Alawa tweeted: “THE US HAS NEVER BEEN A UTOPIA UNLESS YOU WERE A STRAIGHT WHITE MALE THAT OWNED LAND. straight up period go home shut up.”

She has previously indicated her belief that only “idiots” believe that “America is the best nation in the world.”

In September 2014, a week after saying that “9/11 changed the world for good,” Alawa said that “9/11 is your day to pull out your flag themed clothing, and my day to look behind my back as I walk home.”

Alawa is outspoken in her belief that “Islamophobic” rhetoric shouldn’t be allowed.

“We are living in a country that deems it ‘freedom of speech’ to spew absolutely hateful ish about Muslims. That’s not freedom of speech,” she tweeted.

Less than two weeks after the Boston Bombings, Alawa tweeted: “You can’t say something intolerant and not expect consequences. Not on my watch.” In April 2015, Alawa asked: “How the hell is the shit @PamelaGeller is spewing ‘free speech’? it’s straight up warmongering hate speech. It’s xenophobia.’”…

______________________________________________________________________ 

Racist advises Homeland Security on relations with Islam

BY MARTIN BARILLAS

SEE: http://www.speroforum.com/a/PWNUZHYUIE27/78205-Racist-advises-Homeland-Security-on-relations-with-Islam; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

Laila Alawa, who sat on the Homeland Security Advisory Council’s (HSAC) Subcommittee on Countering Violent Extremism, once wrote that 9/11 terrorist attacks “changed the world for good. I just hope we keep having open conversations about our differences.” A week afterwards, according to the Daily Caller, she said, “9/11 is your day to pull out your flag themed clothing, and my day to look behind my back as I walk home.” The 24-year-old Muslim woman has variously denounced the United States, the right to free speech and white people. She emigrated to the United States as a pre-teen.

9/11 changed the world for good, and there's no other way to say it. I just hope we keep having open conversations about our differences.

— Laila Alawa (@lulainlife) September 11, 2014

Not long before Department of Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson created the Subcommittee, according to Daily Caller, Alawa wrote on Twitter: “THE US HAS NEVER BEEN A UTOPIA UNLESS YOU WERE A STRAIGHT WHITE MALE THAT OWNED LAND. straight up period go home shut up.” For Alawa, only “idiots” still believe that “America is the best nation in the world.” 

Being Muslim in America after 9/11 means giving up your childhood. It means staying extra happy even if you aren't so the feds don't come.

— Laila Alawa (@lulainlife) September 11, 2014

Alawa is one of 15 people who serve the HSAC Subcommittee, which was established by the Obama administration in 2015. It was that year that Alawa became a citizen of the United States. Recently, the subcommittee submitted a report to Secretary Johnson that recommended that it cease using Muslim terminology like the words “sharia” and “jihad” when discussing terrorism. Alawa says she has never been actually employed by the Department of Homeland Security. She is founder of The Tempest, a website that bills itself as a mouthpiece for "millenial" young women. A recent article written by Alawa is entitled, "I used to pee when I laughed: this changed everything."

Besides the Homeland Security Advisory Council, DHS has a "Countering Violent Extremism Task Force" which also advises Secretary Johnson. The two bodies are distinct.

Alawa’s ethnic and religious roots are deep. Despite her American citizenship, according to Daily Caller, Alawa wrote in November 2015 “But I will always be Syrian. I will always be from Syria. I will always be of Syria.”

I might be half white, but I'm proud of my differences. I'm Muslim American. That's who I am, nothing more, nothing less. #waronpeace

— Laila Alawa (@lulainlife) September 17, 2014

She commemorated the deadly 9/11 attacks in 2014 with a post on Twitter, saying:  “9/11 changed the world for good, and there’s no other way to say it.” Then, a year later, she claimed that after September 11, “Being American meant you were white.” When activist Pamela Geller labeled the Boston Marathon bombings as “jihad,” Alawa responded on Twitter: “go f--k yourself.”

I put on the hijab the year 9/11 happened. 9/11's experience of being alienated + scrutinized taught me to keep fighting. #waronpeace

— Laila Alawa (@lulainlife) September 17, 2014

Alawa further revealed her racial animosity on September 21 of last year when Secretary of State John Kerry announced that America will take in 185,000 Syrian refugees, when she mocked the “Salty white tears all over my newsfeed.”

I don't need your white woman tears to define my identity. I am a proud Muslim American feminist.#waronpeace

— Laila Alawa (@lulainlife) September 17, 2014

In their report to DHS Sec. Johnson, Alawa joined her fellow subcommittee members to recommend that Homeland Security should “adapt to the changing nature of violent extremism itself” by devoting more attention to “anarchists, sovereign citizens, white-supremacists, and others.” Moving on, the Report on Countering Extremism recommended that DHS should “Focus on gender diversity of youth through careful attention to the range of push and pull factors that attract individuals of differing gender.”

In a 2014 tweet, Alawa wrote that while 9/11 was "horrific," Muslim American's "pain" has made them into survivors.

Here's the thing: 9/11 was horrific. But the pain we've been through as Muslim Americans has made us into survivors. #waronpeace

— Laila Alawa (@lulainlife) September 17, 2014

DHS should not offend Muslims, the subcommittee wrote, which called on DHS to use “American English instead of religious, legal and cultural terms like ‘jihad,’ ‘sharia,’ ‘takfir‘ or ‘umma‘” when discussing terrorism.

Funny thing about all these white idiots complaining about Diwali on @Snapchat is that POC outnumber them 100 to 1. #YourRacismIsShowing

— Laila Alawa (@lulainlife) October 23, 2014

Moreover, Alawa wants to ban “Islamophobic” speech. “We are living in a country that deems it ‘freedom of speech’ to spew absolutely hateful rubbish about Muslims. That’s not freedom of speech,” she wrote. 

@lulainlife I'm sure u and I don't agree on many things but I think you've been unfairly targeted based on what I've seen. Have a grest day

— Blair Anton (@blairanton) June 16, 2016

In an interview with Spero News, Attorney Jennifer R. Breedon said that groups such as the Council on American Islamic Relations and the Muslim Brotherhood seek to squelch freedom of speech in order to advance Islamic political goals such as shariah.