Translate

Tuesday, May 12, 2015

EXTRA BIBLICAL SCOTT WALKER'S EXPOSITORY PREACHING FROM NEW AGE CHANNELED "JESUS CALLING" BOOK DUPES FOLLOWERS WITH "LESSON" HE LEARNED FROM IT

USING NEW AGE MYSTICISM IN POLITICS?
IS HE FOR REAL?
"JESUS CALLING" JUST ISN'T AN APOCRYPHAL BOOK OF THE BIBLE IN THE CATHOLIC MANNER. BUT THEN AGAIN, RAISED AS A LIBERAL BAPTIST HE WOULDN'T FIND ANYTHING WRONG WITH CATHOLICISM, WOULD HE?
A LESSON LEARNED, BUT NOT FROM THE BIBLE:
Jesus is Calling Scott Walker
SON OF A LIBERAL AMERICAN BAPTIST PREACHER & 
IOWA'S "FAITH & FREEDOM" EVENT
SCOTT WALKER WRAPS HIMSELF IN THE FLAG, BUT NOT THE BIBLE; 
PREACHES FROM NEW AGE CHANNELED BOOK

Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker reads from "Jesus Calling," a devotional book, during the Iowa Faith & Freedom Coalition event for potential 2016 Republican presidential contenders at the Point of Grace Church in Waukee, Iowa, April 25, 2015. Nine declared or likely Republican candidates descended on a large church in Iowa on Saturday to court evangelical Christians.
WHAT? ANOTHER "ALLEGED" CHRISTIAN REPUBLICAN FOR PRESIDENT?
SEE: http://www.twincities.com/politics/ci_28029266/; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

DES MOINES, Iowa -- Scott Walker, the son of a Baptist preacher, learned a lot about being a politician by going to church.
He was introduced to glad-handing while greeting worshippers beside his father after Sunday services. His confidence as a public speaker began at 2, when he delivered a Christmas greeting from the pulpit, and it blossomed when he preached occasional sermons as a teenager. And now, Walker's lifelong church involvement may be a powerful asset as he positions himself to run for the Republican presidential nomination and focuses on early primary and caucus states dominated by evangelical voters.
Already a hero to fiscal conservatives -- both the Tea Party base and billionaire donors like Charles G. and David H. Koch -- Walker, the governor of Wisconsin, planned to make his most explicit appeal yet to the Christian right last week before hundreds of social conservatives in Iowa. His implicit message is that in an unusually fractured Republican field, with 10 or more candidates potentially on the ballot in the Iowa caucuses next year, he is best positioned to unite the party.
Ahead of Saturday's candidate event -- organized by the Iowa Faith and Freedom Coalition, part of the national group led by the religious activist Ralph Reed -- Walker hardened his positions on issues considered litmus tests for social conservatives, including abortion and immigration. He suggested in an interview with Glenn Beck on Monday that there are too many legal immigrants, a position to the right of other 2016 hopefuls.
But it is Walker's biography that could make him especially attractive to Christian conservatives. A life story that began in the Baptist churches his father led in Colorado, Iowa and Wisconsin continues today at the nondenominational evangelical church he attends in his hometown, Wauwatosa, Wis.
"My relationship with God drives every major decision in my life," Walker said in an emailed statement. While that relationship does not direct his daily decisions, he said, "our walk of faith helps us prepare for those decisions and provides us comfort as we seek to do God's will."
During his political rise in Wisconsin, Walker did not often emphasize his faith. But evangelicals make up nearly 60 percent of Republican caucus-goers in Iowa. They are an important factor in Southern primaries. And they continue to have an outsize influence on the Republican nominating process.
While he was raised a dutiful "P.K.," or pastor's kid, Walker's spiritual journey has not been without conflict. Over the years, his political views have sometimes made him a source of controversy in the places where he has worshipped.
Walker's father, the Rev. Llewellyn S. Walker, was a minister in the American Baptist Churches USA, a more pluralistic denomination than the conservative and better-known Southern Baptist Convention. Pastor Llew, as he was known, is a Republican, but politics and the social causes of the day did not animate his First Baptist Church in Delavan, Wis., where Walker lived from age 10 until he left for college. His father was foremost "a caregiver to the congregation," said the church's current pastor, the Rev. Michael Ida. He would spend half a day sitting in the hospital room of an ailing church member, praying and shooting the breeze.
Before the elder Walker retired in 1995, at the age of 56, he struggled with depression, Ida said. His wife, Pat, and the teenage Scott Walker shouldered some of his pastoral duties.
"There were Sundays when Scott would preach the sermon," Ida said.
As an adult, Walker moved to Wauwatosa, a Milwaukee suburb, in search of a Republican-leaning district in which to run for the state Assembly. He and his wife, Tonette, joined another American Baptist congregation, Underwood Memorial Baptist Church, which had a history of social activism.
A dozen years later, in 2005, Underwood voted to affiliate with the Association of Welcoming and Affirming Baptists, a gay-accepting national group, and a small rainbow flag was affixed to its signboard. (The hiring of a woman as pastor in 2003 had accelerated its progressive tilt.)
Walker, by then a candidate for governor, left the church.
"Tonette said they were looking for a more family-friendly place," said Marilyn Carrington, a longtime member.
Some members believed he had cut ties because of Underwood's liberal drift.
"As soon as we put the flag on the sign, he was out of there," said Kevin Genich, a former church member who knew Walker.
After a campaign event in Iowa last week, Walker deflected a question about whether he had left Underwood because it openly embraced gay members. He said there were few children the ages of his sons there.
"Ultimately, we wanted to go to a place where our kids would have the ability to interact with other kids," he said.
Walker's parents, who in retirement had moved to be near their son and joined Underwood, had no objections. They continue to worship there.
Meadowbrook Church, where Walker now worships, is politically and theologically conservative. It is accepted among the church's clergy and congregation that the Bible is the word of God, "without error," and that Christ's return is "imminent." It is led by a council of elders that is open only to men.
While the Rev. Jamie Washam, the pastor of Underwood, opposed a Wisconsin ballot measure to ban same-sex marriage in 2006, Meadowbrook's pastor urged members to vote to define marriage as between one man and one woman.
"The church cannot recognize any alternative arrangements as being God's will for any persons or society," the pastor, John Mackett, wrote on a church blog.
At the same time, Meadowbrook is not politically active on issues like abortion. Sermons hew close to Bible readings.
Mackett, who stepped down as pastor last year, said he had often received text messages from Walker on a Monday discussing his sermon.
"It was never a trite remark," he said. "It came out of a thoughtful reflection on something that was said or happened in church."
Describing the governor as "a very disciplined man," he said Walker followed a morning routine that included exercise, prayer and Bible study. Before being elected governor, Walker and his wife met with other couples for Bible study Sunday evenings in their home.
"Scott's seeking God is a 24/7 thing," said Mackett's wife, Betsy. "It's not just checking a box on Sunday."
But Meadowbrook did not escape the political convulsions touched off during Walker's first term as governor. In a speech to the congregation during its annual meeting in 2013, Mackett pleaded for an end to the "turmoil" caused by "slander" and "name calling" among members divided by politics.
He declined to elaborate in an interview. But Lee Heyward, who succeeded Mackett as head pastor, said, "John and Meadowbrook were going through a really tumultuous time during that whole season of Act 10," referring to the law Walker signed in 2011 that stripped Wisconsin's public employees of most bargaining rights.
The church has many members who are teachers, Heyward said, and they vociferously opposed the governor.
"There were people in the church that wanted John to come out and speak against Gov. Walker and his policies," Heyward said.
There also were supporters of the governor who wanted to hear their pastor defend him. Mackett refused to introduce politics into his sermons. Some people on both sides left Meadowbrook.
Walker said that when tens of thousands of protesters filled the state Capitol during the debate over Act 10, "my faith helped me stay calm and focus on the issue instead of matching anger with anger."
On Friday, as he began his two-day visit to Iowa, Walker indulged in the venerable political tradition of playing up his ties to the state with the nation's first nominating contest. In his case, the ties are genuine, dating to his grade-school years, when his father was a pastor in rural Plainfield. He remembered a tire rolling off his grandparents' car in Dubuque and visiting a Happy Chef restaurant.
In recalling the crucible of his political narrative, his fight against unions, Walker thanked Iowans for their moral support.
"So many of you just prayed for us," he said.
It is a line he hopes will convince evangelical voters that they speak a common language.
______________________________________________________________

“Jesus Calling” Book Sales Soar 

After Walker Speech at Iowa Faith Summit


Things Jesus our Savior never said, but the false spirit of “Jesus Calling” did:
"When the path before you is dotted with difficulties, beware of measuring your strength against those challenges. Without Me, you will not make it past the first hurdle."
Hat tip to Warren B. Smith for alerting me to this. Warren has written the book,Another Jesus Calling, and exposed Thomas Nelson Publishing for trying to cover up the New Age verbiage from Sarah Young’s original book.
Newsmax has the story of presidential hopeful and Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker’s extensive quoting of this problematic, theological train wreck of a book. The gov is a nice guy, but let’s hope someone close to him enlightens him about the spiritual dangers of quoting a false Jesus:
Sales of a Christian devotional book have spiked since Republican Gov. Scott Walker of Wisconsin read excerpts from it during his speech at the Iowa Faith & Freedom Coalition last Saturday.
Walker, who is considering a 2016 White House run, read from Jesus Calling: Enjoying Peace in His Presence,” which was written in the first-person voice of Jesus by author Sarah Young.
Young is a former missionary to Australia and other countries, Religion News Service reports. The book was published in 2004 by Thomas Nelson Publishers Inc., a division of HarperCollins.
In his speech to about 1,000 evangelical Republicans at the Point of Grace Church just outside Des Moines, Walker read from the book’s entry on June 4, the date of his Wisconsin recall election in 2012. He had read the entry several days after winning the election — Walker said he had been too busy with the recall that day — and a friend had sent him the item in an email.
“‘Welcome challenging times as an opportunity to trust me,'” Walker began. “‘You have me beside you and the spirit within you, so no set of circumstances is too difficult for you to handle.
“‘When the path before you is dotted with difficulties, beware of measuring your strength against those challenges,'” Walker continued. “‘Without me, you will not make it past the first hurdle.
“‘The way to walk through demanding days is to grip my hand tightly and stay in close communication with me,'” he read. “‘Regardless of the day’s problems, I can keep you in perfect peace as you stay close to me.'”
Reading the entry just days after becoming the only governor in the nation’s history to survive a recall, Walker told the Iowa crowd that, “It made me realize at that moment that the best time to minister is to accept God’s calling at the time when you least expect it.”
That, he said, led to his initial decision to run for governor in 2009 — and is fueling whether he might enter the race for the GOP presidential nomination.
Within days after Walker’s speech, “Jesus Calling” rose to No. 1 on several online book lists, including Amazon, RNS reports.
According to Publishers Weekly, the book has now sold 14 million copies in its many forms — calendar, smartphone app, children’s book — since it was first published.
“It’s a franchise,” Marcia Nelson, the magazine’s former religion reviews editor, told RNS.
“Jesus Calling” sold about 59,000 copies in its first few years, largely via word of mouth, according to RNS. It outsold “Fifty Shades of Grey” in the first half of 2013 — and was No. 1 on PW’s list by August.
It has consistently remained among the top three books on the list.
“‘Jesus Calling’ didn’t need Scott Walker to get a bump,” Nelson told RNS. “Christian publishing has had a massive hit on its hands ever since ‘Jesus Calling’ was published in 2004.”
Phyllis Tickle, a former PW religion editor, said that she could not remember another book — religion or not — being read in public by another presidential hopeful.
“Candidates will cite books,” Tickle told RNS, “but not like this.”
_________________________________________________________________
EXCERPT: "As he stood in front of the audience, Walker read an entry from the devotional — which was written in the first-person voice of Christ — from June 4, which was the day in 2012 that he won the recall election in Wisconsin, according to NewsMax.
Here’s the portion of the “Jesus Calling” text that he read just before telling the audience that the book taught him an important lesson about accepting God’s calling at the most unexpected of times:
“‘Welcome challenging times as an opportunity to trust me. You have me beside you and the spirit within you, so no set of circumstances is too difficult for you to handle.
When the path before you is dotted with difficulties, beware of measuring your strength against those challenges. Without me, you will not make it past the first hurdle.
The way to walk through demanding days is to grip my hand tightly and stay in close communication with me. Regardless of the day’s problems, I can keep you in perfect peace as you stay close to me.”"
_______________________________________________________

Scott Walker plugs a Jesus devotional 

in a not-so-subtle sign to evangelicals

EXCERPT:
"Standing before more than 1,000 people at the Iowa Faith & Freedom Coalition, the Wisconsin governor used part of his time to read from “Jesus Calling: Enjoying Peace in His Presence,” a Christian devotional written in the first-person voice of Jesus by missionary-turned-author Sarah Young." (And New Age heretic).
_________________________________________________________________
LIGHTHOUSE TRAILS RESEARCH ARCHIVE ABOUT "THE JESUS CALLING" & SARAH YOUNG:
New Age Implications: Ten Examples
1) The New Age Book God Calling-"In an interview with the Christian Broadcasting Network, Sarah Young said she was inspired to receive “messages” from “Jesus” after reading the book God Calling. She stated:
"My journey began with a devotional book (God Calling) written in the 1930s by two women who practiced waiting in God’s Presence, writing the messages they received as they “listened.” About a year after I started reading this book, I began to wonder if I too could receive messages during my times of communing with God. . . . So I decided to “listen” to God with pen in hand, writing down whatever I sensed He was saying."
 2) Channeled “Messages” from “Jesus”-"In Jesus Calling, Young writes that “Jesus” told her “to be a channel of My loving Presence.”9 Obliging his request, her book is filled with channeled “messages” and “directives” she claims to have received from God. In her original introduction, she wrote:
I have continued to receive personal messages from God as I meditate on Him. The more difficult my life circumstances, the more I need these encouraging directives from my Creator."
 3) Visualization-"Sarah Young engaged in the occult/New Age practice of “visualization” when she “pictured” her family “encircled by God’s protective Presence.” “Visualization” and “guided imagery” have long been recognized by sorcerers of all kinds as the most powerful and effective methodology for contacting the spirit world in order to acquire supernatural power, knowledge, and healing. Such methods are neither taught nor practiced in the Bible as helps to faith or prayer."
4) Meditation-"Jesus Calling readers are led to equate Sarah Young’s contemplative prayer process with biblical meditation. But to “make your mind like a still pool of water” as you passively wait “to receive whatever thoughts” Young’s “Jesus” may “drop into it” is much more akin to Eastern/New Age meditation." 
5) New Age Terminology-"Throughout Jesus Calling, Sarah Young’s “Jesus” casually introduces New Age terminology in his channeled messages." 
6) Divine Alchemy-"By Googling divine alchemy on the Internet, one will see countless references to the occult. The term divine alchemy is frequently found in the teachings of New Age leaders such as Marianne Williamson. She uses the term divine alchemy to reference the same practice of meditation Sarah Young’s “Jesus” is advocating. She writes:
"Meditation is time spent with God in silence and quiet listening. It is the time during which the Holy Spirit has a chance to enter into our minds and perform His divine alchemy.""
 7) Co-creation-"Sarah Young’s “Jesus” also introduces the key New Age concept of “co-creation.” This is a New Age evolutionary concept that falsely teaches that because man is God, he can therefore co-create with God. But man is not God.
The New Age “Christ” has a plan. He is promising the world that Armageddon can be avoided and world peace can be achieved if everyone collaborates and “co-creates” with him." 
8) God’s Dream; Deceptive Scheme-"The term “God’s Dream” is yet another part of the overlapping New Age language streaming into the church. God’s Dream is a vague, loosely defined New Age metaphor that attempts to unify different religions and faith groups in an unbiblical effort to attain world peace." 
9) God “in” Everything-"The New Age teaches we are all “One” and we are all “God” because God is “in” everyone and everything. This belief is referred to as panentheism and is the foundational teaching of the New Age movement."
10) Sarah Young’s New Agey Mystical Moonlight Conversion-"In the original introduction to Jesus Calling, Sarah Young described how it was a walk in “God’s glorious creation” that led to her mystical moonlight conversion—that her “heart” was “converted” to “Jesus” when she “felt” “enveloped” by the “warm mist” of His “Presence.” But after nine years of publishing the mystical conversion account above, this original account has been suddenly replaced by a different, more traditional conversion account that Young now claims to have had prior to her moonlight walk. Instead of “God’s glorious creation” transitioning into her mystical moonlight conversion, now it’s her new conversion account that transitions into her considerably toned down walk in the moonlight."
Changing “Jesus Calling”—Damage Control for a False Christ by Warren B. Smith is our newest Lighthouse Trails Print Booklet Tract. 
Five  Problems:
(1) Jesus Calling was inspired by a channeled New Age book
(2) Sarah Young originally wrote that she “received messages” from “Jesus” Himself  
3) Sarah Young’s “Jesus” contradicts the Bible’s true Jesus Christ
4) Sarah Young’s “Jesus” stated that Abraham was guilty of  “idolatry” and “son-worship”
(5) “Jesus” complains about the night of his birth
_______________________________________________________

ANOTHER ACT FIRST, THINK LATER CANDIDATE?

Scott Walker’s New Immigration Positions Criticized By Top Conservatives

EXCERPT:
In 2013, Walker said that he thought it “made sense” to enact a comprehensive reform plan that that would allow undocumented residents a path to citizenship after paying penalties. Critics call this “amnesty,” though the term is incorrect (it’s alternate punishment, not a pardon). At the time, many of Walker’s colleagues supported such a plan. In March of 2015, Walker admitted that he’d changed his position entirely: he no longer supports a path to citizenship for immigrants who have violated immigration law. 
_______________________________________________________________

PERVERTED LOVE FEST NORMALIZES SODOMY AHEAD OF SUPREME COURT: GAY ELTON JOHN & HUSBAND JOIN WITH ECSTATIC RICK WARREN & SENATORS AT CAPITOL AIDS RECEPTION

THE LIARS OF GAY PROPAGANDA 
HAVE A "GAY" TIME 
A DISGUSTING WHITEWASH OF WHAT USED TO BE CALLED PERVERSION & GROSS SIN, WITH "AMERICA'S 'PASTOR'", RICK WARREN GLEEFUL
LIBERAL POLITICAL CORRECTNESS; A SLAP AT CHRISTIANS 
JUST BEFORE SUPREME COURT RULING ON GAY MARRIAGE
THIS WILL ONLY INCREASE 
CHRISTIAN PERSECUTION

TRAITORS REJECTING AMERICA'S CHRISTIAN HERITAGE FOR EXPEDIENCE

(L-R) David Furnish, U.S. Sen. John McCain (R-AZ), U.S. Sen. Patrick Leahey (D-VT), U.S. Sen. Kelly Ayotte (R-NH), Sir Elton John, Founder, Elton John AIDS Foundation, Ronald Perelman, U.S. Sen. Lindsay Graham (R-SC) and U.S. Sen. Chris Coons (D-DE) pose for a photo before an Elton John AIDS Foundation and The ONE Campaign hosted reception on global HIV/AIDS funding at the U.S. Capitol Visitor Center on May 5, 2015 in Washington, DC.
ELTON JOHN WITH DELAWARE SENATOR CHRIS COONS (D)
Elton John AIDS Foundation and The ONE Campaign Host Reception on Global HIV/AIDS Funding


ELTON JOHN WITH "HUSBAND" DAVID FURNISH
______________________________________________________

COMMUNICABLE EFFECTS?

Feel the Love Tonight? 

Rick Warren, Elton John Hold Hands, 

Joke About Kissing Before AIDS Panel

by Heather Clark

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

WASHINGTON — Controversial megachurch leader and author Rick Warren raised concerns Wednesday after joining hands with homosexual singer Elton John during a speech before a congressional hearing on AIDS funding, and joked what would happen if the two kissed.
“It would be the kiss heard ’round the world,” he said.
Photographs show the two raising their hands as they sat down to the witness table and laughing as Warren issued the caution to John. The incident drew concerns from Christians across the country.
“Elton John, the man who has worn more wigs and dresses than Marilyn Monroe, we expect this from. But Rick Warren claims to be a minister of the gospel of Jesus Christ,” wrote Geoffrey Grider of Now the End Begins.
“Here was his perfect opportunity to lovingly and graciously tell not only Elton John, but all of Congress, that without being born again they will die and go to a Devil’s Hell. But instead, he holds hands with a gay man, and jokes about kissing him,” he said.
Warren, the leader of the nearly 20,000 member Saddleback Church, is known for his best-selling book “The Purpose Driven Life.” Elton John, a world-renowned singer recognized for his hits “Candle in the Wind,” “Rocket Man” and “Can You Feel the Love Tonight?” from the film “The Lion King,” is also known for his same-sex “marriage” to his partner David Furnish.
Warren, who believes that homosexual behavior is sinful, has raised concerns in the past for other statements made about homosexuality, including omitting any instruction that men must repent of homosexual behavior in order to be saved.
As previously reported, in 2012, during an interview with the Huffington Post, Marc Lamont Hill asked Warren if he believes homosexuals will go to Hell. Warren replied that they will not.
“No, not because they’re gay,” he said. “We go to Hell because we choose to reject the grace of God.”
When Hill asked what happens to a homosexual that accepts Jesus, Warren responded enthusiastically.
“He’s going to Heaven!” he declared. “Without a doubt.”
Warren has also expressed remorse for making a video in support of California’s Proposition 8, which sought to enshrine marriage as being between a man and a woman, because it was seen as his admonition to the nation.
“I learned that anything I say now privately is now public. And I actually learned from that mistake of going, ‘Oh, wait a minute, everybody took that like I was pontificating to the whole world,'” he said.
“I would not have [done it again],” Warren stated. “I would not have made that statement. I wanted to talk to my own people as a duty, because as a shepherd, I’m responsible for those who put themselves under my care. I’m not responsible for everybody else. I am responsible for the people who choose to be under my care and ask me a question.”
Concerns have additionally been raised over Warren’s call for Christians to unite with Roman Catholics, as he appeared at the Vatican last fall to speak at an interfaith conference on the “Complementarity of Man and Woman.”
“We have far more in common than what divides us,” he said in a video released by the Catholic News Service.
_____________________________________________________________


Monday, May 11, 2015

JOHN WHITEHEAD: TURNING AMERICA INTO A BATTLEFIELD: A BLUEPRINT FOR LOCKING DOWN THE NATION~OBAMA NATIONALIZING POLICE IN VIOLATION OF POSSE COMITATUS LAW

TURNING AMERICA INTO A BATTLEFIELD
By John Whitehead of the Rutherford Institute:
Published on May 11, 2015
Why is the federal government distributing obscene amounts of military equipment, weapons and ammunition to police departments around the country? Why is the military using southwestern states as a staging ground for guerilla warfare drills (Jade Helm 15)? What exactly is the U.S. government preparing for? Whatever the answer, John W. Whitehead, in this week's vodcast, warns of the pending day when our so-called “government of the people, by the people, for the people” is no longer answerable to “we the people.” (Republished in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes)
LORETTA LYNCH, THE NEW ATTORNEY GENERAL, 
WITH ERIC HOLDER & OBAMA FLANKING HER

Nationalized Police: 

The Real Agenda Behind Baltimore Unrest

BY Alex Newman
SEE: http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/crime/item/20854-nationalized-police-the-real-agenda-behind-baltimore-unrest; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

Behind the orchestrated riots that were allowed to strike Baltimore in recent weeks, and Ferguson, Missouri, before that, lies an agenda that has nothing to do with the fact that “Black Lives Matter.” As the Obama administration and more than a few race-mongers allied with the White House have already made clear, the real goal involves further chipping away at local self-government and community control over police departments — and expanding federal control over local law enforcement in its place. In between fanning the division and unrest with racialist rhetoric, Obama is also exploiting the chaos he is helping to create in a bid to advance everything from a greater government role in child rearing to increased wealth redistribution.
In recent weeks, as anyone who watches the news knows, parts of Baltimore went up in flames. But despite the appearance of spontaneity, with crowds sparked to riot by the suspicious death of Freddie Gray in police custody, the chaos was no accident. In fact, as The New American reported recently, city officials ordered police to “stand down” so that looters and rioters could have what the mayor described as “space to destroy.” And destroy they did, garnering headlines worldwide and giving Big Government-promoting race profiteers a giant platform to spew propaganda. Now that the “destroy” phase is over, politicians, and especially Obama, are coming out of the woodwork to advance their government “solutions.”
Late last week, for example, the Obama administration’s Justice Department announced that it would be launching an “investigation” of the Baltimore Police Department. Instead of investigating why the police were ordered to “stand down” and allow looters to assault innocent victims and burn down parts of the city, however, Obama’s controversial new attorney general, Loretta Lynch, has other matters in mind. Among other angles being probed, Lynch said the investigation would focus on allegations that local police — 50 percent black and controlled by a black mayor and a black police chief — engaged in “discriminatory policing.” Incredibly, Baltimore Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake, as if to acknowledge her own incompetence while throwing the police department she leads under the bus, actually invited D.C. to come “help.”
Apparently Lynch also feels the Justice Department has a lead role to play in “fixing” Baltimore by further expanding the gargantuan federal footprint there — implicitly suggesting that the Obama administration believes Baltimore’s super majority of black voters and their mostly black elected officials are incapable of doing it themselves. “Our goal is to work with the community, public officials, and law enforcement alike to create a stronger, better Baltimore,” the attorney general said, sounding oblivious to her actual constitutional duties and the subtle racism inherent in the idea that Baltimore needs federal “assistance” to sort out its local problems. Of course, allowing D.C. to further intrude into local issues will only make those problems worse — yet that is the plan.
Ironically, despite the establishment media’s efforts to conceal the fact, three of the officers charged in Gray’s death were black. The “racism” narrative, though, serves a number of important goals, and so it will continue to be shouted from the rooftops by race-mongers and the media, regardless of the facts. As if on cue, close Obama ally and race-profiteer Al Sharpton descended on the city and set out to dupe the people of Baltimore into believing that giving up their right to local self-government would somehow improve their police department. He called on the Justice Department to “take over policing in this country,” adding, “We’re going to have to fight states’ rights.” Sharpton, of course, is a frequent visitor at the White House.
In a recent article exposing as a fraud the racialist narrative promoted by Sharpton, Obama, and others, writer Selwyn Duke also exposed the logical fallacy behind the thinking that stripping the people of Baltimore of their right to control their own police would somehow help matters. “Our local-control model ensures that if we don’t like our town’s law-enforcement policies, we can vote for a different sheriff or mayor (who may appoint the police chief) next election,” he wrote. “Baltimore is a prime example. If blacks don’t have a police force to their liking in a city with a black mayor, black police chief, and mostly black politicians — voted into office by a population 70 percent black — how will it help if their law-enforcement policy is determined by federal officials voted into office by a national population 87 percent non-black?”
Regardless of the flawed logic or the U.S. Constitution’s limitations on federal power, though, the Obama administration’s agenda to federalize law enforcement and build up a massive new domestic “security” force using any conceivable pretext is hardly new. In fact, it has been apparent since before the presidential election. “We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we set,” Obama said while running for the presidency. “We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.” And indeed, in between attacks on police, the administration has been working feverishly toward those radical anti-constitutional goals.
More recently, Obama has openly promoted various schemes to nationalize police departments, including foisting federal “standards” on local and state police in exchange for bribes from Washington, D.C. Critics ridiculed the plot as “Common Core for police,” a reference to the Obama-backed national school standards being used to nationalize and globalize the education system. In many respects, it is a similar strategy. In addition, United Nations boss Ban Ki-moon even demanded last year that American police follow what he described as “international standards.” An Obama “task force” created with an executive order also recommended more federal control of law enforcement. In March, the administration announced six cities that would be used for a “pilot” program to essentially usurp local control of police under various pretexts.
In Baltimore, Obama again wasted no time in pushing his agenda. In fact, on May 1, before the smoke had even cleared, the White House, citing Baltimore’s riots, announced a new unconstitutional “grant” program for local police forces — as if a lack of federal funding for police from a deeply indebted, out of control, and practically bankrupt government was the problem in Baltimore or anywhere else. Separately, another one of Obama’s first reactions to the unrest in Baltimore was to whip up hysteria over race and class. “If we’re just looking at it as policing, we’re looking at it too narrowly,” Obama proclaimed, citing “opportunity gaps” that make it harder for blacks to succeed. “Those opportunity gaps begin early, often at birth, and they compound over time, becoming harder and harder to bridge.”
Representative Steve King (R-Iowa) even blamed Obama and his constant efforts to drive “wedges” between people for sparking the riots in Baltimore. Obama allies, such as billionaire statist George Soros, who bankrolled Ferguson’s chaos; as well as race-monger Sharpton, who pours fuel on race fires; and the establishment media, which justifies rioting and violence, have also been critically necessary in promoting the establishment narrative. Whether black Americans have legitimate grievances is not the point — all Americans have legitimate grievances, considering that their elected officials in D.C. and state capitols across America swear an oath to uphold the Constitution before trampling all over it. What is happening in America is about grievances that are being exploited, along with countless Americans, to advance a sinister agenda.
There is a reason that billionaire totalitarian Soros showered millions of dollars on “activists” to descend on Ferguson. There is a reason outside agitators went to Baltimore to whip up unrest. There is a reason the mayor ordered police to stand down. There is a reason the Obama administration and its allies are fanning the flames. There is a reason that the establishment is exploiting every conceivable fault line — “race,” “gender,” “socio-economic status,” police versus community, and more — to sow division among the American people. It has nothing to do with the undeniable fact that black lives, and all lives, matter — and has everything to do with lawlessly empowering the out-of-control federal leviathan even further.  
 Related articles:



LICENSE PLATE TRACKING DEVICES DEMANDED BY DHS, IRS & DEBT COLLECTORS


LICENSE PLATE TRACKING DEVICES DEMANDED BY DHS, IRS & DEBT COLLECTORS
SEE: http://the-trumpet-online.com/dhs-irs-debt-collectors-fight-expand-use-license-plate-tracking-devices/; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

DHS, IRS, Debt Collectors Fight to Expand Use of License Plate Tracking Devices

Despite the objections of millions of Americans and civil liberties advocates, the Department of Homeland Security refuses completely to abandon its license plate tracking program. And now, other government and industry agencies are joining in the surveillance. While there has been some slight scaling back of the scope of the surveillance, DHS will continue using the controversial technology in almost half of the United States, comprising most of the largest population centers. “The LPR [License Plate Reader] data service shall compile LPR from at least 25 states and 24 of the top 30 most populous metropolitan statistical areas to the extent authorized by law in those locations,” a contract issued by DHS Immigration and Customs officials reports.
There will be a corresponding decrease in the number of images gathered by the devices that are subsequently reported to DHS. One source indicates that the inventory will be reduced from 30 million images, as originally requested by DHS, to six million. Although that may seem like at least a small victory for privacy and liberty, that’s not the whole story. Last year Bloomberg reported that the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and the Forest Service (among others) awarded nearly half a million dollars to Vigilant Solutions, a California-based company that provides tools for tracking license plates and for accessing license plate databases.
Why would the IRS and the Forest Service need the technology to track the license plates of Americans? Bloomberg explained: “The IRS uses a variety of investigative tools similar to other law-enforcement agencies to assist with criminal cases,” Eric Smith, an agency spokesman, said in an e-mail. He declined to say how the IRS used the records in its investigations. The Forest Service, part of the Department of Agriculture, awarded Vigilant a contract valued at as much as $47,019 for its “CarDetector” system in August 2009, records show. The product scans and captures license plate numbers, compares the data to law enforcement lists of wanted vehicles and sends alerts when such vehicles are detected, according to the company’s website. “License plate readers are helpful to our law enforcement officers with illegal activities on national forest system lands in California,” Tiffany Holloway, a spokeswoman for the agency, said in an e-mail. She declined to comment about what types of crimes the tools are used to investigate or provide examples of how the technology has helped law enforcement.
Constitutionalists should sense something sinister in the IRS’s purchase of license plate tracking technology. Their senses would be right. Owe money to the IRS? Having trouble making your mortgage payments? Ever been sued or been arrested? Soon, the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) will know the answers to these questions before you pass through security, and they might affect whether you are cleared for travel.
In an article from October 2013, the New York Times reported, “The Transportation Security Administration is expanding its screening of passengers before they arrive at the airport by searching a wide array of government and private databases that can include records like car registrations and employment information.”
The complete list of sources of personal data reviewed by the TSA also includes:
▪ private employment information
▪ vehicle registrations
▪ travel history
▪ property ownership records
▪ physical characteristics
▪ tax identification numbers
▪ past travel itineraries
▪ law enforcement information
▪ “intelligence” information
▪ passport numbers
▪ frequent flier information
▪ other “identifiers” linked to DHS databases
Civil libertarians and privacy advocates have reacted to the ramped up surveillance, particularly as it relates to license plate tracking and other technology that could give the government access to a person’s precise location in almost real time. “Ultimately, you’re creating a national database of location information,” Electronic Frontier Foundation staff attorney Jennifer Lynch told the Washington Post in February 2014. “When all that data is compiled and aggregated, you can track somebody as they’re going through their life.” After learning of the IRS’s obtaining of the license plate tracking technology, Lynch updated her criticism. “Especially with the IRS, I don’t know why these agencies are getting access to this kind of information,” she reportedly said. “These systems treat every single person in an area as if they’re under investigation for a crime — that is not the way our criminal justice system was set up or the way things work in a democratic society.” Sputnik puts an even finer point on the problem: “Using massive systems of automated license plate recognition devices absolutely violates our fundamental right to privacy,” Nicolas Sarwark, Chairman of the US Libertarian National Committee, told Sputnik in February. “These systems allow the government to know everything about a person’s movements, especially when combined with facial recognition.”
Lynch and Sarwrk are right. Any deprivation of liberty without conforming to the requirements set out in the Fourth Amendment is one too many. If we are a Republic of laws, then the supreme constitutional law of the land must be adhered to every time the government wants to search and seize anything from Americans. The standard is not whether or not the Department of Homeland Security, the IRS, or the Forest Service claims that investigations create the need to violate the Constitution. The standard is the Constitution — for every issue, on every occasion, with no exceptions. Anything less than that is a step toward tyranny.
It’s not just the government, however, that wants to keep an eye on all of us. Consider this chilling twist to the plot provided by The Intercept: As privacy advocates battle to rein in the use of automated license plate readers (ALPRs), they’re going up against another industry that benefits from this mass surveillance: lenders and debt collectors. Several states and cities, as quoted in the article and chronicled by The New American, are taking steps to regulate the use of the license plate tracking devices. As efforts to stymie the surveillance increase, the voice of a new player — debt collectors — is raised in defense of the devices. Quoting Danielle Fagre Arlow, senior vice president to the American Financial Services Association (AFSA), a trade group for consumer lending companies, The Intercept reports: “Our particular interest in the bill,” Arlow wrote, “is the negative impact it would have on ALPR’s valuable role in our industry – the ability to identify and recover vehicles associated with owners who have defaulted on their loans and are not responding to good-faith efforts to contact them.”
Arlow opposed the bill’s restrictions on “how long data can be kept because access to historical data is important in determining where hard-to-find vehicles are likely located.” AFSA lobbied against several similar bills as they were proposed around the country. In Massachussetts, the group lobbied against a bill designed to destroy ALPR records after 90 days. AFSA argued that such a regime is unfair because “ALPR systems work best when they are used to string together the historical locations of vehicles.” As BetaBoston reported, Digital Recognition, a leading ALPR company, works with about 400 repossession companies. The firm lists Bank of America, JP Morgan Chase, HSBC and Citibank among its clients. According to the ACLU of Rhode Island, the ALPR privacy bill died last session — notably, the bill failed after the consumer lending lobbyists voiced their opposition.
For Americans concerned about the loss of privacy and individual liberty, this is an unsettling alliance: Big Brother, the debt collection industry (a sector that has come under significant fire for its abuses), and the banks they serve combining to destroy what’s left of liberty. Given the rapid growth of government and the increasingly invasive policies it is adopting, it seems that to have to battle big banks, as well, is a fight few will have the stomach for.

ABC'S "DIRTY TRICK": INVITES ALEX JONES TO SPEAK ABOUT JADE HELM~ABC'S CAR TRANSPORTING JONES IS LATE FOR SHOW


ALEX JONES BRANDED AS A "NO SHOW" 
FOR STEPHANOPOULOS PROGRAM; 
BUT ABC TO BLAME
Published on May 10, 2015
ABC pulled a dirty tricks stunt this morning by claiming that Alex Jones was a “no show” for a live appearance on This Week with George Stephanopoulos to talk about the Jade Helm military exercise, when in reality the car ABC sent to take Jones to the studio arrived just 12 minutes before the segment began. http://www.infowars.com/dirty-tricks-...

JONES DIDN'T "CHICKEN OUT"

Alex Jones Puts ABC Troll In His Place: