Translate

Monday, July 15, 2013

"WILD GOOSE CHASE"~NAZARENE MIKE KING ORGANIZES SPIRITUALLY & SEXUALLY DEPRAVED EMERGENT/MYSTICAL "WILD GOOSE FESTIVAL" FOR 2013

                THIS YEAR’S THEME: “REMEMBERING THE BODY”

See: http://wildgoosefestival.org/, which declares:
"We dream of a movement where everyone is welcome to participate. We are intentionally building a space in which we invite everyone to value, respect, and fully affirm people of any ethnicity, age, gender, gender expression, sexual identity, education, bodily condition, religious affiliation, or economic background, particularly the marginalized. We are committed to fair trade, gift exchange, ecological sanity, and economic inclusion. We strive for high standards of mutual respect, non-hierarchical leadership, and participative planning."
The lineup for this event includes:
LGBT singing group "Micah's Rule", which we posted about before:

Jonathan Wilson Hartgrove, leader in the "New Monastic Movement", who we also reported on in a prior post:

Brian McLaren, emergent mystic heretic:
Nadia Bolz-Weber, tattooed pastrix from the Evangelical Lutheran Church:
Phyllis Tickle, emergent re-definer of Christianity:
Philip Yancey, emergent heretic:
Doug Pagitt, emergent re-definer of Christianity and heretic:

Reads like total and absolute heresy and apostasy, mixed with Hindu yoga, Buddhist mindfulness, sexual perversion, ecstatic pagan dance, mystical practices, carnality, and otherwise bizarre spirituality.
"World-class musicians, best-selling authors, and people from all across the country will be descending on Hot Springs, North Carolina (just north of Asheville) for Wild Goose Festival 2013, August 8-11.
The theme of this year's festival is "ReMembering The Body," and there's a whole host of great sessions on tap. Here's just a sample of what you can experience:
  • Strangers at My Door — Jonathan Wilson-Hartgrove and friends lead a time of storytelling and singing as they share joys and struggles from the past decade of life in a hospitality house
  • Re-membering The Body — A service of Holy Eucharist focused on the plight of the poor around the world, led by Ian Cron

  • Asher Kolieboi







  • Galatians 3:28 — A talk by Asher Kolieboi, co-founder of the Legalize Trans* campaign, on creating trans* inclusive faith communities
  • Ecstatic Dance Wave — Led by members of the Asheville Movement Collective
  • Fifty Shades of Hope — A talk byJulie Clawson on re-membering our bodies by embracing the power of eros
  • Disabled Ritual — A service led by members of the Transmission community in New York City
  • Radical Pro-Creation — A talk by Kerlin Richter on liberative parenting as Gospel witness
  • Mystic Soul Movement — Explore the path to your inner divine through gentle yoga-based movement, relaxation techniques, and guided contemplative prayer, led byTheresa B Pasquale
  • The Blessing of the Other — A talk by Alexia Salvatierra on creating welcome for immigrants and other wanderers 
  • Laughter Yoga — This practice combines unconditional laughter with yogic breathing, because laughter truly is the best medicine

  • Megan DeFranza







  • When Male and Female Is Not Enough — A talk on welcoming the intersexed among us, led by Lianne Simon and Megan DeFranza 
  • Dancing Mindfulness — Explore the seven principles of mindfulness and the beauty of prayer in motion in this come-as-you-are dance workshop, led by Meghan Lin
  • Re-membering the Creator(s) — Weaving stories with thoughtful melodies and insights from some philosophical prophets, Jared Byas and Levi Weaver will make a case for how spiritual creativity will lead us into the future 
  • DoxaSoma — A physical practice that incorporates elements of stretching and strength-building with prayer, worship, and reflection on the Word of God
  • And, of course, the Late Night Dance Party … every night until the wee hours!"
  • ________________________________________________________

  • Apprising has had a lot to say about this annual event in North Carolina which resembles "Woodstock":

    Now we have the latest from Manny Silva:

    Wildgoose Festival: A Small Example Of What Is Wrong With The Church
    Manny Silva, July 15, 2013

    “These are spots in your love feasts, while they feast with you without fear, serving only themselves. They are clouds without water, carried about by the winds; late autumn trees without fruit, twice dead, pulled up by the roots; 13 raging waves of the sea, foaming up their own shame; wandering stars for whom is reserved the blackness of darkness forever. Jude 1:12-13
    While I finish up my General Assembly summary report for next week, I remind you again of a recurring event that is a good illustration of the depravity being allowed with impunity within the leadership of the Church of the Nazarene.  I am talking about Wildgoose Festival, which is happening again in August.  I have written several times about it, and have sent my reports to the General Superintendents.  Not a word from them, and apparently, no action has been taken to distance the church from this festival.
    How is the church connected to this Sodom and Gomorrah- style party?
    The organizer of the festival is Mike King.  He is adjunct professor at Nazarene Theological Seminary, and is a top youth leader in the church as well, which is most troubling.  In this blog post, he talks proudly of his involvement with Wildgoose:http://www.patheos.com/blogs/wildgoosefestival/2012/03/board-president-mike-king-recounts-wild-gooses-journey/.  Mike King not only promotes this festival with impunity, but he is also one of the primary promoters of contemplative spirituality in the denomination.
    Also involved again for the second straight year is Nazarene pastor Gabriel Salguerro, who is seen in this promotional video, starting it 1:08, praising this pagan gathering celebrating anything but biblical Christianity.  Salguerro is involved with many endeavors that promote a radical, left wing and sometimes Marxist style philosophy, under the guise of a social justice supposedly driven by biblical principles.  For a Christian pastor to promote such a festival again shows the lack of leadership in the denomination from the top. It’s just like a parent who looks the other way when their child starts getting involved in all sorts of decadent and harmful behavior, and the parent pretends that he does not notice. Such is the leadership which has allowed this and many, many more unbiblical activities and teachings to go unchallenged.
    In a report by Jeffrey Walton at his blog, he writes on how much even worst this year’s Wildgoose will become.  The push for creating “trans” inclusive communities has been added to the list of topics, along with the recurring themes of homosexuality, non-Christian religions and activities, and of course the all night parties.http://juicyecumenism.com/2013/07/12/wild-goose-festival-migrates-through-turbulent-issues-of-transgenderism-intersex/
    ( See also: http://juicyecumenism.com/2012/06/27/quack-christianity-at-the-wild-goose/
    and: http://juicyecumenism.com/2012/06/23/wild-goose-gets-an-education/,
    and: http://juicyecumenism.com/2012/06/22/role-playing-at-wild-goose/).

    So Wildgoose is a little microcosm of the Church of the Nazarene’s lack of moral integrity and church discipline.  Just about anything can be done by just about any Nazarene leader, pastor, or layperson, and it will be okay with everyone.  However, please keep in mind there are exceptions, as listed below:
    Beware:​
    -If you dare to preach against the emergent church, you will be fired. 
    -If you dare to stand for the complete truth of Scripture, you may not get ordained.
    -If you preach that homosexuality is sinful, you may
    ​ ​
    be asked to “tone it down.”
    -If you dare to bring up concerns to your pastors, you just might get ostracized.
    -If you dare to expose false teaching in the church, you will be labeled a hater.
    -If you dare to say you believe in the Genesis account of creation, you might just get labeled an ignorant kook.

    But, you have no worries at all:

    -If you promote ungodly festivals.
    -Or teach evolution to our youth.
    -Or promote contemplative mysticism.
    -Or send your youth on field trips to Roman Catholic Monasteries.
    -Or promote LGBT groups, and brag about worshipping with openly homosexual pastors.
    -Or teach that the Roman Catholic Church and the Nazarenes preach the same Gospel.
    -Or join hands with the social justice crowd.
    -Or use books by heretics instead of the Bible.
    -Or invite Rob Bell and Leonard Sweet to speak to pastors.
    Such is the state of the Church of the Nazarene today.  It’s not my father’s church that he knew years ago.

    Related Articles:


    Mike King:​



    Manny Silva
    Stand For Truth Ministries
    "The entirety of Your word is truth, And every one of Your righteous judgments endures forever." Psalm 119:160
    ___________________________________________________________________________________________
    UPDATE AS OF JULY 23, 2013 FROM LIGHTHOUSE TRAILS RESEARCH:

        "This year, from August 8-11, 2013, the Wildgoose Festival will take place in Hot Springs, North Carolina. The festival is an emergent ”church” event, which since its inception has included on the speaker list names like Brian McLarenPhyllis TickleJim WallisRichard Rohr, and Tony Jones. This year, Christianity Today editor and popular evangelical author Philip Yancey will join McLaren, Tickle, and a number of other hardcore emergent at the festival.Intervarsity Press, a long-standing evangelical publisher, is one of the sponsors helping to finance the event.
        The Wildgoose Festival began in 2011, started by a group of North Americans who had been attending a festival in the UK called Greenbelt1 and were “inspired” to begin a similar event in the U.S. A history statement reads:
    A place to meet each other in a renewed moment – a space for change. In the spirit of vibrant, category-defying Celtic Christianity, we saw our desire embodied in the Celtic Church’s way of speaking about the enigmatic Holy Spirit: The Wild Goose, who wanders where she will. Who can tame her? No one. Far better it is to embark on a Wild Goose Chase, and see the terrain of our faith be transformed.
        Translated, what that means is that Christianity cannot be defined, or confined, to one particular set of beliefs (doctrine), that it is always changing, always transforming (thus the Bible, as Phyllis Tickles says, is a nice poetic book of beautiful stories, but not an authority from God). This has been the mantra-cry of the emergent church (see Faith Undone for a history of the current emergent church). Today, the emergent church has evolved into a full-blown Eastern-style mysticism-energized, quasi-Marxist, liberal, anti-atonement, pro-homosexual marriage ”community.”
    Joining Yancey, McLaren, Phyllis Tickle, and Intervarsity Press will be Richard Cizik (formerly in leadership at the National Association of Evangelicals but left after showing support for homosexual marriage), Troy Bronsink, Mark Scandrette (see Faith Undone on Bronsink and Scandrette), Ian Morgan Cron,  and a fairly large number of other emergent-embracing speakers. Past speakers have included Lynne Hybels, the now late Richard Twiss (Indigenous People’s Movement), and Doug Pagitt.
        The point we want to make in this brief conference alert is that when you have one of the most prolific evangelical authors and an editor of THE Christian magazine - Philip Yancey – along with a formerly traditional evangelical publishing company – Intervarsity Press – participating in an event like the Wildgoose Festival, you can see how much the emergent church has influenced and infiltrated evangelical Christianity. And even still, Christian leaders and most pastors remain silent."
    _____________________________________________________________________________________


    DELAWARE-A NO SALES TAX "SMALL WONDER" BUT BIG ON LIBERALISM & NOW HOSTILE TO CHRISTIANITY IN THE NAME OF "GENDER IDENTITY PROTECTION"

     NO REFERENDUM THIS TIME FOR THE PEOPLE TO DECIDE.
    CHURCHES AND THE YMCA/YWCA WILL HAVE TO PROVIDE TRANSGENDER BATHROOMS AND HIRE TRANSGENDERS. OR ELSE!
     Governor Markell with transgender aide Sarah (Tim) McBride:



     YES. MR MARKELL! A NEW DIRECTION INTO A PIT OF MORAL DEPRAVITY WITHOUT LOOKING BACK. CHRISTIANS AND CHURCHES BE DAMNED!
        Delaware is small like Rhode Island. Smallness doesn't mean the two states are not on the front lines of implementing all forms of liberalism, which they are.  Delaware, although below the Mason-Dixon line, identifies more with those magnetic liberal attracting states of the northeast which go out of their way to portray itself as welcoming, and offering incentives to, those who are looking for a haven for "victimized" Democratic voting socialist types who are in the minority elsewhere. Delaware has always been small, and on different levels, but now with Joe Biden, "native Delawarean" and self-appointed gun regulation/confiscation expert to his own state and the nation, and as vice president to Obama, Delaware is on the way to becoming a credible collectivist global player and nanny state. That is, if you will please turn a blind eye to all the ills that liberalism has birthed in this state, and instead blame Bush, Republicans and now Christians.
        Delaware may be a quick rest stop along the Interstate 95 highway corridor for those travelling between the corrupt, morally bankrupt melting pot cities of the northeast like Boston, New York City, Philadelphia and Baltimore, but if it were not for its 0% sales tax, low property taxes, and low corporation taxes, there would really be no compelling reason to live, work, or spend time there. It's similar to buying a junk bond; first you get a substantial discount from its face value, and then a very high dividend payout for assuming the high risk of living with an investment that is nearly worthless, and could default at any moment. The offsets may be high for a reason; the quality of life is at risk, but no one dares admit this. Delaware, in effect, gives you a discount and an incentive to keep your mouth shut. Just gleefully pay the tickets for driving through red light cameras so local government can have a way of circumventing the peoples' tax referendums which sometimes denies government and schools what they think is justly theirs out of your pocket.
        Christians and other conservatives who still remain in Delaware have virtually no voice; not because they have no voice or been openly denied a voice, (except by the liberal press who won't print anti-liberal bias), but because they have resigned themselves to the idea that they are too small a minority to be heard or taken seriously, and/or are just intimidated and feel overwhelmed.
        Occasionally, there appears on the scene politicians who make a feeble attempt to rally the Christian/conservative/Catholic vote, but always to no avail, because there is never enough "grass roots support" and/or money. Pastors and their congregations have for decades swallowed the idea that they are not permitted to be politically involved under a misguided interpretation of "separation of church and state". Add to that the willing ignorance and preference for comfort common to a vast majority of Christians, and you have the perfect scenario for a dictatorial, collectivist state to impose its will.
        Given the progression of this trend in Delaware, it comes as no surprise that Governor Jack Markell signed the Gender Identity Nondiscrimination Act (SB 97) on June 19, 2013, ensuring equal legal protections to transgender individuals in Delaware. 
    See: http://news.delaware.gov/2013/06/19/governor-signs-gender-identity-nondiscrimination-act/
    Act in full: 
    http://legis.delaware.gov/LIS/lis147.nsf/vwLegislation/SB+97/$file/legis.html?open.
    Synopsis: 
    "This Act adds the term “gender identity” to the already-existing list of 
    prohibited practices of discrimination and hate crimes. As such, this Act 
    would forbid discrimination against a person on the basis of gender 
    identity in housing, employment, public works contracting, public 
    accommodations, and insurance, and it would provide for increased 
    punishment of a person who intentionally selects the victim of a crime 
    because of the victim’s gender identity."
        The Senate passed the final version of the bill earlier in the day by an 11-9 vote following approval in the House on Tuesday by a 24-17 margin. Senate Majority Whip Margaret Rose Henry, D-Wilmington East, was the lead sponsor, with additional sponsorship from Senate President Patricia Blevins and Representative Bryon Short.
        Governor Markell proudly proclaimed:
    “Our mission to build a welcoming and accepting state that can compete in the global economy requires laws that reflect our values,” said Markell. “Today, we guarantee that our transgender relatives and neighbors can work hard, participate in our communities, and live their lives with dignity and in safety.” “I especially want to thank my friend Sarah McBride, an intelligent and talented Delawarean who happens to be transgender. She courageously stood before the General Assembly to describe her personal struggles with gender identity and communicate her desire to return home after her college graduation without fear. Her tireless advocacy for passage of this legislation has made a real difference for all transgender people in Delaware.”

    Sarah McBride has been an Aide to Delaware Gov. Jack Markell.

    Sarah McBride self-described transgender speaks out in this YouTube video:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t9Gb4_9rZ1s.


    The McBride Family Talks About Gender Identity Protections:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GlJvDi8q5k4

    Attorney General Beau Biden supports gender identity protections:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pSyiH1KaBdg.


    Delawareans Talk About Marriage Equality: Jen & Emily:


    A few outspoken Dealawareans are opposed based on God's law:
    See: http://christiannews.net/2013/07/13/christians-warn-bathroom-bill-allowing-men-in-womens-restrooms-is-sweeping-nation/.

    WHO IS SARAH MCBRIDE? ACTUALLY, TIM MCBRIDE:
    Tim McBride, American University student body president, comes out as transgendered (after 21 years)
    See: http://www.wjla.com/articles/2012/05/tim-mcbride-american-university-student-body-president-comes-out-as-transgendered--75776.html.

    See also: 
    http://wamu.org/programs/metro_connection/12/06/08/from_tim_to_sarah_au_student_body_president_unveils_big_news.
    Sarah (Tim) with proud parents:



     

    Sunday, July 14, 2013

    RICK WARREN'S "CELEBRATE RECOVERY"-12 STEP PROGRAM MIXED WITH A LITTLE BIBLE & LOTS OF PSYCHOHERESY & PSYCHOBABBLE




    Rick Warren speaks about:

    "7 Reasons I Believe in Celebrate Recovery" in this video:

    Apprising http://apprising.org/2011/02/04/saddleback-church-celebrating-recovery/, has a video of an alleged "Celebrate Recovery" anger management class:

    T. A. McMahon of the The Berean Call issued a short overview of the "Celebrate Recovery" 12 Step Program redefined by Rick Warren in this article from 2005: http://www.thebereancall.org/node/2568.
    The full text of it is below:

    “A Way Which Seemeth Right...”


    Oct 1 2005

    There is a way which seemeth right unto a man, but the end thereof are the ways of death. (Proverbs:14:12)
    I recently attended the Celebrate Recovery Summit 2005 at Saddleback Church in Southern California. The primary purpose of the conference was to train new leaders who would return to their churches and inaugurate the Celebrate Recovery (CR) program. Saddleback’s pastor, Rick Warren, describes CR as “a biblical and balanced program to help people overcome their hurts, habits, and hang-ups...[that is] based on the actual words of Jesus rather than psychological theory [emphasis added].” 1
    As a long-time critic of psychological counseling and 12-Steps therapies in the church (see The Seduction of Christianity and archived TBCnewsletter articles and Q&As), I was pleased to have the opportunity to learn firsthand from those who are leading and/or participating in the program, to better understand what was intended in CR, and to see how it is implemented. What I learned right away was that the 3,000 or so in attendance had a tremendous zeal for the Lord and an unquestionable sincerity in desiring to help those who were struggling with habitual sin. This was my impression in all of my interactions—with individuals, in small groups, in workshop sessions, and in the general worship sessions. The CR Summit lasted three (eight- to nine-hour) days and covered nearly every aspect of Celebrate Recovery.
    Nevertheless, other thoughts ran through my mind as I reviewed whether or not I had missed something significant in my previous criticisms of 12-Steps recovery therapies. Is Celebrate Recovery’s 12-Steps program truly different—that is, “biblical and balanced…rather than psychological”—as Rick Warren believes? Furthermore, is he simply naïve when he says in his “Road to Recovery” series of sermons, “In 1935 a couple of guys formulated, based upon the Scriptures , what are now known as the classic twelve steps of Alcoholics Anonymous and used by hundreds of other recovery groups. Twenty million Americans are in a recovery group every week and there are 500,000 recovery groups. The basis is God’s Word [emphasis added].” Or is Celebrate Recovery another alarming example of a way that seems right to a man but one that is turning believers to ways and means other than the Bible to solve their sin-related problems? Let’s consider these questions in light of some A.A. and 12 Steps background information.
    To begin with, 12-Steps programs are not just a Saddleback Church issue. Increasing numbers of evangelical churches are sponsoring Alcoholics Anonymous (A.A.) and Narcotics Anonymous (N.A.) meetings and/or creating their own self-help groups based upon A.A.’s 12-Steps principles. Bill Wilson, one of the founders of A.A., created the 12 Steps. Wilson was a habitual drunk who had two life-changing events that he claims helped him achieve sobriety: 1) he was (mis)informed by a doctor that his drinking habit was a disease and was therefore not his fault, and 2) he had an experience (which he viewed as spiritual enlightenment) that convinced him that only “a Power greater than” himself could keep him sober. Attempting to understand his mystical experience, he was led into spiritism, a form of divination condemned in the Scriptures. His official biography indicates that the content of the 12-Steps principles came to him “rapidly” through spirit communication. Certainly not from God.
    Celebrate Recovery began 14 years ago at Saddleback and is used in more than 3,500 churches today, making it evangelical Christianity’s most prominent and widely exported 12-Steps church program. Warren considers CR to be “the center of living a purpose-driven life and building a purpose-driven church” and recently announced that Chuck Colson’s Prison Fellowship would begin implementing CR in every prison where the ministry is functioning.
    Celebrate Recovery is a very complex methodology that attempts to bring biblical adjustments to the 12-Steps program originated by A.A. and utilized in numerous other “addiction” recovery programs. The complexity, however, applies to the setting up and implementation of the program as well as to the strict rules that govern its execution. Although there are many problems related to “making it work,” there is only space in this article to address some fundamental issues. Let’s begin with the implications regarding the name of the program.
    Reflecting A.A.’s influence upon CR, the term “Recovery” is significant. All those in A.A. are “recovering” alcoholics, who, according to A.A., never completely recover. Recovery is a term that primarily denotes a process of physical healing. A.A. teaches that alcoholism is a disease for which there is no ultimate cure. Although CR rejects A.A.’s view of alcoholism as a disease and calls it sin, the title nevertheless promotes the A.A. concept in contradiction to what the Bible teaches. Sin is not something from which a believer is “in recovery.” Sin is confessed by the sinner and forgiven by God. The believer is cleansed of the sin right then. “I said, I will confess my transgressions unto the LORD; and thou forgavest the iniquity of my sin” (Ps:32:5).
    At the 2005 Celebrate Recovery Summit, every speaker introduced himself or herself in the A.A. “recovery” mode, with this “Christianized” difference: “Hi, I’m so and so…and I’m a believer in Jesus Christ who struggles with issues of (alcohol, drug, codependency, sex, or whatever) addiction.” The audience then applauded to affirm the individual for overcoming the “denial” of his or her habitual sin. Not to confess some “addiction” or specific sin struggle raises suspicions of “being in denial.” Throughout the three-day conference, there was never a hint from any of the speakers that anything about A.A., 12 Steps, or CR might not be biblical. Moreover, where Celebrate Recovery programs were not available, those “in recovery” were encouraged to attend A.A. or N.A. meetings.
    Rick Warren, on video, reassured the Summit attendees that CR was no man-made therapy. He insisted that CR was based upon the “actual words of Jesus Christ from the eight Beatitudes, which parallel the 12 Steps” and identified his own “Higher Power: His name is Jesus Christ.” I don’t find “Higher Power,” which is a misrepresentation of God, in the Bible. Nor can I fathom why a Bible-believing Christian would want to promote Bill Wilson’s concept and methodology. Why not simply rely on what the Bible teaches?
    Is God’s way completely sufficient to set one free from so-called addictions? Did A.A.’s founders provide a more effective way? If so, what did the church do for the nearly 2,000 years prior to Bill Wilson’s “spiritually enlightened” way to recovery? Moreover, if Wilson’s method really works, why are some in the church trying to add Jesus as one’s Higher Power and the Beatitudes to it? On the other hand, if the effectiveness of the 12-Steps program is questionable at best and detrimental to the gospel and to a believer’s life and growth in Christ, why attempt to “Christianize” such a program? It is imperative that all believers ask themselves whether or not they truly believe that the Scriptures and the enablement of God’s Holy Spirit are sufficient for “all things that pertain to life and godliness” (2 Pt 1:3). A rejection of this biblical teaching is the only possible justification for turning to ways the Bible condemns: “the counsel of the ungodly” (Ps:1:1) and “a way which seemeth right unto a man.”
    How dependent is Celebrate Recovery upon (with minor modifications) A.A.’s 12 Steps? Completely! Those going through CR’s small group take from 12 to 16 months to complete the 12-Steps program. Many go through more than one small group and often become leaders in one while attending others. Without Bill Wilson’s principles, the CR program would be reduced to a handful of misapplied Bible verses. Tragically, the most obvious biblical problem with such an approach to overcoming habitual sins seems to be dismissed by all 12-Steps advocates: the Bible never offers a by-the-numbers self-help methodology for deliverance from sin or for living a sanctified life. God’s way involves obedience to His full counsel and maturity in Christ through the enablement of His Holy Spirit.
    Warren’s CR program views the 12 Steps as generally compatible with Scripture yet seeks out verses that appear to biblically reinforce each step. In doing so, however, scriptural interpretations are forced upon concepts that either have no direct relationship to the Bible or that pervert the true interpretation of the scripture intended to support the particular step. CR’s attempt to use the Beatitudes as biblical principles for overcoming habitual sins, for example, is a serious distortion of the Word of God.
    Search as you may, you’ll find no commentaries that even hint at such a use of the Beatitudes. Why? Simply because the Beatitudes all have to do with seeking the Kingdom of God and nothing to do with solving an individual’s so-called addictions. Again, why try to legitimize from Scripture Wilson’s “ungodly counsel” from “seducing spirits [bringing] doctrines of devils” (1 Tim:4:1)?
    Consider, for example, the “Beatitudes-justified” first three steps: (1) We admitted we were powerless over our addictions and compulsive behaviors. That our lives had become unmanageable. “Happy are those who are spiritually poor.” (2) Came to believe that a power greater than ourselves could restore us to sanity. “Happy are those who mourn, for they shall be comforted.” (3) Made a decision to turn our life and our will over to the care of God (modified from A.A.’s “God as we understood Him”). “Happy are the meek.” This is more than a misdirected attempt to sanctify (in Rick Warren’s words) Bill Wilson’s “biblically vague” 12 Steps. 2 It both abuses the Scriptures and reinterprets Wilson.
    In these foundational steps, Wilson is summarizing his beliefs based upon his experiences as a “recovering alcoholic.” He felt “powerless” because he believed alcoholism was an incurable disease that consequently made his life “unmanageable.” Since he couldn’t “cure” himself (although millions do without 12-Step or other therapies!), he put his faith in “a power greater than ourselves,” whom he called God, and “understood” Him by fabricating Him out of beliefs discovered in his study of different religions and religious experiences. That’s more than “biblically vague.” It’s a false religion.
    So why would Celebrate Recovery or the multitudes of other Christianized 12-Steps groups try to reconcile the Word of God with Wilson’s definitely erroneous and demonically inspired methodology? The deluded response is: “Because it works!” But does it?
    Pragmatism is the fuel that powers “the way that seems right” and governs much of what is being lauded in the church today. Not only is this unbiblical, but too often there is nothing beyond enthusiastic testimonials to support the claim that something actually works. The reality for the 12-Steps program of A.A. and N.A. is that there is no research evidence proving that they are more effective than other treatments. Furthermore, the most extensive studies related to “addictions” conclude that most drug and alcohol abusers recover without any psychotherapeutic treatment or self-help therapies. 3
    The many problems inherent within a Christianized 12-Steps program—and particularly   Celebrate   Recovery—are too numerous for this brief article. Yet, consider these observations: CR is highly promoted as completely biblical and not psychological, yet the key speakers for CR Summit 2005 were clinical psychologists Drs. John Townsend and Henry Cloud. Psychologist David Stoop, the editor of Life Recovery Bible(CR participants’ mandatory paraphrase Bible, polluted with psychotherapy commentary), is a favorite speaker at Saddleback’s CR Large Group meetings. The CR leadership manual advises, “Have Christian psychotherapists volunteer their time to help instruct and support your leaders.” 4
    CR’s entire program content is marbled with psychobabble such as this “solution” from its Adult Children of the Chemically Addicted group’s dogmas: “The solution is to become your own loving parent....You will recover the child within you, learning to accept and love yourself.” 5This is biblical?! Honoring the psychologically contrived “disorder” of codependency, CR’s Codependency and Christian Living group made this humanistic and biblically false statement: “Jesus taught....A love of self forms the basis for loving others.” 6
    A.A.’s 12-Steps methodology, along with its antibiblical psychotherapeutic concepts and practices permeates Celebrate Recovery, yet no one at the Summit with whom I spoke seemed concerned. CR’s small group meetings are the antithesis of the way the Bible instructs mature believers to help those young or struggling in the faith to grow. Pastors and elders can be small group leaders, but not for teaching purposes. No leader may biblically instruct or correct but may only affirm the “transparency” of the participant sharing his feelings. “Cross-talk,” or comments by others, are prohibited to allow the freest expression possible. Much of this “expression” reinforces psychotherapeutic myths. The two-hour meetings usually open with the spiritually anemic Serenity Prayer and the recitation of the 12 Steps. Leaders are drawn from those who have completed one or more 12-Step groups. Some leaders work through one “addiction” in a small group while leading another group. It’s not unusual for a leader to put in eight to ten hours in CR functions per week, every week. Serious Bible study and discipleship are not part of the Celebrate Recovery “biblical” emphasis.
    Let no one think that presenting these critical concerns about Celebrate Recovery in any way lessens the biblical obligation (Gal 6) of the church to minister to those struggling with habitual sin. The issue is not whether we should minister, but how we should minister: man’s way or God’s way? Man’s way, or a mixture of biblical teaching and ungodly counsel , is contrary to God’s way. Man’s way leads to death. Applying Scripture to man’s way leads to a slower death, akin to what would result when pure water is added to a toxic drinking fountain. We desperately need to take heed to God’s admonition through the Prophet Jeremiah: “For my people have committed two evils; they have forsaken me the fountain of living waters, and hewed them out cisterns, broken cisterns, that can hold no water” (Jer:2:13). TBC
    Endnotes
    1. Celebrate Recovery Summit 2005 Handbook, 61.
    2. Celebrate Recovery Senior Pastor Support Video, 2003.
    3. The Harvard Mental Health Letter, Vol. 16, No. 12, 1-4; See also: www.stats.org/issuerecord.jsp?issue=true&ID=8.
    4. Celebrate, 31.
    5. Ibid., 342.
    6. Ibid., 350.____________________________________________________________________________
    Psychoheresy Awareness Ministries has several articles dealing with the 12 Step Programs & Alcoholics Anonymous:

    Men of Mud Blog has two extensive articles:

    Rejoice Now of the Netherlands has an English translated article:

    Addiction Recovery Ministry has a PDF article that is very good:
    Excerpt:
    "I do not believe that CR should be “yoked” with 12 Steps because it is heretical. I also believe that Pastor 
    Warren recognizes that this is true, which is why he has attempted to insert “Jesus” into the 12 Steps
    program and applied biblical verses to the steps. What exactly is the point of starting with a program that 
    is decidedly unbiblical and try to “Christianize” it with Biblical jargon? Why not simply teach directly from 
    the Bible and tell people about the transformational power of the gospel (What the Church has done for
    thousands of years). Yes, the gospel liberated people from their sin before 12 Steps and it will continue 
    to do so until Christ’s return. 
    It is my firm conviction that programs, like 12 Steps and Celebrate Recovery, add to the gospel. The 
    gospel of Jesus Christ is not based on steps, meetings, or principles but belief in God and obedience to 
    His word. This is the true message that needs to be part of recovery from habitual sin, like those 
    practiced by people living with an addiction. Yes, administrators of 12 Steps programs sincerely desire to 
    help those in the programs they facilitate. And yes, I believe that Pastor Warren loves people and desires 
    that attendees of CR experience victory over addiction. However, true freedom is only found in Jesus 
    Christ and is not the product of steps, meetings, and programs."

    Perfect Peace Plan blog has a thorough analysis with other links to authors condemning "Celebrate Recovery":

    Know God's Word blog has their critique:






    POPE FRANCIS-THE ANTICHRIST IN OUR MIDST-THE PROOF


    BEREAN BEACON HAS MADE A NEW VIDEO PRESENTING A COMPELLING CASE:
    With Pope Francis enthroned as Pontiff of Rome, it is time to ask, “Who is the Antichrist in our midst?” Pope Francis is called “the most holy Roman Pontiff” and the Vicar of Christ. In this video, Richard Bennett, together with W. J. Mencarow, analyze the topic using scripture and history. The conclusion is that only the Lord God could have described beforehand the office of the Papacy of the Roman Catholic Church. That a power claiming to act for God, yet flouting His truth and mocking His very Holiness, defies imagination. Nonetheless, fraud and false pretenses have ruled the world for ages, from the very same seven-hilled city where Pope Francis now reigns. This DVD is professionally made. Exact scriptural quotations, together with photographs and paintings, illustrate and document the fact that the Pope’s office is indeed the Antichrist in our midst. Kindly make this DVD known to others by forwarding its URL.
    Thank you,
    Richard Bennett (EX CATHOLIC PRIEST)


    Saturday, July 13, 2013

    UPDATE ON STREET EVANGELIST TONY MIANO



    Christian Concern http://www.christianconcern.com/, (legal center) of the UK defended Tony Miano after his arrest for alleged "homophobic speech" while witnessing and preaching publicly in Wimbledon.
    See YouTube video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KMmq84eBM8k.

    Here is Tony's letter to Parliament: http://www.crossencounters.us/2013/07/tonys-letter-to-parliment.html, with full unedited text below:

    Thursday, July 4, 2013


    Tony's Letter to Parliament

    Dear__________

    I am writing to you because I was arrested on a London high street on Monday (1st July) for preaching from the Bible. I believe my arrest has great significance in light of the current passage of the Government's Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill.

    I was arrested under Section 5 of the Public Order Act for using "homophobic" language which was deemed offensive. The language I used was not homophobic, as I was not promoting fear or hatred of homosexuals. I was simply explaining a passage in the Bible which speaks of sexual immorality and that people should abstain from it (1 Thessalonians 4:1-12). I did not speak solely about homosexuality as a form of sexual immorality but also about any kind of sex outside of marriage between one man and one woman, as well as lustful thoughts. All of these are considered mainstream Christian positions and have been taught and believed by Christians for thousands of years.

    After being questioned by police officers on the street, I was taken to the local police station and arrived there at 4:50PM. Here I was searched, my property was removed from me and my camera was booked as evidence. I was then photographed, a sample of my DNA was taken and my fingerprints were taken. I was placed in a cell with a toilet but no toilet paper. The investigating officer offered me a £90 ticket which would ensure my immediate release and an assurance that I would be able to return to the country (I am a US citizen). He told me my solicitor was on the way to the station and I said I would like to wait to talk to him before making a decision.
    Later in the evening, I met my solicitor and with him present I was interviewed by the investigating officer. I was advised that the interview was being recorded and that I could refuse to answer questions but that this may be held against me in court. The investigator asked me to give my account of what happened before asking specific questions. He asked me, among other things, whether I believed homosexuality was a sin. He also asked me: "So if someone you knew as a homosexual came up to you and asked you for a favor, you'd quite happily offer them that favor would you?"

    It was unnerving to be questioned about my Christian beliefs and I was made to feel that my thoughts could be held against me. The two final questions were: "Do you believe you are 100 per cent right in what you did today?" (I answered yes) and: "If you were to go back there tomorrow, would you do the same thing again?" to which I also answered yes.

    After the interview my solicitor had a conversation with the investigating officer outside of my hearing. When my solicitor returned, he told me that the investigating officer said my answers to the last two questions left him no choice but to seek prosecution. I was then advised by my solicitor that I would likely spend up to 24 hours in jail and that I would go before the magistrate the following day. He also advised me that while the magistrate could allow me to return to the United States, he could order me to stay in the United Kingdom until the completion of the trial, which could be three to four months. After that I was escorted back to my cell. I was then given, upon request, a Bible to read - the very book whose teachings led to my arrest!

    An hour or so later, the investigating officer entered my cell and told me the inspector had decided to release me with no further action. At midnight I was released from jail, after just over seven hours in custody. I asked the desk sergeant if I could donate Bibles to the station. He welcomed the offer and said I could leave them with the desk officer at the front of the station. My solicitor then drove me to my place of residence.

    I felt I should write and inform you of these events, since it was very distressing to be arrested and interrogated for openly expressing my deeply held Christian beliefs. I began my message by assuring the people that mine was not a message of hate but of love.

    I don't expect you to share my beliefs but think you will agree that I, and everybody else, should have the freedom to express those beliefs without fear of reprisals from the Government. My freedom was taken away from me simply because someone didn't like what I said. Now that your nation has begun down this slippery slope, where will it end? Will people one day be arrested for disagreeing with the political party in power? And what assurance will the people have that it will stop with speech? It did not stop with speech in 1930s Germany. Many of your countrymen sacrificed their lives to end the tyranny that began with the abandonment of free speech. Nations that do not learn from history are destined to repeat it.

    For these reasons I urge you to do what you can to halt the Bill's progress before freedom of speech is not just shut down on the streets (as it was for me) but also in churches, universities, schools and homes.

    Please be assured of my prayers for God's blessing on you in your important role as a public servant.
    Yours sincerely

    Tony Miano
    _____________________________________________________________________

    Police Interrogation of Tony Miano (Transcript)

    http://www.crossencounters.us/2013/07/police-interrogation-of-tony-miano.html,
    Full unedited text below:

    Tony Miano Interview with Police
    Rough Draft of Transcription
    Date of Interview: 1 July 2013
    Date of Transcription: 4 July 2013


    Note:
    Tony Miano in Italics
    Police Interviewer in Regular Script
    Michael Phillips, solicitor for Mr. Miano italicized and capped by “LR:”

    Begin:

    This interview is being tape recorded, and... [unclear] Wimbledon police station. And there are no other officers present. We are at Interview Room Three at Wimbledon Police Station... and I am interviewing... Could you please state your name and date of birth?

    Anthony Edward Miano, date of birth is Feb 22, 1964.

    Thank you very much, also present is?

    LR: Michael Phillips, [unclear] legal representative.

    Thank you very much. The date is the first of July, 2013 and the term is 21:08, so 9:08 in the evening. Okay. So, Tony this interview is being tape recorded so should this ever go to court one of the tapes will be sealed and it can be used in evidence should this ever get that far.

    Understood. 

    Okay, Brilliant. At the time of your arrest today, by PC Green, which was at 16:50, you were cautioned by him. Do you remember that? Do you remember him saying something along those lines? You’re under arrest and hence I’m cautioning you? Do you remember that?

    You’ll have to define cautioning.

    Basically what it means is he would have said something, I can repeat it to you, and you tell me if you recognize it. He would have said to you, you do not have to say anything but it may harm your defense if we later rely on this in court. Anything you do say may be given evidence.

    Okay. 

    Also I appreciate this isn’t your country of origin and you haven’t been arrested before by us. So I will explain caution to you, okay? The first part is, I’ll break it down into three parts, okay? The first part is you don’t have to say anything. Okay, that is your legal right in this country, you can sit here in silence if you want for this interview. I’m going to ask you some questions so if you do wish to take that right then I would appreciate it if you could just say no comment. The reason for that is at least I know one, you’ve at least understood the question and two, you’ve heard it.

    I understand.

    Okay. The second part is, should you not say anything here, and give a defense should this ever go to court, the court might, may draw its own conclusions, sorry, as to why you didn’t just tell me now. Okay?

    Understood.

    And the last bit is, as I said to you in the beginning, this interview is being tape recorded. One of these tapes will be sealed, and should this ever go to court that seal will remain around it until the court and be opened in front of your legal representation and the criminal prosecution service, okay, and they can play it in court as evidence. Okay?

    I understand.

    Okay, happy to understand caution?

    I do. 

    Brilliant. Are you happy? [directed to legal representation]

    LR: I’m pleased.

    Marvelous, alright. As I said to you earlier on, you were arrested by PC Green at 16:50 for a Section 5 Public Order Act with a homophobic aggravating factor. Okay? Do you want to tell me what you were doing outside Centre Court Shopping Center today at that time?

    I was preaching the Gospel. 

    Okay. Were you by yourself?

    I was with several friends, a few from the United States and a few from here in the London area.

    Okay, and how long have you been preaching the Gospel for?

    In totality?

    I’m sorry, as in in this country, as in recently?

    During this visit since June 22nd.

    So since June 22nd, okay yeah. Sorry just to make you aware as well I will be making notes nothing to worry about just for my benefit later on.

    I understand.

    You’ve been here since June 22nd, is that right?

    Yes.

    Okay, and you’ve been preaching the Gospel. Is there any specific part of the Gospel you were preaching?

    All of it. 

    Okay, and you’re starting from the beginning and working your way through?

    Yes, I will preach through different passages of Scripture. And part of proclaiming the Gospel is sharing the law of God, bringing people to a knowledge of their sin so that they will understand their need for a savior. 

    Okay. With regards to the group of people. Is it, would you, break it up into sections and do a bit each or would you do do the whole book and someone else would do the whole Gospel? Or does it how does it work?

    Each person preaches basically until they’re done. They preach the Gospel message as they feel so lead to do. And then someone else would start from the beginning and preach their own message.

    Okay, and obviously, one of the things that caused a scene was the cameras. Do you film there?

    Yes.

    What’s the purpose of filming the preaching?

    For our own protection, for one, just in case accusations are made against us. 

    Like this.

    Like this, yes. Just in case there’s any type of physical assault against us, so that we can document that as well. Also for the edification of other Christians. We use these videos to train other Christians how to share the Gospel. So those are basically the reasons. 

    Okay. So if we talk about sort of the incident surrounding your arrest. Okay, do you remember specifically what happened when you were arrested? All of the events leading up to your arrest? Anything stand out as the reason why you think you were arrested? Not necessarily that you agree with why you were arrested I just want.

    LR: [unclear] if you could just give the lead up to what happened?

    Sure, I was preaching from a passage of Scripture in 1 Thessalonians Chapter 4.

    You have to let me write that down.

    Sure.

    1 Thessalonian...

    Chapter 4.

    Thank you.

    I believe the passage was verse 1 through I think verse 11 or 12.

    Verse 1 through to 11/12.

    In that passage of Scripture, the apostle Paul encourages the Thessalonians to abstain from all forms of sexual immorality. And to live a holy life, that is consistent with a life devoted to God and the holiness of God.

    Okay, so you were preaching this chapter, or these verses from this chapter?

    Right.

    Okay, and then what happened?

    And I was preaching about various forms of sexual immorality. Both homosexual and heterosexual, including fornication, which is sex prior to marriage. 

    Okay.

    And including adultery, not only the cheating on a spouse but also looking at someone with lust. For Jesus said whoever looks at a person to lust after them, that person has already committed adultery with that person in their heart. And that all forms of sexual immorality is sin in the eyes of God. Sin that God will judge, but sin that also God will forgive. Now, prior to being able to get to the good news of the Gospel, I was stopped. So I was still working my way through the law of God and the consequences of sin, before I, I was stopped before I could get to the good news of how someone could receive forgiveness for that sin and the free gift of eternal life through faith in Jesus Christ.

    Okay. And you were stopped by? Do you remember who stopped you?

    Well Officer Green, Constable Green. There were several officers with him, I didn’t get all their names. One officer was named Ed.

    Yeah, that would be PC Green.

    Okay, who else am I thinking of? Officer Green was the officer who brought me in?

    Yeah, his name is Ed yeah.

    Oh well there was another officer.

    Yeah, it would be PC Bailey [unclear] I would imagine. But, prior to your arrest, do you remember anyone who may have made any comments to you taking exceptions as to your comment?

    Yes.

    Okay, talk me through what happened in that instance.

    Well, first there was an older gentleman who told me F off. I won’t say exactly what he said. But told me to F off as he was getting on the bus behind me. And then a woman, presumably, the woman who apparently called the police, she likewise told me to F off as she was walking into the mall and I don’t recall exactly what I said to her. But at one point I asked, I would love to dialogue with you about this.

    Okay.

    And that’s when she walked into the mall and she came back down a short time later. It looked like she was filming with her phone [unclear]. And shortly after the police arrived.

    Okay, the lady in question, I would make the assumption, I haven’t met her, but I would make the assumption, as you have, that she is the complainant in that instance. She, I won’t bore you, well I say bore you, but I won’t read [unclear] the whole statement because it just details the fact that she was there, at around today’s date outside Center Court Shopping Centre at around 2:30. Okay? She says that she was a pedestrian, so she was on foot. Okay, and she walked out of the shopping center exit near to Wimbledon train station. Is that in relation to where you were, do you feel?

    That Wimbledon train station is over the hill from where we were. We were standing...

    There is an entrance just by the center court entrance.

    Oh there is? I wasn’t aware of that. The entrance I’ve always come out of...

    The one at the top?

    The one across the street from my favorite restaurant out here. [unclear restaurant name] I didn’t know there was one closer to the actual mall.

    Okay well yea, I mean.

    I just recall her walking down the hill in our direction, in my direction, and then walking towards the center court? [unclear] Yeah, she was walking toward that entrance.

    And at about 2:30 the first time she recognized you, she thought nothing of it at the time. Her intention was to go out to try and obtain tickets for tennis.

    At 2:30?

    Yeah, she came back at half past four and this is when the incident occurred in your direction. She’s just detailing how the incident occurred. Sorry, it was at ten past four. She says that she walked back down to the entrance to centre court, which is the shopping centre, not center court tennis, and she noticed that what she described as a male who had originally been speaking about God on the microphone was now filming another male in a red t-shirt. Does that sound about right to you?

    Well, my friend who [unclear], he was filming the preaching.

    I mean your t-shirt is burgundy.

    Yeah, it’s not a t-shirt but that was me.

    She says again thinking nothing of it, she walked by. She got about five metres from the man in the red t-shirt and she heard him say, “homosexuality is a sin, we all know it’s wrong.” Did you say that?

    Words to that effect, yes. 

    Okay, she says she was extremely offended by this, which caused her a lot of distress. She said the microphone the man was speaking into was attached to a loudspeaker and could be heard by a large captive audience. She said she mouthed, “f... you.”

    I’m glad she admitted to that.

    Yes, and she says, for the benefit of this we are going to say you are, was there anyone else wearing a red t-shirt?

    No it was me. 

    Okay, so she says that you said this, and you said, “tell me to fuck off, will you come and have a discourse with me?”

    I said words to that effect, that I would like to have a dialogue with you. 

    Okay.

    I wouldn’t have used the word discourse.

    Okay. She says that she was with another person who was around [unclear], she saw that she was angry and took her by the arm and led her away. They apparently went to have a discussion about it. And she said due to the man making homophobic statements, saying homophobic statements in the public place, that she felt an offense had been committed and she called the police. While she was waiting for them to arrive, she said you said, “God wants the world to be ordered as one man and one woman, heterosexuality. Homosexuality, lesbianism, and fornication is wrong. God knows that, you know that. Will any man here man up and agree with me or that girl earlier?”

    That’s not what I said.

    That’s not what you said.

    No, particularly at the end. 

    Okay.

    I did use the phrase, “man up.”

    So you said, “man up.”

    Right, but that is in reference to a man who had walked by and cursed at me. And I asked, in general, when will the men of this community, man up and stand by their convictions? Basically come and talk to me instead of just coming by and cursing me. I didn’t say when will people man up and agree with me. I didn’t say that. 

    So you just wanted to...

    I wanted, men to instead of whispering as they’re walking by, to stop and to have a dialogue and to stand by their convictions and actually talk about it.

    Okay. So basically as you said earlier, to spread God’s word in a sense. You wanted essentially to teach, well I can’t remember the exact words earlier on, but you know, preach the Gospel.

    Yes. 

    So, she also says that these, I can’t even pronounce it, vitriolic statements, again caused me alarm and distress. And she says, while this was happening, a man with a gray [unclear] started to film her reactions to the words. She said that she felt intimidated by that. And that’s basically, she just goes on to describe you. She says a white male, overweight.

    He is, he’s working on it though. 

    Well, no. She actually says the red t-shirt. I wouldn’t suggest you’re overweight. [cordial laughter]

    Oh, I am too. I need to lose some weight myself. 

    She says about late to mid 50s.

    [unclear] Wow, close, that’s pretty much. 

    She’s a bit harsh. American accent and she said she’s never seen you before. And she said it last about 5-10 minutes. Okay, so I’ve read you the statement, what do you think about that? How do you feel about what she said?

    I feel she was trying to intimidate us by filming us. 

    Yeah.

    So it’s interesting that she said she was intimidated by being filmed. The camera was, I don’t recall how long the camera was actually on her because I was preaching, but I do distinctly recall her, her, filming me. And saying to her that I hope she will watch the video and listen to it and come to repentance and faith in Christ. Or words to that effect.

    And what was your... I appreciate you saying this to me earlier. What was your sole intention by doing this today?

    My sole intention, my faith, my Christian faith teaches me to love God with all of my heart, soul, mind and strength, and to love my neighbor as myself. There is nothing more loving that I will ever do for another human being than to warn them of God’s wrath to come against sin and point them to the only one who could forgive their sin, and that’s Jesus Christ. 

    Okay.

    So my intent was to love people with the Gospel. 

    Okay, and you believe through, your, your religion, that homosexuality is a sin?

    Yes, I do. 

    How do you feel... Members of the public may feel?

    [unclear interruption] LR: Can we just, I think it’s important just to say, to distinguish between homosexuality as an individual, and the sin itself. Would you be able to just distinguish between that. Is a homosexual person evil, they have...

    No, a person who tells a lie, a person who steals, a person who harbors bitterness or resentment or hatred in their heart, a person who is discontent with what God has given them in their life and covets what other people have, a person who takes God’s name in vain, who is selfish, a person, if a person sins against God they face the same righteous judgement from God as any person committing any other sin. 

    Okay.

    LR: So what, just to recall the distinction between the act itself and person who has the inclination to do the act. So they’re not the same. You’re not saying that person is an evil person just because they have an inclination to be homosexual. For that reason alone.

    I’m not sure I understand the question. The point is that all of us have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God. That’s why when I was speaking out there today, I wasn’t speaking exclusively about homosexuality. I was speaking about fornication of any kind. Heterosexual fornication, heterosexual adultery, looking at a person with lust, whether or not you’re married, any form of sexual immorality is a sin before God. 

    Okay. Let me give you an example just for my benefit. You’ll have to excuse my ignorance regarding religion. You know... If two males walked past you holding hands, and in your view apparently homosexuals, would you consider them a sinner?

    Yes.

    Okay, that is what I wanted to know. So in that sense of the word, in that respect, do you feel what you were doing today, preaching the gospel, making the comments about homosexuality being a sin, do you think that that could have upset people?

    I think it could upset people because people love their sin. I think if someone walked by when I was talking about lying, and they had just lied, someone would be upset with that. I think if I was talking about hating another person and someone was harboring hatred in their heart towards someone else, they could be upset with that. That’s because people do not like to hear that they have sinned against a holy God. 

    Okay, the issue as well is that not everyone is religious, so not everyone would see homosexuality as a sin, would they?

    I don’t think that’s relevant. Because God sees it as a sin.

    No? Okay. [unclear]

    We don’t determine... excuse me?

    So you [unclear] are you offended by it because you are religious?

    Am I offended by what?

    By homosexuality.

    Homoesexuals don’t do anything to me. 

    No.

    They offend God. Just as...

    Okay. It doesn’t offend you.

    Just as my sin offends God.

    It doesn’t offend you?

    No. I harbor no bitterness or resentment...

    Okay.

    Toward homosexuals or...

    That’s basically what I was getting at. You don’t have any, you don’t have any...

    I don’t have any anger towards them. 

    And you never discriminate against them?

    No.

    So if someone you knew as a homosexual came up to you and asked you for a favor, you'd quite happily offer them that favor would you?

    The word of God tells me to love your neighbor as myself. 

    Okay.

    So if a homosexual walked up to me and said, I’m hungry and I need something to eat. I would walk them to the nearest restaurant, give them something to eat, and share the Gospel with them because I love them. 

    Okay, so. Tell me what you were doing today then. It’s apparent from this statement we have, that you have upset someone. Okay. She’s saying that what you said she found distressing, okay? Someone else has told you to “F off” as you put it. A gentleman, so whatever you were saying at that time people obviously found distressing I don’t know.

    There’s also, according to the definition of terms we’re using, it’s kind of distressing to tell someone to F off, isn’t it? 

    Well I’d agree with you, a hundred percent. Because as far as I understand, swearing in a public place, isn’t acceptable, yeah?

    I agree.

    Yeah. Obviously I can only work with the information I’m given today.

    Sure, I understand. I’m not looking for a pound of flesh from anyone. 

    No no no, I appreciate that.

    I’m not looking for any retribution.

    I can assure that if you had told me at the time that she had told you to F off the same thing would have happened to her. Because as far as I’m concerned, two wrongs don’t make a right.

    I appreciate that. 

    The issue obviously as well, is, well, you know, I appreciate what you’re saying regarding your beliefs and the fact that you were preaching the Gospel. As I said to you earlier, not everyone is religious. Okay, so they don’t have an understanding as you, as you obviously as you do of the Gospel.

    Right.

    I certainly don’t. So, do you accept that what you were saying, is likely to upset some people.

    No, I don’t accept that. Because I’ve also seen people with tears in their eyes come to repentance and faith in Jesus Christ, realizing that they’ve sinned against God. Regardless, my understanding is that what the word of God says about the nature of man is that regardless of what a person expresses with their mouth, or with their demeanor, or with their body language, even if they would say that they were offended or insulted does not necessarily mean that’s the case. It could very well be that they’ve been convicted but their heart and they don’t want the preacher to see that. 

    Okay.

    And that’s always my hope. 

    Okay.

    My hope is that that lady will go home tonight and she will turn from her sin and put her trust in Jesus Christ the Lord for her salvation. That one day I will get to worship with her side by side in heaven. 

    Okay. And, last question I’ve got for you, is do you think what you did was acceptable in a public place...

    Absolutely.

    With, I don’t know how many people walking past you during the day bearing in mind the tennis championships are on, do you feel that what you did, making the comments you made, is 100% acceptable in a public place?

    Not only 100% acceptable, but commanded by God.

    Okay.

    I’m commanded by God to love people and to proclaim the Gospel to as many people as I can for as long as I can.

    Will you do this again tomorrow?

    If I have the opportunity, yes.

    Okay. Okay. I’m quite happy about, I’ve asked the questions I need to ask. This is your interview, so this is your opportunity to give your account of what happened today leading up to your arrest, anything else you wish to, you think’s relevant to the case. This is your opportunity to give it so I will offer you the opportunity now before I turn the tapes off. Is there anything else you would like to add?

    I don’t think so, I think we’ve covered everything. 

    LR: Just a couple questions I had. What would you say to anybody that said you were trying to insult people.

    I would say they’re wrong. 

    LR: And why would you say that?

    The reason for being out there. The reason I flew all the way from Southern California to London, was to love people and share the Gospel with them. I hope to be used by God to see people come to repentance and faith in Jesus Christ. There’s never intent to insult, there’s never any intent to inflame. Of course people aren’t going to agree with everything I say, just as I don't agree with everything other people say. But my intention, is, to love people as others loved me and shared the Gospel with me so that I could receive forgiveness of my sin and the free gift of eternal life. That’s why I came to London last year during the Olympics. That’s why I came this year to Wimbledon. And that’s why I hope I can come back as many times as possible. Because I love this country and I love the people of this country. And I don’t want to see anybody perish in their sin. 

    LR: And [unclear] just about the cultural context. Some people might want to say, well that’s America that’s more religious. This country is less religious. What would you have to say?

    Well, certainly regarding the issue at hand there’s no difference between our two countries, culturally. I’m not uninformed as to where your country is regarding this issue because my country is in the same place. And the message I brought today, and the message I’ve brought about many different subjects are no different than the messages I preach to the people in my own country. Because the issues are all the same. 

    Okay, fair enough. Yeah, happy?

    LR: Yeah.

    Okay, as I’ve said, I’ve got nothing else to ask you. Obviously I’ve covered everything I need to cover. We’ll just establish that you don’t feel like you’ve done anything wrong. You’ve come over here, you’ve come to share your love of God. You’ve come to share, to preach the Gospel to people...

    All people. 

    Yeah, certainly not going to say that it’s only certain people. And you know, you feel that what you’ve done is not necessarily upsetting people but in fact helping people. Would you agree with that?

    Yes. 

    So, I appreciate your views on it. Okay. Is there anything else you wish to say?

    Not at this time. 

    Okay, brilliant. In that case, this interview is concluded at 21:34, on the first of July 2013.

    [End.]
    ________________________________________________________________________