Translate

Tuesday, September 10, 2019

THE HORRIFYING FETAL BODY PARTS MARKET~DEATH ON DEMAND: THE NEW DEMOCRAT POSITION ON ABORTION

THE BRAINWASHING OF STUDENTS IN UNIVERSITIES & COLLEGES INTO THE LIBERAL, GLOBALIST MINDSET TOWARDS "POPULATION CONTROL" FOR THE SAKE OF ALLEGED "SUSTAINABILITY" OF THE PLANET
KAITLIN BENNETT OF INFOWARS INTERVIEWS THEM

The Horrifying Fetal Body Parts Market
THE HORRIFYING FETAL BODY PARTS MARKET
 Learn about one of America’s darkest secrets
BY JON BOWNE
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Since the 1973 U.S. Supreme Court decision Roe Vs. Wade, the abortion debate has been a controversial battleground met by a host of philosophies, religions, and science.
But while the dispute raged on, an underground industry of the sale of fetal body parts grew until it reached discovery and prosecution.
New investigations have uncovered horrific middlemen procurement businesses selling baby parts like you would sell a cow or a pig.
The left has proudly championed the right to accelerate the demise of the innocent while continuing to sell the public on the facade that its party protects those who cannot speak for themselves.
But nothing could be further from the truth.
________________________________________________________

“RIPPING BABIES STRAIGHT FROM THE MOTHER’S WOMB”: TRUMP BLASTS DEMOCRAT SUPPORT FOR INFANTICIDE

“Virtually every top Democrat… now supports late-term abortion,” President noted

BY ADAN SALAZAR
SEE: https://www.infowars.com/ripping-babies-straight-from-the-mothers-womb-trump-blasts-democrat-support-for-infanticide/republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
President Trump on Monday slammed Democrat support for infanticide during a rally in Fayetteville, North Carolina, Monday night, specifically calling attention to Gov. Ralph Northam’s (D-Va.) despicable comments about post-birth abortions.
“Virtually every top Democrat also now supports late-term abortion,” the president said. “Ripping babies straight from the mother’s womb, right up to the moment of birth.”
Trump added that Gov. Northam’s comments about post-birth abortions were indicative of how far-left the party has gone on the issue.
“And if you look at Virginia, the governor of Virginia, he was even talking about essentially, you would say an execution. He was talking after the baby is born, the doctor will talk to the mother and they’ll make a decision as to whether or not that baby lives. This is a radical Democrat idea! That’s why I’ve asked Congress to prohibit extreme late-term abortion because Republicans believe that every child is a sacred gift from God.”
Northam back in January went on radio station WTOP and defended a 40-week abortion ban proposed by the state’s Democrats. 40 weeks is typically considered the end term of a pregnancy, but Northam offered an example in which a baby would be brought to term, delivered, then parents and doctors would decide whether it would stay alive.
“If a mother is in labor, I can tell you exactly what would happen. The infant would be delivered. The infant would be kept comfortable. The infant would be resuscitated if that’s what the mother and the family desired, and then a discussion would ensue between the physicians and the mother.”
On Tuesday, fact-check site Politifact deemed President’s Trump’s comments correctly reflecting Gov. Northam’s statements “false.”
 Follow the author on Gab: https://gab.ai/adansalazar

_______________________________________________________________

Death on Demand: The New Democrat Position on Abortion

BY JAMES MURPHY
SEE: https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/item/33375-death-on-demand-the-new-democrat-position-on-abortionrepublished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
For Democrats, the days of “safe, legal and rare” on the abortion issue are in the distant past. Perhaps, their new motto should be, “whenever, wherever and however.” In the new Democrat Party, abortion is being touted as not only an effective and even preferred method of birth control, but also as a primary component in their plan to fight climate change.
Asked whether he would be “courageous enough” to address population control as it relates to climate change, Senator Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) was more than ready to connect climate change to abortion/population control. “So, I think, especially in poor countries around the world, where women do not necessarily want to have large numbers of babies and where they can have the opportunity to birth control to control the number of kids they have is something I very, very strongly support.”
Sanders also ranted about the Mexico City Agreement, a government policy that denies funding to non-American NGOs that perform abortions or offer counseling for them. Republican administrations typically follow the policy, while Democrat presidents do not. “And the Mexico City Agreement, which denies American aid to those organizations around the world that are — that allow women to have abortions or even get involved in birth control is totally absurd,” Sanders said.
It seems to me that Sanders is not only proposing abortion as a means of population control in “poor countries” but is suggesting that we use U.S. taxpayer funds to do so. Yet, he has the gall to call Donald Trump a racist?
And just so you don’t think that Senator Sanders is the only Democrat who has dived into the issue, Mayor Pete Buttigieg has gone on record declaring that abortions should be allowed until a baby takes his or her first breath. Buttigieg also absurdly claims that his position is biblical.
“There’s a lot of parts of the Bible that talk about how life begins with breath,” Buttigieg said in an interview on The Breakfast Club radio show. “No matter what you think about the cosmic question of how life begins, most Americans can get on board with the idea of, ‘I might draw the line here, you might draw the line there.' The most important thing is the person who should be drawing the line is the woman making the decision.”
With his “life begins at breath” pronouncement, Buttigieg is signaling his support for extreme new abortion laws such as the New York law signed by Governor Andrew Cuomo in January. That law, the so-called Reproductive Health Act, allows abortion up until the moment of birth in the Empire State.
States' laws about abortion have seen drastic changes in 2019. Depending on the state, those laws have been both good and bad news, depending on which side of the life debate you fall on. Pro-lifers scored a huge victory in the State of Alabama when Governor Kay Ivey signed the Human Life Protection Act, which prohibits abortion in the state unless there is a serious threat to a pregnant woman’s health; if the fetus were to be stillborn or die shortly after birth or if the pregnant woman is diagnosed with a serious mental illness. The law is scheduled to go into effect in November but lawsuits by pro-abortion groups may delay it.
Other states that have passed significant pro-life legislation this year include Arkansas, Georgia, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, North Dakota, and Ohio. Most of these laws are being challenged in court by pro-abortion groups.
On the other end of the spectrum, states such as New York have passed laws assuring that babies are at risk of abortion up until the time they’re born — perhaps even after they’re born if you ask Virginia Governor Ralph Northam.
The New York Law, the Reproductive Health Act, made abortion legal at any time “when necessary to protect a woman’s life or health,” which, basically, gives women the right to ask for and abortionists the right to perform abortions at any time up until the moment of birth. The law also repealed aspects of the New York criminal code pertaining to abortion.
Democrat Governor Cuomo was so happy with his new “death bill” that he ordered the One World Trade Center lit up pink to celebrate the bill’s passage.
Vermont, Nevada, Illinois, Maine, Washington, and Virginia have all passed pro-abortion laws this year.
So, as usual, the country is split on the issue of abortion. But 2020 Democrats are staking out the most extreme pro-abortion stances they can in preparation for the coming election.
As Democrats struggle and strive to gain the acceptance and the votes of their far-left “woke” base, they risk losing ordinary citizens who struggle with issues such as abortion. While this is possibly good news in the short-term, the move to more extreme positions signals an ever-more leftward tilt in the national discussion on abortion. The GOP and pro-life advocates must be careful that they are not pulled to the left as well.
_______________________________________________________________
PETE: BIBLE SAYS LIFE STARTS 
WHEN BABY BREATHES AFTER BIRTH: 
Pete Buttigieg's 'Brother-in-Law' Says Candidate Has 'Manipulated' the Bible, Calls on Him to Repent
BY HEATHER CLARK
SEE: https://christiannews.net/2019/09/10/pete-buttigiegs-brother-in-law-says-candidate-has-manipulated-the-bible-calls-on-him-to-repent/republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
CLIO, Mich.  Rhyan Glezman, an evangelical pastor who is also the “brother-in-law” of Democratic presidential candidate Pete Buttigieg, has been speaking out after Buttigieg recently used the Bible to support his views in favor of abortion “rights,” suggesting that the Scriptures can be read by some to say that life doesn’t begin until one takes their first breath.
“My brother-in-law needs to repent from this radical false teaching,” Glezman, the senior pastor of Clio Community Church of God in Michigan, posted to social media on Friday. “God does not endorse this nonsense. Only false religion does.”
Glezman was referring to Buttigieg’s interview with “The Breakfast Club,” in which he discussed various issues, from homosexuality to religion in politics. Buttigieg is a homosexual and is “married” to Glezman’s brother, Chasten.
“[Republicans] hold everybody in line with this one piece of doctrine about abortion, which is obviously a tough issue for a lot of people to think through morally. Then again, there’s a lot of parts of the Bible that talk about how life begins with breath, and so even that is something that we can interpret differently,” Buttigieg said at one point during the radio show.
“No matter what you think about the kind of cosmic question of how life begins, most Americans can get on board with the idea of, ‘Alright, I might draw the line here; you draw the line there.’ But the most important thing is the person who should be drawing the line: … the woman making the decision,” he continued. “Since when should men be dictating what women ought to be able to do?”
Glezman says that he feels compelled to speak out about the matter in light of what Buttigieg suggested, which he believes is a “manipulation” of the Bible.
“God places a very high value on all human life,” he told the Washington Examiner. “Everyone is created fearfully and wonderfully in the image of God with intrinsic value. That doesn’t start at the first breath. It starts when we enter our mother’s womb.”
“If we’re going to say we’re for all people and we love all people, but we don’t value human life in the womb, that’s being a hypocrite,” Glezman said. “You’re hypocritical if you don’t stand up for all life. So that’s why I’m speaking out.”
Minutes after making his abortion remarks during the “Breakfast Club” interview, when asked if he believes if God cares about politics, Buttigieg said that God cares about how men treat each other. He pointed to the words of Abraham Lincoln, who said that men should seek to be on being on God’s side rather than working to get Him on their side.
“Lincoln talked about — I think during the Civil War — [how] everyone wants to call God onto their side, but we should spend less time praying to get God on our side and more time figuring out if I can get on God’s side,” Buttigieg noted. “And that’s how I come at this.”
“The funny thing about praying is that sometimes we do it in the sense of telling God what to do,” he also remarked moments later. “I think it ought to be more a process where we’re deciding how to align ourselves, how we tune our own hearts. If we’re going to pray for our politics, let’s pray for ourselves to walk in a way that is better for humanity on all sides of our politics.”
Glezman said that he loves Pete, but is concerned with Buttigieg’s use of Christian terminology to justify his liberal policies, such as those on abortion and homosexuality.
“Anyone who makes those claims, anyone who’s going to weaponize the [Bible] in that way, I would say to anyone that you need to repent. This is leading people astray and it’s very, very dangerous,” he stated.
Buttigieg commented during the interview that he believes Republicans have used “faith as a way to order people into living their lives a certain way.”
Conversely, Glezman, who suffered division in his family when he became a Christian, said that it is the liberals who are rather pressuring people of faith. He compared those such as Buttigieg to the Pharisees of Jesus’ time, as they came up with their own human rules and traditions, which superseded God’s commands and made the Word of God “of no effect” (Mark 7:13).
“In their eyes, if we don’t celebrate or endorse their marriage views or their abortion views, then all of a sudden we become the homophobic bigots, which is just not true. You can love people and have a disagreement,” he told the Washington Examiner.
“And that’s what I’m seeing with this false religion,” Glezman stated. “That’s why I compared them to the Pharisees of today, with their new laws that they’re trying to instill. And they’re saying, ‘If you don’t believe the way I do, then you’re a hateful, bigoted person; you’re homophobic, you’re anti-woman.’ It becomes this hostile division.”
He urged followers on Friday to pray for Buttigieg, and posted a Scriptural reminder on Sunday from 2 Timothy 4:3, “For the time is coming when people will not endure sound teaching, but having itching ears, they will accumulate for themselves teachers to suit their own passions.”
______________________________________________________________
New Sexual Fetish; Couples Getting Pregnant and 

Having Multiple Abortions

“My girlfriend enjoys her pregnancies and she enjoys the abortion.”
BY PAUL JOSEPH WATSON
SEE: https://summit.news/2019/09/11/new-sexual-fetish-couples-getting-pregnant-and-having-multiple-abortions/republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
A new sexual fetish has emerged where couples repeatedly get pregnant then have multiple abortions.
Every day we stray further from God’s light.
In a Reddit post entitled ‘Question regarding abortion and breeding fetish’, one user reveals how she has “a female friend who has a really powerful fetish for breeding” and never used birth control.
“She is with a male partner currently who is just like her, into breeding and they have been practising their fetish for quite a few abortions,” the post reads.
Another male respondent then shared details of his own abortion fetish lifestyle.
“I know this fetish. My girlfriend and me have the same fetish. My girlfriend enjoys her pregnancies and she enjoys the abortion. Her preferred date to abort is between 20 and 24 weeks of gestation. I enjoy making her pregnant. And I enjoy the time of her pregnancy. She has no menstrual period and she is sexually very active,” he writes.
“In the last ten years in our relationship we have done seven abortions and my girlfriend is pregnant again with a little girl,” he adds.
Another respondent then praises him for sharing his fetish, writing, “It is good (and rare) to hear of a couple (both man and woman) where both members are into abortion and pregnancy. This is a wonderful and potent example of personal power, where sex meets violence and creation combines with destruction.”
Truly sick.
Given that the left has turned abortion from something that used to be a shameful last resort into a celebrated virtue, it becoming a sexual fetish was always the next (il)logical step.
_______________________________________________________________
NURSE JILL STANEK, FIRED FOR EXPOSING 
LIVE BIRTH ABORTIONS
jill-stanek2
CHRISTIAN NURSE TELLS HER STORY
Illinois Hospital Created ‘Comfort Room’ For Aborted Babies to Die In 
Infants remained alive for hours after abortion procedure
“Before the Comfort Room was established, babies were taken to the Soiled Utility Room to die,” Stanek added in her article.
BY PAUL JOSEPH WATSON
An eyewitness nurse revealed how a hospital in Illinois has a “comfort room” in which aborted babies who survive for hours outside the womb are left to die.
Jill Stanek told a hearing on the Born Alive Act in Washington, D.C. that doctors at Christ Hospital in Oak Lawn perform “live birth abortions” where the baby is allowed to die during or after the abortion procedure.
The hospital provides “comfort care” for the babies for hours after the procedure by wrapping the infant in a blanket and keeping it warm until it dies. Parents of the baby are also allowed to hold it during this time.
“If staff did not have the time or desire to hold the baby, she was taken to Christ Hospital’s Comfort Room, which was complete with a First Photo machine if parents wanted professional pictures of their aborted baby, baptismal supplies, gowns and certificates, foot printing equipment and baby bracelets for mementos, and a rocking chair,” Stanek said.
null
She also revealed how once she witnessed a nurse deliver a live baby but then fail to clamp the severed umbilical cord, causing the baby to begin bleeding. The infant was then placed in a bag and thrown in the trash.
Stanek also related how she held a 22 week old down syndrome baby for the last 45 minutes of his life because his parents did not want to hold him.
“Toward the end, he was so quiet I could not tell if he was still alive,” Stanek said. “I held him up to the light to see through his chest wall whether his heart was still beating. After he was pronounced dead, I folded his little arms across his chest, wrapped him in a tiny shroud and carried him to the hospital morgue where all of our dead patients are taken.”
Stanek subsequently quit her job at the hospital.
Meanwhile, as I explain in the video below, a new sexual fetish involves couples repeatedly getting pregnant and aborting multiple babies.
SEE VIDEO IN POST ABOVE.
_______________________________________________________________
SEE ALSOPro-Life Nurse Fired from Christ Hospital