KAVANAUGH SENATE HEARING: REPUBLICAN PROSECUTOR, RACHEL MITCHELL, SAYS DR. FORD DOES NOT OFFER CONSISTENT ACCOUNT OF ALLEGED ASSAULT
The outside prosecutor who questioned Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh and his accuser Dr. Christine Blasey Ford released her independent assessment. One America's Stephanie Myers details her report.
Rachel Mitchell Calls Dr. Ford's Testimony into Question
"Rachel Mitchell's report is now public. The long-term prosecutor says, 'Look, something smells.' She says Ford's memories have clearly been affected by Democrats and her attorneys. That's right. This circus has influenced the accuser to the point that her story should be questioned." —Grant Stinchfield
Rachel Mitchell Points Out Massive Holes in Dr. Ford's Testimony
PROSECUTOR: KAVANAUGH ALLEGATION “WEAKER” THAN “HE SAID, SHE SAID”
Mitchell has nine issues with allegation
SEE: https://www.infowars.com/prosecutor-kavanaugh-allegation-weaker-than-he-said-she-said/; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Rachel Mitchell, the prosecutor tapped by senators to investigate Dr. Ford’s allegation against Brett Kavanaugh, said it was “weaker” than a “he said, she said” case in a report she wrote to lawmakers.
Mitchell, who has experience working sex crime cases for the Maricopa County attorney’s office, submitted a report on Sept. 30 which outlined her findings and her own independent assessment from a purely legal context.
“In the legal context, here is my bottom line: A ‘he said, she said’ case is incredibly difficult to prove, but this case is even weaker than that,” she wrote. “Dr. Ford identified other witnesses to the event, and those witnesses either refuted her allegations or failed to corroborate them.”
Mitchell brought up the following nine points she said were issues:
- Dr. Ford has not offered a consistent account of when the alleged assault happened.
- Dr. Ford has struggled to identify Judge Kavanaugh as the assailant by name.
- When speaking with her husband, Dr. Ford changed her description of the incident to become less specific.
- Dr. Ford has no memory of key details of the night in question – details that could help corroborate her account.
- Dr. Ford’s account of the alleged assault has not been corroborated by anyone she identified as having attended – including her lifelong friend.
- Dr. Ford has not offered a consistent account of the alleged assault.
- Dr. Ford has struggled to recall important recent events related to her allegations, and her testimony regarding recent events raises further questions about her memory.
- Dr. Ford’s description of the psychological impact of the event raises questions.
- The activities of congressional Democrats and Dr. Ford’s attorneys likely affected Dr. Ford’s account.
You can read the full report below:
Unfortunately, the pushback against Kavanaugh’s nomination stems from emotionally-driven politics, meaning that the legal, logical context of the report likely won’t redefine the battle lines – but it does put the context of the fight into focus.
Kavanaugh Is The Test Case For Trump Impeachment Using The #Metoo Hoax
