SAY NO TO NEIL GORSUCH FOR SUPREME COURT
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
By Kelleigh Nelson
January 25, 2017
NewsWithViews.com
January 25, 2017
NewsWithViews.com
One
of the reasons I changed — one of the primary reasons — a
friend of mine’s wife was pregnant, in this case married. She was
pregnant and he didn’t really want the baby. And he was telling
me the story,” Trump told Brody. “He was crying as he was
telling me the story. He ends up having the baby and the baby is the apple
of his eye. It’s the greatest thing that’s ever happened to
him. And you know here’s a baby that wasn’t going to be let
into life. And I heard this, and some other stories, and I am pro-life.
—Donald J. Trump
Our
45th President told us he would put pro-life judges on our Supreme Court.
However, those who helped him with the list of conservative judges were
both the Federalist Society, and the Heritage Foundation (called Heretic
Foundation by many of my well-educated friends).
Neil
Gorsuch is Not Pro-Life
The
latest choice
we’re now hearing is at the top of the list is Neil
Gorsuch. Neil Gorsuch is NOT pro-life. His selection
would violate Trump's pledge to nominate a pro-life justice to the Supreme
Court. Roe v. Wade would not be overturned for 40 years if the
49-year-old Gorsuch is picked. Forty million more babies would
be murdered in their mothers’ wombs with this choice.
The
pro-life movement has only a few hours or days to object, protest, criticize,
and veto the nomination of this pro-choice candidate. Trump floats these
trial balloons to see if people object. We must strongly object,
and please speak out loudly now.
Gorsuch
has never said or written anything pro-life. Andy Schlafly knew him in
law school and afterwards, and has reviewed his opinions and his book.
He's written multiple opinions that demonstrate he is not
pro-life.
For
example, in the case of Pino v. U.S., Gorsuch discussed whether a 20-week-old
"nonviable fetus" had the same rights as a "viable fetus."
Gorsuch, showing that he is not pro-life, indicated that his answer is
"no" unless the Oklahoma Supreme Court specifically found rights
for the "nonviable fetus." Rather than render a pro-life ruling,
Gorsuch punted this issue to the Oklahoma Supreme Court for it to decide.
Gorsuch's approach is similar to the unjust approach based on viability
that underlies Roe v. Wade.
More
information, including how Gorsuch opposes overturning precedent even
when it is wrong, is here.
He supports special rights for transgenders, too. And he is no Scalia,
as Gorsuch was not even on the Law Review in law school.
We've
been down this road before, and it doesn't work for Republican presidents.
Andy Schlafly recently spoke at a large conservative conference in Michigan,
a state Trump carried by barely 10,000 votes based on immense efforts
by pro-lifers there. That margin disappears if Trump is misled to break
his pro-life pledge for the Supreme Court.
Evangelicals
spoke out and vetoed the previous top choice, Bill Pryor. Now
it is urgent that pro-lifers speak out immediately and veto Neil Gorsuch.
These
choices are coming from the Federalist Society and Heritage Foundation.
The Federalist Society is attempting to get a pro-Roe judge chosen instead
of another Scalia.
Who
is the Federalist Society?
The
Federalist Society, is allegedly an organization of conservatives and
libertarians seeking reform of the current American legal system in accordance
with a textualistic or originalist interpretation of the U.S. Constitution.
It is one of the nation's most influential legal organizations, masquerading
as something they are not.
The
Federalist Society began at Yale
Law School, (home of Skull and Bones), Harvard
Law School (that bastion of higher liberal learning), and the University
of Chicago Law School, (home of Bill Ayers and where protestors disallowed
Trump rally). It originally started as a student organization which challenged
what its members perceived as the orthodox American liberal ideology found
in most law schools. Doesn’t this actually make you laugh when these
three Ivy league schools are known as having a Marxist agenda?
Pro-Lifers
Need to Respond
There
are ways to respond, and as my friend Devvy Kidd said, “We have
to flood the White House with calls, tweets, emails. This has worked in
the past if enough people do it.”
The
comment phone number is: 202-456-1111.
The
caller simply needs to say:
I strenuously object to Neil Gorsuch as a supreme court justice nominee. He is not pro-life. I urge President Trump to nominate:Justice Charles Canady - number one choice, or:Judge Jennifer Elrod or Judge Edith Jones
You
can also tweet Donald Trump, Kellyanne Conway, Jeff Sessions, Mike Pence,
Mike Pompeo, Sean Spicer, etc. Simply tweet, “Gorsuch is
not pro-life. Choose true pro-lifers…Charles Canady, Judge Elrod
or Edith Jones.”
You
can email the White House here.
You
can comment on Face Book here.
Another
option is to send a fax signed by as many people as possible. If people
belong to a church or some group, just do a short letter with all the
signatures and fax it. Phone calls can be ignored, but a pile of 50,000
faxes can't. Time is of the essence.
WH fax:
202-456-7890
Conclusion
It is
up to the American people to let our President know where we stand. Life
is God given, and the Lord said in Deuteronomy, CHOOSE LIFE!
Let President Trump know we want Pro-Life Justices!
______________________________________________________
