PERSECUTOR IN CHIEF: BY HIS PROCLAIMED DICTATE, CERTAIN RELIGIONS GET FULL FREEDOM; CHRISTIANS EXCEPTED
WHILE CHRISTIANS' CONSTITUTIONAL FREEDOM OF SPEECH, BELIEF & PRACTICE INFRINGED & CONTAINED
WILL YOU ACCEPT OBAMA'S
DECEPTION, LIES & HYPOCRISY?
Obama Issues Proclamation
for "Religious Freedom Day"
BY HEATHER CLARK
SEE: http://christiannews.net/2016/01/17/obama-issues-proclamation-for-religious-freedom-day/; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
WASHINGTON — As Saturday marked the 23th annual Religious Freedom Day, Barack Obama released a statement recognizing the religious rights of Americans, while some Christian leaders expressed concern over the Obama administration’s infringements upon religious rights.
Religious Freedom Day, first proclaimed nationally in 1993, is based on the enactment of the 1786 Virginia Statute on Religious Freedom. The law was drafted by Thomas Jefferson and became an influence in the crafting of the First Amendment.
The Virginia Statute declared in part that “to compel a man to furnish contributions of money for the propagation of opinions which he disbelieves is sinful and tyrannical.”
“Since our country’s founding, religious freedom has been heralded as one of our most cherished ideals,” Obama said in his proclamation.
“The right to practice religion freely has brought immigrants from all over the world to our shores, often in the face of great adversity, so they could live their lives in accordance with the dictates of their consciences,” he continued. “Some of America’s earliest settlers, the Pilgrims, arrived at our shores in search of a more tolerant society, free from religious persecution.”
Obama said that the White House has been working to protect the freedoms of Americans of all religions, and vowed to continue to do so.
“[M]y Administration is working to preserve religious liberty and enforce civil rights laws that protect religious freedom—including laws that protect employees from religious discrimination and require reasonable accommodation of religious practices on the job,” he stated.
“We will also continue to protect students from discrimination and harassment that is based on their faith, and we will continue to enforce hate crime laws, including those perpetrated based on a person’s actual or perceived religion,” Obama continued. “This work is crucial, particularly given the recent spike in reports of threats and violence against houses of worship, children, and adults simply because of their religious affiliation.”
But some pointed out the irony of Obama’s proclamation in light of his administration’s actions in recent years. Ken Ham of Answers in Genesis said that Saturday could have instead been dubbed “Religious Erosion Day.”
“Sadly, Christians are increasingly being punished for standing on God’s word and living according to our beliefs based on the Bible. We’re seeing this happen over and over again—usually in regard to gay ‘marriage’ and the sanctity of life,” he wrote in a blog post. “Christians are being forced to affirm gay ‘marriages,’ and Christian organizations and companies are being told they better provide abortion services and medical insurance that includes abortive contraceptives and even abortion—or else!”
“In a recent address Obama even said that gay ‘marriage’ trumps religious freedom!” Ham stated. “He doesn’t really support religious freedom for everyone—he supports his own definition of freedom, one that increasingly excludes Bible-believing Christians from these protections and imposes an anti-God religion on the culture.”
But he exhorted Christians to be thankful for the liberties that we still have and to not neglect to obey Christ’s command to be salt and light in our nation.
“As Christians, we need to be bold in standing on God’s word, refusing to compromise with our increasingly secular culture. We need to be salt and light, spreading the message of the good news of the gospel to this world—this is what will change hearts and minds for now and eternity,” Ham declared. “We are free from the burden of our sin and death (Romans 6:22) because of what Jesus did for us on the cross. And that is true freedom that can never be taken away by any government or legislature!”
__________________________________________________________
REMEMBER THESE CHRISTIANS DENIED THEIR FREEDOMS, JAILED & FINED:
KIM DAVIS, MUNICIPAL CLERK WHO REFUSED GAY MARRIAGE LICENSES
JAILED
MELISSA & AARON KLEIN, BAKE SHOP; BANK ACCOUNTS SEIZED, AND LEVIED HUGE FINES BY OREGON STATE
BARONELLE STUTZMAN, FLORIST WHO REFUSED FLOWERS FOR GAY WEDDING; SUED
TINA MARSHALL, DENTIST; SUED FOR PLAYING CHRISTIAN MUSIC
(Christian) Dentist Sued for Damages by Employees Allegedly Fired for Objecting to Playing Christian Music
BY HEATHER CLARK
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes
LAKE ORION, Mich. — A Michigan dentist is being sued by several of her former employees who were allegedly scolded or fired for objecting to the Christian music she played at her practice.Dr. Tina Marshall of Lake Orion is facing accusations of discrimination and violating the Michigan Civil Rights Act over the matter, which involves four former employees: Kimberly Hinson, Nancy Kordus, Tammy Kulis and Sara Bambard.According to reports, Marshall played Christian music and the local Christian radio station at her practice during business hours, and eventually left it playing overnight.“Playing the Christian music is just to keep God on your mind. It’s just soothing to the spirit,” she told the Clarkston News. “I can’t tell you how many patients I have come in and just make comments that it is so calm in here. They’re like, ‘I’m at a dentist office. This is weird.’ And we just smile.”But some of her employees were unhappy with being subjected to the music.“I told her I did not think it was right to play the music all the time, as we had a wide range of religious beliefs as patients,” Kordus said in a statement. “She told me ‘you have to plant the seeds’ and the music had to be played 24/7 even if no one was in the building ‘to keep the demons out.'”She said that several patients “questioned” the music being played, and so Kordus turned on the television instead.“So I was ‘disobedient,’” Kordus stated.The complaint against Marshall also claims that the dentist held prayer gatherings with staff each morning and also prayed over her patients. Her former employees claim that the morning prayers eventually became mandatory, but Marshall denies the allegation and says no one was ever required to pray with her.Kordus claims that she wrote to Marshall in 2014 to ask that she stop pushing her religion on others, and was soon fired. Kulis said that she resigned over the matter.Attorneys for Marshall have requested that the lawsuit be dismissed as the dentist disputes the claims.“[Marshall is] being attacked in this lawsuit for her Christian beliefs, based solely on her desire to play religious music and radio stations in the dental office of the business that she owns,” attorney Keith Jablonski told the Washington Post.“We believe that when the facts, and not baseless allegations, are presented to a jury, we will establish that this group of former disgruntled employees are simply looking to profit off of their own prejudices towards Dr. Marshall and her Christian faith,” he said._______________________________________________________SEE ALSO: http://www.oxfordleader.com/Articles-News-c-2016-01-06-260524.113121-sub14474.113121-Dentist-office-faces-lawsuit-for-alleged-religious-discrimination.html; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:January 06, 2016 - By Meg Peters Review Co-Editor Four former employees of Dr. Tina Marshall D.D.S. are seeking damages for alleged religious discrimination in a lawsuit against the Lake Orion dentist. Plaintiffs Kimberly Hinson, Nancy Kordus, Tammy Kulis and Sara Bambard are also suing Dr. Craig Stasio who helped Marshall restructure her office and its employees in 2015. Stasio is a state registered chiropractor who owns a chiropractic and massage therapy business in Clinton Township, and is also the leader of a religious ministry. The lawsuit was filed with the 6th Judicial Circuit of Oakland County. A jury trial was requested and may occur later this summer. During a restructuring of the dental office, almost all of Marshall's previous employees were fired or resigned, apart from one dental hygienist who still works for the practice. Of the plaintiffs, Hansin had worked for the practice, previously ran by Dr. Raphael Flajole, as a dental hygienist for about 32 years. Kordus began working for the practice as a dental assistant in about 1993, and Kulis at the front desk in 1994. The three became employees of Marshall when she purchased the practice in 2008. Bambard began working for Marshall in 2011 at the front desk. "My old staff was great. I wish they would have stayed and liked the music, but it was their choice," Marshall said. She is referring to the Christian music she began playing during office hours, which many of her staff had requested to turn off, and actually turned off, numerous times. According to the lawsuit Marshall began playing the Christian music after she and her daughter Brittney joined Stasio's ministry sometime in 2013. At first, the music only played during part of the day, the lawsuit states, however in time Marshall ordered the religious music be played at all times. "I told her I did not think it was right to play the music all the time, as we had a wide range of religious beliefs as patients. She told me 'you have to plant the seeds' and the music had to be played 24/7 even if no one was in the building 'to keep the demons out,'" Kordus said in a statement. Marshall said playing the music was something she wanted to do at her practice, and was not meant to influence or brainwash anybody. More importantly, it is soothing to many patients. "Playing the Christian music is just to keep God on your mind. It's just soothing to the spirit. I can't tell you how many patients I have come in and just make comments that it is so calm in here. They're like, 'I'm at a dentist office. This is weird.' And we just smile," she said. Later she explained, "This is no more than church. If you go to church, that's what they're doing, is teaching you from the Bible and trying to make you more aware of the truth from the Bible." The lawsuit also states Marshall conducted daily morning prayers with the staff members, which started off as optional but soon became mandatory for all employees. "It's never been mandatory. And it's never been more than just praying for a great day, that it runs smooth," Marshall said. The lawsuit also alleges that Marshall would pray over patients receiving dental treatment, hung religious pictures in her office, placed holy water at her front desk, and maintained a diary of religious activity that occurred at her practice. The front cover of the diary stated "The Lord is my shepherd, I shall not want." One example of an excerpt of the diary according to the lawsuit states: "Nancy and Kristen realize there is only one God and that He is real and that Hell is real too." Another example of a diary excerpt states: "Pray Holy Spirit is present over the office at all times—especially tomorrow with prayer for our patients—or seeds be planted." The lawsuit also notes that each of the plaintiffs consistently objected to the religious practices during office hours. In 2014, Kordus provided written requests that Marshall refrain from pressuring staff from participating in the ministry's religious activities, and on August 21, 2014 Kordus was fired. Kulis' employment was constructively terminated on Oct. 30, 2014, the lawsuit states, as she was compelled to leave due to the religious harassment and discriminatory practices. After a couple of her employees were terminated, Marshall had to replace them with interim employees who weren't as trained as they had claimed, Marshall said. With her current employees resisting the Christian music, and her interim employees not qualified enough, Marshall turned to Stasio. "That's when I was like this isn't working, Craig can you help me, and it worked out great," Marshall said. Marshall brought in Stasio and after two weeks the practice was restructured. Members of the religious ministry replaced the eight positions that were terminated, with the one employee remaining on as a dental hygienist. According to the lawsuit, Bambard was called into Marshall's office July 6, 2015, where she met Stasio. At that time Marshall told Bambard that Stasio was in charge, the lawsuit says. Stasio, according to the lawsuit, held up a stack of financial records to demonstrate how much control he had over the practice, and told Bambard she would be the new office manager and she would have to fire several other staff members. She claimed she was told she would also would be required to find new employees that would be accepting of the religious practices. To ensure this, Stasio participated in the hiring process, according to the lawsuit. On July 16, Hinson was fired. The lawsuit states: "Defendant Stasio was enlisted to provide the 'help' Dr. Marshall needed in terminating the staff members that objected being exposed to the practices and beliefs of the ministry. Specifically, in regards to Plaintiff's objections to the Christian music, Defendant Craig Stasio stated to a journalist: "If she wanted to put a water fountain on one side of the office, and they wanted it on the other, that can't happen." Stasio added that Dr. Marshall "felt like a prisoner in her own office and that her employees were incompetent and disobeying Dr. Marshall." The lawsuit cites three counts of discrimination in violation of the Elliott Larsen Civil Rights Act. The first count cites religious discrimination, with the other two counts alleging age discrimination, and retaliation and conspiracy under the act. According to the lawsuit, civil rights were violated when the plaintiffs were exposed to "unwelcome harassment because of their religion"; "failing to take prompt and effective action to cease the harassment"; "failing to take reasonable steps to protect plaintiffs from retaliation"; "unfairly disciplining and terminating plaintiffs because of their religion"; and "otherwise discriminating against plaintiffs with respect to the terms, conditions and privileges of employment." Stasio and Marshall have denied all claims.
