Translate

Friday, December 4, 2015

SAN BERNARDINO CALIFORNIA SHOOTING VICTIMS DEFENSELESS IN "GUN FREE ZONE"

BaconlovingFarook

"DEVOUT"
SYED FAROOK & TASHFEEN MALIK, ISLAMIC TERRORISTS 
DONNED TACTICAL GEAR & OPENED FIRE 
WITH MILITARY GRADE WEAPONS & AMMUNITION
IN THE NAME OF THE FALSE GOD ALLAH
PHOTOS OF THE TWO


LIAR IN CHIEF GETS TEARS IN HIS RED EYES FROM SORROW?
OR SOME IRRITANT HIS DOCTOR GAVE HIM?
NO PARALLEL ANYWHERE ELSE IN THE WORLD?

San Bernardino Victims Defenseless 

in “Gun-free Zone"

BY BOB ADELMANN
below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

The Inland Regional Center (shown) in San Bernardino, California, the site of the massacre of innocents by a husband and wife on Wednesday, is a gun-free zone. This guaranteed that Syed Farook and his new wife, Tashfeen Malik, would face no resistance when they shot up the holiday luncheon celebration sponsored by the San Bernardino County Health Department.
According to observers, this was a carefully planned attack. Farook attended the celebration with people he had known for five years as a health technician responsible for inspecting restaurants and pools. During the celebration there apparently erupted a disagreement sufficient to cause Farook to leave in such a rush that he left his coat behind, returning 30 minutes later with his wife, dressed in tactical clothing and carrying semi-automatic rifles, handguns, and a quantity of magazines.
Over the next ten minutes, 31 people were shot and 14 of them were killed. By the time police arrived (in an estimated four minutes after they received the first terrified 911 call), Farook and his wife had left the building. It took police another three hours to hunt them down and kill them in a firefight involving more than 20 officers.
Police said it would take a “long time” to complete their investigation into the matter: Farook’s background, recent activities, his flight to Saudi Arabia earlier this year to retrieve his wife whom he met on the Internet, his religious affiliations, and, finally, his motive.
Some of those questions already have answers as this is being written: Farook was a devout Muslim, according to his father, leaving work several times a day to attend prayers at a local mosque. He and his wife had a six-month old child whom they dropped at relatives for the morning, claiming that one of them had a doctor’s appointment.
President Obama was uncertain whether the shooting was a terrorist attack, but he apparently knew the cause: the easy availability of firearms. And his solution: tighter background checks along with closing another “loophole,” i.e., the one that allows “suspects” on the CIA’s “no-fly” list to buy firearms. The fact that background checks would be an infringement of rights guaranteed under the Second Amendment and would have failed to pick up Farook as he maintained a low profile, or that restricting “suspects” on the “no-fly” list would be illegal without proper Constitutional authority, never entered the president’s conversation. It wouldn’t have impacted Farook as he wasn’t even on the no-fly list when he flew to Saudi Arabia to pick up his new wife.
Farook flew under the radar for the five years while working for the health department, leaving no clues of his murderous intentions. Said Griselda Reisinger, who worked with Farook, “He never struck me as a fanatic. He never struck me as suspicious.”
Only after the fact did those intentions become obvious, concluded a former CIA operative, Robert Baer. The attack on Wednesday “has the hallmarks of what we’ve seen in the Middle East” and was conducted with “a skill you don’t see unless people have had preparation and training.” This was confirmed by San Bernardino Police Chief Jarrod Burguan: “They came prepared to do what they did, as if they were on a mission.”
Nowhere was the question asked, How could the victims have defended themselves? The couple was able to pass background checks when purchasing their weapons, so those checks were worthless.
And the rules for law-abiding citizens to obtain a concealed carry permit in San Bernardino are so onerous as to essentially make obtaining one impossible. The city has instituted a “may issue” rule for the county sheriff, rather than “shall issue,” giving him the freedom to decline issue without comment. An applicant must subject himself to a personal interview, and he or she is only allowed to list three firearms on a permit that must be renewed every two years.
The fees are stout: $254 for fingerprinting, administrative work, and a background check, plus another $100 for the mandatory firearms training course before the permit can be issued. The fees are more than the cost of an inexpensive handgun.
So, thanks to local politicians, innocents who otherwise might have been able to defend themselves died needlessly in the attack.
In an astonishing admission that the “gun-free” mindset that so enamors liberal politicians might be wrong after all,USAToday allowed a most reasonable letter from the publisher of The Truth About Guns blog to be printed. Wrote Robert Farago:
What would [more gun control laws] have done to prevent the slaughter? What would any gun control law do to prevent people from enacting their homicidal plans?... As the French terrorist attacks proved, gun control doesn’t work. Worse, civilian disarmament leaves innocent people defenseless against killers. Gun control enables — rather than prevents — homicide.
Politicians who have decreed that the couple’s victims would be defenseless are at least partly responsible for Wednesday’s grisly results. 
______________________________________________________________

MUSLIM TERROR HAS ARRIVED (AGAIN): 

San Bernardino was Muslim terror attack 

(in a gun-free zone)

SEE: http://www.gunssavelife.com/?p=19236republished below 
in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

Terrorists, criminal and nut jobs love those “Gun-Free Zones”.  Those dangerous signs are like a dinner bell to bad guys, making them salivate like Pavlov’s dogs.
Syed Farook, his wonderful bride Tashfeen Malik, and probably a third suspect used GoPro cameras to record their jihad attack against Americans yesterday in San Bernardino, California, no doubt hoping to send the video to their friends for recruiting and terror promotion purposes.
At least one person saw suspicious activity at the scumbag terrorist’s house, but decided not to notify authorities because he didn’t want to “racially profile” the multiple Arabic men coming and going.  Ah, political correctness costs lives.  A small price to pay for being politically correct, right?  (That’s sarcasm.)
We adore the Detroit police chief’s thoughts on why terrorists have (thus far) passed over his city:
DETROIT (CBS Detroit – caution video autoplays) More guns, fewer problems. That, at least, is Detroit Police Chief’s James Craig’s view of Detroit and fears about a possible terrorist attack.
While cities around the world are on heightened alert following a devastating ISIS attack in Paris, Detroit’s police chief says he believes the fear that armed citizens would return fire serves as a deterrent for a potential terrorist attack in the rust belt city.
Of course, B. Hussein Obama prefers to attribute the attack to “workplace violence”.   That way he and Hillary can call for more gun control to stop “workplace violence”.
Remember, Obama said the Fort Hood attack by a “vetted” Muslim Major was “workplace violence” as well.  Obama paid the jihadist major over $300,000 after the major committed his attack.  Only in Obama’s America, folks.
Don’t be afraid of goat-humping Muslim terrorists.  Be prepared and be ready.  Make sure your loved ones are prepared and ready as well.
_______________________________________________________________

Live video inside San Bernardino shooting
Published on Dec 2, 2015
28-year-old Syed Rizwan Farook and 27-year-old Tashfeen Malik, a married couple, were the assailants who killed 14 people and wounded 17 more at a San Bernardino, Calif. county office building. Investigators add they are "pretty comfortable" Farook and Malik were the only two involved in the attack, and say that they have not ruled out terrorism as a possible motive.
San Bernardino shooting suspect traveled to Saudi Arabia, was married, appeared to be living 'American Dream,' co-workers say.
the holiday gathering got underway Wednesday morning, Syed Farook joined dozens of his colleagues from San Bernardino County’s Public Health Department. Farook seemed quiet during the early hours of the event, then vanished just as a group photo was about to be taken.

Shorty afterward, gunfire erupted at the Inland Regional Center where the employees filled a conference room. Within hours, law enforcement sources identified a man named Syed Farook as a suspect in the massacre and said he was shot to death in a gun battle with officers.

Police officials released little information about the suspects, including where they worked. And the sources, who spoke on condition of anonymity because the case was ongoing, did not provide any details about the suspect other than his name.

Co-workers told The Times that they were shocked to hear Farook’s name linked to the shooting. Two health department employees who were in the bathroom when the bullets began to fly said Farook was quiet and polite, with no obvious grudges.

They said Farook had traveled to Saudi Arabia and returned with a new wife he met online. The couple had a baby and appeared to be “living the American dream,” said Patrick Baccari, a food inspector who shared a cubicle with Farook.

Records show Sayed Raheel Farook bought a two bedroom Corona home in
March 2014. Farook’s social media profile shows he is married and has at
least one young child. His wife did not return messages left on
Wednesday.
The Daily Beast knocked on the Corona, CA home's door and was met by a
man who said, “My name is Farook.” When asked if he knew Sayed, the man
said, “Of course I know him but I have nothing to say.” When asked
about Syed being named as a suspect, he said, “I have nothing to say.”
Behind Farook, was a brightly lit home with low-slung sectional
couches and boxes for appliances. The smell of basmati rice cooking came
wafting through the door. A set of womens sandals sat outside of the
security door.
Five minutes after he answered the door, Farook got into a white car
and drove away, answering questions again with, “I have nothing to
say.”
The Daily Beast contacted Syed Raheel Farook's sister, Saira Khan, by
phone on Wednesday shortly after the shooting. She said the media was
jumping to conclusions on identifying the suspect and said that her
brother was at work. Khan said she would try to get in touch with her
brother and pass along his contact information.
In the neighborhood in Redlands neighborhood where the Farook family
kept its home—and where police executed their search—it’s trash day.
Typically that’s not a big deal, but on this day all of those green,
black, and blue barrels look suspicious—the perfect place to hide an
explosive device.Thank You!

You are now subscribed to the Cheat Sheet. We will not share your email with anyone for any reason

You are now subscribed to the Daily Digest. We will not share your email with anyone for any reason

You are now subscribed to the Daily Digest and Cheat Sheet. We will not share your email with anyone for any reason


There’s good reason to be on edge. In front of the condo complex
where the Farook family lived is a SWAT vehicle and though it’s hard to
see anything in the darkness, apparently a bomb-diffusing robot has been
going between the vehicle and the condo unit.
At almost exactly 6:30 pm, there was what distinctly sounded like a
shotgun blast that came from the condo complex. It shook up the gaggle
of local news people who were setting up their stand-ups. At that point,
a huge contingent of press and neighborhood looky-loos were gathered
behind a police cordon a little less than a football field away from the
complex.
About 20 minutes after the blast, police pushed the press line back
two blocks to the north so we were about a half a mile away and unable
to see anything. The officer said that there was a threat and needed to
move us back for safety reasons.
A Daily Beast reporter slipped through the cordon and down a side
street and was able to get a direct view of the condo where there were
orange flashing lights that looked like they were on top of a pole that
was coming out of a truck. The homes, some of which have been decorated
in Christmas lights, seems largely abandoned besides the SWAT officers
and press, the neighborhood was entirely silent.


WHO WERE THEY AND WHY?


The facts shoot holes in Obama’s claim that US is only host to mass killings

SEE: http://the-trumpet-online.com/the-facts-shoot-holes-in-obamas-claim-that-us-is-only-host-to-mass-killings/republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

By John R. Lott
On Tuesday, President Obama stunned Americans and French alike with his false claims about gun violence in America. “I say this every time we’ve got one of these mass shootings. This just doesn’t happen in other countries,” claimed Obama. It is a claim that he has continually repeated over the years.
Talk about being self-absorbed.
The French have witnessed three mass public shootings this year. January saw two attacks, one on the Charlie Hebdo magazine and another on a Paris supermarket.
In the November attacks, 129 people were killed and 352 were injured. In just 2015, France suffered more casualties – killings and injuries – from mass public shootings than the U.S. has suffered during Obama’s entire presidency (508 to 424). This number includes the San Bernandino massacre on Wednesday.
Obama also overlooks Norway, where Anders Behring Breivik used a gun to kill 67 people and wound 110 others. Still others were killed by bombs that Breivik detonated.  Of the four worst K-12 school shootings, three have occurred in Europe. Germany had two of these — one in 2002 at Erfut and another in 2009 at Winnenden, with a total death toll of 34.
Obama isn’t correct even if he meant the frequency of fatalities or attacks. Many European countries actually have higher rates of death from public shootings that resulted in four or more murders. It’s simply a matter of adjusting for America’s much larger population.
Let’s look at mass public shootings from 2009 to the middle of June this year. To compare fairly with American shootings, I excluded attacks that might be better classified as struggles over sovereignty. For instance, I did not count the 22 people killed in the Macedonian town of Kumanovo last month.
Norway had the highest annual death rate, with 2 mass public shooting fatalities per million people. Macedonia had a rate of 0.38, Serbia 0.28, Slovakia 0.20, Finland 0.14, Belgium 0.14, and the Czech Republic 0.13.  The US comes in No. 8 with 0.095 mass public shooting fatalities per million people. Austria and Switzerland are close behind.
In terms of the frequency of attacks, the United States ranks ninth, with 0.09 attacks per million people.  Macedonia, Serbia, Switzerland, Norway, Slovakia, Finland, Belgium, and the Czech Republic all had higher rates.
There are two other studies on these questions that have gotten a fair amount of attention.
One, by State University of New York-Oswego public justice professor Jaclyn Schildkraut and Texas State University researcher H. Jaymi Elsass, who look at shootings across countries, has left out a large number of shootings in other countries.
Yet, despite the extensive news coverage their study has received, they miss a lot of cases.  For example, in France, they miss three mass public shootings:
— Tours, France, October 29, 2001: four people were killed and 10 wounded when a French railway worker started killing people at a busy intersection in the city.
— Nanterre, France, March 27, 2002: a man kills eight city councilors after a city council meeting.
— Toulouse, France, March 19, 2012, Mohammed Merah killed four people (the killer also killed people in Montauban, France).
Other cases are missed in such countries as Austria, Belgium, Finland, Netherlands, Italy, Macedonia, Spain, Switzerland and Slovakia.
It takes a lot of time and effort to find all the cases, but if you get all the attacks in the U.S. and miss those in other countries, it makes the U.S. look a lot worse.
Another by Lankford reportedly goes back to 1966, but while he shares his study with reporters, he requires that they don’t share it with researchers in the area and, despite the wide publicity given his findings, he has repeatedly turned down requests by myself to see his research.
The president’s statement was also limited in another sense.  He was referring only to shootings in his statement, but bombs are frequently used elsewhere in the world.
The Boston Marathon bombing was a rare exception these days in the United States. But countries such as Russia have frequently suffered bombings. Indeed, since 2009, the nation has seen 1.31 deaths per million from bombings that caused four or more fatalities.
Between 2007 and 2011, there was an average of 6,282 terrorist attacks per year outside of Iraq, Afghanistan and the U.S. On average, more than 27,000 people were killed, injured or kidnapped each year.
Obama keeps using these attacks to advocate requiring background checks on private transfers of guns. Such a requirement, however, already exists in France and almost all of Europe.
The background checks failed. So, too, did France and Belgium’s complete bans on the weapons used in those attacks. The terrorists who attacked those countries still got the weapons that they wanted.
Of the people stopped by background checks, nearly all are people who should have been allowed to buy guns. These delays may be mere inconveniences for most people, but they can endanger the lives of people who are being stalked and need immediate protection.
There is another common factor between mass public shootings.  Virtually all of the attacks in America and Europe are taking place where general citizens can’t carry guns for protection. At some point, it has to become apparent to gun control advocates that gun-free zones only protect the killers.
Can Obama actually believe his claim that these attacks “just doesn’t happen in other countries”?  More likely, Obama is willing to go to any extreme as he pushes for European-type gun control.  The last thing he wants to admit is that countries with such strict gun-control laws can have so many deadly attacks.
______________________________________________________________
CALIFORNIA JIHAD FACED NO OPPOSITION 
DUE TO STATE ANTI-GUN LAWS
FEDS FIND 15 PIPE BOMBS

WHAT THEY'RE NOT TELLING YOU
BY PAUL JOSEPH WATSON


SEE ALSO: http://christiannews.net/2015/12/03/muslim-man-wife-identified-as-assailants-in-murder-of-14-at-california-social-services-center/;
EXCERPTS: 
Syed Farook, 28, and Tashfeen Malik, 28, were killed during a shootout with police mid-afternoon local time. The two had been dressed in body armor and tactical gear, and donned GoPro cameras to record the bloodbath that they unleashed on the Inland Regional Center, a facility for developmental disabled persons.
Farook and Malik led police on a chase, which concluded four hours later as Malik drove the vehicle while Farook fired at the 21 officers that has surrounded the couple. The two died after being gunned down by police.
Officials searched the couple’s vehicle after the shooting and found a remote control toy car, which had reportedly been rigged to set off three explosives at Farook and Malik’s residence. Police sent a robot to the couple’s home in Redlands, California, where they detonated the explosives inside. The apartment has been described as an “IED facility.”