Translate

Friday, July 31, 2015

NEW HAMPSHIRE NOT THE FREE STATE IT PURPORTS TO BE~GAY MARRIAGE, ABORTION, CENSORING OF SPEECH ARE ROADBLOCKS TO CHRISTIANS, CONSERVATIVES & PATRIOTS

"RACIST MICRO-AGGRESSIONS" 
YOU MUST AVOID
NEW HAMPSHIRE NOT THE FREE STATE 
IT PURPORTS TO BE
SEE & DISREGARD:

"101 Reasons to Move to New Hampshire"


SEE THIS YOUTUBE CHANNEL INSTEAD:

FREE ECONOMY WITHOUT FREE SPEECH?
BIBLE BELIEVING CHRISTIANS NOT WELCOME IN N.H.
"FREEDOM WITHOUT MORALITY IS NOT LIBERTY"
PAYING WITH GOLD & SILVER COINS OR BITCOINS?
NO SALES TAX, BUT OTHER TAXES TO MAKE UP THE DIFFERENCE
WHY YOU SHOULD MOVE TO N.H.-THINK AGAIN


UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE: 

USING THE WORD “AMERICAN” IS OFFENSIVE

'Obese', 'normal', 'mothering', 'fathering', 'senior citizens', 'homosexual', 'illegal alien' also discouraged
BY PAUL JOSEPH WATSON
SEE: http://www.infowars.com/university-of-new-hampshire-using-the-word-american-is-offensive/republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

Using the words “American,” “obese,” “normal,” “mothering,” “fathering,” “homosexual,” “illegal alien,” and “senior citizens,” is offensive and should be discouraged, according to a “Bias-Free Language Guide” posted on the University of New Hampshire website.
The guide, first uncovered by Campus Reform, “is meant to invite inclusive excellence in [the] campus community.”
The word “American” is “problematic” according to the guide because it “assumes the U.S. is the only country inside [the continents of North and South America].”
Calling people “illegal aliens” is also politically incorrect, with the preferred term for undocumented immigrants being “person seeking asylum,” or “refugee,” while the word “foreigner” is discouraged and replaced with “international people.”
More banned words and phrases include;
– “Caucasian (replaced with “European-American individuals”);
– “Mothering” and “fathering” (replaced with “parenting” and “nurturing” so as to “avoid gendering a non-gendered activity”);
– “Homosexual” (replaced with “gay,” “lesbian,” “same gender loving”);
– “Obese” or “overweight” (replaced with “people of size”);
– Saying a person is “poor” (replaced with “person who lacks advantages that others have”);
– Saying the word “healthy” because it’s offensive to disabled people, who can’t be called disabled, they must be called a “person who is wheelchair mobile”).
“Terms also considered problematic include: “elders,” “senior citizen,” “overweight” (which the guide says is “arbitrary”), “speech impediment,” “dumb,” “sexual preference,” “manpower,” “freshmen,” “mailman,” and “chairman,” in addition to many others,” writes Peter Hasson.
The guide also rails against “ciscentrism,” which “includes the lack of gender-neutral restrooms, locker rooms, and residences” at the university.
To his credit, the president of the University of New Hampshire Mark Huddleston responded to the story by asserting that the guide was not official campus policy.
“I am troubled by many things in the language guide, especially the suggestion that the use of the term ‘American’ is misplaced or offensive,” he said. “The only UNH policy on speech is that it is free and unfettered on our campuses. It is ironic that what was probably a well-meaning effort to be ‘sensitive’ proves offensive to many people, myself included.”
Meanwhile, Republican State Senator Jeb Bradley has vowed to take the guide into consideration next time lawmakers decide how much money to give to the university.
“Implying the word ‘American’ is not appropriate to use on campus is un-American to say the least,” he said. “Will UNH next propose to change our Live Free or Die motto to Live Free but Upset No-One?”
The University of New Hampshire is by no means the only educational institution that is attempting to encourage censorious codes of political correctness on campus that completely contradict the notion of universities being bastions of free speech.
Earlier this month we reported on how the University of Wisconsin (Stevens Point) was teaching faculty members that all manner of harmless behaviors and phrases were examples of “racial microaggressions.”
The examples included; Asking someone where they are from or where they were born, telling someone they speak good English, telling someone that you have several black friends, saying that you’re not a racist, and complimenting an Asian person by telling them they are very articulate.
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN TOO!
MICRO AGGRESSIONS ARE RACIST?
HERE'S THE LIST OF NO-NOs 
THAT ARE NOT COVERED BY THE FIRST AMENDMENT:
Published on Jul 2, 2015
Do you have several black friends, compliment people of color, and think that America is a melting pot?.....You're a racist, according to the University of Wisconsin - Stevens Point.

Here's an actual list of things that according to the University of Wisconsin - Stevens Point are racist;

- Asking someone where they are from or where they were born.

- Telling someone they speak good English.

- Telling someone that you have several black friends.

- Saying that you're not a racist.

- Complimenting an Asian person by telling them they are very articulate.

- Asking an Asian person for help with science or math.

- Uttering the phrase "There is only one race, the human race."

- Saying that you think America is a melting pot and that when you look at someone you don't see race.

- Believing that the most qualified person, regardless of race, should get the job.

- Thinking that every person, regardless of race, can succeed in society if they work hard enough.

- Telling a black person who is being too loud to be quiet.

- Telling an Asian or Latino person who is too quiet to speak up.

- Mistaking a person of color for a staff member when you're in a store.

- Calling something "gay".

- Doing an impression of someone's dialect or accent.

University of Wisconsin - 'Examples of Racial Microaggressions' - http://www.uwsp.edu/acadaff/NewFacult...

_____________________________________________________

Sex Workers' Rights at University of New Hampshire


Saying American Is The New N Word


New Hampshire Defunds Planned Parenthood Despite Governor's Objection:

BY HEATHER CLARK
SEE: http://christiannews.net/2015/08/06/new-hampshire-defunds-planned-parenthood/republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

CONCORD, N.H. — Officials in the state of New Hampshire have voted to defund the abortion giant Planned Parenthood on Wednesday, canceling its $650,000 contract.
The 3-2 party line vote by the State Executive Council comes as a result of a series of videos released by the Center for Medical Progress, showing that the organization harvests the organs of aborted babies donated by their mothers, and sells them to scientific companies who pay the organization the body parts.
The majority vote comes despite objections from Gov. Mary Hassan, who also released a statement decrying the decision.
“The council’s vote to defund Planned Parenthood will hurt the health and economic well-being of thousands of Granite Staters,” she said. “Moving forward, I will continue to fight to ensure that women and families have access to the important health services that are essential to the economic security and vitality of our families.”
But the the State Executive Council is calling for an investigation into Planned Parenthood, and the Republican State Committee is backing the proposition. The Committee is also requesting that funding be reallocated to other women’s health organizations.
“The appalling videos showing Planned Parenthood executives discussing the sale of human body parts have raised serious and legitimate concerns,” said Chair Jennifer Horn in a statement. “Instead of calling for an investigation of Planned Parenthood’s potentially criminal activity, Governor Hassan has turned a blind eye to this controversy and tried to give more taxpayer dollars to this scandal-plagued organization.”
“It’s time for Governor Hassan to put politics aside and work with the Commissioner of Health and Human Services and the Executive Council to identify alternative health care providers to cover the services that were included in this contract,” she stated.
The legal organization Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF) also applauded the council for its move.
“The people of New Hampshire should not be forced to fund a billion-dollar corporation that was caught on camera negotiating the sale of baby body parts,” said ADF Senior Counsel Casey Mattox. “The New Hampshire Executive Council should therefore be commended for ending the use of state taxpayer dollars for such barbarism.”
“No one should miss the horrific reality of what Planned Parenthood does behind closed doors, as revealed in the recently released undercover videos,” he continued. “Our tax dollars should fund local public health clinics, not corporate welfare for Planned Parenthood. We join the call … for New Hampshire’s attorney general to thoroughly investigate Planned Parenthood.”
The state of New Hampshire has contracts with Planned Parenthood of Northern New England in the amount of $385,000; Planned Parenthood NNE-Claremont in the amount of $253,900; Weeks Medical Center in the amount of $117,100; Joan Lovering Health Center in the amount of $134,200; and Concord Feminist Health Center in the amount of $179,800.